<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Mildly Pleased</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mildlypleased.com</link>
	<description>Lower your expectations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 16:29:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<!-- podcast_generator="Blubrry PowerPress/4.0" -->
	<itunes:summary>Lower your expectations</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:author>Mildly Pleased</itunes:author>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/plugins/powerpress/itunes_default.jpg" />
	<itunes:subtitle>Lower your expectations</itunes:subtitle>
	
		<item>
		<title>T3 18: Top 10 Children&#8217;s Playthings That Should Never Be Movies</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5984</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5984#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 07:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, Battleship. Who knew that for all these years what we were actually play was a Michael Bay-esque battle for the planet between brave sailors and devious robot aliens? Nobody, because that&#8217;s not how the game works. And yet, here we are. This week, we tackle the issue of dumb adaptations with a bunch of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/t31.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><p>So, <em>Battleship</em>. Who knew that for all these years what we were actually play was a Michael Bay-esque battle for the planet between brave sailors and devious robot aliens? Nobody, because that&#8217;s not how the game works. And yet, here we are. This week, we tackle the issue of dumb adaptations with a bunch of projects that are theoretically in the pipeline, but really, never should be made.</p>
<p>You can turn the card over and look at the answers after the break.</p>
<p><strong>Top Ways to Listen:</strong><br />
[<a href="http://www.itunes.com/podcast?id=501634977">iTunes</a>] Subscribe to T3 on iTunes<br />
[<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/toptenthursdays">RSS</a>] Subscribe to the T3 RSS feed<br />
[<a href="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Podcast_5-17-12.mp3">MP3</a>] Download the MP3</p>

<p><span id="more-5984"></span></p>
<p>10. Monopoly<br />
9. <em>Asteroids</em><br />
8. Hot Wheels<br />
7. <em>Missile Command</em><br />
6. Ouija<br />
5. Candyland<br />
4. The Magic Kingdom<br />
3. Rubik&#8217;s Cube<br />
2. Viewmaster<br />
1. Stretch Armstrong</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=5984</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Podcast_5-17-12.mp3" length="40397252" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>t3</itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:subtitle>So, Battleship. Who knew that for all these years what we were actually play was a Michael Bay-esque battle for the planet between brave sailors and devious robot aliens? Nobody, because that&#039;s not how the game works. And yet, here we are. This week,</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>So, Battleship. Who knew that for all these years what we were actually play was a Michael Bay-esque battle for the planet between brave sailors and devious robot aliens? Nobody, because that&#039;s not how the game works. And yet, here we are. This week, we tackle the issue of dumb adaptations with a bunch of projects that are theoretically in the pipeline, but really, never should be made.

You can turn the card over and look at the answers after the break.

Top Ways to Listen:
[iTunes] Subscribe to T3 on iTunes
[RSS] Subscribe to the T3 RSS feed
[MP3] Download the MP3





10. Monopoly
9. Asteroids
8. Hot Wheels
7. Missile Command
6. Ouija
5. Candyland
4. The Magic Kingdom
3. Rubik&#039;s Cube
2. Viewmaster
1. Stretch Armstrong</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Mildly Pleased</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>1:36:11</itunes:duration>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>To Legit to Syndiquit</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5980</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5980#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 08:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Syndicate Syndicate is the latest in a long line of quality first person shooters that will be forgotten for not being a big enough deal like Rage and Bulletstorm before. Which is a shame, because Syndicate has quit the pedigree: it is both the revival of a classic, somewhat forgotten franchise and one of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/syndicate-pc-boxart-e1337155139941.jpeg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><em>Syndicate</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><em>Syndicate</em> is the latest in a long line of quality first person shooters that will be forgotten for not being a big enough deal like <em>Rage</em> and <em>Bulletstorm</em> before. Which is a shame, because Syndicate has quit the pedigree: it is both the revival of a classic, somewhat forgotten franchise and one of the best coop FPS games in a while.</p>
<p>If you haven&#8217;t been keeping score, the first <em>Syndicate</em> was an isometric RTS that came out for the PC in 1993. So the leap to this new game is a big one. What remains of the original series is its setting: a gritty cyberpunk future where the world is run by corporations. Miles Kilo is an agent of Eurocorp who has been given the company&#8217;s sweetest new digital implants, designed by scientist Lily Drawl (Rosario Dawson). Eurocorp&#8217;s CEO, played by Brian Cox, sends Kilo on some corporate espionage missions, which all quickly turn into bloodbaths.</p>
<p>The cinematics in <em>Syndicate</em> are generally pretty cool, the game does a great job of making Rosario Dawson and Brian Cox look like they do in real life, which is surprisingly uncommon in games. But the game basically comes down to heavily scripted corridor shooting, something that has to be done absolutely amazingly to be exciting in this day and age. This game doesn&#8217;t get there, and the campaign isn&#8217;t particularly long either. To borrow the title of this blog, it was mildly pleasing.</p>
<p>What did seem great was the online multiplayer. You get to level up, choose gear, upgrade things and all the other stuff that seems necessary to the online shooting experience nowadays. Players can even start their own corporations and hire people, a neat way to bring clans into the game. It all boils down to objective-based cooperative missions, which deliver on the promise of games like <em>Resistance 2</em> and <em>Brink</em>. Teamwork is paramount, as players can follow the roles typically associated with MMOs in combat. I was all about healing and hacking my team, it helped me get into it faster than many multiplayer FPS games.</p>
<p>Oh yeah, hacking. So implants aren&#8217;t just glorified Google Goggles, providing a neat HUD. They actually let you hack into computers in the environment, and even in other people&#8217;s brains. So you can, for example, reprogram somebody to make him turn on his allies, then commit suicide when they&#8217;re all dead. It&#8217;s pretty brutal. Perhaps what&#8217;s most brutal is when Kilo finds someone with a useful chip in their brain, when he will proceed to use a special tool to yank it out of their head. Indeed, this game earns its M rating.</p>
<p>So I had a good time with <em>Syndicate</em>. The singleplayer wasn&#8217;t much, but it certainly wasn&#8217;t bad. The multiplayer is real cool, I wish more people were into it. It&#8217;s so integral to the experience, EA doesn&#8217;t even require an online pass to play. But Syndicate&#8217;s already been out for a few months and it seems that everyone has already forgotten about it. I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if in a few more months, the servers are quiet. Such a shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=5980</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shadow Man</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5965</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5965#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 23:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dark Shadows At this point I&#8217;ve seen every Tim Burton movie. Since Mar&#8217;s Attacks in 1996 I&#8217;ve also seen them all in theaters. So more than anything I went to Dark Shadows to keep the streak alive. I enjoyed Burton&#8217;s gothic, fairy tale-like, movie for many years, but I&#8217;ll admit he&#8217;s not as cutting edge [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/dark-shadows-poster-e1337038017982.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><em>Dark Shadows</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/2.5.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>At this point I&#8217;ve seen every Tim Burton movie. Since <em>Mar&#8217;s Attacks</em> in 1996 I&#8217;ve also seen them all in theaters. So more than anything I went to <em>Dark Shadows</em> to keep the streak alive. I enjoyed Burton&#8217;s gothic, fairy tale-like, movie for many years, but I&#8217;ll admit he&#8217;s not as cutting edge as he once was. I&#8217;m disappointed that Burton&#8217;s latest film is yet another adaptation. I&#8217;ve also never had any interest in the <em>Dark Shadows</em> Soap opera series. Still, as a guy who loves monsters and the macabre I was somewhat curious. So what I got was an occasionally entertaining if not messy monster mash of vampire jokes, pokes at 70s culture, and muddled direction.</p>
<p><em>Dark Shadows</em> begins with the story of Barnabas Collins (Johnny Depp) in the 1760s. Moving from Liverpool to a Maine fishing port as a boy, we learn about the Collins families rise to power, but more importantly their demise. As a popular young bachelor, Barnabas breaks the heart of a witch named Angelique (Eva Green) who in turn kills his parents and turns Barnabas into a vampire. Additionally, she puts a curse on Barnabas&#8217; true love Josette (Bella Heathcote) leading her to commit suicide. Flash forward to 1972 and we are introduced the modern Collins family. Once a respected family with a successful fishing business, the Collins family is now but a mere shadow of it&#8217;s former self. So a young woman calling herself Victoria Winters (also Bella Heathcote) is hired by the family to teach the spooky, 10-year old Collin&#8217;s boy David, blah, blah, blah, Barnabas is conveniently unearthed from his coffin by construction workers, yadda, yadda, the evil witch is still around and still mad at the Collins family. Oh my god, so much boring plot! That&#8217;s the problem when you try to cram a whole TV show into one movie .</p>
<p><em>Dark Shadows</em> has interesting characters, even some good good jokes, but it doesn&#8217;t know where to go from there. The Fact that we are first introduced to Barnabas as the protagonist, then Victoria as the protagonist, and then back to Barnabas shows that they really didn&#8217;t know where the heart of the story was. There are so many different plots and subplots to focus on; Barnabas&#8217; love affairs between Angelique and Victoria, the attempt to revive the family business, the personal woes of each member of the Collins family, it&#8217;s a mess. Stick to one plot point and make sure it&#8217;s something that is genuinely interesting and compelling.</p>
<p>I went in hoping this would be something around the lines of Barry Sonnenfeld&#8217;s <i>Addams Family</I> movies. Say what you will, I think those movies did a fantastic job of blending the macabre with modern america. Did you know Caroline Thompson who wrote <em>The Addams Family</em> movie also wrote <em>Edward Scissorhands</em>? <em>Dark Shadows</em> has a few good gags, but the humor is more or less gone by the third act. Johnny Depp provides the most laughs in a very committed performance. I&#8217;d of much rather preferred a flat out comedy about Barnabas readjusting to modern life than whatever this is supposed to be. I liked the humor, but whenever it tried to be serious or insert action I was bored to tears.</p>
<p>Tim Burton&#8217;s always been a style over substance kind of guy, so I&#8217;m not surprised he&#8217;s been so hit or miss most of his career. I&#8217;m not even sure if Tim Burton ever knew what a good story looked like, so really it&#8217;s all just dumb luck. Burton&#8217;s next film will be a stop-motion remake of his original 1984 short film <em>Frankenweenie</em>. Hmm, possibly intriguing but definitely unnecessary. I also recall hearing that he had some interest in making a stop-motion <em>Addams Family</em> movie… Nooo! The horror! The horror!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=5965</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>T3 17: Top 10 Actors Who Should Quit</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5914</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5914#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 06:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5914</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week, we go mean. Real mean. We go right for the jugular. If you&#8217;re on this list, we&#8217;re worried about you. Real worried. We think your talent&#8217;s run out. Maybe it never existed. Maybe you just keep picking terrible projects. The point is, we think your best career move is putting an end to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/t31.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><p>This week, we go mean. Real mean. We go right for the jugular. If you&#8217;re on this list, we&#8217;re worried about you. Real worried. We think your talent&#8217;s run out. Maybe it never existed. Maybe you just keep picking terrible projects. The point is, we think your best career move is putting an end to it. I know it sounds harsh, but, hey, you&#8217;re an actor. You&#8217;re used to rejection and disappointment. And if you&#8217;re not, maybe you needed a little more in your life.</p>
<p>Check out the really mean list after the jump. And, you know, no hard feelings.</p>
<p><strong>Top Ways to Listen:</strong><br />
[<a href="http://www.itunes.com/podcast?id=501634977">iTunes</a>] Subscribe to T3 on iTunes<br />
[<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/toptenthursdays">RSS</a>] Subscribe to the T3 RSS feed<br />
[<a href="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/podcast_5-10-12.mp3">MP3</a>] Download the MP3</p>

<p><span id="more-5914"></span></p>
<p>10. Jason Statham<br />
9. John Heder<br />
8. Mel Gibson<br />
7. Kate Hudson<br />
6. Katherine Hiegl<br />
5. Ashton Kutcher<br />
4. Jennifer Aniston<br />
3. Shia LaBeouf<br />
2. Adam Sandler<br />
1. Eddie Murphy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=5914</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/podcast_5-10-12.mp3" length="42980542" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>t3</itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:subtitle>This week, we go mean. Real mean. We go right for the jugular. If you&#039;re on this list, we&#039;re worried about you. Real worried. We think your talent&#039;s run out. Maybe it never existed. Maybe you just keep picking terrible projects. The point is,</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>This week, we go mean. Real mean. We go right for the jugular. If you&#039;re on this list, we&#039;re worried about you. Real worried. We think your talent&#039;s run out. Maybe it never existed. Maybe you just keep picking terrible projects. The point is, we think your best career move is putting an end to it. I know it sounds harsh, but, hey, you&#039;re an actor. You&#039;re used to rejection and disappointment. And if you&#039;re not, maybe you needed a little more in your life.

Check out the really mean list after the jump. And, you know, no hard feelings.

Top Ways to Listen:
[iTunes] Subscribe to T3 on iTunes
[RSS] Subscribe to the T3 RSS feed
[MP3] Download the MP3





10. Jason Statham
9. John Heder
8. Mel Gibson
7. Kate Hudson
6. Katherine Hiegl
5. Ashton Kutcher
4. Jennifer Aniston
3. Shia LaBeouf
2. Adam Sandler
1. Eddie Murphy</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Mildly Pleased</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>1:29:32</itunes:duration>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Avengers, Assembled</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5907</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5907#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 09:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Avengers This is what we&#8217;ve all been waiting for. The bulk of super hero movies from the past four years, Iron Man, The Incredible Hulk, Iron Man 2, Thor and Captain America: The First Avenger, all lead to this. One movie, six super heroes. It&#8217;s exciting to think about, and even more exciting to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/the-avengers-poster-e1336206463683.jpeg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><em>The Avengers</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.5.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>This is what we&#8217;ve all been waiting for. The bulk of super hero movies from the past four years, <em>Iron Man</em>, <em>The Incredible Hulk</em>, <em>Iron Man 2</em>, <em>Thor</em> and <em>Captain America: The First Avenger</em>, all lead to this. One movie, six super heroes. It&#8217;s exciting to think about, and even more exciting to watch. It took a lot to get here, but <em>The Avengers</em> was certainly worth it.</p>
<p>Earth&#8217;s mightiest heroes are all where we left them; Iron Man (Robert Downey, Jr.) is living large, The Hulk (Mark Ruffalo now) on the lam, Captain America (Chris Evans) is alone in a strange new world, Hawkeye (Jeremy Renner) and Black Widow (Scarlet Johansson) are off being badass agents, Thor (Chris Hemsworth) is off in a magical kingdom. One person isn&#8217;t where we left them: Loki (Tom Hiddleston), Thor&#8217;s scheming brother who fell off the rainbow bridge in that movie. He&#8217;s not taken exile well, and he&#8217;s got an army to help him get revenge. And so a plan is set in motion to begin an interplanetary war, a plan that can be stopped by no lone super hero. Fortunately, Nick Fury (Samuel L. Jackson) has been putting a team together.</p>
<p>A lot of the credit for <em>The Avengers</em> has to go to Joss Whedon, who co-wrote and directed the film. As someone who not only loves comics, but has written his own, he is able to deftly handle these larger-than-life characters, delivering satisfying closure for all the Marvel movies leading to this one. Iron Man learns to be less selfish. Captain America finds a place for himself and becomes the leader he never quite was in his own movie. Hulk finally makes progress on controlling himself, his main concern from when he was Edward Norton. Whedon pays due diligence to all of these beloved characters, and it really pays off.</p>
<p>The ending of <em>The Avengers</em> is <em>Transformers: Dark of the Moon</em>. Straight up: a once-divided team fights a seemingly endless army of invading aliens pouring out of the sky while trying to get to the one skyscraper that isn&#8217;t being knocked down. Only, it&#8217;s a million times better because the action&#8217;s easier to follow, it&#8217;s not 400 minutes long, and I actually care about the characters. Even Black Widow, who I know basically nothing about, is fleshed out as a great character, with some of the best scenes in the whole movie.</p>
<p>Of course, this is in part due to the cast as well. I particularly want to point to Mark Ruffalo, since he&#8217;s the best Hulk yet and please Mr. Ruffalo, if they want to do another Hulk thing, you should be the one to do it. Robert Downey, Jr. continues to dominate every scene he&#8217;s in, but the rest of the cast tries their damnedest to rise to his level, and pretty much succeed. I hope Tom Hiddleston had as much fun playing Loki as he seems to be having on screen, because he made for an absolutely great villain and also I hope he&#8217;s not in another of these movies for a while. Too many super hero movie sequels have been ruined by villain repetition.</p>
<p>If you haven&#8217;t seen the movies leading to this one, if you don&#8217;t care about this stuff at least a little bit, this might not be the movie for you. I think <em>The Avengers</em> does well enough introducing each character, but it would be a whole lot of information to process very quickly just to keep up as a newcomer. And certain things just would never make sense. But for those of us that have been keeping up, in all just a huge payoff. I can think of a handful of scenes that fanboys will be chatting about with each other for years to come. It&#8217;s hard not to believe that this is the peak of super hero cinema.</p>
<p><em>The Avengers</em> is almost certainly my favorite of the Marvel super hero movies. I&#8217;d like to say it&#8217;s my favorite super hero movie full stop, but Chris Nolan&#8217;s <em>Batman</em> movies exist. It&#8217;s almost not fair that the last trailer they showed before <em>The Avengers</em> was for <em>The Dark Knight Rises</em>, as if to remind me that super hero movies can achieve a level of greatness beyond a gigantic nerdgasm. <em>The Avengers</em> exists in a different world from Nolan&#8217;s series, a much, much more fun world, where there&#8217;s snappy jokes and the thing closest to a theme is ass-kicking. I like being in this world almost as much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=5907</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>T3 16: Top 10 Super Heroes</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5876</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5876#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 07:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hark! Up in the sky, it&#8217;s a bird! It&#8217;s a plane! It&#8217;s Top Ten Thursdays! In honor of the imminent release of The Avengers, we narrowed down our favorite super heroes for your enjoyment. It&#8217;s pretty selfless, kind of like Superman. It&#8217;s kind of crazy, kind of like Batman. It&#8217;s a great responsibility, like Spider-Man. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/t31.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><p>Hark! Up in the sky, it&#8217;s a bird! It&#8217;s a plane! It&#8217;s Top Ten Thursdays! In honor of the imminent release of <em>The Avengers</em>, we narrowed down our favorite super heroes for your enjoyment. It&#8217;s pretty selfless, kind of like Superman. It&#8217;s kind of crazy, kind of like Batman. It&#8217;s a great responsibility, like Spider-Man. Up, up and away!</p>
<p>Check out our rogues gallery after the jump.</p>
<p><strong>Top Ways to Listen:</strong><br />
[<a href="http://www.itunes.com/podcast?id=501634977">iTunes</a>] Subscribe to T3 on iTunes<br />
[<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/toptenthursdays">RSS</a>] Subscribe to the T3 RSS feed<br />
[<a href="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/podcast_5-3-12.mp3">MP3</a>] Download the MP3</p>

<p><span id="more-5876"></span></p>
<p>10. Captain America<br />
9. Daredevil<br />
8. Iron Man<br />
7. Rorschach<br />
6. Hulk<br />
5. Green Lantern<br />
4. Wolverine<br />
3. Superman<br />
2. Spider-Man<br />
1. Batman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=5876</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Podcast_5-3-12.mp3" length="25183316" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>t3</itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:subtitle>Hark! Up in the sky, it&#039;s a bird! It&#039;s a plane! It&#039;s Top Ten Thursdays! In honor of the imminent release of The Avengers, we narrowed down our favorite super heroes for your enjoyment. It&#039;s pretty selfless, kind of like Superman. It&#039;s kind of crazy,</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Hark! Up in the sky, it&#039;s a bird! It&#039;s a plane! It&#039;s Top Ten Thursdays! In honor of the imminent release of The Avengers, we narrowed down our favorite super heroes for your enjoyment. It&#039;s pretty selfless, kind of like Superman. It&#039;s kind of crazy, kind of like Batman. It&#039;s a great responsibility, like Spider-Man. Up, up and away!

Check out our rogues gallery after the jump.

Top Ways to Listen:
[iTunes] Subscribe to T3 on iTunes
[RSS] Subscribe to the T3 RSS feed
[MP3] Download the MP3





10. Captain America
9. Daredevil
8. Iron Man
7. Rorschach
6. Hulk
5. Green Lantern
4. Wolverine
3. Superman
2. Spider-Man
1. Batman</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Mildly Pleased</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>1:44:55</itunes:duration>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>R.I.P. Adam &#8220;MCA&#8221; Yauch</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5890</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5890#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 18:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know we don&#8217;t do RIP&#8217;s as frequently as we used to, just because well, a lot of celebrities die all the time.  But I figure it&#8217;d be a shame for me to not at least pay some kind of tribute to a guy who was at the heart of a band that I like [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/header_98695.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><p>I know we don&#8217;t do RIP&#8217;s as frequently as we used to, just because well, a lot of celebrities die all the time.  But I figure it&#8217;d be a shame for me to not at least pay some kind of tribute to a guy who was at the heart of a band that I like so much that I&#8217;ve listened to <a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?p=894">all their albums</a>.  Adam Yauch, or better known as MCA, died earlier today at the age of 47 as the result of a long battle with cancer that started back in 2009.  I had been aware that this was something he&#8217;d been dealing with, but it&#8217;s still a surprise when anyone so young and full of tenacity succumbs to such a thing.</p>
<p>Yauch started the Beastie Boys in 1979 with Michael &#8220;Mike D&#8221; Diamond and Adam &#8220;Ad-Rock Horowitz as part of New York&#8217;s underground punk scene.  They eventually made the leap to another then-burgeoning form of underground music, hip-hop, and the rest as they say is history.  The Beasties burst on to the scene with the multi-platinum <em>License To Ill </em>in 1986, and never missed a beat from there.  Each album was a new adventure into some new sound, as these guys always seemed primed to re-invent themselves.  And that&#8217;s basically why these guys always have been, and probably always will be my favorite hip-hop artists of all time, because they never confined themselves to the passing trends of a genre that sees so few artist that last 5 years, let alone 25 years.  MCA always struck me as the wise elder statesman of the Beastie Boys, and I can&#8217;t imagine Mike D and Ad-Rock carrying on with the Beasties name with out him, so I really have no idea what&#8217;ll happen with them.  What I do know is I&#8217;ll probably be listening to <em>Paul&#8217;s Boutique</em> more than a few times over the next day or so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=5890</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Home is Where You Make It</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5871</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5871#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 21:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael Kiwanuka &#8211; Home Again I&#8217;ve noticed a handful of artists these days brandishing some very nostalgic R&#038;B sounds. Raphael Saadiq and Fitz and the Tantrums come to mind as two acts that not not only play old school soul, but sound like old school soul. British singer-songwriter Michael Kiwanuka is the latest artist to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/michael-kiwanuka-albumcover-home-again1.jpeg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Michael Kiwanuka &#8211; <em>Home Again</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>I&#8217;ve noticed a handful of artists these days brandishing some very nostalgic R&#038;B sounds. Raphael Saadiq and <em>Fitz and the Tantrums</em> come to mind as two acts that not not only play old school soul, but sound like old school soul. British singer-songwriter Michael Kiwanuka is the latest artist to go for that nostalgic feel, and listening to his debut album <em>Home Again</em> was just like listening to oldies radio.</p>
<p>First off, Kiwanuka has a great voice. You shouldn&#8217;t mess with soul if you don&#8217;t have the vocal chops, but chops Kiwanuka has. On <em>Home Again</em> Kwanuka already sounds like a matured artist, which is amazing considering he&#8217;s twenty-four years old. Often equipped with an acoustic guitar, Kiwanuka&#8217;s fusion of heartfelt soul and acoustic guitar has drawn comparisons to Bill Withers. The big difference being Bill Withers was an amazing songwriter and Kiwanuka is just an okay songwriter. Where Kiwanuka pens some tracks highly reminiscent of the good old days, there&#8217;s not a lot that really jumps out at you.</p>
<p>The impressive &#8220;Tell Me a Tale&#8221; leads off the album with a jazzy soul exploration (flute included). The song eventually builds to a <em>Temptations</em> like chorus that&#8217;s hard not to like. After that, my attention wanders as Kiwanuka breezes through slow acoustic numbers that never seem to go anywhere. &#8220;Bones&#8221; a possible homage to 60s doo-wop is my second favorite track on the album. If only Kiwanuka focused his energy more on the style of those two tracks I&#8217;d be sold. The acoustic stuff is nice enough, but it gets real old real quick.</p>
<p>I feel bad that wasn&#8217;t as taken with <i>Home Again</I> as I was hoping to be. I love whole retro feel of everything but it all comes down to the quality of the songs. Kiwanuka should learn to shift his focus more towards catchy R&#038;B/Pop songs as opposed to slow, bittersweet, ballads. He has a better chance of excelling as 60s-esque soulman than a brooding singer-songwriter. Either way, I look forward to where his career could possibly go down the road. </p>
<p><strong>Favorite Tracks:</strong> &#8220;Bones&#8221;, &#8220;I&#8217;ll Get Along&#8221;, &#8220;Tell Me a Tale&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=5871</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Something Ugly</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5861</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5861#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 03:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Screaming Females &#8211; Ugly With recording technology and the internet making it so easy for bands to get their music out there, it seems weird that I don&#8217;t hear about more bands refining their sound in this way before gaining more attention.  Anyways, Screaming Females have more or less been doing this for a while [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Screaming-Females-Ugly.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Screaming Females &#8211; <em>Ugly</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>With recording technology and the internet making it so easy for bands to get their music out there, it seems weird that I don&#8217;t hear about more bands refining their sound in this way before gaining more attention.  Anyways, Screaming Females have more or less been doing this for a while with a D.I.Y. aesthetic that saw them releasing their own albums independently and thriving in New Jersey&#8217;s underground scene.  Now it seems that this trio is just starting to really hit it&#8217;s stride with a growing knack for songcraft in addition to their unabashedly hard-rocking sound.</p>
<p>It seems pretty apparent that I&#8217;m always going to be drawn to that scruffy post-punk sound that continues to occasionally reverberate throughout indie rock, and that&#8217;s certainly at the backbone of Screaming Females&#8217; sound.  However, there&#8217;s also this affinity for the kind of guitar pyrotechnics that you find in the classic rock of Zeppelin or Sabbath as well.  Really, the star of the album has undeniably got to be Marissa Paternoster, who&#8217;s guitar work here establishes her as a first rate shredder of the highest order, yet there&#8217;s still an ear for melody that aptly compliments her wailing guitar solos.  And in addition to that, Paternoster&#8217;s a real howler of a vocalist, which I suppose could be a bit polarizing for some people, but I really dig the way her unhinged vocals play off of her equally unhinged guitar work.</p>
<p>The only knock I have against <em>Ugly</em> is that it&#8217;s a little on the long side at 53 minutes, considering that the band never really strays too far from it&#8217;s distinctly sludgy sound.  The one real exception to this is the album&#8217;s closing track &#8220;It&#8217;s Nice&#8221;, a more introverted acoustic number that slowly builds itself into a full-on power ballad.  The song shows that this band can do beauty just as well as abrasiveness, and thus leaves me with hope that this band could give us even greater things in the future.</p>
<p><strong>Favorite Tracks:</strong> &#8220;Rotten Apple&#8221;, &#8220;Help Me&#8221;, &#8220;It&#8217;s Nice&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=5861</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>T3 15: Top 10 Actor-Director Duos</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5841</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5841#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 08:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[History provides a deep well of leaders and followers working together, like&#8230; Caesar and Brutus. That&#8217;s true in the world of cinema as well, with great teams of actors and directors. What&#8217;s that? Filmmaking is a collaboration? Don&#8217;t tell that to John Ratzenberger, that poor guy&#8217;s been the indentured slave of Pixar for years. Let&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/t31.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><p>History provides a deep well of leaders and followers working together, like&#8230; Caesar and Brutus. That&#8217;s true in the world of cinema as well, with great teams of actors and directors. What&#8217;s that? Filmmaking is a collaboration? Don&#8217;t tell that to John Ratzenberger, that poor guy&#8217;s been the indentured slave of Pixar for years. Let&#8217;s instead focus on the actor-director teams that brought out the best in each other, whether that be true love or murderous rage.</p>
<p>Lookout below!</p>
<p><strong>Top Ways to Listen:</strong><br />
[<a href="http://www.itunes.com/podcast?id=501634977">iTunes</a>] Subscribe to T3 on iTunes<br />
[<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/toptenthursdays">RSS</a>] Subscribe to the T3 RSS feed<br />
[<a href="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/podcast_4-25-12.mp3">MP3</a>] Download the MP3</p>

<p><span id="more-5841"></span></p>
<p>10. Bill Murray / Wes Anderson<br />
9. John Goodman / The Coen Brothers<br />
8. Diane Keaton / Woody Allen<br />
7. Gene Wilder / Mel Brooks<br />
6. John Wayne / John Ford<br />
5. Humphry Bogart / John Huston<br />
4. Jack Lemmon / Billy Wilder<br />
3. Jimmy Stewart / Alfred Hitchcock<br />
2. Toshiro Mifune / Akira Kurosawa<br />
1. Robert De Niro / Martin Scorsese</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=5841</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Podcast_4-26-12.mp3" length="16532501" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>t3</itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:subtitle>History provides a deep well of leaders and followers working together, like... Caesar and Brutus. That&#039;s true in the world of cinema as well, with great teams of actors and directors. What&#039;s that? Filmmaking is a collaboration?</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>History provides a deep well of leaders and followers working together, like... Caesar and Brutus. That&#039;s true in the world of cinema as well, with great teams of actors and directors. What&#039;s that? Filmmaking is a collaboration? Don&#039;t tell that to John Ratzenberger, that poor guy&#039;s been the indentured slave of Pixar for years. Let&#039;s instead focus on the actor-director teams that brought out the best in each other, whether that be true love or murderous rage.

Lookout below!

Top Ways to Listen:
[iTunes] Subscribe to T3 on iTunes
[RSS] Subscribe to the T3 RSS feed
[MP3] Download the MP3





10. Bill Murray / Wes Anderson
9. John Goodman / The Coen Brothers
8. Diane Keaton / Woody Allen
7. Gene Wilder / Mel Brooks
6. John Wayne / John Ford
5. Humphry Bogart / John Huston
4. Jack Lemmon / Billy Wilder
3. Jimmy Stewart / Alfred Hitchcock
2. Toshiro Mifune / Akira Kurosawa
1. Robert De Niro / Martin Scorsese</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Mildly Pleased</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>1:08:52</itunes:duration>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blundercats Ho!</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5850</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5850#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 21:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jack White &#8211; Blunderbuss Being a Jack White Fan is exhausting. If he&#8217;s not recording with The Raconteurs or The Dead Weather, he&#8217;s off collaborating with artists as diverse as Danger Mouse and even The Insane Clown Posse. I&#8217;ve grown weary of following all his side projects, but this is a solo album. Blunderbuss is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/MUDD5285.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Jack White &#8211; <em>Blunderbuss</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Being a Jack White Fan is exhausting. If he&#8217;s not recording with <em>The Raconteurs</em> or <em>The Dead Weather</em>, he&#8217;s off collaborating with artists as diverse as <em>Danger Mouse</em> and even <em>The Insane Clown Posse</em>. I&#8217;ve grown weary of following all his side projects, but this is a solo album. <em>Blunderbuss</em> is pure unadulterated Jack White, but it&#8217;s nothing we haven&#8217;t already heard. Jack has shown hints of his appreciation for eclectic roots music on past albums, <em>Blunderbuss</em> just happens to be a bigger dose of that. The results are enjoyable enough, but I&#8217;m not sure I understand all the hubbub surrounding <em>Blunderbuss</em>.</p>
<p><em>Blunderbuss</em> is a little bit country, a little bit rock and roll, and a whole lot of Jack White. I&#8217;ll give it to Jack, he has quite a presence on these recordings. His howling vocal delivery is unmatched and the same could be said for his guitar work. He self produces and commands the studio like a musical Swiss Army Knife. So <em>Blunderbuss</em> maybe his best work as a producer, but certainly not as a songwriter. Strip away all the production and these songs are fairly standard and even predictable.</p>
<p>&#8220;Sixteen Saltines&#8221; is easily the best track on the album. It&#8217;s a track that calls back to both the heaviness and simplicity of <em>The White Stripes</em> and frankly, really makes me miss that band. That group built up the heaviest songs with so little, and that&#8217;s really when Jack&#8217;s at his best. It&#8217;s a shame that <em>Blunderbuss</em> doesn&#8217;t have more riff heavy hard rockers. Jack has a unique approach to country, but it&#8217;s not nearly as captivating as his approach to hard rock.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s not a whole lot that differentiates <em>Blunderbuss</em> from Jack&#8217;s work on <em>Consolers of the Lonely</em> with <em>The Raconteurs</em>. That was also a very southern-flavored rock record. So <em>Blunderbuss</em> isn&#8217;t anything considerably new. That aside, <em>Blunderbuss</em> is still enjoyable for Jack White fans. He&#8217;s clearly made an effort to make these songs as polished and complete as possible. I enjoy the feel of this album and I commend the production. All I wanted to do here was present my case as to why I feel this album isn&#8217;t the masterpiece everyone seems to be saying it is. This is a solid entry from White, but I hopes he gives me a little more time to breathe before releasing any more recordings.</p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;Freedom at 21&#8243;, &#8220;Missing Piece&#8221;, &#8220;Sixteen Saltines&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=5850</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>C.A.T: The Band</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5834</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5834#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 02:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Band &#8211; The Band (1969) I almost did this album for a Classic Album Tuesday a few weeks ago, so it was quite a shock when drummer/vocalist Levon Helm&#8217;s ailing health came up in the news not long after. Rock has lost a powerful figure with Levon&#8217;s passing, but at least I can come [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/the_band_huge.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">The Band &#8211; <em>The Band</em> (1969)</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>I almost did this album for a Classic Album Tuesday a few weeks ago, so it was quite a shock when drummer/vocalist Levon Helm&#8217;s ailing health came up in the news not long after. Rock has lost a powerful figure with Levon&#8217;s passing, but at least I can come back to this album for comfort. <em>The Band&#8217;s</em> eponymous second album has always been my favorite from the group. It&#8217;s hard to believe any band could follow up a debut like <em>Music from Big Pink</em> with an album that in many ways is just as good. For one, this album has four of my favorite <em>Band</em> songs in a row; &#8220;Rag Mama Rag&#8221;, &#8220;The Night They Drove Old Dixie Down&#8221;, &#8220;When You Awake&#8221;, and &#8220;Up On Cripple Creek&#8221;. All together it&#8217;s like a rootsy history lesson, rich with stories about the American landscape.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve always found it surprising that <em>The Band</em> (with the exception of Arkansas native Levon Helm) were from Canada. Maybe it&#8217;s because guitarist Robbie Robertson&#8217;s songs captured the beauty of American culture better than most American musicians could. &#8220;The Night They Drove Old Dixie Down&#8221; is a fine example of Robertson&#8217;s fascination with old time America. The song is such a hauntingly beautiful story of the hardships of the Civil War, and one of the most affecting songs I&#8217;ve ever heard. Of course it helps when you have an extraordinary voice like Levon Helm belting out the lyrics with such sincerity. Though you can&#8217;t overlook the other voices in <em>The Band</em>. Bassist Rick Danko and pianist Richard Manuel both brought a great deal of heart and soul into their performances.</p>
<p>The musicianship harkens back to turn of the century folk with hints of modern rock and blues. This is convincing due to the fact that every member is so versatile. Take into account a song like &#8220;Rag Mama Rag&#8221;. Here we have Robbie Robertson on guitar, Garth Hudson on piano, Richard Manuel on drums, Rick Danko on fiddle, Levon Helm on vocals/mandolin, and producer John Simon playing the bass line on sousaphone. How many bands can so seamlessly switch around the lineup and still be so cohesive? Everyone here brings so much, it&#8217;s no wonder they were known simply as &#8220;The Band.&#8221;</p>
<p>There&#8217;s so much to say about this album that I can&#8217;t even express with the words. So I&#8217;m going to take the easy way out and wrap this up. I&#8217;ll always love both <em>Band</em> albums, but this one was my introduction to the group, so it will always have a place in my heart. This album is simply one of the best of it&#8217;s era and one of my all-time favorites.</p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;The Night They Drove Old Dixie Down&#8221;, &#8220;Rag Mama Rag&#8221;, &#8220;Up on Cripple Creek&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=5834</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>To Morrow</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5255</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5255#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 01:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Shins &#8211; Port of Morrow It took listening to the a new Shins albums a few times to remind myself that I actually really like this band. I was even a fan of the Broken Bells, even though it seems most people consider that a waste of James Mercer&#8217;s time. After reading about how [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/the-shins-port-of-morrow.jpeg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">The Shins &#8211; <em>Port of Morrow</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>It took listening to the a new Shins albums a few times to remind myself that I actually really like this band. I was even a fan of the Broken Bells, even though it seems most people consider that a waste of James Mercer&#8217;s time. After reading about how Mercer fired members of the band a few times, I got it into my head that he was a big jerk. Then I finally realized it&#8217;s not really my problem how he runs his band, really all I&#8217;ve got to do is listen to the music and see if I like it. So I downloaded<em> Port of Morrow </em>and&#8230;</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s pretty good. <em>Port of Morrow</em> isn&#8217;t my favorite Shins album, the identity of which I will keep a secret, but it&#8217;s another great release from a band that has yet to disappoint. That the band here has nothing in common with the original Shins lineup save for Mercer is obvious from the very first song, &#8220;The Rifle&#8217;s Spiral,&#8221; which sounds like it could be off a new Broken Bells LP. But the very next track, &#8220;Simple Song&#8221; picks up where <em>Wincing the Night Away</em> left off, a joyous pop party.</p>
<p>The rest of the album holds up as well as the first couple tracks. I particularly like the first half of this 10-track collection, but the back half has a few gems as well, including the nostalgic &#8220;Fall of &#8217;82.&#8221; The Shins are a neat project by a guy who makes music I like. I&#8217;m glad I was able to remember that.</p>
<p><strong>Favorite Tracks:</strong> &#8220;The Rifle&#8217;s Spiral,&#8221; &#8220;Simple Song,&#8221; &#8220;Fall of &#8217;82&#8243;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=5255</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lock and Roll</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5825</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5825#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 23:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dr. John &#8211; Locked Down Why would I have any interest in the latest album from an artist I was never that big a fan of in the first place? I like some of Dr. John&#8217;s hits, I have the In the Right Place album and I was content with that. Then somehow I heard [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/cover1.jpeg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Dr. John &#8211; <em>Locked Down</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Why would I have any interest in the latest album from an artist I was never that big a fan of in the first place? I like some of Dr. John&#8217;s hits, I have the <em>In the Right Place</em> album and I was content with that. Then somehow I heard a cut off of <em>Locked Down</em> and was impressed by how retro it sounded. In my experience whenever you get the latest from an artist who&#8217;s been around for awhile it does whatever it can to sound contemporary. <em>Locked Down</em> on the other hand uses tons of retro sounds and vintage instruments. It&#8217;s almost like Dr. John is trying to travel back in time on this one. I was curious as to why this sounded so different yet familiar and then it all made sense. <i>Locked Down</i> was produced/co-written by <em>Black Keys</em> frontman Dan Auerbach who also plays extensively on the album. </em></p>
<p>Listening to <em>Locked Down</em> now, it almost sounds too much like <em>The Black Keys</em>. Auerbach&#8217;s influence is awfully strong, so much so that I wonder if Dr. John even knew what was going on. I get the feeling at times that Auerbach may be carrying too much of load due to the fact that Dr. John just isn&#8217;t as sharp as he used to be. Then again that&#8217;s all just speculation, so I should probably just focus on the songs.</p>
<p>The songs on <em>Locked Down</em> are fairly standard bluesy, funk numbers. Dr. John&#8217;s Cajun drawl is still as stylish as ever and there some delightfully old school sounds surrounding him. I only wish there was more new to offer in the songwriting department. Most of the songs on <em>Locked Down</em> are likable enough, but too derivative of not only past artists, but of past Dr. John material.</p>
<p>All in all it was an interesting experiment. I never thought I&#8217;d check out anything by a post-seventies Dr. John, so that&#8217;s saying something. I know some critics have really enjoyed this new album, and I&#8217;m happy for them. I&#8217;m also glad to see that Dr. John can still be critically relevant in 2012. Still I am no more than mildly pleased with <em>Locked Down.</em></p>
<p><strong>Favorite Tracks:</strong> &#8221;Eleggua&#8221;, &#8220;Locked Down&#8221;, &#8220;Revolution&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=5825</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your Body is a Wasteland</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5819</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5819#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 22:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[M. Ward &#8211; A Wasteland Companion I don&#8217;t know why it took me as long as it did to check out an album by singer-songwriter M.Ward. I enjoy both his work with Zooey Deschanel in the band She &#38; Him and his work in the supergroup Monsters of Folk. A Wasteland Companion is M. Ward&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/mwardalbumcover.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">M. Ward &#8211; <em>A Wasteland Companion</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>I don&#8217;t know why it took me as long as it did to check out an album by singer-songwriter M.Ward. I enjoy both his work with Zooey Deschanel in the band <em>She &amp; Him</em> and his work in the supergroup <em>Monsters of Folk</em>. <em>A Wasteland Companion</em> is M. Ward&#8217;s seventh album and it does bear a lot of resemblance to his songs with those other groups, maybe even too much. <em>Wasteland</em> sounds like half of the songs here could of been done with <em>Monsters of Folk</em> and the other half with <em>She &amp; Him</em> and I was really hoping for something different.</p>
<p>M. Ward&#8217;s songs shift between folky and 60s style pop. I can hear that Ward is trying to diversify, but I would much rather have either a folk album or a pop rock album. I don&#8217;t feel like there&#8217;s any real direction here other than &#8220;I&#8217;m just going to throw together all the songs I haven&#8217;t used yet for my other projects.&#8221; Don&#8217;t get me wrong, there are some nice songs but some fairly forgettable ones as well.</p>
<p>I like M. Ward&#8217;s breathy vocals and laid-back disposition, apparently the only disposition he&#8217;s capable of. I just wish Ward would stop relying so heavily on Zooey Deschanel. Of course Zooey Deschanel sings on a couple songs that sound exactly like <em>She &amp; Him</em> songs. If I wanted to listen to <i>She &#038; Him</i>, I&#8217;d be listening to <em>She &amp; Him</em>. It&#8217;s crazy that even on an M. Ward solo album I still feel like I&#8217;m listening to some kind of group or collaboration.</em></p>
<p><em>A Wasteland Companion</em> is fine, but in the grand scheme of indie pop forgettable. Next time I&#8217;d like to see M. Ward focus most heavily on his 60s style songs, at least that&#8217;s what I like hearing him do the most. At least I now have a general idea of what he&#8217;s all about, so there&#8217;s one mystery solved.</p>
<p><strong>Favorite Tracks:</strong> &#8221;I Get Ideas&#8221;, &#8220;Me and My Shadow&#8221;, &#8220;Primitive Girl&#8221; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=5819</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>T3 14: Top 10 Rain Songs</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5694</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5694#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 23:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#8217;s that pitter-patter on the roof? Is it&#8230; Could it be&#8230; Top Ten Thursdays? It is! Like a proverbial downpour the discussion this week turned to a topic that is a big part of any Seattle native&#8217;s lifestyle: the rain. Specifically, songs about the rain. So warm up some moon waffles, cuddle up in bed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/t31.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><p>What&#8217;s that pitter-patter on the roof? Is it&#8230; Could it be&#8230; Top Ten Thursdays? It is! Like a proverbial downpour the discussion this week turned to a topic that is a big part of any Seattle native&#8217;s lifestyle: the rain. Specifically, songs about the rain. So warm up some moon waffles, cuddle up in bed like a big toasty cinnamon bun and listen to the storm of discussion.</p>
<p>Or not. I mean, the list is right after the break. I&#8217;m not going to stop you.</p>
<p><strong>Top Ways to Listen:</strong><br />
[<a href="http://www.itunes.com/podcast?id=501634977">iTunes</a>] Subscribe to T3 on iTunes<br />
[<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/toptenthursdays">RSS</a>] Subscribe to the T3 RSS feed<br />
[<a href="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Podcast_4-19-12.mp3">MP3</a>] Download the MP3</p>

<p><span id="more-5694"></span></p>
<p>10. Guns N&#8217; Roses &#8211; &#8220;November Rain&#8221;<br />
9. The Ronettes &#8211; &#8220;Walking in the Rain&#8221;<br />
8. Prince &#8211; &#8220;Purple Rain&#8221;<br />
7. BJ Thomas &#8211; &#8220;Raindrops Keep Fallin&#8217; on My Head&#8221;<br />
6. The Beatles &#8211; &#8220;Rain&#8221;<br />
5. Randy Newman &#8211; &#8220;Louisiana 1927&#8243;<br />
4. The Doors &#8211; &#8220;Riders on the Storm&#8221;<br />
3. Gene Kelly &#8211; &#8220;Singin&#8217; in the Rain&#8221;<br />
2. Bob Dylan &#8211; &#8220;Shelter from the Storm&#8221;<br />
1. Creedence Clearwater Revival &#8211; &#8220;Have You Ever Seen the Rain&#8221; / &#8220;Who&#8217;ll Stop the Rain&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=5694</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Podcast_4-19-12.mp3" length="28588326" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>t3</itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:subtitle>What&#039;s that pitter-patter on the roof? Is it... Could it be... Top Ten Thursdays? It is! Like a proverbial downpour the discussion this week turned to a topic that is a big part of any Seattle native&#039;s lifestyle: the rain. Specifically,</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>What&#039;s that pitter-patter on the roof? Is it... Could it be... Top Ten Thursdays? It is! Like a proverbial downpour the discussion this week turned to a topic that is a big part of any Seattle native&#039;s lifestyle: the rain. Specifically, songs about the rain. So warm up some moon waffles, cuddle up in bed like a big toasty cinnamon bun and listen to the storm of discussion.

Or not. I mean, the list is right after the break. I&#039;m not going to stop you.

Top Ways to Listen:
[iTunes] Subscribe to T3 on iTunes
[RSS] Subscribe to the T3 RSS feed
[MP3] Download the MP3





10. Guns N&#039; Roses - &quot;November Rain&quot;
9. The Ronettes - &quot;Walking in the Rain&quot;
8. Prince - &quot;Purple Rain&quot;
7. BJ Thomas - &quot;Raindrops Keep Fallin&#039; on My Head&quot;
6. The Beatles - &quot;Rain&quot;
5. Randy Newman - &quot;Louisiana 1927&quot;
4. The Doors - &quot;Riders on the Storm&quot;
3. Gene Kelly - &quot;Singin&#039; in the Rain&quot;
2. Bob Dylan - &quot;Shelter from the Storm&quot;
1. Creedence Clearwater Revival - &quot;Have You Ever Seen the Rain&quot; / &quot;Who&#039;ll Stop the Rain&quot;</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Mildly Pleased</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>1:59:06</itunes:duration>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Ten Stoner Characters</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5761</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5761#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 21:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Ten]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In honor of 4/20 I thought it might be far out to do a post on my favorite stoner characters. Seems kind of strange considering I&#8217;ve never done any drugs myself but that doesn&#8217;t mean I can&#8217;t appreciate the humor that can come from drug culture. So here are my favorite TV and movie pushers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In honor of 4/20 I thought it might be far out to do a post on my favorite stoner characters. Seems kind of strange considering I&#8217;ve never done any drugs myself but that doesn&#8217;t mean I can&#8217;t appreciate the humor that can come from drug culture. So here are my favorite TV and movie pushers and potheads, man.<br />
<span id="more-5761"></span><br />
<b>Honorable Mention</b><br />
<b>- Floyd (True Romance)</b> &#8211; Brad Pitt plays a guy who&#8217;s sole existence is doing drugs and sleeping on a couch. Floyd is funny but his role was too small a role. for my list. </p>
<p><b>- Harold and Kumar (Harold and Kumar Go to White Castle)</b> &#8211; I&#8217;ve seen the first H&#038;K movie and I&#8217;ll admit it&#8217;s kind of funny, but I&#8217;ve never found the two characters that unique or interesting. </p>
<p><b>- Leo (That 70s Show)</b> Very funny, but derivative of another more iconic role on this list played by the same actor. </p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=5764" rel="attachment wp-att-5764"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/doug-stoned-479x319.jpg" alt="" title="doug-stoned" width="479" height="315" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-5764" /></a><b>10. Doug Wilson (Weeds)<br />
Portrayed by: Kevin Nealon</b><br />
Doug Wilson is self-absorbed, irresponsible, immature, and my favorite character on the Showtime series <i>Weeds</I>. A show about the misadventures of drug dealing suburban mom Nancy Botwin (Mary Louise Parker), Kevin Nealon plays accountant/city councilman Doug Wilson a frequent customer of Nancy. Early on Doug is a character that appears to have few concerns but to satisfy his own drug fueled desires. Though as Doug&#8217;s life falls apart later in the series he soon finds himself searching for any kind of high to numb the pain of a midlife crisis. </p>
<p>What makes Doug an entertaining stoner character? I think hilarity can simply be drawn from the fact that he&#8217;s a middle aged guy who still acts like a college frat boy. Doug is a funny stoner character because like so many of these characters he has no shame. I mean who else would smoke a bong in a tent at children&#8217;s rock concert? Maybe some of the other guys on this list. </p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=5771" rel="attachment wp-att-5771"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/2008_pineapple_express_006-479x318.jpg" alt="" title="PINEAPPLE EXPRESS" width="479" height="318" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-5771" /></a><b>9. Saul Silver (Pineapple Express)<br />
Portrayed by: James Franco</b><br />
Looking back it&#8217;s surprising that it took James Franco as long as it did to do a stoner comedy. Franco has always had that laid back quality, so playing a laid back stoner was a perfect fit for him. Saul is mellow, easily amused, and has a strange appreciation for civil engineers. <i>Pineapple Express</I> is an intriguing comedy as it combines stoners with action which is surprisingly effective entertainment. Saul may not be one of the most original movie stoners but he had some hilarious dialogue and was played to a tee by Franco. </p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=5780" rel="attachment wp-att-5780"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Vlcsnap-74924-479x269.png" alt="" title="Vlcsnap-74924" width="479" height="269" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-5780" /></a><b>8. Norvile &#8220;Shaggy&#8221; Rogers (Scooby Doo)<br />
Portrayed by: Casey Kasem</b><br />
Shaggy may be the most iconic character on this list but his status as a stoner is a little bit of a gray area. I mean he&#8217;s a character in a kid&#8217;s show for god&#8217;s sake! But let&#8217;s look at the facts. Here we have a giddy hippie who always had the munchies and talked to a Dog while riding around the in the back of a van solving mysteries. Additionally, this show began in the late 60s which was arguably the height of drug culture. Sure, this is all just speculation but I&#8217;d still put Shaggy on the list either way. Shaggy simply embodies all the characteristics associated with funny stoner characters.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard rumors that there is an episode or episodes where you can see smoke coming out of the Mystery Machine. I can find no evidence of this so-called smoke, but if someone does please let me know, that would be hilarious. </p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=5783" rel="attachment wp-att-5783"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/towelie-intervention-sp.jpg" alt="" title="towelie-intervention-sp" width="430" height="321" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-5783" /></a><b>7. Towelie (South Park)<br />
Portrayed by: Vernon Chatman</b><br />
Originally created by Trey Parker and Matt Stone in repsponse to the over commercialism of <i>South Park</I>, Towelie is just that… A stupid, catch phrase spouting Towel who for some reason always wants to get high. There isn&#8217;t any real reason for Towelie to be a stoner, it&#8217;s just funny because of how stupid it is. Towelie simply fills a void of randomness well suited for a stoner character and that&#8217;s funny, at least sometimes it is. Towelie really hasn&#8217;t been as funny as he was in his debut episode, but I blame that more on the decline of show. If anything he reminds us the importance of keeping dry and getting high. </p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=5786" rel="attachment wp-att-5786"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/jessee.jpg" alt="" title="jessee" width="460" height="307" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-5786" /></a><b>6. Jesse Pinkman (Breaking Bad)<br />
Portrayed by: Aaron Paul</b><br />
Looking at the other  stoner characters I&#8217;ve selected for this list I think Jesse is easily the most realistic. I could definitely imagine a meth-dealing black sheep like Jesse existing in reality. With his slacker persona and tendency to put &#8220;Yo&#8221; in almost all of his sentences, Jesse provides humor in an otherwise dark and brooding show. Of course Jesse has his own demons and addictions that provide some powerful drama as well. </p>
<p>Do to the fact that he&#8217;s a character on a well written drama series, Jesse is probably the most rounded and complex character on this list. Though as much as I like Aaron Paul&#8217;s performance on <i>Breaking Bad</I>, I decided to lean more towards comedic characters for this list. I mean that&#8217;s usually the main appeal of stoner characters right? They make us laugh, yo. </p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=5793" rel="attachment wp-att-5793"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/David-Wooderson-479x267.jpg" alt="" title="David Wooderson" width="479" height="267" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-5793" /></a><b>5. David Wooderson (Dazed and Confused)<br />
Portrayed by: Matthew McConaughey</b><br />
Just about everyone in the movie <i>Dazed and Confused</I> is a stoner, but none of them are quite as memorable as Wooderson. Played by real-life cannabis enthusiast Matthew McConaughey, Wooderson is that creepy kind of guy that graduates from high school but never leaves. What makes Wooderson such a memorable stoner character is probably more than anything his line delivery. With his slow Texas drawl Wooderson delivers some of the dumbest and therefore best lines of the movie.</p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=5796" rel="attachment wp-att-5796"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Jay-and-silent-bob-479x311.jpg" alt="" title="Jay-and-silent-bob" width="479" height="311" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-5796" /></a><b>4. Jay and Silent Bob (Kevin Smith&#8217;s Askewniverse)<br />
Portrayed by: Jason Mewes and Kevin Smith</b><br />
&#8220;Schmokin weed, schmokin wiz, doin&#8217; coke, drunken beers, drunken beers, beers, beers&#8230;&#8221; That song alone from <i>Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back</I> nab Jay and Silent Bob a spot on this list. Known for selling drugs outside a convenient store in Jersey, Jay and his &#8220;hetero-life mate&#8221; Bob have certainly seen their share of stoner comedy misadventures. Jay and Silent Bob even have their own comic book counterpart characters aptly named &#8220;Bluntman and Chronic&#8221; featured in the movies <i>Chasing Amy</I> and heavily in <i>Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back</I>. Even though they were clean and found god by the time of <i>Clerks II</i>, they will always live on as some of the most famous loiterers ever captured on film. </p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=5799" rel="attachment wp-att-5799"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/jeff-spicoli-479x316.jpg" alt="" title="jeff spicoli" width="479" height="316" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-5799" /></a><b>3. Jeff Spicoli (Fast Times at Ridgemont High)<br />
Portrayed by: Sean Penn</b><br />
On a list of character&#8217;s with poor motor functions, Spicoli may be the most fried. This California surfer type is a character that you would imagine being a moron if he wasn&#8217;t stoned, drugs simply enhance his stupidity. Whether he&#8217;s crashing the car of the high school football star or ordering pizza in class, Spicoli always seems to occupy the same laid back state of mind. He&#8217;s not only one of my favorite stoner characters but one of my favorite comedy movie characters in general. I mean he saved a drowning Brook Shields and hired Van Halen to play at his birthday, how cool is that? </p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=5802" rel="attachment wp-att-5802"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/BigLebowski-BIG-479x277.jpg" alt="" title="BigLebowski-BIG" width="479" height="277" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-5802" /></a><b>2. Jeffrey &#8220;The Dude&#8221; Lebowski (The Big Lebowski)<br />
Portrayed by: Jeff Bridges</b><br />
The poster child for movie slackers, The Dude is another iconic stoner character. What I love about The Dude is that he never loses his cool despite that fact that he lives a pretty pathetic life. The Dude loves the simple things; bowling, white russians, his rug, driving around, and of course having the occasional acid flashback. The Dude shows what a longterm stoner lifestyle can do for someone, and even though it has it&#8217;s definite downsides, The Dude abides. </p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=5807" rel="attachment wp-att-5807"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/upinsmoke-479x267.jpg" alt="" title="upinsmoke" width="479" height="267" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-5807" /></a><b>1. Cheech and Chong (Up in Smoke)<br />
Portrayed by: Cheech Marin and Tommy Chong</b><br />
Of course these guys had to be number one, they basically created the whole stoner comedy genre. So much of their comedy is fueled by and focused around sweet Mary Jane that they&#8217;ve become the thing of stoner legends. Beginning in the early 70s with a string of comedy albums, Cheech and Chong reached their apex in 1978 with the comedy <i>Up in Smoke</I>. In the film, each actor takes on personas that are both stupid and genius at the same time. Cheech Marin plays Pedro De Pacas an over-the-top Mexican American stereotype and Tommy Chong plays the practically brain-dead character known as &#8220;Man&#8221;. The film was panned, which is not surprising as it doesn&#8217;t have much of a plot, but it&#8217;s become a cult classic and some of the bits are hilarious. </p>
<p>One of my favorite scenes goes like this;<br />
Man: Hey, hey don&#8217;t take those, man.<br />
Pedro: &#8230;Wha?<br />
Man: I almost gave you the wrong shit, man.<br />
Pedro: Hey, man, I already took &#8216;em, man.<br />
Man: (laughs) Hoo hoo hoo…<br />
Pedro: Hey, whaddaya mean &#8220;ho ho ho&#8221;?<br />
Man Oh&#8230; HU-WOW, MAN!<br />
Pedro: Hey, what was in that shit, man?<br />
Man: You just did the most acid I&#8217;ve ever seen anybody eat in my life!<br />
Pedro: Hey, man, I never had no acid before, man.<br />
Man: Jeez, I hope you&#8217;re not busy for about a month&#8230; </p>
<p>Not all of Cheech and Chong&#8217;s jokes may be that funny or even make that much sense, but that&#8217;s also why they are the ultimate stoner characters. Stoner comedy should be kind of mess because that&#8217;s what it&#8217;s like being stoned, alright, alright. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=5761</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Vault: Wakeboarding Unleashed Featuring Shaun Murray</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5745</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5745#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 23:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Vault]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wakeboarding Unleashed Featuring Shaun Murray (2003) Welcome to another edition of the vault, a segment devoted to nostalgia. This week I&#8217;ll be reviewing a PS2 game that I&#8217;d pined to play for years until I finally buckled down and bought it on Amazon. The game is Wakeboarding Unleashed Featuring Shaun Murray by Activision, the same [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/box.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><em>Wakeboarding Unleashed Featuring Shaun Murray </em>(2003)</span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Welcome to another edition of the vault, a segment devoted to nostalgia. This week I&#8217;ll be reviewing a PS2 game that I&#8217;d pined to play for years until I finally buckled down and bought it on Amazon. The game is <i>Wakeboarding Unleashed Featuring Shaun Murray</I> by Activision, the same studio that brought us the beloved <i>Tony Hawk Pro Skater</I> franchise. I&#8217;ve always been a big fan of the <i>THPS</I> series and just earlier this year became a fan of another past Activision title <i>Mat Hoffman&#8217;s Pro BMX</I> for the PS1. It all goes back years ago when I played a demo of this on a copy of <i>THPS 4</I>. In the demo you could only play one level accompanied by a loop of Molly Hatchet&#8217;s &#8220;Flirtin&#8217; with Disaster&#8221; but man was it fun. Though time went by and somehow I just forgot about it. So now that I&#8217;ve finally played through the game does it live it up to my expectations? Totally. </p>
<p><span id="more-5745"></span><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=5750" rel="attachment wp-att-5750"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/59127_full-479x359.jpg" alt="" title="59127_full" width="479" height="269" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-5750" /></a></p>
<p>What&#8217;s a wakeboarding game even like? I think it&#8217;s closest relative would probably be snowboarding games, yet there&#8217;s something about crashing against waves that I find so much more satisfying than snow. So you follow behind a boat, go off ramps, do tricks, but all with that delightful Activision touch. The controls are incredibly fluid and you can fall into it immediately. One of my favorite features is the ability to let go of the rope, giving you the opportunity to explore other parts of the levels momentarily or elaborate on tricks, but it all has be timed just right. The level design is another feature to <i>Wakeboarding Unleashed</I> that really keeps it interesting. You have the more standard levels like wide canyons and Venice then you get some crazier stuff like a flooded city or the jungles of Belize. The graphics hold up really well and the level design is intricately complex with plenty of secrets. </p>
<p>Putting all of what&#8217;s been said aside, there&#8217;s still some features here that bring my piss to a boil. Some of the challenges get pretty repetitive and there&#8217;s a great deal of difficulty to go along with that. One challenge I always hate is boat racing. Where the wakeboarding controls are smooth the boat challenges are incredibly clunky and unbelievably boring. Other difficult aspects stem from the level designs getting more and more complicated. Where collecting numbers in one combo may be easy in the first level it&#8217;s pretty tricky later on. I find myself replaying missions over and over again and for what? To get another level that can only offer me the same challenges but slightly harder. </p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=5755" rel="attachment wp-att-5755"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/fo13_wakeboard-479x359.jpg" alt="" title="fo13_wakeboard" width="479" height="269" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-5755" /></a></p>
<p>This is a game that&#8217;s fun to free-play for a couple of hours but can be frustrating if you care to unlock everything. Though I suppose if I had slightly better reflexes I&#8217;d probably enjoy this more. But why was this game so quickly forgotten? Because it&#8217;s about wakeboarding. Who really cares or knows anything about it? Is Shaun Murray a household name? The answer to these questions is; no one, nothing, and nope. It&#8217;s a bit of shame because this game is unique and worth a play. I&#8217;d recommend you check out this game if it was still 2003. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=5745</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>There&#8217;s Something in the Woods</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5279</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5279#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 02:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Cabin in the Woods Leave it to Joss Whedon to completely turn a genre on it&#8217;s head in the already acclaimed The Cabin in the Woods. Not since Scream has the horror genre been this deeply analyzed or even criticized in such a clever way, but The Cabin in the Woods takes that model [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/The-Cabin-in-the-Woods-poster-e1334457588540.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><em>The Cabin in the Woods</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Leave it to Joss Whedon to completely turn a genre on it&#8217;s head in the already acclaimed <em>The Cabin in the Woods</em>. Not since <em>Scream</em> has the horror genre been this deeply analyzed or even criticized in such a clever way, but <em>The Cabin in the Woods</em> takes that model and pushes it to new heights. Directed by <em>Cloverfield</em> writer Drew Goddard and written by Goddard and Whedon (both former collaborators on <em>Buffy the Vampire Slayer</em> and <em>Angel</em>), <em>The Cabin in the Woods</em> is an all-out, over-the-top, sendup of the horror genre.</p>
<p>Surprisingly, the first characters we are introduced to are two seemingly white-collar technicians played by Bradley Whitford and Richard Jenkins. These two work for a company that stages slasher-like killings or &#8220;rituals&#8221; for mysterious reasons. The victims of this particular ritual are five friends that all represent horror cliches, you have; the virgin (Kristen Connolly), the jock (Chris Hemsworth), the slut (Anna Hutchinson), the scholar (Jesse Williams), and the outcast stoner (Fran Kranz), all heading out to spend the weekend at a cabin in the woods.</p>
<p>Once at the cabin the technicians or &#8220;puppeteers&#8221; start to manipulate the group&#8217;s environment. Pheromones are released through vents to make them horny, bridges out of the woods are destroyed, even random items are placed in a basement to decide what kind of creature will come after the group, Bradley Whitford is disappointed it&#8217;s never a Merman. The reasoning behind all of this is explained slowly throughout the movie, but you have to see it to appreciate it.</p>
<p>What I enjoyed so very much about <em>The Cabin in the Woods</em> was the humor. The whole thing is so self-aware and cynical, it&#8217;s refreshing to get a horror movie that just makes fun of how serious so many other horror movies try to be. Whitford and Jenkins are easily the most entertaining characters, but I actually liked everyone. Fran Kranz delivers some big laughs as the group&#8217;s philosophical stoner and I liked seeing Chris Hemsworth slowly dissolve into a horror movie stereotype spouting out lines like, &#8220;I think we should split up to cover more ground.&#8221;</p>
<p>The last half hour is where this film really goes all out and I couldn&#8217;t have been happier. The final act is more or less a horror fan&#8217;s wet dream and yet it&#8217;s still so tongue and cheek that I believe anyone could enjoy it. I would recommend this film to anyone, not just horror fans because of the fact that it blurs the line between genres. <em>The Cabin in the Woods</em> is kind of in a league of it&#8217;s own and most definitely lived up to the hype created by nerds on the internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=5279</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>T3 13: Top 10 Ensemble Movies</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5275</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5275#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 19:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The holy weekend&#8217;s over, it&#8217;s Thursday and the gang&#8217;s all here! Our big cast of heroes got together to shoot the poop and let it all hang out. The topic of discussion? Ensemble movies. Those films that don&#8217;t rely on just one star, instead focusing on a whole group of characters. It sounded like a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/t31.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><p>The holy weekend&#8217;s over, it&#8217;s Thursday and the gang&#8217;s all here! Our big cast of heroes got together to shoot the poop and let it all hang out. The topic of discussion? Ensemble movies. Those films that don&#8217;t rely on just one star, instead focusing on a whole group of characters. It sounded like a really easy idea, but it quickly became clear that this is the most challenging top 10 so far.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t have the time for this super-sized show, you can check our list after the break.</p>
<p><strong>Top Ways to Listen:</strong><br />
[<a href="http://www.itunes.com/podcast?id=501634977">iTunes</a>] Subscribe to T3 on iTunes<br />
[<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/toptenthursdays">RSS</a>] Subscribe to the T3 RSS feed<br />
[<a href="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/podcast_4-12-12.mp3">MP3</a>] Download the MP3</p>

<p><span id="more-5275"></span></p>
<p>10. <em>Hannah and Her Sisters</em><br />
9. <em>The Right Stuff</em><br />
8. <em>The Seven Samurai</em><br />
7. <em>American Graffiti</em><br />
6. <em>The Royal Tenenbaums</em><br />
5. <em>Best in Show</em><br />
4. <em>Network</em><br />
3. <em>Airplane!</em><br />
2. <em>Pulp Fiction</em><br />
1. <em>12 Angry Men</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=5275</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Podcast_4-12-12.mp3" length="28588326" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>t3</itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:subtitle>The holy weekend&#039;s over, it&#039;s Thursday and the gang&#039;s all here! Our big cast of heroes got together to shoot the poop and let it all hang out. The topic of discussion? Ensemble movies. Those films that don&#039;t rely on just one star,</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>The holy weekend&#039;s over, it&#039;s Thursday and the gang&#039;s all here! Our big cast of heroes got together to shoot the poop and let it all hang out. The topic of discussion? Ensemble movies. Those films that don&#039;t rely on just one star, instead focusing on a whole group of characters. It sounded like a really easy idea, but it quickly became clear that this is the most challenging top 10 so far.

If you don&#039;t have the time for this super-sized show, you can check our list after the break.

Top Ways to Listen:
[iTunes] Subscribe to T3 on iTunes
[RSS] Subscribe to the T3 RSS feed
[MP3] Download the MP3





10. Hannah and Her Sisters
9. The Right Stuff
8. The Seven Samurai
7. American Graffiti
6. The Royal Tenenbaums
5. Best in Show
4. Network
3. Airplane!
2. Pulp Fiction
1. 12 Angry Men</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Mildly Pleased</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>1:59:06</itunes:duration>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Men Men Men Men Manly Men Men Men</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5265</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5265#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 22:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Men &#8211; Open Your Heart It&#8217;s hard to find a lot about a band that doesn&#8217;t have a wikipedia, but from what I know, The Men are a Brooklyn band who released their debut album in late 2011 and are already back with an album that finds them expanding on their punk-influenced aesthetic in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/the-men-open-your-heart.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">The Men &#8211; <em>Open Your Heart</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>It&#8217;s hard to find a lot about a band that doesn&#8217;t have a wikipedia, but from what I know, The Men are a Brooklyn band who released their debut album in late 2011 and are already back with an album that finds them expanding on their punk-influenced aesthetic in a more inviting and eclectic manner.  That kind of makes it sound like these guys have gone commercial, but on the contrary <em>Open Your Heart</em> is filled with the kind of sweaty candor that I usually find pretty irresistible.</p>
<p>Basically this was an album that I thought I was ready to fall in love with from the first listen, and though I have come around to more or less falling in love with this album, it was a little more difficult than I anticipated.  You see, <em>Open Your Heart</em> begins with &#8220;Turn It Around&#8221;, a balls-out rocker full of impassioned vocals and unhinged guitars, two things that tend to make me weak in the knees.  But from there the album more or less takes a left turn with each song, as it sees The Men applying their rough-and-tumble punk sound to a whole slew of different approaches, which needless to say left me struggling to cling on to one overarching sound that defines this band.</p>
<p>Now I see that it&#8217;s that kind of ready-for-anything dynamic that makes this such an incredibly fun album.  You see The Men taking on hardcore punk (&#8220;Animal&#8221;), echoey alt-country (&#8220;Country Song&#8221;), amped-up shoegaze (&#8220;Please Don&#8217;t Go Away&#8221;), while also taking a bunch of other twists and turns stylistically.  I suppose in this day and age it&#8217;s a bit jarring to hear an indie band that doesn&#8217;t stick to one distinct sound on each song, as well as being so defiantly raucous, but they inhibit all these different styles pretty darn well.  Really my only complaint is that <em>Open Your Heart</em> contains one or two too many lengthy instrumental interludes, but for the most part this is the kind of album that gets me excited about new music in general.</p>
<p>Favorite Tracks: &#8220;Turn It Around&#8221;, &#8220;Oscillation&#8221;, &#8220;Candy&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=5265</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dial M for Mr.</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5259</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5259#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 22:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lambchop &#8211; Mr. M So it&#8217;s been a while since I&#8217;ve posted on the blog, and that can basically be attributed to the heavy load of school and work that I&#8217;ve been burdened with the last few weeks.  But alas, this week marks my spring break, so I&#8217;ll try and unload a couple album reviews [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/lambchop-mrm.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Lambchop &#8211; <em>Mr. M</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>So it&#8217;s been a while since I&#8217;ve posted on the blog, and that can basically be attributed to the heavy load of school and work that I&#8217;ve been burdened with the last few weeks.  But alas, this week marks my spring break, so I&#8217;ll try and unload a couple album reviews I&#8217;ve been meaning to get out of the way.  The first comes from a Nashville band who apparently have been around since the &#8217;90s though I&#8217;d never heard of them before hearing good things about their most recent album, <em>Mr. M</em>.  It&#8217;s a slightly bizarre blend of a few different genres that don&#8217;t tend to be described as bizarre, and though it hasn&#8217;t left me feeling the need to delve into Lambchop&#8217;s back catalogue, it has provided me with some nice chill-out music.</p>
<p>From the opening moments of this album, you get a pretty good idea of what you&#8217;re in for, as &#8220;If Not I&#8217;ll Just Die&#8221; starts with this lush orchestral interlude before lead singer Kurt Wagner mutters &#8220;Don&#8217;t know what the fuck they&#8217;re talkin&#8217; &#8217;bout&#8221; in his distinctly garbled tone.  And from there on you get an interesting mix of these sweeping string arrangements that compliment a sound that&#8217;s very much indebted to country, folk, jazz and to the kind of lounge-y pop that defined guys like Burt Bacharach and Tony Bennett.  So it&#8217;s kind of an unorthodox mix, but one that I think works if you like your indie rock to be a bit old-fashioned, as I usually do.</p>
<p>I guess my big complaint is that I have a hard time listening to music that&#8217;s so unrelentingly mellow for long stretches of time, so I can&#8217;t deny that I tend to find myself tuning out a bit towards the last few songs on <em>Mr. M</em>.  Still, it&#8217;s an album that blends a nice collection of genres that I kind of wish I spent more time listening to, and it&#8217;s always nice when an artist reminds you that there are other worthwhile sounds out there worth exploring.</p>
<p>Favorite Tracks: &#8220;2B2&#8243;, &#8220;Gone Tomorrow&#8221;, &#8220;Mr. Met&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=5259</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>T3 12: Top 10 Reasons to Be Excited About the 2012 Mariners Season</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5248</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5248#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 22:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We couldn&#8217;t pass up an opportunity to record an episode in a real radio station, and thusly, we focused on a real radio topic: sports. As a band of Mariner fans, how could we resist talking about of favorite Seattle Mariners, especially after they were honored by opening the season in Japan? So, sure, the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/t31.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><p>We couldn&#8217;t pass up an opportunity to record an episode in a real radio station, and thusly, we focused on a real radio topic: sports. As a band of Mariner fans, how could we resist talking about of favorite Seattle Mariners, especially after they were honored by opening the season in Japan? So, sure, the Mariners may lose a lot, but that doesn&#8217;t mean we can&#8217;t get excited. Baseball&#8217;s back everybody! Please don&#8217;t sue us MLB!</p>
<p>List after the break.</p>
<p><strong>Top Ways to Listen:</strong><br />
[<a href="http://www.itunes.com/podcast?id=501634977">iTunes</a>] Subscribe to T3 on iTunes<br />
[<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/toptenthursdays">RSS</a>] Subscribe to the T3 RSS feed<br />
[<a href="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/podcast_4-5-12.mp3">MP3</a>] Download the MP3</p>

<p><span id="more-5248"></span></p>
<p>10. Chone Figgins<br />
9. Mike Carp<br />
8. Franklin Gutierrez<br />
7. The Big Three: Walker, Paxton, Hultzen<br />
6. It couldn&#8217;t get any worse&#8230;<br />
5. Ichiro!<br />
4. King Felix<br />
3. Dustin Ackley<br />
2. Justin Smoak<br />
1. Jesus Montero</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=5248</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/podcast_4-5-12.mp3" length="32555804" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>t3</itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:subtitle>We couldn&#039;t pass up an opportunity to record an episode in a real radio station, and thusly, we focused on a real radio topic: sports. As a band of Mariner fans, how could we resist talking about of favorite Seattle Mariners,</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>We couldn&#039;t pass up an opportunity to record an episode in a real radio station, and thusly, we focused on a real radio topic: sports. As a band of Mariner fans, how could we resist talking about of favorite Seattle Mariners, especially after they were honored by opening the season in Japan? So, sure, the Mariners may lose a lot, but that doesn&#039;t mean we can&#039;t get excited. Baseball&#039;s back everybody! Please don&#039;t sue us MLB!

List after the break.

Top Ways to Listen:
[iTunes] Subscribe to T3 on iTunes
[RSS] Subscribe to the T3 RSS feed
[MP3] Download the MP3





10. Chone Figgins
9. Mike Carp
8. Franklin Gutierrez
7. The Big Three: Walker, Paxton, Hultzen
6. It couldn&#039;t get any worse...
5. Ichiro!
4. King Felix
3. Dustin Ackley
2. Justin Smoak
1. Jesus Montero</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Mildly Pleased</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>1:07:49</itunes:duration>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>That Old Black Magic</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5187</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5187#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 21:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Magic City Magic City is the latest Period Drama series from the Starz Network. Premiering last Friday, Starz has made the first three episodes available on their site, unedited and for free. I&#8217;ve now watched all three episodes and here are some of my initial thoughts. Set in Miami, Florida in the late 1950s, Magic [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/magicCity-e1333488279258.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><em>Magic City</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><em>Magic City</em> is the latest Period Drama series from the Starz Network. Premiering last Friday, Starz has made the first three episodes available on their site, unedited and for free. I&#8217;ve now watched all three episodes and here are some of my initial thoughts. Set in Miami, Florida in the late 1950s, <em>Magic City</em> is about the operations of the fictional Miramar Playa Hotel, an upscale hotel located right on the sandy beaches of Miami. Isaac &#8220;Ike&#8221; Evans (Jeffrey Dean Morgan) is the central star of the series and the owner of the hotel, though his life may not be as glamourous as one would expect. Protesters are swarming the hotel in an effort to convince Ike to unionize and in response Ike turns to some shady people, specifically notorious gangster Ben Diamond (Danny Huston).</p>
<p>I like the setup, the location, the concept, but something about this seems all too familiar. If you haven&#8217;t already guessed it, I&#8217;m thinking about this show&#8217;s strikingly similarities to both <em>Boardwalk Empire</em> and <em>Mad Men</em>. Like <em>Boardwalk Empire</em> you have a man in power with ties to some questionable people and then just take out prohibition and replace it with labor reform, gambling, and other issues relevant to the time and setting. Next you just need to add a splash of nostalgia a la <em>Mad Men</em> with guys in suits sipping on cocktails and you have <em>Magic City</em>. Already I&#8217;ve noticed some harsh reactions by some viewers to this show&#8217;s obvious similarities to those more popular shows, but I think if you can just go into <i>Magic City</I> objectively and judge it on it&#8217;s writing and performances, you might enjoy it.</p>
<p>Personally, I love the time period and I&#8217;m glad to see that Starz has gone all out to make this show look authentic. The settings, locations, and costumes are all marvelous and beautifully photographed, but what about the rest of the show? I like that as well. It&#8217;s basically all the reasons I like <em>Mad Men</em> except darker. The only spot where I think it may be lacking at this point in time is the characters. I like them all but there hasn&#8217;t really been enough time to explore them thoroughly. After the first episode I really had no idea what kind of character Ike Evans was supposed to be. Is he a tyrannical businessman? Is he driven by greed or power? But three episodes in I&#8217;m finally starting to get a feel for him. Surprisingly he&#8217;s a fairly normal, caring family man, who just happens to turn to dark places to avoid failure. I think this is one of the cases where you really have to give the show time to let the characters grow and thus far it looks promising.</p>
<p>Other characters of note on <em>Magic City</em> are Olga Kurylenko as Ike&#8217;s exotic young wife Vera, Steven Strait as Ike&#8217;s playboy twentysomething son Stevie, Danny Huston as intimidating gangster Ben Diamond, and my personal favorite Alec Rocco as Ike&#8217;s light hearted father. With all that being said why should you watch <em>Magic City</em>? Well if you&#8217;re the type that enjoys a good period drama or crime drama then you might get a kick out of this, or maybe if you&#8217;re into <em>Mad Men</em>. Plus you can watch the first three episodes for FREE, there ain&#8217;t no better deal than that. I know I&#8217;m going to try and follow this series best as I can. After all I gotta support Kirkland, WA native Jeffrey Dean Morgan, we K-Towners stick together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=5187</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Get to Mars</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5183</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5183#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 15:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Carter The problem with adapting the John Carter of Mars series of books is that everyone&#8217;s already stolen all of the best scenes. As prolific as the original works were, their influence so obviously and completely permeates the history of sci fi cinema that seeing it in its original context feels weird. The sith [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/john-carter-poster-e1333291466171.jpeg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><em>John Carter</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/5.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>The problem with adapting the <em>John Carter of Mars</em> series of books is that everyone&#8217;s already stolen all of the best scenes. As prolific as the original works were, their influence so obviously and completely permeates the history of sci fi cinema that seeing it in its original context feels weird. The sith aren&#8217;t weird insects, their followers of the dark side of the force. Don&#8217;t try to Jedi mind trick me, I know my sith. But, if you&#8217;re able to overcome your biases and appreciate the film <em>John Carter</em> on its own merits, I think you&#8217;ll see it&#8217;s not just the best movie this year, it&#8217;s one of the best ever.</p>
<p>Like all great adventures, <em>John Carter</em> begins with our hero; solitary, damaged by past atrocities. A veteran of the Civil War, John Carter roams the land aimless, with little will to live. That&#8217;s when Bryan Cranston happens upon him, in that infamous scene when he tries to recruit Carter to him team. He&#8217;s unsuccessful, but he does at least corner John Carter in a bar. It is at that moment that Carter, misreading the sign that says &#8220;Barsoom&#8221; as &#8220;barroom,&#8221; accidentally runs through a portal to Mars.</p>
<p>Upon arriving at the red planet, John Carter immediately discovers that the difference in gravity has given him super jumping ability, sort of like Superman before Superman just started flying everywhere. This power is so appealing to him that he starts bounding across the barren wasteland that is the planet, leaping like the king of kangaroos. He continues picking up speed and height, and soon enough is circumnavigating the globe in mere seconds. Eventually, he reverses Mars&#8217; rotation, throwing the planet, and himself back in time.</p>
<p>John Carter decides to land and survey the damage he has done. He finds Mars populated by a green, four-armed people. Realizing he has to be careful, John Carter tries his best to blend in and not alter the future. This is when he runs into Willem Dafoe, a Martian scientist who has been developing a time traveling machine. John Carter considers himself lucky, until Willem Dafoe tells him that to go back to the future, he&#8217;d have to enroll in Mars High School and convince young Bryan Cranston to fall in love with his mom. That&#8217;s when John Carter realizes that Bryan Cranston was his dad and he was trying to help him all along!</p>
<p>John Carter meets young Bryan Cranston and convinces him to date his mom, only to find out that she&#8217;s been kidnapped on a diplomatic mission. So John Carter, Bryan Cranston and Willem Dafoe head off to rescue her from British space nazis. Along the way, a Martian beast monster attacks them while at the same time their ship&#8217;s AI betrays them. In a lucky turn of events, the AI accidentally blows the monster out of the airlock, giving John Carter the chance he needed to rip out its motherboards and shit.</p>
<p>The trio get to the bad guy space base and rescue John Carter&#8217;s mom. She&#8217;s spunky, making fun of John Carter&#8217;s height, much to his chagrin. As they make their daring escape, Willem Dafoe ends up fighting with and getting killed by Mark Strong. John Carter is very upset about this until Mark Strong reveals the big twist: he&#8217;s John Carter&#8217;s real father, and the evil space base is actually a time machine he built so his son could go home. But the only way to activate it is to shoot a pinpoint weakness in its outside.</p>
<p>John Carter gets in his alphabet-themed starfighter and flies around the base. He gets caught in a dangerous dogfight with Dominic West, until Bryan Cranston arrives and saves the day. This is when he yells him infamous catchphrase, &#8220;Never give up, never surrender. The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one.&#8221; So John Carter uses his magic to fire a shot that someone curves downward into the hole, activating the time machine and sending him home&#8230;</p>
<p>Or so he thinks! John Carter wakes up in a mysterious pod, unplugging weird cables that were plugged into him. He looks around and sees that there are millions of similar pods all around him, as if all of mankind has been turned into living batteries. John Carter is dumped out of the pod into some weird pool, and prepares to die. Suddenly, a spaceship appears and lifts him out of the water. There, he meets Samuel L. Jackson, wearing an eyepatch, who tells him he&#8217;s putting a team together.</p>
<p>Needless to say, John Carter is an amazing movie and I can&#8217;t wait for the sequel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=5183</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Finish the Fight</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5144</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5144#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 02:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mass Effect 3 Commander Shepard certainly was aptly named. Over the course of the Mass Effect series, the Commander has continually grown her flock, enlisting the support of politicians, soldiers and organizations. Mass Effect 3 poses her biggest challenge, a threat so big she can no longer win with a small team. Instead, she must [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/me3-e1332839302666.jpeg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><em>Mass Effect 3</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Commander Shepard certainly was aptly named. Over the course of the <em>Mass Effect</em> series, the Commander has continually grown her flock, enlisting the support of politicians, soldiers and organizations. <em>Mass Effect 3</em> poses her biggest challenge, a threat so big she can no longer win with a small team. Instead, she must rally the entire galaxy to her cause. Yes, the Reapers are coming and the fate of sentient life hangs in the balance.<br />
<span id="more-5144"></span><br />
<a href="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/screenshot-008-o.jpeg"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/screenshot-008-o-479x269.jpg" alt="" title="screenshot-008-o" width="479" height="269" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-5180" /></a></p>
<p>Bioware always said that <em>Mass Effect</em> would be a trilogy, and this third game exists mainly to pay off all the big tensions of the series. That means just about every character you care about (who&#8217;s still alive) will show up in some capacity to help Shepard, which, if you care about this story, is pretty awesome. Sure, it does feel way too coincidental, but the alternative &#8211; them not showing up &#8211; would be significantly more disappointing. There is a pervasive sense of desperation and finality to <em>Mass Effect 3</em>, and getting to see everyone again, to take my romance to its conclusion, to cement alliances and friendships, was pretty great.</p>
<p>Really, where the story steers wrong is the new stuff. The new party members are all right, but not as interesting as the amazing collection of heroes we got is <em>Mass Effect 2</em>. There&#8217;s been a shockingly vocal and negative response to <em>Mass Effect 3</em>&#8216;s ending, which I can sympathize with, but think is going way too far. There&#8217;s a new character that ends up being the crux of the game&#8217;s final moments who was never handled well at all. Maybe I&#8217;m used to living with disappointing finales after shows like <em>Lost</em>, <em>Battlestar Galactica</em> and <em>Seinfeld</em>, but the end of this game didn&#8217;t bother me that much. Nothing could live up to the expectations set by <em>Mass Effect 2</em>, but I was pretty content with this being the end of this saga. I certainly didn&#8217;t want to file a complaint with the FTC.</p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/screenshot-054-p.jpeg"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/screenshot-054-p-479x269.jpg" alt="" title="screenshot-054-p" width="479" height="269" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-5177" /></a></p>
<p>Playing <em>Mass Effect</em> continues to swing further toward the shooter side than the RPG side, with the introduction of turret sequences and the return of the ability for every class to use all the weapons. I hear a lot of people complain about the gameplay in this series and I think they all must play as soldiers, because yeah, if you just shoot people, play like <em>Gears of War</em>, it&#8217;s not going to fare well. But I played as a vanguard and was constantly flying around levels, blowing enemies up and hardly ever shooting, and I had a great time. Then I played the game again as an adept, freezing and throwing my enemies around with mind powers and had even more fun. The use of powers and squad tactics elevates this game into its own category of gameplay, and I love it.</p>
<p>While armor management is the same as the last game, weapons are once again individually upgradable and compatibile with a variety of mods. There&#8217;s a ton of weapon variety, perhaps too much, but it pretty much guarantees everyone will find at least one gun they like. Side quests have been changed into mostly fetch quests for people who Shepard hears complaining about needing something. Scanning was dumbed down to just one item per planet. It&#8217;s weird that side quests are even in here at all, since everything is so desperate and it just feels weird for Shepard to waste her time on these mundane concerns.</p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/screenshot-027-o.jpeg"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/screenshot-027-o-479x269.jpg" alt="" title="screenshot-027-o" width="479" height="269" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-5176" /></a></p>
<p>Also somewhat controversially, <em>Mass Effect 3</em> introduces multiplayer into the series. To motivate players to hop online, Bioware rewards people who play online with a boost to single player preparedness, meaning how easy it is to get what I imagine is the best ending. If you play enough, you could probably get to the ending without completing a single side quest. If you don&#8217;t play any, you&#8217;ll have to do damn near all of them.</p>
<p>But that wasn&#8217;t an issue for me, since I enjoy playing these games and relished to opportunity to compare my skills against others. There&#8217;s only one mode to play in, a team wave-based affair akin to <em>Gears of War</em>&#8216;s Horde Mode. Really, the only thing I don&#8217;t like about multiplayer is that it doesn&#8217;t feel deep enough. You play as all the classes and a variety of races, but you can never customize their appearance beyond coloring them. More importantly, you can&#8217;t choose what you want to unlock. Instead, you spend your in-game (or real-life) money on booster packs, like a card game, randomly getting unlocks you probably don&#8217;t want. I&#8217;ve played a ton of multiplayer and still haven&#8217;t gotten the Asari Adept card, meaning I can&#8217;t play the one class I really want to. And forget about getting the weapon you want, unless you play a ton or throw down some serious paper.</p>
<p><em>Mass Effect 3</em> is a lot of things to a lot of different people. For me, it was a solid conclusion to one of the best franchises this generation, maybe ever. I&#8217;m more certain than ever that <em>Mass Effect 2</em> is one of my favorite games of all time. And this whole experience, this five-year journey were every choice I made, every shot I fired counted and stayed with me from game-to-game, is one I&#8217;m am infinitely happy that I got to experience. The <em>Mass Effect</em> trilogy is one-of-a-kind, not just among games, among all media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=5144</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>T3 11: Top 10 Albums of 1967</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5154</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5154#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 03:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In honor of the beloved Mad Men, this week is all about 1967. Because that&#8217;s when the current season of the show is set. Probably. That show&#8217;s not really that explicit about anything. But what is explicit is this podcast, because the groovy conversation is all about the most awesome albums of 1967. It&#8217;s a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/t31.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><p>In honor of the beloved <em>Mad Men</em>, this week is all about 1967. Because that&#8217;s when the current season of the show is set. Probably. That show&#8217;s not really that explicit about anything. But what is explicit is this podcast, because the groovy conversation is all about the most awesome albums of 1967. It&#8217;s a little bit trippy, a little bit psychedelic, a lot a bit fun.</p>
<p>Spoilers after the break!</p>
<p><strong>Top Ways to Listen:</strong><br />
[<a href="http://www.itunes.com/podcast?id=501634977">iTunes</a>] Subscribe to T3 on iTunes<br />
[<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/toptenthursdays">RSS</a>] Subscribe to the T3 RSS feed<br />
[<a href="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/podcast_3-29-12.mp3">MP3</a>] Download the MP3</p>

<p><span id="more-5154"></span></p>
<p>10. The Moody Blues &#8211; <em>Days of Future Passed</em><br />
9. The Kinks &#8211; <em>Something Else By The Kinks</em><br />
8. The Who &#8211; <em>The Who Sell Out</em><br />
7. Moby Grape &#8211; <em>Moby Grape</em><br />
6. Cream &#8211; <em>Disraeli Gears</em><br />
5. The Doors &#8211; <em>The Doors</em><br />
4. The Jimi Hendrix Experience &#8211; <em>Are You Experienced</em><br />
3. Love &#8211; <em>Forever Changes</em><br />
2. The Velvet Underground &#8211; <em>The Velvet Underground and Nico</em><br />
1. The Beatles &#8211; <em>Sgt. Pepper&#8217;s Lonely Hearts Club Band</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=5154</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/podcast_3-29-12.mp3" length="40775389" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>t3</itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:subtitle>In honor of the beloved Mad Men, this week is all about 1967. Because that&#039;s when the current season of the show is set. Probably. That show&#039;s not really that explicit about anything. But what is explicit is this podcast,</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>In honor of the beloved Mad Men, this week is all about 1967. Because that&#039;s when the current season of the show is set. Probably. That show&#039;s not really that explicit about anything. But what is explicit is this podcast, because the groovy conversation is all about the most awesome albums of 1967. It&#039;s a little bit trippy, a little bit psychedelic, a lot a bit fun.

Spoilers after the break!

Top Ways to Listen:
[iTunes] Subscribe to T3 on iTunes
[RSS] Subscribe to the T3 RSS feed
[MP3] Download the MP3





10. The Moody Blues - Days of Future Passed
9. The Kinks - Something Else By The Kinks
8. The Who - The Who Sell Out
7. Moby Grape - Moby Grape
6. Cream - Disraeli Gears
5. The Doors - The Doors
4. The Jimi Hendrix Experience - Are You Experienced
3. Love - Forever Changes
2. The Velvet Underground - The Velvet Underground and Nico
1. The Beatles - Sgt. Pepper&#039;s Lonely Hearts Club Band</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Mildly Pleased</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>1:24:56</itunes:duration>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>To Kill a Mockingjay</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5145</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5145#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 14:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Hunger Games Human sacrifice was a big part of a lot of cultures for a long time. Sure, now it sounds rather gaouche, but that&#8217;s because we live in slightly more sophisticated times. The Hunger Games is set in the future and it sounds like we can at least look forward to human sacrifice [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/hungergames-e1332839476297.jpeg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><em>The Hunger Games</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Human sacrifice was a big part of a lot of cultures for a long time. Sure, now it sounds rather gaouche, but that&#8217;s because we live in slightly more sophisticated times. <em>The Hunger Games</em> is set in the future and it sounds like we can at least look forward to human sacrifice coming back in vogue. Here, 24 kids, aged 12-18, are taken to battle to the death in a futuristic arena to remind the population and, of course, make the best damn reality show ever. Because nothing says entertainment like an 18-year-old man fighting a 12-year-old girl.</p>
<p>It turns out there was some big war in North America, which left the world we know behind. Now the continent is run by the ruling class in the capitol city, with the rest of it (the losers in the war) divided into 12 districts and subjugated by capitol city peacekeepers. Every year, the city takes one boy and one girl from each district to compete in The Hunger Games battle royale, to remind the people who&#8217;s in charge and that revolution is a bad idea. Katniss (Jennifer Lawrence) comes from District 12, the poor coal mining district, and her getting sent to the games is basically a death sentence.</p>
<p>But she&#8217;s tough and spunky and makes a go of it. <em>The Hunger Games</em> is not a short movie, dedicating plenty of time to showing just how sick and bizarre this tradition is before giving us what everyone really wants, the bloodbath. There&#8217;s not much subtlety to the social commentary here, and the reality show set-up makes it difficult to read the characters. There&#8217;s a romance in the film that, at inception, is just an act to get audience sympathy. By the end of the film, it is not in anyway clear if that relationship transcended that or not. I never knew how anyone really felt or thought about what was going on.</p>
<p>I do give props to Jennifer Lawrence, who continues to prove herself one of the most talented young actors around. Katniss is tough and not very talkative, but Lawrence brings a lot more to her performance, giving us a window into her mind that I&#8217;m sure fans of the book didn&#8217;t need but someone like me appreciated. The rest of the cast is fine. Elizabeth Banks, Woody Harrelson and Stanley Tucci all play weird city-dwellers and look like they&#8217;re having fun with their ridiculous wigs and outfits. Donald Southerland&#8217;s in here too, although he felt more like a sequel setup character than anything else.</p>
<p>A few scenes from <em>The Hunger Games</em> stuck with me. There&#8217;s a great scene when a particularly sad death provokes a riot that I thought was well done and I hope is a sign of things to come in the sequel. All I was really looking for was some fun action, and I got it, eventually. Hell, the movie has enough pathos, I even want to read the book now. But if you haven&#8217;t read the book, don&#8217;t want to read the book, or won&#8217;t be dragged to the theater by people who read the book, you&#8217;d probably be safe letting <em>The Hunger Games</em> pass you by.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=5145</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Government Totally Sucks</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5158</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5158#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 20:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bruce Springsteen &#8211; Wrecking Ball The Boss has been in charge for almost forty years but he&#8217;s still got just as much piss and vinegar as ever. Springsteen has shown that he&#8217;s just as rough around the edges as ever on his latest album Wrecking Ball. Gone is the more optimistic vision of hope for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Wrecking-Ball-Now-Available-NJTechReviews.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Bruce Springsteen &#8211; <em>Wrecking Ball</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>The Boss has been in charge for almost forty years but he&#8217;s still got just as much piss and vinegar as ever. Springsteen has shown that he&#8217;s just as rough around the edges  as ever on his latest album <em>Wrecking Ball</em>. Gone is the more optimistic vision of hope for our country on <em>Working on Dream</em> as it has been replaced by a more grim outlook. <em>Wrecking Ball</em> tells us that now we got to fight for the American dream and it&#8217;s not gonna be pretty. Singing on behalf of the 99 percent and the downtrodden individuals of today&#8217;s economy, <em>Wrecking Ball</em> may be Springsteen&#8217;s angriest and most political record yet. Of course I&#8217;m always willing to rally behind the rock anthems of Springsteen, but I find that on <em>Wrecking Ball</em> the music has taken a backseat to the message.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m willing to listen to anyone who has the balls to speak out against corruption in business or government or &#8220;Corporate Fuck&#8221; as I like to so eloquently call it, I just wish Springsteen&#8217;s melodies were as inspired as the message. There are some epic musical moments here that really do hit like a wrecking ball, but even on a third listen it still blurs together. The lead single &#8220;We Take Care of Our Own&#8221; is my favorite with it&#8217;s catchy guitar hook and inspiring lyrics and the title track is another folksy pleasure, if not somewhat formulaic by Springsteen standards. Really I like everything here I just didn&#8217;t fall in love with it like I did with <em>Working on a Dream</em>.</p>
<p>I appreciate Springsteen fighting for the working man, but when that&#8217;s every track I&#8217;ll admit it gets a little tired. The album is certainly a more painful and powerful record but sometimes I prefer the Springsteen that sings about things like dancing in the dark and having a hungry heart. Of course I have to mention how <em>The E-Street Band</em> hasn&#8217;t been the same without saxophonist Clarence Clemons, he&#8217;s present on a few tracks here but it&#8217;s just not the same. Many critics have hailed <em>Wrecking Ball</em> as one of Springsteen&#8217;s best in years but I disagree. I liked both <em>Magic</em> and <em>Working on a Dream</em> more than <em>Wrecking Ball</em>, but that aside this is still a strong followup and worth checking out for fans of Springsteen or maybe even the American dream in general.</p>
<p><strong>Favorite Tracks:</strong> &#8220;Land of Hope and Dreams&#8221;, &#8220;Wrecking Ball&#8221; &#8220;We Take Care of Our Own&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=5158</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s Very Complicated</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5074</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5074#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 10:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5074</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SSX When it was announced, the new SSX game was called Deadly Descents. It looked to be a departure from what the extreme sports series was known for, and I was worried about the direction it was going in. In the many months between that first trailer and the game&#8217;s release, the retitled SSX reshaped [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/SSX-e1330686246297.jpeg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><em>SSX</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>When it was announced, the new <em>SSX</em> game was called <em>Deadly Descents</em>. It looked to be a departure from what the extreme sports series was known for, and I was worried about the direction it was going in. In the many months between that first trailer and the game&#8217;s release, the retitled <em>SSX</em> reshaped itself as both a  modern interpretation of the franchise and a return to what made it fun in the first place.</p>
<p>It begins with the formation of a team called SSX, for Snow, Surf, Motocross. Despite the name, SSX is all about snowboarding and doesn&#8217;t actually partake in the other events. So I guess chock that up on the big board of terrible backronyms. Anyway, one of the guys on the team betrays the others, who decide they have to conquer the world&#8217;s most dangerous mountains to win some contest that I think they just made up. Along the way, they add new members to the team. The characters run the gamut from French model who loves adventure to Hawaiian guy who loves adventure. The story unfolds in comic-style cinematics that aren&#8217;t particularly good and frankly, if your into this game for the story, your weird.</p>
<p>Events are broken up into three modes: Race It, Trick It and Survive It. The first two are obvious, you win races by getting to the bottom of the mountain fastest, you win trick contests by scoring the most points. But when you get to the legendary deadly descents, the final level in each mountain range, your only objective is survival. Each mountain has a gimmick that you&#8217;ll have to deal with; a particularly rocky mountain, for example, will require the use of body armor. This gets especially crazy with the introduction of active gear, like wing suits used to extend jumps and survive big gaps. It&#8217;s a neat addition that makes the game just that little bit fresher.</p>
<p>But what really helps is that there simply hasn&#8217;t been anything filling the <em>SSX</em> void since the last game came out. The tricks are as reality-defying as ever, the jumps as ridiculous, the sense of momentum as exhilarating. Most of the time I spent playing this game reminded me of my glory days playing <em>Tricky</em> and <em>SSX3</em> &#8211; and that&#8217;s not a bad thing at all. The original games&#8217; quirky control scheme even remains an option for those veteran players who are still comfortable playing like that, but I found the new controls perfectly functional.</p>
<p><em>SSX</em> lacks any real multiplayer, instead it chooses to follow the model established by <em>Need for Speed: Hot Pursuit</em> and put all the focus on leaderboards. Whenever you complete an event, you immediately get to compare your performance to your friends&#8217; and the rest of the world. What&#8217;s more, there are events that you can participate in for worldwide glory and in-game rewards. That&#8217;s right, if competing with your friends wasn&#8217;t enough, the game has its own currency, which you use to buy new gear for your characters, earning both cosmetic and gameplay bonuses. It&#8217;s all pretty slick and makes the game pretty addictive.</p>
<p>It wouldn&#8217;t be an <em>SSX</em> game without a great soundtrack and this new title does not disappoint. A mix of rap, electronic and rock will accompany you down the slopes that is just eclectic enough that I bet anyone will have at least one song that they love. As always, the music responds to how you&#8217;re playing, making the experience that much more cinematic. My favorite touch is the dubstep remix of Run DMC&#8217;s &#8220;It&#8217;s Tricky&#8221; that plays when you fill the tricky meter. That&#8217;s really this game in a nutshell. That familiar old song, remixed just enough to fit in 2012.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=5074</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>T3 10: Top 10 Movie Scores</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5136</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5136#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2012 04:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Top Ten Fridays Saturdays? That simply will not do. But tardiness is better than absence, so delayed but not deterred, T3 is here for you. This week the topic of choice is original movies scores, inspired by&#8230; uh&#8230; The Muppets DVD release? Now, surely you were looking for some sort of Hunger Games-related murder adventure [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/t31.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><p>Top Ten <del>Fridays</del> Saturdays? That simply will not do. But tardiness is better than absence, so delayed but not deterred, T3 is here for you. This week the topic of choice is original movies scores, inspired by&#8230; uh&#8230; <em>The Muppets</em> DVD release? Now, surely you were looking for some sort of <em>Hunger Games</em>-related murder adventure this week and you&#8217;re disappointed to hear everyone lives through the entire podcast (or do they?) but don&#8217;t worry, the stakes couldn&#8217;t be higher. After all, when was the last time you heard people talking about the best movie scores? I thought so. Give it a listen.</p>
<p>Or you could just look at the list after the break.</p>
<p><strong>Top Ways to Listen:</strong><br />
[<a href="http://www.itunes.com/podcast?id=501634977">iTunes</a>] Subscribe to T3 on iTunes<br />
[<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/toptenthursdays">RSS</a>] Subscribe to the T3 RSS feed<br />
[<a href="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/podcast_3-22-12.mp3">MP3</a>] Download the MP3</p>

<p><span id="more-5136"></span></p>
<p>10. <em>Batman</em> (Danny Elfman)<br />
9. <em>Gone with the Wind</em> (Max Steiner)<br />
8. <em>Jaws</em> (John Williams)<br />
7. <em>The Godfather</em> (Nino Rota)<br />
6. <em>Lawrence of Arabia</em> (Maurice Jarre)<br />
5. <em>Jurassic Park</em> (John Williams)<br />
4. <em>Vertigo</em> (Bernard Herrmann)<br />
3. <em>Raiders of the Lost Ark</em> (John Williams)<br />
2. <em>The Good, The Bad and The Ugly</em> (Ennio Morricone)<br />
1. <em>Star Wars</em> (John Williams)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=5136</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Podcast_3-22-121.mp3" length="39996395" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>t3</itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:subtitle>Top Ten Fridays Saturdays? That simply will not do. But tardiness is better than absence, so delayed but not deterred, T3 is here for you. This week the topic of choice is original movies scores, inspired by... uh... The Muppets DVD release? Now,</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Top Ten Fridays Saturdays? That simply will not do. But tardiness is better than absence, so delayed but not deterred, T3 is here for you. This week the topic of choice is original movies scores, inspired by... uh... The Muppets DVD release? Now, surely you were looking for some sort of Hunger Games-related murder adventure this week and you&#039;re disappointed to hear everyone lives through the entire podcast (or do they?) but don&#039;t worry, the stakes couldn&#039;t be higher. After all, when was the last time you heard people talking about the best movie scores? I thought so. Give it a listen.

Or you could just look at the list after the break.

Top Ways to Listen:
[iTunes] Subscribe to T3 on iTunes
[RSS] Subscribe to the T3 RSS feed
[MP3] Download the MP3





10. Batman (Danny Elfman)
9. Gone with the Wind (Max Steiner)
8. Jaws (John Williams)
7. The Godfather (Nino Rota)
6. Lawrence of Arabia (Maurice Jarre)
5. Jurassic Park (John Williams)
4. Vertigo (Bernard Herrmann)
3. Raiders of the Lost Ark (John Williams)
2. The Good, The Bad and The Ugly (Ennio Morricone)
1. Star Wars (John Williams)</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Mildly Pleased</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>1:23:20</itunes:duration>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Kids on the Block</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5115</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5115#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 01:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[21 Jump Street The first big comedy of the year has hit and despite sounding like a lazy rehash of an old TV show it&#8217;s anything but. 21Jump Street, adapted from the 80s cop drama of the same name is now a raunchy comedy film starring Channing Tatum and a not-quite-fat but not-quite-thin Jonah Hill. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/21jumpstreetposter-e1332207227543.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><em>21 Jump Street</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>The first big comedy of the year has hit and despite sounding like a lazy rehash of an old TV show it&#8217;s anything but. <em>21Jump Street</em>, adapted from the 80s cop drama of the same name is now a raunchy comedy film starring Channing Tatum and a not-quite-fat but not-quite-thin Jonah Hill. Also co-written by Jonah Hill, <em>21 Jump Street</em> runs away with a premise full of limitless comedic possibilities and delivers on both the laughs and action that we as moviegoers all crave.</p>
<p>Schmidt (Hill) and Jenko (Tatum) are two youthful cops that despite their inabilities as successful officers are best friends. Growing up on different sides of the high school spectrum, Schmidt being a nerd and Jenko being cool, the two eventually accept each other&#8217;s differences when they both find themselves together in the police academy. After they complete their training, and after a comic misadventure as bike cops, the two immature officers find themselves in a secret program led by at the angry Capt. Dickson (Ice Cube) where young-looking officers go undercover at high schools, the location of this program&#8217;s facility? &#8220;21 Jump Street&#8221;. Thus Schmidt and Jenko find themselves undercover as students in attempt to bring down a burgeoning teenage drug circuit, hilarity ensues.</p>
<p>First off, I commend the filmmakers for avoiding the easy character route for Schmidt and Jenko. It would of been so easy to make them rivals, but I find it much more compelling for them to be best friends and for the drama to come from peer pressure straining their relationship. The characters are very likable and surprisingly have good chemistry together. I can honestly say this is the first time I&#8217;ve ever liked Channing Tatum, perhaps because his character is as dumb as a post and that a lot of humor can come from the fact that he looks much older than everyone else. Hill of course delivers as always, excelling as the insecure yet lovable Schmidt.</p>
<p>But perhaps the most appealing aspect in this films is that it&#8217;s not afraid to make fun of itself. There is even a scene where a police chief played by Nick Offerman says in regards to the program, &#8220;We&#8217;re reviving an old undercover-in-high-school program from the 1980s, because the only idea anyone can come up with now is to recycle shit from the past.&#8221; It really is refreshing to hear that kind of honesty in today&#8217;s landscape of remakes and reboots. Another great jab at the genre comes from a high speed chase where the characters keep expecting things to explode but then they don&#8217;t, you gotta see it to believe it.</p>
<p>Really there isn&#8217;t anything new about <em>21 Jump Street</em>, the makers would be the first ones to tell you that, but it&#8217;s inspiring to see someone take something tired and old and put some life into it. I think there will always be a certain appeal to raunchy high school movies and it&#8217;s always a treat to see a buddy cop film where you actually care about the friendship. Sounds like Sony Pictures has already given the green light for a <em>21 Jump Street</em> sequel, so it&#8217;ll only be a matter of time before were going back to school.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=5115</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>T3 09: Top 10 High School Movies</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5109</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5109#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 03:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The clocks have sprung forward, and that means school&#8217;s out for listing. As the gang gets excited for the highly anticipated 21 Jump Street, they look back at all the great high school movies they&#8217;ve seen, as well as a few they haven&#8217;t. They have a lot of fun, and if you&#8217;re not careful, you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/t31.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><p>The clocks have sprung forward, and that means school&#8217;s out for listing. As the gang gets excited for the highly anticipated <em>21 Jump Street</em>, they look back at all the great high school movies they&#8217;ve seen, as well as a few they haven&#8217;t. They have a lot of fun, and if you&#8217;re not careful, you might learn something too. But probably not. Unless you always wanted to learn about how good the song from <em>Mr. Holland&#8217;s Opus</em> is &#8211; which you didn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Take a look at the list after the break, or just listen to the podcast and have a better time. I swear to blog.</p>
<p><strong>Top Ways to Listen:</strong><br />
[<a href="http://www.itunes.com/podcast?id=501634977">iTunes</a>] Subscribe to T3 on iTunes<br />
[<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/toptenthursdays">RSS</a>] Subscribe to the T3 RSS feed<br />
[<a href="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/podcast_3-15-12.mp3">MP3</a>] Download the MP3</p>

<p><span id="more-5109"></span></p>
<p>10. <em>Back to the Future</em><br />
9. <em>Napoleon Dynamite</em><br />
8. <em>Ferris Bueller&#8217;s Day Off</em><br />
7. <em>The Breakfast Club</em><br />
6. <em>Juno</em><br />
5. <em>Election</em><br />
4. <em>Rushmore</em><br />
3. <em>Dazed and Confused</em><br />
2. <em>Fast Times at Ridgemont High</em><br />
1. <em>Superbad</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=5109</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/podcast_3-15-12.mp3" length="33163934" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>t3</itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:subtitle>The clocks have sprung forward, and that means school&#039;s out for listing. As the gang gets excited for the highly anticipated 21 Jump Street, they look back at all the great high school movies they&#039;ve seen, as well as a few they haven&#039;t.</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>The clocks have sprung forward, and that means school&#039;s out for listing. As the gang gets excited for the highly anticipated 21 Jump Street, they look back at all the great high school movies they&#039;ve seen, as well as a few they haven&#039;t. They have a lot of fun, and if you&#039;re not careful, you might learn something too. But probably not. Unless you always wanted to learn about how good the song from Mr. Holland&#039;s Opus is - which you didn&#039;t.

Take a look at the list after the break, or just listen to the podcast and have a better time. I swear to blog.

Top Ways to Listen:
[iTunes] Subscribe to T3 on iTunes
[RSS] Subscribe to the T3 RSS feed
[MP3] Download the MP3





10. Back to the Future
9. Napoleon Dynamite
8. Ferris Bueller&#039;s Day Off
7. The Breakfast Club
6. Juno
5. Election
4. Rushmore
3. Dazed and Confused
2. Fast Times at Ridgemont High
1. Superbad</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Mildly Pleased</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>1:09:05</itunes:duration>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>T3 08: Top 10 SuperNES Games</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5086</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5086#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 05:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5086</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After dedicating so much brainpower to reliving the Nineties, it would seem like a waste to move forward in time without at least talking about another cultural icon: the Super Nintendo. Sure, it might not have the infamy or name recognition of the original Nintendo Entertainment System, but it&#8217;s hard not to respect the amazing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/t31.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><p>After dedicating so much brainpower to reliving the Nineties, it would seem like a waste to move forward in time without at least talking about another cultural icon: the Super Nintendo. Sure, it might not have the infamy or name recognition of the original Nintendo Entertainment System, but it&#8217;s hard not to respect the amazing library of games for Nintendo&#8217;s second home console. It&#8217;s our first and maybe only video game-centric podcast, enjoy it!</p>
<p>Or take the jump to not enjoy it!</p>
<p><strong>Top Ways to Listen:</strong><br />
[<a href="http://www.itunes.com/podcast?id=501634977">iTunes</a>] Subscribe to T3 on iTunes<br />
[<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/toptenthursdays">RSS</a>] Subscribe to the T3 RSS feed<br />
[<a href="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Podcast_3-8-12.mp3">MP3</a>] Download the MP3</p>

<p><span id="more-5086"></span></p>
<p>10. <em>Earthbound</em><br />
9. <em>Aladdin</em><br />
8. <em>Super Mario Kart</em><br />
7. <em>Super Mario World 2: Yoshi&#8217;s Island</em><br />
6. <em>The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past</em><br />
5. <em>Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles IV: Turtles in Time</em><br />
4. <em>Super Metroid</em><br />
3. <em>Mega Man X</em><br />
2. <em>Donkey Kong County</em><br />
1. <em>Super Mario World</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=5086</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Podcast_3-8-12.mp3" length="37789907" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>t3</itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:subtitle>After dedicating so much brainpower to reliving the Nineties, it would seem like a waste to move forward in time without at least talking about another cultural icon: the Super Nintendo. Sure, it might not have the infamy or name recognition of the ori...</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>After dedicating so much brainpower to reliving the Nineties, it would seem like a waste to move forward in time without at least talking about another cultural icon: the Super Nintendo. Sure, it might not have the infamy or name recognition of the original Nintendo Entertainment System, but it&#039;s hard not to respect the amazing library of games for Nintendo&#039;s second home console. It&#039;s our first and maybe only video game-centric podcast, enjoy it!

Or take the jump to not enjoy it!

Top Ways to Listen:
[iTunes] Subscribe to T3 on iTunes
[RSS] Subscribe to the T3 RSS feed
[MP3] Download the MP3





10. Earthbound
9. Aladdin
8. Super Mario Kart
7. Super Mario World 2: Yoshi&#039;s Island
6. The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past
5. Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles IV: Turtles in Time
4. Super Metroid
3. Mega Man X
2. Donkey Kong County
1. Super Mario World</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Mildly Pleased</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>1:18:43</itunes:duration>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>T3 07: Top 10 One-Hit Wonders of the 1990s</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5065</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5065#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 15:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry for the delay, some technical difficulties arose, had to export it overnight. Enjoy! There are two kinds of people: those that hate 1990s music and those that love it. Everyone at T3 falls in the latter. As younglings, the music of Weird Al and The La&#8217;s seemed wonderful and exciting to the guys. Now that they&#8217;re [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/t31.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><p><em>Sorry for the delay, some technical difficulties arose, had to export it overnight. Enjoy!</em></p>
<p>There are two kinds of people: those that hate 1990s music and those that love it. Everyone at T3 falls in the latter. As younglings, the music of Weird Al and The La&#8217;s seemed wonderful and exciting to the guys. Now that they&#8217;re all older and vastly more cynical, they return to wring what little nostalgia is left out of the tunes that they still remember. By discovering together their favorite Nineties One-Hit Wonders, they find what they had really been looking for all along: each other.</p>
<p>If all that sounds like a bit much to you, you could always just look at the list after the break.</p>
<p><strong>Top Ways to Listen:</strong><br />
[<a href="http://www.itunes.com/podcast?id=501634977">iTunes</a>] Subscribe to T3 on iTunes<br />
[<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/toptenthursdays">RSS</a>] Subscribe to the T3 RSS feed<br />
[<a href="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Podcast_3-1-12.mp3">MP3</a>] Download the MP3</p>

<p><span id="more-5065"></span></p>
<p>10. House of Pain &#8211; &#8220;Jump Around&#8221;<br />
9. Blind Melon &#8211; &#8220;No Rain&#8221;<br />
8. Spacehog &#8211; &#8220;In the Meantime&#8221;<br />
7. Chumbawumba &#8211; &#8220;Tubthumping&#8221;<br />
6. OMC &#8211; &#8220;How Bizarre&#8221;<br />
5. Harvey Danger &#8211; &#8220;Flagpole Sitta&#8221;<br />
4. The Proclaimers &#8211; &#8220;I&#8217;m Gonna Be (500 Miles)&#8221;<br />
3. The Mighty Mighty Bosstones &#8211; &#8220;The Impression That I Get&#8221;<br />
2. Semisonic &#8211; &#8220;Closing Time&#8221;<br />
1. The Verve &#8211; &#8220;Bittersweet Symphony&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=5065</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Podcast_3-1-12.mp3" length="41281747" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>t3</itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:subtitle>Sorry for the delay, some technical difficulties arose, had to export it overnight. Enjoy! - There are two kinds of people: those that hate 1990s music and those that love it. Everyone at T3 falls in the latter. As younglings,</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Sorry for the delay, some technical difficulties arose, had to export it overnight. Enjoy!

There are two kinds of people: those that hate 1990s music and those that love it. Everyone at T3 falls in the latter. As younglings, the music of Weird Al and The La&#039;s seemed wonderful and exciting to the guys. Now that they&#039;re all older and vastly more cynical, they return to wring what little nostalgia is left out of the tunes that they still remember. By discovering together their favorite Nineties One-Hit Wonders, they find what they had really been looking for all along: each other.

If all that sounds like a bit much to you, you could always just look at the list after the break.

Top Ways to Listen:
[iTunes] Subscribe to T3 on iTunes
[RSS] Subscribe to the T3 RSS feed
[MP3] Download the MP3





10. House of Pain - &quot;Jump Around&quot;
9. Blind Melon - &quot;No Rain&quot;
8. Spacehog - &quot;In the Meantime&quot;
7. Chumbawumba - &quot;Tubthumping&quot;
6. OMC - &quot;How Bizarre&quot;
5. Harvey Danger - &quot;Flagpole Sitta&quot;
4. The Proclaimers - &quot;I&#039;m Gonna Be (500 Miles)&quot;
3. The Mighty Mighty Bosstones - &quot;The Impression That I Get&quot;
2. Semisonic - &quot;Closing Time&quot;
1. The Verve - &quot;Bittersweet Symphony&quot;</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Mildly Pleased</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>1:26:00</itunes:duration>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Old Dog, Newish Tricks</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5059</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5059#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 07:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dr. Dog &#8211; Be the Void Here&#8217;s an album I didn&#8217;t think I&#8217;d be the one reviewing. Dr. Dog is a band I&#8217;ve always liked, but more on an individual song basis than entire albums. For example, &#8220;My Old Ways&#8221; is a tune I love to listen to, but right now I probably couldn&#8217;t tell [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/dr_dog_be_the_void-e1330565237224.jpeg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Dr. Dog &#8211; <em>Be the Void</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Here&#8217;s an album I didn&#8217;t think I&#8217;d be the one reviewing. Dr. Dog is a band I&#8217;ve always liked, but more on an individual song basis than entire albums. For example, &#8220;My Old Ways&#8221; is a tune I love to listen to, but right now I probably couldn&#8217;t tell you what any other song off <em>We All Belong</em> sounds like. Nonetheless, the latest release from these titans of lofi has been out for a few weeks now and if I didn&#8217;t write about it, I fear time might forget about it.</p>
<p>The big question about a new album from Dr. Dog is how they&#8217;ve improved production values. I can&#8217;t say they&#8217;ve improved over <em>Shame, Shame</em>. Rather, they&#8217;ve gone it bit backwards. While Dr. Dog&#8217;s last album was beautiful, this time they went for the fuzzy, classic rock feel of their early, self-recorded material. Everything&#8217;s fairly anthemic, energetic and exciting to listen to &#8211; I&#8217;d say this album has as many catchy tracks as any other of their albums.</p>
<p>After 2011 saw many of my favorite bands release disappointing new albums, it&#8217;s really pleasing to hear Dr. Dog, after five albums, is as good as ever. And if you can listen to &#8220;How Long Must I Wait&#8221; and not find it stuck in your head later, you&#8217;re not human.</p>
<p><strong>Favorite Tracks:</strong> &#8220;Lonesome,&#8221; &#8220;How Long Must I Wait,&#8221; &#8220;Get Away&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=5059</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Silent Victory!</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5052</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5052#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 07:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5052</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seems like I usually write some kind of afterthought about Oscar night, so here we go again. Oscar vet Billy Crystal was back at the helm and even though he was a little cheesy with no shortage on movie puns, it was still a nice change of pace from last year. Anne Hathaway and James [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Oscars2012_colorlogo300-web.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><p>Seems like I usually write some kind of afterthought about Oscar night, so here we go again. Oscar vet Billy Crystal was back at the helm and even though he was a little cheesy with no shortage on movie puns, it was still a nice change of pace from last year. Anne Hathaway and James Franco? What were they thinking? Billy wasn&#8217;t really funny but at least he seems to be comfortable doing something he clearly enjoys. So hopefully the Academy will stop experimenting with strange non-comedian hosts and just let the funny people do what they do best.</p>
<p>The ceremony opened with movie montage (as it often does) featuring Crystal which was probably his best moment, but I still the rest of his old school approach to the classiest night in showbiz. As for who brought home the gold? I was very satisfied. Most of my personal favorites won in their respective categories, the exception being Viola Davis losing to Meryl Streep. I didn&#8217;t see <i>The Iron Lady</I> so I don&#8217;t know if Streep was truly deserving or if it was just the Academy throwing her bone after, but it doesn&#8217;t bother me, I&#8217;m sure she&#8217;s usually pretty darn good. But <i>The Artist</I> was the big winner of the night and I couldn&#8217;t be happier. When Natalie Portman or &#8220;NaPo&#8221; as Sean calls her called Jean Dujardin&#8217;s name in the best actor category? I was ecstatic, it was easily my favorite performance of the year. Really this is one of the first years in awhile where I really have no complaints. <i>The Artist</I> won, Bret Mckenzie won for his song in <i>The Muppets</I>, and now Dean Pelton from <i>Community</I> has an oscar fro screenwriting, let the good times roll. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=5052</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sour Power</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5045</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5045#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 07:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Band of Skulls &#8211; Sweet Sour I&#8217;m not sure when or where I first heard about Band of Skulls but it&#8217;s hard to forget a name like &#8220;Band of Skulls.&#8221; With a name that sounds perfectly suited for a Norwegian death metal band, you might be surprised to find that Band of SKulls is actually [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/bandofskulls_sweetsour.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Band of Skulls &#8211; <em>Sweet Sour</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure when or where I first heard about <em>Band of Skulls</em> but it&#8217;s hard to forget a name like &#8220;Band of Skulls.&#8221; With a name that sounds perfectly suited for a Norwegian death metal band, you might be surprised to find that <i>Band of SKulls</I> is actually a hard rock trio from Southampton. <em>Sweet Sour</em> is the group&#8217;s second release and though I&#8217;ll say it definitely has it&#8217;s moments that&#8217;s really all it is, moments. So if you&#8217;re looking for the latest and greatest in hard rock you probably wont find it here, but that doesn&#8217;t mean you wont enjoy parts of <em>Sweet Sour</em></p>
<p>The leadoff track, which also happens to be the title track, should be able to give any rock junkie a fix with it&#8217;s droning beat and buzzing hammer-ons. Vocal duties on the track and most tracks are split between guitarist Matt Hayward and bassist Emma Richardson. Utizling the male/female hard rock dynamic, it&#8217;s hard not to think of Alison Mosshart and Jack White from <em>The Dead Weather</em>, but I think Richardson and Hayward&#8217;s vocals tend to blend better and in a very beautiful way. Drummer Russell Marsden provides some perfectly John Bonham-esque beats and ultimately the trio creates a very full sound. I was actually really digging this album on about the first three tracks, but after that my mind started to wander.</p>
<p>Somewhere in the middle of this album I found myself zoning out, and not because I was getting lost in the groove of a song. Constantly I found myself checking how much of the song was left in iTunes and that certainly can&#8217;t be good. Like I said earlier in my review there are a lot of great &#8220;moments&#8221; on <em>Sweet Sour</em> but as a whole it can be boring. I think what did it for me was being worn out by the track runtimes. This is a band that should learn to utilize tracks around the 2:50-3:00 range, as they&#8217;re really not doing enough to warrant 5:00 plus minutes. If these songs had a lot of varied sections or some improvisation I&#8217;d be content, but these songs just seem to keep going and going. I almost contemplated giving this album a slightly lower rating but I just love some of the things they&#8217;re doing so much that I&#8217;ll let them settle in with the typical mildly pleased rating.</p>
<p><strong>Favorite Tracks:</strong> &#8220;Bruises&#8221;, &#8220;Lay My Head Down&#8221;, &#8220;Sweet Sour&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=5045</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Choose You!</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5037</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5037#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 07:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ah the Oscars, my favorite TV event of the whole year. So many have criticized this prestigious ceremony over the years for many different reasons. Some say it focuses more on the best marketed movies than the actual best movies, and there could be some truth to that. Though for the most part I believe [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/oscar_wide.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><p>Ah the Oscars, my favorite TV event of the whole year. So many have criticized this prestigious ceremony over the years for many different reasons. Some say it focuses more on the best marketed movies than the actual best movies, and there could be some truth to that. Though for the most part I believe the Academy makes the right decisions regarding who they nominate and who they award.  I just love the Oscars because it celebrates the movies and hey, sometimes it&#8217;s even funny… Though certainly not last year. Luckily the host with most Billy Crystal is back at the helm and the field of nominees is pretty solid. Though you probably wont see much variance in my list from most critic&#8217;s lists as there always seems to be that strange point where everyone agrees on the same things. So who knows, maybe I&#8217;ll be way off with some of these, I like surprises. </p>
<p><span id="more-5037"></span></p>
<p><b>Best Adapted Screenplay</b><br />
My personal favorite of this year&#8217;s crowd would be <i>Moneyball</I> for it&#8217;s ability to bring a book I wouldn&#8217;t expect to as a movie to the big screen. Though I think there&#8217;s a good chance it will go to <i>The Descendants</i>. Alexander Payne has a knack for finding the humor of &#8220;Painful&#8221; real life situations and I think that will be recognized. Actors Jim Rash and Nat Faxon co-authored and the screenplay and to think of a world where Dean Pelton from <i>Community</I> and some guy from <i>Beerfest</I> could have oscars fills me with hope for this world, go team <i>The Descendants</I>!</p>
<p><b>Best Original Screenplay</b><br />
Of course my favorite for every category is going to be <i>The Artist</I> but everyone says Woody Allen for <i>Midnight in Paris</I>, so I&#8217;ll go with the safe bet. I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised by an upset for the Woodman here (like he would care) as this usually seems to be an unpredictable category. <i>Bridesmaids</I> is the dark horse but even that has an outside chance. It also makes me interested to see <i>A Separation</I> nominated. When I see a foreign movie with that many nominations it always makes me wonder… Is the only thing holding that film back from winning the fact that it&#8217;s foreign? Is it one of the best films of the year? Unfortunately it&#8217;s foreign so I didn&#8217;t get to see it. Where was I? Oh yeah, <i>Midnight in Paris</I> but I don&#8217;t know, Woody is always a no show at the Academy Awards. How will that affect the film&#8217;s chances? This one could be interesting </p>
<p><b>Best Supporting Actress</b><br />
I like to think Octavia Spencer is a lock but that&#8217;s also because she&#8217;s my favorite in this category. The strange case here is why Shailene Woodley wasn&#8217;t nominated for <i>The Descendants</I>. Granted I didn&#8217;t see Janet McTeer in <I>Albert Nobbs</I> I think Shailene Woodley easily gave the second best supporting actress performance of the year. Anyways, the fact that Octavia Spencer could now have an oscar is why I watch the Oscars. Here is an actress that I previously knew for roles like the prostitute in <i>Bad Santa</I> and as a bank employee in <i>Drag Me to Hell</I> and now she could have an oscar? Nothing better than seeing a talented actress get a break in the biggest awards ceremony of the year. </p>
<p><b>Best Supporting Actor</b><br />
If there&#8217;s one nominee that&#8217;s been a lock since day one of award&#8217;s season it&#8217;s Christopher Plummer. I feel like I can say that with confidence because, 1. Plummer is completely deserving of the award and has consistently been winning in this category and 2. Once again the biggest competition in this category, in this case Albert Brooks, wasn&#8217;t even nominated. I didn&#8217;t see Kenneth Branagh in <i>My Week with Marilyn</I> but I did see all the other performances for this category and I can tell ya, no one is taking this night away from Christopher Plummer. </p>
<p><b>Best Actress</b><br />
Meryl Streep keeps coming up again and again so this is a tough one. I didn&#8217;t really have any interest in seeing <i>The Iron Lady</I> and the bad reviews didn&#8217;t help. Streep of course took home the Golden Globe so I wonder how the film&#8217;s bad reviews will weigh into the situation. Of course it shouldn&#8217;t matter when were only talking about the performance, I feel like the Academy usually tries to focus on the better reviewed movies when it comes to bringing home the gold. So I&#8217;m just going to go ahead and go with my favorite performance in Viola Davis for <i>The Help</I>. Davis is completely deserving but she apparently has some stiff competition, this is one of the categories where I&#8217;m really not sure. </p>
<p><b>Best Actor</b><br />
Now here is where I&#8217;m most unsure. <i>The Artist</I> has been this year&#8217;s darling on the award show circuit but Clooney&#8217;s name has consistently come up. It doesn&#8217;t help that most ceremonies split the best actor award into both a dramatic and comedic category. I like Clooney but I really don&#8217;t see the need to give him a second oscar for what&#8217;s essentially a very typical Clooney performance. Don&#8217;t get me wrong, he&#8217;s good but he&#8217;s not really stepping out of his boundaries for this one. Dujardin on the other hand gave a a delightfully expressive performance in <i>The Artist</I>, but the fact that it&#8217;s silent? That could be a tough obstacle to get around. Nonetheless I&#8217;m pulling for Dujardin and he&#8217;s ultimately my pick. </p>
<p><b>Best Director</b><br />
One of the few categories where I think everyone is equally deserving of the award. Woody Allen, Alexander Payne, Terrence Malick, Martin Scorsese, what a lineup… And then you have Michel Hazanvicius. A name I&#8217;m sure no one had heard of before <i>The Artist</I>. Though I&#8217;m not sure he actually deserves it what it really it comes down to is &#8220;How much does the Academy love <i>The Artist</I>?&#8221; Being nominated for ten oscars sure is something, so will it be the big winner or not? Hard to say but I&#8217;m putting my money on Hazanavicius. </p>
<p><b>Best Picture</b><br />
It&#8217;s got to be <i>The Artist</i>, if there&#8217;s even one category it deserves to win it&#8217;s this one and how cool would that be? The idea of a  silent film winning best picture in this day and age? Oh how much joy that would fill me with. It&#8217;s pretty brave to make a film like <i>The Artist</I>  in this day and age and not only that but the fact that it succeeded on such a triumphant level. I wouldn&#8217;t care if I was wrong in every category as long as this took home the gold. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=5037</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;I&#8217;d Love to Lick a Lemon Lollipop in Lillehammer&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5020</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5020#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5020</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lilyhammer Looks like we&#8217;ve entered a new age as movie delivery/streaming service Netflix has delivered it&#8217;s first original series in Lilyhammer. The series stars who else but renowned E-Street Band guitarist/Sopranos actor Steven Van Zandt as the endlessly entertaining wise guy Frankie &#8220;The Fixer&#8221; Tagliano. After the death of a former Mafia associate, Frankie Tagliano [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/310737640-06081713.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><em>Lilyhammer</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Looks like we&#8217;ve entered a new age as movie delivery/streaming service Netflix has delivered it&#8217;s first original series in <em>Lilyhammer</em>. The series stars who else but renowned <em>E-Street Band</em> guitarist/<em>Sopranos</em> actor Steven Van Zandt as the endlessly entertaining wise guy Frankie &#8220;The Fixer&#8221; Tagliano. After the death of a former Mafia associate, Frankie Tagliano enters the witness relocation program and testifies against his organization so that he can start over with a clean slate… And what better place to start over then in the humble city of Lillehammer, Norway?</p>
<p>Infatuated with the city ever since he watched the 1994 Olympics, Frankie imagines a life with crisp snow, fresh mountain air, and beautiful Scandinavian broads, unfortunately this isn&#8217;t the case. Under the new name of Giovanni &#8220;Johnny&#8221; Henriksen, Frankie finds himself in a freezing and relatively uneventful community where he now must attend immigration classes, job meetings, and other mundane activities. So surely enough Frankie, or should I say Johnny (as that&#8217;s what everyone calls him) returns to his old habits of blackmail, extortion, and violence, to open his own bar and start his own crime underworld in the sleepy suburbs of Lillehammer.</p>
<p>Along the way Johnny meets plenty of colorful characters including Torgeir (Trond Fausas Aurvag) a a dimwitted local who quickly becomes Johnny&#8217;s right hand man, Jan (Fridtjov Saheim) an adulterous Labor office employee, and Sigrid (Marian Saastad Ottesen) a kindhearted single mother whom Johnny forms a relationship with. The results are a full on black comedy that pokes fun both at the pompous attitudes of Americans and the docile, folksy lives of small town Scandinavians. It&#8217;s certainly quirky and if you have been intrigued by anything I&#8217;ve said thus far then you will probably like this show.</p>
<p>I was a little hesitant about Steven Van Zandt starring in a series as his role in <em>The Sopranos</em> always seemed minimal, but he&#8217;s hilarious. Sure the character is essentially the typical wise guy character, but Van Zandt takes it so over-the-top it&#8217;s hard not to laugh. Even Van Zandt&#8217;s physical performance, hunched over with a constant scowl is a joy to watch, he clearly enjoys playing this character and I enjoy watching him. Though what really makes the character work is the fact that he&#8217;s set in such a unique surrounding. Here we have this tough as nails guy from the Big Apple now in a town with these almost annoyingly helpful Norwegians, it&#8217;s the classic fish out of water story.</p>
<p>Aside from Van Zant, the show is cleverly written and finds a good balance between humor and drama. I&#8217;d still say the show is a comedy but it definitely has it&#8217;s darker moments, you simply couldn&#8217;t have a crime show without violence. My only complaint is that this show may be too over-the-top. It is a little hard to believe any of this could happen and Johnny is more or less an Italian stereotype with little depth. That aside this show is very funny with some well executed twists and turns to keep you interested. If you have Netflix streaming than I recommend you check it out and hopefully when Van Zandt is done touring with &#8220;The Boss&#8221; he&#8217;ll get back to work on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=5020</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wake Me Up Before You Go-Go</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5013</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5013#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 23:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Awake Awake is NBC&#8217;s latest cop drama series from Kyle Killen. From the creator of the ill-fated but well received FOX drama Lonestar, Killen&#8217;s latest show premieres on March 1st but the pilot is currently available to watch for free on Hulu. I don&#8217;t normally watch basic cable dramas but something about the premise to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Awake-awake-nbc-24364390-1920-1080.png" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><em>Awake</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><em>Awake</em> is NBC&#8217;s latest cop drama series from Kyle Killen. From the creator of the ill-fated but well received FOX drama <em>Lonestar</em>, Killen&#8217;s latest show premieres on March 1st but the pilot is currently available to watch for free on Hulu. I don&#8217;t normally watch basic cable dramas but something about the premise to <em>Awake</em> really intrigued me. <em>Awake</em> stars Jason Isaacs (AKA Lucius Malfoy) as American police detective Michael Britten suffering from the effects of a recent traumatic car accident. Traumatic in what way? After the accident Michael finds himself living two different lives. In one life Michael&#8217;s son is dead from the accident while in the other his wife is dead. Michael switches between the two different lives every time he goes to bed and wakes up the next day. Michael also has different therapists for each life, Cherry Jones plays one and BD Wong the other, as well as new partner (Wilmer Valderrama) in one life while in the other he works solo. To help separate the two lives Michael wears a red wrist band (for the world with his wife) and a green wrist band (for the one with his son). Michael has different cases in each life but as seen in the pilot there are occasional details that overlap, possibly reveling potential clues between what&#8217;s real and what&#8217;s a dream.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s a fantastic premise but I&#8217;m going to go right ahead and say this pilot didn&#8217;t do much for me. Something about the execution seems very procedural of any typical cop drama. Michael struggles with his case, blah, blah, shares some melodramatic scenes with his wife yadda, yadda. The setup maybe new but nothing else about this show is or really stands out. Though I will say that I saw the seedlings of ideas that could have the potential to grow into something very interesting. What I did enjoy here is when Michael discovered clues between his two different cases and how they connected between his lives. This whole concept of how these lives are related could equal great television if handled well, but I have the sneaking suspicion they wont be. Where most people will be watching this show to know what it all means, you know the show runners will want to prolong that for as long as possible. What that means is that this show will most likely drag on in the same way that <em>How I Met Your Mother</em> does in revealing who the mother is.</p>
<p>Honestly I think <em>Awake</em> would of been a much better idea for a movie. I would imagine it like <em>Memento</em> if it was about Cops. The problem here is they&#8217;ve given the audience a great question with no intention to answer it anytime soon. Though this is by no means a terrible show and could have the potential to become better as the mystery develops. One thing I almost forgot to mention was the excellent lead performance by Jason Isaacs, I had no idea he could so convincingly play a hardened American detective. Will I watch the next episode of <em>Awake</em>? Possibly, but it if it&#8217;s more of the same I&#8217;m out, out cold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=5013</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>T3 06: Top 10 TV Show Title Sequences</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4998</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4998#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 08:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4998</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Finally leaving the domain of movies for a change, the guys take on perhaps their most heated topic yet: TV show title sequences. Yes, those memorable segments at the beginning of shows that you probably forgot about ever since you got your DVR. It&#8217;s a battle of visuals and music; the catchy versus the memorable, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/t31.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><p>Finally leaving the domain of movies for a change, the guys take on perhaps their most heated topic yet: TV show title sequences. Yes, those memorable segments at the beginning of shows that you probably forgot about ever since you got your DVR. It&#8217;s a battle of visuals and music; the catchy versus the memorable, the time-tested classics versus modern marvels. A topic so deep and with some many options, there&#8217;s quite a high probability one of your favorites won&#8217;t even get an honorable mention. Strap in baby, it&#8217;s time to get your T3 on.</p>
<p>Or you could just skip the whole show and read our final list. I wouldn&#8217;t do it, but we&#8217;re all for free will here.</p>
<p><strong>Top Ways to Listen:</strong><br />
[<a href="http://www.itunes.com/podcast?id=501634977">iTunes</a>] Subscribe to T3 on iTunes<br />
[<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/toptenthursdays">RSS</a>] Subscribe to the T3 RSS feed<br />
[<a href="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Podcast_2-23-12.mp3">MP3</a>] Download the MP3</p>

<p><span id="more-4998"></span></p>
<p>10. <em>The Mary Tyler Moore Show</em><br />
9. <em>Miami Vice</em><br />
8. <em>All in the Family</em><br />
7. <em>The Drew Carey Show</em><br />
6. <em>The Sopranos</em><br />
5. <em>The Simpsons</em><br />
4. <em>The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air</em><br />
3. <em>Mad Men</em><br />
2. <em>Batman: The Animated Series</em><br />
1. <em>Cheers</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4998</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Podcast_2-23-12.mp3" length="36483575" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>t3</itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:subtitle>Finally leaving the domain of movies for a change, the guys take on perhaps their most heated topic yet: TV show title sequences. Yes, those memorable segments at the beginning of shows that you probably forgot about ever since you got your DVR.</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Finally leaving the domain of movies for a change, the guys take on perhaps their most heated topic yet: TV show title sequences. Yes, those memorable segments at the beginning of shows that you probably forgot about ever since you got your DVR. It&#039;s a battle of visuals and music; the catchy versus the memorable, the time-tested classics versus modern marvels. A topic so deep and with some many options, there&#039;s quite a high probability one of your favorites won&#039;t even get an honorable mention. Strap in baby, it&#039;s time to get your T3 on.

Or you could just skip the whole show and read our final list. I wouldn&#039;t do it, but we&#039;re all for free will here.

Top Ways to Listen:
[iTunes] Subscribe to T3 on iTunes
[RSS] Subscribe to the T3 RSS feed
[MP3] Download the MP3





10. The Mary Tyler Moore Show
9. Miami Vice
8. All in the Family
7. The Drew Carey Show
6. The Sopranos
5. The Simpsons
4. The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air
3. Mad Men
2. Batman: The Animated Series
1. Cheers</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Mildly Pleased</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>1:16:00</itunes:duration>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>There&#8217;s Gonna Be a Reckoning</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5006</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5006#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 02:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=5006</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning As the first title from Curt Schilling&#8217;s 38 Studios, Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning demands comparison. At first look, Reckoning seems very Fable-like, with its quasi-cartoony art style, whimsical score and ambition to combine quality combat with an RPG world. Knowing that Elder Scrolls veteran Ken Rolston designed the game makes all [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Kingdoms-of-Amalur-Reckoning-new-game-mcfarlane-art-cover-e1329960375251.jpeg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><em>Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>As the first title from Curt Schilling&#8217;s 38 Studios, <em>Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning</em> demands comparison. At first look, <em>Reckoning</em> seems very <em>Fable</em>-like, with its quasi-cartoony art style, whimsical score and ambition to combine quality combat with an RPG world. Knowing that <em>Elder Scrolls</em> veteran Ken Rolston designed the game makes all the elements borrowed from that series more apparent. But really, if there&#8217;s any single game to compare this to, it would be <em>World of Warcraft</em>. Played solo, forever.</p>
<p>The game begins with the player character dead and then quickly not dead, being revived by a thing called the Well of Souls right before it&#8217;s destroyed by evil invaders. This is a world were fate is a very real thing, which everyone accepts and follows. Except for our undead hero, who has become the Fateless One, able to not only determine his or her own destiny, but to change the fates of others. And what does one do with such vast potential? Become the world&#8217;s premier errand boy.</p>
<p><em>Reckoning</em> plays very much like an MMORPG, as fetch quests quickly become the game&#8217;s MO. There is a staggering amount of quests to do in the world of Amalur, but most of them just aren&#8217;t that interesting to do. Like <em>World of Warcraft</em>, taken individually, the tasks you are given just aren&#8217;t that interesting, and I quickly found myself skipping through sidequest dialogue and only completing the jobs that were on my way to the next real mission. The game&#8217;s main story is actually really serious and pretty good, as are the faction quests (ala <em>Elder Scrolls</em>) so I recommend you take this approach as well and not let the glut of sidequests dilute your experience.</p>
<p>Where <em>Reckoning</em> really shines is its combat system, which really plays up the fateless aspect of the story. Since you can choose your own destiny, the game lets you spec your character between warrior, rogue and mage trees, or any combination of the three. I spent most of the game as a warrior mage, beating enemies around with a combination of a giant greatsword and magical Frisbess called chakrams, while also blasting foes with spells. The game has a simple combo system that lets you easily combine all your strengths into devastating chain attacks, and, while it&#8217;s not quite <em>God of War</em> or <em>Devil May Cry</em>, this is a huge step up from even <em>Skyrim</em>.</p>
<p>The sheer quantity of loot in this game is pretty impressive. There are chests everywhere full of reagents, gear and gear to be broken into reagents. Good stuff can be anywhere, I found legendary items in piles of rocks and hollow logs. So you&#8217;ll be spending a lot of <em>Reckoning</em> going through every shiny clump in the area, looking for the next great thing. It doesn&#8217;t help that the game&#8217;s inventory interface is somewhat lacking, at least on consoles. Not a lot of information is presented at once, and it takes a few too many clicks to get anywhere. But honestly, it&#8217;s not really that bad and the game&#8217;s junk feature, which lets you put everything you don&#8217;t want in one place and sell it all with one click, is pretty great.</p>
<p>I got over 40 hours out of <em>Reckoning</em>, and I still have a shocking number of quests left to complete. Knowing that this game is paving the way for an Amalur MMORPG makes me wish that this game was online in someway. I want to show people my cool spec and all the sweet gear I crafted for myself. I want my accomplishments to matter. Without a controllable party or a fun memorable cast of characters, I feel so alone. It&#8217;s not easy being fateless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=5006</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>C.A.T: The Damned</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4989</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4989#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 22:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Damned &#8211; Damned Damned Damned (1977) It can be difficult to find relevant albums week by week, so when I found out this album recently celebrated it&#8217;s 35th anniversary I jumped at the opportunity to review it. The Damned were a London based punk group most prominent in the punk boom of the late [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/damned-damnedfront.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">The Damned &#8211; <em>Damned Damned Damned</em> (1977)</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>It can be difficult to find relevant albums week by week, so when I found out this album recently celebrated it&#8217;s 35th anniversary I jumped at the opportunity to review it. <em>The Damned</em> were a London based punk group most prominent in the punk boom of the late 70s. Led by the charismatic Dave Vanian (like Transylvanian), <em>Damned Damned Damned</em> was everything you could want in a lively and to-the-point punk debut. The songs here are energetic, enthusiastic, and even at times somewhat humorous. I mean what can you expect when a band has members with names like &#8220;Captain Sensible&#8221; and &#8220;Rat Scabies&#8221;. Produced by pop musician/frequent Elvis Costello producer Nick Lowe and released in that golden year of 1977, <em>Damned Damned Damned</em> is a must listen for any old school punk fan.</p>
<p>What separates <em>The Damned</em> from other punk groups of the time? That&#8217;s a good question and I&#8217;m not sure I know the answer. The closest thing they remind me of is <em>The Stooges</em>, if they were goofier and from England. They even cover <em>The Stooges&#8217;</em> song &#8220;1970&#8243; under it&#8217;s original name &#8220;I Feel Alright&#8221;. Of course Dave Vanian is no Iggy Pop but he certainly has his own appeal. Vanian was well known for donning gothic vampire-like garb on stage that somehow only enhanced his crooner-like singing style. Alongside Bassist (later guitarist) Captain Sensible, known for his trademark red beret, <em>The Damned</em> were quite a spectacle on stage and still are as they continue to play live.</p>
<p>If you really want to label <em>The Damned</em> I suppose you could call them one of the originators of &#8220;Gothic Punk&#8221; if you want to get that specific with genres. Personally I just enjoy the songs and the energy behind them. Guitarist Brian James wrote the bulk of the material on the album and brings an edge by incorporating more traditional rock riffs but played at quick punk tempos. &#8220;Neat Neat Neat&#8221; and &#8220;New Rose&#8221; are both punk classics in their own right and pretty much speak for themselves. There&#8217;s also a video on YouTube of <em>The Damned</em> playing on <em>The Craig Ferguson Show</em> of all places from 2008 and I&#8217;m glad to say they sound just as good if not better then they ever have. How do these guys still do it? I don&#8217;t know, maybe they sold their souls.</p>
<p><strong>Favorite Tracks:</strong> &#8220;Fan Club&#8221;, &#8220;Neat Neat Neat&#8221;, &#8220;New Rose&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4989</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>T3 05: Top 10 Romantic Comedies</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4986</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4986#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 21:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4986</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[22 movies enter but only 10 leave in this epic battle of true romance! Our unusually epic Valentine&#8217;s week continues with a podcast that&#8217;s just simply full of love. Sean, John and Colin get together and talk about a genre of film that couldn&#8217;t be closer to their hearts: the romantic comedy. And while I&#8217;d [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/t31.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><p>22 movies enter but only 10 leave in this epic battle of true romance! Our unusually epic Valentine&#8217;s week continues with a podcast that&#8217;s just simply full of love. Sean, John and Colin get together and talk about a genre of film that couldn&#8217;t be closer to their hearts: the romantic comedy. And while I&#8217;d like to say that a conversation this dear diffuses the usual arguing, that&#8217;s certainly not the case as they put together this hotly-contested list. In fact, the only real sure thing this time is that Sean still hasn&#8217;t seen enough movies.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve got to get back to your significant other, you can just look at the final list after the break.</p>
<p><strong>Top Ways to Listen:</strong><br />
[<a href="http://www.itunes.com/podcast?id=501634977">iTunes</a>] Subscribe to T3 on iTunes<br />
[<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/toptenthursdays">RSS</a>] Subscribe to the T3 RSS feed<br />
[<a href="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/2012-02-16.mp3">MP3</a>] Download the MP3</p>

<p><span id="more-4986"></span></p>
<p>10. <em>Harold and Maude</em><br />
9. <em>Bringing Up Baby</em><br />
8. <em>Breakfast at Tiffany&#8217;s</em><br />
7. <em>The 40-Year-Old Virigin</em><br />
6. <em>High Fidelity</em><br />
5. <em>Groundhog Day</em><br />
4. <em>The Apartment</em><br />
3. <em>City Lights</em><br />
2. <em>It Happened One Night</em><br />
1. <em>Annie Hall</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4986</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/2012-02-16.mp3" length="34436620" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>t3</itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:subtitle>22 movies enter but only 10 leave in this epic battle of true romance! Our unusually epic Valentine&#039;s week continues with a podcast that&#039;s just simply full of love. Sean, John and Colin get together and talk about a genre of film that couldn&#039;t be close...</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>22 movies enter but only 10 leave in this epic battle of true romance! Our unusually epic Valentine&#039;s week continues with a podcast that&#039;s just simply full of love. Sean, John and Colin get together and talk about a genre of film that couldn&#039;t be closer to their hearts: the romantic comedy. And while I&#039;d like to say that a conversation this dear diffuses the usual arguing, that&#039;s certainly not the case as they put together this hotly-contested list. In fact, the only real sure thing this time is that Sean still hasn&#039;t seen enough movies.

If you&#039;ve got to get back to your significant other, you can just look at the final list after the break.

Top Ways to Listen:
[iTunes] Subscribe to T3 on iTunes
[RSS] Subscribe to the T3 RSS feed
[MP3] Download the MP3





10. Harold and Maude
9. Bringing Up Baby
8. Breakfast at Tiffany&#039;s
7. The 40-Year-Old Virigin
6. High Fidelity
5. Groundhog Day
4. The Apartment
3. City Lights
2. It Happened One Night
1. Annie Hall</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Mildly Pleased</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>1:11:44</itunes:duration>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>C.A.T.: Guitar Romantic</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4971</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4971#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Exploding Hearts &#8211; Guitar Romantic (2003) For a while I&#8217;ve been wanting to revive Classic Album Tuesdays just because, well I haven&#8217;t posted anything in literally weeks.  I&#8217;m ready to give up on the year-by-year thing we were doing, and since it&#8217;s Valentine&#8217;s Day I figured I should pick something &#8220;romantic&#8221; (heh heh).  I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/guitarromantic1.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">The Exploding Hearts &#8211; <em>Guitar Romantic</em> (2003)</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>For a while I&#8217;ve been wanting to revive Classic Album Tuesdays just because, well I haven&#8217;t posted anything in literally weeks.  I&#8217;m ready to give up on the year-by-year thing we were doing, and since it&#8217;s Valentine&#8217;s Day I figured I should pick something &#8220;romantic&#8221; (heh heh).  I really couldn&#8217;t think of anything better-suited than this buoyant collection of love songs with a &#8217;70s punk-inspired edge from a Northwest band that seemed to be bursting with potential.</p>
<p>The Exploding Hearts more or less embodied what it should have sounded like when punk rock and pop melodies got in bed with each other, instead of the pop-punk that glutted the early-00&#8242;s.  It&#8217;s kind of amazing the way these guys walk such an endearing line between doughy-eyed power pop and the kind of rough-and-tumble scruffiness that marked the first wave of punk rock.  In fact, you could easily make comparisons between The Exploding Hearts and bands like The Ramones and The Buzzcocks, as they certainly owe a lot to those retro sounds.   However, I think this album holds up as more than just a piece of punk nostalgia, because I honestly think these songs are just as good as most of the music that came out of that first punk rock explosion of the late 70&#8242;s.</p>
<p>Of course the sad thing about The Exploding Hearts is that this is the only album the band would release, as a few months after it was released, the band was involved in a tragic car accident that claimed the lives of three of the band&#8217;s four members.  None of that sorrow seems to overshadow the music however, as <em>Guitar Romantic</em> stands as one of the more joyous rock albums I&#8217;ve ever heard.  Maybe it&#8217;s a bit soon to be heralding <em>Guitar Romantic</em> as a &#8220;classic&#8221; since it&#8217;s still undeservedly obscure, but if you&#8217;re looking for a great pick-me-up on this most pointless of holidays, I&#8217;d look no further.</p>
<p><strong>Favorite Tracks:</strong> &#8221;I&#8217;m A Pretender&#8221;, &#8220;Sleeping Aides &amp; Razorblades&#8221;, &#8220;Rumours In Town&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4971</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who is Betty Wang?</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4958</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4958#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 21:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hospitality &#8211; Hospitality The music industry has come a long way. Since Napster revolutionized the digital distribution of music, we&#8217;ve seen a paradigm shift not just in the way music is sold, but the way we listen to it. It seems were passed the days of wanton lawsuits against unwitting criminals, and it seems that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/hospitality.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Hospitality &#8211; <em>Hospitality</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>The music industry has come a long way. Since Napster revolutionized the digital distribution of music, we&#8217;ve seen a paradigm shift not just in the way music is sold, but the way we listen to it. It seems were passed the days of wanton lawsuits against unwitting criminals, and it seems that now even the idea of the LP is beginning to wear away against the tide of singles, playlists and EPs. Take Hospitality as an example. With them, we have a group that put out an acclaimed EP in 2008 by themselves. Now, almost four years later, they&#8217;ve signed with a label and put new versions of those songs and a few new ones as their first LP. I never got to hear that EP, or even look at its tracklist, but if you had, wouldn&#8217;t you find it a little annoying that this band got caught up in the old ways and has made so little progress over all this time?</p>
<p>Honestly, this is neither here nor there, as the reality is this album is the first time I heard of Hospitality. And what I heard, I liked. This is that catchy, indie pop kind of music that I tend to gravitate toward, so I&#8217;m not going to have to much to say. The lead singer/songwriter Amber Papini has a voice that reminds me of Karen O or Tracyanne Campbell, but all the critics tell me she sounds weird, so I guess be aware of that? I don&#8217;t all the reviews I&#8217;ve read are pretty positive, that&#8217;s why I listened to this in the first place. I think that Tracyanne Campbell comparison is fair, because Hospitality does remind me Camera Obscura a little bit, kind like if those guys got mixed with Vampire Weekend.</p>
<p>Anyway, it&#8217;s still pretty early in the year and while there aren&#8217;t really that many exciting movies or video games out yet, there&#8217;s actually been a few pretty solid albums that have come out. That&#8217;s another cool thing about music, it seems the barrier for entry is lower than a lot of other media. Dozens of great albums come out every month and actually get covered by enthusiast press. You can&#8217;t really say that about movies and video games. While I really like this album, what I&#8217;m really excited about is the future of Internet distribution.</p>
<p><strong>Favorite Tracks:</strong> &#8220;Friends of Friends,&#8221; &#8220;Betty Wang,&#8221; &#8220;All Day Today&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4958</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>T3 04: Top 10 Disappointing Aspects of The Phantom Menace</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4942</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4942#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In honor of the 3D re-release of Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace, we take a look at what exactly made this movie such a disappointment. Can you remember a world before this came out? When the biggest problem with the Star Wars franchise was ewoks? We had no idea how good we had [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/t31.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><p>In honor of the 3D re-release of <em>Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace</em>, we take a look at what exactly made this movie such a disappointment. Can you remember a world before this came out? When the biggest problem with the <em>Star Wars</em> franchise was ewoks? We had no idea how good we had it. Plenty of nerd rage has built up in the past decade and we let it all out in this special episode. It&#8217;s worth noting that the <a href="http://youtu.be/FxKtZmQgxrI">Red Letter Media Episode I review</a> is mentioned a few times and is certainly a worthwhile viewing if you&#8217;re interested in a funny, well-argued case against that movie.</p>
<p><strong>Top Ways to Listen:</strong><br />
[<a href="http://www.itunes.com/podcast?id=501634977">iTunes</a>] Subscribe to T3 on iTunes<br />
[<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/toptenthursdays">RSS</a>] Subscribe to the T3 RSS feed<br />
[<a href="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Podcast_2-8-12.mp3">MP3</a>] Download the MP3</p>

<p><span id="more-4942"></span></p>
<p>10. C3PO was built by Darth Vader<br />
9. The Trade Federation<br />
8. Nute Gunray<br />
7. The Virgin Birth<br />
6. Too Much Politics<br />
5. Boring Humans<br />
4. Midichlorians<br />
3. Jar Jar Binks<br />
2. All the dialogue<br />
1. Anakin Skywalker being a whiny lil&#8217; bitch</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4942</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Podcast_2-8-12.mp3" length="36784506" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>t3</itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:subtitle>In honor of the 3D re-release of Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace, we take a look at what exactly made this movie such a disappointment. Can you remember a world before this came out? When the biggest problem with the Star Wars franchise was ewo...</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>In honor of the 3D re-release of Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace, we take a look at what exactly made this movie such a disappointment. Can you remember a world before this came out? When the biggest problem with the Star Wars franchise was ewoks? We had no idea how good we had it. Plenty of nerd rage has built up in the past decade and we let it all out in this special episode. It&#039;s worth noting that the Red Letter Media Episode I review is mentioned a few times and is certainly a worthwhile viewing if you&#039;re interested in a funny, well-argued case against that movie.

Top Ways to Listen:
[iTunes] Subscribe to T3 on iTunes
[RSS] Subscribe to the T3 RSS feed
[MP3] Download the MP3





10. C3PO was built by Darth Vader
9. The Trade Federation
8. Nute Gunray
7. The Virgin Birth
6. Too Much Politics
5. Boring Humans
4. Midichlorians
3. Jar Jar Binks
2. All the dialogue
1. Anakin Skywalker being a whiny lil&#039; bitch</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Mildly Pleased</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>1:16:38</itunes:duration>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Baby&#8217;s in Black</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4913</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4913#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 21:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Woman in Black It is not often that a mainstream horror movie is released to even remotely positive reviews so when it does happen I&#8217;m all over it. Aside from that The Woman in Black appealed to me for two reasons: one, it&#8217;s a gothic period piece and two, it was produced by Hammer [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/2012-01-30-womaninblack.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><em>The Woman in Black</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>It is not often that a mainstream horror movie is released to even remotely positive reviews so when it does happen I&#8217;m all over it. Aside from that <em>The Woman in Black</em> appealed to me for two reasons: one, it&#8217;s a gothic period piece and two, it was produced by Hammer Films. To someone unfamiliar with Hammer Films let me provide a little backstory. Hammer Films is a UK production company that was established in the 1930s and rose to fame in the 50s and 60s for their traditional Gothic horror films. Hammer Films were atmospheric, classy, and often surprising violent all in one marvelous package. They recently returned to producing films a few years ago but this is the studio&#8217;s first stab at a Gothic horror film in over thirty years. How does it stack up those original productions? I&#8217;m glad to say this is one of the scariest and most atmospheric horror movies I&#8217;ve seen in awhile.</p>
<p>Arthur Kipps (Daniel Radcliffe) is a young widower father working as a lawyer in early 1900s London. Still haunted by visions of his dead wife, Arthur must also deal with continuing pressure from his employers. So Arthur is sent to the most depressing English village you&#8217;ve ever seen to handle the Eel Marsh estate. Previously owned by the now deceased Alice Drablow, Arthur quickly discovers there&#8217;s something askew about Eel Marsh. Since the death of Drablow the town has had an unusually high child suicide rate and it is believed to be connected to her death. Thus it us up to Arthur to uncover the ghastly secrets of the &#8220;Woman in Black.&#8221;</p>
<p>The role of Arthur Kipps doesn&#8217;t demand much aside from someone who can act frightened and give the occasional &#8220;Who&#8217;s there?&#8221; line, but Radcliffe does a fine job. Though find it odd to see the 22 year old Radcliffe playing the father of a four year old. Not that it would be that unusual for a man that age to have a child (especially during the time period) it&#8217;s just strange to see someone we still primarily see as a child actor playing a parent. Ciaran Hinds plays a wealthy landowner who befriends Arthur and does fine job in the only other other significant role in the film, I&#8217;ver never understood why he doesn&#8217;t receive more prominent roles. Though characters aside this is a movie about the effects and atmosphere.</p>
<p>This film is shot in some of the most eerie locations I&#8217;ve seen in a horror movie. All of the sets are dressed in a gloomy, gothic decor that could only exist in turn of the century England. Eel Marsh itself is like a living, breathing character. It rests on raised forested hill with a lone road that periodically gets swallowed by the tide every day. So whenever Arthur is taken up to Eel Marsh you know he&#8217;s in for a long stay. The Drablow house itself is the classic haunted house filled with cobwebs and many, many creepy dolls. Of course this is where Arthur sees &#8220;The Woman in Black&#8221; figure and though the scares are sometimes cheap they are a lot of fun.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve noticed in the best horror films you always find yourself continually waiting for the next daylight scene, often because that&#8217;s where you get some relief. <em>The Woman in Black</em> like any effective horror movie truly delivers on that constant feeling of tension and dread and it&#8217;s very thrilling. Sure, <em>The Woman in Black</em> lacks originality in many aspects but it takes a traditional horror style and hits every right note. For what it is this is a great scary movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4913</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Battle in Seattle</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4878</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4878#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 21:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chronicle  The first thing I noticed about Chronicle was that great poster. People flying around the Seattle skyline? Sweet. Then I found out it was a shaky cam movie about superpowers and I was even more intrigued. I know a lot of people are getting tired of these &#8220;found footage&#8221; type movies but I still [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Chronicle-2012-Movie-Teaser-Poster-e1328475390525.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><em>Chronicle </em></span><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" alt="" border="0" /></p>
<p>The first thing I noticed about <em>Chronicle</em> was that great poster. People flying around the Seattle skyline? Sweet. Then I found out it was a shaky cam movie about superpowers and I was even more intrigued. I know a lot of people are getting tired of these &#8220;found footage&#8221; type movies but I still enjoy the technique even if it is a gimmick. <em>Paranormal Activity</em>, <em>Cloverfield</em>, <em>The Last Exorcism</em>, I enjoyed these movies because they took the surreal and attempted to portray it in a realistic way. Of course the question always arises &#8220;Why don&#8217;t they put down the camera?&#8221; And I&#8217;d like to say that problem was solved in <em>Chronicle</em> (It wasn&#8217;t) but where it lacks in conceptual plot holes it makes up for in sheer entertainment value.</p>
<p>Andrew (Dane DeHaan) is lonely high schooler who starts to videotape his life on a new camera. Why does he do it? I don&#8217;t know, but if he didn&#8217;t then I guess we wouldn&#8217;t have a movie. Andrew is a shy and reclusive teen with an alcoholic father, a dying mother, and no social life. His only friend is his popular cousin Matt (Alex Russell) who is constantly trying to get Andrew to open up. One night, Matt convinces Andrew to go to a rave at a converted barn. At the party they meet up with Matt&#8217;s friend Steve (MIchael B. Jordan). Together the three stumble upon a secret cave where they discover some kind of meteor and BOOM superpowers.</p>
<p>Though at times I wondered if this movie really needed to be a shaky cam movie I think in retrospect it was the right choice. Something about seeing digital effects on a typical camcorder just makes them that more impressive. The scenes where the characters &#8220;practice&#8221; their powers on unsuspecting bystanders are a real treat to watch and the battle scenes are impressive. A lot of people have criticized the last half of this film for being too action packed but I thought it found a good balance.</p>
<p>Something I like about <em>Chronicle</em> when compared to so many other films about teenagers is that it feels genuine. I could honestly believe these were real kids and this is how they would act and respond to this situation. As a matter of fact, I&#8217;ve noticed this about characters in a lot of shaky cam movies. Something about the &#8220;Home movie&#8221; style in these kinds of movies only brings out the best in their actors.</p>
<p>In my defense of shaky cameras it might seem like a bit of a contradiction to say this movie being shaky cam is both a gift and a curse. It is a gift because of what the technique does for the effects and performances but a curse in that it doesn&#8217;t make any sense. These characters all filming each other all the time? This is a hard obstacle to get past and often sucked me right out of the film entirely. I liked <em>Chronicle</em> it was just a bit of a stretch with the concept… And I can only pray it doesn&#8217;t turn into a franchise which I think it could.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4878</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>T3 03: Top 10 Anticipated Movies of 2012</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4852</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4852#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 06:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This Thursday, the gang came up with a topic so partisan, so biased, that they decided to present their lists independently. That&#8217;s right, it&#8217;s their most anticipated movies of the year. How does one rank anticipation? Who knows. But one thing&#8217;s for sure, the guy&#8217;s definitely did talk about films they want to see. Well, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/t31.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><p>This Thursday, the gang came up with a topic so partisan, so biased, that they decided to present their lists independently. That&#8217;s right, it&#8217;s their most anticipated movies of the year. How does one rank anticipation? Who knows. But one thing&#8217;s for sure, the guy&#8217;s definitely did talk about films they want to see. Well, except for Colin, he talks about the movies he doesn&#8217;t really want to see at all. And Matt, who finally joined in on the, is really just along for the ride. John definitely has a list, though. Sean does too, along with a bunch of failed segues. Damn it if this is not the most compelling podcast of the year!</p>
<p>Press that &#8220;Continue Reading&#8221; button to spoil the show for yourself and find out who we talk about more &#8211; The Rock or Channing Tatum.</p>
<p><strong>Top Ways to Listen:</strong><br />
[<a href="http://www.itunes.com/podcast?id=501634977">iTunes</a>] Subscribe to T3 on iTunes<br />
[<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/toptenthursdays">RSS</a>] Subscribe to the T3 RSS feed<br />
[<a href="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/2012-02-02.mp3">MP3</a>] Download the MP3</p>

<p><span id="more-4852"></span></p>
<p><strong>John:</strong><br />
10. <em>The Avengers</em><br />
9. <em>Prometheus</em><br />
8. <em>World War Z</em><br />
7. <em>This is Forty 8</em><br />
6. <em>The Amazing Spider-Man</em><br />
5. <em>Men in Black III</em><br />
4. <em>Moonrise Kingdom</em><br />
3. <em>Django Unchained</em><br />
2. <em>The Dark Knight Rises</em><br />
1. <em>The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey</em></p>
<p><strong>Sean:</strong><br />
10. <em>Dog Fight</em><br />
9. <em>Brave</em><br />
8. <em>Lincoln</em><br />
7. <em>Jeff Who Lives At Home</em><br />
6. <em>The Master</em><br />
5. <em>21 Jump Street</em><br />
4. <em>Moonrise Kingdom</em><br />
3. <em>Django Unchained</em><br />
2. <em>The Dark Knight Rises</em><br />
1. <em>The Avengers</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4852</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/2012-02-02.mp3" length="28107046" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>t3</itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:subtitle>This Thursday, the gang came up with a topic so partisan, so biased, that they decided to present their lists independently. That&#039;s right, it&#039;s their most anticipated movies of the year. How does one rank anticipation? Who knows.</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>This Thursday, the gang came up with a topic so partisan, so biased, that they decided to present their lists independently. That&#039;s right, it&#039;s their most anticipated movies of the year. How does one rank anticipation? Who knows. But one thing&#039;s for sure, the guy&#039;s definitely did talk about films they want to see. Well, except for Colin, he talks about the movies he doesn&#039;t really want to see at all. And Matt, who finally joined in on the, is really just along for the ride. John definitely has a list, though. Sean does too, along with a bunch of failed segues. Damn it if this is not the most compelling podcast of the year!

Press that &quot;Continue Reading&quot; button to spoil the show for yourself and find out who we talk about more - The Rock or Channing Tatum.

Top Ways to Listen:
[iTunes] Subscribe to T3 on iTunes
[RSS] Subscribe to the T3 RSS feed
[MP3] Download the MP3





John:
10. The Avengers
9. Prometheus
8. World War Z
7. This is Forty 8
6. The Amazing Spider-Man
5. Men in Black III
4. Moonrise Kingdom
3. Django Unchained
2. The Dark Knight Rises
1. The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey

Sean:
10. Dog Fight
9. Brave
8. Lincoln
7. Jeff Who Lives At Home
6. The Master
5. 21 Jump Street
4. Moonrise Kingdom
3. Django Unchained
2. The Dark Knight Rises
1. The Avengers</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Mildly Pleased</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>58:33</itunes:duration>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Extremely Annoying and Incredibly Insensitive</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4816</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4816#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 09:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close Maybe this film isn&#8217;t as bad as my title suggests but I couldn&#8217;t resist making fun of it when there are so many possibilities. So why did someone like me who so closely monitors reviews see this film? Because I make it my mission every year to see every film [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/elaic.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><em>Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/2.5.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Maybe this film isn&#8217;t as bad as my title suggests but I couldn&#8217;t resist making fun of it when there are so many possibilities. So why did someone like me who so closely monitors reviews see this film? Because I make it my mission every year to see every film nominated for best picture and I suppose every film deserves it&#8217;s day in court. Although now I can tell you that <em>Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close</em> is probably the least interesting Oscar nominated movie I&#8217;ve seen since <em>The Reader</em>, also a Stephen Daldry film. I wouldn&#8217;t go as far saying <em>Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close</em> is a bad movie, it&#8217;s just really average, and hardly Oscar quality. A lot of critics have gone as far to saying that this movie is offensive and I think I can see why, but I&#8217;ll get to that later.</p>
<p>Oscar Schell (Thomas Horn) is a bright but emotionally awkward young boy coping with the death of his father (Tom Hanks) who died in 9/11. From flashbacks we learn that Oscar&#8217;s father used to send him on scavenger hunts or &#8220;reconnaissance missions&#8221; to teach him life lessons. A year later in 2002 Oscar discovers a key in an envelope marked &#8220;Black&#8221; in his father&#8217;s closet and believes this to be a final mission. Oscar then sets out by tracking down everyone with the last name of &#8220;Black&#8221; in all of New York in an attempt to discover the key&#8217;s secret. It&#8217;s a ridiculous premise but still interesting to watch how it unfolds, at least it would be if it wasn&#8217;t bogged down by so much melodrama.</p>
<p>In-between all the searching we get a lot of flashbacks of Oscar and his mom (Sandra Bullock) dealing with their grief. I understand this is a story that uses 9/11 to setup the chain of events but I&#8217;d much rather see the story progress than watch scene after scene of Oscar and his mom yelling and crying at each other. Thomas Horn gives a strong performance as Oscar but his character is so unsympathetic and annoying that I just wish he&#8217;d shut the hell up. Oscar is rude, insensitive, and a real know-it-all, which makes it really hard for to get behind his little self-centered scavenger hunt. The other characters feel fairly stock although ably performed, most notably Max Von Sydow as a mute renter living with Oscar&#8217;s grandmother. A lot of people have criticized Von Sydow getting a Best Supporting Actor nomination but it is my opinion that it&#8217;s deserved, I just would of liked to see him say something.</p>
<p>So what makes <em>Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close</em> insensitive? A lot of critics have pointed out a recurring cutaway shot of a jumper falling from the sky. It&#8217;s an odd choice but it didn&#8217;t make me uncomfortable until referenced in a later scene. Later there&#8217;s a scene where Oscar is showing the mute renter pictures of a jumper on 9/11 that Oscar believes is his father. Not only is that morbid thought for a child to have but it seems insensitive to the people that actually did jump from the towers. Using such a tragic occurrence as an artistic statement or plot device feels like an insult. Even worse Oscar puts together a scrapbook that has a page where you pull out a tab and a man falls from a drawing of a man falls from a drawing of the towers. I&#8217;m sure they had some kind of message but the visual is so dark and depressing, it makes me very uncomfortable.</p>
<p>Aside from all the iffy handling of sensitive subject matter this film is fairly drawn out. Eric Roth, known for his lengthy and complexly detailed screenplays like <em>Forrest Gump</em> and <em>Curious Case of Benjamin Button</em> adapted the story but unlike those other two films this one is missing a key element &#8220;humor&#8221;. I&#8217;m aware this is serious subject matter but that doesn&#8217;t mean there can&#8217;t be some lighter moments as well. I suppose this film had some of those moments but they are so few and far between. The movie may have an intriguing mystery that&#8217;s somewhat entertaining but it&#8217;s too much of bummer. This isn&#8217;t the worse film but is it the worst film to ever be nominated for Best Picture? Maybe, I guess the Academy just loves the schmaltzy melodrama of Stephen Daldry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4816</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>T3 02: Top 10 Movies of 2011</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4812</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4812#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 07:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did you read John, Colin and Sean&#8217;s top 10 movie lists last week? If you liked those, you&#8217;re going to love this podcast. This week, those guys talk about their favorite movies of 2011, narrowing down all their personal preferences to a single list. What will make the cut? Who will feel the most betrayed? [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/t31.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><p>Did you read John, Colin and Sean&#8217;s top 10 movie lists last week? If you liked those, you&#8217;re going to love this podcast. This week, those guys talk about their favorite movies of 2011, narrowing down all their personal preferences to a single list. What will make the cut? Who will feel the most betrayed? How much time will be spent on <em>Fast Five</em>? Find out for yourself by using your ears!</p>
<p>Total listage after the break! Only go that far if your time is too damn valuable to be listening to us.</p>
<p><strong>Top Ways to Listen:</strong><br />
[<a href="http://www.itunes.com/podcast?id=501634977">iTunes</a>] Subscribe to T3 on iTunes<br />
[<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/toptenthursdays">RSS</a>] Subscribe to the T3 RSS feed<br />
[<a href="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/2012-01-24.mp3">MP3</a>] Download the MP3</p>

<p><span id="more-4812"></span></p>
<p>10. <em>Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy</em><br />
9. <em>50/50</em><br />
8. <em>The Guard</em><br />
7. <em>The Descendants</em><br />
6. <em>Midnight in Paris</em><br />
5. <em>Drive</em><br />
4. <em>Hugo</em><br />
3. <em>Moneyball</em><br />
2. <em>The Artist</em><br />
1. <em>The Tree of Life</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4812</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/2012-01-24.mp3" length="31138713" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>t3</itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:subtitle>Did you read John, Colin and Sean&#039;s top 10 movie lists last week? If you liked those, you&#039;re going to love this podcast. This week, those guys talk about their favorite movies of 2011, narrowing down all their personal preferences to a single list.</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Did you read John, Colin and Sean&#039;s top 10 movie lists last week? If you liked those, you&#039;re going to love this podcast. This week, those guys talk about their favorite movies of 2011, narrowing down all their personal preferences to a single list. What will make the cut? Who will feel the most betrayed? How much time will be spent on Fast Five? Find out for yourself by using your ears!

Total listage after the break! Only go that far if your time is too damn valuable to be listening to us.

Top Ways to Listen:
[iTunes] Subscribe to T3 on iTunes
[RSS] Subscribe to the T3 RSS feed
[MP3] Download the MP3





10. Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy
9. 50/50
8. The Guard
7. The Descendants
6. Midnight in Paris
5. Drive
4. Hugo
3. Moneyball
2. The Artist
1. The Tree of Life</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Mildly Pleased</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>1:04:52</itunes:duration>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sean&#8217;s Top 10 Movies of 2011</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4773</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4773#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 06:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Ten]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Something changed me this afternoon. After feeling like I hadn&#8217;t seen &#8220;enough&#8221; movies from last year, like I wasn&#8217;t worthy of an opinion on the medium for 2011, I reread Colin&#8217;s top 10. And, having gotten past the weirdness that is Colin&#8217;s choice not to write about movies he likes, something stood out to me. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/img27.jpeg" width="240" />
		</p><p>Something changed me this afternoon. After feeling like I hadn&#8217;t seen &#8220;enough&#8221; movies from last year, like I wasn&#8217;t worthy of an opinion on the medium for 2011, I reread Colin&#8217;s top 10. And, having gotten past the weirdness that is Colin&#8217;s choice not to write about movies he likes, something stood out to me. He saw 32 movies last year. I saw 30. We had taken different paths, but we had gotten to basically the same destination. Now, sure, Colin saw a lot more critical darlings than I did, and I&#8217;m sure John blows both of us completely out of the water, but at least I got to have a little swim first.</p>
<p><span id="more-4773"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Harry-Potter-and-the-Deathly-Hallows-Part-2-trailer-screencaps.jpeg"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Harry-Potter-and-the-Deathly-Hallows-Part-2-trailer-screencaps-479x202.jpg" alt="" title="Harry-Potter-and-the-Deathly-Hallows-Part-2-trailer-screencaps" width="479" height="202" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-4777" /></a></p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;">10. <em>Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows &#8211; Part 2</em></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>There were a lot of great sequels in 2011, and it was hard to choose the one that made my list. I had a lot of fun with <em>Fast Five</em> and I think <em>Ghost Protocol</em> might be the best <em>Mission: Impossible</em> yet, but I&#8217;m going with the wizards. Sure, it is a bit weak that they stretched the last movie into two movies, but I didn&#8217;t feel cheated by either of the <em>Deathly Hallows</em> experiences. In fact, the second part is possibly the best entry in the series, as it is not really bogged down by exposition at all. Like I said in my <a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?p=930">review</a>, there probably won&#8217;t be something as huge as this series for a long time.</p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Hanna-1721.jpeg"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Hanna-1721-479x203.jpg" alt="" title="Hanna-1721" width="479" height="203" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-4779" /></a></p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;">9. <em>Hanna</em></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>I had a few really fun theater-going experiences in 2011, but I don&#8217;t think any of them top the zaniness of seeing <em>Hanna</em> in a totally empty theater with a few friends. That might color my impression of the movie, but it&#8217;s not like this list isn&#8217;t already entirely subjective. Saoirse Ronan turns in another great performance while Cate Blanchett plays an otherwise scary villain with a hilarious accent. A really cool action film with a neat Chemical Brothers score.</p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/13a14.jpeg"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/13a14-479x198.jpg" alt="" title="13a14" width="479" height="198" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-4781" /></a></p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;">8. <em>13 Assassins</em></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>I think the last new samurai movie I saw was <em>The Last Samurai</em>, you know, the Tom Cruise movie. It just doesn&#8217;t seem like we get a lot of these kind of movies over here. I felt like Miike was definitely channeling Kurosawa in this brutal epic, I mean, even the title is obvious inspired by <em>The Seven Samurai</em>. I don&#8217;t know if you remember this about me, but I&#8217;m a pretty big Kurosawa fan. Plus, it was fun to annoy John when I disagreed with the subtitles.</p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/normal_josephzooeyweb091.jpeg"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/normal_josephzooeyweb091.jpeg" alt="" title="normal_josephzooeyweb091" width="479" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4783" /></a></p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;">7. <em>50/50</em></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Finally, not an action movie, am I right? As someone who&#8217;s seen family members deal with cancer and terminal disease, I found <em>50/50</em> an extremely relatable and affecting movie. Seriously, it&#8217;s the drama half of this dramedy that stuck with me. Not that it wasn&#8217;t funny, it really was one of 2011&#8242;s funniest. They named a greyhound Skeletor! That&#8217;s awesome! I wish I had come up with that.</p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/hugo-3.jpeg"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/hugo-3-479x247.jpg" alt="" title="hugo 3" width="479" height="247" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-4786" /></a></p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;">6. <em>Hugo</em></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Martin Scorsese makes his case for 3D movies. Except, not really. He more just makes a case for&#8230; movies. After seeing <em>Hugo</em>, I spent a little of time reflecting on what film means to me &#8211; wondering if I ever had as profound an experience in theaters as the characters in this movie had. I think seeing <em>2001</em> in Cinerama is as close as I&#8217;ve gotten. Anyway, never before have I found super creepy robot children so charming. Yes, not even in <em>AI</em>.</p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/01_copy0_original.jpeg"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/01_copy0_original-479x204.jpg" alt="" title="01_copy0_original" width="479" height="204" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-4787" /></a></p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;">5. <em>The Guard</em></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>I like the part when he says the racist thing so sincerely you can&#8217;t even tell wether he&#8217;s really smart or really dumb. I guess that&#8217;s most of the movie. There&#8217;s something funny of those people, with those accents, saying what they say. I think an f-bomb is funniest when dropped with an Irish accent is what I&#8217;m trying to say, I guess. And you know what, beyond all the humor is a pretty cool action movie too. How about that? No, state. Oregon, Idaho, Pacific Ocean.</p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Moneyball-Trailer-moneyball-23187184-1280-688.jpeg"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Moneyball-Trailer-moneyball-23187184-1280-688-479x257.jpg" alt="" title="Moneyball-Trailer-moneyball-23187184-1280-688" width="479" height="257" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-4788" /></a></p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;">4. <em>Moneyball</em></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>I ended up seeing this in theaters twice within a 24-hour period. So I liked it? Yeah, I did. Everything from black Raul Ibanez to fat Jonah Hill. I think you could even make the case that this is the best of Brad Pitt&#8217;s performances last year. I wasn&#8217;t really worried about the writing of <em>Moneyball</em>, since I saw who did the screenplay, but I was concerned if the appeal would be limited to Oakland fans, or baseball nerds. No way that&#8217;s the case. You don&#8217;t have to understand all the technical details (I sure didn&#8217;t) to have a great time with this one (I sure did).</p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/the-artist-movie-trailer.jpeg"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/the-artist-movie-trailer-479x335.jpg" alt="" title="the-artist-movie-trailer" width="479" height="335" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-4789" /></a></p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;">3. <em>The Artist</em></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>This movie is a real punch in the balls for blind people. As if they didn&#8217;t already have things hard enough! Yet, somehow it overcomes its disabilities to provide an enchanting story in the most classic filmic form. I don&#8217;t know if you know this about me, but I&#8217;m a little embarrassed to admit 2011 was the year I saw <em>Singin&#8217; in the Rain</em> for the first time. Having that frame of reference really helped, but honestly <em>The Artist</em> is fun for anyone who likes John Goodman and/or light reading.</p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/tumblr_ls5pfpXPBj1qg425ho1_500.jpeg"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/tumblr_ls5pfpXPBj1qg425ho1_500-479x245.jpg" alt="" title="tumblr_ls5pfpXPBj1qg425ho1_500" width="479" height="245" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-4790" /></a></p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;">2. <em>Drive</em></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Can you think of a cooler first sequence than the one that opens <em>Drive</em>? While you&#8217;re thinking about that, think about this: Albert Brooks, the lovable fish from <em>Finding Nemo</em>, played the scary bad guy. Remember him? That was the fish! Oh, and here&#8217;s a doozy: remember that other movie that came out in 2011, you know the one, <em>Crazy, Stupid, Love</em>? Remember the guy who told Steve Carell that wearing New Balance shoes isn&#8217;t cool? That&#8217;s the same guy who wore the jacket in <em>Drive</em>! That&#8217;s right, I&#8217;m blowing this thing wide open, baby.</p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/TreeOfLife1.jpeg"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/TreeOfLife1-479x245.jpg" alt="" title="TreeOfLife1" width="479" height="245" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-4792" /></a></p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;">1. <em>The Tree of Life</em></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>The <em>Tree of Life</em> is an amazing movie. Any idiot who walked out of it and had the gall to demand a refund will surely live the rest of their sad life drenched in melancholia and shame. While <em>Hugo</em> may have reminded people of the transportive power of cinema, this film embodies it. It&#8217;s a challenging, flabbergasting experience that I&#8217;m sure will stand the test of time. In many years, I&#8217;ll tell people about how fortunate I was to see <em>The Tree of Life</em> in theaters on it&#8217;s first run. They won&#8217;t be impressed or really care, but I&#8217;ll tell them anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4773</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Colin&#8217;s Top 10 Movies of 2011</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4733</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4733#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 10:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Ten]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For me 2011 seemed like a pretty solid year for movies, not spectacular or anything, but solid.  It does seem like the harder-to-see indie films continue to be generally more impressive while the big budget films appear to be getting dumber and lazier.  Yet at the same time, I found many of the more heralded [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me 2011 seemed like a pretty solid year for movies, not spectacular or anything, but solid.  It does seem like the harder-to-see indie films continue to be generally more impressive while the big budget films appear to be getting dumber and lazier.  Yet at the same time, I found many of the more heralded indie films to be a bit overhyped, so my list for the most part falls somewhere in to that middle ground between the indies and the studio pictures.  Saw 32 movies this year, by the way.</p>
<p><span id="more-4733"></span></p>
<p><strong>Honorable Mentions:</strong><br />
The Trip<br />
Shame<br />
Drive</p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4734" rel="attachment wp-att-4734"><img class="alignleft size-large wp-image-4734" title="50-50-movie-Review_full_600" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/50-50-movie-Review_full_600-479x319.jpg" alt="" width="479" height="319" /></a></p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span style="font-size: x-large;">10. </span><em><span style="font-size: x-large;">50/50</span></em></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Comedies tend to get overlooked on these kinds of lists, so I felt like I should give some love to <em>50/50</em>.  I mean this after all is a &#8220;cancer comedy&#8221;, which should not even be a thing, but somehow <em>50/50</em> manages to be very funny while also capturing the tribulations of dealing with cancer in a way that for the most part feels completely believable.  Also, I cherish any opportunity to see Philip Baker Hall.  The fact that he&#8217;s always playing characters who are sick/dying worries me.</p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4735" rel="attachment wp-att-4735"><img class="alignleft size-large wp-image-4735" title="weekendmovie" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/weekendmovie-479x341.jpg" alt="" width="479" height="341" /></a></p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span style="font-size: x-large;">9. </span><em><span style="font-size: x-large;">Weekend</span></em></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Honestly, <em>Drive</em> should be on this list, but I already have a few too many movies in common with John&#8217;s list, so I subbed <em>Drive</em> out for this movie about gay British dudes.  <em>Weekend</em> is a very simple but nonetheless engaging series of conversations in which we see these two strangers connecting romantically over these very small moments.  These moments run the gamut from explicit, to funny, to psychologically revealing, but I always felt fascinated by these characters and their conflicting lifestyles.</p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4736" rel="attachment wp-att-4736"><img class="alignleft size-large wp-image-4736" title="tinker-tailor-soldier-spy-review" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/tinker-tailor-soldier-spy-review-479x319.jpg" alt="" width="479" height="319" /></a></p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span style="font-size: x-large;">8. </span><em><span style="font-size: x-large;">Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy</span></em></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>I think I&#8217;m starting to find that I enjoy films that are so intricately plotted that they practically demand that you pay attention to every detail.  <em>Tinker Tailor</em> certainly does not do the audience any favors by making John Le Carre&#8217;s source material easy to digest, and the film is made even more inscrutable with it&#8217;s detached but seductively cool nature.  Regardless, I was very surprised by how wrapped up I was with this film by the time it reached its conclusion, and I&#8217;m looking forward to seeing it again.</p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4737" rel="attachment wp-att-4737"><img class="alignleft size-large wp-image-4737" title="The-Skin-I-Live-In" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/The-Skin-I-Live-In-479x318.jpg" alt="" width="479" height="318" /></a></p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span style="font-size: x-large;">7. </span><em><span style="font-size: x-large;">The Skin I Live In</span></em></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Ever since I saw Pedro Almodovar&#8217;s masterful <em>Talk To Her</em>, he&#8217;s basically become my favorite contemporary foreign director.  <em>The Skin I Live In</em> shows that Almodovar still has the ability to shock viewers with some very lurid subject matter that plays off of Almodovar&#8217;s signature themes of gender identity.  But more than anything, this is a captivatingly taut thriller that just seems to become more engaging as the story reveals itself to be pretty crazy and disturbing.</p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4739" rel="attachment wp-att-4739"><img class="alignleft size-large wp-image-4739" title="moneyball05" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/moneyball05-479x319.jpg" alt="" width="479" height="319" /></a></p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span style="font-size: x-large;">6. </span><em><span style="font-size: x-large;">Moneyball</span></em></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>I was among the many people who thought that making a movie of a number-driven book like <em>Moneyball</em> would be quite difficult, though not impossible.  Of course when you hand the job to two veteran writers like Steve Zaillian and Aaron Sorkin, it&#8217;s not nearly as surprising that the film is as good as it is. Tonally, director Bennett Miller finds just the right mixture of stat-nerd savvy and underdog sports movie, and subsequently knocks it out of the park (stupid baseball pun!).</p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4740" rel="attachment wp-att-4740"><img class="alignleft size-large wp-image-4740" title="artist6" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/artist6-479x318.jpg" alt="" width="479" height="318" /></a></p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span style="font-size: x-large;">5. </span><em><span style="font-size: x-large;">The Artist</span></em></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>As many of my colleagues know, I&#8217;m a sucker for things that are old and classy.  <em>The Artist</em> therefore was just a movie that I couldn&#8217;t really help but fall for, and I&#8217;m still surprised that it&#8217;s still playing in about ten theaters nationwide despite being the Oscar favorite.  Just because it&#8217;s in black and white and has no sound doesn&#8217;t mean audiences are too dumb to enjoy it!  Then again that stupid Mark Wahlberg movie was #1 at the box office last week, so what do I know?</p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4741" rel="attachment wp-att-4741"><img class="alignleft size-large wp-image-4741" title="Hugo_full_600" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Hugo_full_600-479x319.jpg" alt="" width="479" height="319" /></a></p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span style="font-size: x-large;">4. </span><em><span style="font-size: x-large;">Hugo</span></em></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>And then there was also that other movie about silent cinema which also managed to be pretty damn charming.  At this point, I did not think Martin Scorsese would be able to pull off a 3-D children&#8217;s film, but I think as long as Scorsese has some sort of personal connection to his subject matter, he can still do pretty great things.  <em>Hugo</em> not only has that personal element but finally gives the director to create a love letter to cinema&#8217;s past while using the visual techniques of the future.  Not an easy feat.</p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4742" rel="attachment wp-att-4742"><img class="alignleft size-large wp-image-4742" title="The-Descendants-leads-LA-critics-awards-1NMR9A0-x-large" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/The-Descendants-leads-LA-critics-awards-1NMR9A0-x-large-479x351.jpg" alt="" width="479" height="351" /></a></p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span style="font-size: x-large;">3. </span><em><span style="font-size: x-large;">The Descendants</span></em></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>It&#8217;s a shame there was such a huge gap between <em>Sideways</em> and <em>The Descendants</em>, since Alexander Payne&#8217;s films just seem to be getting more and more fully realized.  <em>The Descendants</em> shows once again that he&#8217;s got a great feel for setting and communities, while imbuing them with characters that are always entertaining to watch.  Honestly, I don&#8217;t think I would even mind if he continued making more dramatic films like this as long as he continues to flourish with his distinctly un-Hollywood depictions of American life.</p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4743" rel="attachment wp-att-4743"><img class="alignleft size-large wp-image-4743" title="Midnight_in_Paris_2" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Midnight_in_Paris_2-479x318.jpg" alt="" width="479" height="318" /></a></p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span style="font-size: x-large;">2. </span><em><span style="font-size: x-large;">Midnight In Paris</span></em></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>In the past year, I feel like I came to really realize how obsessed I am with Woody Allen and how much his films mean to me, and <em>Midnight In Paris</em> may have had a part in that.  With some of the other films on this list, I talked about directors&#8217; abilities to surprise us with their versatility, but there isn&#8217;t really anything surprising about <em>Midnight In Paris</em>.  It&#8217;s just pure Woody, and that&#8217;s alright with me.  Still, he manages to really tap in to something kind of magical with this movie and I think I&#8217;m going to force myself to see every Woody Allen movie that comes out from here on out.  I think I owe it to the man.</p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4744" rel="attachment wp-att-4744"><img class="alignleft size-large wp-image-4744" title="CA.0525.tree.of.live." src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/treeoflife-479x319.jpg" alt="" width="479" height="319" /></a></p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span style="font-size: x-large;">1. </span><em><span style="font-size: x-large;">The Tree Of Life</span></em></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure that there&#8217;s ever been a film that has caused me to look at life as a whole differently, but if there ever was one, it&#8217;d probably be <em>The Tree Of Life</em>.  After seeing it, I just remember coming out of the theater in a daze, not really sure of why I was put on this planet, or what the hell I had just sat through, but I knew there was something monumentally profound about it nonetheless.  And on the surface it seems pretty silly, considering I spend so much time watching movies that you&#8217;d think I would be completely desensitized from having such a revelatory experience watching a film, but somehow <em>The Tree Of Life</em> did that for me, and I&#8217;ll never forget it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4733</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>T3 01: Top 10 TV Shows of 2011</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4716</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4716#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 08:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new year means changes, especially at the ever-changing Mildly Pleased. We&#8217;ve thrown our hats into the podcasting ring once again, this time with the goal of turning our former T3 feature into a weekly show. So, come back every week for Top 10 Thursdays, where we&#8217;ll try our best to formulate a top 10 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/t31.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><p>A new year means changes, especially at the ever-changing Mildly Pleased. We&#8217;ve thrown our hats into the podcasting ring once again, this time with the goal of turning our former T3 feature into a weekly show. So, come back every week for Top 10 Thursdays, where we&#8217;ll try our best to formulate a top 10 list based on a topic of almost random choosing!</p>
<p>This week, Sean, John and Colin discuss their favorite TV shows of 2011 as they try their best to narrow their list down to just 10 shows? Will they do it? Or will this podcast be an absolute failure right from the get-go?</p>
<p>Take the jump to spoil the show and reveal the list.</p>
<p><strong>Top Ways to Listen:</strong><br />
[<a href="http://www.itunes.com/podcast?id=501634977">iTunes</a>] Subscribe to T3 on iTunes<br />
[<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/toptenthursdays">RSS</a>] Subscribe to the T3 RSS feed<br />
[<a href="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/2012-01-14.mp3">MP3</a>] Download the MP3</p>

<p><span id="more-4716"></span></p>
<p>10. <em>Curb Your Enthusiasm</em><br />
9. <em>Treme</em><br />
8. <em>It&#8217;s Always Sunny in Philadelphia</em><br />
7. <em>Community</em><br />
6. <em>Friday Night Lights</em><br />
5. <em>Homeland</em><br />
4. <em>Game of Thrones</em><br />
3. <em>Parks and Recreation</em><br />
2. <em>Louie</em><br />
1. <em>Breaking Bad</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4716</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/2012-01-14.mp3" length="30852620" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:keywords>t3</itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:subtitle>A new year means changes, especially at the ever-changing Mildly Pleased. We&#039;ve thrown our hats into the podcasting ring once again, this time with the goal of turning our former T3 feature into a weekly show. So,</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>A new year means changes, especially at the ever-changing Mildly Pleased. We&#039;ve thrown our hats into the podcasting ring once again, this time with the goal of turning our former T3 feature into a weekly show. So, come back every week for Top 10 Thursdays, where we&#039;ll try our best to formulate a top 10 list based on a topic of almost random choosing!

This week, Sean, John and Colin discuss their favorite TV shows of 2011 as they try their best to narrow their list down to just 10 shows? Will they do it? Or will this podcast be an absolute failure right from the get-go?

Take the jump to spoil the show and reveal the list.

Top Ways to Listen:
[iTunes] Subscribe to T3 on iTunes
[RSS] Subscribe to the T3 RSS feed
[MP3] Download the MP3





10. Curb Your Enthusiasm
9. Treme
8. It&#039;s Always Sunny in Philadelphia
7. Community
6. Friday Night Lights
5. Homeland
4. Game of Thrones
3. Parks and Recreation
2. Louie
1. Breaking Bad</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Mildly Pleased</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>1:04:16</itunes:duration>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>John&#8217;s Top 10 Movies of 2011</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4605</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4605#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 06:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Ten]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every year I try to see all the movies I can and I&#8217;m still never ready for this list. I think I&#8217;ve done a good job seeing most of the year&#8217;s critically lauded films. My only regrets for 2011 is that I didn&#8217;t see Shame, Take Shelter, or the last Harry Potter, though that last [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every year I try to see all the movies I can and I&#8217;m still never ready for this list. I think I&#8217;ve done a good job seeing most of the year&#8217;s critically lauded films. My only regrets for 2011 is that I didn&#8217;t see <em>Shame</em>, <em>Take Shelter</em>, or the last <em>Harry Potter</em>, though that last one was just because of my own laziness. All that aside as long as I can settle on ten films I like I&#8217;m happy so here they are.</p>
<p><span id="more-4605"></span></p>
<p><strong>Honorable Mention</strong><br />
The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo<br />
Source Code<br />
TrollHunter</p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4607" rel="attachment wp-att-4607"><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-4607" title="Drive-2011-Movie-Image-3" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Drive-2011-Movie-Image-3-479x318.jpg" alt="" width="479" height="299" /></a></p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;">10. <em>Drive</em></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><em>Drive</em> is a film that really took me for a left turn. With it&#8217;s wide release I expected <em>Drive</em> to be Nicolas Winding Refn&#8217;s most accessible film yet and instead I felt the exact opposite. That may sound like criticism but quite the contrary, I&#8217;m glad that <em>Drive</em> is the existential thinking man&#8217;s action thriller that it is. <em>Drive</em> may seem subtle on the surface but it&#8217;s exceedingly stylish. The cinematography captures L.A.&#8217;s. landscape in a way I&#8217;ve never seen and the retro synth soundtrack compliments it perfectly. Like Refn&#8217;s brooding yet beautiful films  <em>Bronson</em> and <em>Valhalla Rising</em>, <em>Drive</em> is unconventional in almost every way and that&#8217;s a rare treat today.</p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4656" rel="attachment wp-att-4656"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-4656" title="WC9V4530.tif" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/warrior2011-brotheragainstbrother-300x190.jpg" alt="" width="479" height="299" /></a></p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;">9. <em>Warrior</em></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>If you had told me at the starting of 2011 that I would have a film about UFC fighting on my top ten movies list I would have been convinced you had brain damage. <em>Warrior</em> is this year&#8217;s answer to <em>The Fighter</em>, both are about competitive fighting and both are about a complex relationship between brothers. What makes <em>Warrior</em> stand out is that it&#8217;s what many sports movies aren&#8217;t &#8220;unpredictable&#8221;. Who will win? Brendan (Joel Edgerton) the likable high school teacher in financial dire? Or his brother Tommy (Tom Hardy) a former marine with a dark past and nothing left? This has the potential to become one of those films that can bring even the manliest of men to tears.</p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4661" rel="attachment wp-att-4661"><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-4661" title="midnight 20s twi" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/midnight-20s-twi-479x319.png" alt="" width="479" height="299" /></a></p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;">8. <em>Midnight in Paris </em></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>A movie so charming and witty it could only come from a legend like Woody Allen. <em>Midnight in Paris</em> is the perfect blending of fantasy and humor complete with a talented supporting as some of the greatest artistic legends of 1920s. Not only is <em>Midnight in Paris</em> a delightful romantic comedy but it&#8217;s a fun twist on the time travel genre as well. Woody may misfire from time to time but you&#8217;d still be hard pressed to find another writer/director who puts so much wit and heart into his films, this has all that and more.</p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4673" rel="attachment wp-att-4673"><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-4673" title="27tree-span-articleLarge-v2" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/27tree-span-articleLarge-v2-479x251.jpg" alt="" width="479" height="289" /></a></p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;">7. <em>The Tree of Life</em></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><em>The Tree of Life</em> is no more a movie than a ballet of images and sounds. Terrence Malick is in a world of his own and even though I may not always understand what he&#8217;s trying to say, it&#8217;s an amazing journey nonetheless. <em>Tree of Life</em> could of potentially made this list for it&#8217;s creation of earth sequence alone by master effects veteran Douglas Trumbull (<em>2001: A Space Odyssey</em>, <em>Blade Runner</em>.) Visuals aside there&#8217;s also a strikingly real story about people in <em>The Tree of Life</em> that poses some powerful questions. I don&#8217;t think any two people are supposed to walk away with the exact same message and that&#8217;s part of the beauty of it.</p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4678" rel="attachment wp-att-4678"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4678" title="The-Descendants-007" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/The-Descendants-007.jpg" alt="" width="479" height="299" /></a></p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;">6. <em>The Descendants </em></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if there&#8217;s anyone else in the biz right now that can craft a better dramedy than Alexander Payne. He can entertain you one minute and then make you feel something the next and that&#8217;s not an easy task. In addition <em>The Descendants</em> may have one of the best ensemble casts of the year with George Clooney and Shailene Woodley being the most prominent standouts. Just as well captured as any of the cast is the film&#8217;s lavish Hawaiian setting that captures the state in a way I can&#8217;t recall ever seeing. <em>The Descendants</em> has it&#8217;s highs and lows but is ultimately a rewarding experience.</p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4681" rel="attachment wp-att-4681"><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-4681" title="1132854 - Attack The Block" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/attack-the-block-moses-gang-hoods-thugs-479x318.jpg" alt="" width="479" height="299" /></a></p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;">5. <em>Attack the Block </em></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>It feels strange to have a list featuring so many Oscar friendly selections only to throw in a film about invading aliens, but I found <em>Attack the Block</em> to be one of my most satisfying movie experiences of the year. Not only was <em>Attack the Block</em> my favorite sci-fi film of the year but also my favorite horror, comedy, and action film of 2011. The thrills are big and the laughs are even bigger in this B-movie style smorgasbord. With a debut like this writer/director Joe Cornish could be the next Edgar Wright. Then again Cornish may not be that far off, he and Wright were two of the co-writers of <em>The Adventures of Tintin</em>.</p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4684" rel="attachment wp-att-4684"><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-4684" title="hugo-2011-movie" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/hugo-2011-movie-479x319.jpg" alt="" width="479" height="299" /></a></p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;">4. <em>Hugo</em></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Here is one that really captured my imagination. <em>Hugo</em> is an inspirational and insightful effects laden look into who else but the man who invented special effects. The story may be fiction but <em>Hugo</em> truly captures the spirit of Georges Melies and celebrates his passion to create. Scorsese has delivered a labor of love with a simple story in a very pleasing package. What I love the most about <em>Hugo</em> is it celebrates the movies in a way that only a true movie lover like Scorsese could.</p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4689" rel="attachment wp-att-4689"><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-4689" title="moneyball" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/moneyball-479x258.jpg" alt="" width="479" height="289" /></a></p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;">3. <em>Moneyball</em></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>A funny, informative, and occasionally dramatic look behind the scenes of America&#8217;s pastime. Entertaining for sports fans and non-sports fans, <em>Moneyball</em> maybe the most honest film ever made about baseball. The script by heavy hitters Aaron Sorkin and Steve Zaillian is smart and punchy but still flows naturally. In some ways watching <em>Moneyball</em> is like watching a documentary, so much information but in a very accessible way.</p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4690" rel="attachment wp-att-4690"><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-4690" title="2011_the_artist_001" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/2011_the_artist_001-479x261.jpg" alt="" width="479" height="289" /></a></p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;">2. <em>The Artist</em></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>In an age of over extravagant computer effects and bloated 3D it&#8217;s nice to see a film that hearkens back to a simpler time. <em>The Artist</em> reminds us why we love the movies. People won&#8217;t care about effects, color, or even dialogue as long as you can give them a compelling story with interesting characters. <em>The Artist</em> has to be the most surprising &#8220;Feel Good Movie of the Year&#8221; you could have but I have no problem with that. My fingers will be crossed for this one to win big at the next Oscars.</p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4691" rel="attachment wp-att-4691"><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-4691" title="2011_the_guard_001" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/2011_the_guard_001-479x319.jpg" alt="" width="479" height="299" /></a></p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;">1. <em>The Guard </em></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>This was was a movie I knew a lot of people wouldn&#8217;t see so I made it my mission to annoy everyone to death until they checked it out. Not since <em>In Bruges</em> have I been so impressed with a dark comedy which makes it no surprise that writer/director John Michael McDonagh is none other than <em>In Bruges&#8217;</em> writer/director Martin McDonagh&#8217;s brother. <em>The Guard</em> charms with it&#8217;s excellent cast (particularly Brendan Gleeson) portraying genuinely conflicted and relatable characters. Sergeant Gerry Boyle (Gleeson) is no saint, he has a penchant for prostitutes, he&#8217;s stubborn, unintentionally racist and yet you love him because of these flaws. Everyone has their quirks and oddball dilemmas and the result is something that is funny, thrilling, and even moving. The dialogue unravels like Quentin Tarantino (If he was from Ireland) with hints of the Coen brothers and that&#8217;s not something I can say about too many people. I don&#8217;t even know which McDonagh brother I like better now, as long as they keep making off-beat dramedies like this I will be a happy moviegoer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4605</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Building a Better World</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4580</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4580#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 19:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bastion Let me tell you about a kid. Actually, no, let the narrator tell you about him. You see, what we&#8217;ve got here is a game that turned narration into a gameplay mechanic. It&#8217;s crazy and risky and it totally helps Bastion stand out as not only a great story, but one of last year&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/bastion.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><em>Bastion</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/5.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Let me tell you about a kid. Actually, no, let the narrator tell you about him. You see, what we&#8217;ve got here is a game that turned narration into a gameplay mechanic. It&#8217;s crazy and risky and it totally helps <em>Bastion</em> stand out as not only a great story, but one of last year&#8217;s best games.</p>
<p><span id="more-4580"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/bastion1.jpg"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/bastion1-479x269.jpg" alt="" title="bastion" width="479" height="269" class="alignleft size-large wp-image-4727" /></a></p>
<p>There&#8217;s not much I can say about the story without ruining the fun of discovering it, so I&#8217;ll simply give you the simple premise: The kid wakes up after the Calamity, a terrible event that destroyed the world. Where you go from there is a sorrowful journey that is best made without knowing the destination, but needless to say, the kid isn&#8217;t the only one who survived. In fact, it seems like someone is watching him the entire time.</p>
<p>The game gives you a hub to play from, the titular Bastion, from which you can go out on missions. Beyond story levels, there are also arenas for you to try your mastery of weapons out and a few wave-based challenge areas where you can try to set a high score. Instead of having vague difficulty options, <em>Bastion</em> gives you a neat idols mechanic. Basically, you can enable certain idols, each correlating to one of the game&#8217;s gods, and they will increase certain aspects of the difficulty, while also increasing your rewards. Yeah, this game is really well thought out. Once you&#8217;re in it, it never lets you out.</p>
<p>The narration is most oppressive at the start of the game. It seems that this mysterious voice has something to say about everything you do &#8211; whether you take some time to unnecessarily destroy boxes or if you accidentally roll off a ledge. It&#8217;s a gimmick you probably wouldn&#8217;t see in a big budget game, the risk of it being annoying or off-putting would be too high. But it really pays off, because the narration connected me to the story and the character. In so many games, you end up watching the story play out as you run down the path the developers left for you. Here, you&#8217;re doing the same, but it feels like you&#8217;re the one calling the shots. It&#8217;s a novel and amazing experience.</p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/bastion2.jpg"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/bastion2-479x269.jpg" alt="" title="bastion2" width="479" height="269" class="alignleft size-large wp-image-4728" /></a></p>
<p>Of course, all that wouldn&#8217;t matter if it wasn&#8217;t fun being the kid. Fortunately, it&#8217;s a blast.<em> Bastion</em> is, on its surface, easy to play. You&#8217;ve got two weapon slots, a shield and a special attack. In no time at all, however, you&#8217;ll have built up a massive armory of unique weapons that require completely different strategies to use. A bow, for example, requires you to spend a moment drawing it, but its arrow can pass through multiple targets. On the other hand, a repeater can fire a quick barrage of shots, but for less damage and only hitting one target at a time. The combat is very deep and rewards you for mastering it. It&#8217;s flawless execution and the most fun I&#8217;ve ever had with this style of combat.</p>
<p>And the art. <em>Bastion</em> is a gorgeous game, substituting a distinct and wonderful art style in for technical prowess. It looks like nothing else on the market. And the animation is stupendous as well, characters move fluidly and responsively and the way that the floor rises up below the kid&#8217;s feet is impressive. A lot of people really love the soundtrack as well, though having the taint of knowing what GarageBand loops sound like made some songs distracting to me. Not that there aren&#8217;t great, wholly original songs in there, there&#8217;s just also some songs with some loops I know pretty well.</p>
<p>Bastion is a phenomenal game. I didn&#8217;t realize it until I started this review, but I can&#8217;t really fault any part of it. It&#8217;s fun, enthralling, pretty &#8211; basically it does everything every aspect as well as I could ever expect. Maybe even a little better than that. And, it&#8217;s a cheap downloadable game, that doesn&#8217;t hurt. I&#8217;ve already said this game was one of my favorites from last year, now I&#8217;m starting to wonder if it&#8217;s one of my favorites for years to come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4580</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dragon! Dragon! Rock the Dragon!</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4590</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4590#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 20:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo  Even though it came out well over a month ago I felt Mildly Pleased should have some kind acknowledgment of the US adaptation of Stigg Larsson&#8217;s bestseller The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo. Already adapted for Swedish audiences along with the other two installments of Larsson&#8217;s &#8220;The Millennium Trilogy&#8221; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/tgwtdt.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><em>The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo </em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Even though it came out well over a month ago I felt Mildly Pleased should have some kind acknowledgment of the US adaptation of Stigg Larsson&#8217;s bestseller <em>The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo</em>. Already adapted for Swedish audiences along with the other two installments of Larsson&#8217;s &#8220;The Millennium Trilogy&#8221; this version was helmed by the one and only David Finche, who has certainly left the touch of a true auter. <em>The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo</em> is a bleak and atmospheric thriller surrounding a thought provoking mystery that&#8217;s well complimented by a sharp screenplay and a stunning performance by Rooney Mara.</p>
<p><span id="more-4590"></span></p>
<p>Mikael Blomkvist (Daniel Craig) is a journalist for <em>Millennium</em> magazine just coming off of a well publicized libel case lost against a well known businessman. Despite the controversy Mikael is offered to help retired industrialist CEO Henrik Vanger (Christopher Plummer) with his memoirs, but more importantly to help him solve a 40 year family mystery. Decades ago Vanger&#8217;s beloved niece Harriet vanished and it is Henrik&#8217;s belief that she was murdered by someone within the family. Meanwhile we are introduced to talented hacker and freelance researcher Lisbeth Salander (Rooney Mara) who has recently been declared a ward of the state due to mental incompetency. After the passing of her legal guardian Lisbeth is put under the watch of lawyer Nils Bjurman, (Yorick van Wageningen) a closet sexual predator. Through a series of dark twists and turns these two characters path&#8217;s eventually cross and they decided to work together to unravel the dark secrets of the Vanger family.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s simply too much plot to cover in one review which would explain the film&#8217;s 158 minute run time. Having never read the book I can only assume this was done to cover as many details as possible and due to strength of the story and characters, the film is never boring. <em>Girl with the Dragon Tattoo</em> moves at a casual pace that gives the audience the chance to soak up all the details and let them stew around, as any good mystery should. Steve Zaillan who also co-wrote the screenplay to this year&#8217;s <em>Moneyball</em> has done an excellent job at taking such a dense amount of story and making it so accessible, and David Fincher has displayed it all in a style that I could only describe as truly &#8220;Fincher-esque.&#8221; What can you really say about him? He&#8217;s in a stylistic league of his own.</p>
<p>Fincher has really left his mark on this story but if I could only give one reason to see <em>The Girl with Dragon Tattoo</em> it would be to watch Rooney Mara. Lisbeth Salander is such a demanding character that it&#8217;s astonishing to watch an actress commit so much physically and mentally and still be so believable. Rooney Mara vanishes into the role and it&#8217;s hard to look away, hopefully the Oscars will put that into consideration. Daniel Craig plays Daniel Craig, it&#8217;s basically the same character he&#8217;s played in every movie he&#8217;s ever been in. He&#8217;s not bad, he&#8217;s fine, but he&#8217;s constantly overshadowed by the talent of Rooney Mara.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s on everyone&#8217;s mind now is whether the US version of <em>The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo</em> will become a franchise like it&#8217;s Swedish counterpart. I&#8217;m always interested in David Fincher taking on new projects, I have see all of his movies, but I wouldn&#8217;t mind a US version of <em>The Girl Who Played with Fire</em> and I would be even more excited if FIncher returned. Whatever happens I still enjoyed this film and will definitely put it into consideration for my &#8220;Best of 2011&#8243; list which is so close now that I can taste it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4590</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Ghost of a Chance</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4577</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4577#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 05:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mission: Impossible &#8211; Ghost Protocol After four films and four directors, I&#8217;m getting pretty optimistic about the Mission: Impossible franchise, although still not enough to go back to the original show. But, if you were to compare Ghost Protocol to other film fourths this year, like X-Men: First Class and Pirates of the Caribbean: on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/migp.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><em>Mission: Impossible &#8211; Ghost Protocol</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>After four films and four directors, I&#8217;m getting pretty optimistic about the <em>Mission: Impossible</em> franchise, although still not enough to go back to the original show. But, if you were to compare <em>Ghost Protocol</em> to other film fourths this year, like <em>X-Men: First Class</em> and <em>Pirates of the Caribbean: on Stranger Tides</em>, I think you&#8217;d agree with me that it&#8217;s pretty amazing this movie came out as fresh and fun as it did.</p>
<p><span id="more-4577"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Mission-Impossible-Ghost-Protocol-Stills-mission-impossible-ghost-protocol-27184472-1792-795.jpeg"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Mission-Impossible-Ghost-Protocol-Stills-mission-impossible-ghost-protocol-27184472-1792-795-479x212.jpg" alt="" title="Mission-Impossible-Ghost-Protocol-Stills-mission-impossible-ghost-protocol-27184472-1792-795" width="479" height="212" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-4809" /></a><br />
For the record, here&#8217;s how I stand on the preceding three films: The first <em>Mission: Impossible</em> is good, a more classical gadget-based spy movie with some pacing problems. The second one is a mess, but kind of fun in a pretty trainwreck sort of way. J.J. Abrams made the first really great entry in the series, which was a real surprise at the time. Perhaps even more surprising is that they turned the fourth entry over to Pixar-vet Brad Bird. But, proving that a good director is a good director, regardless if he&#8217;s directing people or cartoons, Bird does an amazing job with <em>Ghost Protocol</em>.</p>
<p>Series hero Ethan Hunt (the apparently ageless Tom Cruise) begins the movie imprisoned in Russia. He&#8217;s broken out by Simon Pegg, the only other returning cast member, and newcomer Paula Patton because, well, things are real bad on the outside. Before he even has a chance to take a shower without worrying about rape, Ethan and the rest of the IMF have been framed for some real bad shit and are on the run from just about everybody. The seeming everyman Jeremy Renner joins the team and together they four go off to save the world and clear their names.</p>
<p><em>Ghost Protocol</em> has some truly jaw-dropping sequences. The lengthy section of the movie set in the Burj Khalifa, the tallest building in the world, is absolutely riveting, in part because the stakes always seem so high. Everything goes wrong for these guys, whether its sabotage or just plain bad luck. The rope&#8217;s too short, the machine broke, a sandstorm&#8217;s coming, the message wouldn&#8217;t even self-destruct. The odds are stacked against them, and more often then not, they fail. It makes this movie stand out amongst all the CG perfection we&#8217;re used to seeing in modern action films.</p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Mission-Impossible-Ghost-Protocol-BTS-mission-impossible-ghost-protocol-27184542-620-345.jpeg"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Mission-Impossible-Ghost-Protocol-BTS-mission-impossible-ghost-protocol-27184542-620-345-479x266.jpg" alt="" title="Mission-Impossible-Ghost-Protocol-BTS-mission-impossible-ghost-protocol-27184542-620-345" width="479" height="266" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-4810" /></a></p>
<p>But the movie&#8217;s not just action. A lot of time is spent on good old-fashioned <em>M:I</em> espionage. For every great fight and chase, there&#8217;s a bit of cloak and dagger fun leading up to it, or parallel to it. A scene where Cruise and Pegg try to sneak down a hallway will have all but the most morbidly obese audience members on the edge of their seats. Renner breaking into a computer in one scene is an exciting and fun homage to the most infamous scene from the first movie. <em>Ghost Protocol</em> is 133 minutes long, but it doesn&#8217;t feel like it.</p>
<p>However, this movie doesn&#8217;t live up to <em>M:I:III</em> in one aspect: it&#8217;s characters. That film did a great job fleshing out the returning cast as well as introducing some fun new characters and a terrific villain. Here, the character moments are a lot more flat, and our villain, while given one great scene to show how crazy he is, is otherwise left devoid of personality and charisma. Plus, him being a physical match for Tom Cruise is a little hard to buy.</p>
<p><em>Mission: Impossible &#8211; Ghost Protocol</em> is the best action movie to come out in 2011. I say that aware that most of my favorite movies from last year were action movies. It&#8217;s just a lot of fun, especially on a massive IMAX screen with a super hot teaser of <em>The Dark Knight Rises</em> in front of it. Who would have guessed it took an animation guy to bring the reality back to crazy action movies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4577</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Strap It On</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4574</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4574#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 11:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Saints Row: The Third It&#8217;s hard to do stupid smart. I know that, because Saints Row 2 did stupid stupidly. Saints Row: The Third does stupid in a way that would make idiot savants jealous. Yes, this is not my strongest opening to a review, but don&#8217;t let that deter you from engaging in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/srtt.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><em>Saints Row: The Third</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.5.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>It&#8217;s hard to do stupid smart. I know that, because <em>Saints Row 2</em> did stupid stupidly. <em>Saints Row: The Third</em> does stupid in a way that would make idiot savants jealous. Yes, this is not my strongest opening to a review, but don&#8217;t let that deter you from engaging in the bizarre, incredible fever dream that is this latest entry in an unlikely franchise.</p>
<p>The Third Street Saints are huge now. They&#8217;re media icons, the biggest celebrities in the world, with their own clothing line and everything. As the game opens, they decide to rob a bank &#8211; wearing masks of themselves &#8211; with an actor who is going to play them in a movie. The heist goes bad, then crazy. Without giving too much away, the Saints end up in the town of Stillwater, desperate to take over and take down the local gang who would dare stand up to them.</p>
<p>Doing so includes the most ridiculous list of activities I&#8217;ve seen in a <em>GTAIII</em>-style game like this. You&#8217;ll be flying hover bikes and shooting lazer guns in no time. Repeatable side missions include a murder gameshow and a &#8220;destroy everything with a tank&#8221; mode. One of the earliest story missions has you recruit a permanently auto-tuned pimp by rescuing him from a BDSM club and escaping on gimp-driven rickshaws. Yes, this is exactly the game you don&#8217;t want ending up in the hands of young children.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s crazy is that it all works. Every aspect of the gameplay is fun, even a weird wrestling match towards the end. Driving and gunplay are both totally acceptable, and become ridiculous as you upgrade your character. Volition address everything with the exact right amount of seriousness, and the story is definitely more of the short and sweet variety than the drawn out, <em>GTAIV</em>  style. Even your created character, who can be male or female and speak in seven different voices, somehow becomes identifiable and endearing. Sure, I just made my guy look like Samuel Jackson from <em>Pulp Fiction</em>, but when I changed him, it just felt wrong.</p>
<p>I really don&#8217;t want to write too much about <em>Saints Row: The Third</em>. If you thought something like <em>GTA: San Andreas</em> was fun, but too restrained, check this shit out. If you&#8217;re still on the fence, let me just tell you one more thing: Burt Reynolds is in here. After a certain point, you can call him up and he&#8217;ll come and hang out with you. Any time you want. Case closed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4574</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 10 Video Games of 2011</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4517</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4517#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 06:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Ten]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How much do you like the number three? 2011 was a weird year for video games because, well, usually we&#8217;d have new consoles by now. The Xbox 360 turned six in November. The first Xbox was only four when it was replaced by the 360. This unnatural long life meant that a lot of franchises [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/lanoire.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><p>How much do you like the number three? 2011 was a weird year for video games because, well, usually we&#8217;d have new consoles by now. The Xbox 360 turned six in November. The first Xbox was only four when it was replaced by the 360. This unnatural long life meant that a lot of franchises that started this generation are putting out the final parts of trilogies that just wouldn&#8217;t have happened in generations before. In fact, only one game on my list isn&#8217;t a sequel, and I think that speaks more to the state of the industry than my taste. Maybe not.</p>
<p><span id="more-4517"></span></p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;">10. <em>Pokemon: White Version</em></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-G2tvkSJ8JuQ/TcHdaECOXiI/AAAAAAAABBs/6sio6KTt8us/s1600/White_box_EN-US.png"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-2523" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-G2tvkSJ8JuQ/TcHdaECOXiI/AAAAAAAABBs/6sio6KTt8us/s1600/White_box_EN-US.png" alt="" width="150" /></a>Look, the number ten spot is always the wild card. I could have put lots of things here. Maybe you were looking for a little <em>L.A. Noire</em>? Or how about some <em>Renegade Ops</em>, since it&#8217;s basically the <em>Fast Five</em> of last year&#8217;s games? Maybe some <em>Dead Space 2</em>? Too bad, because while lots of games are ostensibly better than the so-called reinvention of the Pokemon franchise, the fact of the matter is I spent a solid three weeks putting together the ultimate team. And while I may not have caught them all, I still had a pretty good time. I was also a senior in college at the time.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;">9. <em>Gears of War 3</em></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=2523" rel="attachment wp-att-2523"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-2523" title="Gears_of_War_3_box_artwork" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Gears_of_War_3_box_artwork-235x300.png" alt="" width="150" /></a>I&#8217;m a bit surprised how much I ended up enjoying the bro-tacious conclusion to the <em>Gears of War</em> trilogy. The story to this series has never really hooked me, especially since it always seemed like a good chunk of the plot existed outside of the actual game. Here, to borrow a phrase from the <em>Bad Boys</em> series, shit gets real. The Cole Train shows some depth, Dom&#8217;s depression plays out as over-the-top melodramatic as it could, and Marcus drives the story to an ending that actually ends most of the plotlines. Combine that with arguably the most complete multiplayer suite in gaming, and you&#8217;ve got quite the justification for $60.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;">8. <em>Bastion</em></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4542" rel="attachment wp-att-4542"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-4542" title="Bastion_Boxart" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Bastion_Boxart-150x179.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="179" /></a>One of my favorite video game journalists became a developer a few years ago, then broke out with a five other people and started a small studio, perhaps ironically called Supergiant Games. Their first game, <em>Bastion</em>, is a triumph. It&#8217;s a game that does everything it sets out to do, some of which had never been done before. I haven&#8217;t reviewed the game yet, so let me just say that if you want a unique approach to interactive storytelling combined with extra-tight RPG action, <em>Bastion</em> is worthy of your consideration.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;">7. <em>Uncharted 3: Drake&#8217;s Deception</em></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4539" rel="attachment wp-att-4539"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-4539" title="Uncharted_3_Boxart" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Uncharted_3_Boxart.jpeg" alt="" width="150" /></a>A lot of criticism was aimed at <em>Uncharted 3</em> after its release. Some complained about the floaty influence of auto-aim in the singleplayer mode. Some complained about a few of the shooting sections&#8217; level layout. But mostly, people complained that the game didn&#8217;t blow them away like <em>Uncharted 2</em> did. Yeah, but that&#8217;s because <em>Among Thieves</em> was a landmark game. <em>Drake&#8217;s Deception</em> does its best to meet that mark, and gets pretty close. There are some sequences in this game that are so cinematic and intense that I couldn&#8217;t compare any other game franchise to it. It&#8217;s hard to even think of a movie. No matter how you slice it, <em>Uncharted 3</em> is absolutely fantastic.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;">6. <em>Batman: Arkham City</em></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4543" rel="attachment wp-att-4543"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-4543" title="ArkhamCity" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/ArkhamCity-150x186.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="186" /></a>In part, <em>Arkham City</em> is helped out by the fact that Batman is easily my favorite super hero, and that I will take any opportunity to step into his shoes and bring justice to Gotham. 2011 was the year I watched all of <em>Justice League</em> and even played a bunch of <em>DC Universe Online</em>, but nothing scratched my Batman itch as well as this game. And, yes, it probably isn&#8217;t as good as <em>Arkham Asylum</em> was, but that&#8217;s the <em>Uncharted</em> problem all over again. The fact of the matter is, swooping around the city is real fun and no game is better at letting you pummel groups of thugs. It&#8217;s all a power trip, but I&#8217;m happy to be along for the ride.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;">5. <em>The Witcher 2: Assassins of Kings</em></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Dsl5eoavJU4/TlY9Bl-ObfI/AAAAAAAABGI/HP-vJMO4pl0/s1600/Witcher_2_cover.jpeg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-2523" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Dsl5eoavJU4/TlY9Bl-ObfI/AAAAAAAABGI/HP-vJMO4pl0/s1600/Witcher_2_cover.jpeg" alt="" width="150" /></a>It seems that 2011 was the year I got into RPG franchises that I previously found impenetrable, but we&#8217;ll get more into that later. What I will say is that <em>The Witcher 2</em> is a stunning game that tells a great story. In so many games, choice is so simplified; it&#8217;s really refreshing that the world of <em>The Witcher</em> is so messed up and the ramifications of your decisions so hard to predict. At one point, you choose to follow one of two people, both of whom are hard to sympathize with, and that determines the entirety of the second and third acts. It&#8217;s a whole other game! Awesome. Way to go, you Polish guys.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;">4. <em>Saints Row: The Third</em></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4548" rel="attachment wp-att-4548"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-4548" title="Saints_Row_The_Third_box_art" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Saints_Row_The_Third_box_art-150x189.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="189" /></a>This is the crazy conclusion games like <em>Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas</em> and <em>Saints Row 2</em> where building to. The pretense and bullshit that weighs down all the other self-serious open world games is completely thrown out in favor of making a sandbox for players that is fun every second you&#8217;re in it. Lazer guns, VTOLs, permanently auto-tuned pimps, Burt Reynolds, zombies, wrestling, it&#8217;s all in <em>Saints Row: The Third</em>. Seriously, if you thought <em>Grand Theft Auto IV</em> was too serious and long, or if you, I don&#8217;t know, like having fun, you should probably play this.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;">3. <em>Portal 2</em></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Qc3N6sbk7O0/TbHdo5MnIdI/AAAAAAAABBM/UHeKSh5npRs/s1600/Portal2cover.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-2523" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Qc3N6sbk7O0/TbHdo5MnIdI/AAAAAAAABBM/UHeKSh5npRs/s1600/Portal2cover.jpg" alt="" width="150" /></a>If you had to make a sequel to <em>Portal</em>, how would you do it? If you had asked me a while ago, I would have replied, no, I wouldn&#8217;t do it; it&#8217;s impossible, there&#8217;s no way it could be good. And yet, here we are. Valve pulled it off, again. <em>Portal 2</em> is longer, funnier and more rewarding than the original game. It&#8217;s pitch perfect, right up to it&#8217;s incredible final act. Comedy is so hard to do in games, but this one really nails it. Of course, it&#8217;s propelled by some amazing performances, but so was <em>L.A. Noire</em> and I don&#8217;t see that game on this list. They even managed to tack on multiplayer which totally worked and was surprisingly fun.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;">2. <em>The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim</em></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4549" rel="attachment wp-att-4549"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-4549" title="The_Elder_Scrolls_V_Skyrim_cover" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/The_Elder_Scrolls_V_Skyrim_cover-150x189.png" alt="" width="150" height="189" /></a>I never liked a Bethesda game. Not one. Couldn&#8217;t get into them. <em>Skyrim</em> changed that. It changed that by doing the same thing Bethesda has always done, just better. A lot better. Exploring the seemingly endless expanse of Skyrim is one of the joys only this medium can bring into a person&#8217;s life. It&#8217;s not even that any one thing specifically was improved. There&#8217;s an intangible quality to <em>Skyrim</em> that helps it transcend its status as a hardcore RPG into a mainstream hit. I mean, as I write this, I&#8217;m listening to Alex play the game with his friends. That&#8217;s crazy! This game is supposed to be as nerdy as it gets!</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;">1. <em>Star Wars: The Old Republic</em></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4550" rel="attachment wp-att-4550"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-4550" title="Star_Wars-_The_Old_Republic_cover" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Star_Wars-_The_Old_Republic_cover-150x211.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="211" /></a>So, you could make the case that <em>SW:TOR</em> came out so late in the year it shouldn&#8217;t count. But then I think those same people would argue it&#8217;s a 2011 game when the best of 2012 lists came around. So I&#8217;m counting it this year, because, you know what? This is basically my dream game. Take the addictive, never-ending gameplay of <em>World of Warcraft</em>, set it in the <em>Star Wars</em> universe and give it a Bioware story. Sure, the combat and questing might not be groundbreaking for MMOs, but the story definitely is. This is an amazing, one-of-a-kind production that deserves to put an end to <em>WoW</em>&#8216;s reign. By new year&#8217;s eve, I bet I had played this as much as any other game in 2011.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4517</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sean&#8217;s Top 10 Albums of 2011</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4481</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4481#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 01:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Ten]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wasn&#8217;t as engaged with music in 2011 as I have been the past few years. Without all the busywork of being a student, the time I spent listening to music declined. So I was a bit surprised to see that I had over 50 albums to choose from for my list. More surprising is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/coldplay.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><p>I wasn&#8217;t as engaged with music in 2011 as I have been the past few years. Without all the busywork of being a student, the time I spent listening to music declined. So I was a bit surprised to see that I had over 50 albums to choose from for my list. More surprising is that a number of my favorite bands released albums that didn&#8217;t even crack the list. No Radiohead! No My Morning Jacket! What a brave new world we&#8217;re living in.</p>
<p>Normally, this is where I&#8217;d list honorable mentions, but there are way too many for it to be worth a damn. It doesn&#8217;t help that I didn&#8217;t hear a few of the year&#8217;s greatest albums until they started popping up on other peoples&#8217; best of lists, and as such haven&#8217;t given them the time they deserve.</p>
<p>With that depressing disclaimer out of the way, let&#8217;s get on with it.</p>
<p><span id="more-4481"></span></p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;">10. TV on the Radio &#8211; <em>Nine Types of Light</em></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4456" rel="attachment wp-att-4456"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-4456" title="tv-on-the-radio-nine-types-of-light" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/tv-on-the-radio-nine-types-of-light-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Like I said when I reviewed <em>Nine Types of Light</em> last April, this album is kind of a departure and kind of exactly the same thing TV on the Radiohead has always done. Woah, that TV on the Radiohead typo sounds like a pretty good idea. Someone tell all those guys wasting all their time on dubstep remixes of the wrong music to start mashing up TV on the Radio and Radiohead. Hold on, let me search on YouTube. Yeah, I&#8217;m not seeing anything. Anyway&#8230; <em>Nine Types of Light</em>. Hmn. Kind of lost my train of thought. Did you know I bought this on iTunes and it came with a few bonus remixes of &#8220;Will Do&#8221;? It&#8217;s true. I wouldn&#8217;t lie about something like that. Nothing to gain, everything to lose.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;">9. Low &#8211; <em>C&#8217;mon</em></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4495" rel="attachment wp-att-4495"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-4495" title="Low" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Low-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>You listen to this shit? No? C&#8217;mon, man. C&#8217;mon. Come on! Damn it, I thought that gimmick would last longer. I guess I should write something about Low, since as far as I can recall, this is the first time they&#8217;ve been mentioned on the blog. Well, they&#8217;ve been around since the 1990s and this is the first album by them I&#8217;ve actually listened to. It sounds like a lot of critics that actually know the band&#8217;s history have lukewarm feelings for <em>C&#8217;mon</em>, but for a newcomer like myself, it sounds pretty great. Not that exciting or upbeat, but plenty lush and absorbing, if you know what I mean.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;">8. Telekinesis &#8211; <em>12 Desperate Straight Lines</em></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4496" rel="attachment wp-att-4496"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-4496" title="tk" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/tk-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Hey look, a local artist. Telekinesis is a power pop band with a slick-ass sound. <em>12 Desperate Straight Lines</em> is 12 tracks that deserve to be celebrated the way Chinese people do when they hear Americans raised the United States&#8217; national debt ceiling. Remember that whole debt ceiling debacle? Some people were really freaking out, they genuinely thought the economy, and by extension, the country, was on the brink of total destruction. Just imagine what horrible surprises 2012 could have in store for us! We&#8217;re going to have to fuck with the debt ceiling again, you know. Just like the Mayans predicted.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;">7. Cut Copy &#8211; <em>Zonoscope</em></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4496" rel="attachment wp-att-4496"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-4496" title="tk" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-GzgZSkQw_Zw/TVch0E-OMnI/AAAAAAAAB7k/G5EVTvi6E7I/s1600/Zonoscope.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>If there was one song I identified 2011 with, it would be would be &#8220;Party Rock Anthem&#8221; by hit uncle-nephew duo LMFAO. If there was another song, it would be the <em>Homeland</em>-endorsed &#8220;Pumped Up Kicks&#8221; by Foster the People. But if there was a third song, it would be &#8220;Need You Know&#8221; off <em>Zonoscope</em> by Cut Copy. Why, even now, I can listen to it and think fondly to that time my friend ran into Subway while I went through the Carl&#8217;s Jr. drive thru in McMinnville. Good times. Also, I still don&#8217;t know what the deal with Mick Jagger moves is.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;">6. Destroyer &#8211; <em>Kaputt</em></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4497" rel="attachment wp-att-4497"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-4497" title="2011Kaputt" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/2011Kaputt-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Let me tell you man, this album is casual. Casual as hell. Damn near soothing. It&#8217;s so cool. Out of all the albums on my list, this is probably the one I would most recommend everyone listen to, even though it wasn&#8217;t my favorite of the year. It&#8217;s just so unique, at least among the music I tend to listen to. Sort of disco-esque, I guess? Lots of horns and sax. Tight beats, funky guitars. Synthesizers. I don&#8217;t know, I&#8217;m not a musician. I know the name makes it seem like a Swedish death metal band, but it&#8217;s not!</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;">5. M83 &#8211; <em>Hurry Up, We&#8217;re Dreaming</em></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4498" rel="attachment wp-att-4498"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-4498" title="M83-Hurry-Up-Were-Dreaming" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/M83-Hurry-Up-Were-Dreaming-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>When <em>Hurry Up, We&#8217;re Dreaming</em> came out, I listened to the first few tracks, liked them, then moved on. I saw that M83 had put out a really long album, and I simply wasn&#8217;t trying. But, a few days ago, when I decided I needed to listen to it all the way through, I realized I really, really liked this album. Yes, it is over an hour. Yes, it is way too self-serious, going as far as to include a little girl talking about how great it would be to become a frog (no little girl would actually say this). But this is basically what the kind of music I want to listen to sounds like. For some reason, there being a lot of it seemed like a bad thing in October. It seems pretty great right now.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;">4. Wye Oak &#8211; <em>Civilian</em></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4499" rel="attachment wp-att-4499"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-4499" title="Wye_Oak_-_Civilian_album_cover" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Wye_Oak_-_Civilian_album_cover-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Unlike M83, Wye Oak had completely flown under my radar. When I finally did listen to them in early-mid December, and I saw that <em>Civilian</em> had come out March, I was like, &#8220;What the hell everybody? Why didn&#8217;t anyone tell me about this.&#8221; Then I mentioned it to Colin and he was all, &#8220;I&#8217;m not that into it.&#8221; And I was like, &#8220;Fair enough.&#8221; But secretly, in my brain, I was thinking about how I wish I had been listening to <em>Civilian</em> instead of whatever Colin was talking about. Screw you Black Keys, Wye Oak is my two-person band of the year.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;">3. Washed Out &#8211; <em>Within and Without</em></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3098" rel="attachment wp-att-3098"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-3098" title="Print" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Washed_out-within_and_without-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>I remember listening to <em>Within and Without</em> after dropping my brother off at the airport. According to iTunes, that&#8217;s the last time I listened to the album. So, how fitting that I&#8217;m listening to it now, on a day when I had to go pick him up from the airport at an hour so early that now I&#8217;m struggling to spell airport and not make a run-on sentence. I know John is really good at hearing songs on the radio and turning them into albums he enjoys, but I&#8217;ve never had a knack for it. So I&#8217;m kind of proud that I heard Washed Out on KEXP one day this summer and managed to remember him long enough to look him up. And chillwave still is an awesome name for a genre.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;">2. The Antlers &#8211; <em>Burst Apart</em></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3108" rel="attachment wp-att-3108"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-3108" title="StrangeMercy" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-CKJwqtZoSmk/Te9fUpKuJaI/AAAAAAAABB0/vk_bTlQpx0M/s1600/antlers-burst-apart1.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>I don&#8217;t know guys, I think the Antlers are pretty good. If you remember my review, the popularly titled <a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?p=911">Antlers in My Pantlers</a>, I explained that <em>Burst Apart</em> bust apart my appreciation for the new Fleet Foxes album by being so good I basically forgot about them. That&#8217;s Antlers power, baby. This album was the only one I was listening to for a few weeks. That just doesn&#8217;t happen to me that often. Now, sure, it&#8217;s been a few months since I last listened to it, but I&#8217;m pretty sure I still like it. I mean, what do you want me to do, listen to it again? OK. You first.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;">1. St. Vincent &#8211; <em>Strange Mercy</em></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3108" rel="attachment wp-att-3108"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-3108" title="StrangeMercy" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/StrangeMercy-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>What the hell happened at the end of that Antlers thing? Oh well, sleep deprivation. The last St. Vincent album, a.k.a. the only other one I listened to, opened strong but finished less so. <em>Strange Mercy</em> is a work of genius that makes me happy I have the power of hearing. Each of its 11 tracks has something going for it. Here, I&#8217;ll pick one randomly. I got the last song on the album, &#8220;Year of the Tiger.&#8221; Well, that&#8217;s an interesting one. She talks about a lot of things, but &#8220;Oh America, can I owe you one&#8221; is the recurring line that sticks with me. Oh St. Vincent, you don&#8217;t owe me a thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4481</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Colin&#8217;s Top 10 Albums of 2011</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4424</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4424#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 01:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Ten]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I feel like I did a lot of complaining on this blog about how there were so few exciting music releases this year, but in the end I&#8217;m pretty satisfied with 2011&#8242;s music as a whole.  I seem to be listening to more and more new music each year, and this year I ended up [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel like I did a lot of complaining on this blog about how there were so few exciting music releases this year, but in the end I&#8217;m pretty satisfied with 2011&#8242;s music as a whole.  I seem to be listening to more and more new music each year, and this year I ended up listening to 33 albums, though of course SOPA might have a considerable influence on my ability to freely download that new indie band that all the nerds on the internet are talking about.  Anyways, let&#8217;s get on with this thing.</p>
<p><span id="more-4424"></span></p>
<p><strong>Honorable Mentions:</strong><br />
Kurt Vile &#8211; <em>Smoke Ring For My Halo</em><br />
The War On Drugs &#8211; <em>Slave Ambient</em><br />
Radiohead &#8211; <em>The King Of Limbs</em></p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 24px;">10. Cults - </span></span><em><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 24px;">Cults</span></span></em></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4448" rel="attachment wp-att-4448"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-4448" title="cults" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/cults-300x300.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="200" /></a>I&#8217;m just a sucker for music like this.  With their &#8217;60s girl group sound, Cults doesn&#8217;t do a whole a lot to set themselves apart from a lot of similarly-minded indie pop bands, well except for the fact that their songs are just really damn catchy.  Sure, it&#8217;s entirely possible that I&#8217;ll have completely forgotten about this album a year from now, but it provided me with some first rate pick me up music throughout the year, and for that I&#8217;m grateful.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 24px;">9. Lykke Li - </span></span><em><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 24px;">Wounded Rhymes</span></span></em></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4451" rel="attachment wp-att-4451"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-4451" title="Lykke_Li_Wounded_Rhymes_cover" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Lykke_Li_Wounded_Rhymes_cover-300x300.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="200" /></a>As far as I remember, this was the first album to come out this year that really grabbed me.  This took me a little bit by surprise since it&#8217;s not typically the kind of thing that I find myself listening to, but I suppose Lykke Li&#8217;s overt popiness is matched equally by her penchant for exploring all sorts of different sounds and genres, and that&#8217;s cool I guess.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 24px;">8. Raphael Saadiq - </span></span><em><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 24px;">Stone Rollin&#8217;</span></span></em></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4452" rel="attachment wp-att-4452"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-4452" title="raphael-saadiq-stone-rollin-cover" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/raphael-saadiq-stone-rollin-cover-300x300.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="200" /></a>There are a lot of pop singers nowadays that seem to draw heavily from the soulful sounds of &#8217;60s R&amp;B, so I&#8217;m not exactly sure what jumped out at me about <em>Stone Rollin&#8217;</em>.  I guess the thing about Raphael Saadiq is the undeniable energy behind his songs.  I mean you don&#8217;t hear many modern R&amp;B artists trying to infuse their music with the kind of raw garage rock swagger that you hear on tracks like &#8220;Heart Attack&#8221; and &#8220;Over You&#8221;.  And yet Saadiq shows himself equally able to put new delightful spins on the tried and true soul ballad formula as well.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 24px;">7. St. Vincent &#8211; </span></span><em><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 24px;">Strange Mercy</span></span></em></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4454" rel="attachment wp-att-4454"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-4454" title="St.-Vincent-Strange-Mercy-Music-Video" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/St.-Vincent-Strange-Mercy-Music-Video-300x263.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="200" /></a>When this album initially came out, my immediate reaction was &#8220;Whoah, this is weird, therefore I&#8217;m not gonna even give it a shot.&#8221;  I guess it&#8217;s pretty sad that I&#8217;m at a point in my life where I consciously avoid art that&#8217;s challenging in any way, but thankfully I eventually decided to give <em>Strange Mercy</em> the shot it deserved.  Sure, it is weird and filled with all sorts of messy emotions, but it&#8217;s also full of beauty and grandeur, and somehow Annie Clark pulls off that uneasy balance in a way that few others could.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 24px;">6. Wilco - </span></span><em><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 24px;">The Whole Love</span></span></em></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4455" rel="attachment wp-att-4455"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-4455" title="wilco-the-whole-love" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/wilco-the-whole-love-300x300.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="200" /></a>Of all the established artists that released albums this year, Wilco was not one of the ones I was expecting to blow me away, which I suppose accounts for the fact that I severely underestimated <em>The Whole Love</em> until much later in the year.  For really the first time since <em>Yankee Hotel Foxtrot</em>, you see Jeff Tweedy and co. successfully fusing their more experimental and abrasive tendencies with the classicist country rock of their last few albums.  In some ways I think you could even say that this is the album that Wilco have been building towards with this more consistent line-up.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 24px;">5. TV On The Radio - </span></span><em><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 24px;">Nine Types Of Light</span></span></em></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4456" rel="attachment wp-att-4456"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-4456" title="tv-on-the-radio-nine-types-of-light" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/tv-on-the-radio-nine-types-of-light-300x300.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="200" /></a>So this is the album where TVOTR toned it down a bit and laid down some sensuous lovey-dovey songs.  It makes for an album that doesn&#8217;t have the urgency or timeliness of their last two releases, but that&#8217;s perfectly fine with me when these guys are perfectly adept at making lovely R&amp;B-tinged ballads like the ones featured on <em>Nine Types Of Light</em>.  Plus there are still songs like &#8220;New Cannonball Run&#8221; and &#8220;Caffeinated Consciousness&#8221;, which capture how undeniably badass this band is still capable of sounding.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 24px;">4. Wild Flag &#8211; </span></span><em><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 24px;">Wild Flag</span></span></em></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4459" rel="attachment wp-att-4459"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-4459" title="wild-flag-album-cover" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/wild-flag-album-cover-300x300.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="200" /></a>You may or may not have noticed, but I tend to gravitate more towards high-energy guitar based music than really anything else.  <em>Wild Flag</em> was easily my favorite guitar record for rocking this year away, which is a bit unexpected considering it came from a bunch of chicks in their late thirties.  But what can I say, these ladies have the chops and the unabashed energy to hang with any of their younger indie rock peers.  Here&#8217;s to hoping they&#8217;re just getting started with this infectious debut.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 24px;">3. Girls &#8211; </span></span><em><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 24px;">Father, Son, Holy Ghost</span></span></em></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4460" rel="attachment wp-att-4460"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-4460" title="GIRLS-Father-Son-Holy-Ghost" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/GIRLS-Father-Son-Holy-Ghost-300x300.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="200" /></a>In the three and a half years I spent in San Francisco, Girls is probably the only SF band I can recall getting heavily into, so I suppose for that I&#8217;ll always associate Girls&#8217; first album as well as <em>Father, Son, Holy Ghost</em> with that city.  It&#8217;s kind of incredible how much musical ground Girls has already covered considering they&#8217;ve only been around for a few years now.  <em>Father, Son, Holy Ghost</em> sees the band covering pretty much every genre that was remotely relevant during the &#8217;60s and &#8217;70s, and it&#8217;ll be fun to see what they continue to do with their distinctly retro style.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 24px;">2. Bon Iver - </span></span><em><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 24px;">Bon Iver</span></span></em></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4461" rel="attachment wp-att-4461"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-4461" title="bon-iver-album-cover-610x610-592" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/bon-iver-album-cover-610x610-592-300x300.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="200" /></a>When I wrote my original review of Bon Iver&#8217;s sophomore album, I didn&#8217;t really have much to say about it other than the fact that it&#8217;s just a really beautiful album.  Six months later that&#8217;s still about all I can say about it, as it&#8217;s beauty just seemed to become more welcome and inviting as the months went by and the weather started to get colder.  It&#8217;s quite possible that this might be the most widely acclaimed album of the year, though I can&#8217;t be sure.  Either way it&#8217;s plenty deserving of it&#8217;s praise and I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s something I&#8217;ll keep returning to in these early days of 2012.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 24px;">1. Fleet Foxes - </span></span><em><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 24px;">Helplessness Blues</span></span></em></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4462" rel="attachment wp-att-4462"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-4462" title="helplessnessblues" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/helplessnessblues-300x300.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="200" /></a>And here&#8217;s another album that also caught my ear because of it&#8217;s profound beauty, albeit in a more traditional and rustic manner.  You could argue that Fleet Foxes is slowly just becoming a Robin Pecknold solo project, but it&#8217;s that personal quality that Pecknold infuses <em>Helplessness Blues</em> with that really resonated with me, and I can&#8217;t really complain about anything he&#8217;s doing here.  I suppose It&#8217;s a little weird that I fell so hard for this album, considering the first Fleet Foxes album never quite hooked me in the way it did for most people, but I&#8217;ve come to love both albums and hope these guys can just keep doing what they&#8217;re doing, &#8217;cause it&#8217;s pretty great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4424</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John&#8217;s Top 10 Albums of 2011</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4362</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4362#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 00:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Ten]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Musically speaking 2011 was a peculiar year for myself as most of the albums I liked were released in such a short period of time. I was basically good up until June and then uninterested in most of everything I heard afterwards. As usual I delved into the pool of new artists proclaimed good by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Musically speaking 2011 was a peculiar year for myself as most of the albums I liked were released in such a short period of time. I was basically good up until June and then uninterested in most of everything I heard afterwards. As usual I delved into the pool of new artists proclaimed good by various magazines near the end of year but I didn&#8217;t discover much that that really struck a chord with me (also as usual). Overall I have mixed feelings about 2011 but I&#8217;m still happy with this list, enjoy.</p>
<p><span id="more-4362"></span></p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">10. The Black Keys &#8211; <em>El Camino</em></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4216" rel="attachment wp-att-4216"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-4216" title="Black-Keys-El-Camino" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Black-Keys-El-Camino1-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="200" /></a><em>The Black Keys</em> just barely nab a spot for continuing to evolve and move forward with their most ambitious album to date. I still think I need some more time to let it permeate in my brain and I&#8217;d be lying if I said I haven&#8217;t been distracted by their ever increasing popularity. What I do know about <em>El Camino</em> is that it&#8217;s production and instrumentation is big, beautiful, and calls back to some of the best retro sounds of the 60s and 70s.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">9. Foster the People &#8211; <em>Torches</em></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4380" rel="attachment wp-att-4380"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-4380" title="e3c3d64f270192ce498a5a41e34461b9206303b0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/e3c3d64f270192ce498a5a41e34461b9206303b0-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="200" /></a>Watching bands rise to the mainstream always carries a hint of sadness for myself so I was hesitant about getting into <em>Foster</em> after they hit it big with the catchy &#8220;Pumped up Kicks&#8221;. A few songs steer towards a kind of pop that isn&#8217;t necessarily &#8220;My Thang&#8221; but for the most part there&#8217;s some very melodic material here. I only hope the mainstream attention and performances with <em>Kenny G</em> on SNL doesn&#8217;t get to their heads.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">8. The Strokes &#8211; <em>Angles</em></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4387" rel="attachment wp-att-4387"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-4387" title="The-Strokes-Angles" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/The-Strokes-Angles-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="200" /></a>I feel like there was so much excitement for this record and then when it finally did get released all that just fizzled out. I don&#8217;t know what the critics consensus was but I haven&#8217;t seen it on any end-of-the-year lists. Whatever the matter I&#8217;m still of the opinion that this is some of the group&#8217;s best material in awhile. Though it seems clear that <em>The Strokes</em> will never again reach the levels of <em>Is This It?</em> it&#8217;s still interesting to see how they continue to tweak their trademark sound. <em>Angles</em> has a bit of an 80s vibe to it as the band delivers a sound that&#8217;s expansive and yet tighter than ever. The songs here are more complex than what we&#8217;ve heard in the past but still catchy, I&#8217;m glad they&#8217;re back.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">7. Radiohead &#8211; <em>The King of Limbs</em></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4390" rel="attachment wp-att-4390"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-4390" title="The_king_of_limbs" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/The_king_of_limbs-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="200" /></a>As usual <em>Radiohead</em> succeeds at tapping into the unusual with the unpredictable genre mish mash that is <em>The King of Limbs</em>. Though tinkering around with laptops and tape loops seem to be more prevalent than ever I wouldn&#8217;t necessarily call this an electronic album, it&#8217;s just <em>Radiohead</em>. The songs are all distinctive in their own quirky ways, most notably the lead single &#8220;Lotus Flower&#8221; that was only made better with it&#8217;s music video that has become one of the weirdest memes I&#8217;ve ever seen. I still tend to gravitate towards the more guitar band based <em>Radiohead</em> on tracks like &#8220;Morning Mr. Magpie&#8221; and my favorite odd ball &#8220;Little By Little&#8221; but even those seem to inhabit their own little worlds.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">6. Peter Bjorn and John &#8211; <em>Gimme Some</em></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4395" rel="attachment wp-att-4395"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-4395" title="Peter-Bjorn-and-John" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Peter-Bjorn-and-John-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="200" /></a><em>Peter Bjorn and John</em> have played with so many different sounds on their last couple of albums that it was a nice change of pace to see them go back to basics. I can&#8217;t imagine how they could of played most of the material on their last two albums live but now my mind can be put at ease with this very straightforward yet still very Peter Bjorn and John sounding rock album. This easily accessible collection of garage rockers goes down smooth with a mix of both punky and radio friendly tunes. &#8220;Second Chance&#8221; in particular is a standout for being the song that may have finally dethroned &#8220;Young Folks&#8221; as the group&#8217;s most successful and/or well known song. I&#8217;m always intrigued when these guys experiment with various genres and instruments but it&#8217;s nice to get an album like this every once in awhile too.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">5. Cage the Elephant &#8211; <em>Thank You Happy Birthday</em></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4396" rel="attachment wp-att-4396"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-4396" title="cage-the-elephant-thank-you-happy-birthday-1024x1024" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/cage-the-elephant-thank-you-happy-birthday-1024x1024-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="200" /></a>Here&#8217;s a surprise, a band I previously had absolutely no interest in releases an album I really like. No longer the poor man&#8217;s Jack White sounding band I previously dismissed them as. <em>Cage the Elephant</em> has evolved into more of <em>Pixies/Punk</em> inspired band on their second album and I welcome the change. <em>Thank You Happy Birthday</em> has a gritty garage rock feel with an exciting energy that can only come from a young band. &#8220;Aberdeen&#8221; is still my favorite song of 2011 and has not lost any of it&#8217;s impact even after multiple listenings. There&#8217;s just something about that particular song that I find very emotionally affecting and not just because of it&#8217;s melancholy music video featuring a sad claymation dragon. <em>Cage</em> has earned my respect let&#8217;s just see if they can hold on to it with whatever direction they go in next.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">4. The Decemberists &#8211; <em>The King is Dead</em></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4401" rel="attachment wp-att-4401"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-4401" title="The_Decemberists_-_The_King_Is_Dead" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/The_Decemberists_-_The_King_Is_Dead-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="200" /></a>If there is one album on this list that I&#8217;d recommend as a must listen right at this moment it would be this one, which wouldn&#8217;t be an easy task. <em>The King is Dead</em> isn&#8217;t the most accessible album and <em>The Decemberists</em> aren&#8217;t the most exciting group but there&#8217;s so much passion here. <em>The Decemberists</em> have such a beautiful Indie Folk style that&#8217;s only been made better on their sixth album with some welcomed hints of bluegrass. There&#8217;s also accordions, banjos, harmonicas, cellos, all played to a tee by this talented group of multi-instrumentalists. Of course everyone has their role but it&#8217;s still frontman Colin Meloy with his quavering vocals and clever lyrical wordplay that draws the most attention. Guest musician Gillian Welch adds some well blended backing vocals on seven of the album&#8217;s ten tracks and <em>R.E.M&#8217;s</em> Peter Buck stops by for some pitch perfect guitar and mandolin performances, including the very <em>R.E.M.</em> sounding single &#8220;Down By the Water&#8221;. In terms of folk music this album throws in the hole folky kitchen sink but never loses any of it&#8217;s sincerity, I wish I could rate it higher.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">3. Death Cab for Cutie &#8211; <em>Codes and Keys</em></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4402" rel="attachment wp-att-4402"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-4402" title="Death-Cab-For-Cutie-Codes-and-Keys-Album-Cover" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Death-Cab-For-Cutie-Codes-and-Keys-Album-Cover-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="200" /></a><em>Death Cab</em> has simply established a winning formula. Their signature sound is damn near irresistible to any fan of alternative rock and they&#8217;re yet to show any signs of diminishing creativity. <em>Codes and Keys</em> doesn&#8217;t give us much that we didn&#8217;t already hear on <em>Narrow Stairs</em>, keyboards being the exception, but it&#8217;s still effortlessly cool with an almost calming mood to it. &#8220;You Are a Tourist&#8221; is an immediate <em>Death Cab</em> classic and the title track may be my favorite <em>Death Cab</em> ballad ever conceived. We should be very proud of our boys from Bellingham.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">2. My Morning Jacket &#8211; <em>Circuital</em></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4403" rel="attachment wp-att-4403"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-4403" title="my-morning-jacket-circuital" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/my-morning-jacket-circuital-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="200" /></a>What I love about <em>MMJ</em> aside from the fact that they MF&#8217;N rock beyond all belief is how unpredictable they are. I&#8217;m still not sure what to make of <em>Circuital</em>. Stylistically it&#8217;s a little bit country, it&#8217;s a little bit rock and roll, and it&#8217;s a little bit space arena rock. James is still an amazingly unique rock figure but one should not overlook the amazingly proficient musicianship that continues to compliment his soaring vocals. <em>MMJ</em> sounds like no one else and continues to fearlessly explore new rock waters with each release. It&#8217;s funny that the albums I really like are usually the ones I have the least to say about I suppose the music just speaks for itself.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">1. Bright Eyes &#8211; <em>The People&#8217;s Key</em></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4369" rel="attachment wp-att-4369"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-4369" title="bright-eyes-the-peoples-key1" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/bright-eyes-the-peoples-key1-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="200" /></a>From the opening Shaman-like monologue by Denny Brewer I knew this would be an album that would stay with me. Each song is its own little story tied together by an eclectic collection of instruments and talented people. This was my introduction to <em>Bright Eyes</em> and right away I could see why so many before me have been drawn to the powerful songwriting and presence of Connor Oberst. Though all intellectual themes and messages aside this also happens to be a great rock record. The songs on <em>The People&#8217;s Key</em> range from somber and brooding to perfectly pleasing upbeat pop. It&#8217;s amazing how well this album gels together considering how much is really going on and hey, it taught me all about secret-lizard-people, thanks <em>Bright Eyes</em> and thank you 2011.</p>
<p><strong>Honorable Mention</strong><br />
Yuck &#8211; Yuck<br />
Metronomy &#8211; The English Riviera<br />
Wilco &#8211; The Whole Love</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4362</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Impressions of the Old Republic</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4289</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4289#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 02:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s kind of silly to review an MMO, but I have put quite some time into Star Wars: The Old Republic, and I&#8217;d like to talk about it. For the record, I played in the two big beta weekends and have a level 35 bounty hunter on the live servers, which means I&#8217;ve completed the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/swtor.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><p>It&#8217;s kind of silly to review an MMO, but I have put quite some time into <em>Star Wars: The Old Republic</em>, and I&#8217;d like to talk about it. For the record, I played in the two big beta weekends and have a level 35 bounty hunter on the live servers, which means I&#8217;ve completed the first act.</p>
<p><span id="more-4289"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4347" rel="attachment wp-att-4347"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Screenshot_2011-12-31_17_36_06_285341-479x269.jpg" alt="" title="Screenshot_2011-12-31_17_36_06_285341" width="479" height="269" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-4347" /></a></p>
<p>Probably the most important question in regard to <em>SWTOR</em> is what kind of game it actually turned out to be. The marketing positioned it as both the next big Bioware RPG and the next big MMORPG, leaving many confused what to expect. Would it be<em> KOTOR 3</em>? <em>World of Warcraft</em> with lightsabers? <em>Star Wars: Galaxies</em> with quality? If I had to define <em>SWTOR</em> with an equation, I&#8217;d write it: <em>World of Warcraft</em> + Bioware storytelling + A sprinkling of <em>Star Wars</em> atmosphere.</p>
<p>A lot of the way this game plays came from <em>WoW</em>. The combat is the same hotkey-based style that it used, although I&#8217;d say it generally feels more lively here than it did in Azeroth. Quests are basically the same too, you talk to quest givers, run out to kill/collect things, return, rinse and repeat. Talent trees are lengthy and probably daunting to new players, what with all the jargon and math. But on a base level, this is <em>World of Warcraft</em> in space.</p>
<p>What makes this game better than <em>WoW</em>, at least so far, is Bioware. I leveled two characters to 85 before I quit <em>Cataclysm</em> and I could only tell you the most simple outline of <em>World of Warcraft</em>&#8216;s story. Because, except for cinematics and in-quest dialogue, I never paid attention to the content of quests. I could tell you everything that happened to my bounty hunter in <em>SWTOR</em>. The amount of voice acting in this game is unparalleled and it really pays off. Even though I&#8217;m doing basically the same things, it feels so much more meaningful when you have to hear people plead their case and can even yell back at them. The overarching class story is a great motivator too, much more than simply wanting to reach the level cap. And when I&#8217;m done with that, even the instances and PVP content has story content for me to enjoy. The conversation wheel is Bioware&#8217;s trademark, and it truly enhances this game.</p>
<p>But is this game <em>Star Wars</em> enough? This franchise means a lot to a lot of different people. Some people just like the original trilogy, some people like all the movies, some idiot kids only associate <em>Star Wars</em> with that cartoon. This game has to appeal to all of them. What <em>SWTOR </em>reminds me most of is <em>KOTOR</em>, in terms of atmosphere. It&#8217;s that classic fantasy storytelling set in space. Blasters sound like blasters, lightsabers do what they do, the Empire is basically run by Nazis and the Jedis are super strict drones. Every <em>Star Wars</em> trope is in here, even space combat is shoehorned in as a pretty, simple minigame. But, being set thousands of years before the movies, you won&#8217;t see any familiar characters, save from <em>KOTOR</em> holdovers. It makes sense for lore, it&#8217;s probably the only way a game like this could have ever been done, but it is weird being in a world of facsimiles of <em>Star Wars</em> characters.</p>
<p>My bounty hunter started on Hutta, the planet of Huts, looking to make a name for himself in the Great Hunt, essentials the Olympics for hired guns. I met a Hut just like Jabba, made an enemy like Boba Fett, took orders from a guy like Emperor Palpatine and even killed a guy like Qui-Gon Jinn (he tried to mind trick me, I was not having any of that). It was <em>Star Wars</em> and yet it wasn&#8217;t, it was a new story set in a new place with new people.</p>
<p>Of course, the reality of MMOs means that not everything can be as epic as the movies. I&#8217;ve spent a lot of time killing off random enemies of Imperial officers and delivering materials for anyone willing to pay. The minutiae of questing can slow your momentum and distract you from your story goals, especially if you&#8217;re on one of the less interesting planets. But I&#8217;d say most of the story is compelling enough to keep me playing and thinking about it when I&#8217;m not.</p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4348" rel="attachment wp-att-4348"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/ss_03_FULL-479x269.jpg" alt="" title="ss_03_FULL" width="479" height="269" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-4348" /></a></p>
<p>Story isn&#8217;t even the only great new feature this game brings to MMOs; let&#8217;s talk about the crew. In SWTOR, you are allowed to have a companion with you at all times. So, for example, my character always has Mako, the healer, with him. Having a permanent party member is huge, it means I basically have no downtime and I can even send her off to vendor useless items. It makes soloing content more fun and the way companions interact with the story makes them even more interesting. Every companion has a distinct personality and they will gain affection if they agree with your decisions. So, even though I&#8217;m Empire, my bounty hunter is a light side character because that&#8217;s what Mako likes, and I want her to like me. It&#8217;s very Bioware, but also pretty cool for an MMO.</p>
<p>Professions in <em>World of Warcraft</em> are supposed to be a way to make upgrades and money &#8211; what they really are is a boring grind. <em>SWTOR</em> totally alleviates that by making professions into &#8220;crew skills.&#8221; Essentially, at any time you can send your companion off on missions to level up your professions. They can craft gear and gather materials for you. It&#8217;s very handy. My character&#8217;s crew skills let him make armor and gather materials for that armor. While I&#8217;m out questing, I send my characters to get mats for me and make new armor when it&#8217;s available. They even keep working while I&#8217;m logged off. It&#8217;s a great system and makes something I never really enjoyed in <em>WOW</em> into a fantastic feature.</p>
<p>Everyone&#8217;s biggest complaint about <em>SWTOR</em> right now is the queues. I play on a fairly popular server, and I have had queues to log on lasting upwards of an hour, which is definitely not acceptable. But the game has only been out for a week, it&#8217;ll get better. In fact, over the past few days I haven&#8217;t really had a queuing problem, maybe they&#8217;ve already fixed it. Or maybe I&#8217;m just playing at the right times. Either way, it&#8217;s something to be aware of, but probably not something to keep you from playing the game.</p>
<p>Personally, I find the game&#8217;s Auction House UI really slow and lacking &#8211; that&#8217;s probably my chief complaint. It&#8217;s a pain to search, compare prices and sell a lot of stuff right now. The rest of the game&#8217;s UI is pretty good, and Bioware has said UI customization and mods are on the horizon.</p>
<p>Right now, at launch, I think <em>SWTOR</em> is a great game. I just hope the endgame is good and the game can continue to evolve like <em>WOW</em> has. It&#8217;s the best of the <em>World of Warcraft</em> tied to a story by my favorite gaming storytellers set in my favorite fictional universe. It&#8217;s sort of my dream game, which is another reason I&#8217;m glad I don&#8217;t have to review it. I&#8217;ve been waiting to visit the Old Republic for a long time, and now that I&#8217;m there, I won&#8217;t be leaving any time soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4289</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wyld Stallyn</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4337</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4337#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 02:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[War Horse There&#8217;s little Steven Spielberg hasn&#8217;t done in his long and varied career. He&#8217;s made movies about everything from aliens to dinosaurs to his many acclaimed projects centered around WWII, but it wasn&#8217;t until now that he finally decided to make a film about &#8220;The Great War&#8221;. Adapted from Michael Morpurgo&#8217;s 1982 children&#8217;s novel [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/war-horse-posterAU.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><em>War Horse</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>There&#8217;s little Steven Spielberg hasn&#8217;t done in his long and varied career. He&#8217;s made movies about everything from aliens to dinosaurs to his many acclaimed projects centered around WWII, but it wasn&#8217;t until now that he finally decided to make a film about &#8220;The Great War&#8221;. Adapted from Michael Morpurgo&#8217;s 1982 children&#8217;s novel which also became in 2007 became a popular stage play, <em>War Horse</em> is the story of Young Albert Narracott (Jeremy Irvine) and his close relationship with the horse he helped raise Joey. Set against the gritty backdrop of a WWI ravaged Europe we watch as Joey finds himself on both sides of the war, his own struggles, and of course all the colorful characters he encounters along the way.</p>
<p>From a glance the whole concpet sounds a little sappy and it doesn&#8217;t help that Spielberg as gifted a filmmaker as he is has often been criticized over the years for being overly sentimental. Naturally <em>War Horse</em> has it&#8217;s moments where you&#8217;re forced to feel something but for the most part it&#8217;s a very sincerely made film that&#8217;s hard not to like at least a little. Spielberg gets a lot of flack for his overly emotional filmmaking but whereas some have always seen it as his crutch or just a gimmick he uses to pull at our heartstrings I&#8217;ve always felt it was simply his style and a style that he still delivers better than anyone else. I&#8217;m not saying that Spielberg doesn&#8217;t misfire with this approach from time to time but usually he knows what people want to see and feel, it&#8217;s simply how he chooses to take us out of our natural world and into a world of cinematic escapism. I never thought I could care or feel anything about a horse protagonist but Spielberg is a natural storyteller and still accomplishes this with one of the best working teams in hollywood including; cinematographer Janusz Kaminski, editor Michael Kahn, and of course composer John Williams to name a few.</p>
<p><em>War Horse</em> isn&#8217;t your typical narrative being that it follows a silent protagonist merely trying to function in it&#8217;s environment rather than achieve any specific goal. Initially I felt this approach would have the effect of making the audiences feel unattached to the subject but the small relationship stories between Joey and the humans that makeup <em>War Horse</em> are surprisingly enjoyable. Perhaps my favorite portion of the film was the scenes that took place on the battlefield as I can&#8217;t really recall ever seeing a film about WWI that was this polished. Times like these almost made me wish I was just watching a film about people fighting in WWI, but I suppose this small taste of battle combined with the emotional story of a horse gave it a unique blend.</p>
<p>In the grand scheme of things <em>War Horse</em> isn&#8217;t one of Spielberg&#8217;s more memorable films and I&#8217;m not sure I agree with it being considered for awards season. Yet <em>War Horse</em> has heart and despite being a big budget hollywood film feels like a film that was still made with love and care and I think that tends to go far, Spielberg still has it.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4337</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sounds Of Silence</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4316</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4316#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 01:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Artist On the other end of the spectrum from Shame is the wonderfully light-hearted ode to good old-fashioned Hollywood filmmaking that is The Artist.  It was only about a month ago that Martin Scorsese released his own ode to the early days of cinema with Hugo, while French director Michel Hazanavicius takes his love for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/the-artist-poster.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><em><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 24px;">The Artist</span></span></em></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>On the other end of the spectrum from <em>Shame</em> is the wonderfully light-hearted ode to good old-fashioned Hollywood filmmaking that is <em>The Artist</em>.  It was only about a month ago that Martin Scorsese released his own ode to the early days of cinema with <em>Hugo</em>, while French director Michel Hazanavicius takes his love for silent cinema a step further with a full-on black &amp; white silent film.  However, I think Hazanavicius is slightly less interested in film history and more enthusiastic about the simple joys that exist in telling a classic love story with the kind of visually inventive  techniques that were encouraged before sound came into play.</p>
<p>Storywise, it&#8217;s a little hard not to draw parallels to <em>Singin&#8217; In The Rain</em>, as <em>The Artist</em> also centers around Hollywood&#8217;s transition from the star-driven silent films of the 1920&#8242;s into the talkies of the &#8217;30s.  The particular star it centers on is the fictional George Valentin, played with the utmost charm by Jean Darjudin.  Valentin finds his star-power quickly starting to dwindle in the wake of the talking pictures, while the young starlet Peppy Miller (Berenice Bejo), a onetime romantic aquaintance of Valentin, is seen rising in popularity.</p>
<p>Both Darjudin and Bejo are pretty fantastic, and display the kind of charisma and comedic timing that you&#8217;d think would be hard for modern actors to pull off, but somehow they fit into this archaic style of acting quite effortlessly.  And on top of that, you get to see veteran Hollywood actors like John Goodman and James Cromwell have a lot of fun with their roles as well.  Also, a lot of the cinematography takes a page out of <em>Citizen Kane,</em> by often using some striking visual symbolism that helps to give the film a little bit of thematic depth without seeming too indulgent.</p>
<p>With it&#8217;s crowd-pleasing optimism and undeniable appeal to cinephiles, it&#8217;s easy to see why this could be an awards-season favorite.  Sure, it&#8217;s a film that&#8217;s often light as a feather, but sometimes feel-good movies like this are just what the doctor ordered.  Also, I&#8217;m a little skeptical about how much audiences will really go for such a quaint nostalgia piece, but if there was ever a movie that could rope modern audiences into seeing a silent black &amp; white film, this&#8217;d be it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4316</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sexual Tyrannosaurus</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4312</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4312#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 00:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shame I guess I&#8217;ll take this time to finally get a couple of reviews out of the way, but I&#8217;ll probably be brief since I&#8217;m still feeling the affects of post-Christmas laziness.  Shame is a film that I wasn&#8217;t really intending to see since its reviews were a bit mixed, and the film&#8217;s tone and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/shame_poster1.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><em><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-large;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 24px;">Shame</span></span></em></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>I guess I&#8217;ll take this time to finally get a couple of reviews out of the way, but I&#8217;ll probably be brief since I&#8217;m still feeling the affects of post-Christmas laziness.  <em>Shame</em> is a film that I wasn&#8217;t really intending to see since its reviews were a bit mixed, and the film&#8217;s tone and subject matter weren&#8217;t exactly what I was looking for this holiday season.  Still, after sitting through director Steve McQueen&#8217;s second collaboration with the increasingly formidable Michael Fassbender, I felt a great amount of satisfaction from the way the film was able to get under my skin with it&#8217;s overwhelming sense of despair.</p>
<p>McQueen is often very simple in his technical approach, and the story itself relies on the same kind of intense simplicity.  Fassbender plays Brandon Sullivan, I New York man who is consumed by his sex addiction and seems to spend almost every moment of the film charming women, having sex, wankin&#8217; off, or trying to hide his unruly sexual impulses.  Carey Mulligan plays Sullivan&#8217;s sister, who shows up at Brandon&#8217;s apartment, and decides to stay with him and thus disrupting his self-imposed lifestyle.</p>
<p>What makes the film worth seeing is undoubtedly Fassbender&#8217;s unflinching and occasionally terrifying performance of a man who by the end of the film seems to evoke nothing but scorn and pity, despite the fact that he spends much of the film getting laid.  I will say that the film&#8217;s NC-17 rating is probably rightfully earned due to the unwavering amount of sex and nudity in the film, but make no mistake about it, there&#8217;s nothing sexy about the way the film portrays its main character.  Also, Carey Mulligan shows she&#8217;s more than game for sparring opposite Fassbender, as her performance makes for quite a bit of a departure from the kind of good-natured characters she&#8217;s played recently.</p>
<p>The film is filled with a lot of noticeably long takes and a certain kind of detached feeling, which I think for the most part works in favor of a character whose motives are never easy to understand.  And despite the film&#8217;s artful nature, subtlety is never really something that the film goes for, which gives it the feeling of a film like <em>Precious</em> or <em>Requiem For A Dream</em> where you get this sense of the filmmaker trying to pound into you this message of hopelessness.  And for that, I can&#8217;t really wholeheartedly recommend the film since it&#8217;s probably bound to put you in a morose mood.  However, I still applaud the film for being able to pull off that kind of torrid earnestness with a subject as potentially laughable as sex addiction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4312</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Sky&#8217;s the Limit</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4118</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4118#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 11:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim Bethesda is among the most ambitious developers in gaming. Time and time again, they try to deliver on the impossible: An open world, brimming with life and opportunity, that a player can interact with however they want. It&#8217;s been a few years since they brought their brand of entertainment to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/skyrim.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><em>The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/5.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Bethesda is among the most ambitious developers in gaming. Time and time again, they try to deliver on the impossible: An open world, brimming with life and opportunity, that a player can interact with however they want. It&#8217;s been a few years since they brought their brand of entertainment to the <em>Elder Scrolls</em> universe, having spent the last five years in the desolate wasteland of <em>Fallout</em>. Now fantasy is back with Skyrim, the closest Bethesda has ever been to their objective.</p>
<p><span id="more-4118"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4120" rel="attachment wp-att-4120"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/DragonMountains_wLegal-479x269.jpg" alt="" title="DragonMountains_wLegal" width="479" height="269" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-4120" /></a></p>
<p>Like the last <em>Elder Scrolls</em> game, <em>Oblivion</em>, you begin <em>Skyrim </em>imprisoned. You&#8217;re riding in a cart with fellow prisoners on your way to your execution. Sadly, there&#8217;s no Patrick Stewart to introduce you to the world, instead you get hilarious Nordic accents and a little Michael Hogan for good measure. When its your turn at the chopping block, a dragon rears its fire-breathing head and wrecks the place. You escape and you&#8217;re free&#8230; Really free.</p>
<p>The whole world of Skyrim is yours for the taking, and you are hardly obligated to follow the main story if you don&#8217;t want to. Yes, there could be a dragon apocalypse coming, but if you&#8217;d rather spend your time picking the pockets of beggars in the nearest city, by all means. Sure, the civil war between freedom-fighting racists and imperial fascists is going on all around you, but that doesn&#8217;t mean you have to join the fight. You can do whatever you want, and for me, that meant spelunking.</p>
<p>The sheer number of caves, dungeons and ruins to be explored in this game is staggering. So, when my Redguard archer went wandering after doing the first few story quests, it didn&#8217;t take long for me to go underground. Down there, I found an ancient Dwemer ruin, a city built buy long-extinct dwarves. There were falmer living there now, basically goblins, and I took it upon myself to masacre them, along with the old robots still guarding the place. I left the place burdened with trinkets and metals, so I headed to the nearest town and started smelting them. This became so engrossing that I decided I wanted to level my smithing skill all the way, and my journey into the game had truly begun &#8211; without any concern for dragons and political wars.</p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4121" rel="attachment wp-att-4121"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Orc2-479x269.jpg" alt="" title="Orc2" width="479" height="269" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-4121" /></a></p>
<p>That&#8217;s what makes Skyrim so extraordinary, everyone&#8217;s experience will be unique. There&#8217;s so much flexibility to the game, and yet it&#8217;s all handled so well. Take character creation, for instance. In <em>Oblivion</em>, I labored over my choice of race, birth sign, class and a daunting list of skills and attributes. Here, you simply chose a race. Each has certain advantages in certain skills, as well as a unique power, but it&#8217;s nothing earth-shattering. Birth signs are now stones scattered around the world that can easily be turned on at your will.  Classes are gone, as are attributes. Instead, the game simply rewards you for playing the way you want to play.</p>
<p>I started out thinking I wanted to use one-handed weapons and destruction magic, to take advantage of the game&#8217;s new dual wielding system. Instead, I quickly fell in love with sneaking around and killing foes with my bow and arrow. No big deal! Just by using those tactics, they got stronger. It&#8217;s a brilliant system, especially when you consider the way leveling up works. Each skill has an individual level. When you level enough skills up, your character levels up. Then, you get to chose to increase your health, magic or stamina &#8211; whatever works for you, as well as put a perk into whatever skill tree you want. So you can, for example, make arrows do more damage from stealth or make spells cheaper to cast. It&#8217;s a brilliant system, in that it rewards both players who want to min/max and those who want to try everything.</p>
<p><em>Skyrim</em> is really good, but it&#8217;s not perfect. The combat system still isn&#8217;t that great, I felt that melee combat was always fairly imprecise and less entertaining than ranged &#8211; more than once I accidentally killed my companion with a single off-target swing. The game&#8217;s item system, with its signature over-encumbrance mechanic, takes a while to get used to for loot-aholics like myself. And the technical bugs, my goodness! Quests you can&#8217;t turn in, guests showing up dead to your wedding, dragons flying backwards; there&#8217;s some weird shit going down in this town. But it will be patched to perfection someday, Bethesda promises, and no bug was ever enough to stop me from playing.</p>
<p><em>Skyrim</em> is simply one of the best games I&#8217;ve ever played. It&#8217;s kind of crazy that I&#8217;m writing that, since I never really cared for a Bethesda product before. I&#8217;ve always wanted to, but they were always too much RPG for me. Now they&#8217;ve finally succeeded at making the game that transcends its genre and can truly be called a masterpiece. I think I&#8217;m gonna go play some more right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4118</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mild Greetings</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4298</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4298#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2011 18:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Merry such and such from all of us here at Mildly Pleased! Here&#8217;s hoping to a frank and productive holiday!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Merry such and such from all of us here at Mildly Pleased! Here&#8217;s hoping to a frank and productive holiday!<br />
<iframe width="479" height="273" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/QQlr_QRDrz8?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4298</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Glacial Romance</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4275</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4275#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 02:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Young Adult Director Jason Reitman is kind of, sort of becoming an auteur. Through four films now, he&#8217;s told unique, character-focused stories full of wit and darkness. Young Adult&#8216;s Mavis Gary (Charlize Theron) follows in the footsteps of Nick Naylor, Juno and Ryan Bingham as a character deeply set in her ways, forced to confront [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/young-adult.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><em>Young Adult</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Director Jason Reitman is kind of, sort of becoming an auteur. Through four films now, he&#8217;s told unique, character-focused stories full of wit and darkness. <em>Young Adult</em>&#8216;s Mavis Gary (Charlize Theron) follows in the footsteps of Nick Naylor, Juno and Ryan Bingham as a character deeply set in her ways, forced to confront the one thing that could actually change her life. Like those characters, Mavis stands in juxtaposition to the world around her. But her arc is much darker and less sympathetic than you might expect.</p>
<p>Mavis is a marginally successful author of a young adult fiction series. She didn&#8217;t actually create the series, she just ghost writes the latest entries in it. As she starts work on her latest novel, she immediately begins procrastinating and opens her email. There she finds a message from her old boyfriend, Buddy Slade (Patrick Wilson) announcing the birth of his daughter. Mavis interprets this as a sign that he wants her to save him from his wife and newborn and run away together. So she leaves the big city and heads home.</p>
<p>Before she can get to Buddy, Mavis runs into another former classmate, Matt Freehauf (Patton Oswalt) at a bar. Matt is a fat geek who was badly beaten by a group of jocks who thought he was gay in high school. They may not have gotten along in high school, but now the have a mutual love of alcohol and a mutual hate of their hometown. What they do not agree upon is Mavis&#8217; crazy plan to win back Buddy. Chaos ensues.</p>
<p>Much emphasis is put on Mavis&#8217; daily life. We see her sloppy home, her daily rituals, her writing process. Every day begins with a swig of Diet Coke. Her writing is inspired by crappy teen TV shows and eavesdropping. When necessary, she can clean up too. Clothes shopping, hair pieces, makeup, manicures and pedicures are all utilized to turn her into a super model, to make her stand out in her town of limping Patton Oswalts and poorly-bearded Patrick Wilsons.</p>
<p>By the end of the movie, it&#8217;s explained why Mavis is the way she is, why her plan made sense to her. But that actually makes her a less likable character. The big speech at the end is actually hilarious, because it&#8217;s the opposite of what I wanted to hear. That&#8217;s what makes this movie great, I think. It plays with your expectations, to a degree. Diablo Cody is the writer, but this feels nothing like <em>Juno</em>. It&#8217;s much more sincere, and bleak.</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s not <em>Up in the Air</em>. I think of all the Jason Reitman movies, this one is the hardest to like. It simply lacks the charm his first three movies had. But this film&#8217;s rawness makes it good in its own right. The three leads all give terrific performances, making it all the more enjoyable. Reitman is one of my favorite directors right now because he keeps growing as a filmmaker. This is a worthy step forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4275</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>C.A.T: The Beach Boys&#8217; Christmas Album</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4280</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4280#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 21:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Beach Boys &#8211; The Beach Boys&#8217; Christmas Album (1964) It&#8217;s been awhile since we did a Classic Album Tuesday and what better time to chronicle something festive? The Beach Boys&#8217; Christmas Album is hardly a classic but really there are only so many good rock albums about Christmas. Colin already did the best one A [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Christmas+Album+Cover1.png" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">The Beach Boys &#8211; <em>The Beach Boys&#8217; Christmas Album</em> (1964)</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>It&#8217;s been awhile since we did a Classic Album Tuesday and what better time to chronicle something festive? <em>The Beach Boys&#8217; Christmas Album</em> is hardly a classic but really there are only so many good rock albums about Christmas. Colin already did the best one <em>A Christmas Gift for You from Phil Spector</em> but in the grand scheme of Christmas rock albums I think a lot can be said about this release as well. For one the album actually features a handful of original compositions including the hit single &#8220;Little Saint Nick&#8221; so not only did <em>The Beach Boys</em> have a hit Christmas song, but an original hit Christmas song. Another item of note is that this album was recorded while the band was still popular and not in their dwindling twilight. How many times have you seen a former talented artist now old fogey reduced to doing an album of Christmas themed covers? Probably more than a few so it&#8217;s nice to listen to a group take a stab at it in their prime. I&#8217;m not denying that this album was most likely a quick cash-in concocted by the group&#8217;s record company but at least it&#8217;s a sincere effort.</p>
<p>A lot of artists can record Christmas songs and give us little that we haven&#8217;t already heard but naturally <em>The Beach Boys</em> were and are still known for a distinct style. The group&#8217;s complex vocal arrangements put a unique spin on such classics as &#8220;White Christmas&#8221; and &#8220;I&#8217;ll Be Home for Christmas&#8221; and Brian Wilson&#8217;s beautiful multilayered production provides excellent backing. Of course it&#8217;s a delightful holiday treat to hear everyone&#8217;s favorite surf rock group sing the classics but I think it&#8217;s the group&#8217;s original seasonal compositions that make this album worth stuffing in your stocking. &#8220;Little Saint Nick&#8221; is undeniably catchy as is my favorite &#8220;Santa&#8217;s Beard&#8221; these certainly don&#8217;t sound like songs that have bee hashed out for a quick buck. I only wish these original compositions weren&#8217;t so few and weren&#8217;t so short which in turn gives the album a surprisingly brief runtime of about 27 minutes.</p>
<p>So if you&#8217;re feeling festive or need some nice holiday themed backing to your Christmas party this is one I&#8217;d highly recommend from one the 1960&#8242;s best. Which reminds me, you&#8217;re probably going to be seeing me post a great deal about <em>The Beach Boys</em> in the following year now that the surviving members have recently reunited to tour and record a new album, how&#8217;s that for a surprise holiday gift?</p>
<p><strong>Favorite Tracks:</strong> &#8220;Little Saint Nick&#8221;, &#8220;The Man with All the Toys&#8221;, &#8220;Santa&#8217;s Beard&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4280</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Gold, the Bad and the Ugly</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4265</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4265#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 05:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s hard to put forth the time or effort on the blog when we have the holidays at hand but here&#8217;s something I always enjoy talking about and hey it&#8217;s relevant. So the Golden Globe nominations came out recently which means we are just one step closer to getting a good idea of who will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Capture.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><p>It&#8217;s hard to put forth the time or effort on the blog when we have the holidays at hand but here&#8217;s something I always enjoy talking about and hey it&#8217;s relevant. So the Golden Globe nominations came out recently which means we are just one step closer to getting a good idea of who will be the main contenders this Oscar season. It definitely seems a little harder to pin down then last year but that&#8217;s what makes it exciting, who knows what could happen! We definitely have a few frontrunners but there&#8217;s still a great deal of ifs and maybes in most of the categories.<br />
<span id="more-4265"></span></p>
<p>Already it sounds like Michel Hazanavicius&#8217; silent romance film <i>The Artist</I> is the film to beat in the Best Picture category. Though I haven&#8217;t seen it yet I eagerly await it&#8217;s release here in Seattle (December 23rd at the Harvard Exit) the general consensus seems to be that it&#8217;s nothing short of a fantastic heartfelt tribute to cinema. Other bets that are starting to shape up as future Oscar contenders are Golden Globe nominees <i>The Help</I>, <i>Hugo</i>, <i>The Descendants</I>, and <i>Moneyball</I>. I&#8217;ve seen all four of these films now and I believe they&#8217;re all justified nominations by whoever runs the Golden Globes, I&#8217;ll assume the Mole People. <i>War Horse</I> was also selected for the best picture drama category so I&#8217;m just going to have to continue to assume it&#8217;s good until I can actually see it when it opens around Christmas. <i>The Ides of March</I> is a bit of surprise seeing that it was in and out of theaters without much talk. I remember hearing it was good but not if it was Oscar good, maybe the Golden Globes threw this is in to rattle some cages? In the Best Picture Comedy/Musical category I&#8217;m going to go ahead and assume only <i>The Artist</I> and <i>Midnight in Paris</I> will advance to the Oscar&#8217;s Best Picture category but it&#8217;s hard to say, I didn&#8217;t see <i>My Week with Marilyn</I> so I&#8217;m not sure if it&#8217;s a movie that&#8217;s all around good or mostly just good because of it&#8217;s strong performances. </p>
<p>With any awards ceremony we have the snubs with perhaps the most notable being <i>The Tree of Life</I> which could still resurface around Oscar time. I was also surprised to see no presence by <i>Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy</I>. I mean that&#8217;s supposed to be a good one right? I thought this was supposed to be Gary Oldman&#8217;s year but we&#8217;ll just have to wait and see which Politcal-esque thriller the Oscars ends up selecting, <i>Ides of March</I> or <i>Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy</I> if either. There&#8217;s been a lot of buzz around Stephen Daldry&#8217;s <I>Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close</I>  but I believe it missed the Golden Globes cutoff so it&#8217;s definitely a film that could resurface during the Oscars. I would of liked to see <i>Drive</I> get some recognition beyond it&#8217;s one supporting actor nom for Albert Brooks, it is a bit of a dark horse but it would certainly make any awards show that much cooler by having it included.</p>
<p>The acting categories seem to a bit of tossup right now with the one exception of Christopher Plummer in the supporting actor category for his role in <i>Beginners</I>. I hear he&#8217;s great and it&#8217;s always nice to see a Hollywood veteran finally get the gold, not to mention it&#8217;s a weak field this year. Probably the next best bet in an acting category is Viola Davis for <i>The Help</i>. Earlier this year I thought Glenn Close would be a shoe in for Best Actress for dressing as a man in <I>Albert Nobbs</I> but the reviews haven&#8217;t been to kind to that film so that takes a big hit to her chances. In the supporting actress category I&#8217;d again go with <I>The Help</I> for Octavia Spencer but she actually has some competition from Shailene Woodley in <i>The Descendants</I> and maybe Berenice Bejo for <i>The Artist</I>. I found it amusing that Jessica Chastain was nominated for <i>The Help</I> because not only has her name popped up in almost every award ceremony in this category but it hasn&#8217;t always been for the same movie. She&#8217;s got a chance to be nominated for supporting actress for <i>The Tree of Life</I>, <I>Take Shelter</I>, or <i>The Help</I>, she wont win any of them but she is slowly but surely becoming a force to be reckoned with in Hollywood.</p>
<p>Strangely enough one of the hardest categories this year is Best Actor, I have no idea. A lot of people seemed to enjoy Leonard DiCaprio&#8217;s portrayal of <i>J. Edgar</I> but not so much the film itself so it&#8217;s hard to say. I&#8217;m sure Jean Dujardin is good in <i>The Artist</i> but could a modern actor really win in a role without dialogue? Michael Fassbender may have a good chance  but I haven&#8217;t seen <i>Shame</I> yet so it&#8217;s only a guess based on what I&#8217;ve heard here and there. I&#8217;m still wondering about Gary Oldman but it sounds like his performance may be too subtle for any award fare and not being nominated at the Globes does not help his Oscar campaign. Really there isn&#8217;t a clear frontrunner but that excites me, this is really shaping up to be an unpredictable awards season and I can&#8217;t wait to see more of these movies. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4265</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Assassin&#8217;s Creed Reservations</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4238</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4238#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 11:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Assassin&#8217;s Creed: Revelations Assassin&#8217;s Creed II ended on a bizarre, disarming note that I felt was brave for a modern, big budget game. Our hero, Desmond, is using a machine called the Animus to relive the life of his ancestor, Ezio Auditore da Firenze. After hours of building Ezio up, suffering his losses and enjoying [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/acr.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><em>Assassin&#8217;s Creed: Revelations</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><em>Assassin&#8217;s Creed II</em> ended on a bizarre, disarming note that I felt was brave for a modern, big budget game. Our hero, Desmond, is using a machine called the Animus to relive the life of his ancestor, Ezio Auditore da Firenze. After hours of building Ezio up, suffering his losses and enjoying his achievements, the game flipped everything on itself: Ezio was irrelevant, Desmond is the only person who matters and this story is a whole lot crazier than its conspiracy theory roots suggested. &#8220;What the fuck,&#8221; indeed. I couldn&#8217;t have been more excited, what a finish! Where would Ubisoft take the franchise next? There was so much potential. Now it&#8217;s two years and two sequels later and I&#8217;m kind of worried about the future of the franchise.</p>
<p><span id="more-4238"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4244" rel="attachment wp-att-4244"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/screen_003tcm1918649-479x270.jpg" alt="" title="screen_003tcm1918649" width="479" height="270" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-4244" /></a></p>
<p>As far as AAA action games go, the <em>Assassin&#8217;s Creed</em> story is pretty cool, sort of like a time-traveling <em>Inception</em>. But the problem is the developers have focused all their effort on the dream instead of the reality &#8211; giving us an entire Ezio trilogy, even though his role is the meta plot was essentially over in the first game. <em>Brotherhood</em> has this problem, but addressed it by explaining that Ezio was now just further training for Desmond and giving plenty of time to build the personalities of the modern day assassins. <em>Revelations</em>, is actually really lacking in the revelations department, especially because the entire story takes place within the Animus.</p>
<p>It seems after the ending of <em>Brotherhood</em>, Desmond&#8217;s mind is rightfully screwed up. We&#8217;ve been told the Animus can have that effect on people. So we get to watch him try to put his mind back together&#8230; From within his mind. Don&#8217;t really worry about it, because you&#8217;ll quickly be taken into Ezio&#8217;s world and never really given a reason to come back out. So the Ezio story better be pretty damn important, right? Well, no. He&#8217;s looking for something Altair (the protagonist of the first game, so long ago) left behind and it brings him to Constantinople. Then the game turns into <em>Brotherhood</em> in Istanbul: Ezio must recruit new assassins, reclaim the city from the templars and find the big secret at the end. Except the big secret at the end isn&#8217;t that exciting, because, well, Ezio shouldn&#8217;t have starred in three games. But here we are.</p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4245" rel="attachment wp-att-4245"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/ACR_screen_gamescom_001tcm1922518-479x270.jpg" alt="" title="ACR_screen_gamescom_001tcm1922518" width="479" height="270" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-4245" /></a></p>
<p>For the most part,<em> Revelations</em> plays just like the last game. That is to say, it&#8217;s still one of the best stealth action games on the market. It remains awesome to drop down out of nowhere and stab a fool in the throat. It remains frustrating to simply want to run around on the roof tops but instead be forced to deal with annoying, highly suspicious guards. All the city building elements return, you can still buy new gear that is ultimately made redundant by unlocks and there&#8217;s almost always more than one way to accomplish your objective. This many games in, the forumla isn&#8217;t going to be drastically changed. But it has been tweaked a little.</p>
<p>Early on, Ezio shows off some of his new gear: parachutes, the hook blade and custom bombs. Parachutes add a fun element to traversal and seem tailor-made for the people who liked flying in <em>Assassin&#8217;s Creed II</em>. The hook blade speeds up climbing and allows Ezio to slide around on zip lines, plus it adds a little more interaction to free running. That&#8217;s nice, since at this point, holding right trigger, A and up was getting kind of tired. I&#8217;ve never found bombs particularly useful, but the bomb crafting component is kind of neat and at the very least a solid source of income.</p>
<p>But not everything new is good: now when you take over a district, templars can try to take it back. If that happens, you are punished by having to play a tower defense minigame. No gameplay mechanic that is introduced as a punishment can be that fun. It&#8217;s a fairly barebones take on the genre and not particularly fun or challenging. I get that they were trying to give the game a grander scale and a better sense of the push and pull nature of this war, but this aspect of the game became something I dreaded on focused on avoiding. Unfortunately, it can be triggered any time you draw attention to yourself by doing things like investing in small businesses or killing people, so the minigame was kind of difficult to avoid. At least it can be permanently shut down by installing a maximum level assassin in the den.</p>
<p>Outside of Constantinople, you will get the occasional chance to play through critical moments in Altair&#8217;s past. They are brief, easy missions that remind us that hey, this guy was pretty cool, wish we could&#8217;ve spent a little more time with him. Also, if you&#8217;re feeling feisty, you can step back and go into a different part of Desmond&#8217;s brain. Here, you play weird first person platforming sections while Desmond talks about his life, starting with growing up in a weird assassin hippie commune. It&#8217;s odd and just challenging and interesting enough to be worthwhile.</p>
<p>Multiplayer is back and the same as ever. The you hunt someone while someone else hunts you game mode is the most fun to play, if that sort of thing sounds entertaining to you. I didn&#8217;t really play much of the last game&#8217;s multiplayer, but I heard that community dried up pretty fast, so if this is something you want to get in on, you should probably get in now. It&#8217;s not really for me, but I think it&#8217;s kind of cool and I like that it&#8217;s a multiplayer mode that is actually, tangentially, related to the story.</p>
<p>By the end <em>Revelations</em>, you&#8217;ll have seen the highlight of Altair&#8217;s life, most of Ezio&#8217;s life and heard Desmond&#8217;s life&#8217;s story. That&#8217;s everybody, right? We don&#8217;t have to keep going backwards, do we? At this point, I have no doubt that there will be another one of these games out around this time next year; I just hope it&#8217;s a true sequel. <em>Assassin&#8217;s Creed</em> has stalled out and needs to change things up or it might just wake up dead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4238</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>T3: Winter Songs</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4223</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4223#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 07:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Ten]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You could basically say we&#8217;ve begun winter by now, despite the fact that the winter solstice isn&#8217;t for another two weeks.  Regardless, it&#8217;s cold, it&#8217;s dark, and if it weren&#8217;t for Christmas, it&#8217;d be altogether depressing, and much of the music I listen to around this time of year reflects that.  So as a counterpoint [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/The-Walkmen-While-I-Shovel-the-Snow.png" width="240" />
		</p><p>You could basically say we&#8217;ve begun winter by now, despite the fact that the winter solstice isn&#8217;t for another two weeks.  Regardless, it&#8217;s cold, it&#8217;s dark, and if it weren&#8217;t for Christmas, it&#8217;d be altogether depressing, and much of the music I listen to around this time of year reflects that.  So as a counterpoint to the <a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?p=903">Top Ten Summer Songs</a> I did last May, I&#8217;m presenting you with my top ten favorite winter songs.  The most obvious criteria is not only that they feature winter as a prominent theme, but also that they&#8217;re songs that aren&#8217;t associated in any way with Christmas.</p>
<p><span id="more-4223"></span></p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;">10. Simon &amp; Garfunkel &#8211; &#8220;Hazy Shade Of Winter&#8221;</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/bnZdlhUDEJo" frameborder="0" width="479" height="25"></iframe><br />
Honestly, I&#8217;m not that big a fan of this song.  But the other song that I was considering for the number ten spot was Vampire Weekend&#8217;s &#8220;Horchata&#8221;, and I didn&#8217;t want to turn this into more of an indie-rock lovefest than it already is.  Still, it&#8217;s Simon &amp; Garfunkel, it&#8217;s got winter in the title, and it&#8217;s certainly not terrible.  So there you go.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;">9. Galaxie 500 &#8211; &#8220;Snowstorm&#8221;</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/VejZKCpNnrs" frameborder="0" width="479" height="25"></iframe><br />
This song is pretty cool just because it depicts one of the great childhood winter pastimes, especially if you live in a place like the Northwest.  It&#8217;s the pastime of quietly waiting for a snowstorm, constantly looking out the window, listening to the weatherman, and then finally watching with wide-eyed wonderment as the snowflakes come trickling down.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;">8. Death Cab For Cutie &#8211; &#8220;The New Year&#8221;</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/2MwhxdGAnic" frameborder="0" width="479" height="25"></iframe><br />
Of course leave it to Death Cab to make a joyous occasion like the New Year&#8217;s celebration sound like such a bummer.  But I guess that&#8217;s one way of looking at the birth of a new year, as just another opportunity for the same old shit to repeat itself.  Still, you&#8217;ve got to give credit to Death Cab for bashing the song out with a kind of liberated energy despite it&#8217;s downbeat message.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;">7. The Walkmen &#8211; &#8220;In The New Year&#8221;</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/f2GzL7q6Wj0" frameborder="0" width="479" height="25"></iframe><br />
And then on the other end of the spectrum, you&#8217;ve got The Walkmen spouting the message that the New Year presents you with the opportunity to start anew and to proclaim &#8220;It&#8217;s gonna be a good year!&#8221;, as Walkmen singer Hamilton Leithauser does with an undeniable conviction.  Of course, with songs like &#8220;Blizzard Of &#8217;96&#8243; and &#8220;While I Shovel The Snow&#8221;, The Walkmen are a very &#8220;winter-y&#8221; band with lots of possibilities for a list like this, but for me it&#8217;s hard for any Walkmen song to compete with &#8220;In The New Year&#8221;.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;">6. Elliott Smith &#8211; &#8220;Angel In The Snow&#8221;</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/WswmPBW3ezM" frameborder="0" width="479" height="25"></iframe><br />
Much like The Walkmen, Elliott Smith is another artist whose music seems pretty well suited for those colder months.  Of course, the amazing thing about &#8220;Angel In The Snow&#8221; is the fact that it wasn&#8217;t even released until the collection of outtakes <em>New Moon</em> came out in the wake of Smith&#8217;s untimely death.  And then of course there&#8217;s that sequence from <em>Up In The Air</em>, which gives the song an even greater resonance as a quintessential winter song.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;">5. The National &#8211; &#8220;Apartment Story&#8221;</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/G6dqDoQhgm8" frameborder="0" width="479" height="25"></iframe><br />
With their their modest but nonetheless comforting sound, The National have been one of my go-to bands during the last two winters.  &#8221;Apartment Story&#8221; for me is one of the quintessential National songs, as it&#8217;s a &#8220;grower&#8221; in the best possible sense.  It starts out simply, talking about how the colder months cause us to &#8220;stay inside and wait for the winter to leave&#8221;, before building to a rousing chorus of hope and optimism.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;">4. Fleet Foxes &#8211; &#8220;White Winter Hymnal&#8221;</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/gml-nAJGRbY" frameborder="0" width="479" height="25"></iframe><br />
Fleet Foxes may have used Peter Breughal&#8217;s painting <em>The Netherlandish Proverbs</em> as the cover of their debut album, but for me the lush sound of &#8220;White Winter Hymnal&#8221; evokes another Bruegal painting, <a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_N6IFoS5MzpI/TMDvzKJS-3I/AAAAAAAAACU/rn1itU7b_QU/s1600/pieter-bruegel-hunters-in-the-snow.jpg">Hunters In The Snow</a>.  Yeah that&#8217;s right, I just dropped some art school knowledge on y&#8217;all.  Deal with it.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;">3. Bob Dylan &#8211; &#8220;Girl From The North Country&#8221;</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/2wsw_a0X6aQ" frameborder="0" width="479" height="25"></iframe><br />
This is a song that seems not only to evoke those New York winters that Dylan encountered in the early &#8217;60s, but also the unrelenting cold of his early years growing up in northern Minnesota.  Also, I have a very distinct memory of listening to this song every morning in December of 2004, when I&#8217;d have to walk to the bus stop each day at seven in the morning.  So for that reason, a cold chill seems to comes over me every time I hear &#8220;Girl From The North Country&#8221;.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;">2. Joni Mitchell &#8211; &#8220;River&#8221;</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/QPCJxVCcWtk" frameborder="0" width="479" height="25"></iframe><br />
This song almost borders on being a Christmas song, since I know there are some Christmas stations that play &#8220;River&#8221; in their rotation around this time of year, plus there&#8217;s that intro.  But I think the song is less about Christmas, and more about the memories that this time of year evokes, even when you&#8217;re stuck in the warm and sunny climate of Southern California that the Canadian Mitchell seems to be growing tired of in &#8220;River&#8221;.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: large;">1. The Mama&#8217;s And The Papa&#8217;s &#8211; &#8220;California Dreaming&#8221;</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/2xN9r0bWe78" frameborder="0" width="479" height="25"></iframe><br />
I couldn&#8217;t really think of any distinct personal favorite for this list, so I just decided to go with an old favorite.  I actually have no problem with winter, but some people seem to kind of hate it, and The Mama&#8217;s And The Papa&#8217;s appear to be those kind of people.  Their vision of winter takes on the feel of an Apocalyptic Road Movie, as this cross country treck towards California seems to be the only thing that will save them from the depressing monotony of winter.  Seriously, it&#8217;s not that bad guys, just curl up by the fire and enjoy yourself some hot chocolate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4223</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lowrider</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4213</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4213#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 17:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Black Keys &#8211; El Camino The new Black Keys&#8217; album is out and honestly I am not as excited about it as I thought I would be. Maybe it has something do with the fact that I&#8217;m a little burned out on The Black Keys or maybe it just doesn&#8217;t resonate with me as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Black-Keys-El-Camino1.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">The Black Keys &#8211; <em>El Camino</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>The new <i>Black Keys&#8217;</I> album is out and honestly I am not as excited about it as I thought I would be. Maybe it has something do with the fact that I&#8217;m a little burned out on <em>The Black Keys</em> or maybe it just doesn&#8217;t resonate with me as much as the stellar <em>Brothers</em>. Most people thus far seem to be hailing <em>El Camino</em> as another triumph on par with <em>Brothers</em> but I feel less enthusiastic. I enjoy it sure and in many ways it&#8217;s the most ambitious <i>Black Keys</I> record ever but it just doesn&#8217;t feel as sincere as past records. </p>
<p>In just a few years <i>The Black Keys</i> have risen from indie blues rock duo to a mainstream, grammy award winning, rock group and for the most part I welcome that. With that newfound success <i>The Black Keys</i> have complimented their stylings with a bigger and bolder sound. Changes have resulted in the band taking more time in the studio and in producer Brian &#8220;Danger Mouse&#8221; Burton more or less becoming the third member of the band producing and co-writing every song on the album, I suppose changes come in threes. <em>The Black Keys&#8217;</em> bare bones approach to blues/rock is no more and in way that&#8217;s necessary but also a little sad. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s hard to describe, I do like this album but for whatever reason it doesn&#8217;t strike a chord with me. I love all the vintage sounds and retro techniques but aside from a handful of songs I don&#8217;t have that urge to listen to it again and again like I did with <em>Brothers</em> or going way back <em>The Big Come Up</em>. That being said there are still some songs here that I really enjoy. &#8220;Lonely Boy&#8221; is an excellent rock single as is &#8220;Dead and Gone&#8221; and I&#8217;m digging the bluesy female backup vocals. &#8220;Nova Baby&#8221; is easily my favorite track as it really doesn&#8217;t sound like anything the <em>Keys</em> have ever done before, pure pop bliss. Maybe my problem was that I wanted something unreasonably different, more indie pop oriented like <i>Nova Baby</I> and not so much big grandiose rock. So it&#8217;s probably a combination of desiring something more simple and also being a little burned out on the group I can&#8217;t seem to get away from. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m always a stickler for ratings, out of the 15 or so albums I&#8217;ve reviewed this year I think I only gave three albums 4 or more stars, so I&#8217;m sorry to put <em>El Camino</em> in that majority of 3 to 3 1/2 reviews but for now I agree with that. Could that rating change someday? Maybe, could I completely change my mind about this album someday? Maybe, all I know is that at this point in time it feels like an all too familiar rock record instead of something new and amazing. I&#8217;m glad to see <em>The Keys</em> have entered new pop/rock territory and with that being said I hope they continue to experiment because I&#8217;ll always be there to check it out no matter how burned out. </p>
<p><strong>Favorite Tracks:</strong> &#8220;Dead and Gone&#8221;, &#8220;Lonely Boy&#8221;, &#8220;Nova Baby&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4213</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Celluloid Dreams</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4194</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4194#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 05:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hugo As a longtime fan of Martin Scorsese&#8217;s films, I really couldn&#8217;t help but feel anything other than utter bewilderment after seeing the first trailer for his latest film, Hugo.  I was just thinking, &#8220;Ok.  So has Martin Scorsese gone off the deep end?  This just looks like some silly little 3D kids movie devoid [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/hugo-movie-poster2.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><em>Hugo</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>As a longtime fan of Martin Scorsese&#8217;s films, I really couldn&#8217;t help but feel anything other than utter bewilderment after seeing the first trailer for his latest film, <em>Hugo</em>.  I was just thinking, &#8220;Ok.  So has Martin Scorsese gone off the deep end?  This just looks like some silly little 3D kids movie devoid of any reason for me to care about it whatsoever&#8221;.  But alas it turned out I was terribly mistaken, since unbeknownst to me the film was deeply rooted in film history, and surprisingly is among the more personal films in Scorsese&#8217;s canon.</p>
<p><span id="more-4194"></span></p>
<p>Based on Brian Selznick&#8217;s novel, <em>The Invention of Hugo Caberet</em>, the film centers around a young orphan boy (Asa Butterfield), who lives in a Paris railway station, and spends all of his time mending and operating the clocks in the station.  Hugo happens to stumble upon a grumpy old man (Ben Kingsley) who runs a magic shop in the station, and eventually Hugo becomes friends with the old man&#8217;s goddaughter, Isabelle (Chloe Moretz).  The two of them then slowly uncover the fact that the reclusive old man, George Melies, was in fact the man that us cinephiles now know as one of the fathers of cinema.  Then from there, we see Melies struggling with his own past and learning to embrace his earlier work, almost all of which appears to have been lost.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s kind of amazing to me that Scorsese has never really made a film that dealt explicitly with the history of film, and it&#8217;s really quite wonderful the way he presents the films of George Melies and the stories behind them with such care and wonderment.  I&#8217;m not sure how much modern audiences, or kids especially would get out of the cinematic history lesson that is really at the heart of the film, but for me the emotional quality of  how we see Melies grapple with his past glories seemed pretty universal.  And I think Scorsese does a pretty good job of making the film have this kind of childlike wonderment, which I think would make the film palettable for all ages.</p>
<p>I will say that the first half of the film didn&#8217;t have me quite as hooked in as I was in the latter half, when Melies&#8217; story becomes more prominent.  I think this mainly stems from some of the scenes just feeling a bit clunky, and it might of been the writing, or possibly the acting, as Scorsese does rely quite a bit on the child actors to carry the film, which is not an easy thing to pull off.  Still, even when a scene or two fell a bit flat, there was still this overarching sense of whimsy and fascination in not only movies, but also in all kinds of magic and fantastical machinery that carries the film.</p>
<p>Since the theater I went to was only showing <em>Hugo</em> in 3-D, I suppose I should comment on it, and I can&#8217;t really say I had any problem with it.  Scorsese is not a filmmaker that I would have ever imagined doing an effects-laden 3-D film like this, but the critical consensus seems to be that Melies himself probably would have been a supporter of 3-D films like this, and I would have to agree with that.  And whether 3-D is in fact a passing fad or not, I think <em>Hugo</em> will hold up as a charming and heartfelt ode to cinema, regardless of what dimension it&#8217;s in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4194</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Retrospecticus: The Black Keys</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4152</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4152#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 22:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Retrospecticus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s an exciting time to be a Black Keys fan as this Akron, Ohio duo is as hot as ever. Coming off their most successful and arguably best album The Black Keys have hit the mainstream, but it didn&#8217;t happen overnight. Dan Auerbach (guitar/vocals) and Patrick Carney (drums) have together made seven albums under the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/black_keys.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><p>It&#8217;s an exciting time to be a <em>Black Keys</em> fan as this Akron, Ohio duo is as hot as ever. Coming off their most successful and arguably best album <em>The Black Keys</em> have hit the mainstream, but it didn&#8217;t happen overnight. Dan Auerbach (guitar/vocals) and Patrick Carney (drums) have together made seven albums under the <em>Keys</em> moniker and it has been a long way to the top. The group&#8217;s new album <em>El Camino</em> produced by Danger Mouse looks to be another album much in the vein of the catchy blues-rock explosion <em>Brothers</em> but we&#8217;ll just have to wait and see. Until then I figured I&#8217;d revisit all the <em>Key&#8217;s</em> past albums. Now I&#8217;d be lying if I said it wasn&#8217;t a little boring listening to so much bare bones blues/rock but it was an experience nonetheless.</p>
<p><span id="more-4152"></span></p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span style="font-size: large;"><em>The Big Come Up (2002)</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4157" rel="attachment wp-att-4157"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-4157" title="B000063WDH.01.LZZZZZZZ" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/B000063WDH.01.LZZZZZZZ2-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a><em>The Big Come Up</em> is your standard rock/blues debut but with a few twists and tweaks to the genre to make it stand out. <em>The Big Come Up</em> diversifies with it&#8217;s raw modern take on the blues, including various eclectic covers of traditional songs, and hey, even a <em>Beatles</em> number thrown into the mix. Though the duo&#8217;s bare bones almost primal approach to old blues numbers is always intriguing it&#8217;s their original compositions that make this worth listening to. Early on were treated to the undeniably catchy &#8220;I&#8217;ll Be Your Man&#8221; which is also the theme to the HBO series <em>Hung</em>. Songs like &#8220;I&#8217;ll Be Your Man&#8221; showcase the duo&#8217;s strength in carrying a melodic rock song in what&#8217;s more or less the most basic package it could be delivered in.</p>
<p>Even on their first album vocalist/guitarist Dan Auerbach displays some early hints of great melodic ability not only as a vocalist, but also as a melodic guitarist. Auerbach&#8217;s guitar in &#8220;Countdown&#8221; is as bright and memorable as any vocal line could be and were treated to that style time and time again. &#8220;The Breaks&#8221; is another favorite with it&#8217;s whining bends accompanied by a nifty shuffle from Patrick Carney. The drum work from Carney is for the most part fairly basic but sufficient. Rather than showing off with big fills and intricate parts Carney keeps it very simple as to better compliment Auerbach&#8217;s guitar. <em>The Big Come Up</em> is everything you could want in a genre often overlooked today and stands as an excellent introduction to this group.</p>
<p><strong>Favorite Tracks:</strong> &#8220;The Breaks&#8221;, &#8220;Countdown&#8221;, &#8220;I&#8221;ll Be Your Man&#8221;</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span style="font-size: large;"><em>Thickfreakness (2003)</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4165" rel="attachment wp-att-4165"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/839821-150x150.jpg" alt="" title="83982" width="150" height="150" class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-4165" /></a>Whereas songs on <i>The Big Come Up</i> tended to go along at a fairly moderate bluesy pace <i>Thickfreakness</i> kicks it up a notch. The songs here are faster, more intense, and more energetic especially on drummer Patrick Carney&#8217;s part. What I wouldn&#8217;t give to have a song like &#8220;Set You Free&#8221; in <em>Rock Band</em> with that <em>George of the Jungle-like</em> drum part. It&#8217;s catchy songs like &#8220;Set You Free&#8221; that helped propel <i>The Black Keys</i> and this album to a somewhat larger audience.</p>
<p>According to Wikipedia <i>Thickfreakness</i> was recorded in 14 hours in Patrick Carney&#8217;s basement on an early 1980s 8-track recorder and that only makes me like it more. I suppose there is kind of a rushed manic feel to <i>Thickfreakness</i> and the feeling of two guys just running on pure adrenaline only makes this album rock that much more. The songs aren&#8217;t quite as intriguing as the tracks on <i>The Big Come Up</i> which probably makes it my least favorite <i>Keys</i> record, but there&#8217;s plenty to like in retro songs like &#8220;Hard Row&#8221; and the a cover of <i>The Sonic&#8217;s</i> &#8220;Have Love Will Travel&#8221;.</p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;Hard Row&#8221;, &#8220;&#8221;If You See Me&#8221;, &#8220;Set You Free&#8221; </p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span style="font-size: large;"><em>Rubber Factory (2004)</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4170" rel="attachment wp-att-4170"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/album-rubber-factory-150x150.jpg" alt="" title="album-rubber-factory" width="150" height="150" class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-4170" /></a>Named after the very fact that it was recorded in a rubber factory in the duo&#8217;s hometown of Akron, Ohio the <i>Keys&#8217;</I> third album is big and echoey with plenty of sludgy guitar rock to satisfy. The songs aren&#8217;t necessarily the group&#8217;s strongest but it brims with distorted intensity. Early on there wasn&#8217;t much that drew me into the album with the exception of the excellent radio friendly &#8220;10 A.M Automatic&#8221; that has a great music video directed by David Cross by the way. Though by about the fourth or fifth song I started to develop an appreciation for the &#8220;grooves&#8221; forged on this album and now I enjoy it. </p>
<p>This is also about the time where <i>Black Keys&#8217;</I> songs started to appear in countless commercials. To this day if you need a song to accompany a commercial about trucks this is your go to group and the heaviness of <i>Rubber Factory</i> has all ya need. </p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;10 A.M Automatic&#8221;, &#8220;All Hands Against His Own&#8221;, &#8220;Girl is On My Mind&#8221;</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span style="font-size: large;"><em>Magic Potion (2006)</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4174" rel="attachment wp-att-4174"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/the-black-keys-magic-potion-cd-cover-album-art1-150x150.jpg" alt="" title="the-black-keys-magic-potion-cd-cover-album-art" width="150" height="150" class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-4174" /></a>At this point I feel like I&#8217;m reviewing the same album for the third time in a row. Don&#8217;t get me wrong <i>Thickfreakness</I>, <i>Rubber Factory</I>, and <i>Magic Potion</I> are all good albums but they all sound more or less the same. I don&#8217;t blame the guys, there&#8217;s really only so much you can do with guitar and drums so it&#8217;s amazing they could keep it interesting after one record let alone this many. The thing that separates <I>Magic Potion</I> in my mind is that it&#8217;s the album that has &#8220;Your Touch&#8221; which I still consider the group&#8217;s defining song. I first heard the song on an episode of <i>Eastbound and Down</I> and ever since I&#8217;ve been drawn to the raw energy of that song and of this band. </p>
<p>For the most <i>Magic Potion</I> is the same ol&#8217; <I>Keys</I> but with even better production, and for the first time all original songs. That&#8217;s really all there is too it man. </p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;Strange Desire&#8221;, &#8220;Your Touch&#8221;, &#8220;You&#8217;re the One&#8221;</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span style="font-size: large;"><em>Attack &#038; Release (2008)</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4177" rel="attachment wp-att-4177"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/attack-and-release-front-150x150.jpg" alt="" title="attack and release front" width="150" height="150" class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-4177" /></a>Even though &#8220;Your Touch&#8221; was the song that got me into <i>The Black Keys</I> this was the first <i>Keys&#8217;</I> album I listened to. Kind of strange, &#8220;Man I really like this song so now I&#8217;m gonna go out and buy the album it&#8217;s not on.&#8221; I think it had to do with the fact that this was the newest <i>Keys</I> album so I went from there. <i>Attack &#038; Release</I> was an odd introduction to the duo as it&#8217;s more or less their departure from the standard two piece blues rock setup. Of course you&#8217;re always going to have a couple basic blues songs like&#8221;I Got Mine&#8221; one of the band&#8217;s most popular songs for some reason, but then you have the songs that are a little harder to categorize. What could of changed for the group? Aside from maybe the desire to experiment maybe it has something to with <i>Danger Mouse</I> coming on board as producer.</p>
<p>&#8220;Strange Times&#8221; is a perfect example of the <i>Keys</I> mixing up their sound into this eerie mish mash of piano, bass, echoey backup vocals, and various sound effects. You have all sorts of stuff thrown in this album from keyboards to a few drum machines, to more guitar effects, but it&#8217;s still kept in moderation when compared to the <i>Keys&#8217;</I> next album. This album is where we really get to see the duo&#8217;s prowess for songwriting and is a must listen for anyone interested in this band, it&#8217;s a real trip but it&#8217;s worth it. </p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;Psychotic Girl&#8221;, &#8220;Remember When (Side A)&#8221;, &#8220;Strange Times&#8221; </p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span style="font-size: large;"><em>Brothers (2010)</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=4184" rel="attachment wp-att-4184"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/cd-BlackKeys_brothers-150x150.jpg" alt="" title="cd-BlackKeys_brothers" width="150" height="150" class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-4184" /></a><i>Brothers</i> was a the natural progression for <i>The Black Keys</I> if they wanted to avoid becoming stale or predictable and it couldn&#8217;t of come at a better time. <i>Brothers</I> has not only become <i>The Keys</I> most heralded work but garnered everything from grammy nominations to many TV appearances including an appearance on <i>The Colbert Report</I> where <i>The Black Keys</I> argued with <i>Vampire Weeked</I> over who was the bigger sellout regarding their songs in commercials. Breaking away from the standard guitar/drum arrangement and adding in things like organ and bass on every song not only makes this the <i>Keys</I> most layered record but also their most thoroughly diverse and entertaining. </p>
<p>Blues rock is still intact on <i>Brothers</I> but in some case has been set aside for dabbling with R/B and soul (&#8220;The Only One&#8221;, &#8220;Never Gonna Give You Up&#8221;) and a more conventional rock sound (&#8220;Everlasting Light&#8221;, &#8220;Howlin&#8217; For You) though that last one definitely has it&#8217;s bluesy roots. What&#8217;s great about <i>Brothers</I> is it has given us an album that&#8217;s more accessible to newcomers of the band and at the same time treats the older fans with something they may have never expected, it&#8217;s like getting a surprise gift on Administrative Professional&#8217;s Day. </p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if most people now said this was their favorite <i>Keys</I. album, it's certainly mine. I'm excited about the band's new release but it's always tough when you're coming off not only your biggest commercial album to date but also your biggest album in general. No matter what I'm sure <i>El Camino</I> will be a joy if it continues the trend of a bigger <i>Keys</I>, and based off the single I think it will be </p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b>&#8220;Everlasting Light&#8221;, &#8220;Howlin&#8217; For You&#8221;, &#8220;The Only One&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4152</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Vault: Manhunt</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4132</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4132#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 00:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Vault]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Manhunt (2003) Time to get back into writing posts, been a little busy with finals but I&#8217;m ready now and I got a few things up my sleeve, i&#8217;ll start with this one I wrote awhile back. I always liked the idea of a segment reviewing older games good or bad that have at some [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Manhunt-Box-Art.jpeg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><em>Manhunt</em> (2003)</span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Time to get back into writing posts, been a little busy with finals but I&#8217;m ready now and I got a few things up my sleeve, i&#8217;ll start with this one I wrote awhile back. I always liked the idea of a segment reviewing older games good or bad that have at some time peaked my interest. Seeing that I&#8217;m always pushing to make it a recurring thing I decided to revisit a game that always intrigued me but never gave much of chance back in the day. The game is Rockstar&#8217;s <em>Manhunt</em> and it&#8217;s certainly an odd one. I have memories of being so excited for this game to come out and then when it did my brother and I pooled our money together and convinced one of my parents to buy it, not that they were ever restrictive of what I played. To me it looked like <em>Grand Theft Auto</em> (I guess there was only three back then) if it was a murderous horror movie and for some reason that got me excited, but not in a creepy way. When I finally did play it I had very mixed feelings. Here I was expecting something like a scary, action packed sandbox game and what I got was a difficult slow paced stealth game built around levels. I probably played it for no more than a few days before giving up on it entirely and never even beat the first level, but times have changed.</p>
<p>I started playing this again around Halloween and was quickly reminded of why I originally gave this up. This game does try your patience early on and it&#8217;s still my opinion that the beginning of the game is one of the most difficult parts. All you want to do is just leap out and start hacking people up, but that&#8217;s not what it&#8217;s all about. <em>Manhunt</em> is all about strategy, how you are going to accomplish your kill and how you&#8217;re going to avoid being noticed. It&#8217;s tough to get into if your a fairly impatient person like myself, but if you can you&#8217;ll be able to work into a rhythm and start to understand and appreciate the appeal of a good stealth game.</p>
<p><span id="more-4132"></span></p>
<p>The game follows James Earl Cash a prisoner on death row ready to be executed. On his way to the procedure that will end his life Cash is suddenly kidnapped by a group of henchman employed by an exploitation filmmaker named Lionel Starkweather (voiced by Brian Cox). Cash is transported to the gang infested Carcer City where through the direction of Starkweather through an ear piece must execute gang members so that it can be filmed to make f&#8217;ed up entertainment. Levels are called &#8220;Scenes&#8221; and after you beat a handful Starkweather&#8217;s men pick you up and take you to another part of Carcer only to begin the madness once again.</p>
<p>Based in the GTA universe and using what appears to be the same engine, <em>Manhunt</em> is basically GTA if it was about being a serial killer. The major differences between the two games is one: this is not a sandbox game (though the levels are huge) and two: this game heavily relies on stealth. Kills are performed by hiding, often in the shadows where you cannot be seen and then sneaking up gang members with various weapons including; plastic bags, shards of glass, knives, baseball bats, wire, machetes, and more. Being detected always makes situations more difficult so it really helps to utilize your environment in this game, mostly you use the radar that shows where enemies are located and whether or not they can see you. It may sound a little disappointing but I have to say the style of gameplay grows on you and eventually it becomes more and more enjoyable when new missions are given and new weapons are included. Of course later on there are guns which turn the game into a standard shoot em up but even that is just about as fun as combat in GTA.</p>
<p>What really made me get through <em>Manhunt</em> was the atmosphere. The music and sound effects are hella creepy and there&#8217;s some very scary sequences. This atmosphere combined with the style of gameplay gives it a kind of late 70s early 80s horror movie vibe that I couldn&#8217;t get enough off, sigh if I only I had finished the game. This game certainly pissed me off something royal from time to time with it&#8217;s difficulty. The beginning is a little tricky but near the end of the game it&#8217;s just madness with what seems like endless gang members. I gave up with only about two or three scenes left… But that doesn&#8217;t mean I won&#8217;t pick it up again.</p>
<p>This game can be just as annoying regarding all the predictable missions you&#8217;ll get. Naturally there&#8217;s a mission where you have to protect someone, another where you have to save victims without being seen, blah, blah and in the latter stages of the game it just gets all muddied up as a tired shooter game. So it&#8217;s definitely an oddity but I got to give it to the game, it&#8217;s unique. The style and graphics still hold up and it&#8217;s worth playing if you&#8217;re a fan of <em>GTA</em> Check-ch-check-check-check-ch-check it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4132</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Goodbye Happiness</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4111</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4111#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 23:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Los Campesinos! &#8211; Hello Sadness I was a little hesitant to listen to Hello Sadness, the fourth/third album from Los Campesinos. I am someone who really enjoyed Hold on Now, Youngster&#8230; and We are Beautiful, We are Doomed, but found Romance is Boring to be disappointing. If this album was another disappointment, it would be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/hellosadness.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Los Campesinos! &#8211; <em>Hello Sadness</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>I was a little hesitant to listen to <em>Hello Sadness</em>, the fourth/third album from Los Campesinos. I am someone who really enjoyed <em>Hold on Now, Youngster&#8230;</em> and <em>We are Beautiful, We are Doomed</em>, but found <em>Romance is Boring</em> to be disappointing. If this album was another disappointment, it would be hard for me to be optimistic about Los Campesinos&#8217; future. But, on the other hand, it&#8217;s been a while since I listened to something by these folks. It turns out I missed them. And <em>Hello Sadness</em>, ironically, is enough to give me hope.</p>
<p>If the title didn&#8217;t tip you off, it&#8217;s probably safe to say that this collection of songs wasn&#8217;t inspired by good times. No, the imagery here is dark, the themes miserable &#8211; but with that signature Campesinos sardonic wit. It&#8217;s all a far cry from the jittery excitement of the first couple albums, but it&#8217;s exactly the direction the band had to go in; you can&#8217;t sustain something like that. As members have come and gone, the band has pushed lead singer Gareth more into the foreground, and this album is more personal and confident for it. The guy&#8217;s pretty good at this.</p>
<p>The rest of the band is still great, of course. There&#8217;s plenty to love here for fans of guitars, female backup vocals and more guitars. Yeah, the band&#8217;s a little less expansive then it used to be, and you can hear it on this record. However, this is still unmistakably Los Campesinos; the songs still build to amazing highs from humble lows. They&#8217;re still a delight to listen to. Or maybe I should say, they&#8217;re a delight to listen to again.</p>
<p><strong>Favorite Tracks:</strong> &#8220;By Your Hand,&#8221; &#8220;Every Defeat is a Divorce (Three Lions),&#8221; &#8220;The Black Bird, The Dark Slope&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4111</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Descent Into Sadness</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4090</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4090#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 05:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Descendants I can&#8217;t really think of many directors who could possibly get me more excited for one of their releases than Alexander Payne.  Maybe it&#8217;s a bit strange to get excited for a guy who&#8217;s made a career for himself by directing low-key, character-driven drama/comedies, but the guy&#8217;s style really works for me.  Then [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/descendants.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><em>The Descendants</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>I can&#8217;t really think of many directors who could possibly get me more excited for one of their releases than Alexander Payne.  Maybe it&#8217;s a bit strange to get excited for a guy who&#8217;s made a career for himself by directing low-key, character-driven drama/comedies, but the guy&#8217;s style really works for me.  Then on top of that, it&#8217;s been seven years since he released his last film <em>Sideways</em>, a gap in which Terrence Malick has released not one, but two films.  So after such a long absence, it&#8217;s a small wonder seeing how his latest film <em>The Descendants</em> provides us with another small, human story, starring the always dependable George Clooney.</p>
<p><span id="more-4090"></span></p>
<p>Clooney stars as Matt King, a Hawaiian land baron who&#8217;s wife has been in a coma caused by a boating accident.  Through some fairly expository voice-over that takes up the early moments of the film, we learn that Matt is unqualified to take care of his daughters without his wife around.  Matt then is given the news that his wife won&#8217;t be waking out of her coma, and Matt decides to go around the islands of Hawaii making peace with his wife&#8217;s family members by telling them of her unpleasant fate.  Matt gets another blow to his fragile state of mind when his daughter Alex reveals that his wife had been cheating with him.  Then from there, Matt sets out with his daughters to make peace with his wife&#8217;s inevitable passing, while also hoping to track down the man that his wife cheated on him with.</p>
<p>Oddly enough, the script was adapted from Kaui Hart Hemmings&#8217; novel by Payne along with Jim Rash and Nat Faxon, two guys that seem to show up quite often as bit players in comedy films or TV series.  I guess this is strange to me not only because these guys aren&#8217;t seasoned screenwriters, but also because the film often shies away from comedy and instead is more interested in the emotions that family members are faced with when confronted with death.  Yet despite this more somber tone, Payne is still willing to take on this subject matter with a lighter touch, often mixing in a few laughs to go along with all the grief and heartbreak that the film encompasses.</p>
<p>I remember seeing Alexander Payne in a recent interview saying that he was attracted most to The Descendants because he had never seen Hawaii portrayed in a film before.  At first I thought this couldn&#8217;t be true, but the more I thought of it, I agreed that Hawaii hadn&#8217;t really ever been the setting for a film that captured the islands in any sort of revelatory manner.  <em>The Descendants</em> sees Payne breezily capturing Hawaii with a surehanded amount of authenticity, giving us a Hawaii that&#8217;s less of a tropical paradise, and more of just another place where people live and die and complicate each other&#8217;s lives.</p>
<p>As for the performances, Clooney is really what guides the film, and though he doesn&#8217;t really show us any disarming new shades of his persona as an actor, there&#8217;s still a surprising amount of vulnarability that he displays.  The rest of the cast seems to be full of nothing but surprises, as performers like Judy Greer and Matthew Lillard get the chance to take on the kind of emotional material that you probably wouldn&#8217;t expect from them, while Shaillene Woodley is another stand out as Clooney&#8217;s troubled daughter.</p>
<p>I guess I was probably expecting a more comedically satisfying film from the man who brought us <em>Election</em> and <em>Sideways</em>, but honestly I can&#8217;t really complain when <em>The Descendants</em> covers such a wide range of emotions in such a mature and honest manner.  I&#8217;m just hoping I won&#8217;t have to wait another seven years to hear from a writer/director whose brand of modestly-budgetted indie dramadies seem to be becoming rarer and rarer these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4090</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Free as a Bird</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4084</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4084#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 20:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Noel Gallagher&#8217;s High Flying Birds &#8211; Noel Gallagher&#8217;s High Flying Birds Here I am living in a post-Oasis world now with two albums that are kind of like Oasis but still not Oasis. The first release was from Liam Gallagher&#8217;s new band Beady Eye (basically Oasis minus Noel) which sucked. Now we have Noel&#8217;s solo [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/noel_gallagher_high_flying_birds_album_cover_location_beverly_hills.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Noel Gallagher&#8217;s High Flying Birds &#8211; <em>Noel Gallagher&#8217;s High Flying Birds</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Here I am living in a post-Oasis world now with two albums that are kind of like <em>Oasis</em> but still not <em>Oasis</em>. The first release was from Liam Gallagher&#8217;s new band <em>Beady Eye</em> (basically <em>Oasis</em> minus Noel) which sucked. Now we have Noel&#8217;s solo venture which although much better is still nothing compared to his work with the group that put him on the map. Noel&#8217;s new album (recorded primarily by himself) is produced marvelously with some pleasing sounds and moments, but the songs are fairly forgettable. His songwriting seemed in as good as form as ever on the last <em>Oasis</em> album, so maybe he really does need Liam to make it all work?</p>
<p>Most of these songs sound more like <em>Oasis</em> b-sides than anything else which is fine just not particularly exciting. The songs are lush, big, and drenched in reverb with some really beautiful instrumentation but it never amounts to anything notable. There are no big hooks or catchy chorus lines it&#8217;s all just a rambling collection of very average progressions. If you were to strip these songs down they wouldn&#8217;t even be worth talking about, but Noel&#8217;s lucky to have a talented producer like Dave Sardy.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d comment on individual tracks if I could separate them in my mind,,&#8221;The Death of You and Me&#8221; is the only song I can ever clearly remember and it&#8217;s nice enough. Looking past the so-so compositions Noel is definitely gifted at creating a mood. Not to get all mushy but he really does put genuine emotion into his songwriting and performance, more so than Liam with <em>Beady Eyes</em> and it shows. Now that this has been released I&#8217;m just counting down to the big <em>Oasis</em> reunion. I&#8217;m positive that it&#8217;ll happen someday, they may hate each other but they are brothers. The only question is how long could it take for a reunion to happen? I for one can wait, give them time to cool off and come back with some better music than what they&#8217;ve given us on these two post-Oasis albums.</p>
<p><strong>Favorite Tracks:</strong> &#8220;The Death of You and Me&#8221;, &#8220;(I Wanna Live in a Dream in My) Record Machine&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4084</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Immortal Kombat</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4077</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4077#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 20:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Immortals Last year I went and saw Clash of Titans and liked it which probably made me one of five people who actually liked it. I suppose I have a genuine love for Greek Mythology so I get excited simply seeing it attempted on screen, or so I thought. In my original review of Clash [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/immortals_2011_5540_poster.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span style="font-size: x-large;"><em>Immortals</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/2.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Last year I went and saw <em>Clash of Titans</em> and liked it which probably made me one of five people who actually liked it. I suppose I have a genuine love for Greek Mythology so I get excited simply seeing it attempted on screen, or so I thought. In my original review of <em>Clash</em> I stated that I&#8217;d enjoy seeing a different character attempted on screen. My suggestions were either Bellophron or the story of Theseus and look now, it&#8217;s a little over a year and what we do have? A movie about Theseus… And it sucks. Why did someone like me who so closely follows reviews go see a panned movie? Once again I have a genuine love for the genre, plus Jon and I made a vow that we&#8217;d go see it… No matter what!</p>
<p>Going in I wasn&#8217;t very familiar with the story of Theseus aside from him defeating the Minotaur in the labyrinth so I can&#8217;t really vouch for how closely this follows the actual myth, though I&#8217;ll assume not very. Even reading up on Wikipedia I can see some glaring errors just in how the film handled it&#8217;s villain Hyperion (Mickey Rourke). Hyperion is portrayed in the film as a mortal king when in the myths he was a Titan, which means he in no way resembles his mythological counterpart. I could probably find holes like that &#8217;till the hydra comes home but I&#8217;ll try and concentrate only on what is presented on screen and not any outside information.</p>
<p><span id="more-4077"></span></p>
<p>After the god&#8217;s have failed to answer his prayers King Hyperion of Crete has declared war on Greece. Though in order to cement his success Hyperion needs to find a powerful weapon called the Epirus Bow. Once in possession of the bow Hyperion will be able to use it&#8217;s power to unleash the seal of the Titans and release them from Tartarus releasing utter chaos. Along his rampage Hyperion kidnaps the virgin oracle Phaedra (Frieda Pinto) to aid him, though I&#8217;m not sure what he&#8217;s trying to use her for. We learn she can see brief glimpses of the future but I&#8217;m not sure how it is exactly supposed to help. So she can like look further into the movie to a place they haven&#8217;t been yet to help them find something? It&#8217;s difficult to wrap the mind around not only because it&#8217;s so complicated but because it&#8217;s so incredibly stupid. Wrapped up in all this nonsense is our hero Theseus (Henry Cavill) a peasant and demi-god who swears vengeance on Hyperion after his village is destroyed and his mother killed. Theseus is a brave and gifted warrior who has been extensively trained by an old man (John Hurt) who is secretly Zeus (Luke Evans). So eventually Theseus saves Phaedra and teams up with her and Stephen Dorf in an attempt to seize the Epirus bow and secure the safety of Greece.</p>
<p>The plot sounds easy enough but is handled in a very sloppy manner. Characters we don&#8217;t know well, specifically the god&#8217;s jump in and out of the film for reasons that are never clear. Though what really tried my patience was the gods actions and their exact motivations. Zeus wants Theseus to defeat Hyperion in order to save Greece yet he refuses to physically fight Hyperion&#8217;s army, okay fine he is a god. But he will fight if Hyperion releases the Titans who have the potential to throw everything into peril if they escape Tartarus? Hmm, then wouldn&#8217;t it be more logical to simply kill Hyperion than risk him unleashing something a million times worse? So the gods can only interfere when the Titans are released but why is that exactly? A clear explanation is never given of the god&#8217;s role in this world and I was just plain confused. Sure they drew this from greek myth, which kind of predate good story structure, so it&#8217;s not entirely their fault but it&#8217;s the 21st century now and I can&#8217;t buy plot holes just because someone was too lazy to come up with some answers. Though if there&#8217;s one thing that really pisses me off it&#8217;s that they got rid of the freakin&#8217; labyrinth and the freaking &#8216;Minotaur! The two cool things about Theseus have now been reduced to a single scene where Theseus fights some guy in a bull costume in some small room. Later the event is interpreted by the peasants as a man who fought a minotaur but why couldn&#8217;t it just be a minotaur to start with? Like it&#8217;s that hard to buy that a minotaur exists when you have gods flying around everywhere.</p>
<p>On the positive side this movie looks stunning. Like Roger Ebert said, &#8220;It&#8217;s the best looking bad movie I&#8217;ve ever seen&#8221; and that sounds about right. Tarsem has already proven himself to be a great visionary when it comes to treating the screen like a canvas, if only he knew how to tell a proper story. The effects are as well marvelous and the gory fights are all worth praise. Wrapping it up this movie looks great but is not good so it kind of evens out to a so-so mish mash, maybe you should rent it but don&#8217;t rush out to see it in theaters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4077</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whovember: Nancy&#8217;s Top Ten</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4060</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4060#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 07:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Ten]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4060</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Almost totally forgot to do this. Wah-oh. I went through a pretty big Who phase back in the day and definitely consider myself a Who-er on the Who/Zeppelin debate. Not that I ever thought that debate was intelligent. This was fun considering I haven&#8217;t really visited my who collection in quite a while. 10. The Real Me [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/who1.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><p>Almost totally forgot to do this. Wah-oh. I went through a pretty big Who phase back in the day and definitely consider myself a Who-er on the Who/Zeppelin debate. Not that I ever thought that debate was intelligent. This was fun considering I haven&#8217;t really visited my who collection in quite a while.</p>
<p><span id="more-4060"></span></p>
<p><strong>10. The Real Me</strong><br />
I didn&#8217;t really know about Quadrophenia until pretty late into my Who career. Just remember Listening to The Real Me with Colin after he bought it and I was all about the horns. It&#8217;s always a treat when you think you know everything about a band, and then BAM, here&#8217;s some more awesome stuff.</p>
<p><strong>9. Subsitute</strong><br />
I have a real soft spot for older Who stuff. I feel like Pete Townsend saying, &#8220;Hey, let&#8217;s try to write hella poppy shit so we can get famous, then blow everyone&#8217;s mind.&#8221; Not only did he accomplish that, but wrote some really catchy songs along the way.</p>
<p><strong>8. My Wife</strong><br />
Another thing I was ALL about back then was non-lead singers singing lead. Also I love that scene from the Kids are Alright when he&#8217;s shooting those records. That was bad ass. And those trombones! Also bad ass.</p>
<p><strong>7. Amazing Journey</strong><br />
Amazing Journey is the song I most associate with Tommy for some reason. I think it&#8217;s because it embodies the whole &#8220;concept&#8221; or &#8220;opera&#8221; feel. It&#8217;s the first time on the album that I really feel like I&#8217;m listening to a story.</p>
<p><strong>6. Can&#8217;t Explain</strong><br />
Just another one of those poppy classics. I always used to wonder if Keith Moon HATED these songs. He was basically required keep it relatively simple, but you can definitely here his angst and aggression when listening to those early songs. He some how was able to convey that attitude but still keeping it cool for the sound they were going for.</p>
<p><strong>5. Pinball Wizard</strong><br />
Of course, I always have a soft spot for songs the Defenestrators played. No matter what tempo Max started us at&#8230;it was not fast enough. Actually listening to it now, it&#8217;s kind of embarrassing how fast we played it. Oh well.</p>
<p><strong>4. Won&#8217;t Get Fooled Again</strong><br />
This was originally around 6ish on my list. And then I listened to it again and was like, &#8220;Aw hell nah.&#8221; Something I like to think the kids say when they watch A New Hope. Then they go back to watching the new episode of Clone Wars.</p>
<p><strong>3. The Kids Are Alright</strong><br />
By far one of the coolest openings to a song in my humble opinion. I&#8217;m sucker for nice sounding pop harmony. So catchy. So damn catchy. But he&#8217;s gotta man up and tell all these asshole friends of his to stop dancing with his woman. He&#8217;s gonna go out of his mind! If you ask me that sounds dangerous.</p>
<p><strong>2. Behind Blue Eyes (Limp Bizkit version)</strong><br />
Syke. They don&#8217;t even get to the part that rocks. I&#8217;d love to see a sweet rap metal version of that part. Wouldn&#8217;t that rock? Can you tell I&#8217;m running out of things to talk about? Anyways, I always really liked this song just from just the dynamic point of view. So soft, then just a massive Moon fill, and then my favorite part of Who&#8217;s Next.</p>
<p><strong>1. Christmas</strong><br />
I feel like this might be controversial, but this really is my favorite Who song. I used to listen to all of Tommy just to hear this song. Sometimes I&#8217;d feel like listening to Tommy, so I&#8217;d start the album, listen to a few songs, then skip to Christmas and listen to it like eight times in a row. I love when songs don&#8217;t have intros. It&#8217;s just right into the song with one of my favorite melodies in rock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4060</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whovember: Colin&#8217;s Top Ten</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4031</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4031#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Ten]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know this is completely coincidental, but this week actually turned out to be a pretty good one to do Whovember, since it marked the release of the Quadrophenia Deluxe Edition reissue, so that&#8217;s something.  Anyways, The Who are probably my favorite band of all time, so doing a list like this certainly wasn&#8217;t easy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/the-who.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><p>I know this is completely coincidental, but this week actually turned out to be a pretty good one to do Whovember, since it marked the release of the <em>Quadrophenia Deluxe Edition</em> reissue, so that&#8217;s something.  Anyways, The Who are probably my favorite band of all time, so doing a list like this certainly wasn&#8217;t easy considering how deep The Who&#8217;s discography is in terms of quality.  So I kind of just tried not to over think it too much.</p>
<p><span id="more-4031"></span></p>
<p><strong><!--more-->10. The Song Is Over</strong><br />
<em>Who&#8217;s Next</em> is such an all out powerhouse of an album that it&#8217;s easy to take for granted some of the less well-known songs.  At least that&#8217;s how &#8220;The Song Is Over&#8221; was for me, since I didn&#8217;t really start to feel a real affinity for it until I was listening to <em>Who&#8217;s Next</em> for that CAT I did earlier this year.  I&#8217;m not sure if the phrase &#8220;The Song Is Over&#8221; is supposed to be any sort of metaphor for the end of the &#8217;60s, but that&#8217;s kind of the vibe I get from the song, whether it is or isn&#8217;t.</p>
<p><strong>9. We&#8217;re Not Gonna Take It</strong><br />
I felt like I should represent <em>Tommy</em> in one form or another, and what better way to do it than with the album&#8217;s triumphant finale?  The song seems to be a blatant kiss-off to this spiritual togetherness that seemed to bring people together at the tail end of the &#8217;60s, and obviously The Who weren&#8217;t a band that were gonna take any of that.  Yet the song still manages to end <em>Tommy</em> on an optimistic note with that great sing along that slowly fades into silence.</p>
<p><strong>8. Pictures Of Lily</strong><br />
You can see that from the start Pete Townsend was always interested in telling stories in his songs, which often resulted in these strange little odysseys that focused on frustrated teenage youths such as &#8220;Substitute&#8221; and &#8220;I&#8217;m A Boy&#8221;.  &#8221;Pictures Of Lily&#8221; takes on the tried and true subject of teenage masturbation, but from listening to the song&#8217;s sweet and innocent nature you&#8217;d never know.</p>
<p><strong>7. Sea And Sand</strong><br />
For me, <em>Quadrophenia</em>&#8216;s kind of like <em>The Dark Knight</em> of rock albums.  It&#8217;s long and messy and features a few too many subplots, but I&#8217;ll damned if each listen to it doesn&#8217;t leave me thoroughly captivated.  &#8221;Sea And Sand&#8221; is a pretty good example of the album&#8217;s emotionally charged nature, often going from heartfelt to lound and angry in a matter of seconds without missing a beat.</p>
<p><strong>6. The Kids Are Alright</strong><br />
The Who were certainly known for their loud and raucous nature in their early days, but you can see in a song like this that Pete Townshend has always had a softer side to his songwriting.  Yet even though the song does delve into more poppy teritory, you still have to admire the way The Who could just let Townshend ring out the same chord repeatedly while Keith Moon just goes nuts on the drums and somehow it&#8217;s really damn compelling.</p>
<p><strong>5. I Can See For Miles</strong><br />
The story goes that Pete Townshend was so discouraged by the modest success of the single &#8220;I Can See For Miles&#8221; that he turned to making the rock opera <em>Tommy</em>, because he didn&#8217;t think he could ever make a better Who single than &#8220;I Can See For Miles&#8221;.  I can kind of see where he was coming from since there aren&#8217;t many songs that represent the powerful nature of The Who&#8217;s sound so well.  I mean just listen to all those different guitar parts, it&#8217;s almost like a symphony of wailing six-strings that don&#8217;t seem to have any intention of letting up.</p>
<p><strong>4. I Can&#8217;t Explain</strong><br />
This really is just kind of a perfect pop record.  From that first spikey guitar chord, you can&#8217;t help but be hooked in, and then when Moon&#8217;s stuttering drum pattern comes in it&#8217;s hard to imagine things getting any better.  And then somehow they do!  Even in this early single you see Townshend&#8217;s uncanny ability to see things through the eyes of teenage weirdos and misfits, and I just can&#8217;t think of a song that gives you more bang for your buck in a mere 2 minutes.</p>
<p><strong>3. So Sad About Us</strong><br />
So yeah, I really like the jangly pop songs of The Who&#8217;s mid-to-late &#8217;60s period, as the band displayed an uncanny ability for soaring melodies and surprisingly affecting vocal harmonies.  I guess it&#8217;s just nice to hear a band that could rock the fuck out while still sounding as hopelessly romantic as they do on &#8220;So Sad About Us&#8221;.  It&#8217;s just too bad John can&#8217;t help but feel sick to his stomach every time he hears this song.</p>
<p><strong>2. Baba O&#8217;Riley</strong><br />
So I guess this is like the &#8220;Over The Hills And Far Away&#8221; of Who songs.  I, like Sean and John, also happen to be pretty captivated by that intro.  I mean when you hear that beautiful synth line juxtaposed against those simple but powerful piano chords, well that&#8217;s just some magical shit.  Also there&#8217;s that sweet Irish jig at the end, which isn&#8217;t something you hear in most Who songs, or any for that matter.</p>
<p><strong>1. A Quick One, While He&#8217;s Away (Live Version)</strong><br />
If I could define what made The Who a great band, it&#8217;d come down to two things: Pete Townshend&#8217;s incredible creative vision as a songwriter, and the band&#8217;s explosive energy as a live band.  So &#8220;A Quick One, While He&#8217;s Away&#8221; pretty much sums up both of those, as it&#8217;s this charming little story (sometimes reffered to as &#8220;the mini opera&#8221;) that&#8217;s made up of these smaller little songs that make up this grander thing.  I&#8217;m fine with the studio version, but this song really turned into something spectacular when the band played it live, and I can&#8217;t really decide on a definitive version of the song, as the <em>Live At Leeds</em> version is amazing, but I also have a soft spot for the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C1ku7QNRudg">version from The Rolling Stones&#8217; Rock N&#8217; Roll Circus</a>.  Either way it&#8217;s a song I love from a band that&#8217;s created a lot of songs I love, and will no doubt continue to love for as long as I&#8217;m listening to music.</p>
<p>Oh, and John Entwistle is the greatest bass player ever.  Forgot to mention that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4031</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whovember: Sean&#8217;s Top Ten</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3957</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3957#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Ten]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems like Zeptember was just the other day, but here we are, in the midst of another theme week. I don&#8217;t understand the Led Zeppelin/Who rivalry, or why battle lines where drawn there, but having done this for both bands, I think Zeppelin wins. Narrowly, because while they have more songs I feel strongly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Who_-_1975.jpeg" width="240" />
		</p><p>It seems like Zeptember was just the other day, but here we are, in the midst of another theme week. I don&#8217;t understand the Led Zeppelin/Who rivalry, or why battle lines where drawn there, but having done this for both bands, I think Zeppelin wins. Narrowly, because while they have more songs I feel strongly about, The Who put out a lot, and a mean a lot, of songs I really like. Plus, you&#8217;ve got to admit, they&#8217;re the cooler band.</p>
<p><span id="more-3957"></span></p>
<p><strong>10. Happy Jack</strong><br />
See, I told you they were cool. What can I say, I like how unabashedly upbeat a song this is. Those kids just can&#8217;t keep Jack down. This song also builds to a satisfying crescendo, which has got to count for something. There are other songs I could have chosen the perhaps rock a lot more, but nothing has the unique charm of &#8220;Happy Jack.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>9. Pinball Wizard</strong><br />
Ever since I was a young boy, I liked this song. Back in the day, I was all about <em>Tommy</em>, it was probably my favorite album from The Who. This is my favorite song off of that album, and only partly because its slightly related to video games. Mostly it&#8217;s the guitar. And the weirdness of a deaf, dumb and blind kid being good at pinball. That&#8217;s some magic.</p>
<p><strong>8. My Generation</strong><br />
This is kind of the signature Who song, and with good reason. It rocks. Although I never understood the stutter. What&#8217;s up with that? I heard it had to do with drugs or something. Whatever. Also, do they still perform this? It&#8217;s gotta be weird when they sing &#8220;hope I die before I get old&#8221; at this point.</p>
<p><strong>7. Magic Bus</strong><br />
The Bo Diddley Beat is a pretty cool thing, anyone who&#8217;s ever heard the Sam Adams commercial song knows that. &#8220;Magic Bus&#8221; is a great example of that, one of the jammier songs in the Who catalogue. Plus, I appreciate the dedication of riding a bus every day to see the girl you love, and going as far as to actually buy the bus. Love, man.</p>
<p><strong>6. The Seeker</strong><br />
What is he looking for? I never paid that much attention, since this is another song that had me focused on the guitar. There&#8217;s a lot going on that front. Also, I like it when I really like a song that the band itself seems not that about, as the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Seeker_(song)">Wikipedia article</a> suggests Pete Townshend&#8217;s not the biggest fan.</p>
<p><strong>5. I Can See for Miles</strong><br />
An oddly heavy song, &#8220;I Can See for Miles&#8221; is said to have inspired, slightly, &#8220;Helter Skelter.&#8221; But you know what&#8217;s really inspiring. Those harmonies. If only we could tap into that kind of beauty in <em>Rock Band 3</em>. And then that dopey part at the end. The hell is that? It&#8217;s funny.</p>
<p><strong>4. I Can&#8217;t Explain</strong><br />
Hey! Overlap! Allegedly Jimmy Page played the rhythm guitar on this song. And it&#8217;s vaguely Kinks-esque. So, in conclusion, this song is the sum total of rock and roll. Explaining further would betray the purpose of the song.</p>
<p><strong>3. Won&#8217;t Get Fooled Again</strong><br />
Yeah! Another song that is now inextricably linked to <em>Rock Band</em> and bad one liners. Ugh! That always happens to the best songs. As we watch the Occupy Wall Street movement try to orchestrate revolution, it&#8217;s easy to think of this song. Especially it&#8217;s most cynical message: &#8220;meet the new boss / same as the old boss.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>2. Who Are You</strong><br />
In my foolish youth, I thought this song was only as good as that first part. Now I know better. Now I know each and every part of &#8220;Who Are You&#8221; is a special treat meant to be savored and enjoyed. A strange tale about waking up in a bar, that&#8217;s apparently basded on a true story. Plus, he says &#8220;fuck&#8221; and apparently they played that on the radio all the time back in the day. Sure, it&#8217;s not <em>Tropic Thunder</em>, but that&#8217;s still pretty great. Remember that part on <em>Louie</em>? Hilarious!</p>
<p><strong>1. Baba O&#8217;Riley</strong><br />
That&#8217;s right, my top three is the <em>CSI</em> trilogy. I can&#8217;t help it, they chose the right songs. Look, there are a lot of songs on this list that have the amazing quality of getting me excited to hear them after just the first few seconds. But only &#8220;Baba O&#8217;Riley&#8221; builds that excitement for like 45 seconds, making the pay off oh so satisfying. Sure, the song has <em>Bug&#8217;s Life</em> taint on it, move on. It&#8217;s like the best song.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3957</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whovember: John&#8217;s Top Ten</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4003</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4003#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Ten]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=4003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was a late bloomer when it came to listening to The Who. I didn&#8217;t become truly interested in the band until high school but when it hit me it hit me hard and now I&#8217;m doing this list. I&#8217;d heard most of Who&#8217;s Next but my first copy, which was burned from somewhere was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/who.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><p>I was a late bloomer when it came to listening to <i>The Who</I>. I didn&#8217;t become truly interested in the band until high school but when it hit me it hit me hard and now I&#8217;m doing this list. I&#8217;d heard most of <i>Who&#8217;s Next</I> but my first copy, which was burned from somewhere was always messed up so I was always too frustrated to finish it. To this day whenever I hear the songs &#8220;This Song is Over&#8221; and &#8220;Getting in Tune&#8221; I just keep waiting for the tracks to start skipping. So my education of <i>The Who</I> primarily came from two other places. The first was the 1979 rockumentary <i>The Kids Are Alright</I> and the second was the massive <i>Who</I> box set I got for christmas <i>The Who: 30 Years of Maximum R&#038;B</I>. No doubt an unorthodox introduction to the band but it gave me a great deal of respect for the group&#8217;s entire body of work. From that box set I heard dozens of <i>Who</i> b-sides and rarities that most people probably  aren&#8217;t familiar with, so I like to think I have fairly good knowledge of the group&#8217;s music library, let&#8217;s begin.</p>
<p><span id="more-4003"></span></p>
<p><b>10. Pinball Wizard</b><br />
Any song that <i>The Defenestrators</I> have ever covered automatically has a place in my heart. I was always amazed when playing this song how much it accomplishes in just barely three minutes. You have that almost heroic intro followed by all out rock with such prowess and finesse.</p>
<p><b>9. Success Story</b><br />
I wanted to have at least one John Entwistle song represented and this one just edges out <i>My Wife</I> for my favorite Entwistle number. It&#8217;s your standard <i>Who</I> rocker with Roger and John singing about the path to becoming a rockstar. The attitude is fun, cheeky, and I loved it&#8217;s inclusion in the scene in <i>Kids Are Alright</I> when John goes out to shoot his golden records. </p>
<p><b>8. The Seeker</b><br />
I think this and &#8220;PInball Wizard&#8221; more or less cement Pete Townshend as the best or at least most unique rhythm guitar player in rock. Don&#8217;t get me wrong he can solo when he needs to, but the way he chugs along and bangs out chords is so expressive. &#8220;The Seeker&#8221; acts as a nice transition from the slightly more pop oriented <i>Who</I> of the late 60s to the hard rock of the early 70s, at least that&#8217;s the vibe I always get and I like it. </p>
<p><b>7. Eminence Front</b><br />
It&#8217;s funny, Roger Daltrey often refers to this song as the only song off of <i>it&#8217;s Hard</I> that&#8217;s any good and he&#8217;s probably right. This song is the kind of slick that embodies 80s cool, like Don Johnson cool. Listening to it I can imagine cruising through the city late at night or maybe just playing <i>San Andreas</I>. But the real question is why hasn&#8217;t this song been used as the theme to a stupid cop show yet?</p>
<p><b>6. Long Live Rock</b><br />
A lot of my love for <i>The Who</I> can be traced to the first time I saw <i>The Kids Are Alright</i> and if I recall correctly this song closed the film. Rock messages don&#8217;t get much simpler or better than a line like &#8220;Long Live Rock&#8221; and rock this song does. Pete takes the verse and Roger comes in screeching on the choruses to give an extra boost of pep. There&#8217;s not much to it, simply <i>The Who</I> doing what they do best. </p>
<p><b>5. Blue Red and Grey</b><br />
I didn&#8217;t realize how much I apparently liked Pete Townshend&#8217;s singing voice until I made this list, but seeing that he came in four times must mean he has some sort of magnetic pull towards my brain. It doesn&#8217;t get much sweeter than a song like &#8220;Blue, Red, and Grey&#8221; featuring Pete on ukulele and accompanied by a warm brass section. The presentation is gentle and beautifully optimistic with the repeating lyric &#8220;I like every minute of the day.&#8221; This is one of <i>The Who&#8217;s</i> most underrated slow songs on an album (1975&#8242;s <i>The Who By Numbers</I>) that I&#8217;ve always felt was equally underrated.</p>
<p><b>4. Zoot Suit</b><br />
Don&#8217;t feel bad if you don&#8217;t know this one it does require some explanation. Technically this was recorded by <i>The Who</I> while they were still known as <i>The High Numbers</I>. Maybe that&#8217;s controversial but this is still the same <i>Who</I>. I mean they only had that name for like a month and it&#8217;s all the same members and everything. I also think it&#8217;s important to recognize The Who&#8217;s &#8220;Mod Phase&#8221; as an important part of the group&#8217;s musical history. It was from this era that a great deal of the inspiration for Quadrophenia came. </p>
<p><b>3. Odorono</b><br />
Such a pleasing melody and tuneful guitar part, I like to think this song could have been a more popular track had it not been about deodorant, but I guess that&#8217;s what <i>The Who Sell Out</I> was all about. I love the quirky concept behind that album and this my favorite of many offbeat gems from that record. Not only is it catchy but it&#8217;s a funny little song as well. </p>
<p><b>2. Baba O&#8217;Riley</b><br />
I still don&#8217;t really understand how Pete Townshend managed to create such an awesome synth intro or whatever that is exactly. What I do know about that intro is that it is the greatest sound I have ever heard. That weird synth thing alone would nab it a spot on this list even if the song was only thirty seconds long, but wait there&#8217;s more! Roger Daltrey delivers some of his most passionate vocals as the backing instruments just build and build until it reaches that uproarious ending. </p>
<p><b>1. The Real Me</b><br />
I don&#8217;t think I have a favorite <i>Who</I> song really, but I have no problem putting this one at the front of the pack because it seems to embody everything that&#8217;s awesome about <i>The Who</I>. Rhythmically it has to be my favorite <i>Who</I> performance, definitely one of the most energetic. Keith&#8217;s drum fills are fuckin&#8217; insane! It&#8217;s like he&#8217;s been possessed by some kind of drum playing demon, and that bass part moves up and down the neck at such break neck pace, it&#8217;s masterful! Of course Roger is in fine  form as he howls along and Pete energetically bangs out chords. It&#8217;s a song that&#8217;s surprisingly catchy considering how loose and jam based the instrumentation is. When it all comes together with those horns on the chorus? That&#8217;s like rock and roll ecstasy plain and simple… Though what exactly that means I can&#8217;t explain.</p>
<p><b>Honorabe Mention</b><br />
Bargain<br />
My Wife<br />
Join Together</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4003</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Welcome to Whovember</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3968</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3968#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Considering how much fun we had with our Zeppelin themed &#8220;Zeptember&#8221; week we here at Mildly Pleased have decided to do another rock iinfused, pun-inspired, theme week with &#8220;Whovember&#8221;. We all love The Who here at the blog at least to some extent, so it&#8217;ll be exciting to see why that is. In the same [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/whovember11.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><p>Considering how much fun we had with our Zeppelin themed &#8220;Zeptember&#8221; week we here at Mildly Pleased have decided to do another rock iinfused, pun-inspired, theme week with &#8220;Whovember&#8221;. We all love <em>The Who</em> here at the blog at least to some extent, so it&#8217;ll be exciting to see why that is. In the same style as &#8220;Zeptember&#8221; we&#8217;ll countdown our personal favorite songs throughout the week.</p>
<p>For the sake of consistency we&#8217;ll follow the same order as our last theme week.</p>
<p>- Tuesday: John&#8217;s Top Ten Who Songs<br />
- Wednesday: Sean&#8217;s Top Ten Who Songs<br />
- Thursday: Colin&#8217;s Top Ten Who Songs<br />
- Friday: Nancy&#8217;s Top Ten Who Songs<br />
- Saturday: Kevin&#8217;s Top Ten Who Songs</p>
<p>Hopefully this will all join together and we&#8217;ll be posting up a storm anyway, anyhow, and anywhere, if that makes any sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3968</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trouble Comes Calling</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3939</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3939#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 05:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 Do you still like Call of Duty? I don&#8217;t mean the WWII shooters that started the franchise, I mean the multiplayer-focused more modern ones that have become as akin to November as the Saw film series was to Halloween. Every year, since 2007, we&#8217;ve gotten the latest entry in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/mw3.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><em>Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Do you still like <em>Call of Duty</em>? I don&#8217;t mean the WWII shooters that started the franchise, I mean the multiplayer-focused more modern ones that have become as akin to November as the <em>Saw</em> film series was to Halloween. Every year, since 2007, we&#8217;ve gotten the latest entry in the series, and it hasn&#8217;t really evolved. It hasn&#8217;t needed to. Last year&#8217;s <em>Black Ops</em> is the best selling game ever. For better or for worse, the <em>Call of Duty</em> franchise is the dominant one for the medium, and the <em>Modern Warfare</em> games define it.</p>
<p><span id="more-3939"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3942" rel="attachment wp-att-3942"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/1320185025440-479x269.jpg" alt="" title="1320185025440" width="479" height="269" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-3942" /></a></p>
<p>Picking up where <em>Modern Warfare 2</em>, the campaign basically explodes at you non-stop for 5 hours. Everything was as you left it: Price, Soap and Nikolai are hunting Makarov, the evil Russian who forced the USA and Russia into war. Soap is still really badly injured, Price is still really pissed, Makarov still has a really distinct, evil voice. As is always the case, you&#8217;ll play as a few soldiers all over the world, getting to see the fight from our disavowed heroes&#8217; POV as well as visit the front as Americans and good Russians.</p>
<p><em>Modern Warfare</em> campaigns were never very long, but I was done with this one in four and a half hours. Two sittings. That&#8217;s not a lot of time. But, when you consider that Infinity Ward basically imploded during this game&#8217;s development, it&#8217;s obvious that something had to give. Most every level feels short, but the story is full of pretty crazy moments that culminates in a very finite conclusion. It&#8217;s hard to imagine them calling a game Modern Ware 4, since Infinity Ward is such a different company now, so it&#8217;s nice to get a clean break.</p>
<p>In comparing <em>Modern Warfare 3</em>&#8216;s campaign to <em>Battlefield 3</em>&#8216;s, it&#8217;s a little difficult to qualify why <em>Call of Duty </em>is better. I guess in part it&#8217;s because this game is so over-the-top. While <em>Battlefield 3</em> made a big show of knocking down a building, in <em>Modern Warfare 3</em>, the Eiffel Tower will get totally unnecessarily toppled right in front of you. While it does have its fair share of turret sequences, they&#8217;re generally more entertaining simply because more craziness is going on. Gunfights are just as clearly linear, but that&#8217;s really not the issue with either game.</p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3943" rel="attachment wp-att-3943"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/1320188710225-479x268.jpg" alt="" title="1320188710225" width="479" height="268" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-3943" /></a></p>
<p>There are plenty of people who probably never even played the <em>Modern Warfare</em> campaigns. For them, these games live and die by their multiplayer. And, once again, not much has changed. Gone is everything that <em>Black Ops</em> did, this one is basically identical to <em>Modern Warfare 2</em>. The most meaningful evolution is the way streaks work. Now called pointstreaks, you&#8217;ll earn credit for objective now, instead of just kills. You get to choose a &#8220;strike package,&#8221; which alters what kind of streaks you can get. The classic style is the assault package. With the support package, your streak continues even when you die, but as a result, your perks are more defensive. The specialist package has to do with consecutive kills and rewards you with perks. It&#8217;s a great new system that helps lesser players, like myself.</p>
<p>In a great move, the zombies mode is gone and Spec Ops is back. Spec Ops was probably the best part of <em>Modern Warfare 2</em>, giving players fun two-player missions to complete together. It&#8217;s just as fun this time around, although keeping it limited to two players was a mistake. This stuff is really good, let me play it with all my friends! The more the merrier, as they say. They, being my cold-blooded killer, Call of Duty-playing friends.</p>
<p>So do you still like <em>Call of Duty</em>? There&#8217;s two ways you can answer and either is fine. If you like &#8216;em, good on you, here&#8217;s some more of that. If you don&#8217;t, if you&#8217;ve been fatigued by the series lack of progress bigger than the occasional baby step, well, at least this presents you an opportunity to put an end to the story that started five years ago. If you even care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3939</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Someone Find Them a Chart</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3926</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3926#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 04:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Uncharted 3: Drake&#8217;s Deception One of the seemingly endless stream of &#8220;threes&#8221; coming to gaming the last few months, Uncharted 3 had the odds stacked against it. After all, while the first game in the series was commendable, it wasn&#8217;t especially remarkable. So when that second game came out and basically defined the cinematic gaming [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/uncharted3.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><em>Uncharted 3: Drake&#8217;s Deception</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.5.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>One of the seemingly endless stream of &#8220;threes&#8221; coming to gaming the last few months, <em>Uncharted 3</em> had the odds stacked against it. After all, while the first game in the series was commendable, it wasn&#8217;t especially remarkable. So when that second game came out and basically defined the cinematic gaming experience, it raised expectations considerably higher for the third part of the trilogy. After all, how do you top one of the greatest games of the current generation?</p>
<p><span id="more-3926"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3933" rel="attachment wp-att-3933"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/5628340547_d1b85cf1d0-479x269.jpg" alt="" title="5628340547_d1b85cf1d0" width="479" height="269" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-3933" /></a></p>
<p>You don&#8217;t. You just give us a lot more of it. If the first game was <em>Romancing the Stone</em> and the second was <em>Raiders of the Lost Ark</em>, this is <em>Last Crusade</em>. It&#8217;s a bit more of a family affair, focusing on the relationship between Drake and Sully, something I imagine a lot of fans have been waiting for. <em>Drake&#8217;s Deception</em> digs deep into both of their pasts, while also digging up so more Sir Francis Drake and TE Lawrence history too.</p>
<p>Experiencing the story is the real joy of these games, so I won&#8217;t say too much. Everyone&#8217;s back. The gang is once again looking for a long lost city. Some bad people are coincidentally also looking for this long lost city. The quest takes Drake all around the globe and too a variety of locales. At this point, I think Naughty Dog is simply unmatched in their ability to craft environments, as we&#8217;ve not experienced basically every form of the outdoors through these games.</p>
<p>Probably the most poignant moment of the last game came at the end, when Lazarevic pointed out just how many people Drake killed over the course of the game. Of course, Nate just kind of brushed that off, because, damn, that&#8217;s some shit. I don&#8217;t know how you answer that. Similarly, this game asks the question why Drake and Sully go on these quests, since they&#8217;re often so dangerous and rarely pay off for them. It&#8217;s another great question and its handled a lot better this time around. In fact, I think the story as a whole is better this time, simply because it gave me the maximum opportunity to spend time with characters I already love.</p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3936" rel="attachment wp-att-3936"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/5318791545_45df03718f-479x269.jpg" alt="" title="5318791545_45df03718f" width="479" height="269" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-3936" /></a></p>
<p>Gameplay wise, not much has changed. Shooting feels a little more magnetic, I think the aim assist has been made a little more generous. The game is still the best on the market when it comes to throwing grenades, and the motion sensitivity of it is disabled by default now. Hand-to-hand combat is a bigger component this time around, and it&#8217;s definitely learned a little from <em>Arkham Asylum</em>, feeling more reactionary while still maintaining its button-mashing roots.</p>
<p>The multiplayer suite is great, as anyone who went to Subway in the last month already knows. The coop missions provide fun little &#8220;What If&#8221; stories and it&#8217;s just great to play this kind of game with other people. The competitive modes are solid, though I&#8217;m not sure they&#8217;re the kind of thing I&#8217;ll be returning to, even a few weeks from now.</p>
<p>The set pieces do their best to step up from what <em>Uncharted 2</em> did. Naughty Dog clearly spent a long time developing wave technology, because the levels that take place at sea are pretty extraordinary and possibly even sea sickness-inducing. Similarly, a sequence in the desert is pretty amazing, especially because it takes place entirely in gameplay. There&#8217;s plenty more that I&#8217;d love to spoil for you, but I probably shouldn&#8217;t. Just know that this game really steps it up.</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s not really enough just to be iterative. <em>Uncharted 3</em> does some really amazing things, but I expected it to do that. Because my mind was already blown by the last game, it could not be blown again by this game doing similar things. I know that sounds stupid, but when your game is this good, those intangible feelings become more pronounced.</p>
<p><em>Uncharted 3</em> will forever live in <em>Uncharted 2</em>&#8216;s shadow. Maybe two years wasn&#8217;t long enough for another revolution. The next time, if there is a next time, hopefully they can change the world again. If not, well, this is still an amazing, otherwise unparalleled experience that makes me happy to own a PS3. That&#8217;s not bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3926</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hate is a Battlefield</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3864</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3864#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 04:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Battlefield 3 I was definitely on board with the Battlefield franchise as soon as I saw the first game, 1942. It was the first time I ever played a conquest-style game like that before and it really impressed me. I&#8217;ve tried to stick with the series over the years, but I was hesitant to get involved in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/battlefield3.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><em>Battlefield 3</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/2.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>I was definitely on board with the <em>Battlefield</em> franchise as soon as I saw the first game, <em>1942</em>. It was the first time I ever played a conquest-style game like that before and it really impressed me. I&#8217;ve tried to stick with the series over the years, but I was hesitant to get involved in <em>Battlefield 2</em>, as it seemed like a departure from what I originally liked about the series. The <em>Bad Company </em>series kept the franchise relevant, but it had changed and adapted to the post-<em>Modern Warfare </em>world. I thought classic <em>Battlefield </em>was gone. And yet, <em>Battlefield 3 </em>is here, despite there being so many more games in the series than three.</p>
<p><span id="more-3864"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3906" rel="attachment wp-att-3906"><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-3906" title="Novac_656x369" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Novac_656x369-479x269.jpg" alt="" width="479" height="269" /></a></p>
<p>On Xbox 360, <em>Battlefield 3</em> ships on two discs. Disc One is the multiplayer, so you can tell that&#8217;s where this game&#8217;s loyalties lie. But I rented it, and the game requires an online pass, so I guess everything but the campaign is technically auxiliary to the experience. That&#8217;s not true, we all know it&#8217;s not true. However, since I wasn&#8217;t going to pay extra, it&#8217;s only the singeplayer you&#8217;re going to hear about. And it&#8217;s not really good. At all.</p>
<p>Campaigns are pretty new to the <em>Battlefield</em> franchise. I enjoyed the <em>Bad Company</em> stories because they were campy and fun, which sadly is not the direction <em>Battlefield 3</em> took. What we have here is a clear attempt to riff on the <em>Call of Duty</em> formula, specifically last year&#8217;s <em>Black Ops</em>. Like that game, this story is framed around the interrogation of Sgt. Blackburn, a marine who has been everywhere and done everything, but is stupidly being treated as a traitor. As he recounts his story, you play mainly through his exploits, although a couple missions will put you in the shoes of ancillary characters through a slim globetrotting adventure. The characters and the story aren&#8217;t that interesting and it all feels like a knock off.</p>
<p>Also like <em>Call of Duty</em>, <em>Battlefield 3</em> is a linear game. Extremely linear. Like the developers don&#8217;t really trust you to play the game linear. You walk down narrow paths, shooting the guys along the way. That&#8217;s if you&#8217;re lucky. It seems like half the time, they stick you on turrets and so all you can do it point and shoot while the game works itself out. This is a game that has playable jets, ones you can freely fly and fight in, in the multiplayer. In the campaign&#8217;s one flying mission, you&#8217;re forced to sit in the backseat and watch as the AI drives the fighter. Sure, you get to fire missiles, but it basically turns what could be a thrilling experience into a glorified quicktime event.</p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3921" rel="attachment wp-att-3921"><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-3921" title="BF3_tank_01_656x369" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/BF3_tank_01_656x369-479x269.jpg" alt="" width="479" height="269" /></a></p>
<p>All that said, at least that air combat segment is thrilling, at first. This is one of the most beautiful games I&#8217;ve ever seen. Technically speaking, that is. On the Xbox 360, you have to actually install the textures to your hard drive, I think an unprecedented move, but end result is a gorgeous game. When I walked up onto the deck of that aircraft carrier and took off, my pulse was pounding. If you saw that lengthy trailer of the game&#8217;s first mission, you know it looks great, even on consoles. I&#8217;m sure it would look better on PC.</p>
<p>It sounds great too. So often in games, your guns don&#8217;t sound as terrifying as they really are. Here they do. Remember that seen in <em>Heat</em>, the gunfight after the failed heist? The guns sound that good. And of course there are plenty of explosions to keep you busy as well. The set pieces just don&#8217;t live up to the game&#8217;s great sound and looks. Playing it isn&#8217;t as fun as you would think watching someone else play it.</p>
<p>But what&#8217;s most off about the game is that it doesn&#8217;t feel like <em>Battlefield</em>. These games are supposed to be crazy. Jets flying into tanks, walls exploding everywhere, unmitigated chaos, that&#8217;s what I&#8217;m looking for. So I&#8217;ll probably buy this game on the PC, head online and never look back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3864</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>C.A.T: They Might Be Giants</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3888</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3888#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 17:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They Might Be Giants &#8211; They Might Be Giants (1986) I was hoping we could start Whovember this week but I didn&#8217;t want to spring it on everyone without any announcement so it can wait another week, but beware you have no been warned! Anyways, Colin an I had a good run reviewing nine debut albums in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/183354_1_f2.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">They Might Be Giants &#8211; <em>They Might Be Giants</em> (1986)</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>I was hoping we could start Whovember this week but I didn&#8217;t want to spring it on everyone without any announcement so it can wait another week, but beware you have no been warned! Anyways, Colin an I had a good run reviewing nine debut albums in a row and although this is again a debut album it&#8217;s merely coincidental. I saw my opportunity to pay tribute to the cult kings of underground novelty pop and so here I am, presenting the 1986 debut album from Brooklyn duo <em>They Might Be Giants</em>. Comprised of vocalist/guitarist John Flansburgh and vocalist/multi instrumentalist (mostly accordion!) John Linnell, <em>They Might Be Giants</em> have had a prolific career producing a clever brand of offbeat pop and this is where it all began. Well actually the duo had recorded quite a bit of material before their actual first album. In the early 80s they created a service &#8220;Dial-A-Song&#8221; where you could dial a number to hear a song. Sounds bizarre but somehow it caught on and people started calling all these numbers to hear these novelty songs. This lead to <em>They Might Be Giants</em> recording at least 500 different songs before they were offered a record deal, wow, and this is their first record.</p>
<p><em>They Might Be Giants</em> is a difficult band to pin down regarding any kind of genre or subgenre. It&#8217;s unfair to call them a novelty even though they have recorded a lot of silly songs, but they definitely legitimate songwriters and have written some great pop rock songs. The tying theme behind all these varying numbers is the lyrical wordplay and unusual subjects the pair often sing about. Look at some of these titles; &#8220;Youth Culture Killed My Dog&#8221;, &#8220;Absolutely Bill&#8217;s Mood&#8221;, &#8220;Chess Piece Face&#8221; sometimes I have no idea what these guys are talking about but I enjoy the ride. The record is probably best known for <em>They Might Be Giants</em> first breakout single &#8220;Don&#8217;t Let&#8217;s Start.&#8221;</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a magnificent blend of different and diverse instruments on this album and both members blend their sounds together well. John Flansburgh&#8217;s guitar work has a funky rhythmic flair brimming with energy and John Linnell wows with his aptitude for a whole splendor of instruments with everything from saxophone, to keyboard, to his trademark accordion. Though both members share lead vocal duties Linnell has always seemed to have the most success with producing the band&#8217;s hits propelled by his quirky charismatic singing voice.</p>
<p>Growing up in the 90s I&#8217;ve always had a soft spot for <em>They Might Be Giants,</em> most notably when their songs &#8220;Particle Man&#8221; and &#8220;Istanbul (Not Constantinople)&#8221; were featured on <em>Tiny Toon Adventures</em>. As a matter of fact their album <em>Apollo 18</em> is one of their first cds I can clearly remember listening to. With that being said I suppose it&#8217;s not that surprising that the pair started recording educational children&#8217;s music for a little while in the mid 2000s, though I&#8217;m glad they&#8217;re back to their old ways now. This band really is the definition of &#8220;cult band&#8221; as they&#8217;ve somehow been successful but are still only known by a select few. All I know is that I like this album and I&#8217;m proud to be a part of that cult.</p>
<p><strong>Fun Fact:</strong> Last week&#8217;s CAT artist was <em>Husker Du</em>. Did you know that <em>The Daily Show</em> theme song &#8220;Dog on Fire&#8221; was written by <em>Husker Du</em> guitarist Bob Mould but was re-recorded by <em>They Might Be Giants</em> after Jon Stewart joined the show? It&#8217;s all connected man!</p>
<p><strong>Favorite Tracks:</strong> &#8220;Don&#8217;t Let&#8217;s Start&#8221;, &#8220;Hide Away Folk Family&#8221;, &#8220;She&#8217;s an Angel&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3888</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My Low Xylophone</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3619</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3619#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 17:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3619</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Coldplay &#8211; Mylo Xyloto When they were on The Colbert Report a little while ago, Coldplay frontman Chris Martin was asked about comparing his band to Radiohead. His reply? &#8220;They&#8217;re more talented musically, but we&#8217;re more handsome.&#8221; And that&#8217;s it, really. Radiohead has gone on to put out albums that challenge the music industry, genres and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Coldplay-Mylo-Xyloto.jpeg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Coldplay &#8211; <em>Mylo Xyloto</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>When they were on <em>The Colbert Report</em> a little while ago, Coldplay frontman Chris Martin was asked about comparing his band to Radiohead. His reply? &#8220;They&#8217;re more talented musically, but we&#8217;re more handsome.&#8221; And that&#8217;s it, really. Radiohead has gone on to put out albums that challenge the music industry, genres and even their fans. Coldplay made one Radiohead-esque album and then blew up to be one of the biggest bands in the world. And, in a year with new releases from bands like Radiohead and My Morning Jacket that require a little effort to get into, it&#8217;s nice to have something as easy as a new Coldplay album.</p>
<p>I know a lot of people really don&#8217;t like Chris Martin, but I appreciate the guy&#8217;s earnestness. When I read stuff like the album is inspired by old school American graffiti, the White Rose movement and <em>The Wire</em>, I pay it much mind. Similarly, I don&#8217;t spend much time paying attention to his lyrics about love and happiness and whatever. Let the man have his fun. He&#8217;s the headman of one of the biggest bands in the world. You should know the vibe Coldplay is going for already, don&#8217;t worry about the specifics.</p>
<p>The thing that stands out on <em>Mylo Xyloto</em> is the beats. I feel like the band really kicked up the bass and drums this time around, I mean, just listen to a song like &#8220;Paradise.&#8221; That shit is deep. Coldplay has definitely taken some inspiration from popular R&amp;B music, I mean they even got Rihanna to sing on a song. Which is perhaps not the direction I expected them to go in, after all I thought Jay-Z&#8217;s appearance on the last album more weird than cool, but I&#8217;ll allow it. This is a band that sells out stadiums, and that&#8217;s the kind of music that does the same.</p>
<p>In the end, the musicianship is as tight as ever, the songs as catchy. No, there&#8217;s absolutely no obvious breakouts this time, no &#8220;Fix You.&#8221; This is more a consistently solid, but never amazing, album. And yes, Coldplay does continue to get farther away from the <em>Parachutes</em>/<em>Rush of Blood</em> sound that made them great in the first place. But it&#8217;s easy to get most of this album stuck in your head. I like easy.</p>
<p><strong>Favorite Tracks:</strong> &#8220;Hurts Like Heaven,&#8221; &#8220;Charlie Brown,&#8221; &#8220;Major Minus&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3619</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Dark Knight Returns</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3612</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3612#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 16:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Batman: Arkham City After a summer of Marvel, I&#8217;ve recently descended into the depths of DC. And it would be hard not to, with all the new material they&#8217;ve been putting out lately. As part of the New 52 initiative, every single DC comic has been relaunched in the past month or so, which, you&#8217;ve got to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/batman.jpeg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><em>Batman: Arkham City</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.5.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>After a summer of Marvel, I&#8217;ve recently descended into the depths of DC. And it would be hard not to, with all the new material they&#8217;ve been putting out lately. As part of the New 52 initiative, every single DC comic has been relaunched in the past month or so, which, you&#8217;ve got to admit, is a bold move. There was the <em>Batman: Year One </em>animated film starring Bryan Cranston &#8211; I thought it was OK. <em>DC Universe Online</em>, an MMO that launched earlier this year, just went free to play. And at the center of it all, for gamers like me, that is, there&#8217;s <em>Arkham City</em>, the sequel to the surprisingly great 2009 release <em>Arkham Asylum</em>. So needless to say I&#8217;ve started watching the <em>Justice League </em>cartoon that I never really paid attention to and spending a lot of time thinking about the DC Universe. Was <em>Arkham City </em>a worthy lightning rod for my DC fascination, or is it a disappointing sequel to the game that proved super hero games need not be disappointing?</p>
<p><span id="more-3612"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3882" rel="attachment wp-att-3882"><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-3882" title="063_Sniper-92" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/063_Sniper-92-479x269.jpg" alt="" width="479" height="269" /></a></p>
<p>To start with <em>Arkham City</em>&#8216;s story is to start with it&#8217;s weakest part, but let&#8217;s do that anyway. Frankly, the setup of this game is hard to buy. That&#8217;s compounded by the decision to leave much of the story outside of the actual game, relying on gamers to buy a comic book to fill in the massive gap between the last game and this one. Basically, it seems, the people of Gotham decided to wall of part of the town and stick all of the city&#8217;s criminals and crazies in it. Moreover, they&#8217;ve elected the inept Warden Quincy Sharp as the mayor and he&#8217;s put Hugo Strange in charge of the new &#8220;Arkham City.&#8221; Bruce Wayne, being of sound mind, is totally opposed to this, which gets him kidnapped by Strange&#8217;s goons and thrown in the city. So Wayne escapes and suits up and decides it&#8217;s time for Batman to figure out what&#8217;s up with Arkham City. It&#8217;s a dumb justification for the game&#8217;s most prominent new feature: an open world.</p>
<p>While <em>Arkham Asylum </em>felt more like a <em>Metroid </em>game, giving you a clearly set world dripping with atmosphere for you to explore and re-explore, <em>Arkham City </em>gives you this crime filled city section to dominate. Pretty quickly I picked up an upgrade that let me use Batman&#8217;s ability cape glide with his grappling hook, allowing me to essentially fly all over the city, dropping in on random criminals whenever they took my fancy. Beyond territorial packs of goons, the game is littered with Riddler trophies to collect, hundreds more than the last game. And there are side missions too, which are the only way to interact with some of the rogue&#8217;s gallery, such as Bane and Zsasz. The open world is fun enough, but where the game really shines is indoors, during the story missions.</p>
<p>Batman spends the bulk of the story chasing down important villains such as the Penguin and Mr. Freeze. These guys are all holding out inside of buildings, don&#8217;t expect to chase them down on the street. Once you&#8217;re inside a location, the game feels a lot more like <em>Arkham Asylum</em>. You are the predator, trapped in a room full of thugs waiting to be taken out. The stealth gameplay is a fun as ever, with plenty of gadgets to help you take down bad guys just like The Bat would. But, of course, sometimes you get spotted and have to actually fight a group of dudes. Fortunately, the last game&#8217;s terrific melee combat system is back and more fun than ever. The simple, counter-based combo combat is a lot of fun and makes taking on groups of enemies a blast.</p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3883" rel="attachment wp-att-3883"><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-3883" title="029_brawl-82" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/029_brawl-82-479x269.jpg" alt="" width="479" height="269" /></a></p>
<p>When you&#8217;re done with the story, you can choose to keep working in the city or start a New Game Plus, which significantly amps up the difficulty. Upgrades and collectibles are consistent between both campaigns, which is appreciated. Challenge maps make a return as well, with plenty of the predator and combat variety to keep you entertained as long as you care.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s worth mentioning that the game comes with a code to download additional Catwoman content. The DLC adds four Catwoman missions that give some context to her appearances in the story, as well as adding some new challenge maps and filling the world with additional, Catwoman-only Riddler trophies to collect. Playing as Catwoman is fairly different from Batman, she even has her own upgrades to unlock, but honestly I&#8217;m not convinced it&#8217;s necessary. Batman is much more fun to play as and it just sucks that if you don&#8217;t have the code, you&#8217;d have to pay money to unlock part of the game&#8217;s story. With the absolute mess that was <em>Arkham City</em>&#8216;s preorder bonuses, it&#8217;s worth noting that all the other DLC skin packs can only be used in New Game Plus and the challenge modes.</p>
<p><em>Arkham City </em>is not the revelation that the last game was. Kevin Conroy and Mark Hamill lead a great voice cast, but the story is just OK, really only picking up at the end. Giving up the first game&#8217;s great condensed setting for an open world was a risky move, but it ultimately paid off, as flying around town is immensely satisfying. What worked last time around works here and that&#8217;s basically what I&#8217;m looking for in a sequel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3612</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Something Wild</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3844</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3844#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 23:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wild Flag &#8211; Wild Flag Olympia&#8217;s Sleater-Kinney had always been a band that I liked, but kind of had a hard time really getting into.  I guess I just always found myself hoping they had more songs like One Beat&#8217;s &#8220;Oh!&#8221;, which is considerably more, well fun, than their more overtly political and feminist material. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/wild-flag-romance-cover_jpeg_630x800_q85.jpeg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Wild Flag &#8211; <em>Wild Flag</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Olympia&#8217;s Sleater-Kinney had always been a band that I liked, but kind of had a hard time really getting into.  I guess I just always found myself hoping they had more songs like <em>One Beat&#8217;s</em> &#8220;Oh!&#8221;, which is considerably more, well fun, than their more overtly political and feminist material.  So it&#8217;s nice that an album like Wild Flag&#8217;s debut exists, since it basically sounds like that song spread out over 40 minutes of hooky guitar-driven girl rock.</p>
<p>Now the reason I bring up Sleater-Kinney is pretty obvious, since Wild Flag is made up of Sleater-Kinney&#8217;s guitarist/singer (and <em>Portlandia</em> co-star) Carrie Brownstein and drummer Janet Weiss, as well as members of the bands Helium and The Minders.  So yeah, Wild Flag is more or a less an &#8220;indie supergroup&#8221;, but unlike something like Monsters Of Folk, the band&#8217;s sound is a bit more cohesive.  This is probably due to the fact that Brownstein obviously serves as the band&#8217;s guiding force, as her blistering guitar and vocals are really what drive the band&#8217;s sound.  Still, keyboardist Rebecca Cole adds a nice texture that wasn&#8217;t there in Sleater-Kinney, while Janet Weiss&#8217;s thunderous drumming proves once again that she can pretty much make any band sound huge.</p>
<p>For the most part the songs exude a more poppy approach to punk rock, often wavering between jaunty singalongs and more foreboding material.  And since they are after all a supergroup, Wild Flag does occasionaly delve into classic rock histrionics on the somewhat psychedelic &#8220;Glass Tambourine&#8221; and the sprawling &#8220;Race Horse&#8221;.  But for the most part, this is just a refreshingly energetic little rock album in a year that maybe could&#8217;ve used a few more albums like this.</p>
<p><strong>Favorite Tracks:</strong> &#8220;Romance&#8221;, &#8220;Electric Band&#8221;, &#8220;Racehorse&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3844</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Comply</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3840</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3840#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 22:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wilco &#8211; The Whole Love It seems like it&#8217;s been ages since I did that Wilco Retrospecticus, doesn&#8217;t it?  Well despite the fact that this album&#8217;s been out for a while, I don&#8217;t feel like I have a ton to say about it since I don&#8217;t really find Wilco to be the funnest band to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/wilco-the-whole-love.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Wilco &#8211; <em>The Whole Love</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>It seems like it&#8217;s been ages since I did that Wilco Retrospecticus, doesn&#8217;t it?  Well despite the fact that this album&#8217;s been out for a while, I don&#8217;t feel like I have a ton to say about it since I don&#8217;t really find Wilco to be the funnest band to write about.  Still, <em>The Whole Love</em> does mark a noteable point in Wilco&#8217;s career, as it sees the band coming full circle in more ways than one.</p>
<p><em>The Whole Love</em> marks the first release on Wilco&#8217;s own label, dBpm, which kind of just seems like a logical step in Wilco&#8217;s career considering their well-known disputes with record labels.  So with this new sense of freedom, does that mean that Wilco have vied to go in the more radical and experimental direction that marked their earlier music?  Well for the most part, yeah.  <em>The Whole Love</em> features quite a bit of the more unpredictable moments that made albums like <em>Being There</em> and <em>Summerteeth</em> so enjoyable.</p>
<p>And though there is a considerable amount of sonic noodling on <em>The Whole Love</em>, at the same time Wilco often seems like it&#8217;s still in that same breezy comfort zone that it was in on <em>Sky Blue Sky</em> and <em>Wilco (The Album)</em>. For the most part that totally works in the album&#8217;s favor, as the more upbeat songs like &#8220;I Might&#8221; and &#8220;Standing&#8221; are among the most infectious songs the band has done in a while.  And even some of ballads have that great Americana-inspired quality that captures a lot of that old Wilco magic.  So who knows, maybe the band will continue to pursue their more eclectic roots, but for now it&#8217;s just nice to hear a veteran band challenging themselves while still sounding comfortable in their own skin.</p>
<p><strong>Favorite Tracks:</strong> &#8220;I Might&#8221;, &#8220;Dawned On Me&#8221;, &#8220;The Whole Love&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3840</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recap: Zombcon 2011</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3792</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3792#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 04:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know it was like two weeks ago but I just realized I never wrote about Zombcon 2011. I was waiting for Paul to post pictures on Facebook but seeing as he is still yet to do so I might as well write about it before I forget anymore details. For those who aren&#8217;t familiar [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/zombcon.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><p>I know it was like two weeks ago but I just realized I never wrote about Zombcon 2011. I was waiting for Paul to post pictures on Facebook but seeing as he is still yet to do so I might as well write about it before I forget anymore details. For those who aren&#8217;t familiar with Zombcon I&#8217;ll fill ya in. Zombcon is Seattle&#8217;s premier Zombie convention held every October since…. You know I&#8217;m not sure, for all I know last year was the first one ever. This year the convention was moved from the Seattle Science Center Convention Hall to the SeaTac Hilton. Although I preferred the previous setting and last year&#8217;s setup (guests, events, layout) Zombcon 2011 was still a great opportunity to meet some of my favorite B-movie horror stars.</p>
<p><span id="more-3792"></span></p>
<p>Just like last year we arrived at the supposed location and were immediately thrown off by the lack of advertising and people. &#8220;This is the place right?&#8221; seems to start off every Zombcon adventure, I guess that&#8217;s probably the case for most horror conventions, it really only attracts a cult niche. The big draw this year was makeup effects legend/actor Tom Savini (<em>Dawn of the Dead</em>, <em>Friday the 13th</em>) yet looking back that was probably my least memorable encounter. Other features included a <em>Walking Dead</em> panel, although I never did find it, Silly zombie defense panels, and other things that clearly did not leave on impact on me because I can&#8217;t remember them.</p>
<p>The event seemed a little smaller this year but well attended. Of course there was all sorts of booths with cool merchandise or &#8220;merch&#8221; as they call it. There was a room with video games hooked up with stuff like <em>Dead Island</em> and of course a line of celebrity guest booths awkwardly positioned against some windows, which made taking pictures difficult due to the glare. Paul and I started out by doing a few rounds around all the merchandise booths, trying to build up the courage to go talk to our first guest. Though it&#8217;s not so much as building up courage as trying to think of something interesting to say, I mean these guys are probably asked the same questions over and over again then again they are being paid to be here</p>
<p>We approached Tom Savini first but unfortunately couldn&#8217;t think of anythingto say. We did the normal &#8220;I&#8217;m a big fan, blah, blah, I like this movie, blah, blah&#8221; so it was kind of lame but he seemed nice enough. He was a little more quiet than I&#8217;d anticipated and it&#8217;s always a little easier when the guests acutally make an effort to be interested. Take Bruce Campbell from last year, he took the time to actually ask each and every fan about themselves and start up a discussion. Don&#8217;t get me wrong it&#8217;s awesome to meet Tom Savini, I just wish he&#8217;d try a little harder to talk to his fans.</p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3802" rel="attachment wp-att-3802"><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-3802" title="tom-savini-simpsons-6871a" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/tom-savini-simpsons-6871a2-479x376.jpg" alt="" width="449" height="306" /></a></p>
<p>Second I went to go approach b-movie tough guy Sid Haig, best known today for his performance as Captain Spaulding in <em>House of 1000 Corpses</em> and <em>The Devil&#8217;s Rejects</em>. Even though I hate those movies I&#8217;ve enjoyed other Haig roles and always thought he seemed pretty cool. He&#8217;s always had this giant badass kind of image but I guess things have changed a little over time. Now in his seventies, the once towering Haig seemed kinda frail and kept coughing and hacking, he was nice just kind of gross. I tried talking to him about <em>Galaxy of Terror</em> (a movie I reviewed for Shocktober) but I don&#8217;t think he remembered it very well, it was neat but like Savini, another case of awkwardness with no attempt on the guest&#8217;s part to ease the situation.</p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3818" rel="attachment wp-att-3818"><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-3818" title="Devil's Rejects" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/2005_devils_rejects_004-479x317.jpg" alt="" width="449" height="306" /></a></p>
<p>Fortunately Paul and I started to move into a more comfortable rhythm after went to go meet David Emgee aka &#8220;Flyboy&#8221; one of the stars of the iconic 1978 film <em>Dawn of the Dead</em>. Paul took the reigns and asked David about a story he heard where he was hired to work on the film after meeting George A. Romero at a restaurant he was working at. This launched him into a whole story about how he got involved with the film and really it was a treat. Sure you can read about that kind of stuff on the web, but hearing a first hand account? That&#8217;s priceless, and it&#8217;s that kind of personal care and human touch that draws me to meeting my b-movie heroes.</p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3820" rel="attachment wp-att-3820"><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-3820" title="66153-12" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/66153-12-479x274.jpg" alt="" width="449" height="306" /></a></p>
<p>Next we moved to a section reserved for several of the stars of <em>Day of the Dead</em> and after this I felt like we&#8217;d pretty much met just about everyone who was in this movie. First up was Jarlath Conroy who played Bill the amusing wisecracking Irishman. We asked him about the small speaking role he had as the Undertaker in the Coen Brother&#8217;s <em>True Grit</em>, so he gave us a little backstory on that. When it came to taking a picture of us with Jarlath we needed to find someone to do so and who else stepped in but Anthony Dileo who played Miguel in the film. How hilarious is that? Paul mentioned that now whenever he watches <em>Day of the Dead</em> he&#8217;ll have to keep reminding himself that &#8220;That guy in this movie took a picture of us.&#8221; That was just too perfect. Of course I had to meet Anthony Dileo afterwards and I had a warm conversation about his role in the film.</p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3819" rel="attachment wp-att-3819"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3819" title="3516" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/3516.gif" alt="" width="449" height="306" /></a></p>
<p>Time started to wind down, but I felt I couldn&#8217;t leave until I had met horror character actor Bill Moseley. Moseley like Sid Haig is another one of those guys that&#8217;s been in about a million horror b-movies, mostly bad ones, but is best known today for his roles as Chop Top In <em>Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2</em> and Otis B. Driftwood, one the main characters in <em>House of 1000 Corpses</em>, and <em>The Devil&#8217;s Rejects</em>. Though I really don&#8217;t like Rob Zombie&#8217;s films I&#8217;ve always enjoyed the enthusiasm Moseley has brought to his characters. <em>TCM2</em> although a disappointing sequel, was a lot of fun to watch because of Chop Top he&#8217;s just a funny guy. Thankfully he&#8217;s a really nice and funny guy in real life and almost seems a little too normal. I saw that he had a still of him as a monster solider in <em>Army of Darkness</em> so I asked him about it. He talked about how he auditioned by performing Lewis Caroll&#8217;s &#8220;The Jabberwocky&#8221; despite the fact that he only ended up with like one line. I got my autographed Chop Top photo, a picture with him and I was a happy camper.</p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3823" rel="attachment wp-att-3823"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3823" title="choptop613" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/choptop613.jpg" alt="" width="449" height="306" /></a></p>
<p>Really the convention wasn&#8217;t quite the same caliber as last year. Although it&#8217;s hard to top Bruce Campbell, Malcolm McDowell, and George A. Romero, who basically invented the modern zombie. That all aside I love hearing the stories of how some of my favorite horror movies were made and all the celeb swag is too much fun to collect, I&#8217;m already looking forward to next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3792</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>C.A.T.: Flip Your Wig</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3775</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3775#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 01:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hüsker Dü - Flip Your Wig (1985) I&#8217;m just gonna guess that we&#8217;re not doing Whovember for another week or two, so I&#8217;ll just go ahead and return to our year-by-year CAT&#8217;s for at least this week.  I pretty much knew I had to do a Husker Du album for 1985 since they managed to put out [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/8755.jpeg" width="240" />
		</p><table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Hüsker Dü - <em>Flip Your Wig</em> (1985)</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>I&#8217;m just gonna guess that we&#8217;re not doing Whovember for another week or two, so I&#8217;ll just go ahead and return to our year-by-year CAT&#8217;s for at least this week.  I pretty much knew I had to do a Husker Du album for 1985 since they managed to put out two unbelievable albums that year with <em>New Day Rising</em> and <em>Flip Your Wig</em>.  Really I could&#8217;ve gone with either album, but since <em>Flip Your Wig</em> doesn&#8217;t usually get quite as much attention I&#8217;m going with that one, as you probably already figured out.</p>
<p>So the story of Husker Du is one that is pretty similar to that of their Minnesota brethren, The Replacements.  The Huskers started off as an earsplitting hardcore punk band, but with 1984&#8242;s <em>Zen Arcade</em>, they started to incorporate melody more and more into their loud, fast, and uncompromising sound.  <em>New Day Rising</em> saw songwriters Grant Hart and Bob Mould delving even deeper into more melodic songs, and <em>Flip Your Wig</em> sees the band sounding even more like a pop group while still maintaining that punk rock edge.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s almost kind of shocking to hear how ahead of their time Husker Du sound on this album.  With their signature brand of ragged vocals and fuzz-drenched guitars enveloping these pop songs, they completely sound like the kinds of alternative rock bands that would come to dominate the early to mid-&#8217;90s.  Songs like &#8220;Makes No Sense At All&#8221; and &#8220;Flexible Flyer&#8221; have that great hazy guitar sound, and for the first time you can actually understand most of the lyrics on the album. So in many ways <em>Flip Your Wig</em> is probably the most accessable album in the Husker&#8217;s discography.  Of course, this interest in more accessable material simply wasn&#8217;t enough to lift Husker Du out of indie rock&#8217;s underground despite signing to a major label after <em>Flip Your Wig</em>.  Instead, the music world would have to wait a few more years for three dudes from Aberdeen to finally bring this kind of music onto the national stage.</p>
<p><strong>Favorite Tracks:</strong> &#8220;Makes No Sense At All&#8221;, &#8220;Divide And Conquer&#8221;, &#8220;Flexible Flyer&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3775</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Future of Fear: An Opinion Piece</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3753</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3753#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 23:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well Shocktober is winding down so I thought I&#8217;d take a minute to discuss a question that&#8217;s been on my mind lately &#8220;Is the age of good horror movies over?&#8221; So often I hear horror fans speaking fearfully about the decline of horror movies but have the screams really become that much fainter? As the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3757" rel="attachment wp-att-3757"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/360_25horror_frankenstein.jpg" alt="" title="360_25horror_frankenstein" width="469" height="307" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3757" /></a><br />
Well Shocktober is winding down so I thought I&#8217;d take a minute to discuss a question that&#8217;s been on my mind lately &#8220;Is the age of good horror movies over?&#8221; So often I hear horror fans speaking fearfully about the decline of horror movies but have the screams really become that much fainter? As the times have changed so has the landscape of the genre but despite what some may say I think it&#8217;s clear that there&#8217;s just as much potential for good horror movies as there has ever been. </p>
<p>Horror fans may romanticize the mid 70s or early 80s with such classics as; <i>The Exorcist</i>, <i>The Texas Chainsaw Massacre</I>, <i>Halloween</i>, <i>Dawn of the Dead</I>, <i>Nightmare on Elm Street</I>, but that doesn&#8217;t mean the 70s and 80s didn&#8217;t have it&#8217;s fair share of bad films. For every good horror movie there has ALWAYS been about ten bad ones at any given time. There may have been a great horror film released last year but these things take time, you have to wait and reflect on these films in the passing years. </p>
<p>As I just mentioned, many horror fans looks back quite fondly at the 70s and 80s, but that&#8217;s because they tend to only remember the good movies. People romanticize the past because they often choose to only remember the good things, really today is just as good as back then. If there ever truly was a golden age of horror it was probably the 30s (just as it was for most of cinema) and that was great while it lasted but times and trends change, things go in and out of style, and thus the genre is ever evolving. </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s take a look at genre today, I mean what&#8217;s really eating away at the fans? One of the most common complaints I see is a stronger focus on gore over other aspects. I don&#8217;t think anyone would argue that movies today are pretty bloody, but why is that? I&#8217;d say it has something to do with audiences becoming more desensitized to violence, and thus gory movies have become more commercially viable. People are used to gore now so it&#8217;s become common in many horror movies, but in a way hasn&#8217;t it always been? Herschell Gordon Lewis has been making blood soaked films since the 60s and don&#8217;t get me started with the kind of visceral imagery that Lucio Fulci put to film in the decade after that. So really gory movies aren&#8217;t anything new, people are just less shocked by them as they should be. So now you see filmmakers trying to push what we&#8217;ve already seen in the disgusting department to new levels. That may be good for some, but I&#8217;ll bet you a plump christmas goose that&#8217;s not the main reason most moviegoers go to horror movies. Plain and simple people want to be scared and I don&#8217;t think they care how it happens, as long as it&#8217;s done well.</p>
<p>Seeing that your typical horror fan is fairly open to anything they&#8217;ll see these hashed out gory movies, I mean there are only so many horror movies released in theaters each year. So this doesn&#8217;t mean that audiences aren&#8217;t open to different kinds of horror movies. Take for example <i>Paranormal Activity</i>; it&#8217;s low budget, not gory, not flashy, and yet it was a huge success that&#8217;s launched a popular franchise. On top of all this it even beat <i>Saw VI</i> on it&#8217;s own opening weekend. This shows that audiences aren&#8217;t simply drawn to the gore in the genre but to the act of being surprised and excited. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen many of great horror movies come out of the 2000s. Just look at all the crazy shit Japan has cooked up since then? If you ask me some of the best foreign horror movies I&#8217;ve ever seen came out of the last ten years. Films like; <i>The Host</I> from South Korea, <I>Rec</I> from Spain, <i>Shaun of the Dead</i> from the UK, <i>Let the Right One In</I> from Sweden… and the list goes on. Of course there&#8217;s always been a thriving indie scene for any genre as well and that&#8217;s no exception within horror. There&#8217;s some great stuff out of there you just got to look for it, be brave, be experimental, that&#8217;s what it&#8217;s all about. I love horror movies but I refuse to live in the past when there&#8217;s so much I could be missing out on. I&#8217;m not sure why I wrote this post, I suppose I&#8217;m just annoyed by people online always complaining about  \how bad modern entertainment has become, and so I decided to apply it to horror movies. Always look ahead monster movie fans, you might be surprised with what you&#8217;ll find. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3753</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 31</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3737</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3737#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 22:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Birdemic: Shock and Terror (2008) Rather then end Shocktober or &#8220;Shlocktober&#8221; on a grim note with my disgust of Rob Zombie&#8217;s Halloween, I decided I&#8217;d end the countdown with a movie that personifies what Shlocktober is all about. So many times I&#8217;ve used the phrase &#8220;So bad it&#8217;s good&#8221; and this is one of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Birdemic: Shock and Terror (2008)</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3739" rel="attachment wp-att-3739"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-3739" title="birdemic" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/birdemic-188x300.jpg" alt="" width="199" height="300" /></a>Rather then end Shocktober or &#8220;Shlocktober&#8221; on a grim note with my disgust of Rob Zombie&#8217;s <em>Halloween</em>, I decided I&#8217;d end the countdown with a movie that personifies what Shlocktober is all about. So many times I&#8217;ve used the phrase &#8220;So bad it&#8217;s good&#8221; and this is one of the best of those kind I&#8217;ve seen in years.</p>
<p>&#8220;Why did the Eagles and Vultures Attacked?&#8221; Yes you heard me &#8220;Attack-ed&#8221;. This is the very phrase that adorned dozens of flyers handed out by Vietnamese born director James Nguyen at Sundance 2009 and that pretty much sums it all up. Some films are rushed, some struggle with a low budget, and some filmmakers are just incompetent, James Nguyen is three for three in that department. How someone with such little understanding of plotting, characters, and film in general even MADE A FILM boggles the mind. On one hand you have to respect someone for going up to the plate to take a swin, so maybe Nguyen just got hit in the head by a pitch, his mind certainly seems to operate that way.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s a good indicator that a film will be bad when there is a typo in the opening credits. &#8220;Supporting Casts&#8221; is what appears bold as day as it&#8217;s played over boring driving footage to a song that loops every thirty seconds&#8230; Snd the movie hasn&#8217;t even started yet. When it does we are introduced to a young software salesman Rod (Alan Bagh) who is almost the caliber of actor as Ray Horton from our videos from high school. Rod lives the sweet life in Silicon valley and things only get sweeter when he reconnects with Nathalie (Whitney Moore) an old classmate and aspiring fashion model who does shoots at what looks like a one hour photo place. But just as their romance takes off so does a swarm of killer hawks and eagles that begin to explode all over the city.</p>
<p>Instead of continuing with a plot summary here&#8217;s a list of some of the mistakes, errors, and other oddities present in <em>Birdemic</em>.</p>
<ul>
<li>All of the killer birds in the film fly in place like hummingbirds. This is most likely done to save money on CGI, but the filmmaker&#8217;s explantation is &#8220;Global warming has caused them to be mutant, toxic, and flammable. That&#8217;s why, when they take a kamikaze drive, they explode, and when they drop bird fluid on some of the cast, they get burned.&#8221; Though I don&#8217;t really see how that answers the question.</li>
<li>Characters are never seen reloading their weapons after firing off endless rounds. I should probably as well mention that a popular weapon for most of the characters is coat hangers.</li>
<li>Doves fight off eagles in the film despite the fact that eagles (and remember they are radioactive) are predators to doves.</li>
<li>Sometimes we see people driving around in the background not reacting to the bird attack. I&#8217;m sure these people weren&#8217;t supposed to be in the film.</li>
<li>A great deal of dialogue is inaudible and the room tone is never consistent.</li>
<li>If I recall correctly it was supposed to be December and yet there is a scene at a harvest festival.</li>
<li>When Rod is watching stock footage on the TV we can clearly see the Getty Images watermark emblazoned over it, showing that the makers were probably too cheap to actually buy the footage.</li>
<li>Constantly, characters who we&#8217;ve never seen arbitrarily appear to complain about global warming. The film <em>An Inconvienent Truth</em> is mentioned numerous times.</li>
</ul>
<p>You could go on to a fill a book with all this insanity, Im just speechless. From a technical standpoint this film is no better than some family&#8217;s home movies. There&#8217;s nothing to speak of visually and I can&#8217;t recall seeing a film with so many sound errors. The room tone in this film is always off, either being far too loud or silent and the dialogue is a garbled mess. It&#8217;s not like these would be difficult problems to fix either. Did Nguyen really see no problems with any of this footage?</p>
<p><em>Birdemic</em> is one of those films that isn&#8217;t as much a film as it is a series of embarrassing mistakes. Fortunately what this all adds up to is one of the funniest bad movies I&#8217;ve seen in a long time, you wanna laugh? Watch <em>Birdemic</em> it will make your night, and with that I thank you for reading this year&#8217;s <em>Shocktober</em> series it was one strange trip but it&#8217;s done, happy haunting.</p>
<p>And here&#8217;s one last video to bug Sean with it&#8217;s improper formatting!<br />
<iframe width="479" height="273" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/jE5dJDgZ644" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3737</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John&#8217;s Top Five Horror Films of 2011</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3711</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3711#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 22:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You don&#8217;t see a lot of &#8220;Top Fives&#8221; on the blog but I also don&#8217;t see many good horror movies these days. Thankfully there&#8217;s always a few so I can at least do a this short list. It&#8217;s a little complicated to sort out when all these movies actually came out considering most of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t see a lot of &#8220;Top Fives&#8221; on the blog but I also don&#8217;t see many good horror movies these days. Thankfully there&#8217;s always a few so I can at least do a this short list. It&#8217;s a little complicated to sort out when all these movies actually came out considering most of the best modern horror movies are either foreign or independently released but this is close enough, enjoy if you dare.</p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3716" rel="attachment wp-att-3716"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/photo_02-479x317.jpg" alt="" title="photo_02" width="479" height="317" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-3716" /></a></p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><em>5. Vanishing on 7th Street</em></span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>More and more I find myself respecting the efforts of independent filmmaker Brad Anderson (<em>The Machinist</em>, <em>Transsiberian</em>) one of the few indie filmmakers today trying to put the story back in horror story. Anderson isn&#8217;t about big scares as much he&#8217;s about establishing atmosphere and characters we care about. Although most critics weren&#8217;t crazy about it I thought <em>Vanishing on 7th Street</em> was a great <em>Twilight Zone-esque</em> tale of twists and turns, this is basically what I wish M. Night Shyamalan still was.</p>
<p>The premise is that of a millions of people that suddenly vanish when a wave darkness hits Detroit. The days begin to grow shorter and the nights longer as darkness starts to engulf people leaving only their clothes behind. The only way to fight it is to make sure you&#8217;re near a light source at all times, glow sticks, flashlights, all that stuff, and it leads for a very exciting experience. Hayden &#8220;My new powers can save you&#8221; Christensen stars alongside a small cast along with Thandie Newton, John Lequizamo, and Jacob Latimore, and the name of the game is survival. Simply put this is a well written piece with a spooky premise that constantly keeps you on the edge of your seat, I liked it.</p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3719" rel="attachment wp-att-3719"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/paranormal-activity-3-479x319.jpg" alt="" title="paranormal-activity-3" width="479" height="319" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-3719" /></a></p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><em>4. Paranormal Activity 3</em></span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Of course this had to be here now that the series has become a Halloween tradition. I reviewed this just a few days ago so I wont say much more but it&#8217;s a great spook house movie that must be seen in theaters. This is probably the scariest movie on this top five and must be seen by anyone who considers themself a fan of ghost stories.</p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3722" rel="attachment wp-att-3722"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/tucker-dale-vs-evil-image-2-479x316.jpg" alt="" title="tucker-dale-vs-evil-image-2" width="479" height="319" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-3722" /></a></p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><em>3. Tucker and Dale vs. Evil</em></span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>: Another one that&#8217;s tricky to pin down due to it&#8217;s independent release, but I just couldn&#8217;t do this list without the wackiest horror comedy of the year. Tyler Labine and Alan Tudyk are a fantastic comic pairing in this satire on the &#8220;Killbilly&#8221; genre. So often we see movies where teens are chased down by gap toothed gold &#8216;ol boys, so it&#8217;s a great twist to see it the other way around.</p>
<p>Tucker and Dale are two peaceful bumpkins on vacation at their newly acquired fixer upper cabin when they cross paths with a group of preppy and inconsiderate college students. Believing Tucker and Dale to be a threat after supposedly kidnapping one of their own (a girl who they actually saved), the college kids wage a very gory war against Tucker and Dale. This results in a bizarre collection of mishaps in which each college kid accidentally gets killed by their own incompetence. It&#8217;s an absurd premise but it&#8217;s got great some gore and even greater laughs.</p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3723" rel="attachment wp-att-3723"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/TrollHunterStill-479x319.jpg" alt="" title="TrollHunterStill" width="479" height="319" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-3723" /></a></p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><em>2. Trollhunter</em></span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>It took awhile to see the light of day here in the States but now that it&#8217;s here I highly recommend everyone watch Norway&#8217;s answer to <em>Cloverfield</em>. Hmm, I think I actually like this better than <em>Cloverfield</em>. The characters are great and the mythology is just so rich and endlessly intriguing, we definitely get a nice little troll education here and there. It&#8217;s got laughs and scares and consistently keeps a fun quick pace. It&#8217;s movies like this that keep the handheld camera sub-genre alive and flourishing. I don&#8217;t know what else to say but it&#8217;s the best movie bout trolls I&#8217;ve ever seen, though I guess that isn&#8217;t saying much. </p>
<p>P.S. It&#8217;s on Netflix RIGHT NOW! See it while you still can. </p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3724" rel="attachment wp-att-3724"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/attack-the-block-believe-whysoblu-479x318.jpg" alt="" title="attack-the-block-believe-whysoblu" width="479" height="319" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-3724" /></a></p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><em>1. Attack the Block</em></span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Not only was this my favorite horror movie of 2011 but also my favorite sci-fi, action, and comedy film. <i>Attack the Block</i> is a high adrenaline genre smorgasbord with more laughs and excitement than anything you saw last summer. The debut film from writer/director Joe Cornish I haven&#8217;t enjoyed a British comedy like this since the last Simon Pegg/Edgar Wright collaboration. So it&#8217;s not much of a surprise to find out that Edgar Wright was one of the film&#8217;s producers and Nick Frost is one of the very colorful cast members.</p>
<p>When an army of giant gorilla-like aliens invade South London it&#8217;s up to a gang of rambunctious young hoodlums to defend their block. That premise alone sold me and from then on out I couldn&#8217;t get enough of this sharp and surprisingly smart alien massacre movie. The dialogue, all though coated in a thick London accent is full of gems. My favorite line is probably when one of the kids only has one text left to send and says, &#8220;I&#8217;ve got one text left, this is too much madness to explain in one text!&#8221; I also like how the kids call the aliens &#8220;Big Gorilla Wolf Motherfuckers.&#8221; You wouldn&#8217;t think you could sympathize for a bunch of rude street toughs but somehow you start to develop a soft spot. I only pray this is never remade, check it out!</p>
<p><strong>Honorable Mention</strong><br />
<strong>Insidious</strong> &#8211; The Guys behind <i>Saw</I> make their best movies since… Actually this is better than any of the <em>Saw</em> movies. It&#8217;s just a gold old haunted house movie that was a joy to watch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3711</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 30</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3699</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3699#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 01:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3699</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Halloween (2007) Never have I wanted to walk out of a theater more than when I saw this soulless piece of schlock. Ninety unbearable minutes of unbelievably unsavory characters taking part and being subjected to grisly, meaningless, violence. Some may argue that &#8220;Making it hard to watch only makes it more effective.&#8221; but to that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Halloween (2007)</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3701" rel="attachment wp-att-3701"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Halloween2007-197x300.jpg" alt="" title="Halloween2007" width="199" height="300" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-3701" /></a>Never have I wanted to walk out of a theater more than when I saw this soulless piece of schlock. Ninety unbearable minutes of unbelievably unsavory characters taking part and being subjected to grisly, meaningless, violence. Some may argue that &#8220;Making it hard to watch only makes it more effective.&#8221; but to that I respond &#8220;You are retarded.&#8221; Yes horror movies are supposed to be sadistic they are &#8220;Horror&#8221; movies after all, but they should also mean something. You should care and feel about what&#8217;s going on, relate with someone in the movie and overall it should be entertaining and hopefully even innovative. None of these are traits which <i>Halloween</I> possesses. </p>
<p>The approach here was to start with the origin story of Michael Myers which of course as we all know by now is always a terrible idea. Remember the Phantom Menace? All this does is ruin the mystique of the character, plus what more do we need to know about Michael? We already saw a prepubescent Michael slash up his sister in the original flick do we really need 15 more minutes of that in a &#8220;re-imagining?&#8221; Surprisingly <i>Halloween</i> is actually a case where humanizing the antagonist weakens his presence. Knowing that Michael was from a broken home and picked on by bullies just makes me feel bad for him, I&#8217;m supposed to fear him remember? He was scarier when his sudden bloodlust came out of nowhere because it was so unexpected. What we don&#8217;t understand, that&#8217;s what we fear the most.</p>
<p>After about 15 or 20 minutes of origin story, we are then subjected to a painfully dull rehash of the original film. Laurie has to babysit on Halloween, blah, blah, teens having sex get murdered, blah, blah, he&#8217;s dead, he&#8217;s not dead, and I don&#8217;t give a shit. Like I haven&#8217;t already seen all this done better about a hundred times before. The only reason any of this even exists is is to pad out the running time. I mean you couldn&#8217;t just have a twenty minute origin movie now could you? Which brings us to the fact that this movie &#8220;Should not have been made!&#8221; Though with Rob Zombie&#8217;s involvement or not, this movie was going to be made no matter what. </p>
<p>Could this movie had been remade any better? Well seeing that about 80% of horror movie remakes are beyond unwatchable, probably not. What almost depresses me the most is how John Carpenter doesn&#8217;t give a shit about the legacies of his own movies. It&#8217;s like all he does these days is collect paychecks and piss off his fans. Not that it&#8217;s really any of his control with the studios and everything, it&#8217;s just the fact that it doesn&#8217;t bother him. I mean you&#8217;ll be hard pressed to find a Carpenter fan that likes or approves of any of these Carpenter remakes so stop making them!</p>
<p>Really it&#8217;s that damned Hollywood machine that deserves the most blame. It seems cliched to talk about how much Hollywood cares about money over artistic vision, but as far as I can tell that seems to the be the case in a nut shell. Sadly we are to forever be surrounded by terrible remakes of these classics. Though it&#8217;s up to both you and I to try and ignore them and look to other venues for our freaky fix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3699</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Transformers 3</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3695</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3695#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 23:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3695</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Transformers: Dark of the Moon After Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen was such an unmitigated disaster, how could people want a third one? How could they want another Michael Bay Transformers movie so badly that they turned Dark of the Moon into one of the highest grossing films of all time? Who are these people? To [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><em>Transformers: Dark of the Moon</em></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3696" rel="attachment wp-att-3696"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-3696" title="Transformers_dark_of_the_moon_ver5" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Transformers_dark_of_the_moon_ver5-201x300.jpg" alt="" width="201" height="300" /></a>After <em>Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen</em> was such an unmitigated disaster, how could people want a third one? How could they want another Michael Bay <em>Transformers</em> movie so badly that they turned <em>Dark of the Moon</em> into one of the highest grossing films of all time? Who are these people? To answer that question, I sat down with my brother and dad last night and watched this self-inflicted wound all the way through.</p>
<p><em>Dark of the Moon </em>opens with a big spaceship crashing on the moon. When CG John F Kennedy hears about this, he orchestrates the space race with the secret intention of beating the Russians to this alien technology. They get up there and Neil Armstrong looks around the ship and then they come back and the space race ends. Immediately the film shifts to present day, where we stare at the butt of this film&#8217;s supermodel girlfriend for Shia LaBeouf. After Michael Bay has his lust temporarily sedated, we catch up with Shia. Since the last movie, he&#8217;s graduated from college and is looking for work. He wants to be someone important, but being a recent college grad, he doesn&#8217;t have that many opportunities available to him. We learn that he met his girlfriend after getting a medal from CG Barack Obama at the White House, even though it&#8217;s established she works at a car showroom. What&#8217;s worse, Shia&#8217;s parents show up in a Sarah Palin-style tour bus. God, I hate these people.</p>
<p>So Shia goes on to act like a whiny bitch with his beautiful girlfriend and rich parents for a while. Meanwhile, that Tad Hamilton guy is in Chernobyl with the Autobots for some reason. They find some thing and then get attacked by Soundwave, who, if you remember, was a fucking boombox in the show. Now he&#8217;s a fancy car surrounded by gigantic metal tentacles, you probably remember those from the trailer. Optimus is pissed about something and so he goes to the moon and brings back Sentinel Prime, who was hidden on that spaceship up there the whole time. Sentinel Prime has some of the key components of the Space Bridge, the teleporting technology to go instantly between Cybertron and Earth. Also, Sentinel Prime is played by Leonard Nimoy, who played Galvatron in the real <em>Transformers </em>movie. I don&#8217;t think Michael Bay knows this, however, since he instead just makes every Spock reference possible. Sentinel Prime actually says &#8220;The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few&#8221; at one part. The gall of this man.</p>
<p>I guess Michael Bay liked <em>Burn After Reading</em>, because we learn that Frances McDormand is now in charge of the Autobots side of the U.S. government and John Malkovich is the weirdo who hires Shia. Malkovich acts like a hardass boss during the interview, but then quickly becomes a joke before disappearing entirely. He doesn&#8217;t really even matter, because Shia&#8217;s time at his new job is spent getting into homoerotic situations with Ken Jeong, who as it turns out worked for NASA during Apollo 11. Laserbeak, Soundwave&#8217;s cassette tape who is now simply a bird robot, kills Ken Jeong, so now Shia&#8217;s on the case. But he&#8217;s too late: Sentinel Prime betrays Optimus and joins with Megatron to summon the limitless army of Decepticons on Cybertron to Earth. Shia learns that his supermodel girlfriend&#8217;s boss secretly has been helping the Decepticons the whole time and she gets kidnapped. The Decepticons take over Chicago for some reason, and the U.S. government gives into their demand to exile the Autobots. They all get on another spaceship and then that ship gets blown up by Starscream (I think, it&#8217;s hard to tell).</p>
<p>With all the Autobots seemingly dead, Shia joins up with Tyrese Gibson and his old military buddies to head to Chicago. But when they get there, they give up because they didn&#8217;t think this through. Then, out of nowhere, the Autobots show up. They weren&#8217;t on the spaceship at all! Shia asks why and Optimus basically says no reason. Then there&#8217;s an action sequence for at least an hour. They spend forever trying to get to a certain building, even though they actually make it there to save the supermodel within minutes. They save her and leave and then realize they need to go there again. And it takes forever. Optimus flies around and gets stuck in hanging wires like an idiot. Some Autobot who&#8217;s like an old British scientist, complete with weird robot Einstein hair, gets killed and we&#8217;re supposed to be sad. Megatron basically sits there helplessly for the whole movie. Dudes parachute in and kill random, unnamed Decepticons. Sentinel Prime just stands on a building monologuing like an evil Spock. Eventually he fights Optimus. He&#8217;s about to win, but the supermodel manipulates Megatron into actually doing something, so he backstabs Sentinel. Then Optimus kills Megatron like a bitch. He does a brief monologue and boom, movie over.</p>
<p>It probably shouldn&#8217;t, but it still bothers me how far from the source material we&#8217;ve come. All the Autobots are douchebags, especially Optimus Prime. They&#8217;re just jerks to everybody. And you can&#8217;t even tell who the Decepticons are, I thought Soundwave died three times because I couldn&#8217;t tell him from the others. The humans are all horrible people, especially Shia LaBeouf, who spends the whole fucking movie whining and screaming. I hate him so much. The supermodel is worse than Megan Fox, she&#8217;s just meat put on display for us, often standing in sexy poses during the most dangerous situations. At least John Tuturro and Alan Tudyk (as his European manservent) seem like they&#8217;re having fun with their parts. But most everything that was wrong with the last movie is wrong with this one: the story is hard to follow and stupid, the characters are terrible and it&#8217;s way too damn long &#8211; longer than <em>Revenger of the Fallen</em>. The CG generally looks nice and it&#8217;s easier to follow now, especially because so much is in slow motion, but I still don&#8217;t really care.</p>
<p>But what about my brother and dad? They liked <em>X-men Origins: Wolverine </em>after all. They wanted to see this movie. I had to wait for them to start it. About halfway through the experience, my dad turned to me and asked why I wanted to see it. I told him it was to write about how bad it is. He accepted that answer. As soon as the credits started, they were up and out of there. My brother seemed excited about some parts of it, but when it was over he was quick to call it a bad movie. He just liked seeing fancy cars, I reckon. Later, my dad took me aside to talk about how bad the movie was. He even mentioned it to my other brother on the phone.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s just a shame, Michael Bay could have made a much more action-packed, bizarre movie if he stuck to the source material. He could have set it during the 1980s and the ridiculousness of it, things like the main villain turning into a gun that someone else had to fire, would be greater than anything in his film series. Instead, he created a successful franchise without a soul. A terrible machine that transforms hope and love into sorrow and loathing. And I hear we&#8217;re in for like two more of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3695</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>San Fran Rock City</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3608</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3608#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 01:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Driver: San Francisco It seems like every year there&#8217;s one racing game that captures my interest. Last year, it was the totally thrilling Split/Second. This year, somehow, it&#8217;s the latest Driver game. The Driver franchise has never been one that I cared about, save for when I heard Driv3r was starring Michael Madsen, Mickey Rourke [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><em>Driver: San Francisco</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3609" rel="attachment wp-att-3609"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-3609" title="Driver_San_Francisco_Box_Art" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Driver_San_Francisco_Box_Art-243x300.jpg" alt="" width="243" height="300" /></a>It seems like every year there&#8217;s one racing game that captures my interest. Last year, it was the totally thrilling <em>Split/Second</em>. This year, somehow, it&#8217;s the latest <em>Driver </em>game. The <em>Driver </em>franchise has never been one that I cared about, save for when I heard <em>Driv3r </em>was starring Michael Madsen, Mickey Rourke and Ving Rhames. Even then, I didn&#8217;t really care about it, I was just confused. Why would you want Michael Madsen to star in a driving video game with a terrible title? But, by combining basic cable buddy cop antics with <em>Quantum Leap</em>, <em>Driver: San Francisco </em>demanded not just my attention, but a good chunk of my time too.</p>
<p>You play as Detective John Tanner, a cop who is obviously cool because he drives a Dodge Challenger modelled after the one in the movie <em>Vanishing Point</em>. Tanner, along with his partner Tobias Jones respond to a call that Jericho, the guy they put away in <em>Driv3r </em>is trying to escape prison by hijacking his prison transport truck. But Jericho gets the drop on Tanner, ramming into his car. Tanner awakens hours earlier, now with the power to leave his body and take over any driver on the road. Just like <em>Quantum Leap</em>, passengers don&#8217;t know that they&#8217;re drivers have been possessed, providing much of the game&#8217;s humor as Tanner tries to blend in. With his new powers, Tanner has to get to the bottom of Jericho&#8217;s evil plans and bring him in before he can get away for good.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s probably worth noting that Tanner, Jones and Jericho sound nothing like Madsen, Rhames and Rourke and I had no problem not knowing the plot of previous <em>Driver </em>games. The game makes it clear enough early on: Jericho&#8217;s bad, Tanner&#8217;s good, go play. The game&#8217;s written like a cheesy cop show and it works pretty well. It has a lot of fun with the weirdness of interacting with passengers and generally the game has a pretty light tone.</p>
<p>Being able to switch from car-to-car really changes the way you play a racing game. Having trouble catching up with a car you&#8217;re chasing? Just switch into an oncoming truck and smash into them. Need to be in a bunch of places at once? No problem, just pick the nearest cars to those locations. Need to find out information about a hired assassin? Just posses her driver. There&#8217;s a reasonable variety to the game, but its the innate fun of this mechanic that makes playing through <em>Driver: San Francisco </em>enjoyable.</p>
<p>This is an open world game, in the vein of <em>Burnout Paradise</em>. You&#8217;ve got more and more of San Francisco to drive around as the game&#8217;s story progresses and plenty of diversions if you don&#8217;t feel like spending time with Tanner and Jones. There are side missions that tell more amusing stories, like the dumb kids who end up getting involved in the street racing circuit or an angry agent who destroys the signs for the gig of a rival band. More substantially, there are tons of challenges and stunts to be completed around the city. These are simple activities, like &#8220;keep your car at 100 mph for 30 seconds&#8221; or &#8220;drift for 50 feet&#8221; but they reward you with precious income. You can use your earnings to buy cars to spawn or upgrades for yourself, like an enhanced boost ability or ramming.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s also mulitplayer, for what it&#8217;s worth.</p>
<p><em>Driver: San Francisco </em>would not be much if it was a straight driving game. The driving mechanics of the game are solid, but not especially fun. The game looks all right, but it certainly doesn&#8217;t stand out. But the supernatural aspect of the game makes it unique and compelling. If I&#8217;m only going to play one racing game this year (and it looks like that will be the case) I&#8217;m glad it&#8217;s this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3608</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 29</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3674</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3674#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 20:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3674</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Wicker Man (2006) Remakes, yuck! They&#8217;ve really taken over Hollywood in the past decade and from the looks of it are here to stay. But do remakes really make enough money to justify there being so many? I guess some do okay but it&#8217;s my opinion that many underperform due to a general lack [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">The Wicker Man (2006)</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3675" rel="attachment wp-att-3675"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-3675" title="Wicker-man-poster" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Wicker-man-poster-202x300.jpg" alt="" width="199" height="300" /></a>Remakes, yuck! They&#8217;ve really taken over Hollywood in the past decade and from the looks of it are here to stay. But do remakes really make enough money to justify there being so many? I guess some do okay but it&#8217;s my opinion that many underperform due to a general lack of interest. Surely they don&#8217;t make them for fans of the original films because those are the exact people that don&#8217;t want them made. What it comes down to is a lack of imagination in the industry and good old American laziness, and this film is a definite example of the latter.</p>
<p>The original <em>Wicker Man</em> released in 1973 was a classic British thriller directed by Robin Hardy, written by veteran playwright/ screenwriter Anthony Shaffer (<em>Sleuth</em>, <em>Frenzy</em>), and starring Edward Woodward as the film&#8217;s protagonist Sgt. Howie and Christopher Lee as the primary antagonist Lord Summerisle. It was a chilling film about a British policeman drawn to the island of Summerisle after receiving an anonymous letter. The case is that of a missing girl named Rowan Morrison that for whatever reason the people of Summerisle refuse to acknowledge. Delving deep into the mysterious Pagan rituals of the islanders, Sgt. Howie&#8217;s investigation eventually takes a a very dark turn, leading to one of the most disturbing endings to a horror film I can recall. Neil Labute&#8217;s <em>Wicker Man</em> released in 2006 is a sloppy and meaningless mess that only seems exists to make a quick buck and ensure that Nic Cage can get a check and pay off his tax woes.</p>
<p>For the most part Labute&#8217;s <em>Wicker Man</em> is fairly similar to the original but with small arbitrary changes. Edward Woodward starred in the original so now the the main character&#8217;s name is Edward and the missing girl&#8217;s name is Rowan &#8220;Woodward&#8221;. The original film was set off the coast of Scotland but is now on island of the coast of Washington state, this was clearly made so that it could star an American actor. The major crop of the pagans in the original was apples but now it&#8217;s honey because Nicolas Cage is allergic to bees and the list goes on. Some of the changes seem to exist merely so the film isn&#8217;t an exact copy and yet they still manage to ruin all the meaning and symbolism of the original. One scene in particular is the &#8220;bug-in-a-desk&#8221; allegory from the original. In the original there&#8217;s a child who keeps a bug in her desk tied around a small object and no matter what the bug will always move in the same direction further tangling itself until it can&#8217;t move. This could be seen as similar to Sgt. Howie descending further in the same direction only further cementing his tragic fate. The remake has a scene with a bird in the desk because &#8220;We wanted to see how long it could live in there.&#8221; This doesn&#8217;t mean the same thing at all and is incredibly stupid.</p>
<p>Another aspect that made the original so intriguing was the fact that although the pagans were the antagonists you could kind of understand where they were coming from. Both Howie a devout Christian and the Pagans were firmly following their own beliefs. The pagans weren&#8217;t necessarily evil, but these new people just seem evil and Nicolas Cage isn&#8217;t religious so that dynamic is gone. This leads to the ending having none of the same impact in the remake. <strong>SPOILER AHEAD (go to the next paragraph if you don&#8217;t want this ruined)</strong> The original ended marvelously with Howie being tricked into a wild goose chase so that a Christian could be sacrificed to the wicker man, so they trap him inside and burn him alive. There the Pagans all smile and join in song as Howie recites bible passages and slowly burns, but now that&#8217;s all changed. This time it just seems like they kill him because they&#8217;re bad guys and they drone on and on about bees and shit and Nicolas Cage just screams. So it has none of the same religious impact or even scare factor and then it ends with &#8220;For Johnny Ramone&#8221; weird huh?</p>
<p>The original is a classic and one of the best horror/mystery films of it&#8217;s time, I&#8217;d recommend it to anyone, but this? This is just a quick cash in with little to no artistic integrity. So let me send it off with this weird montage that seems like it would make more sense in context but really doesn&#8217;t.<br />
<iframe width="479" height="355" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/e6i2WRreARo?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3674</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bloodcurdling Beginnings</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3667</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3667#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 19:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paranormal Activity 3 It&#8217;s movies like that this that remind of us why we even still have movie theaters. The feeling of a group of people all coming together to share the same thrills and chills is one that will never be toppled by the internet or any streaming service. These are the same reasons [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span style="font-size: x-large;"><em>Paranormal Activity 3</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3669" rel="attachment wp-att-3669"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/ParanormalActivity3Poster-203x300.jpg" alt="" title="ParanormalActivity3Poster" width="199" height="300" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-3669" /></a>It&#8217;s movies like that this that remind of us why we even still have movie theaters. The feeling of a group of people all coming together to share the same thrills and chills is one that will never be toppled by the internet or any streaming service. These are the same reasons that <i>Paranormal Activity</I> has been so successful and the latest is no exception with it&#8217;s spooky haunted house antics. It&#8217;s not that these movies are great horror stories as much as they&#8217;re just great at creating an atmosphere and scary scenarios. It&#8217;s all about the big &#8220;Boo!&#8221; moments that make these movies much in akin to haunted house rides or roller coasters. I was hesitant about them making this into a franchise but now I love it because the&#8217;ve all been immensely entertaining experiences and a perfect addition to the Halloween season. </p>
<p>Explaining the plot is a little tricky if you haven&#8217;t seen the others considering how closely connected they are. All I&#8217;ll say is that this one is a prequel set in 1988 that basically explains the other two. It primarily focuses on Kristi and Katie (sisters and characters from <i>Paranormal Activity 1 and 2</I>) and Kristi&#8217;s eerie relationship with an &#8220;imaginary&#8221; friend. Naturally their stepdad (who makes wedding videos) is like &#8220;This ain&#8217;t right.&#8221; and sets up cameras around the house, and the next thing you know this shit gets paranormal. <I>PA3</I> continues the trend that less is more but still kicks it up just enough to make the skin crawl. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a nice change of pace to see a horror franchise that&#8217;s still delivering quality material in it&#8217;s third installment. The story is still fresh and is yet to take it too far off the deep end, as a matter of fact this installment faired fairly well with the critics even though the last one was somewhat mixed. I don&#8217;t know if bringing in indie directors Ariel Schulman and Henry Joost (<i>Catfish</I>) made any difference but this one definitely has the most depth out of the three. I enjoyed and sympathized for all the characters and really cared about what was going on and of course the handheld camera style always gives it that nice sense of realism. Which reminds me of how much I now love handicam or &#8220;found footage&#8221; movies, I know a lot of people hate these and think it&#8217;s a fad, but I can&#8217;t get enough of it. </p>
<p>For those of you who may be wondering about the future of this series I think it&#8217;s safe to say that this will not be the last one. In a way that&#8217;s probably not good as they&#8217;re probably going to run out of ways to keep this going at some point, but for now I&#8217;m for it. The second installment ended with a lot of loose ends and this one really didn&#8217;t answer any of them so at least one more would be nice to wrap everything up. Whatever happens I consider myself a strong supporter of this series and will definitely be in line buying a ticket when <i>Paranormal Activity 4</I> opens or <i>P4ranormal Activity</i> or whatever they&#8217;ll call it. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3667</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 28</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3659</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3659#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 16:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alone in the Dark (2005) Fuck that shit.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Alone in the Dark (2005)</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3661" rel="attachment wp-att-3661"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/alone-in-the-dark-movie-poster-2005-1010265829-203x300.jpg" alt="" title="alone-in-the-dark-movie-poster-2005-1010265829" width="199" height="300" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-3661" /></a>Fuck that shit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3659</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 27</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3652</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3652#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 17:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3652</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[House of the Dead (2003) Back when I was but a lad we had a computer in the basement that had House of the Dead on it. Of course the combination of shooting things and zombies instantly won me over and it quickly became my all-time favorite on-rails shooter game. Then this dick you may [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">House of the Dead (2003)</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3654" rel="attachment wp-att-3654"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/13750-207x300.jpg" alt="" title="13750" width="199" height="300" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-3654" /></a>Back when I was but a lad we had a computer in the basement that had <i>House of the Dead</i> on it. Of course the combination of shooting things and zombies instantly won me over and it quickly became my all-time favorite on-rails shooter game. Then this dick you may of heard of named Uwe Boll decided to shit on this beloved arcade franchise by making the worst video game movie I&#8217;ve ever seen. It doesn&#8217;t take a brain surgeon to figure out that an arcade shooter game probably isn&#8217;t the best basis for a film and yet Uwe Boll went forward with this nightmarish rave-centric shlockfest that somehow has an even less structured storyline then the game. As a matter of fact this film doesn&#8217;t seem to be about anything it&#8217;s just a bunch of <i>Matrix</I> wannabe bullshit that simultaneously embarrasses both the action and horror genre. </p>
<p>The setup follows a group of teens who head over to an island for a rave only to discover it&#8217;s been taken over by zombies. The film is over-narrated by some bland guy who thinks he&#8217;s hot shit, I don&#8217;t remember his name, I can&#8217;t remember any of the character&#8217;s names. No one in this movie has any defining characteristics and they only exist so that the film can have a hefty body count. I can barely keep anyone straight except for this one captain played by Jurgen Prochnow named &#8220;Captain Kirk&#8221; which is supposed to be funny but it&#8217;s not at all. Who are these people and what&#8217;s going on? Where&#8217;s the house? I guess they do find a house eventually but it&#8217;s not important enough to the story to justify that title. Maybe something like &#8220;Island of the Dead&#8221; or &#8220;Rave of the Dead&#8221; would of made more sense.</p>
<p>If this film wasn&#8217;t called &#8220;House of the Dead&#8221; I never would of drawn a connection between this and the game series, that&#8217;s how much it deviates. The only thing even remotely connecting the movie and game is that the movie uses very quick clips from the game in-between transitions which makes absolutely no sense at all. Not even the action in this film reminds me of the game, how hard is it to get that part right it&#8217;s god damn shooter?!? This is just a bunch of karate and slow-mo shit, it&#8217;s clearly trying to capitalize off of the success of the <i>Matrix</I> except with none of the same style. Who made this movie a fucking twelve year old? THIS IS A TRAVESTY! HOW CAN THIS BE SO BAD!!!</p>
<p>On top of it all it doesn&#8217;t seem to be about anything, there&#8217;s an island with monsters but why? I guess it&#8217;s because of this bad guy they run into named Castillo? Many years ago Castillo injected himself with an &#8220;immortality serum&#8221; that for some reason exists and so he created the first zombie. Though I have no idea what he&#8217;s trying to accomplish, he&#8217;s just a bad guy cause this movie needed one. All copies of this his film should be burned right now and Uwe Boll should be put to death. I&#8217;m offended not only as a horror fan but as a movie fan and as a rational human being. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3652</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If You&#8217;re Feeling Feisty</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3111</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3111#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 12:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Feist &#8211; Metals I&#8217;ve been waiting for this for a long time. I know a lot of people were sucked into the world of Feist by &#8220;1234,&#8221; but I actually didn&#8217;t get The Reminder until well after those commercials were relevant. The song that did it for me was &#8220;I Feel It All,&#8221; which I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Feist &#8211; <em>Metals</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3112" rel="attachment wp-att-3112"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-3112" title="Feist_Metals" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Feist_Metals-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>I&#8217;ve been waiting for this for a long time. I know a lot of people were sucked into the world of Feist by &#8220;1234,&#8221; but I actually didn&#8217;t get <em>The Reminder </em>until well after those commercials were relevant. The song that did it for me was &#8220;I Feel It All,&#8221; which I still maintain is her best song and a pretty great music video. Then I got into Broken Social Scene and realized I liked Feist even more. Alas, a new Feist album seemed to be ever looming on the horizon, never within reach. Well, <em>Metals </em>finally showed up this month and while it&#8217;s not as revolutionary as I might have hoped, it&#8217;s certainly not something to be missed.</p>
<p>Probably the most important thing you need to know about <em>Metals </em>is that you will never hear any song from it in an iPod commercial. Firstly, because they don&#8217;t make iPod commercials anymore and Apple doesn&#8217;t really double dip anyway. Secondly, because this album is entirely devoid of poppy hits-in-waiting. <em>Metals </em>is a soft album. So soft, if we didn&#8217;t have microphones, you&#8217;d probably have to be standing right in front of Feist just to hear her voice. And come on, we all know you&#8217;d be pretty embarrassed in that situation.</p>
<p>Thanks to iTunes, a lot of people are wondering if the album is a dying idea. <em>Metals </em>serves as a reminder for why the album is a great concept. If Feist had just come out with a single, no matter what track she chose, it would lose in comparison to &#8220;1234.&#8221; Instead, she got put out a whole bunch of songs, still lose in comparison to &#8220;1234&#8243; and keep me and people like me quite happy.</p>
<p><strong>Favorite Tracks: </strong>&#8220;The Bad in Each Other,&#8221; &#8220;The Circle Married the Line,&#8221; &#8220;Bittersweet Melodies&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3111</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Best Thing to Come from The Polyphonic Spree</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3107</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3107#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 12:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[St. Vincent &#8211; Strange Mercy Baroque pop is a silly term. Moving on, the first St. Vincent album I heard was Actor, her second record. I really liked the first song, &#8220;The Strangers,&#8221; but the rest of it didn&#8217;t really stick with me. Why that is is probably worth investigation and analysis, but I have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">St. Vincent &#8211; <em>Strange Mercy</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3108" rel="attachment wp-att-3108"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-3108" title="StrangeMercy" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/StrangeMercy-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Baroque pop is a silly term. Moving on, the first St. Vincent album I heard was <em>Actor</em>, her second record. I really liked the first song, &#8220;The Strangers,&#8221; but the rest of it didn&#8217;t really stick with me. Why that is is probably worth investigation and analysis, but I have not the time nor the desire to really dig into <em>Actor </em>once more. I can tell you I have a strong memory associated with it riding a train in Paris, but that&#8217;s neither here nor there. I&#8217;ve just used &#8220;nor&#8221; two sentences in a row, so you can tell I&#8217;ve got a lot of positive things to say about <em>Strange Mercy, </em>St. Vincent&#8217;s third album.</p>
<p>It all starts with a song called &#8220;Chloe in the Afternoon,&#8221; a jarring, distorted number that seems to be about bondage or some other deviant activity with horse-hair whips and heels. Then we move on to &#8220;Cruel,&#8221; a surprisingly jaunty tune about well, I think you can guess. It&#8217;s these juxtapositions that serve as <em>Strange Mercy</em>&#8216;s greatest strength, songs are equally likely to feature a chunky-as-hell guitar as they are a beautiful, ripped-from-a-musical string section. St. Vincent is doing something, perhaps not unheard of, but certainly distinct.</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t an easy album, in that if you listen to the lyrics, it sounds like St. Vincent is going through a bit of an existential crisis. But damnit, even without listening to the lyrics, this would be an album worth hearing. There&#8217;s a complexity to it that makes it feel like I&#8217;m actually being treated like an adult by my music. And as we push forward in these depressing times, maybe it&#8217;s good to be reminded that there&#8217;s more to music than the escapism of shuffling along to &#8220;Party Rock Anthem.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>Favorite Tracks: </strong>&#8220;Cruel,&#8221; &#8220;Northern Lights,&#8221; &#8220;Year of the Tiger&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3107</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Within and Without You</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3097</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3097#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 11:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Washed Out &#8211; Within and Without I&#8217;ve been listening to Within and Without by Washed Out for the past few months and it&#8217;s probably one of my favorites of the year. That means I should probably write something about it. So, here I am, writing about music again. It feels&#8230; uncomfortable. Not just because I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Washed Out &#8211; <em>Within and Without</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3098" rel="attachment wp-att-3098"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-3098" title="Print" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Washed_out-within_and_without-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>I&#8217;ve been listening to <em>Within and Without </em>by Washed Out for the past few months and it&#8217;s probably one of my favorites of the year. That means I should probably write something about it. So, here I am, writing about music again. It feels&#8230; uncomfortable. Not just because I haven&#8217;t done it in a while, but because Washed Out&#8217;s genre, chillwave, is one that is designed not to inspire. It&#8217;s the minimalistic music of the recession-era, or at least that&#8217;s what Wikipedia tells me.</p>
<p>Wikipedia tells me some other perplexing things. It tells me chillwave music is meant to be danced to, but frankly the idea of a chillwave dance is ghastly. It also tells me Panda Bear is basically the father of the genre and he has a new album out this year too, called <em>Tomboy</em>. But, while I recognize the similarities between Panda Bear and Washed Out and fully understand how people could called Washed Out derivative, it&#8217;s <em>Within and Without </em>that really stuck with me this year, not <em>Tomboy</em>.</p>
<p>As I think music like this probably should, <em>Within and Without </em>has a very clean sound to it. Most every song starts simple and builds up. That&#8217;s a really generic sentence, but I&#8217;m leaving it in. At times I was reminded of Animal Collective or Beach House as I listened to these carefully arranged electronic sounds overcome me. And while certainly a few tracks stood out to me, I really feel the album is best taken as a whole. It&#8217;s super pleasant to listen to, one of my favorites for driving or working. That&#8217;s all I want out of music, most of the time. Something pleasant to keep me company in the world.</p>
<p><strong>Favorite Tracks: </strong>&#8220;Eyes Be Closed,&#8221; &#8220;Before,&#8221; &#8220;A Dedication&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3097</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 26</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3597</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3597#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 07:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3597</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jason X (2001) I saw this film when it was still new to home video (sure sounds weird to say that now) and even back then I thought it was one of the dumbest things I&#8217;d ever seen, though I was 13 and you know how cynical teenagers can be. But no seriously this has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Jason X (2001)</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/jasonx-212x300.jpg" alt="" title="jasonx" width="212" height="300" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-3599" /></a>I saw this film when it was still new to home video (sure sounds weird to say that now) and even back then I thought it was one of the dumbest things I&#8217;d ever seen, though I was 13 and you know how cynical teenagers can be. But no seriously this has to be the worst installment of <i>The Friday the 13th</I> series, true I&#8217;ve probably only seen about four of them but as we all know space is always a last ditch attempt for a dying franchise. As if Jason wasn&#8217;t already hard enough to kill in earlier entries this time he becomes a cyborg half way into the movie after a medical station like rebuilds him? I try not to think about it because it gives me brain damage, but let&#8217;s see what if anything I can still recall. </p>
<p>So Jason (Kane Hodder) is captured by the U.S. Government in 2008 and after several failed attempts to kill him they decide to cryogenically freeze him in the distant year of 2010. 445 years later on the new planet Earth 2, a group of students and their android friend take a field trip to Jason&#8217;s research facility and find Jason frozen along with Rowan LaFontaine (Lexa Doig) a government scientist, so the students decide to take back both of them to their spaceship. Of course as we all know coming into any kind of contact with Jason means certain death and that&#8217;s basically what happens, it&#8217;s new packaging but still the same old shit inside. </p>
<p>There&#8217;s a few new elements to this installment like androids, some kind of alternate reality simulator that takes Jason back to Crystal Lake, and robo-Jason but really it&#8217;s another desperate attempt to reignite a dying franchise. I think you can already predict that it ends with Jason being sucked into the space but what does it matter? They&#8217;re just gonna keep making these so why should I care about anything that happens in these movies? As a matter of fact they did another installment just two years later with <i>Freddy vs. Jason</I>. I get why other horror franchises like <i>Nightmare on Elm Street</I> have had a lot of sequels. <I>Nightmare</I> has lots of possibilities with the dream world and a charismatic villain, but what does <i>Friday the 13th</I> have? It&#8217;s just another mute moron killing machine with literally no personality or interesting characteristics and what, there&#8217;s like 12 of them? Whatever, fuck this shit this is pissing me off!</p>
<p>I should probably post some pic or video or something but whatever I&#8217;m too pissed off. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3597</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Old Balls</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3578</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3578#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 02:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Moneyball Moneyball was an interesting experience for me. When I first heard they were turning the hit book into a movie, I was halfway through a book entitled The Book. That book is a straight up text book read, and although it&#8217;s extremely well written and interesting, it is definitely not an easy read. There are no stories, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span style="font-size: x-large;"><em>Moneyball</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3592" rel="attachment wp-att-3592"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-3592" title="MONEYBALL-movie-poster" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/MONEYBALL-movie-poster-202x300.jpg" alt="" width="202" height="300" /></a>Moneyball was an interesting experience for me. When I first heard they were turning the hit book into a movie, I was halfway through a book entitled <em>The Book</em>. That book is a straight up text book read, and although it&#8217;s extremely well written and interesting, it is definitely not an easy read. There are no stories, no background, no people or characters, just numbers. Pages and pages of charts and tables, while educational, can lull you to sleep.</p>
<p>That is always the false impression I&#8217;d gathered from people talking about Moneyball. So when the rumors of a movie came out, I didn&#8217;t think it was going to work, but I was still very excited. Because, you know, baseball.</p>
<p>When started the book, I was amazed. Not that it was the greatest thing I&#8217;ve ever read, but it wasn&#8217;t a textbook! There were characters! Michael Lewis does a great job setting the scene of Billy&#8217;s past, the draft room, the video room, it&#8217;s all clear in my mind. There are, of course, more number heavy sections, like when he&#8217;s explaining fielding metrics and the different statistic companies that arose independently. But all these gory details could easily be eliminated for the big screen without taking away from the book, and it worked well.</p>
<p>The only real problems I had with the movie were when sometimes it was a little too obvious that they were cramming ideas from the book into made-up scenes from the movie. The most obvious part to me for instance, was the whole David Justice being old balls. In the book, it&#8217;s easier for Michael Lewis to just explain to the readers who David Justice is, and how his balls are old and slow. But without a narrator, they had to try to cram it in by having some bimbo TV reporter be like, &#8220;Hey, I heard you suck and are old as balls, is that true? How are you going to be able to play with such old balls?&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m paraphrasing obviously, but the way the TV reporter acted took me right out of it, because TV reporters are little pussies, and would never say something that direct and upfront. Maybe if they had an <a title="Marcus Thames Column" href="http://articles.latimes.com/2011/mar/21/sports/la-sp-simers-20110322">old crusty columnist</a>, it would have worked better.</p>
<p>I wasn&#8217;t a huge fan of Brad Pitt in the role, even though he won me over more and more as the movie went on. I thought the movie as a whole kind of portrayed Beane as dumber than he really is, and I felt it made him seem like every idea was Jonah Hills, even though I thought Beane had been interested in Bill James before he met DePodesta, but I could be wrong.</p>
<p>Overall, I really liked the movie, and when it comes to baseball movies, it&#8217;s probably my favorite. It combines my interest with sabermetrics and my love of baseball, to something I think we all love, a good underdog story. Despite how I can&#8217;t stand the A&#8217;s and how boring they are and how they are, or the fact they are division rivals, it&#8217;s still a great movie and I&#8217;m glad it came together how it did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3578</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>C.A.T: The Number of the Beast</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3566</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3566#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 21:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Iron Maiden &#8211; The Number of the Beast (1982) A lot of the albums I&#8217;ve reviewed this month have been on the border between hard rock and heavy metal, this album is full on metal. Though I&#8217;m certainly no metal head I have respect for the musicianship that goes into the genre and will admit that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Iron Maiden &#8211; <em>The Number of the Beast</em> (1982)</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3568" rel="attachment wp-att-3568"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Iron_Maiden_The_Number_Of_The_Beast_music_album_cover-150x150.jpg" alt="" title="Iron_Maiden_The_Number_Of_The_Beast_music_album_cover" width="150" height="150" class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-3568" /></a>A lot of the albums I&#8217;ve reviewed this month have been on the border between hard rock and heavy metal, this album is full on metal. Though I&#8217;m certainly no metal head I have respect for the musicianship that goes into the genre and will admit that it&#8217;s good for some good careless fun from time to time. What stands out about this album over other metal albums is it&#8217;s accessibility in crafting catchy tracks without losing any edge. Not to mention the legendary Bruce Dickinson debuted with the group on this album and man does he soar with those operatic-like metal vocals of his. I know Nancy is all about this album so I dedicate this one to him. </p>
<p>The third album from <em>Maiden</em>, <em>Number of the Beast</em> was a critical and commercial standout in 1982 but was just as well known at the time for all of the stories of apparent evil-like phenomena that occurred during the album&#8217;s recording. Though that&#8217;s what happen when you write about and worship the devil right? This theme of &#8220;evilness&#8221; is clearly apparent in <em>Number of the Beast</em> and is probably the reason I find myself reviewing this album during Shocktober. Tracks with names like; &#8220;Number of the Beast&#8221;, &#8220;Children of the Damned&#8221;, &#8220;Invaders&#8221;, &#8220;Hallowed Be Thy Name&#8221;? It just couldn&#8217;t be more perfect when paired with this spooky season.</p>
<p>Dickinson really wails on the vocals and the rest of the musicianship is tight but after listening to the album and watching  it&#8217;s episode of <i>Classic Albums</I> (still on Youtube last time I checked) I have a lot of respect for bassist Steve Harris. Not only is Harris the main creative force behind the band but he actually manages to show off his chops despite playing alongside two talented metal guitarists. I feel like if you can hear the bass at all in metal it&#8217;s a plus but he&#8217;s got some great moments on this album.</p>
<p>After hearing an album like this I think you can understand why metal-heads head bang. There simply isn&#8217;t any other human reaction more suitable to go along with the music than bobbing up and down after hearing songs like &#8220;The Prisoner&#8221; or either of the album&#8217;s two biggest classics. &#8220;Number of the Beast&#8221; and &#8220;Run to the Hills&#8221;, man those are something I can only smile at the craziness of those two metal anthems. A couple of nights ago I was walking around campus with a foam rubber Thor hammer in my hand listening to &#8220;Number of the Beast&#8221; and I got to tell ya, it was a sensation that simply transcended awesomeness.</p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;The Number of the Beast&#8221;, &#8220;The Prisoner&#8221;, &#8220;Run to the Hills&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3566</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 25</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3559</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3559#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 17:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anaconda (1997) I remember hearing about this movie when my mom and stepdad went to go see this in theaters in 1997. It started out promising enough but by at about the midpoint everyone in the theater was cheering for the snake to kill everybody and I think I see why. It&#8217;s not that the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Anaconda (1997)</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3561" rel="attachment wp-att-3561"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/anaconda_1997-210x300.jpg" alt="" title="anaconda_1997" width="199" height="300" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-3561" /></a>I remember hearing about this movie when my mom and stepdad went to go see this in theaters in 1997. It started out promising enough but by at about the midpoint everyone in the theater was cheering for the snake to kill everybody and I think I see why. It&#8217;s not that the cast is that bad, quite the contrary, it&#8217;s a solid lineup including; Jennifer Lopez, Ice Cube, Eric Stoltz, Owen Wilson, Jonathan Hyde, and Jon Voight, but there&#8217;s something that&#8217;s undeniably satisfying about watching all of these people get murdered by a big ass snake. <i>Anaconda</I>, unlike many of the other film&#8217;s I&#8217;ve reviewed recently is a fairly competent production it just all turned out really campy, but hey that doesn&#8217;t mean it can&#8217;t be entertaining. </p>
<p>A National Geographic film crew headed by director Terri Flores (Jennifer Lopez) is heading out to the Amazon River to shoot a documentary about a long lost indian tribe that we never learn anything about. The film crew includes; Steve Cale (Eric Stoltz) a dashing anthropologist, a stereotypical black cameraman Danny (Ice Cube), a production manager Denise (Kari Wuhrer) who&#8217;s got a serious thing going with sound engineer Gary (Owen WIlson), Mateo (Vincent Castellanos) the ship&#8217;s captain, and Warren Westridge (Jonathan Hyde) who appears to be some sort of David Attenbourough-like documentary host. During a storm on the Amazon the crew encounters a mysterious Paraguay snake hunter Sarone (Jon Voight) who&#8217;s been stranded on the river. I don&#8217;t really know what people from Paraguay sound-like but Jon Voight sounds exactly like Mandy Patinkin from <i>The Princess Bride</I> and that&#8217;s awesome, he&#8217;s easily the best part of the movie with his eccentricities and burning desire for the hunt. </p>
<p>What the crew doesn&#8217;t learn until later is that all Sarone cares about is tracking down and killing a giant Green Anaconda that&#8217;s been terrorizing the area. Sarone then takes control of the crew after team leader Eric Stoltz is stung in the throat by a wasp and goes into a coma for the rest of the movie. So why is Eric Stoltz in this at all? He has about 15 minutes of screen time if that and then he&#8217;s out like a light, what&#8217;s the deal? At least the film is pretty quick to the point when it comes to the reveal of the Anaconda. We see it early on and all the time as it seems to hunt down and kill off the crew one at a time. It&#8217;s funny that the crew is supposed to be hunting the snake after Sarone takes over but it&#8217;s really the other way around. Though I don&#8217;t blame the fact these people have so much trouble hunting this anaconda cause the thing practically has superpowers. Every time it shows up it just seems to whip around at incredible speeds almost like it&#8217;s flying from one place to another, it&#8217;s insane. </p>
<p>Anaconda was made in that strange transition period from animatronics to full CGI so it&#8217;s a little odd. The animatronics are good enough but all the CGI is just so terrible they should of held back a little. We may see the snake a great deal, which is fun but at the same time it&#8217;s one of the film&#8217;s biggest downfalls. Take <i>Jaws</I>, clearly the inspiration for this knockoff, you practically never saw the monster and it was terrifying. The snake attacks in this film are just so ridiculous that you can&#8217;t take any of it seriously. Though that all aside this isn&#8217;t a terrible movie it&#8217;s just really dumb, though what do you expect it&#8217;s about a giant snake that kills people.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s an awesome scene of the anaconda killing Jon Voight.<br />
<iframe width="479" height="355" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/7AsrkE_VpgA?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3559</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 24</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3545</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3545#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 16:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Mangler (1995) Oh how the mighty had fallen with Tobe Hooper&#8217;s (Texas Chainsaw Massacre, Poltergeist) adaptation of this little Stephen King short story. Though Hooper&#8217;s career had been on the decline throughout most of the 80s this seemed to be the final nail in the coffin for his career in mainstream cinema. The film [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">The Mangler (1995)</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3547" rel="attachment wp-att-3547"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/A70-4562-197x300.jpg" alt="" title="A70-4562" width="199" height="300" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-3547" /></a>Oh how the mighty had fallen with Tobe Hooper&#8217;s (<i>Texas Chainsaw Massacre</I>, <i>Poltergeist</I>) adaptation of this little Stephen King short story. Though Hooper&#8217;s career had been on the decline throughout most of the 80s this seemed to be the final nail in the coffin for his career in mainstream cinema. The film was <i>The Mangler</I>, originally a short story published in Stephen King&#8217;s 1978 collection <i>Night Shift</I>. I&#8217;ve read and enjoyed <i>Night Shift</I> for many years but I&#8217;ve never understood why all the movies that have been adapted from stories in <i>Night Shift</i> have been so disappointing. <i>Sometimes They Come Back (1991)</I> was considered underwhelming, <i>Graveyard Shift</I> adapted for the screen in 1990 eliminated the scariest part of the story, &#8220;The Ledge&#8221; and &#8220;Quitters Inc.&#8221; got crammed into the so-so 1985 anthology film <i>Cat&#8217;s Eye</I>, Trucks became the campy King directed <i>Maximum Overdrive</I>, <i>Lawnmower Man</I> became well you know, but that&#8217;s okay the story wasn&#8217;t very good either, and <i>Children of the Corn</I> (although notable) has never been anything special. Is this book cursed when it comes to being adapted for the big screen? I mean take King&#8217;s 1982 short story collection <i>Different Seasons</I>. Three of the four stories have become films and you know what they were? <I>Apt Pupil</I> (mildly enjoyable), <i>Stand By Me</I> (awesome) and <i>The Shawshank Redemption</i> (also awesome). What&#8217;s wrong with <i>Night Shift</I>? And why did <i>The Mangler</I> have to get made?</p>
<p>To start <i>The Mangler</I> is far from one of King&#8217;s best short stories. He&#8217;s a very gifted writer but even he has been guilty of going too far every once in awhile. By that I mean off the deep end from creepiness into plain silliness, and I always thought this story was a little odd. The premise is that there is an industrial laundry folding machine in a factory that is possessed by a demon. That&#8217;s right, a laundry machine… Sure it&#8217;s a cool setting and we&#8217;ve probably all had that moment where we imagine an intimidating inanimate object coming to life, but it&#8217;s far from one of King&#8217;s moreclever works. Though at least when King did it, it was just a short story, this is an entire movie that&#8217;s as dull as Dilbert and never seems to end. </p>
<p>A very hard to understand Ted Levine stars as Officer John Hunton, a surly detective investigating an accident at a laundry service owned by the eccentric Bill Gartley (Robert Englund) who has like weird crutch legs. When a dark aura surrounding the factory starts to get to Hunton he soon turns to his hippie brother-in-law who is like &#8220;It must be a demon.&#8221; There really isn&#8217;t any reason to ever believe this but Hunton does and they spend the rest of the movie trying to to exorcise the machine while uncovering it&#8217;s dark past. it&#8217;s all very dumb and very dull with the only highlight being Robert Englund giving an entertaining performance as the eccentric old Gartley. I&#8217;ve always felt kind of bad for Robert Englund, sure he&#8217;s made a name for himself playing Freddy Krueger and for starring in other notable horror roles but he&#8217;s actually a pretty good actor. He&#8217;s classically trained and yet he&#8217;s been stuck to doing mostly subpar horror movies his whole life, oh well just a thought. </p>
<p>Maybe <i>The Mangler</I> could of worked as a short 40 something minute TV special, maybe, unfortunately we got this pointless shlocky thriller just trying to capitalize off of King&#8217;s name. I didn&#8217;t like this movie it made me feel.. unclean. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3545</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 23</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3538</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3538#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 21:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Leprechaun (1993) Countless sequels to popular franchises seems to be a staple of the horror genre, not a good one, but whacha gonna do? It&#8217;s wedged in there and it always will be. So what franchises come to mind? Well there&#8217;s Halloween, Nightmare on Elm Street, Friday the 13th and Texas Chainsaw Massacre to name [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Leprechaun (1993)</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3540" rel="attachment wp-att-3540"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/leprechaun-201x300.jpg" alt="" title="leprechaun" width="199" height="300" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-3540" /></a>Countless sequels to popular franchises seems to be a staple of the horror genre, not a good one, but whacha gonna do? It&#8217;s wedged in there and it always will be. So what franchises come to mind? Well there&#8217;s <i>Halloween</I>, <i>Nightmare on Elm Street</I>, <i>Friday the 13th</i> and <i>Texas Chainsaw Massacre</I> to name a few, and then there&#8217;s others like <i>Leprechaun</I>. What separates <i>Leprechaun</I> from these other films? Maybe it&#8217;s the fact that not even the first installment of this franchise is good. I just recently watched this tragedy of a  film and was stunned to learn there are now six installments of this series. Seriously? What is the appeal of this film? I don&#8217;t know! I guess They are probably cheap, no one&#8217;s gonna care if they are bad or good, and Warwick Davis is a nice guy so he&#8217;ll probably take the paycheck most days of the week I mean there&#8217;s only so many roles for dwarf actors. I suppose most <i>Leprechaun</I> fans (if that&#8217;s a real thing) come back for Warwick. It&#8217;s by no means a well written character but he clearly has fun playing this limerick spewing little shit. Maybe they just want to see how far they can take it? I mean he&#8217;s been to Vegas, space, and the hood (twice!) Though enough of me trying to grasp this madness I&#8217;m just here to talk about the first one.</p>
<p>The film opens with a man who&#8217;s returned to his wife claiming to have caught a leprechaun. Naturally she doesn&#8217;t believe him (as any rational person should) but he says he got one and he&#8217;s locked him up in a suitcase. So the woman opens it, the Leprechaun gets out, the Leprechaun kills the woman and the man locks him up again. Honestly I think you could of cut out this whole scene and no one would care, it goes on far too long and is not in anyway exciting. Ten years later we are introduced to J.D. Redding (John Sanderford) and his daughter Torry (Jennifer Aniston, everyone has to start somewhere) as they&#8217;re moving to some crappy farmhouse to the summer. Torry complains about going to some crappy place in &#8220;New Mexico&#8221; to which her father corrects her by saying &#8220;It&#8217;s North Dakota.&#8221; Now I get it she&#8217;s supposed to be snooty, she doesn&#8217;t know about anything about the rest of the country but come on, those places are nowhere near each other. It&#8217;s with lines like this that we begin to prepare for an endless series of jokes in the script that also misfire spectacularly. </p>
<p>On the farm we are introduced to some painters, including Torry&#8217;s strapping young love interest Nathan (Ken Olandt), his wisecracking kid brother Alex (Robert Gorman) and their mentally challenged friend Ozzie (Mark Holton from <i>Pee Wee&#8217;s Big Adventure</i>). Maybe it&#8217;s just me but I find the inclusion of this kid and his retarded friend to be very strange for a horror movie. The two seem to share a kind <i>Of Mice and Men</I> relationship and often make me forget I&#8217;m watching a horror movie. Combined with the cartoonish premise <i>Leprechaun</I> feels more like a Disney Channel original movie (with some blood and occasional profanity) than anything else. </p>
<p>So how does the Leprechaun come into play with these characters? Well the retarded guy finds the chest the Leprechaun was sealed in and releases him. Upon his release the Leprechaun is relentless in the search for his gold which somehow the retarded guy has already found following a rainbow. So it&#8217;s a search for gold complete with terrible Lucky Charms jokes! This sounds like it could be hilarious but most of the kills are surprisingly bland and nothing really funny or interesting happens, it&#8217;s just a big unlucky failure pile. Son that note I&#8217;ll see ya again tomorrow, if I haven&#8217;t already blown my brains out after digesting this travesty. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3538</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 22</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3526</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3526#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 22:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3526</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Troll 2 (1990) Few film&#8217;s legacies have so greatly benefitted from the fact that the film itself was bad. The fact that Troll 2 is so memorably bad probably has done more for the film than if it was even just okay. In recent years Troll 2 has given other crappy classics a run for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Troll 2 (1990)</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3529" rel="attachment wp-att-3529"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/MV5BMTM1OTUzOTM2OV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwMzYxNDY3NA@@._V1._SX640_SY960_1-200x300.jpg" alt="" title="MV5BMTM1OTUzOTM2OV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwMzYxNDY3NA@@._V1._SX640_SY960_" width="199" height="300" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-3529" /></a>Few film&#8217;s legacies have so greatly benefitted from the fact that the film itself was bad. The fact that <i>Troll 2</I> is so memorably bad probably has done more for the film than if it was even just okay. In recent years <i>Troll 2</I> has given other crappy classics a run for their money as the best worst movie. There&#8217;s even a documentary about <i>Troll 2</I> called &#8220;Best Worst Movie&#8221; but more on that later. Like many of the best worst classics <i>Troll 2</I> finds that perfect balance between awkwardness and incompetence, complete with camp, cheese and all the stuff that your worst nightmares are made of. It is a film that is in fact such a calamity that it actually becomes something so delightfully absurd that you simply cannot look away. If someone made a shortlist of the bad movies you needed to see before you die this is a film that may now even be number one, it&#8217;s really something you have to see to believe.</p>
<p>The Waits family is going on vacation, and what better place to stay then in the remote rural town of Nilbog (which is Goblin spelled backwards, nice!) Though the town seems peaceful enough, the young Joshua (Michael Stephenson) is contacted by his dead grandfather and warned that the inhabitants of the town are goblins. Wait a minute goblins? I thought this movie was called &#8220;Troll 2&#8243;, well I&#8217;ll get to that in just a minute. So Nilbog is full of Goblins masquerading as people so that they can turn humans into human/plant hybrids and eat them. Why these goblins can&#8217;t just eat regular vegetation I have no idea. Oh yeah and the daughter (Connie McFarland) of the family&#8217;s boyfriend also comes to Nilbog, gotta have some random characters to kill off right? So the Goblins try to get the family to eat vegetables which will turn them into vegetables, but Joshua retaliates in various ways including a scene where he even pisses on a bunch of food. &#8220;You can&#8217;t piss on hospitality!&#8221; says Michael Waits (George Hardy) the father of the family. Joshua continually tries to warn his family of the townspeople&#8217;s intentions but all hell breaks loose in Nilbog. Anymore and I would be spoiling the magic for anyone who hasn&#8217;t seen the film. </p>
<p>Strangely enough the film was marketed as &#8220;Troll 2&#8243; as an attempt to market it as a sequel to the 1986 film <i>Troll</I>. I suppose sequels make more money? The film is clearly supposed to be about goblins which was the original title. The film was also made by an all Italian crew but somehow ended up with an unknown american cast, filming took place in Utah and the rest is history. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s amazing what kind of cult following this film has attracted over the years and this has all excellently been captured in the entertaining documentary <i>Best Worst Movie</I> released last year and directed by the original film&#8217;s young star Michael Stephenson. The film chronicles the lives of the stars since the films was released (most notably George Hardy) and also gives us a peek into the bizarre fandom this mess has created. I&#8217;d recommend it for anyone who likes quirky documentaries, here&#8217;s the trailer right below.<br />
<iframe width="479" height="273" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/5tFgZ6DmXmw?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3526</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 21</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3514</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3514#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 07:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3514</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Slugs (1988) Just when you thought nothing could top killer rabbits we have yes, Killer slugs. Yeah you heard me KILLER SLUGS or at least stupid people that accidentally kill themselves in the presence of killer slugs. I don&#8217;t know what&#8217;s supposed to be scary about painfully slow gastropods but I guess there&#8217;s only so [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Slugs (1988)</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3517" rel="attachment wp-att-3517"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/sluc1-204x300.jpg" alt="" title="sluc1" width="199" height="300" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-3517" /></a>Just when you thought nothing could top killer rabbits we have yes, Killer slugs. Yeah you heard me KILLER SLUGS or at least stupid people that accidentally kill themselves in the presence of killer slugs. I don&#8217;t know what&#8217;s supposed to be scary about painfully slow gastropods but I guess there&#8217;s only so many animals to choose from. Directed by Juan Piquer Simon (the same mastermind behind <i>The Pod People</I>) <i>Slugs</I>, or as the opening title card calls it &#8220;Slugs: The Movie&#8221; is about a rural town that becomes prey to a strain of toxic slugs. So it&#8217;s up to health worker Mike Brady (yeah that&#8217;s his name) to solve the crisis and put an end to all the slimy madness. </p>
<p>It all begins with perhaps the lamest opening to a horror movie I&#8217;ve ever seen. So there&#8217;s this guy fishing out on a lake bickering with his girlfriend and then suddenly he gets pulled in, fade to black. So what? He got pulled into the lake by a slug? Do slugs swim? And can they really pull down an entire person? This is one movie where I&#8217;m not surprised when people ignore the one guy who says &#8220;It&#8217;s slugs! The slugs are killing people!&#8221; I mean it doesn&#8217;t make any sense. This leads to one of my favorite moments between Mike Brady and the town sherif, the exchange goes a little bit like this. </p>
<p>Mike: So Sherif what do you think?</p>
<p>Sherif: I don&#8217;t know wild dogs maybe? Raccoons driven out of the hills by the cold?</p>
<p>Mike: I don&#8217;t buy that, something that big would of done a lot more damage to the inside of the house.</p>
<p>Sherif: what&#8217;s your bright idea Mr. health inspector? </p>
<p>Mike: Rats maybe?</p>
<p>Sherif: Rats? You willing to go on record with that? </p>
<p>Seriously? You think that guys explanation of rats is stupid? Yeah killer raccoons makes way more sense (though that does sound like a much better movie.) It&#8217;s the little things that seem to invoke a subtle kind of retardation. This movie has so much unintentionally bad dialogue that it&#8217;s no more a bad horror movie than it&#8217;s a great comedy. So unless you&#8217;re scared of being chased by piles of what looks like dog shit you&#8217;ll probably find this film hilarious.</p>
<p>The kills are great and for the most part cleverly done. Though it seems strange that everyone who dies in this movie seems to be more responsible for their own deaths than any of the slugs. People in this movie react in such irrational ways and the thinking process is just plain nonsensical. Though I guess the slugs in this film are tricky, I mean no one ever finds any slugs at the seen of the crime. It&#8217;s as if the slugs are outwitting everyone by slinking off before the authorities arrive and that&#8217;s awesome. One last note before I go, for a movie about slugs there sure are a lot of explosions. </p>
<p>So here&#8217;s a montage of all the best scenes. The editing is kind of annoying but it&#8217;s all there.<br />
<iframe width="479" height="355" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/iPP6CMBVLDw?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3514</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>T3: Really Long Songs</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3494</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3494#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 04:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Ten]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Man, this post required a lot of listening time.  As you&#8217;ve probably gathered, in response to Sean&#8217;s post last week of his favorite short songs, these are my favorite songs that push the 10-minute mark.  My criteria was basically that they all be rock songs, and I decided finally to include live songs, but they [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/chewbaccaguitar.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><p>Man, this post required a lot of listening time.  As you&#8217;ve probably gathered, in response to Sean&#8217;s post last week of his favorite short songs, these are my favorite songs that push the 10-minute mark.  My criteria was basically that they all be rock songs, and I decided finally to include live songs, but they had to be the definitive version of the song, so sorry live version of &#8220;Freebird&#8221;.  I could&#8217;ve done the inverse of Sean&#8217;s writing style by writing multiple paragraphs for each song, but does anyone really want that?  I don&#8217;t.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">10. Neil Young &#8211; &#8220;Cowgirl In The Sand&#8221;</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/-6ibl6PIKPM" frameborder="0" width="479" height="25"></iframe><br />
When Neil Young gets together with Crazy Horse, these kind of long hazy jams just tend to happen.  It&#8217;s kind of cool how Young melds this sweet little love song with his murky guitar antics, which I&#8217;m usually game for.  Man, it&#8217;s been a while since I&#8217;ve listened to Neil Young.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">9. Grateful Dead &#8211; &#8220;Alligator&#8221;</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/_1x_qJi97B0" frameborder="0" width="479" height="25"></iframe><br />
Speaking of artists I haven&#8217;t listened to in a while, here&#8217;s San Francisco&#8217;s premier band of jam-centric hippies.  This song is interesting because it&#8217;s sort of this half-live/half-studio production, complemented by this jazzy percussion breakdown in the middle.  Plus, it&#8217;s got maybe the greatest use of kazoo in any rock song ever.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">8. Sufjan Stevens &#8211; &#8220;Impossible Soul&#8221;</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/8R_3mXZBsuU" frameborder="0" width="479" height="25"></iframe><br />
I know Sean&#8217;s a big fan of this song, so I figured I&#8217;d give it some love.  At over 25 minutes, and dozens of changes in tempo and mood, this song is really quite a journey.  It&#8217;s so damn complex and layered that I&#8217;m not even sure how one would go about writing a song like this, but really it&#8217;s all about the &#8220;Boy We Can Do Much More Together&#8221; section.  That part is pretty sweet.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">7. Funkadelic &#8211; &#8220;Maggot Brain&#8221;</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/12pywl9zNIE" frameborder="0" width="479" height="25"></iframe><br />
I was fairly predisposed to not including lenghty instrumentals on this list, but &#8220;Maggot Brain&#8221; is different.  This is the sound of Eddie Hazel playing an electric guitar with about as much heartwrenching emotion as I&#8217;ve ever heard in a guitar solo.  Supposedly George Clinton told Hazel to play the solo as if his mama had just died, and I hate to say it, but there&#8217;s definitely a mournful quality to his playing.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">6. Elton John &#8211; &#8220;Funeral For A Friend/Love Lies Bleeding&#8221;</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/3p_xAToFzck" frameborder="0" width="479" height="25"></iframe><br />
I tried to keep meddlies off this list, but I think &#8220;Funeral For A Friend&#8221; is such an integral build-up to &#8220;Love Lies Bleeding&#8221; that it&#8217;s hard to separate the two.  This is probably one of my favorite Elton John songs, and it&#8217;s a pretty brilliant example of the man&#8217;s ear for melody, all punched up with a synthy arena rock sound.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">5. Pink Floyd &#8211; &#8220;Shine On You Crazy Diamond (I-IV)&#8221;</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/TQYaVb4px7U" frameborder="0" width="479" height="25"></iframe><br />
This song was supposedly written about former Pink Floyd frontman Syd Barrett, which I guess isn&#8217;t that surprising since it seems like half of Pink Floyd&#8217;s songs are about Syd Barrett.  When I hear this song it reminds me of another man that seemed to be bordering on insanity, my 8th grade science teacher, Mr. Dodge.  He used to always play this song in his class, and as far as I can remember, that was my first exposure to this wonderful 13 minute prog-rock odyssey.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">4. Sigur Ros<em> &#8211; </em>&#8220;Svefn-g-Englar&#8221;</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/rtemrZ7-pj0" frameborder="0" width="479" height="25"></iframe><br />
I can&#8217;t really say I&#8217;ve ever been that into Sigur Ros, but something about this song really does it for me.  And like much of Sigur Ros&#8217;s best material, it&#8217;s hard to exactly put into words what exactly is so great about it.  It&#8217;s just a really fucking beautiful song that sounds otherworldly, and that&#8217;s about all I can say.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">3. The Allman Brothers Band<em> &#8211; </em>&#8220;Whipping Post&#8221;</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/eCtaCO7BOJ4" frameborder="0" width="479" height="25"></iframe><br />
Even though this is a live version, it&#8217;s nonetheless the definitive version of &#8220;Whipping Post&#8221;.  I mean the <em>At Fillmore Eas</em>t version was featured on Rolling Stone&#8217;s 500 Greatest Songs, not an easy feat for something so epic.   I remember mine and Nancy&#8217;s short-lived band Jack Be Quick covered this song live once, and we were exhausted after playing it for about 5 minutes.  Somehow the Allman&#8217;s are able to keep it up for 20, and all of those minutes are about as intense as blues rock jamming gets.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">2. Bob Dylan &#8211; &#8220;Desolation Row&#8221;</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/d9T0zNfO8t0" frameborder="0" width="479" height="25"></iframe><br />
As you&#8217;ve probably noticed, most of these songs rely on lengthy jam sections, but not this one.  &#8221;Desolation Row&#8221; is pretty much wall-to-wall lyrics, and Dylan uses basically all of the song&#8217;s 11 minutes to paint this very detailed picture of all these different characters and bizarre events that are unfolding.  It&#8217;s just an unbelievable document of Dylan&#8217;s incredible peak of creativity in the mid-sixties, and personally it&#8217;s up there as one of my favorite Dylan song.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">1. Television &#8211; &#8220;Marquee Moon&#8221;</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/jlbunmCbTBA" frameborder="0" width="479" height="25"></iframe><br />
I&#8217;m not sure how many hours I&#8217;ve spent listening to &#8220;Marquee Moon&#8221;, but it&#8217;s got to be quite a few.  Television came out of that late &#8217;70s New York punk scene where solos and jamming seemed to be blasphemous, so naturally Television&#8217;s first album has this 10-minute opus as it&#8217;s center piece.  Of course this isn&#8217;t just your typical blues-based classic rock solo, this is a song that incorporates jazz scales and complex key changes.  Basically the punch line is that you can accomplish a lot in ten minutes, and this song manages to sound unlike any other guitar jam I&#8217;ve ever heard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3494</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 20</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3485</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3485#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 16:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hobgoblins (1988) What a shame that I have to phone in this film considering I already phoned it in once on this blog a few October&#8217;s back. That;s too bad because this is one of th more notable bad movies of the 80s, often mentioned around the likes of Troll 2, but I only saw [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Hobgoblins (1988)</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3487" rel="attachment wp-att-3487"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/POSTER-HOBGOBLINS-178x300.jpg" alt="" title="POSTER-HOBGOBLINS" width="199" height="300" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-3487" /></a>What a shame that I have to phone in this film considering I already phoned it in once on this blog a few October&#8217;s back. That;s too bad because this is one of th more notable bad movies of the 80s, often mentioned around the likes of <i>Troll 2</I>, but I only saw it once about eight years ago and I just can&#8217;t bring myself to watching it again. What I can tell you is that if  you&#8217;re ever looking for a good episode of <i>Mystery Science Theater 3000</I> to watch check out this one. Though aside from that my memory is fuzzy. All I can really recall is bunch of shitty puppets that bring people&#8217;s fantasies to life and then attack them and by attack them I mean  you get to watch people being humped to death by stuffed animals. This is another one of the many <i>Gremlins</> knockoffs</I> of the 80s but somehow one of the most notorious, very lame, they even call them gruesome gremlins in the trailer!</p>
<p>The trailer makes this movie look about as good as I remember.<br />
<iframe width="479" height="355" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/o0fhewrzBRM?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3485</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 19</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3472</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3472#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 16:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chopping Mall (1986) First of all awesome title! But that wasn&#8217;t even the original name of this schlocky Roger Corman produced flick. The original title of this movie was &#8220;Killbots&#8221; which is even more awesome! But actually that title is kind of misleading. I don&#8217;t think anyone would guess this is a film about killer [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Chopping Mall (1986)</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3473" rel="attachment wp-att-3473"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/jim-chopping-mall-2-192x300.jpg" alt="" title="jim-chopping-mall-2" width="199" height="300" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-3473" /></a>First of all awesome title! But that wasn&#8217;t even the original name of this schlocky Roger Corman produced flick. The original title of this movie was &#8220;Killbots&#8221; which is even more awesome! But actually that title is kind of misleading. I don&#8217;t think anyone would guess this is a film about killer robots after  hearing the title &#8220;Chopping Mall&#8221;. Not to mention the fact that these killer robots don&#8217;t actually chop anyone up, they use lasers. So not only is the title misleading but it really doesn&#8217;t have anything to do with the movie, but hey it&#8217;s still awesome. </p>
<p>In <i>Chopping Mall</I>, &#8220;The Protectors&#8221; as they&#8217;re called have been invented to replace mall security, providing for a safer mall experience. So after hours they are programmed to pursue anyone without a mall pass and use a series of built-in gadgets to ensure their success. These gadgets include sleeping darts, a taser gun, and lasers that can slice through any kind of debris. Wait a minute, killer lasers? Why would a robot that&#8217;s supposed to be nonviolent have killer lasers? Hmm, well I&#8217;m sure that wont come back to bite anyone in the ass.</p>
<p>Our main cast is a group of horny teens that work at the mall and plan to throw a party the mall closes. There&#8217;s the naive but good hearted chick, the macho guy, the slut, the nerd, all the usual stereotypes and I&#8217;ll be damned if I can remember any of their names. So for whatever reason the teens get trapped in the mall and the robots go rouge and start killing them. Really I can&#8217;t stress that &#8220;whatever reason&#8221; enough because I don&#8217;t know why they became evil. </p>
<p>What I loved about my experience watching <i>Chopping Mall</I> is that it&#8217;s quick to the point. They don&#8217;t pussy foot around trying to make this a serious or even competent story they just get right to what we want to see, teens being killed by robots. It&#8217;s purposefully over-the-top and when there&#8217;s so many b-movies that attempt to actually be good movies, it&#8217;s refreshing to see one that&#8217;s comfortable with being a b-movie. There&#8217;s some great kills and bizarre moments (finding automatic rifle&#8217;s in a store in the mall) it&#8217;s pure cheese and sometimes you just got a craving for some cheese. </p>
<p>Here someone put together a collection of all the death scenes, skim through it if you dare.<br />
<iframe width="479" height="355" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/I95XKH9SRy0?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3472</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>C.A.T: Blizzard of Ozz</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3464</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3464#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 23:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ozzy Osbourne &#8211; Blizzard of Ozz (1981) Recently I was paging through a copy of Horrorhound magazine when I came upon an article about all the best horror themed metal albums of 1981. How someone came up with such a strangely specific article I don&#8217;t know, but even though I don&#8217;t consider myself a metal fan [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Ozzy Osbourne &#8211; <em>Blizzard of Ozz</em> (1981)</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3465" rel="attachment wp-att-3465"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Ozzy_Osbourne_Blizzard_of_Ozz-B000063DFT-150x150.jpg" alt="" title="Ozzy_Osbourne_Blizzard_of_Ozz-B000063DFT" width="150" height="150" class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-3465" /></a>Recently I was paging through a copy of <em>Horrorhound</em> magazine when I came upon an article about all the best horror themed metal albums of 1981. How someone came up with such a strangely specific article I don&#8217;t know, but even though I don&#8217;t consider myself a metal fan I decided it might be fun to check one of them out just for kicks. The list included; <em>Heavy Metal the Soundtrack</em>, the second <em>Iron Maiden</em> album, some album by a band called <em>Venom</em>, two Ozzy-less <em>Sabbath</em> albums and then Ozzy&#8217;s debut solo album and followup record. Though the decision really wasn&#8217;t that difficult when &#8220;Crazy Train&#8221; is one of the tracks on one of those seven albums. So I went for <em>Blizzard of Ozz</em>, the debut solo album from that guy from <em>The Osbournes</em>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve had fun (to some extent) getting into <em>Black Sabbath</em> this year but haven&#8217;t really felt the need to expand my metal music knowledge since then. Of course Ozzy is a big part of why I like <em>Black Sabbath</em> but could I really enjoy the Prince of Darkness without his minions? Surprisingly, Ozzy does alright without his brooding <em>Sabbath</em> rhythm section and talented axe man, of course he is now paired up with an even more talented axe man. Randy Rhoads, who I&#8217;m sure most rock and roll fans have at least heard of was probably one of the most talented hard rock guitarists of his time. Even though his recording career only spanned roughly six years before his untimely death at 25, he made his mark as one of the most technically proficient shred heads ever. Though Rhoads also played in the original lineup of <em>Quiet Riot</em> he is perhaps best known as the reason Ozzy even had a solo career early on. So together with the Prince of Darkness and bassist Bob Daisley, the three penned a solid album&#8217;s worth of hard rock gems.</p>
<p>Songs on <em>Blizzard</em> naturally depict gothic imagery with tunes like &#8220;Suicide Solution&#8221;, &#8220;No Bone Movies&#8221; and of course &#8220;Mr. Crowley&#8221;. So it&#8217;s quite appropriate for the season and still very in tune with what Ozzy did in <i>Sabbath</I>. Though Ozzy has never considered himself much of a songwriter I think he really shines here with the kind of melodies not often seen in the same genre that gave us some of the shittiest bands ever. Ozzy has always been a self-proclaimed <em>Beatles</em> nut which has definitely seemed to bring forth the melody man in him, and he shows this off in songs like the hit &#8220;Crazy Train&#8221; and the surprisingly pleasant ballad &#8220;Goodbye to Romance&#8221;.</p>
<p>This album isn&#8217;t perfect, I don&#8217;t know who thought synthesizers were a good idea in metal music, but it&#8217;s competently produced, entertaining, and well executed. So guess I did enjoy my brief journey into the Prince of Darkness&#8217; little world but I think I&#8217;ll head back now, it&#8217;s too scary in there.</p>
<p><strong>Favorite Tracks:</strong> &#8220;Crazy Train&#8221;, &#8220;Goodbye to Romance&#8221;, &#8220;Revelation (Mother Earth)&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3464</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 18</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3452</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3452#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Pod People (1983) I&#8217;ve seen my fair share of bad horror movies but too often I find that some of the most irritating are the foreign horror films. I&#8217;m talking about the kind of films that are quickly and poorly hobbled together, sloppily dubbed and then shipped out to the US market. The kind [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">The Pod People (1983)</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3454" rel="attachment wp-att-3454"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Pod-People.jpg" alt="" title="Pod People" width="199" height="300" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-3454" /></a>I&#8217;ve seen my fair share of bad horror movies but too often I find that some of the most irritating are the foreign horror films. I&#8217;m talking about the kind of films that are quickly and poorly hobbled together, sloppily dubbed and then shipped out to the US market. The kind of films where you wonder if anyone really had a firm grasp of any language when making it. Though perhaps the more puzzling query is &#8220;What is <i>The Pod People</I> supposed to be about?&#8221;</p>
<p>First of all <i>The Pod People</I> is not about Pod People and I have no idea why his film is called <i>The Pod People</I>. The actual title of this Spanish sci-fi flick is <i>Los Neuvos Extraterrestres</i> or <i>The New Extraterrestrials</I>. Originally planned as a horrific alien thriller the success of <i>E.T.</I> drove the producers to also make it the story of an innocent boy and his friendly alien pal. Filled with pointless subplots, inane dialogue, and far too many pointless scenery cutaways, watching this film is worse than any kind of probe. </p>
<p>The film opens with the credits superimposed over footage of what appears to be some homemade alien monster movie. Though for whatever reason this footage of men fighting aliens in the woods is in fact from another movie called <i>Galaxy Invader</i>. How this happened I have no idea as not only is it completely irrelevant but the footage is so bad. After this we are introduced to a trio of egg poachers out in the woods looking for nightingale eggs, which I guess must be worth some money to someone. One of the poachers then wanders off after supposedly seeing something in the sky and soon stumbles upon an eerie cave. Inside the cave is a collection of large eggs, the man smashes one open and discovers a gross fetus. So without even considering that these eggs may be worth something, Mr. Dumbest Egg Poacher in the world starts to smash all the eggs which awakens an unseen monster that kills him. </p>
<p>The other two poachers continue to meander through what looks like the foggiest woods on Earth while each following scene seems to go back and forth between day and night. I seem to recall one guy even says &#8220;Don&#8217;t take all night!&#8221; when it&#8217;s clearly day. Moving away from these poachers we are introduced to a young boy living nearby in a house in the woods who is awoken by some mysterious lightning outside. The boy named Tommy also appears to collect animals as a hobby and lives with his mom and douchebag uncle. Tommy also sounds like he&#8217;s voiced by an adult Italian woman but hey why not? So we get a couple more shots of the poachers again and then the next thing you know were in some kind of recording studio. </p>
<p>Here we have Rick, a hot recording artist busy in the studio working on some song singing &#8220;Hear the Engines Roll, Now!&#8221; Though it sounds more like &#8220;Idiot Control Now!&#8221; This segment of the film was well covered in an episode of <i>Mystery Science Theater 3000</i>. Before we have any idea what this scene has to do with anything were back to the woods again following two characters that are taking the film nowhere. </p>
<p>Skipping ahead Rick (who&#8217;s a complete douchebag) and his studio friends travel out to go camping in the woods, Oh, now I see why they&#8217;re in this movie. It&#8217;s at this point in the film that I could swear some of the characters voices are constantly changing from the dubbing process but I don&#8217;t know, there&#8217;s definitely something going on there. Back to Tommy and we see that he&#8217;s discovered the mysterious egg cave and found one egg left behind. Tommy also discovers the dead body of one of the poachers and runs from the cave in terror, though I don&#8217;t believe he ever tells anyone about the dead body. </p>
<p>Tommy goes home and starts to care for the egg until it hatches into some kind of miniature Alf-like alien that the kid names &#8220;Trumpy&#8221;, here is where the <i>E.T.</i> element enters the film. Then in a SINGLE CUTAWAY the alien grows to the size of a dwarf in a costume and shows the kid his stupid magic powers. Skipping ahead again Rick and his stupid friends get ridiculed by the mother alien and make their way to Tommy&#8217;s house. This is where the rest of the film basically becomes your typical monster/slasher B-movie. As I&#8217;m growing weary of plot synopsis I believe it ended with Trumpy&#8217;s mom and a lot of others being killed and then some more footage from <i>Galaxy Invader</I>. What this all results in is a movie that&#8217;s part monster movie part kids movie and all terrible! </p>
<p>Trumpy and friends!<br />
<a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3455" rel="attachment wp-att-3455"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/pod_people.png" alt="" title="pod_people" width="430" height="305" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3455" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3452</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 17</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3414</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3414#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Basket Case (1982) Some might say the selection of Basket Case was a a misstep on my part. Most of the film&#8217;s I&#8217;ve selected for &#8220;Shocktober&#8221; or &#8220;Shlocktober&#8221; have bee universally panned, but this one not as much as I thought. Sure I found it on many web columnists&#8217; and blogger&#8217;s &#8220;Top Ten Worst Horror [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Basket Case (1982)</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3417" rel="attachment wp-att-3417"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/basket-case-movie-poster11-203x300.jpg" alt="" title="basket-case-movie-poster1" width="199" height="300" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-3417" /></a>Some might say the selection of <i>Basket Case</I> was a a misstep on my part. Most of the film&#8217;s I&#8217;ve selected for &#8220;Shocktober&#8221; or &#8220;Shlocktober&#8221; have bee universally panned, but this one not as much as I thought. Sure I found it on many web columnists&#8217; and blogger&#8217;s &#8220;Top Ten Worst Horror Movies Lists&#8221; but I was shocked when I found that the usually dependable rating site/my filmgoing bible Rotten Tomatoes gave this film a 79%. Sure it&#8217;s only out of 19 reviews but still, does this film belong here? It all depends on what I use to declare a movie as bad and though this is probably the best movie I&#8217;ve seen for this series that&#8217;s not saying much.</p>
<p>Considering this film is so low budget there&#8217;s a lot to appreciate in <i>Basket Case</I>. It&#8217;s a quirky and somewhat interesting story with a few nice laughs but at the same time I can&#8217;t get over the film&#8217;s monster. I think it helps to know your boundaries in independent filmmaking, know what will look good and what won&#8217;t and this film doesn&#8217;t seem to recognize that. Director Frank Henenlotter (a self proclaimed exploitation filmmaker) claims this movie is a dark comedy but still I wonder. Is Henenlotter just saying that because it turned out so ridiculous? Because if this is supposed to be a comedy it&#8217;s a tad off balance. </p>
<p><i>Basket Case</I> is the story of Duane Bradley a seemingly nice if not naive young man who arrives in New York City with a large basket. What&#8217;s in the basket? Why it&#8217;s his parasitic twin that he shares a telepathic link with of course. Duane has arrived in the big city to get revenge on the all the doctors who separated him and his still living twin Belial when they were children. Well really it&#8217;s Belial who gets the revenge, despite the fact that he&#8217;s just a big hunk of mangled flesh. Complications arise when Duane starts to get a taste of life without Belial, going out on dates and what not, this of course leads to many new corpses. </p>
<p>&#8220;So he has a parasitic twin in a basket? That sounds terrible!&#8221; Well yes, the Beliali puppet (which on one occasion is stop motion) is one of the dumbest monsters I&#8217;ve ever seen. How can something without legs or even certain organs for that matter overpower and kill people, or do anything for that matter? It just looks so bad, what the hell is that thing? Duane describes it as looking like &#8220;a squashed octopus&#8221; that takes a little imagination but it&#8217;s a start. </p>
<p>Maybe this is a dark comedy but if it is I think it missed some opportunities. The idea that I&#8217;m supposed to take any of the non humorous moments as serious is a stretch. This is some kind of weird shlocky mish mash of horror and comedy that has it&#8217;s high and low points, not too bad but nothing I ever wanna see again. </p>
<p>And below we have pic of Belial in all his glory.</p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3422" rel="attachment wp-att-3422"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/basket-case.jpg" alt="" title="basket-case" width="440" height="289" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3422" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3414</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 16</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3400</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3400#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 08:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Galaxy of Terror (1981) Were taking a trip back to Roger Corman&#8217;s film school with this one. Known as the King of B-movies, Roger Corman has directed and produced countless B-movies (good and bad) on shoestring budgets for many years and has also trained some of Hollywood&#8217;s best along the way. Everyone from Francis Ford [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Galaxy of Terror (1981)</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3402" rel="attachment wp-att-3402"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/galaxy_of_terror_poster_02-203x300.jpg" alt="" title="galaxy_of_terror_poster_02" width="199" height="300" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-3402" /></a>Were taking a trip back to Roger Corman&#8217;s film school with this one. Known as the King of B-movies, Roger Corman has directed and produced countless B-movies (good and bad) on shoestring budgets for many years and has also trained some of Hollywood&#8217;s best along the way. Everyone from Francis Ford Coppola to Martin Scorsese started out working for Corman and today&#8217;s film is no exception as features the talents of who else but Jame Cameron. Yes, James Cameron worked on <i>Galaxy of Terror</I> as both a production designer and second unit director, but even with all his technical prowess not even he could save this film forever lost in space. </p>
<p>Cameron&#8217;s clearly done his part here as the film looks great with some cheesy but amusing effects, the problem here is the story or lack thereof. I think it&#8217;s pretty clear that this film is just a ripoff of Ridley Scott&#8217;s <i>Alien</I> and while they did a good job of putting together some atmospheric sets they should of put more of that effort into crafting an interesting and unique story, ya know something that doesn&#8217;t suck. The cast is made up of all sorts of cult b-movie stars including; Sid Haig, Robert Englund in a rare non villain role, and Taaffe O&#8217;Connell in her career defining role as a technical officer who gets raped by a giant space worm. Additional cast includes Edward Albert (son of Eddie Albert from <i>Green Acres</I>) and Ray Walston (<i>My Favorite Martian</I>, <i>Fast Times at Ridgemont High</I>). All these actors and a few more makeup the members of a spaceship crew who &#8220;accidentally&#8221; crash land on the gritty planet Morganthus. </p>
<p>What kind of shit goes down on Morganthus? Mostly a bunch of wandering around to moody synth music. This I don&#8217;t mind too much, it does build suspense but it always seems to fizzle out when the film tries to show off it&#8217;s underwhelming alien antagonists. The poster shows some kind of Skeleton-faced dragon thing but I don&#8217;t recall anything like that in the film. I thought I might of once but for the most part you never really get a very good look at any of the alien puppets. The only ones we do get a good look at are these shitty little worm puppets that make really stupid cartoon noises. Oh yeah and some of the aliens can shape shift into various things like people and um glass, hmm. These aliens are far from the worst I&#8217;ve seen in a b-movie but when everything else looks so good it really takes me out of the movie. </p>
<p>So crew members get picked off one by one until we finally discover (<b>Spoiler</b>) that Ray Walston is this guy called &#8220;The Master&#8221; with a glowing red head and that this planet (specifically this one magic pyramid on the planet) is a training ground to test and control fear, which is totally stupid. So Edward Albert (sporting a very Burt Reynolds mustache) shoots him with lasers but then he becomes &#8220;The Master&#8221;? Wow this is so dumb, they couldn&#8217;t of just made it a straightforward sci-fi with a competent plot? </p>
<p>Another thing I have to address before finishing up is the &#8220;Alien Worm Rape Scene&#8221; which is perhaps the most controversial part of this movie. It&#8217;s basically exactly what it sounds like but I don&#8217;t see what makes it so taboo. I&#8217;ve definitely seen much worse on camera, in a sick twisted kind of way the scene is even humorous, has mankind just become more desensitized? As silly as all this is, it&#8217;s still probably one of the better films I saw for this list. It&#8217;s definitely (at least in my mind) one of the more forgettable Corman produced flicks but it still has a sliver of worth. This is the kind of movie you watch with all your friends at 2:00am, crack jokes, sit back, and have really dumb fun.</p>
<p>And here we have the memorable death of Sid Haig&#8217;s character, awesome?<br />
<iframe width="479" height="273" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/b7aIeeJQNvo?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3400</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 15</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3393</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3393#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 20:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I Spit on Your Grave (1978) A film that Roger Ebert once memorably called &#8220;A vile bag of garbage&#8221; there&#8217;s nothing funny about the sadistic exploitative pile that is I Spit on Your Grave. Showing rape is always a controversial move in any kind of film but I think it can be justified if done [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">I Spit on Your Grave (1978)</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3395" rel="attachment wp-att-3395"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/ISpitOnYourGraveposter-196x300.jpg" alt="" title="ISpitOnYourGraveposter" width="199" height="300" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-3395" /></a>A film that Roger Ebert once memorably called &#8220;A vile bag of garbage&#8221; there&#8217;s nothing funny about the sadistic exploitative pile that is <i>I Spit on Your Grave</I>. Showing rape is always a controversial move in any kind of film but I think it can be justified if done with artistic integrity, this on the other hand is just sick. I think you can tell I&#8217;m offended considering that I&#8217;m acting Sto (intentional typo) serious right now. This film has divided horror fans for years but to anyone who actually likes this film all I can say is &#8220;You are fucked up.&#8221; </p>
<p><i>I Spit on You Grave</i> is probably the most infamous of the nasty &#8220;revenge/rape&#8221; sub-genre that somehow materialized out of the late 70s, mostly because of this film. In this case it&#8217;s a young woman named Jennifer (Camille Keaton, the grand-niece of Buster Keaton) who travels out to a cabin in the woods to work on her novel but instead gets humiliated and raped by a gang of blue collar bozos. I don&#8217;t know what Director/Writer (yeah right) Meir Zarchi (who was later married to his rape star Keaton, eww) was trying to accomplish, but if this is supposed to be some artistic statement then it&#8217;s been long lost in a sea of senseless violence. This may as well be a porno with all the sex scenes but it&#8217;s even lower on the food chain considering how cruel and disgusting a film it is. Even when the main character gets her murderous revenge on the men it&#8217;s in such a demeaning way, engaging in sex with them again to get her grizzly vengeance. </p>
<p>I have trouble putting it into words so I recommend you just check this link to this old Roger Ebert review, he sums up this sadistic shlock just right.<br />
<a href="http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/19800716/REVIEWS/7160301/1023">Ebert&#8217;s Review</a></p>
<p>And you can believe this film has already been remade! See you next time for hopefully a more uplifting review. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3393</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 14</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3380</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3380#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 07:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Incredible Melting Man (1977) I&#8217;ve learned a many a useless fact from watching all these bad movies but one that never fails to amaze me is whenever I discover a new horror sub-genre. For instance, the film in question is apparently categorized under the quite appropriate sub-genre of &#8220;Melt Movies&#8221; which is exactly what [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">The Incredible Melting Man (1977)</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3382" rel="attachment wp-att-3382"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Melting-Man-189x300.jpg" alt="" title="Melting Man" width="199" height="300" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-3382" /></a>I&#8217;ve learned a many a useless fact from watching all these bad movies but one that never fails to amaze me is whenever I discover a new horror sub-genre. For instance, the film in question is apparently categorized under the quite appropriate sub-genre of &#8220;Melt Movies&#8221; which is exactly what it sounds like. Can you think of many movies where human bodies melt into a big goopy mess? Me neither, but apparently there&#8217;s enough to have a genre and along with the 1987 film <I>Street Trash</I> this is one of the more notable films of that slimy variety. </p>
<p>The film begins with Steve West (Alex Reber), an astronaut on a deep space mission who upon his return is severely affected by radiation and slowly begins to turn into a murderous mass of oozing flesh. Why does Steve start murdering people? That&#8217;s a good question and yet it&#8217;s never explained. Steve wakes up in the hospital to find himself horribly deformed and all melty but instead of handling the situation like any normal person would he decides he&#8217;s gonna go on a killing spree. The idea that audiences are supposed to accept this is absolutely insane. Doesn&#8217;t Steve wanna know if he can get better with ya know, skin grafts or something? Doesn&#8217;t he care about his own well being? Apparently not, because being ugly makes him mad and being mad makes Steve want to kill!</p>
<p>This whole &#8220;melting murdering man&#8221; thing also begs the question &#8220;How can someone who&#8217;s literally falling apart overpower anyone?&#8221; This guy just got out of the hospital and he&#8217;s strangling people, scaring kids, and terrorizing the elderly? Why and How? I DON&#8217;T KNOW it doesn&#8217;t make sense! And this spree of sorts is in the first seven minutes! But what&#8217;s almost the most infuriating is we really don&#8217;t know anything about Steve. We don&#8217;t know what he&#8217;s feeling, we don&#8217;t know his pain, we don&#8217;t know anything, so why should we care? </p>
<p>Even though <i>The Incredible Melting Man</I> is a logical nightmare there is one diamond in the rough in Rick Baker. Yes Rick Baker, the seven time Oscar winning makeup effects artist famous for such classics as <i> Star Wars</i> and <i>An American Werewolf in London</I> doing the makeup for the Steve &#8220;The Melting Man&#8221; West. It&#8217;s a phenomenal job too, so much so that I eventually found myself skipping through all the boring government/scientist people shit to all the scenes where we really get to see Steve sweatin&#8217; off his skin, M&#8217;FN killer! </p>
<p>Though as amazing as the effects are they can&#8217;t alone save this movie. When you get down to it <i>The Incredibly Melting Man</i> is a real bore with stale characters and a mess of a story, yes a real sticky, messy, failure pile that no one should ever have to deal with, EVER!</p>
<p>Skip ahead to about the 5:20 mark if you wanna see the Melting Man&#8217;s first scene, followed by the greatest reaction to a monster ever captured on film.<br />
<iframe width="479" height="355" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/VnspekQcJUM?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3380</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Retrospecticus: Resident Evil</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3303</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3303#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 23:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Retrospecticus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This doesn&#8217;t really have much to with anything, but it&#8217;s horror related so I&#8217;m calling it a very special Shocktober retrospective. I know there&#8217;s a lot spinoff games and Resident Evil on-rails shooters, but I&#8217;m going to try to stick to the main series. Hopefully I can recall most of my life and experiences correctly, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This doesn&#8217;t really have much to with anything, but it&#8217;s horror related so I&#8217;m calling it a very special Shocktober retrospective. I know there&#8217;s a lot spinoff games and Resident Evil on-rails shooters, but I&#8217;m going to try to stick to the main series. Hopefully I can recall most of my life and experiences correctly, so enjoy!</p>
<p>My progression from 16 bit games to 64 or whatever Playstation may of been was a slow progression. It wasn&#8217;t until 1998 when I even saw an actual playstation. One of my sister&#8217;s friends had let us borrow it for who knows what reason and left two games, <em>Final Fantasy VII</em> and <em>Resident Evil 2</em>. I had a blast playing <em>FFVII</em> but the other one I just couldn&#8217;t. Going from years of playing Sega Genesis to playing <em>RE2</em>? Not only was it a leap in virtually every aspect of gaming I could think of, but it was also the most terrifying game I&#8217;d ever seen. A few years later my family actually bought a Playstation, so I got to revisit <em>RE2</em> but could never play it for more than about fifteen minutes. The game was such an attack on the senses with it&#8217;s grisly images and atmospheric soundtrack, those games didn&#8217;t lie when that opening text would come up, &#8220;This game contains scenes of explicit violence and gore.&#8221; Yes those are the things that nightmares are made of and I&#8217;ve been a fan ever since.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Resident Evil (1996)</span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/5.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3305" rel="attachment wp-att-3305"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/RE1-150x150.jpg" alt="" title="RE1" width="150" height="150" class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-3305" /></a>I suppose I did play the second game first but as I previously stated I never could build up the nerves to get very far in my younger years. So I may of got this game later but probably beat it before <I>RE2</I>. So this is where it all started, but instead of simply telling you what it&#8217;s all about how about I show you with this &#8220;awesome&#8221; uncut video that opened the original game?</p>
<p><iframe width="479" height="355" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/_GyOYaDHquE?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>I swear that video just gets more and more awesome as time goes by. So once the STARS team enters the mansion you take control of either Jill or Chris investigating a mystery that continually gets more and more ridiculous. If you choose Jill you&#8217;ll get a gun, ammo and occasional help from Barry Burton who kind of looks like Cliff from <em>Cheers</em>, but if you play as Chris all you&#8217;ll start with is a knife because men are tough! Throughout the game you encounter both injured and brutally murdered members of the previous stars team, solve puzzles, and fight everything from zombies to giant sharks, spiders, mutants, and of course dogs. It&#8217;s chilling, it&#8217;s atmospheric, and a pitch perfect start to one of the gaming industries most enduring horror franchises.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Resident Evil 2 (1998)</span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/5.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3320" rel="attachment wp-att-3320"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/RE2-150x150.jpg" alt="" title="RE2" width="150" height="150" class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-3320" /></a>Here we go, this is the shit. I have so many memories of trying to build up the courage to play through this and then eventually beating the shit out of it (by which I mean completing the game.) This game basically does what any good sequel does, it improves on previous downfalls and kicks up the excitement, suspense, and overall gameplay. The game is no longer set in a creepy mansion but the dark underbelly of Raccoon City. This time around you control Leon S. Kennedy (clearly modeled after the then very popular Leonardo DiCaprio) and Claire Redfield, looking for her brother Chris (from the first game) for some reason.</p>
<p>Most of the game is set inside the Raccoon City Police department where you then head into the sewers to some underground research facility, trying to escape from all the darn zombie madness. The main antagonist of the game is William Birkin a scientist for the Umbrella company (the guys that created the zombie virus) who has now created the G-virus which he has injected into himself in an attempt to protect his life&#8217;s work from special agents. This means Birkin is the majority of your boss battles as you fight him in all of his grotesque and increasingly complex stages throughout the game.</p>
<p>This may be one of the only games where I almost enjoy the cutscenes more than the actual game. Sure it&#8217;s cheesy as hell but the gore is great and the scares are inventive and effective. This may not be the best in the franchise in terms of fluid gameplay but many <em>RE</em> fans consider it the best just for it&#8217;s atmosphere. This is easily one of the best playstation games ever made and of course one of the best zombie games.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Resident Evil 3: Nemesis (1999)</span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3327" rel="attachment wp-att-3327"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/RE3-150x150.jpg" alt="" title="RE3" width="150" height="150" class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-3327" /></a>Just when I thought the series couldn&#8217;t get any creepier Capcom hit back hard with <em>Resident Evil 3: Nemesis</em>. For the most part it&#8217;s fairly similar to <em>RE2</em> with one big, nasty, exception and his name is Nemesis. Who is Nemesis? In my opinion he&#8217;s the most terrifying boss in any game ever. What makes him so scary? Well not only is he huge, hideous, and practically invincible but you&#8217;re practically running from him for the entire game. He can easily kill you in one hit at almost any given time and yet he also gets a rocket launcher, why not?</p>
<p>The game takes place simultaneously during the events of <em>RE2</em> but this time you play as fan favorite Jill Valentine. Where the second games takes place under Raccoon City this one pits you right in the shit and I gotta tell ya, there&#8217;s nothing more satisfying then killing zombies in the big city. So why is <em>RE2</em> better? Because as much I like the idea of Nemesis you just can&#8217;t play this game comfortably. There&#8217;s something a little disappointing about constantly running from such a difficult enemy and it kind of gives the game a disjointed rhythm.</p>
<p>Another new feature of <em>RE3</em> is &#8220;Live Selection Mode&#8221; where the player must select between two possible actions that flash on the screen. Whatever you choose will affect what happens in the game and how it will all end, and of course it usually appears in high pressure moments, I like this feature. So it&#8217;s a little harder and Nemesis may annoy me a little but it&#8217;s still a great zombie game and a must play for survival horror fans.</p>
<p>Just to give you an idea of what Nemesis is like here&#8217;s a clip of a guy playing and actually beating Nemesis in his first encounter. Whatever, that&#8217;s not how you really play the game, it&#8217;s all about the chase!</p>
<p><iframe width="479" height="355" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/B2T8RRNWY4Y?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Resident Evil Code: Veronica (2000)</span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3356" rel="attachment wp-att-3356"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/RECV-150x150.jpg" alt="" title="RECV" width="150" height="150" class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-3356" /></a>Ah, one of the first games I owned for the Dreamcast, so many memories. The graphics were stylin&#8217;, the gameplay a little smoother, and the scares as good as ever. Though with the exception of 3D backgrounds apposed to pre-rendered ones this was essentially the same game we&#8217;d seen in the last two installments. I feel like it had more weapons (including dual wield pistols) but really it was just typical <em>Resident Evil</em>. For whatever reason I&#8217;ve never beat this one, probably do to the amount of new and stronger enemies (not mention it&#8217;s hella long) but I&#8217;ve gotten a lot farther in recent years so it&#8217;s only a matter of time.</p>
<p>In <em>REC:V</em> you take control of Claire Redfield (from <em>RE2</em>) who is looking for her brother Chris AGAIN (Why is he always missing?) and is arrested in her search at an Umbrella research facility. So she&#8217;s taken to and imprisoned on Rockfort Island a contaminated island controlled by an arrogant commander named Alfred Ashford. I&#8217;d go on but I feel like since I&#8217;ve never gotten far enough to know what it&#8217;s all about then what&#8217;s the point?</p>
<p>So I can take the difficulty, I mean the last one was kind of hard but I do have one big beef with <em>Code: Veronica</em> it ruined the story! Not that the story to <em>Resident Evil</em> was ever that good but the cutscenes to this game are just over the top. The characters are more cartoonish then ever and the fact that they brought back the seemingly normal Wesker (a S.T.A.R.S member who double crossed you in the first game) and made him some kind of inhuman karate master? What the hell is going on here? This is basically the game that marked the series&#8217; departure from just cops killing zombies to stupid conspiracies and ridiculous characters obsessed with world domination. But hey, even with all that it&#8217;s enjoyable and really showed off the capabilities of the Dreamcast.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Resident Evil (2002)</span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3347" rel="attachment wp-att-3347"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Resident_Evil_11-211x300.jpg" alt="" title="Resident_Evil_1" width="151" height="270" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-3347" /></a>It had only been about six years since the firs game when Capcom decided to join the remake bandwagon in a move that no one really cared about. I don&#8217;t mind when games get remade so whatever, of course I&#8217;d give it a whirl and there are some nice features in the remake but also some annoying new details. So the story is the same, characters, enemies the same (mostly), blah, blah, probably the first big difference is the look of the game. These graphics blow my mind even to this day, I even remember thinking back then that graphics couldn&#8217;t possibly ever get better than this. It had a very creepy photorealistic feel to it and is probably still one of the best looking games that was ever made for the Gamecube.</p>
<p>I also enjoy that the remake toned down some of the cheese factor in the cutscenes, it&#8217;s just too bad that corniness would return in later games. So it&#8217;s basically the look of the newer <em>RE</em> games with most of the feel of the old ones. One problem I have it that the zombies in this game are too hard too kill! Think about the recent <em>RE</em> games and how you just mow down enemies and then imagine if each and every zombie in itself was a big struggle. All the zombies in this game not only take way too many shots to take down but then you have to find gas and fire to burn the body so that they won&#8217;t come back as a super zombies. Sometimes I&#8217;d just try and avoid the zombies altogether seeing as how little ammo you get. I suppose in a way this is the epitome of survival horror, but it was a little too hard for my comfort zone back then and I haven&#8217;t played it since.<br />
My brother tells me that you get used to it after awhile and that in the end it&#8217;s a respectable re-imagining. I suppose it needed to be different in some ways I just wish they weren&#8217;t aspects that drew attention to the fact that I suck.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Resident Evil Zero (2002)</span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3361" rel="attachment wp-att-3361"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/RE0-211x300.jpg" alt="" title="RE0" width="151" height="270" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-3361" /></a>Though released in the same year as the <em>RE</em> remake <em>RE0</em> is completely different game. It wasn&#8217;t just a quick cash out game either, it was in development for a longtime. Why I remember reading about in 2000 when it was being developed for the N64, there were screenshots and everything. Though you know how complicated things can get in the gaming world so it was saved for the Gamecube which was a smart move. Go and look up some pictures of this game for the N64 and then some compare it to the Gamecube and I think you&#8217;ll find there&#8217;s really no contest. <I>REO</I> looked amazing on Gamecube and in addition it was a lot of fun.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t already know or haven&#8217;t already guessed, <em>RE0</em> is a prequel to the first game. Remember how in the first game your team was only sent in to the zombie mansion because the first team disappeared? Now you get to play as Rebecca Chambers, one of the members of the first team. You encounter Rebecca a handful of times in <em>RE1</em> but this game is set a few hours before until it eventually intertwines. Along with Rebecca you&#8217;re partnered with Billy a hot tempered escaped convict that you get to switch off with. This leads to one of the new features of <em>RE0</em> &#8220;Partner Zapping&#8221; where you can switch off between the two characters even if they are not together, it&#8217;s a unique feature but naturally I longed for it to just be two player. So that has it&#8217;s ups and downs but what really annoys me is the fact that they got rid of item boxes in this game. I guess they figured two characters worth of inventory space was enough but constantly I find myself dropping things only to go back and pick them up later.</p>
<p>Eventually this partner zapping stuff just got to me and I couldn&#8217;t keep playing it. It was just too annoying to go back and forth, back and forth and I never finished the game. It&#8217;s definitely more accessible than the remake but it&#8217;s still a little too unusual to be considered anything more than just average.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Resident Evil 4 (2005)</span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/5.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3366" rel="attachment wp-att-3366"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/RE4-216x300.jpg" alt="" title="RE4" width="151" height="270" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-3366" /></a>Though the series continued to keep fans mildly content with a new game every few years the franchise hadn&#8217;t been doing much to attract any new fans and was even in danger of growing stale with it&#8217;s predictable gameplay. So <em>RE4</em> was the game that wasn&#8217;t just a breath of fresh air for <em>RE</em> fans but for all fans of horror themed games. It had good controls, great graphics, solid gameplay, and great scares with the series new threat &#8220;Las Plagas&#8221;.</p>
<p>Leon from <em>RE2</em> returns as a special agent for the U.S. government on a mission to rescue the president&#8217;s daughter. Leon&#8217;s search eventually leads him a European village that appears to be somewhere in Spain and is infected with a some kind of virus called &#8220;Plagas&#8221;. This makes the enemies faster, smarter, and sometimes when you shoot them in the head big squiggly wigglies pop out. It turns out this all some scheme concocted by Osmund Saddler leader of the cult Los Illuminados. I guess they&#8217;re going to infect the president&#8217;s daughter and like send her back and infect people? Actually it&#8217;s probably one of the more basic <em>RE</em> storylines, but that doesn&#8217;t stop it from being cheesy. I&#8217;ve learned to deal with the fact that this series has now moved on from zombies and gotten pretty silly with ridiculous characters and plot-lines, this is probably because the gameplay is just so good it&#8217;s like who cares?</p>
<p><em>RE4</em> only vaguely resembles the same kind of gameplay featured in the original games opting for more action but it still has the same eerie atmosphere and for that it&#8217;s may be the most entertaining game in the franchise yet.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Resident Evil 5 (2009)</span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.5.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3367" rel="attachment wp-att-3367"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/RE5-210x300.jpg" alt="" title="RE5" width="151" height="270" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-3367" /></a>I&#8217;ve been kind of in and out of video games these days, though a sure fire way to draw me in will always be nostalgia. This game had that nostalgic effect on me in two ways; 1. It seemed like it had been an eternity since I&#8217;d played a new <em>RE</em> and 2. It had been awhile since I&#8217;d played a good multiplayer game. Growing up with a younger brother I very rarely played one player games &#8220;back in the day&#8221;, we were always looking for solid two player games cause ya know, sharing is caring. So it was a rare treat for me and Paul to join forces once again and play through a whole game together, a Resident Evil game at that. In an age where online gameplay reigns supreme it&#8217;s a nice change of pace to actually play with someone who is in the same room as you.</p>
<p>I reviewed this awhile back on the blog so I&#8217;ll be brief. So you play as Chris Redfield and his partner Sheva Alomar and they gotta go to Africa cause everyone is infected with a virus yadda, yadda Wesker shows up and is stupider than ever with his plot to destroy mankind and show off his <em>Matrix</em> powers. Aside from that this game has some exhilarating two player gameplay (the only way to play it as far as I&#8217;m concerned), slick graphics, good blah, blah, it&#8217;s awesome!</p>
<p>Seeing as I&#8217;m crapping out at the end here as I usually do on long posts, let me just say this has been one of my favorite game franchises and even though I am a very casual gamer these days I&#8217;ll probably always keep on eye on this scary little series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3303</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 13</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3275</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3275#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 07:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Death Bed The Bed That Eats (1977) Thirty-four years ago there was a man with a dream. A man who just wanted to tell a story about a bed, a bed that eats people. Tragically director George Barry simply flew too close to the sun for the film Death Bed the Bed That Eats was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Death Bed The Bed That Eats (1977)</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3278" rel="attachment wp-att-3278"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/deathbed1-210x300.jpg" alt="" title="deathbed" width="199" height="300" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-3278" /></a>Thirty-four years ago there was a man with a dream. A man who just wanted to tell a story about a bed, a bed that eats people. Tragically director George Barry simply flew too close to the sun for the film <i>Death Bed the Bed That Eats</I> was lost for many years. Eventually the film was rediscovered in the early 2000s and released on dvd in 2003. Since then it has achieved cult status thanks to word of mouth from fans and from a classic bit by comedian Patton Oswalt, this is some serious shit.</p>
<p>What can one really imagine after hearing a title like &#8220;Death Bed&#8221;? First of all you&#8217;ll probably think, &#8220;There&#8217;s no way in hell that&#8217;s actually a movie.&#8221; Once this barrier has been broken down you&#8217;d probably assume it&#8217;s just a really bad monster/slasher kind of movie, but then you&#8217;d only be half right. <i>Death Bed</i> is no more a movie than an avant garde experiment. It&#8217;s kind of like the ultimate bad student art film in that it tries to be deep with perhaps the worst premise ever conceived by man. <i>Death Bed</i> is closer to being a documentary than your typical b-horror movie which lets it inhabit this bizarre mid-ground between two genres. </p>
<p>The film details the narrated history of the death bed through the use of out of sequence events from different points in time. We see it kill people in the past and present while learning of it&#8217;s unspeakable evil from a man trapped behind a painting in the same room as the bed? Yes this man or ghost or whatever tells the story of the death bed and all it&#8217;s victims (including himself) in some sort of extra dimensional limbo but can also communicate to individuals when the bed sleeps… Yeah that&#8217;s right when the bed sleeps. What we learn from this man is that the death bed was once a demon, but wait the demon was also once a tree. So the tree demon became a wind demon and then fell in love with a woman he blew past. The demon then became a human demon and made a bed. The demon-man made love to the woman on the bed but she died which then made the demon-man&#8217;s eyes bleed onto the bed and it became possessed, did you get all that?</p>
<p>So being that a bed is an immobile antagonist all the scenes must depict events that have taken place near, around, or in the bed. I assume the heavy narration is due to the low budget as most of the actual dialogue is clearly dubbed but they needed something to make the film at least semi-comprehensible. So the only entertainment value in this film comes from the death bed&#8217;s kills. How does one get killed by a death bed? Well you see the death bed secretes a kind of stomach acid that sucks people down inside and then digests them. This has some great comic value as various people die and are injured in an overly comedic fashion, including a man who has his hand&#8217;s turned into skeleton hands. </p>
<p>This is another film that could of been a great comedy but instead took itself far too serious. If you want to see a good &#8220;bed death&#8221;, you should probably check out <i>Nightmare on Elm Street</I> because this one will really put you to sleep. </p>
<p>Skip ahead to about the 3:50 mark to see one of the death bed&#8217;s finest moments.<br />
<iframe width="479" height="355" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/-zrolg5uHag?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3275</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>T3: Really Short Songs</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3232</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3232#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 07:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Ten]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just something I was thinking about. I&#8217;ll be brief, because these songs sure are&#8230; Less than 90 seconds to be exact. 10. The Pixies &#8211; &#8220;Crackity Jones&#8221; You&#8217;ve got to admit, this song moves. 9. The Stone Roses &#8211; Elizabeth My Dear This is what it would be like if the Stone Roses were more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/8935030.7a14a49e.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><p>Just something I was thinking about. I&#8217;ll be brief, because these songs sure are&#8230; Less than 90 seconds to be exact.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">10. The Pixies &#8211; &#8220;Crackity Jones&#8221;</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><iframe width="479" height="25" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/aPr7AzH36-M" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe><br />
You&#8217;ve got to admit, this song moves.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">9. The Stone Roses &#8211; Elizabeth My Dear</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><iframe width="479" height="25" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/VJNcnDLWNis?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe><br />
This is what it would be like if the Stone Roses were more like Simon and Garfunkel. I wanted to include a Bob Dylan song, but I couldn&#8217;t find a YouTube of the one I was looking for, so&#8230; substitution.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">8. Foo Fighters &#8211; &#8220;Doll&#8221;</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><iframe width="479" height="25" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/EYBQZmyVKDM?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe><br />
An auspicious start to what is probably their best album.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">7. Red Hot Chili Peppers &#8211; &#8220;They&#8217;re Red Hot&#8221;</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><iframe width="479" height="25" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/lqigzxs9eSM?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe><br />
What a way to end an album. Demon heads!</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">6. The White Stripes &#8211; &#8220;Little Room&#8221;</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><iframe width="479" height="25" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/4OqveSybH0A?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe><br />
This is the first time in my life I wished &#8220;Fell in Love with a Girl&#8221; was shorter.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">5. The Who &#8211; &#8220;It&#8217;s a Boy&#8221;</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><iframe width="479" height="25" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/Yza3Z1zkrdQ?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe><br />
Sorry about posting <em>Tommy</em> spoilers. It&#8217;s not even Whovember yet.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">4. Coldplay &#8211; &#8220;Parachutes&#8221;</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><iframe width="479" height="25" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/ZYZYqkAM9uI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe><br />
Hurr durr herp derp Coldplay.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">3. Scott Walker &#8211; &#8220;30 Century Man&#8221;</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><iframe width="479" height="25" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/wMKnov_ll0M" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe><br />
This song is featured in both <em>The Life Aquatic</em> and one of the <em>Futurama</em> movies.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">2. The Beatles &#8211; &#8220;Her Majesty&#8221;</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><iframe width="479" height="25" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/J070ZJIBX-o" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe><br />
The original hidden track? I very much doubt it. But it&#8217;s fun to wildly speculate.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">1. Cat Stevens &#8211; &#8220;Tea for the Tillerman&#8221;</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><iframe width="479" height="25" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/ghoS6iJTrYc" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe><br />
In conclusion, 90 seconds was a pretty arbitrary limit that stopped me from listing many great songs that are shorter than two minutes. I guess the lesson here is you don&#8217;t have to spend a lot of time to make something great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3232</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 12</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3252</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3252#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 17:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Night of the Lepus (1972) Ever since Hitchcock&#8217;s The Birds there&#8217;s been no shortage of killer animal movies just about every year. This fascination with creepy critters seemed to culminate in the 70s when these films were a dime a dozen. You had films like; Frogs, Kingdom of the Spiders, Grizzly, Squirm, Day of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Night of the Lepus (1972)</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3254" rel="attachment wp-att-3254"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-3254" title="night-of-the-lepus-movie-poster-1972-1020464270" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/night-of-the-lepus-movie-poster-1972-1020464270-196x300.jpg" alt="" width="199" height="300" /></a>Ever since Hitchcock&#8217;s <em>The Birds</em> there&#8217;s been no shortage of killer animal movies just about every year. This fascination with creepy critters seemed to culminate in the 70s when these films were a dime a dozen. You had films like; <em>Frogs</em>, <em>Kingdom of the Spiders</em>, <em>Grizzly</em>, <em>Squirm</em>, <em>Day of the Animals</em>, <em>Empire of the Ants</em>, <em>Dracula&#8217;s Dog</em> that came out like clockwork, but <em>Night of the Lepus</em>, there was something special about that one. Sure most of these films were stupid, but at least the animals featured in most of them had some potential to be deadly. Ants, spiders, bears, hell even some frogs can secrete toxins, but rabbits? Cute, cuddly, innocent, little rabbits? The fact that anyone thought an audience would be afraid of rabbits boggles the mind but really you can&#8217;t believe it till you see it.</p>
<p>So the setup is that thousands of rabbits have invaded a southwestern town after all their natural predators (coyotes) were somehow eliminated. So this rancher (Rory Calhoun) wants a very seventies looking Deforest &#8220;Bones&#8221; Kelley playing a college president to find a way to thin the rabbit population along with two other researchers (Stuart Whitman and Janet Leigh.) So they experiment with a test rabbit, a little girl falls in love with it, the rabbit escapes and the next thing you know there&#8217;s giant killer rabbits I guess. What&#8217;s a surprise about all this is the first half of the film actually seems pretty competent. This film follows a ridiculous premise yes, but the acting is good and the campiness is kept to a minimum. Then you have the reveal of the giant rabbits and all hope is lost.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the fact that this film takes itself so seriously that hampers it the most. This solemn tone works okay in the first half but by the time the giant rabbits show up it&#8217;s embarrassing. Maybe it could have passed it the rabbits were even remotely scary but they&#8217;re just regular rabbits that only look big due to some not so impressive camera techniques. The rabbits rarely seem to interact with the other actors on screen, rather we only see them constantly running towards the camera in slow motion. So from their reveal to their fateful demise (they eventually get electrocuted on some train tracks) this is a total suck fest, oh yes and of course it ends on an ambiguous note. &#8220;Some of them survived?&#8221; ugh, that&#8217;s all folks.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a rabbit attack clip, it&#8217;s a little fuzzy but it&#8217;s there in all it&#8217;s glory.<br />
<iframe width="479" height="273" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/9s9nKzmbndA?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3252</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hard to Resist</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3086</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3086#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 14:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3086</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Resistance 3 Did you ever wonder what it would be like if they turned the movie version of The Road into a video game? It might be a little like Resistance 3. Except with way more aliens. Taking place some time after Resistance 2 (it&#8217;s hard to tell how much, since I never played the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><em>Resistance 3</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3087" rel="attachment wp-att-3087"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-3087" title="R3_Boxart" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/R3_Boxart.jpeg" alt="" width="250" height="290" /></a>Did you ever wonder what it would be like if they turned the movie version of <em>The Road </em>into a video game? It might be a little like <em>Resistance 3</em>. Except with way more aliens. Taking place some time after <em>Resistance 2 </em>(it&#8217;s hard to tell how much, since I never played the first two games) the world of this game is pretty bleak. Before WWII could start, a strange infection spread from a meteor, infecting people and turning them into alien monsters called chimera. So, when the aliens invaded with their futuristic technology, they simply could not be beaten. There&#8217;s numbers kept growing while humanity died off. Now the aliens are freezing the planet so that more of them can move in via wormhole. The few people that are left have a cure for the chimera virus, but there are so few of them. And the world is dying.</p>
<p>Pretty bleak, eh? Sure, it&#8217;s not <em>The Road</em> but that&#8217;s pretty dour for a video game, if you ask me. Maybe more like <em>The Walking Dead </em>or <em>The Mist</em>. And it gets worse. You play as Joseph Capelli, the guy who apparently mercy killed the hero from the first two games. As a result, he was dishonorably discharged and is hated the world over. He carved out a little life in a small town with his wife and child, but even that is taken away when a scientist comes to town, with the chimera in hot pursuit. Joseph&#8217;s family is forced to flee and Joseph has to leave them to accompany the scientist to New York, a certainly futile pursuit at stopping the chimera invasion. Along the way they&#8217;ll have to avoid massive chimera and bands of humans, because, as we all know about apocalyptic futures, the real enemy is always man.</p>
<p>A lot of <em>Resistance 3 </em>feels like it was designed in 2005. Joseph is very talkative in cinematics, clearly an opinionated dude. But during gameplay, he&#8217;s totally silent. Which is weird because people are always talking to him. They even ask questions, and Joseph doesn&#8217;t say a word. This problem is compounded in coop, when Joseph has a constant companion named John who no one ever acknowledges. What did John do that the whole world would give him the cold shoulder? Look Insomniac, you have a good story with quality characters. Don&#8217;t turn them off during gameplay! That&#8217;s supposed to be the best part!</p>
<p>Combat is a bit of a throwback too. The game uses health packs instead of regenerating health, which frankly felt weird for the first few minutes of combat, then stopped being a concern. Unlike most modern games, the guns are also perfectly fine when fired from the hip, which, once again, I&#8217;m fine with. It really helps that the game has a great variety of weapons and encourages you to use all of them. You get a bunch of guns, all of which you can hold at the same time, which level up by usage. So, for example, if you use that shotgun enough, its bullets turn into incendiary rounds. This gets really crazy with the alien guns, weapons that suck enemies into black holes and or cause them to puff up and explode. Insomniac has always had a knack for designing great weapons, and that&#8217;s probably the best part of this game.</p>
<p><em>Resistance 3</em>&#8216;s multiplayer suite is a step down from what <em>Resistance 2 </em>offered. Gone are the RPG-inspired 8 player coop missions that were, as far as I could tell, the best part of the last game. Instead there&#8217;s a very standard collection of modes that I&#8217;m sure you can already guess. The game also supports Move and 3D, which you probably guessed, since it was the game they used to market the PlayStation TV.</p>
<p><em>Resistance 3 </em>looks great and has a story that&#8217;s pretty compelling, by first person shooter standards or otherwise. The impressive gun variety and pseudo-throwback gameplay really help it to stand out in a world of infinite <em>Call of Duty </em>clones. You have to admit, in a year where it seems that every single game has &#8220;3&#8243; in the title, it&#8217;s nice that this game is fairly self-contained as well. I might not have played the first two games in the series, but that didn&#8217;t stop me from having a great time with <em>Resistance 3</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3086</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Never Tell Me the Odds</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2976</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2976#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 14:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[50/50 While we all wait with bated breath for Nancy&#8217;s Moneyball review, I figured I might as well right something about the other movie everybody&#8217;s probably already seen by now. In 50/50, Adam, the proxy for screenwriter Will Reiser, finds out he has cancer in his back. He&#8217;s only 27 years old and seemingly quite healthy, so [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><em>50/50</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=2977" rel="attachment wp-att-2977"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-2977" title="50_50_Poster" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/50_50_Poster-202x300.jpg" alt="" width="202" height="300" /></a>While we all wait with bated breath for Nancy&#8217;s <em>Moneyball </em>review, I figured I might as well right something about the other movie everybody&#8217;s probably already seen by now. In <em>50/50</em>, Adam, the proxy for screenwriter Will Reiser, finds out he has cancer in his back. He&#8217;s only 27 years old and seemingly quite healthy, so that&#8217;s a bit of a surprise. But so is this movie, which manages to find plenty of humor in what seems like entirely depressing material. Or perhaps the bigger surprise is that a movie that features Seth Rogen in a key supporting role can find a way to bring real tenderness and truth.</p>
<p>Adam&#8217;s a pretty sympathetic dude. He&#8217;s not getting any from his girlfriend, but he&#8217;s OK with that. He seems to be the one guy at the public radio station he works at that really takes the job seriously, spending hours working on a report on a volcano while Seth Rogen just busts out a story about the best burgers in Seattle. And then he&#8217;s got cancer on top of that. There&#8217;s not too much to this story, it simply follows Adam and the important people in his life as he deals with his disease. As we&#8217;ve all seen in <em>Breaking Bad </em>and other cancer stories, the disease affects more than just the person it inflicts. And so it is that we have to watch Adam&#8217;s girlfriend Rachael (Bryce Dallas Howard) struggle with the disease and his mom, Anjelica Huston, desperately try to become a bigger part of Adam&#8217;s life. Most significantly, Adam starts spending time with fresh-faced psychologist Katie (Anna Kendrick, playing the same part she seems to always play).</p>
<p>I referenced <em>Breaking Bad </em>because <em>50/50 </em>does a few things that seemed very reminiscent of that show. When Adam gets the prognosis, the scene plays out very similarly to that part of the <em>Breaking Bad </em>pilot. Not that there&#8217;s really anything wrong with that, I just really like <em>Breaking Bad </em>and I&#8217;ll take any opportunity I can to write about it.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s inescapable that <em>50/50 </em>is based on the real-life experiences of Will Reiser and Seth Rogen. I don&#8217;t know for certain what parts of this story are based on reality and what are invented, but I could guess. Seth Rogen, I&#8217;m guessing, is just playing himself, which is to say he is playing the same stoner slacker character he usually does. The movie has some scenes that were pretty raw. Some of them were done for the comedy, and they delivered hearty laughs that this year has been missing. Others are more emotional, and they&#8217;re surprisingly affecting. Particularly, a scene in the hospital had me choked up. Joseph Gordon-Levitt is really good here, perhaps good enough to warrant awards attention, if you care about that sort of thing.</p>
<p>But its probably the comedy that I&#8217;ll remember about <em>50/50</em>. The scene trying to use cancer as a pick-up line. A great turn by Philip Baker Hall. That greyhound named Skeletor. There&#8217;s a lot to love. This is a pretty special movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2976</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Damned Good</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3080</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3080#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3080</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shadows of the Damned Shadows of the Damned is an embarrassing game. It is a collaboration of two of the greatest game developers Japan has to offer, Suda51 (No More Heroes) and Shinji Mikami (Resident Evil). Despite that, or perhaps as a result of that, a significant proportion of Shadows of the Damned is dick [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><em>Shadows of the Damned</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3081" rel="attachment wp-att-3081"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-3081" title="ShadowsOfTheDamned" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/ShadowsOfTheDamned-227x300.jpg" alt="" width="227" height="300" /></a><em>Shadows of the Damned</em> is an embarrassing game. It is a collaboration of two of the greatest game developers Japan has to offer, Suda51 (<em>No More Heroes</em>) and Shinji Mikami (<em>Resident Evil</em>). Despite that, or perhaps as a result of that, a significant proportion of <em>Shadows of the Damned</em> is dick jokes. Not really clever ones either. Stuff like your bone-shooting gun being called &#8220;the Boner.&#8221; That weapon gets upgraded twice. Its upgraded names? The Hot Boner and the Big Boner. Yeah, <em>Shadows of the Damned </em>isn&#8217;t exactly a title that makes you proud of how far gaming has come. But, if you&#8217;re willing to laugh at that kind of stupidity, you&#8217;ll find <em>Shadows of the Damned </em>a pretty entertaining ride.</p>
<p>The awesomely-named douchebag demon hunter Garcia Hotspur comes home one day to find his girlfriend Paula murdered/kidnapped by the creepy Lord of Demons, Flemming. Garcia follows Flemming into the underworld, hoping to save Paula. Along with him is his floating skull companion, Johnson (hur hur), who can transform into a torch, guns and even a motorcycle. It&#8217;s a weird game. Some aspects of the underworld are actually pretty disturbing, like the twisted backstories of each boss, which you get to read from giant storybooks. The game is helped out a lot by its strong voice cast, Garcia and Johnson actually do have some rapport. There not really likable, but that&#8217;s kind of beside the point. It&#8217;s not quite grindhouse, but it has those kinds of sensibilities.</p>
<p>Mechanically, <em>Shadows of the Damned </em>is akin to a quicker <em>Resident Evil 4</em>. Shooting feels pretty much the same, with the familiar over-the-shoulder lazer sight aiming in full effect. Johnson can turn into three guns, modeled after a pistol, a shotgun and a machine gun. They are each upgraded several times over the course of the story and can be further upgraded using in-game currency. The controls feel tight and faster than even <em>Resident Evil 5</em>. Add in some solid enemy variety and a few interesting boss fights and you got yourself some solid gameplay.</p>
<p><em>Shadows of the Damend</em> really comes down to whether you like the way it&#8217;s written or not. If you can get into its world, characters and dialogue, it could rank among your favorite games of the year. For me, I found the overly-indulgent stupidity distracting. In one turret sequence, Garcia kept yelling &#8220;Taste my Big Boner.&#8221; You see, the Johnson had turned into the Big Boner, a massive gun, and Garcia was holding it at hip level, shooting demons. I get it, neither of the guys developing this had a track record of great storytelling, but come on. You can&#8217;t make the same dick jokes over and over for a whole game and expect me to laugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3080</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>C.A.T: Love it to Death</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3195</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3195#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 17:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alice Cooper &#8211; Love it to Death (1971) Okay here it is, I swear this is my final post about Alice Cooper. After this I don&#8217;t know why I&#8217;d ever need to write about him again. Frankly I don&#8217;t even want to write this post right now but I&#8217;ve always thought &#8220;Hey it would be fun [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Alice Cooper &#8211; <em>Love it to Death</em> (1971)</span></td>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3197" rel="attachment wp-att-3197"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Aclove-150x150.jpg" alt="" title="Aclove" width="150" height="150" class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-3197" /></a>Okay here it is, I swear this is my final post about Alice Cooper. After this I don&#8217;t know why I&#8217;d ever need to write about him again. Frankly I don&#8217;t even want to write this post right now but I&#8217;ve always thought &#8220;Hey it would be fun to review this album around halloween huh?&#8221; I mean it is his best so it&#8217;s as good as way as any to end my string of posts on the King of Shock Rock. <em>Billion Dollar Babies</em> may have been the groups biggest commercial success but this is the album with the best tunes and the best feel for frightening subject matter.</p>
<p>After two failed albums this is the release that brought the group into the mainstream. A great deal of this is attributed to both the improved songwriting from the band (most notably guitarist/keyboardist Michael Bruce) and producer Bob Ezrin (<em>Kiss</em>, <em>Pink Floyd</em>) who would from here on become an integral part of the band&#8217;s sound. The Alice Cooper fan favorite &#8220;I&#8217;m Eighteen&#8221; was the breakout single of the album but alongside it were many tracks that were of equal quality. Songs like &#8220;Long Way to Go&#8221; and &#8220;Is It My Body?&#8221; are quick, no nonsense rockers that pack a punch both melodically and instrumentally while songs like &#8220;Black Juju&#8221; and &#8220;Ballad of Dwight Frye&#8221; (obvious nod to the horror actor) reveal more of the group&#8217;s dark experimental side. <em>Love it to Death</em> also holds a special place in my heart for containing my favorite <em>Alice Cooper</em> song &#8220;Caught in a Dream&#8221; a catchy Bruce penned rocker that opens the album and has made it onto many of my rock playlists, it&#8217;s like the classic that never was. </em></em></p>
<p>I hear <em>Poon</em> guitarist/vocalist Lesley Quartermaine was greatly inspired by this album while recording his last E.P. I caught up with him for a quick comment. Lesley said: &#8220;Man when that album came out everyone was all like freakin&#8217; out &#8217;cause they thought Alice was sticking his schlong out on the cover… I don&#8217;t remember anything else about that album.&#8221; In addition it was included on <em>Rolling Stone Magazine&#8217;s</em> 500 Greatest Albums list awhile back so if you&#8217;re looking for something good to listen to this halloween season then you got to check it out it&#8217;s freaky fun.</p>
<p><strong>Favorite Tracks:</strong> &#8220;Caught in a Dream&#8221;, &#8220;Hallowed Be My Name&#8221;, &#8220;Is It My Body?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3195</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 11</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3188</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3188#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 16:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Manos: The Hands of Fate (1966) The story behind this horrendous horror flick starts in 1966 when theater actor/fertilizer salesman Harold P. Warren made a bet with future oscar winning screenwriter Stirling Silliphant that he could make a successful independent horror movie. So he assembled a crew and cast of people and with little to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Manos: The Hands of Fate (1966)</span></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3190" rel="attachment wp-att-3190"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Manos-183x300.jpg" alt="" title="Manos" width="199" height="300" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-3190" /></a>The story behind this horrendous horror flick starts in 1966 when theater actor/fertilizer salesman Harold P. Warren made a bet with future oscar winning screenwriter Stirling Silliphant that he could make a successful independent horror movie. So he assembled a crew and cast of people and with little to no film experience made what’s probably one of the worst films ever to be seen by man. I’ll admit that the first twenty minutes are pretty funny but after awhile I found myself slowly slipping into a state of severe depression as the film got more and more out of hand.</p>
<p>Two years ago on this blog I picked this film as my number one least favorite horror film of all time. Since then I&#8217;ve probably seen a few films worse but this is still one helluva suckfest. Out of all the film&#8217;s I watched for this series this is maybe the worse in regards to the film&#8217;s technical aspects. The image quality is scratchy at best and the additional audio recording all seems to be a beat off. Its just hilarious how the score seems to hit all the wrong cues, they couldn&#8217;t of messed up any harder if they tried. </p>
<p>Briefly recapping the plot <i>Manos: The Hands of Fate</I> is about a a family of three (Harold P. Warren is the father) that take a road trip through Texas but end up becoming the victims of a Polygamous Pagan cult. The first cult member we are introduced to is Torgo (John Reynolds) a satyr-like servant of &#8220;The Master&#8221; who takes care of a house in the middle of nowhere. Torgo is easily my favorite character as he gets the most laughs for his many moments of creepy awkwardness while around the family. To play Torgo actor John Reynolds wore prosthetics to create the illusion of satyr legs. Unfortunately he wore them backwards while filming and caused permanent damage to his knees which led to an addiction to painkillers until his tragic suicide a month before the film&#8217;s premiere, damn that&#8217;s sad. Back to the movie it more or less descends into nonsense once we are introduced to the &#8220;Master&#8221; and his crazy cult and the family &#8220;Spolier Alert&#8221; eventually joins the cult as we are eventually left with the words &#8220;The End?&#8221; Yeah I&#8217;m serious, they just made all the right moves didn&#8217;t they? If you&#8217;re gonna check this one just check out the first 15 minutes, the rest is more or less the equivalent of going to hell. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3188</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 10</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3175</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3175#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Monster a-Go Go (1965) Monster a-Go Go seems like one of those films where someone really wanted to make a quick buck by using the least amount of effort imaginable, including the overall lack of an idea. I&#8217;d imagine it was the monster craze of the 1960s that was responsible for even giving movies like [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Monster a-Go Go (1965)</span></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3177" rel="attachment wp-att-3177"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/monster_a_go_go_poster_01-197x300.jpg" alt="" title="monster_a_go_go_poster_01" width="199" height="300" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-3177" /></a><i>Monster a-Go Go</i> seems like one of those films where someone really wanted to make a quick buck by using the least amount of effort imaginable, including the overall lack of an idea. I&#8217;d imagine it was the monster craze of the 1960s that was responsible for even giving movies like this a chance. If you don&#8217;t know what I&#8217;m referring to I mean when things like <i>Famous Monsters of Filmland Magazine</I> and <i>Aurora Models</I> helped reignite interest in the monsters of the 1930s with the young baby boomer crowd. This resulted in monsters, monsters, everywhere! But with the strange exception that no one was making any GOOD monsters movies to capitalize on this renewed interest. Instead you had all these cheap ass, double feature drive-in disasters and this is one of them. </p>
<p>According to IMDb this movie is about &#8220;A space capsule crash-lands, and the astronaut aboard disappears. Is there a connection between the missing man and the monster roaming the area?&#8221; Hey, I&#8217;m still not sure. So the astronaut, Frank I believe his name was apparently transforms or is um, somehow replaced by an ugly thing that looks like Gene Siskel with a cup of acid thrown in his face. So the military tries to capture him, they eventually do capture him and then he escapes again. Oh yeah and were not shown any of this military involvement the narrator just tells us that&#8217;s what happened. Later we learn that the monster was just immitating Frank, but then were told it never even existed? What the hell is going on here!</p>
<p>Doing a little research (Wikipedia) I learned that the original filmmaker Bill Rebane ran out of money while making this film. So strangely enough Herschell Gordon Lewis (that gory horror director that Jason Bateman likes in <i>Juno</I>) finished the film so that he could have a second film to show with his own feature <i>Moonshine Mountain</I> in a double bill. To do this Lewis added extra scenes and some more dialogue that somehow only made the film worse and even more convoluted. This whole process took several years which is probably why half of the film&#8217;s cast disappears midway into the film.</p>
<p>In addition to a messy production, <i>Monster A Go-Go</I> has all the essential makings of a bad 60s horror movie; copious amounts of unnecessary narration, a terrible looking monster, and lots of pointless filler. How hard can it be to just make a good monster movie? Very hard in this case. I mean even in the worst monster movies there should be some camp value in looking at the goofy monster but you don&#8217;t even get that satisfaction. I can barely even remember seeing the monster more than once, the rest of the time you just hear the narrator describing what happened in a scene we never saw, I didn&#8217;t know you could make movies that way! His screen time is so ridiculously minimal it&#8217;s like they sat down and said, &#8220;Hey let&#8217;s make a monster movie without a monster.&#8221;But perhaps the greatest question of all… What the hell is a &#8220;Monster a Go-Go?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3175</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 9</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3155</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3155#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2011 18:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Incredibly Strange Creatures Who Stopped Living and Became Mixed-Up Zombies (1964) Some movies are good, some are bad, and some are Incredibly Strange Creatures Who Stopped Living and Became Mixed-Up Zombies, if you can even consider that a movie. I mean the title sums it up just perfectly, this is a film where no [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">The Incredibly Strange Creatures Who Stopped Living and Became Mixed-Up Zombies (1964)</span></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3157" rel="attachment wp-att-3157"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Mixed-Up-Zombies-213x300.jpg" alt="" title="Mixed Up Zombies" width="199" height="300" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-3157" /></a>Some movies are good, some are bad, and some are <i>Incredibly Strange Creatures Who Stopped Living and Became Mixed-Up Zombies</i>, if you can even consider that a movie. I mean the title sums it up just perfectly, this is a film where no one had any idea what they were doing. <i>I.S.C.W.S.L.B.M.U.Z</i> is a film that&#8217;s one part monster movie, one part musical, and all parts incredibly discomforting acid trip. This is a film where I imagine they took a few different &#8220;ideas&#8221; put them in a blender, drank them, vomited them up and then put them back in the blender. The confines of logic do not exist in this nightmarish experience and one can only be left with regret after seeing an abomination like this.</p>
<p>The premise is that of an evil gypsy that hypnotizes and turns people into zombies at some kind of carnival… I think. Interspersed with all of this are long sequences of painfully boring song-and-dance numbers that probably dominate more of the film&#8217;s running time then anything else. If the makers of this film set out to disturb and confuse moviegoers than they most definitely succeeded. Hmm, now I&#8217;m drawing a blank, suppose I did a good job of erasing this from mind already.</p>
<p>If you must witness this diarrhea nightmare I highly recommend you take the <i>Mystery Science Theater 3000</I> route it will make it at least mildly tolerable, but whether the running time of this film was 82 minutes or 10 minutes, it would still feel like an eternity. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d post a picture or video but they&#8217;re all of such poor quality, so why even bother?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3155</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 8</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3124</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3124#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 07:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Creeping Terror (1964) I&#8217;ve seen a lot of monsters but nothing quite matches the crappiness of this blob-like mess. Supposedly the makers of The Creeping Terror originally made a much better monster suit but it got stolen. So with little money to spend they assembled a creature so ridiculous that it&#8217;s now infamously known [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">The Creeping Terror (1964)</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3128" rel="attachment wp-att-3128"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-3128" title="creepingterror_cover" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/creepingterror_cover-210x300.jpg" alt="" width="199" height="300" /></a>I&#8217;ve seen a lot of monsters but nothing quite matches the crappiness of this blob-like mess. Supposedly the makers of <em>The Creeping Terror</em> originally made a much better monster suit but it got stolen. So with little money to spend they assembled a creature so ridiculous that it&#8217;s now infamously known as the &#8220;Pile of Carpets&#8221; because that&#8217;s basically what it is. So what do you do when you have a monster movie with a terrible looking monster? Show it? How about non-stop? Hell yeah!</p>
<p>The premise is simple, a newlywed couple encounters a spaceship, a monster emerges, and therefore they must stop it! Though what&#8217;s really strange about all of this is that watching this movie is like watching some kind of educational instructional video. This is because it was a lot cheaper back in the day to film without sound so to make up for it the makers recorded a shitload of narration in post production. Now you&#8217;ve probably heard me complain about too much narration in past posts but this one takes the cake. Here we have scenes where characters are clearly talking but instead of being dubbed in, a narrator just takes care of all their dialogue. &#8220;Martin said to James blah blah, James thought it about for a minute.&#8221; it&#8217;s very unusual, almost like your listening to a book on tape but with images, and this is not a good read.</p>
<p>The narrator&#8217;s dialogue is so tiresome that I was almost ready to give up on this movie after a few minutes, but then the monster showed up, and man when he shows up does he show up. I can&#8217;t believe how bad this monster looks and that it actually manages to catch anyone is a miracle. They weren&#8217;t lying when they called this terror &#8220;Creeping&#8221; it&#8217;s so slow that the only way it can kill people is basically whenever someone is stupid enough to fall into it.</p>
<p>You can basically split this movie up into two parts; 1. Explaining why there&#8217;s a monster and what everyone thinks about it and 2. The never-ending monster attack. And the sounds this thing makes! &#8220;Urgh, bleh, Uhh!&#8221; it sounds like a guy throwing up and that&#8217;s just what this film is, a big ol&#8217; pile of puke.</p>
<p>The Creeping Terror in action! Can you tell what&#8217;s going on here?<br />
<a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3125" rel="attachment wp-att-3125"><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-3125" title="Creepingterrorimage" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Creepingterrorimage-479x359.jpg" alt="" width="479" height="359" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3124</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 7</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3056</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3056#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 07:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3056</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eegah (1962) Best known as the iconic steel-toothed &#8220;Jaws&#8221; from the Bond films The Spy Who Loved Me and Moonraker Richard Kiel may be the most famous 7&#8217;2&#8243; actor to ever grace the screen. An advantage that gave him countless roles as various thugs and monsters it will always be this particular film that will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Eegah (1962)</span></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3058" rel="attachment wp-att-3058"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/eegah_poster_01-196x300.jpg" alt="" title="eegah_poster_01" width="199" height="300" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-3058" /></a>Best known as the iconic steel-toothed &#8220;Jaws&#8221; from the Bond films <i>The Spy Who Loved Me</I> and <i>Moonraker</I> Richard Kiel may be the most famous 7&#8217;2&#8243; actor to ever grace the screen. An advantage that gave him countless roles as various thugs and monsters it will always be this particular film that will stand as his most infamous. The film is <i>Eegah</I> and it&#8217;s the harrowing tale of an eon old caveman that terrorizes teens in the California desert. It&#8217;s got a heartbreaking love story, suspense, action, even a little crooning, so it has something for everyone! </p>
<p>Our film begins when hip teen Roxy Miller (Marilyn Manning) is driving to a party through the California desert. Roxy stops by a gas station where were introduced to her fugly, geetar strummin&#8217;, sweetheart Tom (Arch Hall Jr. the director&#8217;s son.) Sadly Tom has to wait until his shift is over to go the party but he fondly passes the time by telling gas station customers about his swell girl Roxy &#8220;That&#8217;s my girl, her father is Robert I. Miller. You should see her swim, she lives up at the club!&#8221; I&#8217;m sure that customer was really impressed.</p>
<p>But we all know you shouldn&#8217;t drive through the desert at night because wuh oh! There&#8217;s giant cavemen living out there! Luckily or unluckily Roxy escapes from a caveman attack and hurries back to her sweetheart and father Robert I. Miller (Arch Hall Sr.) who writes &#8220;Adventure Books&#8221; whatever those are. So instead of reporting it to the police Richard I. Miller decides to head out the next day and look for the caveman because he writes adventure books. Heading out in his explorer gear (pith helmet included) Richard somehow stumbles upon the caveman and is knocked unconscious by being lightly pushed over into sand. </p>
<p>Meanwhile Tom serenades Roxy by a pool in a musical segment that would make the Everly Brothers vomit with rage. The song is called &#8220;Vicki&#8221; but I guess his girlfriend &#8220;ROXY&#8221; likes it anyway. After this painfully ear shattering ordeal Tom and Roxy go to find their father in the desert in Tom&#8217;s dune buggy. Though Tom is apparently &#8220;all about&#8221; this dune buggy as they spend about two to three minutes joyriding to 60s guitar music. This is where I first notice how much dialogue and sound in general must of been recorded much later because the additional sound rarely synchs up well and never matches the same room tone. </p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3067" rel="attachment wp-att-3067"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/eegah6.jpg" alt="" title="eegah6" width="400" height="273" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3067" /></a></p>
<p>So time flies, they worry about the whereabouts of Richard, Tom sings another song about &#8220;Vitamins&#8221; and &#8220;Galleries&#8221; or something and then boom! Roxy is attacked by the caveman and taken back to his cave. This is where we really get to know Eegah the forever grumbling and bumbling giant who actually has a heart. Here we are as well reunited with a Richard. Dead bodies surround the walls of the cave which Richard has learned are Eegah&#8217;s relatives. How he knows this I have no idea as Eegah really can&#8217;t say anything but &#8220;Eegah!&#8221; Richard also says &#8220;Eegah&#8221; is his name cause that&#8217;s all he can say, kind of like a Pokemon. Oh yeah and Eegah has survived for centuries by drinking sulfur water. Wow, Richard sure learned a lot while being held captive by a caveman who doesn&#8217;t speak english. </p>
<p>Seeing how much time I&#8217;ve spent on the plot let me try and wrap this up. Basically it&#8217;s your typical &#8220;Teens terrorized by a monster&#8221; movie with lots of running, yelling, and pointless filler. Characters are incredibly stupid, they faint constantly, and never seem to have anything important or interesting to say. <i>Eegah</I> has it&#8217;s funny moments but the filler scenes just make me cringe. Fortunately there&#8217;s a very funny <i>Mystery Science Theater 3000</I> that makes this film remotely watchable, check it and you&#8217;ll have a gay old time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3056</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>American Gothic</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3043</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3043#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 22:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How appropriate that in midst of &#8220;Shocktober&#8221; a show like this premieres on television? The latest from Ryan Murphy and Brad Falchuk the creators of Nip/Tuck and ugh Glee have returned to FX with their latest off the wall series American Horror Story. Did I say off the wall? What I meant to say is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/151258_first-look-ryan-murphys-american-horror-story.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><p>How appropriate that in midst of &#8220;Shocktober&#8221; a show like this premieres on television? The latest from Ryan Murphy and Brad Falchuk the creators of <i>Nip/Tuck</I> and ugh <i>Glee</I> have returned to FX with their latest off the wall series <i>American Horror Story</I>. Did I say off the wall? What I meant to say is that when it comes to shows like this there are no walls. I have mixed feelings about this A.D.D Amityville Horror-like series but if there&#8217;s one thing I know for sure I&#8217;ve never seen a show like this. </p>
<p>The premise is your average haunted house scenario; a family already with some tension brewing under the surface looking for a fresh start blah blah, haunted house. Connie Brtton of <i>Friday Night Lights</I> fame stars as Vivien Harmon a former concert cellist still trying to get over a tragic miscarriage and her husband&#8217;s unfaithfulness. AS Vivien&#8217;s cheating husband Ben you have <i>The Practice&#8217;s</i> Dylan McDermott, a psychiatrist who also sleepwalks. Along with their daughter Violet (Taissa Farmiga) the three purchase a moody house in Los Angeles with a dark past. By dark past I mean murder, murder, and some more murder which they are all told about by a series of unusual locals, the most notable being Jessica Lange as Constance an intrusive and almost sinister-like neighbor of the family. </p>
<p>What follows is typical fright fest fare with mysterious sounds, sights, and hallucinations but there&#8217;s nothing typical about the way this show is presented. <i>AHS</I> for one has some of the most erratic quick paced editing I&#8217;ve ever seen. I assume the effect here is to give the viewer a an unnerving and disjointed experience, a gimmick I like and don&#8217;t like it. Frenetic editing in scenes that are intended to be all out crazy are a thrill. You&#8217;ll most likely just be sitting there scratching your head and asking yourself &#8220;What the hell did I just see?&#8221; That&#8217;s fun, but in moderation in normal conversation scenes it&#8217;s just simply annoying. In a way you could say this show is trying too hard not just visually but also with pacing. I get the feeling that they don&#8217;t want anyone to ever be bored so they keep loading us up with crazy images and crazy sounds. What the crew behind <i>AHS</I> don&#8217;t seem to realize is that sometimes viewers need more of the slower moments to create a balance, that way it will strengthen the intensity of the more intense moments.</p>
<p>Story wise everything is simple enough though I can definitely see this as a show that has the potential to get needlessly complicated. The fact that Dylan McDermott sleepwalks and sees things could get a little out of hand but for now it&#8217;s fine. For the most part I enjoyed the story and the characters who are all ably performed by a talented cast. Connie Britton is perhaps the standout but one can&#8217;t deny that Jessica Lange is successful when it comes to dealing out the heebie jeebies. I liked the large assortment of oddballs and nutjobs that the family encountered and look forward to what other weirdos will show up. </p>
<p>If the folks behind <i>AHS</I> really want ensure the success of this show I&#8217;d recommend they slow things down a little, though I doubt that will happen. It&#8217;s hard to see how a haunted house show will continually stay fresh or plausible. Already I&#8217;m wondering &#8220;Why don&#8217;t they just live somewhere else this place is insane!&#8221; But if they keep things under control it could work. I don&#8217;t know how much longer I&#8217;ll keep with this show considering how annoyed I am by the overuse of flashy visuals, that&#8217;s either one of those I&#8217;m going to get used to or not get used to. <i>American Horror Story</I> is a somewhat fun addition to <i>FX&#8217;</I> already diverse lineup and though I didn&#8217;t love it I liked that it was different and I&#8217;ll probably check it out at least a few more times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3043</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 6</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3023</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3023#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 16:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Beast of Yucca Flats (1961) Another crappy classic I reviewed many full moons ago, let&#8217;s revisit the heart pounding thriller that is The Beast of Yucca Flats. This frightful Tor Johnson vehicle stars Tor as famous soviet scientist (yeah right) Joseph Javorsky who has just arrived in Yucca Flats, Nevada only to be ambushed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">The Beast of Yucca Flats (1961)</span></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=3024" rel="attachment wp-att-3024"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-3024" title="the-beast-of-yucca-flats" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/the-beast-of-yucca-flats.jpg" alt="" width="199" height="300" /></a>Another crappy classic I reviewed many full moons ago, let&#8217;s revisit the heart pounding thriller that is <em>The Beast of Yucca Flats</em>. This frightful Tor Johnson vehicle stars Tor as famous soviet scientist (yeah right) Joseph Javorsky who has just arrived in Yucca Flats, Nevada only to be ambushed by KGB assassins. Fleeing into the desert Javorsky accidentally wanders on to a nuclear test site, don&#8217;t you hate it when that happens? This results in Javorsky turning into a mad atomic beast who seems to have a lot of trouble breathing and walking while terrorizing people near and around the desert.</p>
<p>This low budget and infamously terrible Coleman Francis flick even manages to top Ed Wood from time to time with plot holes as big as the grand canyon. Filmed without sound the film makes heavy use of narration. The only thing is that the narrator never tells us anything we can&#8217;t already figure out. The film is so mind numbingly simple yet still contains some huge errors. For instance our protagonists which are two cops set out after the beast with virtually no leads. They don&#8217;t know what it looks like (leading to a hilarious scene where they shoot a civilian with a rifle from a plane) they don&#8217;t know where they are going and how do they even know it&#8217;s a &#8220;Beast&#8221;? No one has any evidence in the film that the killer is not human they just automatically assume it&#8217;s a monster. I never seen characters that were so willing to believe in monsters based on absolutely nothing.</p>
<p>Francis was well known for his less than stellar productions of the 50s and 60s but this one tops the cake. Really it was more or less an excuse to put the intimidating Tor Johnson into the role of a monster to make a few bucks, but Tor really doesn&#8217;t do much of anything here. He was severely overweight and could barely move, it&#8217;s like watching a dying sloth. A much more accurate title for this movie would of been &#8220;Revenge of the Slow Fat Guy with Breathing Problems.&#8221;</p>
<p>Gaze your eyes at the most terrifying monster of all time!<br />
<iframe width="479" height="355" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/S9aa5Rf3-SU" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3023</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>R.I.P. Steve Jobs</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3018</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3018#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 08:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=3018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every single day, everyone at Mildly Pleased uses an Apple product. Personally, I spend most of my day with Apple products, between all the work I do on my iMac and all the procrastinating I do with my iPhone. Steve Jobs has been the face of Apple for so long it&#8217;s easy to think of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/jobs.png" width="240" />
		</p><p>Every single day, everyone at Mildly Pleased uses an Apple product. Personally, I spend most of my day with Apple products, between all the work I do on my iMac and all the procrastinating I do with my iPhone. Steve Jobs has been the face of Apple for so long it&#8217;s easy to think of him as the man responsible for all that they&#8217;ve accomplished. That would be forgetting all the hard work that plenty of others put into each product they&#8217;ve launched, but it shows how prolific an individual he was.</p>
<p>I first took notice of Apple when Mac OS X came out. Before that, they were just the weird alternative computers that I saw in schools and the occasional household. But Mac OS X struck me for its UI. After years of looking at bland, grey desktops, Apple Aqua theme was amazing. It was so colorful and clean. That was enough to get me interested in Macs, and I started altering my Windows machine to emulate the Macintosh interface. Windows XP was a big step forward for Microsoft and a revolutionary OS in its own right, but we&#8217;ve had two versions of Windows since then. Apple is still iterating on OS X.</p>
<p>I never liked portable CD players. I tended to buy ones with skipping problems, or maybe I was just an irresponsible portable CD player owner. By junior high, most of the music I was listening to was on my computer, thanks to the magic of ripping CDs and the brief revolution of Napster. I was too lazy to burn CDs most of the time, so music was not that big a part of my life. Worse, I was stuck using the clunky Windows Media Player or the so-flexible-it-was-intimidating WinAmp for my musical needs. Then, and I clearly remember this day in 2003, Apple finally released iTunes for Windows. Obviously this was the logical, money-making move, but I thought it an extraordinary gift. What benevolence from them, to give me access to this amazing musical store and resource-hogging application! iTunes has been my only media player since. I bought my first song, &#8220;I Believe in a Thing Called Love&#8221; in March of 2004 using a Pepsi bottle cap. I haven&#8217;t bought a CD, aside from a souvenir in Japan, since. I got an iPod, a used third generation model, for Christmas. At the time, it was the coolest thing I owned, even though people were walking around with the cool color-screened fourth generation ones already. That iPod I have replaced three times, but it is still used by the family.</p>
<p>It was my birthday and a schoolday when my family gifted me my first Mac. A PowerBook G4, a real beauty. They gave it to me in the morning and I barely got to use it before I had to leave to go miss the bus. I waited all day for the chance to go home and play with my laptop again. At the time, I already had my own computer, a PC my dad had helped me build that was superior to my PowerBook in every way, from a technical standpoint. But instantly my Mac became my default machine. I used it every day up until my birthday in 2008, when I got my second Mac, the iMac I am writing this post on. That PowerBook has been used well beyond reason, but I can&#8217;t let it go. If it were a PC, I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;d have disposed of it long ago.</p>
<p>My first iPhone, now Nancy&#8217;s phone, was the most amazing thing. Imagine, a device that could deliver to me all the world&#8217;s information. That could connect me with anyone I was looking for. &#8220;There&#8217;s an app for that&#8221; might sound a little contrived to us now, but if you think of it, it&#8217;s pretty extraordinary. I walk around with technology today that would have seemed outlandish by science fiction standards just a few years ago. Time and time again, Apple has amazed me with the products they put out. I balked at the iPad, but like it or not, it&#8217;s changing the face of computers. I wouldn&#8217;t have predicted that, but Steve Jobs did.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the insight and leadership the world will be missing today. Because you simply cannot deny his track record. After starting Pixar and returning to Apple, Steve Jobs led the company to Mac OS X, the iPod, iTunes, iPhone and the iPad. He turned dreams into reality. He was one of the most involved and beloved CEOs of all time. And he&#8217;ll be missed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3018</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 5</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2980</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2980#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 07:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Plan 9 from Outer Space (1959) I don&#8217;t know how this film became the poster child for all bad movies but it certainly is a doozy. Ed Wood&#8217;s grand opus of sci-fi shlock has has somehow become a cult phenomenon in the last thirty years and is now considered required viewing for any fan of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Plan 9 from Outer Space (1959)</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=2984" rel="attachment wp-att-2984"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-2984" title="Plan 9" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Plan-9.jpg" alt="" width="199" height="300" /></a>I don&#8217;t know how this film became the poster child for all bad movies but it certainly is a doozy. Ed Wood&#8217;s grand opus of sci-fi shlock has has somehow become a cult phenomenon in the last thirty years and is now considered required viewing for any fan of the strange or absurd. Who is to say what makes this film the grand campy classic that it is? Is it the cheap special effects? Is it the corny performances? Is it all of the above? Yes and more because this may possibly be the best worst movie ever made.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s start with that tile &#8220;Plan 9 from Outer Space&#8221; great sci-fi title though I would of been just as amused with Wood&#8217;s original title &#8220;Grave Robbers from Outer Space&#8221;. The premise isn&#8217;t actually that bad but it&#8217;s handled with such incompetence, possibly due to the low budget or hasty production or maybe the fact that campy was all Ed Wood knew. So the humans are developing Solaranite (a sun-powered bomb) and in an effort to stop them aliens have decided to resurrect the dead because as well all know nuclear weapons are no match for zombies. This is the best plan a race of space traveling aliens could come up with? Not to mention this plan only creates about three zombies, yeah real threatening.</p>
<p>Aside from it&#8217;s convoluted plot <em>Plan 9</em> is also infamous as Bela Lugosi&#8217;s last film, though I would hardly call silently wandering around a graveyard a performance. Of course star power can boost any low budget flick but Ed probably included Bela even more so as a tribute to his fallen friend. Other Wood notables include Tor Johnson and Vampira, they may not do much but they sure look cool doing it. <a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=2993" rel="attachment wp-att-2993"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2993" title="600full-plan-9-from-outer-space-screenshot" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/600full-plan-9-from-outer-space-screenshot.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="299" /></a> What I love about <em>Plan 9</em> is that it isn&#8217;t as much a series of scenes progressing the story as it is a collection of many upon many mistakes. It has the worst continuity I&#8217;ve ever seen, bad performances, the worst sci-fi effects, people knocking over cardboard tomb stones, actors reading from the script and the list goes on! Who would of ever thought that this would become a hit so many years after it&#8217;s release? What does future hold for this film? As TV psychic Criswell memorably said in his opening introduction to the film &#8220;Future events such as these will affect you in the future.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2980</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>C.A.T: Paranoid</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2949</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2949#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 16:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Black Sabbath &#8211; Paranoid (1970) I do whatever I can to get into the Halloween spirit every October and that usually includes my own soundtrack. Mostly it comprises of horror movie soundtracks but I usually throw in a few rock bands that I believe embody the spooky spirit of the season and for some reason [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Black Sabbath &#8211; <em>Paranoid</em> (1970)</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=2950" rel="attachment wp-att-2950"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Black_Sabbath_Paranoid_Frontal-150x150.jpg" alt="" title="Black_Sabbath_Paranoid_Frontal" width="200" height="200" class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-2950" /></a>I do whatever I can to get into the Halloween spirit every October and that usually includes my own soundtrack. Mostly it comprises of horror movie soundtracks but I usually throw in a few rock bands that I believe embody the spooky spirit of the season and for some reason <i>Black Sabbath</I>  has always felt like one of those bands. First I think it has to be that name &#8220;Black Sabbath&#8221; I feel like I&#8217;ve heard several different stories regarding the name but the most common/popular story seems to be that the band named themselves after the 1963 horror film of the same name starring Boris Karloff. Second has to be that iconic dark and sludgy sound that made <i>Sabbath</I> the now proclaimed &#8220;Kings of Heavy Metal&#8221;. This can partly be attributed to Tony Iommi&#8217;s low brooding guitar sound of course it&#8217;s miraculous that he became a guitar player at all considering he lost  the tips of his middle and ring finger in an industrial accident, that&#8217;s some <i>Saw</I> shit right there. </p>
<p>Picking which <i>Sabbath</i> album to do isn&#8217;t much of chore when you have a record like <i>Paranoid</I>, <i>Sabbath&#8217;s</i> second album. Just look at the names of these songs; &#8220;War Pigs&#8221;, &#8220;Iron Man&#8221;, &#8220;Electric Funeral&#8221;, &#8220;Hand of Doom&#8221; this is some dark shit but man does it sound great. This is the kind of sound that any pot smoking, aspiring garage band of the day would of killed to have but there was only one <i>Sabbath</I>. Iommi&#8217;s riffs were some of the best of the early 70s and more people probably would of noticed if it hadn&#8217;t been for Jimi &#8220;M&#8217;FN&#8221; Page taking the hard rock spotlight in those days (that guy&#8217;s the shit.) Bill Ward and Geezer Butler are a classic hard rock rhythm section and Ozzy had a voice that just didn&#8217;t sound quite like anyone else. Not to mention this is a band that really knows how to play off each other, resulting in some gnarly headbangers. One of my favorite elements of <i>Sabbath&#8217;s</I> sound is how every song is built. There is almost always that slow droning part in the beginning that overtime launches into a faster rockin&#8217; part, but it never goes on too long. Every song on this album is exactly as long as it needs to be and every note is perfectly in place. </p>
<p>The songs are some of the group&#8217;s best with the iconic &#8220;Iron Man&#8221; leading the pack as the group&#8217;s most defining tune. &#8220;War Pigs&#8221; is eight minutes of pure sludge rock bliss and &#8220;Paranoid&#8221;? It&#8217;s god damn Paranoid, it&#8217;s awesome! I can&#8217;t believe the group actually wrote that song in about 25 minutes after they were told the album needed a single, wow. &#8220;Planet Caravan&#8221; is great insight into the softer side of the group but it&#8217;s the heavy rockers that make this album memorable. If you&#8217;ve never heard it I highly recommend it. You don&#8217;t have to like heavy metal (I don&#8217;t consider myself a fan) but it&#8217;s rock and roll at it&#8217;s best and everybody likes to rock, especially when it&#8217;s &#8220;Rocktober!&#8221;</p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;Hand of Doom&#8221;, &#8220;Paranoid&#8221;, &#8220;War Pigs&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2949</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 4</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2903</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2903#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 16:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Killer Shrews (1959) &#8220;Those who hunt by night will tell you that wildest and most vicious of all animals is the tiny shrew.&#8221; I don&#8217;t think you could ask for a better introduction to one of the best films about giant, poisonous, rodents ever made.Thorne Sherman (James Best) and first mate Griswold (Judge Henry [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">The Killer Shrews (1959)</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=2905" rel="attachment wp-att-2905"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/killer_shrews_poster_01-199x300.jpg" alt="" title="killer_shrews_poster_01" width="199" height="300" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-2905" /></a>&#8220;Those who hunt by night will tell you that wildest and most vicious of all animals is the tiny shrew.&#8221; I don&#8217;t think you could ask for a better introduction to one of the best films about giant, poisonous, rodents ever made.Thorne Sherman (James Best) and first mate Griswold (Judge Henry Depree) have sailed to a remote island to deliver supplies to a small research team. What kind of research team? There&#8217;s a drunk guy, a swedish woman who believes shrews are &#8220;The most horrible animal on the face of the earth&#8221; and this scientist that plans to eliminate world hunger by shrinking people. Yeah, he&#8217;s gonna make people smaller so they don&#8217;t have to eat as much, flawless logic.</p>
<p>With the report of an incoming hurricane Sherman is advised to stay on the island but we doesn&#8217;t know is that the island is also inhabited by somewhere between 200-300 giant shrews that weigh between 50-100lbs! I don&#8217;t know if somebody went out and counted or weighed them all, they just know. Somehow these shrews were accidentally created by the German professor&#8217;s experiments. I mean that makes perfect sense, he&#8217;s trying to shrink stuff so he ends up with giant shrews, I&#8217;m sold.</p>
<p>The bulk of the action (or lack thereof) in <em>The Killer Shrews</em> is expository dialogue about the science of the shrews. Did you know that killer shrews are &#8220;More poisonous than snakes&#8221; and that their appetite is so great that if you trapped two of them together one would eat the other? If that&#8217;s so then why are there 300 Killer shrews on the island? There&#8217;s only like five people and they&#8217;re pretty hard to get to so why so many shrews? And for a movie about shrews there sure are a lot of cast members that have trouble saying &#8220;shrew&#8221;. Both the German scientist and Swedish woman always sound like they&#8217;re saying &#8220;shoes&#8221;, &#8220;Watch out for the shoes!&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=2910" rel="attachment wp-att-2910"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2910" title="killershrews4" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/killershrews4.jpg" alt="" width="470" height="290" /></a></p>
<p>How does this film address it&#8217;s own gaping plot holes? Why with more plot holes of course. I mean who really wanted to write a second draft of <em>The Killer Shrews</em>? It&#8217;s either that or they felt like they&#8217;d immediately struck gold and didn&#8217;t feel the need to &#8220;polish&#8221; the story. One scene that comes to mind is when the swedish woman threatens our hero with a gun because he wants to go out in the woods with the shrews. If you&#8217;re so concerned about his well being than why are you pointing a gun at him? Oh and I&#8217;ve almost forgotten the crowning achievement of the whole film, the &#8220;giant shrews.&#8221; They&#8217;re dogs, clearly dogs dressed up in ridiculous costumes. They act like dogs, they perform like dogs and they&#8217;re hardly scary they&#8217;re actually kind of funny.</p>
<p>But you know what? This film was a joy to watch, parts of it anyway. So if you&#8217;re really drunk, or really bored, or really stupid, maybe you&#8217;ll enjoy watching these ravenous shoes.</p>
<p>This scene right here actually scared me. Look for the seamless blending between puppet and dog.<br />
<iframe width="479" height="355" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/jsgkUsIyExc" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2903</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 3</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2861</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2861#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 00:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Robot vs. The Aztec Mummy (1957) Have you ever seen a movie where you had no recollection of seeing it right after watching it? That&#8217;s what happened to me after watching The Robot vs. The Aztec Mummy an incredibly dry b-movie from Mexico. I wasn&#8217;t lying when I said some of these were going [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">The Robot vs. The Aztec Mummy (1957)</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=2863" rel="attachment wp-att-2863"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Aztec.jpg" alt="" title="Aztec" width="220" height="315" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-2863" /></a>Have you ever seen a movie where you had no recollection of seeing it right after watching it? That&#8217;s what happened to me after watching <i>The Robot vs. The Aztec Mummy</I> an incredibly dry b-movie from Mexico. I wasn&#8217;t lying when I said some of these were going to be shorter than others which means today is one of those lazy days. </p>
<p><i>The Robot vs. The Aztec Mummy</I> aka <i>The Aztec Mummy Against the Humanoid Robot</I> aka <i>La mom azteca el robot humano</I> is about a scientist that builds a robot to steal an Aztec treasure from a tomb guarded by an ancient mummy. I know, that sounds awesome right? WRONG! This film is so, so boring and I made the mistake of watching it a year ago, so I&#8217;m sorry to say… I&#8217;ve practically forgotten everything. So why even review it? Well I couldn&#8217;t find a film quickly enough to replace it. Some of these I watch far in advance so later they can sometimes become painful, blurred memories. </p>
<p>The few things I can recall is the annoying amount of flashbacks detailing the Aztec&#8217;s rituals, annoying narration/poor additional audio recording and the fact the mummy in this film looks SO BAD. So I&#8217;m gonna call it here but don&#8217;t worry I got a good one tomorrow. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a fear-tastic trailer of today&#8217;s film!<br />
<iframe width="479" height="355" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/ZhsFAt9ju2o" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2861</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 2</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2785</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2785#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 03:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bride of the Monster (1955) You just can&#8217;t do a bad movie retrospective without some mention of the legendary Edward D. Wood Jr. Famously known as &#8220;The World&#8217;s Worst Director&#8221; though I think that could be debated today, cough Uwe Boll, cough, cough, but there&#8217;s something special about Wood&#8217;s movies much in the way that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Bride of the Monster (1955)</span></td>
<td width="150"><i"http://sites.google.com/damorgue.org/home/" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>
<a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=2874" rel="attachment wp-att-2874"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Bride-of-the-Monster-Poster2.jpg" alt="" title="Bride-of-the-Monster-Poster" width="220" height="315" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-2874" /></a>You just can&#8217;t do a bad movie retrospective without some mention of the legendary Edward D. Wood Jr. Famously known as &#8220;The World&#8217;s Worst Director&#8221; though I think that could be debated today, cough Uwe Boll, cough, cough, but there&#8217;s something special about Wood&#8217;s movies much in the way that a child is special.</p>
<p><em>Bride of the Monster</em> is more or less your typical cliche b-movie. Dr Eric Vornoff (Bela Lugosi in his last speaking role) is experimenting with atomic energy along with his mute assistant Lobo, (Swedish wrestler Tor Johnson) to create a race of &#8220;Atomic Supermen&#8221; to take over the world. So a handful of really boring supporting characters investigate Vornoff&#8217;s mansion, which is of course guarded by a giant octopus and what follows is a series of laughable conversations and unintentionally awkward effects. Of course it&#8217;s all excellently &#8220;chronicled&#8221; in the 1994 Tim Burton film <em>Ed Wood</em>, probably my favorite movie about making movies.</p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=2829" rel="attachment wp-att-2829"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2529" title="tumblr_ljigmrXTdu1qf83cro1_500" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/tumblr_ljigmrXTdu1qf83cro1_500.jpg" alt="" width="460" /></a></p>
<p>Though what&#8217;s really puzzling is &#8220;Where is the monster?&#8221; Is it Vornoff? Is it Lobo? Is it the octopus? Knowing that Ed Wood often came up with the titles of his films before the actual idea I&#8217;m sure there is no clear cut answer. Out of all the Wood films I&#8217;ve seen this is probably my favorite just for Lugosi and the cheesiness oozing out of every pore of his villainous visage. It also has one of the best/worst man vs. octopus fights ever captured on film. If that&#8217;s not some worth applause I don&#8217;t know what is.</p>
<p>And below is one of the lamest/greatest b-movie endings of all time.<br />
<iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/q9xmXzd2m6g" frameborder="0" width="479" height="355"></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2785</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>117</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I&#8217;m Not With You</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2799</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2799#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 22:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Red Hot Chili Peppers &#8211; I&#8217;m With You Have I outgrown the Red Hot Chili Peppers, or have they just failed to outgrow themselves?  That&#8217;s really the question I keep asking myself when I listen to this album, and it&#8217;s probably a little bit of both.  I really just haven&#8217;t gotten much joy out of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Red Hot Chili Peppers &#8211; <em>I&#8217;m With You</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/2.5.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=2800" rel="attachment wp-att-2800"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-2800" title="red-hot-chili-peppers-album-im-with-you-album-7216-1309908193-1" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/red-hot-chili-peppers-album-im-with-you-album-7216-1309908193-1-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Have I outgrown the Red Hot Chili Peppers, or have they just failed to outgrow themselves?  That&#8217;s really the question I keep asking myself when I listen to this album, and it&#8217;s probably a little bit of both.  I really just haven&#8217;t gotten much joy out of listening to the latest release from the Chili Peppers, which sucks since you know, they&#8217;ve usually been the kind of band that you could always rely on for a good time.</p>
<p>Of course the biggest difference between <em>I&#8217;m With You</em> and the last three RHCP albums is that it doesn&#8217;t feature the melodic guitar work and soaring back-up vocals of John Frusciante.  In his place is&#8230;some guy, I&#8217;m not gonna go to the trouble of looking up his name, but the point is that he&#8217;s not John Frusciante.  Sure, he&#8217;s got the chops to hang with such accomplished musicians as Flea and Chad Smith, but he just doesn&#8217;t have any of the heart and soul that Frusciante had.  Then again, maybe this album would&#8217;ve been just as middling had Frusciante stayed with the band, since the album features a lot of the same mid-tempo jam-like material that the Chili Peppers were throwing down when he was in the band.</p>
<p>Still, one thing about <em>I&#8217;m With You</em> is that it does features some of those moments where the Chili&#8217;s just bust into some anthemic chorus, like on &#8220;Brendan&#8217;s Death Song&#8221; or &#8220;The Adventures Of Rain Dance Maggie&#8221;.  Those moments are nice, and remind you of why these guys have stayed popular for so long, but there&#8217;s just way too many tired punk-funk jams which aren&#8217;t being done any favors by Anthony Keidis&#8217;s reliably ridiculous lyrics.</p>
<p>Unlike most music snobs, I have a special place in my heart for the Red Hot Chili Peppers, since they were really the only band I can remember liking from elementary school all the way up until high school.  But sorry guys, maybe it&#8217;s about time you hang up the tube socks and call it a day.</p>
<p><strong>Favorite Tracks:</strong> &#8220;Monarchy Of Roses&#8221;, &#8220;Brendan&#8217;s Death Song&#8221;, &#8220;The Adventures Of Rain Dance Maggie&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2799</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>September Girls</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2789</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2789#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 22:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Girls &#8211; Father, Son, Holy Ghost Sorry to interrupt Shlocktober at such an early state, but there&#8217;s a couple of posts I need to get out of the way. So far this year, there&#8217;ve been quite a few releases from bands that I&#8217;ve really liked in the past, but it seems like most of them [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Girls &#8211; <em>Father, Son, Holy Ghost</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=2794" rel="attachment wp-att-2794"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-2794" title="GIRLS-Father-Son-Holy-Ghost" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/GIRLS-Father-Son-Holy-Ghost2-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Sorry to interrupt Shlocktober at such an early state, but there&#8217;s a couple of posts I need to get out of the way.</p>
<p>So far this year, there&#8217;ve been quite a few releases from bands that I&#8217;ve really liked in the past, but it seems like most of them have been at least a little disappointing.  So it&#8217;s nice that SF band Girls has put out a darker and weirder, but nonetheless satisfying follow-up to their 2009 debut, one of my favorite albums of that year.</p>
<p>In this day and age, nostalgia can get you pretty far just as long as you know how to milk it in all the right ways.  Girls is a great example of this, as their music is pretty firmly entrenched in the poppy sounds of the sixties and seventies.  However, this time around they don&#8217;t just limit themselves to the sunshine surf rock of their first album, although that sound is certainly apparent in the bouncy optimism of &#8220;Honey Bunny&#8221;.  But on <em>Father, Son, Holy Ghost,</em> there&#8217;s a surprisingly grandiose quality to the Sabbath-like riffage on &#8220;Die&#8221;, or &#8220;Vomit&#8221;, which kind of reminds me of Pink Floyd&#8217;s more arena-bound material.</p>
<p>Really, there is no one defining sound on <em>Father, Son, Holy Ghost</em>, and though I guess that kind of inconsistency might be off-putting to some, I think that&#8217;s what makes it a really fun album.  Plus through all the different mood swings you&#8217;ve got the always welcome presence of singer/songwriter Chrisopher Owens.  He&#8217;s really one of the most endearing indie frontmen I can think of, since his voice has this very soft and vulnerable sound to it and he never seems afraid to bear his soul, which makes it that much easier to get caught up in the joy as well as the sorrow of Girls&#8217; music.</p>
<p><strong>Favorite Tracks:</strong> &#8220;Honey Bunny&#8221;, &#8220;Saying I Love You&#8221;, &#8220;Love Like A River&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2789</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>101</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 1</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2751</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2751#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 23:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Robot Monster (1953) Here it is in all it&#8217;s glory the sci-fi triumph of the silver screen Robot Monster! If you&#8217;ve ever read my past Shocktober entries then you may of remember that I reviewed this a year or two ago, but let&#8217;s recap anyways. Robot Monster was one of many in the &#8220;Atomic Shit&#8221; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Robot Monster (1953)</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-2757" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/robot_monster.jpg" alt="" width="220" height="315"/>Here it is in all it&#8217;s glory the sci-fi triumph of the silver screen <em>Robot Monster</em>! If you&#8217;ve ever read my past Shocktober entries then you may of remember that I reviewed this a year or two ago, but let&#8217;s recap anyways. <em>Robot Monster</em> was one of many in the &#8220;Atomic Shit&#8221; as I like to call it, craze of the 1950s. Ya know movies about giant insects, radiation, alien invaders and whatever. It was a golden age for b-movies and from it we got some of the greatest, some of the worst, and some of the most memorable &#8220;so bad they are good&#8221; flicks like <em>Robot Monster</em>.</p>
<p>Written and directed by Phil Tucker who was only in his early 20s at the time, <em>Robot Monster</em> was shot on a minuscule budget in an outstandingly quick four day session. Even with the results I think that shows some great initiative and effort. I like to think that at least every film ever made at least deserves a half star just for the fact that it was finished, but enough of that, let&#8217;s get down to the shit.</p>
<p>The brilliant premise follows the evil alien “Ro-Man”, who I guess is also a robot, and his one man invasion of Earth. We pick up the story after Ro-Man has apparently killed all but eight people with his death ray. These eight people have somehow become immune to Ro-Man&#8217;s death ray and have therefore decided to fight back, even if it takes all the mighty stupidity they have at their disposal.</p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=2753" rel="attachment wp-att-2753"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/robotmonster6-479x359.jpg" alt="" width="470" height="330" class="alignnone size-large wp-image-2753" /></a></p>
<p>So that&#8217;s fine and dandy but I do have a few queries. First off, why is the supposed “Robot Monster” a guy in a gorilla costume with a space helmet? What is he the lost member of the Banana Splits? He’s supposed to be some fearless, emotionless, destroyer yet he&#8217;s a complete joke, not to mention how easily distracted he is by women. So you&#8217;re telling me this guy destroyed everyone else on Earth? Everyone in this movie is a complete moron yet they are all that’s left?</p>
<p>Adding to the already immense shit foundation this film is built on, the dialogue is juvenile and laughable in the saddest way and the flow of the film is always flat. On the other hand <i>R.M</i> has gained somewhat of a cult following for appearing on <em>Mystery Science Theater 3000</em>, so at least it has that going for it. I hope this didn&#8217;t annoy or sadden you too much cause we still got 30 days left.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2751</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>119</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Welcome to Shlocktober</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2735</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2735#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 08:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can&#8217;t believe it&#8217;s already that time of year again! Naturally part of me is excited but also a little overwhelmed at all the posts I&#8217;ll have to write to keep up with all 31 days of &#8220;Shocktober&#8221;. For those unfamiliar with this theme I&#8217;ll be reviewing 31 horror movies in 31 days, although this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Creature_from_the_Haunted_Sea.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><p>I can&#8217;t believe it&#8217;s already that time of year again! Naturally part of me is excited but also a little overwhelmed at all the posts I&#8217;ll have to write to keep up with all 31 days of &#8220;Shocktober&#8221;. For those unfamiliar with this theme I&#8217;ll be reviewing 31 horror movies in 31 days, although this year has a special twist. This year I&#8217;ll be reviewing 31 bad horror movies, so in a way you could say it&#8217;s more like &#8220;Shlocktober&#8221;. I&#8217;ll still be doing a few other posts non-related to the bad movie theme but for the most part it&#8217;ll be 31 posts of me bitching and whining about putting myself through some real horror. I&#8217;ll be starting from the 50s (hard to find stuff as bad before this period) to modern day and review whatever crappy horror movies I&#8217;ve seen. The reviews will vary in length to long analysis&#8217; to very short (possibly one sentence) summaries. So grab your pumpkin pail and put your masks on it&#8217;s time to celebrate Shocktober!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2735</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Behind the Music: Bond Edition</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2730</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2730#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 22:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post doesn&#8217;t really have anything to do with anything relevant, I&#8217;ve just always wanted to share this. Not that this blog needs anymore Alice Cooper related posts (I still got one later for Shocktober, sorry) but I thought it would be just as good as time as any to talk about something that I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post doesn&#8217;t really have anything to do with anything relevant, I&#8217;ve just always wanted to share this. Not that this blog needs anymore Alice Cooper related posts (I still got one later for <em>Shocktober</em>, sorry) but I thought it would be just as good as time as any to talk about something that I discovered while watching Bond films last summer.</p>
<p>So last summer I was reading about all the Bond themes when I discovered that who else but the <em>Alice Cooper Band</em> recorded their own Bond song once. The year was 1973 and knowing that <em>Man with the Golden Gun</em> would be the next Bond film Cooper and his boys recorded a song called &#8220;Man with the Golden Gun&#8221; with the hope that they could get the attention of Bond producers. However the song never really took off as a single and the Bond producers instead opted a song written by Bond composer John Barry and sung by Scottish singer Lulu. So for fun I thought I&#8217;d compare both versions in videos I found that have each song set to the opening credits.</p>
<p>First I present the song by Lulu that the producers went with.<br />
<iframe width="479" height="355" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/dK75xQR19jE" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>And now the version by the <em>Alice Cooper Band</em>.<br />
<iframe width="479" height="355" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/R500VKA9-Zo" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>Going with Lulu was probably the safe decision (whatever safe is supposed to mean) but I like Cooper&#8217;s version. Though seeing as I am a Cooper fan I suppose I&#8217;m somewhat biased. What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2730</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Why are my dreams always nightmares?&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2695</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2695#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 23:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2695</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alice Cooper- Welcome 2 My Nightmare I don&#8217;t think there was ever really a moment where I thought this album would be any good. Just look at that cover it&#8217;s horrible! But I&#8217;m a big fan of Alice&#8217;s 1975 concept album Welcome to My Nightmare and when I heard he&#8217;d be reuniting with the original [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large">Alice Cooper- <em>Welcome 2 My Nightmare</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/1.5.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=2698" rel="attachment wp-att-2698"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-2698" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/AliceCooperWelcome2MyNightmare-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>I don&#8217;t think there was ever really a moment where I thought this album would be any good. Just look at that cover it&#8217;s horrible! But I&#8217;m a big fan of Alice&#8217;s 1975 concept album <em>Welcome to My Nightmare</em> and when I heard he&#8217;d be reuniting with the original <em>Alice Cooper Band</em> and producer/composer Bob Ezrin (basically Alice Cooper&#8217;s George Martin) l I had to at least give it a little taste. I mean it&#8217;s getting close to October right? And what better way to bring in the Halloween season than with a review of the latest from the king of shock rock?</p>
<p>Usually when I review something as &#8220;bad and good&#8221; I like to call it a mixed bag. So just picture a bag of halloween candy, some of it will contain delicious fun sized candy bars but some of it will also contain candy that has razors wedged inside. <em>Welcome 2 My Nightmare</em> (Bad title by the way) is more like two or three good pieces of candy and then about a dozen razors.</p>
<p>What I didn&#8217;t discover until after downloading the album is that the <em>Alice Cooper Band</em> only plays on three songs. Damn it! I&#8217;ve been fucking duped! I thought this was going to be a full on reunion! It&#8217;s always been my opinion that the <em>Alice Cooper Band</em> is what made Alice Cooper even worth listening to, I mean it was those guys that wrote the music. Don&#8217;t get me wrong, Alice is a spectacular showman but he really isn&#8217;t much of a musician.</p>
<p>On to the album in question, <em>W.2.M.N.</em> opens with the song &#8220;I Am Made of You&#8221; a song that Alice has described as an &#8220;epic masterpiece&#8221; but I have a much more appropriate word for it &#8220;bad&#8221;. I can&#8217;t believe I&#8217;m actually listening to Alice Cooper sing a song using Auto-Tune. That kills it, I don&#8217;t even care to talk about the rest of the song. From here we move into more familiar territory with some pop rock on the song &#8220;Caffeine&#8221; a passable track. Afterwards we get one of those tracks that mostly exists to progress the concept (which is someone&#8217;s nightmare by the way) called &#8220;The Nightmare Returns&#8221;, mostly Alice and piano, it&#8217;s okay. I&#8217;d like to keep going on describing each track seeing that they there all so different, but let&#8217;s skip ahead to a song that I actually like. &#8220;I&#8217;ll Bite Your Face Off&#8221; features the <em>Alice Cooper Band</em> and actually sounds like it could of been one of the band&#8217;s hit songs from the 70s, it&#8217;s easily the best thing on this album.</p>
<p>Probably the worst thing on this album is a song that features Ke$ha. Do you ever wish you could &#8220;un-hear&#8221; a song? I sure did after this. I should of stayed clear of this album just for that. Another bizarre song is a semi-electronic song called &#8220;Disco Bloodbath Boogie Fever&#8221; because disco of course as relevant as ever. I probably should of checked out the featured personnel on this album before listening; Ke$ha, Rob Zombie, John 5, Kip Winger? That&#8217;s basically everyone I hate.</p>
<p>What pains me so much is I do hear some good melodies and ideas buried under all of Ezrin&#8217;s over extravagant production. Don&#8217;t you hate it when older artists use a bunch of effects and shit to cover up the fact that they can&#8217;t sing anymore? Look at someone like Neil Young, he doesn&#8217;t hide behind anything and he&#8217;s just as good as ever. So for any Cooper fan curious about this album I suggest you just keep to the original <em>Welcome to My Nightmare</em>, that album was shockingly awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2695</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>World&#8217;s Finest</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2665</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2665#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 23:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Patton Oswalt &#8211; Finest Hour Stumbling upon this was kind of happy accident for me. There I was just browsing through the comedy section of my itunes library and wondering &#8220;I wonder when the next Patton Oswalt album comes out?&#8221; So I looked it up on the web and without any prior knowledge discovered it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large">Patton Oswalt &#8211; <em>Finest Hour</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=2667" rel="attachment wp-att-2667"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-2667" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Finest_Hour_patton_oswalt1-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Stumbling upon this was kind of happy accident for me. There I was just browsing through the comedy section of my itunes library and wondering &#8220;I wonder when the next Patton Oswalt album comes out?&#8221; So I looked it up on the web and without any prior knowledge discovered it had come out that same day, don&#8217;t you love it when stuff like that happens? Of course I was ecstatic as Patton Oswalt is my favorite standup comedian, though the origin of that is quite unusual. I missed my chance to see him at Sasquatch (this was before I was a fan) to go see <em>OK Go</em> and after hearing about it from Sean and Colin I felt the only way I could make up for it was by checking out one of his albums. Since then I&#8217;ve bought or downloaded all of Patton&#8217;s comedy albums and seen most of his specials and I gotta tell ya, it&#8217;s my kind of humor. It&#8217;s like it combines the intellectual humor I like from comics like David Cross and then the fat/lazy guy humor I like from comedians like Jim Gaffigan, so it&#8217;s the best of both worlds. Though I&#8217;m younger and I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;m quite the caliber of nerd that Patton is I can still find his humor highly relatable and easily accessible, this album is no exception.</p>
<p>Recorded at the Moore Theater in Seattle (wish I could&#8217;ve been there) Patton returns to tell more cynical misadventures from his every day life. A strong recurring theme this time seems to be sweatpants, including many jokes where Patton is wearing sweatpants with a t-shirt that&#8217;s the same color. This subject leads to an album highlight about a fat guy buying ham, a joke I had heard much about before this album came out. As a matter of fact many of this album&#8217;s best jokes are about fat guys, just the way Patton describes them. How Patton will describe a guy as &#8220;tragic avalanche fat&#8221; and then talk about that same guy eating a hamburger, &#8220;It&#8217;s like he took three bites and then reassembled it whole it in his mouth. I solved the puzzle!&#8221; I can&#8217;t get enough of his fat guy voices.</p>
<p>But Patton has always been well known for his edgy topical side as well, discussing politics or whatever is current. My favorite one here is about gay marriage and how Patton decides to make fun of some people&#8217;s blind devotion to the bible. &#8220;Just because you like something in a book doesn&#8217;t mean you can have the thing you like in the book happen in real life! That&#8217;s what crazy people want! I can&#8217;t go to the white house with a bunch of Green Lantern comics and go I WANT A GREEN LANTERN RING!&#8221; He&#8217;s always been great at tearing down issues to their most simplistic form and here he kills it.</p>
<p>Though perhaps my favorite moment in the entire show is a very brief bit where Patton talks about how he &#8220;Jock Rocks&#8221; his life by constantly singing to himself. He does a few examples but my favorite by far is when Patton sings &#8220;Jerking off to internet porn in my office when I should teach my daughter to read!&#8221; There&#8217;s so many great moments and though I&#8217;m not sure I enjoyed it as much as his last album <em>My Weakness is Strong</em> and of course nothing will ever beat <em>Werewolves and Lollipops</em> it&#8217;s another fine addition to an already stellar comedic career</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2665</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Retrospecticus: Wilco</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2609</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2609#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 03:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Retrospecticus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wasn&#8217;t really sure whether it&#8217;d be worth it to do this retrospecticus or not, but the fact of the matter is I&#8217;ve heard all of Wilco&#8217;s albums, so I figured I&#8217;d give it shot.  Much like the new Beastie Boys album, I&#8217;m not really that excited about Wilco&#8217;s new album since, let&#8217;s be honest, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn&#8217;t really sure whether it&#8217;d be worth it to do this retrospecticus or not, but the fact of the matter is I&#8217;ve heard all of Wilco&#8217;s albums, so I figured I&#8217;d give it shot.  Much like the new Beastie Boys album, I&#8217;m not really that excited about Wilco&#8217;s new album since, let&#8217;s be honest, these guys hit their peak a while ago.  Still, they managed to record one of my favorite albums of the last twenty years, so I figure they deserve it.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large"><em>A.M. (1995)</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=2618" rel="attachment wp-att-2618"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-2618" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/A._M._Front2-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>I guess Wilco basically evolved out of the band Uncle Tupelo, whom I really know nothing about.  Anyway, most of the members of Wilco had been a part of Uncle Tupelo, and A.M. was kind of seen as sort of a continuation of the alt-country sound of this former band.</p>
<p>A.M. kind of tends to get a bad wrap, since it really doesn&#8217;t show much of the potential for artistic growth that you see on all of the subsequent Wilco releases.  Still, I think you see plenty of promise in Jeff Tweedy&#8217;s songwriting, which has always been at the backbone of Wilco, despite all the different band members that have come and gone throughout the years.  <em>A.M.</em> is pleasant enough, but none of the songs really stand out as being anything more than decent country-infused Stones-esque rock.</p>
<p><strong>Favorite Tracks:</strong> &#8220;I Must Be High&#8221;, &#8220;Box Full Of Letters&#8221;, &#8220;I Thought I Held You&#8221;</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large"><em>Being There (1996)</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=2628" rel="attachment wp-att-2628"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-2628" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Wilco-Being-There1-150x150.gif" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Now here&#8217;s where this band really started to get interesting.  Like any double album, it&#8217;s certainly not perfect, but the sprawling quality of <em>Being There</em> shows the band really starting to hit their stride.  Much of it I think had to do with Tweedy&#8217;s growing confidence as a songwriter, but another part of the equation would have to do with multi-instrumentalist Jay Bennett, who joined the band on this album.</p>
<p>There really is a disparate nature of the songwriting here, as the upbeat numbers on the album are pretty damn upbeat, as songs like &#8220;I Got You (At the End of The Century)&#8221; and &#8220;Outta Sight (Outta Mind)&#8221; have an almost sing-a-long quality to them.  But on the other hand, the slower songs are increasingly dark and introspective.  All the while, you also see the band looking towards new kinds of sonic textures to go along with their signature Americana-infused aesthetic.</p>
<p><strong>Favorite Tracks:</strong> &#8220;Outta Sight (Outta Mind)&#8221;, &#8220;Red-Eyed And Blue&#8221;, &#8220;Was I In Your Dreams&#8221;</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large"><em>Summerteeth (1999)</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.5.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=2631" rel="attachment wp-att-2631"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-2631" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/summerteeth-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Pretty much from that first riff you can tell that Wilco aren&#8217;t really doing that same old alt-country stuff that they were doing on their first two album.  This is an album that uses that classic rock mentality, but infuses it with an interest in sonic noodling as well as a pallette for bigger and bolder sounds.  On top of that, you&#8217;ve got the tuneful Tweedy and the more experimental Bennett really coming together as a true songwriting team to be reckoned with.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a shame that <em>Summerteeth</em> kind of has to live in the shadow of <em>Yankee Hotel Foxtrot</em>, since it really shares some of the best qualities of that album, all while featuring some of Wilco&#8217;s most affecting songs.  Though it&#8217;s not a terribly long album, it still has that sprawling quality that was seen on <em>Being There</em>, as the songs vary from sweepingly orchestral (&#8220;A Shot In The Arm&#8221;) to infectiously rockin&#8217; (&#8220;I&#8217;m Always In Love&#8221;).  Also, you get some of Tweedy&#8217;s darkest lyrical moments, such as &#8220;Via Chicago&#8221;, which begins with the memorable line &#8220;I dreamed of killing you again last night/And it felt alright to me&#8221;.  But most of all you see a small-time band knocking on ambition&#8217;s door, with no intent of holding back.</p>
<p><strong>Favorite Tracks:</strong> &#8220;I Can&#8217;t Stand It&#8221;, &#8220;A Shot In The Arm&#8221;, &#8220;ELT&#8221;</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large"><em>Yankee Hotel Foxtrot (2002)</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/5.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=2634" rel="attachment wp-att-2634"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-2634" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/wilco_yankee_hotel_foxtrot-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>There aren&#8217;t many albums from the last decade that I would give five stars to, but I really have no problem admitting that <em>Yankee Hotel Foxtrot</em> is pretty much a masterpiece.  From start to finish there really isn&#8217;t a bad track, and some of this stems from Tweedy and Bennett&#8217;s masterful songwriting, while some of it also stems from their ability to infuse the songs with a playful unconventionality.  Either way, I think the clashing of Tweedy and Bennett&#8217;s talent as well as personalities is what drives the album, and you can see that by this time the two weren&#8217;t very fond of each other in the documentary <em>I Am Trying To Break Your Heart</em>.</p>
<p>At the time of the album&#8217;s release, much was made of the fact that Wilco&#8217;s record label refused to release <em>Yankee Hotel Foxtrot</em>, and the band was forced to release it independently on the internet.  But as time has gone by, the album&#8217;s quality really speaks for itself despite how much of an impact it had on the way albums would be released in the coming years.  Yet the weird thing about YHF for me is how muted of a musical impact it&#8217;s had since being released.  I like to think that most &#8220;five star&#8221; albums were ones that really changed the direction of music and influenced a lot of other artists, but <em>Yankee Hotel Foxtrot</em> isn&#8217;t really like that.  It really just stands as the work of a band reaching for something bold and ambitious, and pulling it off brilliantly.  Nothing more, nothing less.</p>
<p><strong>Favorite Tracks:</strong> &#8220;Jesus, Etc.&#8221;, &#8220;Heavy Metal Drummer&#8221;, &#8220;Pot Kettle Black&#8221;</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large"><em>A Ghost Is Born (2005)</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=2638" rel="attachment wp-att-2638"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-2638" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/aghostisborn-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>As you can probably tell, I&#8217;m a big fan of what Jay Bennett brought to Wilco, so I&#8217;m not nearly as huge of a fan of the albums Wilco released without the late Mr. Bennett.  <em>A Ghost Is Born</em> was the first album without Bennett, and I think it&#8217;s pretty uneven in comparison to an album as bizarely cohesive as <em>Yankee Hotel Foxtrot</em>.</p>
<p>In place of Jay Bennett&#8217;s lush atmospheric noodling, you had the addition of guitarist Nels Cline, whose guitar work often leads the band towards more jam-like territory.  It&#8217;s a little surprising how well this works on a song like the ten-minute &#8220;Spiders (Kidsmoke)&#8221;, but at other times the guitar interludes seem just kind of tiring.  There are also still some nice piano ballads featured throughout the album, like &#8220;Hell Is Chrome&#8221; or &#8220;Hummingbird&#8221; while there are certainly some experimental moments like &#8220;Less Than You Think&#8221; that are just frustrating, as the song last 15 minutes, 12 of which are basically just white noise.  So you get the idea that Wilco wasn&#8217;t really sure where exactly to take the sound they had laid down in their last few albums, and making a slightly difficult album was the path they chose.</p>
<p><strong>Favorite Tracks:</strong> &#8220;Spiders (Kidsmake)&#8221;, &#8220;Hummingbird&#8221;, &#8220;Handshake Drugs&#8221;</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large"><em>Sky Blue Sky (2007)</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=2639" rel="attachment wp-att-2639"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-2639" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/sky-blue-sky-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Here&#8217;s where Wilco started to get a bit more mellow, not that they haven&#8217;t always maintained a pretty unassuming quality to their music.  But on <em>Sky Blue Sky</em>, you really don&#8217;t get the sense that the band is trying to use the studio in a really innovative way anymore.  And that&#8217;s OK, since <em>Sky Blue Sky</em> relies more on a &#8220;live band&#8221; mentality, with the songs focusing more on the dynamic that exists between the band as they bash out these songs.</p>
<p>Again, you&#8217;ve got Tweedy&#8217;s strong songwriting at the backbone of the band, while Nels Cline seems to find a way of making his guitar a little more suited to the band&#8217;s softer side, as he displays on the sprawling guitar solo of &#8220;Impossible Germany&#8221;.  I&#8217;m sure there are some people that detest the acrobatic nature of Cline&#8217;s guitar playing since it is more showy than your average indie rock guitar playing.  But I think for the most part it adds a nice texture when some of these songs could come off as &#8220;just another laid back Wilco song&#8221;.</p>
<p><strong>Favorite Tracks:</strong> &#8220;Either Way&#8221;, &#8220;Impossible Germany&#8221;, &#8220;Shake It Off&#8221;</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large"><em>Wilco (The Album) (2009)</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=2640" rel="attachment wp-att-2640"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-2640" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/wilco_album-lg-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Though I have no problem admitting that there isn&#8217;t really anything groundbreaking about <em>Wilco (The Album)</em>, I still have kind of a soft spot for it.  Maybe it&#8217;s because it was the first Wilco album I got into after hearing <em>Yankee Hotel Foxtrot</em>, but at the same time I think it is in a way &#8220;a return to form&#8221;, as much as I detest that phrase.</p>
<p>I guess the aspect I like about this album is that for the first time in a while it sounds like these guys are genuinely having fun.  Songs like the album&#8217;s title(ish) track or &#8220;You Never Know&#8221; return the band to the <em>Being There</em> or <em>Summerteeth</em> days, when the band would rip into some country-infused rock boogie.  Then of course you&#8217;ve got some nice ballads that show Jeff Tweedy&#8217;s always reliable introspective side, including the Feist duet &#8220;You And I&#8221;.  Most of all, <em>Wilco (The Album)</em> sounds like a veteran band getting comfortable with themselves and their place in the world of rock music.  I guess we&#8217;ll see if they keep doing this same kind of thing on <em>The Whole Love</em>.</p>
<p><strong>Favorite Tracks:</strong> &#8220;Wilco (The Song)&#8221;, &#8220;You And I&#8221;, &#8220;I&#8217;ll Fight&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2609</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>108</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You Drive Me Crazy</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2580</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2580#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 00:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Drive  Adapted from Jame&#8217;s Sallis&#8217;s 2005 crime novel of the same name Drive was originally planned to be a big budget action flick staring Hugh Jackman, thank god that never happened. Several years later Ryan Gosling became attached to the project and sought out Danish filmmaker Nicolas Winding Refn to direct. I&#8217;d seen Refn&#8217;s last [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large"><em>Drive</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=2583" rel="attachment wp-att-2583"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-2583" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Drive2011Poster2-202x300.jpg" alt="" width="202" height="300" /></a> Adapted from Jame&#8217;s Sallis&#8217;s 2005 crime novel of the same name <em>Drive</em> was originally planned to be a big budget action flick staring Hugh Jackman, thank god that never happened. Several years later Ryan Gosling became attached to the project and sought out Danish filmmaker Nicolas Winding Refn to direct. I&#8217;d seen Refn&#8217;s last two film&#8217;s <em>Bronson</em> and <em>Valhalla Rising</em> and when it was announced he would be taking on the project I knew <em>Drive</em> was a film that had to be seen. For those who aren&#8217;t familiar with Refn&#8217;s work I can definitely tell you that he&#8217;s one to watch. Debuting in the mid 90s with the <em>Pusher</em> crime/thriller trilogy, Refn has already made his mark with some excellent moody films well complimented by inventive cinematography, chilling electronic scores, and subtle yet spectacular performances from his actors. <em>Drive</em> is all those things and maybe more as Refn&#8217;s mainstream debut, though there&#8217;s nothing mainstream about the contents of this dramatic thriller.</p>
<p><em>Drive</em> is simple enough on the surface, Ryan Gosling plays a no-named stuntman who moonlights as a getaway driver for heists. He has little to look forward to in his life but driving until he meets and falls for his neighbor Irene (Carey Mulligan) living with her son while her husband Standard (Oscar Isaac) finishes up a prison sentence. Upon Standard&#8217;s release he&#8217;s introduced to the Driver and rather than feeling threatened he befriends the solemn wheelman. Way over his head in gang related debt, the Driver agrees to help Standard in a heist. Meanwhile the Driver has made dealings organized by his friend and co-worker at a garage Shannon (Bryan Cranston) to race for Bernie Rose (Albert Brooks) a shady film producer surrounded by equally shady individuals such as Jewish gangster Nino (Ron Perlman). The heist eventually goes down but takes a dark turn when Standard is shot dead. Soon after the Driver discovers that Nino was somehow involved with the heist and sends men after the Driver to get the money. It gets a bit messy here there with the story, but with this film it&#8217;s more about the ride than the little details.</p>
<p>In any other hands <em>Drive</em> could have been a very ordinary action thriller, but with Refn it&#8217;s become a very unusual, extraordinary experience. The 80s synth cues are all pitch perfect as Goslin cruises through the dark neo noir-like setting of late night L.A. The violence and action sequences make your skin crawl and keep you teetering on the edge of your seat. The performances are subtle but impressive with Albert Brooks giving my favorite performance. Known in the past for his cynical yet comical L.A. comedian persona this is an Albert Brooks we&#8217;ve never seen before. Gosling plays it simple much in the way Steve McQueen or Clint Eastwood would handle a tough guy role. Gosling spends most of his time giving off intense looks that say more than any words could. Carey Mulligan as one of the premier young actresses today brings a lot to character that may seem underwritten but really has a lot brewing under the surface.</p>
<p>The bottom line is that <em>Drive</em> is a brooding and refreshingly unconventional thriller from a group of very talented people. Gosling has more or less proven himself as one the most interesting leading men working today and director Nicolas Winding Refn has shown that he can still keep his artistic integrity with a widely released film, it&#8217;s an exciting time for the movies.</p>
<p>P.S. If you liked this movie you have to check out Refn&#8217;s film <em>Bronson</em> (currently on Netflix Instant Watch) it&#8217;s really something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2580</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Band of Dudes</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2522</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2522#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2011 07:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gears of War 3 There&#8217;s always been more to the Gears of War franchise lurking under the surface. Sure, the games themselves seemed like mindless macho brosturbation, there were the artsy trailers. There was the fact that the world seemed to have so much lore, but we only saw a little of it. After all, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><em>Gears of War 3</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.5.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=2523" rel="attachment wp-att-2523"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-2523" title="Gears_of_War_3_box_artwork" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Gears_of_War_3_box_artwork-235x300.png" alt="" width="235" height="300" /></a>There&#8217;s always been more to the <em>Gears of War </em>franchise lurking under the surface. Sure, the games themselves seemed like mindless macho brosturbation, there were the artsy trailers. There was the fact that the world seemed to have so much lore, but we only saw a little of it. After all, you play as simple COGs in the massive gears of war. <em>Gears of War 3 </em>finally takes the story where it has always yearned to go, making it one of the most satisfying campaigns of the year. Couple that with one of the most complete multiplayer suites and you&#8217;re in for quite a time.</p>
<p>Times are bad in the <em>Gears </em>universe. The war between humans and locust took a turn when the last city, Jacinto, was sunk, flooding the locust. The remnants of humanity managed to take brief salvation on an island, but their hopes for peace were dashed when the lambent, locust mutated by the planet&#8217;s mysterious fuel imulsion, attacked. With no military or government left, our heroes are now adrift on a helicopter carrier, just trying to survive. So, to recap: the world&#8217;s dying, there&#8217;s a three-way war going on, humanity is fucked.</p>
<p>And it&#8217;s taking a toll on our heroes. Marcus is haunted by regret and remorse about his past. Dom, who has lost his children and wife to this lengthy war, is in a fragile mental state. Cole is going through a mid-life crisis, realizing his days as a professional athlete really are gone. Baird&#8217;s still kind of a dick. Anya&#8217;s on the team now too and just about everyone from the first two games is back to some extent, as are a few newcomers. Most importantly, we&#8217;ve got Jace, played by <em>Friday Night Light&#8217;s </em>Michael B. Jordan and Sam, played by <em>Uncharted 2</em>&#8216;s Claudia Black.</p>
<p><em>Gears of War 3 </em>has a substantial campaign that&#8217;s a real delight to play through. I give a lot of credit sci fi author Karen Traviss, who was able to turn down the bro-isms and find the depth in the characters. My only complaint about the campaign is that it felt a little to padded out with needless sequences. A few too many times I had to go get fuel or go flip a set number of switches, which hurt the games pacing. Notably, there&#8217;s a lengthy detour with a character played by Ice T that is awesome, but adds literally nothing to the story but time. But in the end, the game is fun and I can&#8217;t really complain about getting to play more of it.</p>
<p>The shooting in <em>Gears of War 3</em> is simply the best of any third person shooter. Everything feels just right. There&#8217;s enough of a variety in the campaign enemies to keep you interested and keep your tactics from getting stale. I found hardcore to be the best difficulty for me, it was challenging but never truly frustrating. I played with AI allies, and I imagine it&#8217;s even more fun with three real human coop partners. That&#8217;s right, the game is up to four player coop. I told you, this game has all the multiplayer you could want.</p>
<p>Horde mode, <em>Gears of War 2</em>&#8216;s biggest contribution to gaming, returns with new tower defense mechanics. You can build and upgrade barriers to keep your team safe against the waves of AI enemies. There&#8217;s another, new coop mode too: beast mode. It&#8217;s like reverse horde mode, ala <em>Left 4 Dead</em>. You play as locust beasts, from the lowly tickers all the way up to berserkers, and try to kill a group of AI humans. Beast mode is a neat addition and surprisingly fun to play, give it a shot.</p>
<p>All the versus modes are back, with the addition of a new casual option. This means I can play without just getting mercilessly shotgunned in the back, but I fear I&#8217;ll get kicked out of casual eventually. In the meantime, I&#8217;m having a lot of fun. There are plenty of characters and weapon skins to be unlocked, although there&#8217;s also an absurdly expensive collections of skins you could just buy too. But don&#8217;t do that. It&#8217;s almost as bad as horse armor.</p>
<p>Hands down, <em>Gears of War 3 </em>is the best game in this already stellar franchise. The story is easier to follow, more emotional and gives closure to most (read: not all) of the plot threads. The multiplayer is just about everything I could ask for. Get some friends together and have some fun. If nothing else, enjoy playing the only game in which Ice T rides off into the sunset giving you the finger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2522</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>112</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When Doves Crysis</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=951</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=951#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2011 07:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Crysis 2 It could be easy to forget that the first Crysis was more than just a tool for benchmarking your PC&#8217;s power, it was an interesting FPS that combined Far Cry with aliens and super suits. While I enjoyed the original, it was another computer game that I lost interest in and never finished. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><em>Crysis 2</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=2518" rel="attachment wp-att-2518"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-2518" title="Crysis_2_cover" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Crysis_2_cover-214x300.png" alt="" width="214" height="300" /></a>It could be easy to forget that the first <em>Crysis </em>was more than just a tool for benchmarking your PC&#8217;s power, it was an interesting FPS that combined <em>Far Cry </em>with aliens and super suits. While I enjoyed the original, it was another computer game that I lost interest in and never finished. But I did enjoy it enough to give <em>Crysis 2 </em>a shot when it was made cheaply available to me. And I was happy to find a perfectly competent, pretty game waiting for me. Wait, isn&#8217;t that exactly what I said the first game was more than? Oh bother.</p>
<p><em>Crysis 2 </em>opens with a bang. You&#8217;re Alcatraz, a member of a team of soldiers on a submarine heading to New York City. Because there&#8217;s a war going on between the military, a PMC and aliens. The game doesn&#8217;t do that great a job setting the stage, or really explaining much at all. But your sub sinks and you&#8217;re miraculously saved by Prophet, the squad leader from the original game. He gives Alcatraz the super suit and tasks you with reuniting with his scientist buddy. Things escalate from there.</p>
<p>The entire game takes place in New York City and I really enjoyed the urban setting. It was a great change of pace from the tropical setting of the first game, although the environment doesn&#8217;t substantially change like it did last time. The skyscrapers look great and make quite a spectacle when they come tumbling down. The city streets do make the game much more linear, basically taking you from combat arena to combat arena. You do have options for each battle, which the game makes a point of explicitly telling you, which is a bit weird. You pop up your binoculars and are told &#8220;here is a good place to snipe&#8221; and &#8220;here is a good place to sneak around.&#8221; It&#8217;s a bit weird, but I guess you don&#8217;t have to use the binocs if it really bothers you.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a lot of politics and side switching going on in <em>Crysis 2</em>, and after a while I just started ignoring it. The game never really made me care about what side I was fighting for and I didn&#8217;t really worry about who lived and who died. What I did like about the story was the absolutely brutal beating Alcatraz takes. In most games, the main characters get beaten and shot without showing any wear and tear in the cinematics. In this game, it often takes Alcatraz a while to just get back up after a heavy hit. People look at you like you shouldn&#8217;t be alive. It&#8217;s made explicitly clear that without the suit, you would be dead a hundred times over. That&#8217;s great.</p>
<p>The suit is a bit streamlined compared to <em>Crysis 1 </em>as well. Instead of having a speed or power mode, you automatically use suit power to sprint and jump farther. That just leaves you with stealth and armor, the most useful powers from the first game. Armor lets you take more damage, it&#8217;s pretty self-explanatory. Stealth lets you go all Predator and sneak around, so long as you don&#8217;t run out of power. Both can be upgraded using organic tissue gathered from dead aliens. I found stealth became a little too powerful with upgrades, and I was able to bypass battles if I wanted. But the suit powers elevate the games otherwise standard gameplay. The gun selection is not that interesting, although the ability to customize weapon scopes and add-ons returns. And there are a few alien weapons, although they&#8217;re not that exciting. The shooting is exactly as tight as you would expect it to be.</p>
<p><em>Crysis 2 </em>also includes a more robust multiplayer mode, as it is a first person shooter and therefore must vie for <em>Call of Duty</em>&#8216;s thrown. While the suits do make things a little different, I just didn&#8217;t care about playing this game online. But I guess if you think you&#8217;re really good at the game it could be a fun way to destroy your ego.</p>
<p>Ultimately, <em>Crysis 2 </em>kept me entertained through its campaign. It plays absolutely fine. It looks great, although perhaps not groundbreaking. I played it on PC, but the console version is probably fine. This is totally acceptable entertainment, and suitable for a long weekend. More importantly, if all the games coming out these next few months have captured your attention, it&#8217;s totally fine to put this one on the back burner for a while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=951</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zeptember: Kevin&#8217;s Top Ten</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2525</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2525#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 16:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Ten]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let me begin by stating that anyone who reads this post most likely knows more about Led Zeppelin than I do.  That being said, apparently, no one in the band is actually called Led Zeppelin.  Just some cool name for a band.  Same concept used in Steely Dan, Fleetwood Mac, Kalvin Klein, and Helly Hanson.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=2527" rel="attachment wp-att-2527"><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-2527" title="led_Zeppelin_logo" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/led_Zeppelin_logo-e1316882780872-479x154.png" alt="" width="479" height="154" /></a>Let me begin by stating that anyone who reads this post most likely knows more about Led Zeppelin than I do.  That being said, apparently, no one in the band is actually called Led Zeppelin.  Just some cool name for a band.  Same concept used in Steely Dan, Fleetwood Mac, Kalvin Klein, and Helly Hanson.  Even though I listen to a fair amount of music in the same time that Zeppelin reigned, this band doesn’t receive regular visits from me.  To prepare, I listened to all the albums this band published (ever) over the course of last week, and am glad to say I found a few songs I really enjoyed and several that I recognized.  Though this band didn’t win a place in my top favorite bands, I do greatly respect the bands method of naming albums with band name followed by number in chronological order, making organizing, remembering, and sorting very easy.  Now let it begin, my top 10 Zeppelin’s!</p>
<p><strong>10. Rock and Roll</strong><br />
This song wonderfully represents those that call the genre by the same name home.  The beats, fading of sounds and lyrics all bring me back to a time when music was about enjoying life.  Not today’s garbage that swears and complains about the man holding us down.</p>
<p><strong>9. Stairway to Heaven</strong><br />
Great song, just have heard it way too many times.  Having this song so high up on the list has done enough damage, I will refrain from analyzing it any further.</p>
<p><strong>8. Immigrant Song</strong><br />
Whenever listening to this song I am thinking about Jack Black singing it in “School of Rock,” not sure why because I have heard it in many different settings other than a C movie.  Right when the needle hits the vinyl, I am hooked in.  No stalling or building up just goes straight to full throttle.  Also, has to be one of the coolest chorus’ in a song.</p>
<p><strong>7. All My Love</strong><br />
Not the usual love song, but, the lyrics do indicate some sort of emotion from whoever is the lead singer in this band.  The noises make the song for me; in fact, an instrumental version of this song would probably put it up a few more spots on the list.</p>
<p><strong>6. Misty Mountain Hop</strong><br />
“Packing my bags for the misty mountains where the spirits fly.”  Sounds awesome, count me in!  I have found a new song to listen to when headed up skiing.</p>
<p><strong>5. Ramble On</strong><br />
The starting really reminds me of “Life Less Ordinary,” by Carbon Leaf.  Compared to other Zeppelin songs, this one seems a little mellower, which provides a nice break when only listening to Zeppelin for a week.  Ramble on…</p>
<p><strong>4. D’yer Mak’er</strong><br />
Not much to say other than it works for me.</p>
<p><strong>3. Kashmir</strong><br />
Remember that scene in “Fast Times at Ridgemont High,” when Kashmir is played in the guy’s car?  This song has its own class regarding how to start a song: slow, gradual, hard, Kashmir.  I just love those first 30 seconds and can listen it over and over and over.</p>
<p><strong>2. Fool in the Rain</strong><br />
The rediscovery of “Fool in the Rain,” I would describe as the best outcome from Zeptember.  For those that do not know, I keep a running list on my phone of songs I like that I hear when out and about.  I try to include lyrics, but, mostly it just has words to describe the song, making it difficult to find the name later on.  “Fool in the Rain” has been on the list for a while, and it was nice to stumble upon it Wednesday night.  It doesn’t sound like a Zeppelin song to me, but, it certainly is my favorite.</p>
<p><strong>1. LZ 129 Hindenburg (Luftschiff Zeppelin #129)</strong><br />
This beauty was a true Zeppelin, and had the name way before the band ripped it off.  Born on March 4<sup>th</sup>, 1936, this 800 foot dirigible could take 150 people across the Atlantic at a cruising speed around 90 mph.  She was like nothing else ever built, and remains one of the largest things that ever flew.  Although hydrogen gas is the lightest element on the periodic table, it’s really explosive.  Filling an 800 foot long balloon with explosive gas proved to be a bad idea.  The craft blew up in a spectacular 37 seconds a little over a year after it made its first flight.  Maybe someday these luxury liners of the sky will return, just make sure they are filled with helium.</p>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/?attachment_id=2526" rel="attachment wp-att-2526"><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-2526" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/hindenburg-479x384.jpg" alt="" width="479" height="384" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2525</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>101</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zeptember: Matt&#8217;s Top Ten</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2509</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2509#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 03:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Ten]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Honestly I was never THAT into Zeppelin. I had a little phase in junior high like every kid that likes rock and roll does, but it mostly consisted of my playing my burnt Zeppelin live album that &#8220;the Paine&#8221; gave me over and over and over and over again. In those few months, I was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/no-stairway-demotivational-poster-1236136395.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><p>Honestly I was never THAT into Zeppelin. I had a little phase in junior high like every kid that likes rock and roll does, but it mostly consisted of my playing my burnt Zeppelin live album that &#8220;the Paine&#8221; gave me over and over and over and over again. In those few months, I was ALL about Led Zeppelin. I remember this one specific instance where we were taking my brother to the airport at like eight in the morning and I stuck that CD in the car stereo and everybody was like, &#8220;Do we have to listen to this?&#8221; I was just really confused why no one wanted to rock. It rocks!</p>
<p>My Zeppelin collection is pretty sparse, consisting now of only I, III and IV, so these are just the top 10 that I&#8217;ve enjoyed listening back to over the last week.</p>
<p><strong>10. I Can&#8217;t Quit On You Baby</strong><br />
One thing that really came back to me listening to all these songs again was just how much I miss jamming. More specifically how I miss just playing the drums. This song just grooves like I could never groove. By the time I was done playing this song we&#8217;d be be playing 260 BPM. Plant&#8217;s lyrical rhythms also really add to that as well. Each line is delivered just a little bit later, and that latency just has you sitting on the edge of your seat.</p>
<p><strong><strong>9. Rock &amp; Roll</strong></strong><br />
I&#8217;m not going to try to pick obscure songs to be cool, so this is just one of the great songs that I loved growing up. Since I&#8217;ve been doing a lot of research on recording and how to become a better engineer etc., one of the things I noticed about these recordings is that a lot of the songs are spaced very openly. You can tell it&#8217;s just drums/bass/guitar/ vocals. Except this one. Just a wall of rock.</p>
<p><strong>8. Communication Breakdown</strong><br />
I have a soft spot for the ones we performed obviously. This is one that I was always just exhausted after. My right leg would just be burning by the end of the song because of the constant kick drum, not to mention it was the end of the set usually, so I was just going as nuts as I could possibly go. John Bonham must have calves the size of my waist.</p>
<p><strong>7. Four Sticks</strong><br />
I don&#8217;t even know what John Bonham&#8217;s doing here. Like I sit down and listen to it over and over again. I&#8217;m pretty sure it&#8217;s more than just him playing percussion, but then I tell myself it&#8217;s John Bonham, stop trying to figure out what he&#8217;s doing. It&#8217;s impossible. Just listen.</p>
<p><strong>6. </strong><strong>Black Dog</strong><br />
I never struggled more playing the drums than whenever &#8220;the Paine&#8221; broke out into a jam with this song. I couldn&#8217;t wrap my head around how Bonham played that slow, subdivided groove to a riff with so many notes. Maybe he couldn&#8217;t figure out how to play a faster groove so he just played a &#8220;fuckin&#8217; money beat&#8221;. Maybe he was being teased from another band who had &#8220;label interest.&#8221; Who knows.</p>
<p><strong>5. Misty Mountain Hop</strong><br />
So Plant saw a bunch of hippies in a park, he didn&#8217;t know what time it was, so he stayed a while. Then it got dark. So some homeless guys told him to get in a line. This line was for tea and fun. Then the homeless people told Plant to go in to a deep self-examination. Then he warns people that if they go in the streets, they better open their eyes. Or they might be hit by a car or something. This song is weird. But it rocks.</p>
<p><strong><strong><strong>4. Out on the Tiles</strong></strong></strong><br />
I love unison bass/guitar riffs. Especially when they span odd measures. This is also an example of something Bonham does that I could never do no matter how much I practiced. I had to buy a double bass pedal to be able to play triplets. Bonham just gets drunk and plays them all day long. Maybe I should have been drinking.</p>
<p><strong>3. Immigrant Song</strong><br />
This song was always really disappointing to me, because of how much I didn&#8217;t really enjoy III that much. I started listening to it and was like, &#8220;Yeah this rocks!&#8221; But only to be disappointed by the next 40 minutes and 33 seconds of my life. I&#8217;ve grown to appreciate the album more, but I still am a little disappointed every time I hear it.</p>
<p><strong>2. Good Times Bad Times</strong><br />
<strong>Dun Dun. Dun Dun. Dun Dun. Dun Dun. </strong>Is there really anything else to say. This is really the epitome of Zeppelin. Rockin&#8217; guitar solo, sweet bass fills, in your face and technically intricate drums, and Plant being, well, Plant. One thing I love about this song is the harmonies on the verses. I wish they did more of that.</p>
<p><strong>1. Stairway to Heaven</strong><br />
<strong></strong>You know what? Fuck it. I&#8217;m putting it as my number one because it is. One of my proudest memories of the Defenestrators is how we practiced the shit out of this song for what seemed like months. I loved playing the keyboard flute, and I loved even more coming in with that simple, yet powerful, tom fill (biggest regret is missing that cue, but I couldn&#8217;t hear anything! I swear!) It&#8217;s a shame it&#8217;s so over played, but at the same time that just reiterates how great of a song it really is.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t wait for &#8220;Who knows?&#8221; tomorrow!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2509</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Webcomics!</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2498</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2498#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 16:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good news everyone, I&#8217;ve finally got the webcomics aspect of the site mostly working! This took a while, since I basically had to learn PHP and all sorts of fun backend stuff that most real websites just hire out to professionals. If you didn&#8217;t already know, the main reason we moved from Da Morgue Dot [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/walking-kutcher.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><p>Good news everyone, I&#8217;ve finally got the webcomics aspect of the site mostly working! This took a while, since I basically had to learn PHP and all sorts of fun backend stuff that most real websites just hire out to professionals. If you didn&#8217;t already know, the main reason we moved from Da Morgue Dot Org to here is because John and I wanted to get started on this webcomic. And now we have. Now I just have to keep inking and coloring these babies. For the rest of my life&#8230;</p>
<p>As a bonus, the image you see here is one of two deleted scenes from our inaugural strip. What do you think? Pretty cool, eh? We made that. Now you could make that, I don&#8217;t know, your iPhone wallpaper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2498</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zeptember: Colin&#8217;s Top Ten</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2426</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2426#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 07:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Ten]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From as long as I&#8217;ve been rockin&#8217; I&#8217;ve always loved Led Zeppelin, but for some reason I&#8217;ve never thought of them as one of my all-time favorite musical artists.  I guess the thing that always kept me from truly embracing them was that they always had this God-like status, and you never really got a sense [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/led-zeppelin.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><p>From as long as I&#8217;ve been rockin&#8217; I&#8217;ve always loved Led Zeppelin, but for some reason I&#8217;ve never thought of them as one of my all-time favorite musical artists.  I guess the thing that always kept me from truly embracing them was that they always had this God-like status, and you never really got a sense that their music was very personal.  But then again, when you look at their incredible body of work, thinking of them as gods doesn&#8217;t really seem like the most ridiculous thing in the world.  Anyways, lets get started.</p>
<p><strong>10. Bring It On Home</strong><br />
If you want to get to the heart of Led Zeppelin&#8217;s sound, you&#8217;ve got to start with the blues.  This song starts as a nice little cover of Willie Dixon&#8217;s &#8220;Bring It On Home&#8221; until Jimmy Page&#8217;s subdued strumming gives way to a piercing guitar riff and then it just turns in to all out rock warfare.  And that&#8217;s pretty much the Zeppelin manifesto in a nut shell: taking the blues and making it huge.</p>
<p><strong>9. Out Of The Tiles</strong><br />
There aren&#8217;t too many rockin&#8217; songs on <em>Led Zeppelin III</em>, and that&#8217;s kind of what makes it great.  But on &#8220;Out Of The Tiles&#8221; they really just go for broke, sounding like a chugging locomotive of rock that&#8217;s just on the brink of careening off the tracks.  Sorry, I promise not to make any more bad &#8220;rock&#8221; analogies.</p>
<p><strong>8. Going To California</strong><br />
I felt like I needed to throw in one of Zeppelin&#8217;s folkier numbers, just because it&#8217;s kind of hard not to love it when these guys would sit down with their acoustic instruments and lay down some softer jams. It&#8217;s just a really nice little song about meditating on the roads less traveled, and it&#8217;s a nice break from all the heavy hitters featured on <em>Led Zeppelin IV</em>.</p>
<p><strong>7. What Is And What Should Never Be</strong><br />
Robert Plant has never been a great lyricist, and he definitely shows it on this song with lyrics like &#8220;You will be mine by taking our time&#8221; and &#8220;Baby baby baby baby&#8221;.  But it doesn&#8217;t even matter when you&#8217;ve got such a great jazzy groove supported by John Paul Jones&#8217; lingering bass lines.  And then when Bonham comes in, laying his delicious toms all over Page&#8217;s power chords, it&#8217;s welcome to Rock City: Population You.  Wait, dammit.</p>
<p><strong>6. You&#8217;re Time Is Gonna Come</strong><br />
When you think of Led Zeppelin, they&#8217;re not the kind of band that you expect to just burst in to three part harmonies.  Then again, I guess the swelling chorus of &#8220;You&#8217;re Time Is Gonna Come&#8221; is more like a sing-a-long as Sean pointed out, and a pretty mean-spirited one at that.  Most of all though, the really remarkable thing about this song is it showed that even on their first album, Zeppelin could find ways of sounding huge and anthemic without the aid of an electric guitar.</p>
<p><strong>5. Immigrant Song</strong><br />
The first memory I have of this song was that it was featured in some skate video I bought as a youngster.  One time I was watching it and my mom walked by and she was like, &#8220;Hey, that&#8217;s Led Zeppelin.  Good song.&#8221;  This was a little conflicting, since all I could ask myself was &#8220;How could my mom be into something that sounds so ridiculously badass?&#8221;.  But that&#8217;s the reality of Zeppelin, our parents grew up with them just as much as we did, and somehow that makes sense.</p>
<p><strong>4. Ten Years Gone</strong><br />
When I first started thinking of the songs for this list, &#8220;Ten Years Gone&#8221; was not one that I thought had much hope of making the top ten.  But I&#8217;ve just been listening to it over and over again the last few days and I can&#8217;t seem to get my mind off of it.  It&#8217;s just got this great world-weary quality, as if it was written on the road at the end of a long tour from which there seemed to be no end.  There&#8217;s a whole host of different guitar sounds that Page uses on the track, and it&#8217;s a great example of the way he could use the instrument to convey a whole range of different colors and emotions.</p>
<p><strong>3. Over The Hills And Far Away</strong><br />
So yeah, I really like this song, as do Sean and John.  Maybe we should have vetoed &#8220;Over The Hills And Far Away&#8221; instead of &#8220;Stairway&#8221;, since it might very well be the most irresistible song in Zeppelin&#8217;s discography.  It contains the loud and the quiet, the soft and the heavy, the introspective and the all-encompassing qualities that made up Zeppelin&#8217;s sound, and I&#8217;m glad I was able to take part in a half-way decent cover of it.</p>
<p><strong>2. Ramble On</strong><br />
As you can probably tell, I really like it when Zeppelin songs start out all quiet and mysterious and then just bowls you over with some mindblowing guitar riff.  Well for me, &#8220;Ramble On&#8221;&#8216;s pretty much the king of those kinds of Zeppelin songs, and they do it all while combining the classic bluesman mentality with Lord Of The Rings references.  Go figure.</p>
<p><strong>1. Good Times Bad Times</strong><br />
I hate to reduce Led Zeppelin to one of those bands that peaked on the first song of their first album, but I can&#8217;t help it when the band sounded so damn explosive in this early state.  Really all of the band&#8217;s trademarks are there: Plant&#8217;s unmistakeable howls, Page&#8217;s monster riffs and blues-inflected licks, Jones&#8217;s wandering basslines, and John Bonham giving what is probably my favorite drum part in any song ever.  You put all these elements together and you&#8217;ve got one hell of a stone cold groove, as well as an impressive start to a ridiculously influential career.</p>
<p>Well, that was a lot of fun while it lasted.  Anyways, I&#8217;m just throwing this out there, but how would everybody feel about Whovember?  Just an idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2426</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zeptember: Sean&#8217;s Top Ten</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2408</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2408#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 07:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Ten]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m assuming we&#8217;re all sticking to the &#8220;Stairway to Heaven&#8221; is disqualified rule, even though no one has officially mentioned it. If that is indeed the case, then these are my ten favorite Led Zeppelin songs. It was damn near impossible to narrow it down to these ten, since I had around 50 songs that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/ledzep.jpeg" width="240" />
		</p><p>I&#8217;m assuming we&#8217;re all sticking to the &#8220;Stairway to Heaven&#8221; is disqualified rule, even though no one has officially mentioned it. If that is indeed the case, then these are my ten favorite Led Zeppelin songs. It was damn near impossible to narrow it down to these ten, since I had around 50 songs that I thought were competitive. I had to make some deep cuts and these are the ones that survived, so try at least not to worry about the order they&#8217;re in.</p>
<p><strong>10. All My Love</strong><br />
The song that inspired my recent foray back into Led Zeppelin, it&#8217;s kind of amazing just because it&#8217;s a slow, synth-driven song by Led Zeppelin. That seems weird, doesn&#8217;t it? But that&#8217;s kind of the reality of <em>In Through the Out Door </em>- songs that don&#8217;t quite seem like what Led Zeppelin would be doing. Unlike &#8220;Carouselambra,&#8221; the other great song from that album, &#8220;All My Love&#8221; is exactly the right length to stick with you and somehow also leave you wanting more.</p>
<p><strong>9. Kashmir</strong><br />
Can a song survive on just one great guitar riff? Probably, but &#8220;Kashmir&#8221; is not that song. Because, even though the &#8220;Kashmir&#8221; riff is one of Led Zeppelin&#8217;s most well known, its not just the guitar that makes this great. It&#8217;s one of a handful of songs the band recorded with strings and horns, adding a suitably epic feel to the number. What I really love about it are the lyrics, an aspect of music I don&#8217;t spend much time thinking about. If I had seen &#8220;Kashmir&#8221; written before hearing it, I would have thought it was some quality poetry. Or a crappy poem. I&#8217;m not that great a judge of poetry.</p>
<p><strong>8. Rock and Roll</strong><br />
Legend has it that while frustrated recording the tremendous &#8220;Four Sticks,&#8221; Led Zeppelin accidentally jammed their way into this diddy. Suitably titled, &#8220;Rock and Roll&#8221; draws from the history of the genre and amps it up, making the song among the most rocking I&#8217;ve ever heard. It also the first Led Zeppelin song I heard, or at least remember hearing. I remember listening to it on Colin&#8217;s portable CD player and remarking that I recognized it from a car commercial. That&#8217;s kind of a shitty association, but it got me to where I am today.</p>
<p><strong>7. In My Time of Dying</strong><br />
I&#8217;ve always liked a good slide guitar, and its hard to get it better than Led Zeppelin&#8217;s version of &#8220;In My Time of Dying.&#8221; I wanted to include long songs on my list, since I really do love most of their long songs, even this one, which I believe is their longest. Early this year I heard the Bob Dylan version of this song, which is a totally different, more traditionally blues experience. Led Zeppelin takes the song and jams all over it until nothing&#8217;s left. It&#8217;s pretty amazing. And it ends with coughing and joking. They&#8217;re people too.</p>
<p><strong>6. When the Levee Breaks</strong><br />
Yeah, that&#8217;s right, another blues cover. As John pointed out, the drums and harmonica do this song an amazing favor. The drums are gigantic, it&#8217;s no wonder bands like the Beastie Boys were drawn to sampling them. The reverb or whatever that&#8217;s applied to the harmonica makes it sound different from any other harmonica ever. Let&#8217;s not forget the guitar part, which is no slouch, with plenty of interesting effects piled on top of it as well. And in the middle of it all is Robert Plant, doing his thing as possibly the greatest lead singer in rock. It all comes together on &#8220;When the Levee Breaks.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>5. Good Times Bad Times</strong><br />
This is the first song on the first Led Zeppelin album and I like to keep that in mind when I hear it. I think if I had never heard the band before, if this was something entirely new, it would take me about a minute of &#8220;Good Times Bad Times&#8221;  to declare I will buy ever single album these guys put out. Since we&#8217;re paying tribute to the 31st anniversary of John Bonham&#8217;s death, I would be remiss not to point out that the man played the kick drum and hi hat with just one foot. Listen to the song again. I&#8217;m not a drummer, but that&#8217;s madness!</p>
<p><strong>4. Over the Hills and Far Away</strong><br />
This is kind of like &#8220;Stairway to Heaven&#8221; if it was a little less ambitious and popular. Wow, that sounds much more negative than I meant it.  &#8221;Over the Hills and Far Away&#8221; is one of those songs that makes the world a better place. How about that? It&#8217;s an emotional, beautiful song from the group that&#8217;s considered the inspiration for heavy metal and hard rock. It&#8217;s not just one of my favorite Led Zeppelin songs, it&#8217;s one of my favorite songs.</p>
<p><strong>3. Babe I&#8217;m Gonna Leave You</strong><br />
Ah, time for a gentler little tune. Or is it? &#8220;Babe I&#8217;m Gonna Leave You&#8221; starts gently enough, with a delicate flurry of guitar and then some soft vocals. But at the halfway point, the song explodes. Drums and bass drive the song, the guitar gets heavier and the vocals become screams. This is another song that covers a shorter, simpler tune. In this case, it&#8217;s a Joan Baez song that simply sticks to guitar and vocals. That&#8217;s what makes Led Zeppelin so special. They make it a journey.</p>
<p><strong>2. Ramble On</strong><br />
This is probably the Led Zeppelin that first comes to mind for me&#8230; And a lot of people. The <em>Lord of the Rings </em>references, stupefying guitar and amazing bass and drums all add up to something that no one else ever did or ever will do. I love how the acoustic guitar gives into the electric in this song, it&#8217;s another great example of the kind of journey a quality Led Zeppelin song can take you on.</p>
<p><strong>1. Bron-Y-Aur Stomp</strong><br />
Led Zeppelin does country. I can&#8217;t really explain why I like this so much, or why it&#8217;s easily my most listened to track from the band. Certainly the guitar of Jimmy Page is partly responsible, from the craziness of the intro to the simpler verse, it&#8217;s undeniably great. Certainly John Bonham&#8217;s percussion is a partly responsible, featuring drums you can&#8217;t help but tap along with, as well as spoons and castanets. Certainly John Paul Jones&#8217; bass is partly responsible, since he so beautifully accompanies, nay, matches, the skill on display from the previous two. Certainly Robert Plant&#8217;s vocals are partly responsible, since this is the most sing-a-long Led Zeppelin got this side of &#8220;Your Time is Gonna Come.&#8221; I guess they&#8217;re all responsible. And when you put them together, they can&#8217;t be beat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2408</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zeptember: John&#8217;s Top Ten</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2394</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2394#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Ten]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love to let the led out and I had a blast revisiting one of my favorite artists to make this list, so I hope you have your share of good times reading this post. 10. Boogie with Stu Leave it to Led Zeppelin to take a completely typical blues progression and make it their [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/talent.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><p>I love to let the led out and I had a blast revisiting one of my favorite artists to make this list, so I hope you have your share of good times reading this post.</p>
<p><strong>10. Boogie with Stu</strong><br />
Leave it to <em>Led Zeppelin</em> to take a completely typical blues progression and make it their own. John Bonham&#8217;s drums are repetitive yet infectious with that big echoey sound he was so well known for and guest pianist Ian Stewart wows with the same kind of honky tonk he often brought to <em>Rolling Stones</em> recordings. I also find it interesting that it&#8217;s one of the few recordings to feature Robert Plant on acoustic guitar while Jimmy plucks away on a mandolin, really makes ya wanna boogie!</p>
<p><strong>9. Misty Mountain Hop</strong><br />
I think you&#8217;ll find more than a few of my picks contain some of Bonham&#8217;s biggest beats and this is no exception. Carried by a chunky rhythm and John Paul Jones&#8217; effortlessly cool electric piano it moves along in it&#8217;s own unique and funky <em>Zeppelin</em> style. Naturally Plant impresses with his soaring shrieks and <em>Lord of the Rings</em> lyrics and Page… Well Page is Page, nuff said.</p>
<p><strong>8. The Song Remains the Same</strong><br />
Somehow the first <em>Zeppelin</em> cd I owned was <em>The Best of Zeppelin: Latter Days Vol. 2</em> and seeing that this marks the opening of that compilation it has a special place down in here (points to chest.) It was songs like this where I couldn&#8217;t even begin to wrap my mind around all the different ideas that must&#8217;ve been floating around in Page&#8217;s head. Here we have a song constantly changing tempo, different parts and instrumental breaks and propelled by an army of guitars all individually doing something unique and compelling. The band couldn&#8217;t be any tighter on a song that would be too complex for any non-prog rock band of the time, it&#8217;s really something.</p>
<p><strong>7. Since I&#8217;ve Been Loving You</strong><br />
One of the most powerful blues recordings I can think of. All four members bring so much technical skill to the song but even more passion. Page delivers in my opinion one of his all-time best performances as he more or less solos through the whole seven minutes. Of course Plant delivers one of his iconic, possibly improvised vocal performances and I can&#8217;t get enough of it.</p>
<p><strong>6. Bron-Y-Aur Stomp</strong><br />
Sometimes it&#8217;s the simple things in life that you cherish the most, at least that&#8217;s how I feel about Bonham&#8217;s bass drum. One of Bonham&#8217;s most basic percussion parts makes this song undeniably catchy. On the other side of the spectrum you have Page playing what sounds like a very intricate acoustic guitar part and Plant delivering a greatly executed melody, I just want to sing with them!</p>
<p><strong>5. Trampled Under Foot</strong><br />
I remember when that horrible <em>Finger Eleven</em> song &#8220;Paralyzer&#8221; came out and I said &#8220;It&#8217;s just a ripoff of <em>Take Me Out</em> by <em>Franz Ferdinand</em>.&#8221; Then I remember being reminded of <em>Take Me Out&#8217;s</em> similarity to <em>Trampled Under Foot</em> and then reading that <em>Trampled Under Foot</em> was inspired by a Robert Johnson song. All that aside I like to think it was the <em>Zeppelin</em> rendition that so firmly buried itself in the minds of others who just couldn&#8217;t help but rip it off cause well, it&#8217;s rock bliss. You can thank John Paul Jones for providing the funk with a clavinet performance that could make Stevie Wonder weep and the rest is pure <em>Zeppelin</em>… <em>Finger Eleven</em> really sucks though.</p>
<p><strong>4. Immigrant Song</strong><br />
If the Norse gods ever come down from Valhalla to rock our world this will be their theme. With Plant&#8217;s catchy howls and lyrics about vikings this is an iconic <em>Zeppelin</em> tune built around one of their best riffs. It&#8217;s a song that marches along at a perfect rock pace and one of the songs that would best define the sheer power of the hammer of the gods.</p>
<p><strong>3, Houses of the Holy</strong><br />
Maybe it says something about one&#8217;s affection for a song when they can say they&#8217;re hooked in the first three seconds. At least that&#8217;s how I&#8217;ve always felt about the riff that dominates the song &#8220;Houses of the Holy.&#8221; It&#8217;s so simple and yet so <em>Zeppelin</em> with the distinct sound of the guitar, bass, drums, and vocals. There&#8217;s not much to say, because there really isn&#8217;t much to it, it&#8217;s rock and roll pure and simple.</p>
<p><strong>2. When the Levee Breaks</strong><br />
: I think it&#8217;s apparent at this point that a great Bonham beat is a sure fire way to hook me. In the way of &#8220;Bonham beats&#8221; this has to be one of his best and biggest. I think it&#8217;s Bonham&#8217;s strive for simple, raw, power over complexity that has made him my all-time favorite rock and roll drummer and this is one of my favorite <em>Zeppelin</em> tracks. In addition to this, &#8220;When the Levee Breaks&#8221; also contains some of the most badass harmonica that&#8217;s ever been captured, I mean it sounds like a god damn freight train! Page and Jones drone on with a western style guitar and bass and Plant brings the swagger, an excellent finale to possibly <em>Zeppelin&#8217;s</em> best album.</p>
<p><strong>1. Over the Hills and Far Away</strong><br />
What can I say? It holds such a dear place in my heart after playing and recording it in <em>The Defenestrators</em>. It has that whimsical acoustic first half that eventually launches into a rocking great riff. I heard John Paul Jones interviewed on the radio once where he stated that this was his favorite <em>Zeppelin</em> song to play live and I can completely understand, it&#8217;s such a great example of the group&#8217;s ability to play off of each other. This maybe a Page driven song but it also highlights <em>Zeppelin&#8217;s</em> ability to work together as we all should as passengers of starship Earth.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s tough to dissect one of your favorite bands but I&#8217;m satisfied with my choices. The only song I felt bad about cutting is &#8220;Friends&#8221; one of my favorite examples of &#8220;Experimental Zeppelin&#8221;. If I had to name my favorite <em>Zeppelin</em> album I&#8217;d probably go for the surprising yet honest choice of <em>Led Zeppelin III</em>. It was the first <em>Zeppelin</em> cd I bought after their greatest hits and shows so many sides to the band. It has their acoustic side, their bluesy side, their rock side and everything in between, that&#8217;s the way I like my music.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2394</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>108</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Welcome To Zeptember</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2381</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2381#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 00:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With summer finally behind us, it&#8217;s about time we actually start posting on a semi-regular basis, and what better way to lead us into that than a theme week followed by the post orgy that is Shocktober.  This year our theme of choice is that of the mighty Led Zeppelin, a band that we all [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Zeptember.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-2382" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Zeptember-300x144.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="144" /></a>With summer finally behind us, it&#8217;s about time we actually start posting on a semi-regular basis, and what better way to lead us into that than a theme week followed by the post orgy that is Shocktober.  This year our theme of choice is that of the mighty Led Zeppelin, a band that we all hold pretty near and dear to our hearts.  Unlike Beatles week we don&#8217;t really have something as awesome as Beatles Rock Band to do it on honor of (though we can keep hoping for Zeppelin Rock Band).  But hey, Zeptember&#8217;s a pretty cool name, even if it&#8217;s not completely original, and I can&#8217;t wait to see what everybody&#8217;s favorite Zeppelin songs are.</p>
<p>So this is how I think this whole thing should work out:</p>
<ul>
<li>Tuesday: John&#8217;s Top Ten Led Zeppelin Songs</li>
<li>Wednesday: Sean&#8217;s Top Ten</li>
<li>Thursday: Mine</li>
<li>Friday: Nancy&#8217;s</li>
<li>Saturday: Who Knows!</li>
</ul>
<div>Maybe Kevin can figure out something to do, though I&#8217;m not sure Kevin knows what a Led Zeppelin is.</div>
<div>I wish I could think of a Led Zeppelin pun to end this on, but not that many of their lyrics are very memorable.  So, uh, let&#8217;s hope our songs don&#8217;t remain the same.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2381</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;That&#8217;s not very scary. More like a six-foot Turkey.&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2362</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2362#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 21:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kasabian &#8211; Velociraptor! Just two years since their last release and Brit-electro rockers Kasabaian are at it again, whatever &#8220;it&#8221; is supposed to be. In the past Kasabian has delivered plentiful portions of danceable and hard rock tunes but have seemed to mellow on Velociraptor. No, I don&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s an album of ballads or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Kasabian &#8211; <em>Velociraptor!</em></span></td>
<td width="150"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/2.5.png" alt="" border="0" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/kasabian_VELOCIRAPTOR1.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-2368" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/kasabian_VELOCIRAPTOR1-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="170" height="170" /></a>Just two years since their last release and Brit-electro rockers <em>Kasabaian</em> are at it again, whatever &#8220;it&#8221; is supposed to be. In the past <em>Kasabian</em> has delivered plentiful portions of danceable and hard rock tunes but have seemed to mellow on <em>Velociraptor</em>. No, I don&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s an album of ballads or anything, it&#8217;s still rock music that moves at a moderate pace but there doesn&#8217;t seem to be much spark here. Past <em>Kasabian</em> songs like; &#8220;Club Foot&#8221;, &#8220;Processed Beats&#8221;, &#8220;Shoot the Runner&#8221;, even &#8220;Vlad the Impaler&#8221; from the last album all had an edge to them whether it was more hard rock or hip hop inspired. Songs on <em>Velociraptor</em> feel like they were crapped out too fast, I mean you can put as much lush production on a song as you want, but make sure you have a good song to start with.</p>
<p><em>Kasabian</em> thus far have appeared to be one of those bands that the critics love to hate. It doesn&#8217;t help that <em>Kasabian</em> has always seemed to exude a certain arrogance, possibly rubbed off on them by repeated touring with <em>Oasis</em>. They think they&#8217;re hot shit but have never really had the material to back that reputation up. Despite what anyone says I think &#8220;Club Foot&#8221; is a classic but they haven&#8217;t had as much breakthrough success since then. I enjoyed the last three <em>Kasabian</em> albums because the songs usually had a little grit behind their polished pop appearances, this album is just too squeaky clean.</p>
<p>In the past I&#8217;ve been too easy on laziness when it comes to artists I like, so I&#8217;m taking a stand. <em>Kasabian</em> should always WAIT until they have the best songs before making an album. I don&#8217;t care if it takes four years, I think this album came out too fast. Some songs are okay, the title track for instance (even if it is a bit of a ripoff of <em>The Vines</em> &#8220;Get Free&#8221; and <em>Shocking Blue&#8217;s</em> &#8220;Love Buzz&#8221; famously covered by <em>Nirvana</em>). The track &#8220;Switchblade Smiles&#8221; is probably the closest to the kind of <em>Kasabian</em> song I want to hear, gotta have that edge! I still think <em>Kasabian</em> can turn it around but next time they should probably look before they leap.</p>
<p><strong>Favorite Tracks:</strong> &#8220;Switchblade Smiles&#8221;, &#8220;Velociraptor&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2362</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s a Good Time to be Pissed at Nintendo</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2313</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2313#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 06:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/?p=2313</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This monstrosity is the Nintendo 3DS Slide Pad add-on. It&#8217;s probably the biggest news out of TGS, even though Nintendo announced it before the event and pictures were leaked out before that. If you&#8217;ve never seen a 3DS before and you&#8217;re wondering why it looks so bulky and lopsided, let me tell you what&#8217;s new. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/3ds-circle-pad.jpeg" width="240" />
		</p><p>This monstrosity is the Nintendo 3DS Slide Pad add-on. It&#8217;s probably the biggest news out of TGS, even though Nintendo announced it before the event and pictures were leaked out before that. If you&#8217;ve never seen a 3DS before and you&#8217;re wondering why it looks so bulky and lopsided, let me tell you what&#8217;s new. The Slide Pad add-on grips onto your 3DS, surrounding your previously sleek system&#8217;s lower half, adding new shoulder buttons and, notably, a second circle pad. Never mind that it laughs at symmetry and aesthetics, new buttons!</p>
<p>When I first saw this thing, I was flustered, but I took solace in knowing that its announcement was in conjunction with the new, 3DS-exclusive <em>Monster Hunter</em> game. That franchise is massive in Japan, it turned the PSP into a success over there. So I could understand Nintendo bending over backwards to secure what could become its new console&#8217;s biggest hit. But, when Nintendo showed the Slide Pad off at its pre-TGS show, it confirmed that the add-on will be used by multiple upcoming games. And the news just got worse from there.</p>
<p>Probably the most remarkably terrible thing about the Slide Pad is that it takes a battery. You&#8217;d think with something stupid like this, they could at least build additional battery power into the device, helping to overcome the 3DS&#8217; most obvious flaw. But no, Nintendo expects me to find a freakin&#8217; AAA battery for it. And I can&#8217;t use my sweet 3DS dock with this monstrosity either. Boo!</p>
<p>More importantly, the Slide Pad goes against the concept of the 3DS. It doesn&#8217;t need a second analogue stick because it has the touch screen. Every single DS game compensated for that, and that limitation made DS games unique and popular. With a second analogue stick, developers don&#8217;t necessarily need to use touch anymore. What does that leave us with? A less powerful PlayStation Vita with headache power.</p>
<p>But as someone who bought the 3DS after Nintendo dropped its price, I feel betrayed. When I bought the system, I knew battery power was an issue and I knew a new iteration of the system was inevitable. I accepted that. Now my handheld has to either become an abomination or incompatible with the future of its software lineup. Now when they come out with a new 3DS revision, which they haven&#8217;t announced but you know is coming, it will essentially be a relaunch of the system. As a consumer, I have never felt so completely fucked over by a company that I previously trusted. I can think of no other peripheral in gaming history that is as damning as the 3DS Slide Pad. So I&#8217;m pretty pissed. Nintendo&#8217;s going to have to come up with something pretty extraordinary to make this 3DS Ambassador come back home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2313</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>192</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sort of Sweet Child of Mine</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=950</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=950#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 08:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=950</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Child of Eden Child of Eden was clearly designed to be played with the Kinect. Since I don&#8217;t have one, I don&#8217;t know what I&#8217;m doing reviewing this game. When you factor in that I enjoyed, but didn&#8217;t necessarily love,&#160;Child of Eden&#8216;s spiritual predecessor, Rez, I feel hardly qualified to talk about this game, nonetheless [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><i>Child of Eden</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-O46-noIfv1M/Tl8dguSi0GI/AAAAAAAABGM/OZ-CyjVnBlY/s1600/Child_of_Eden.jpeg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-O46-noIfv1M/Tl8dguSi0GI/AAAAAAAABGM/OZ-CyjVnBlY/s200/Child_of_Eden.jpeg" width="169" /></a></div>
<p><i>Child of Eden </i>was clearly designed to be played with the Kinect. Since I don&#8217;t have one, I don&#8217;t know what I&#8217;m doing reviewing this game. When you factor in that I enjoyed, but didn&#8217;t necessarily love,&nbsp;<i>Child of Eden</i>&#8216;s spiritual predecessor, <i>Rez</i>, I feel hardly qualified to talk about this game, nonetheless critique it.&nbsp;But here we are. And while I&#8217;ve always considered myself the type who backs away from a challenge, this one seems doable.</p>
<p>So it&#8217;s the future. Mankind has moved on out into deep space. The first person born in space, Lumi, had her&nbsp;consciousness&nbsp;transferred&nbsp;into the future Internet when she died. Now she&#8217;s come under attack by viruses or something and it&#8217;s up to you to save her. Even though she&#8217;s already dead. Information is important, damnit!</p>
<p>Of course the story doesn&#8217;t really matter that much, it&#8217;s merely an excuse for you to travel through some genuinely beautiful and trippy visuals. Like <i>Rez</i>,<i> Child of Eden</i> delivers a synesthetic experience that no other form of entertainment can match. It&#8217;s like a more beautiful, interactive Pink Floyd lazer light show. As important to the experience as the visuals is the music, which walks the thin line between techno and trance. Each song drives its level and you&#8217;ll have to attack with the rhythm of the music to get a high score.</p>
<p>Oh what&#8217;s that? You&#8217;d like to know how this game plays? Fair enough. It&#8217;s a sort of on-rails shooter. You can attack in two ways: a lock on attack and a rapid fire blast. Most enemies are best defeated with lock on, but every once in a while you&#8217;ll encounter an armored enemy who must be blasted down. More importantly, you&#8217;re rapid fire shots can take down incoming enemy fire. You also have bombs. Moving along&#8230;</p>
<p>Actually, I guess that&#8217;s enough. <i>Child of Eden </i>is a prettier, Kinect-enabled <i>Rez</i>. It&#8217;s five levels long, and each of those will take you about 10 minutes to beat. The game lengthens itself by demanding you repeat levels to unlock the next one, which would be more annoying if the game wasn&#8217;t so zen-like to begin with. My biggest complaint was the lack of checkpoints, when you die you&#8217;re booted all the way back to the main menu. That really sucked when I died toward the end of the last, and longest, level in the game. I get the feeling that with Kinect, <i>Child of Eden </i>could really be something. Playing it with just a controller, well, it was <i>something</i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=950</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>100</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hump De Bumbershoot</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=949</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=949#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 19:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last year was my first outing at Bumbershoot; the northwest&#8217;s premier music festival, at least last year it was. Last year the headliner was none other than music legend Bob &#8220;Motherfucking&#8221; Dylan and along with Neko Case and The Decemberists it was an event not to be missed. So how could they top that? Well [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-u_ijh-yn8x4/TmnT1ThTKPI/AAAAAAAACF0/xCePcfSDQAk/s1600/bumbershoot_2011_pusa.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 100px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-u_ijh-yn8x4/TmnT1ThTKPI/AAAAAAAACF0/xCePcfSDQAk/s400/bumbershoot_2011_pusa.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5650280120239466738" /></a><br />Last year was my first outing at Bumbershoot; the northwest&#8217;s premier music festival, at least last year it was. Last year the headliner was none other than music legend Bob &#8220;Motherfucking&#8221; Dylan and along with Neko Case and <i>The Decemberists</i> it was an event not to be missed. So how could they top that? Well since they probably couldn&#8217;t they went in a completely different direction, bands that aren&#8217;t as famous or good. Okay I&#8217;m getting a little carried away here, this year wasn&#8217;t bad, but it&#8217;s hard to get excited when you&#8217;re only there to see <i>Hall and Oates</i>. As much as I love the cheesy pop music of Daryl Hall and John Oates I was shocked to find they could still headline a festival like this, does that mean they&#8217;re as good as Bob Dylan? Seems like they should be playing the Emerald Queen Casino but here they were and I saw them and ya know what? It was still fun, I guess it&#8217;s more about the entire experience than anything else.</p>
<p>My Bumbershoot odyssey began this year as I was jusr crossing the bridge into the emerald city and got a phone call. My step dad called and me and asked &#8220;Hey John, is it too late for your mom to come?&#8221; You see at this point I was going to Bumbershoot by myself but my mom had showed some interest earlier, so even though it meant turning around right before my early arrival I turned back and she joined me. This gave me a good opportunity to use a deal I had where I could bring a guest for half price of the original ticket, I&#8217;ll take it!</p>
<p>We finally made it to Bumbershoot at about 2:00 and spent the first half hour or so getting some grub and getting a feel for the festival. The first performance we caught was <i>Head Like a Kite</i> a semi electronic group featuring a vocalist jumping around and shouting and a drummer laying down the beats. They were basically the definition of okay, though I enjoyed this other guy in the panda suit on stage (he knew how to work an audience,) Afterwards we continued to wander until we found a fried candy stand. So many times I&#8217;d heard about fried candy but never seen it readily available, still full from lunch I decided I&#8217;d be back later but my mom got some fried pickles. Actually they weren&#8217;t half bad, just imagine a pretty good pickle in a fish n&#8217; chips-like batter with tartar, sounds gross but America has spoken.</p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-ajjNEeg10qA/TmnSnzGavOI/AAAAAAAACFA/t3KdkvYIV74/s1600/mediaManager-3.jpeg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 217px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-ajjNEeg10qA/TmnSnzGavOI/AAAAAAAACFA/t3KdkvYIV74/s320/mediaManager-3.jpeg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5650278788686855394" /></a><br />By 3:00 I was on my way to check out Big Boi in the Key Arena, my mom just ordering the pickles minutes before would wait outside and checkout some other group. So I walked into the Key Arena to the sound of a booming bass and lyrics being spit out faster than the Flash on laundry day. I&#8217;ve heard good things about Big Boi&#8217;s solo music but not being much of a hip hop fan I didn&#8217;t really know what was going on. Though after a few songs I actually started to get into it, Big Boi along with his co-vocalist, DJ, and drummer did a nice job of getting the audience pumped up always addressing us as &#8220;Yo Motherfucking Seattle!&#8221;. The house really got into it when ever he delved into <i>Outkast&#8217;s</i> back catalog to dust off an old hit. These included; &#8220;Ms, Jackson&#8221;, &#8220;I Like the Way You Move&#8221; and my favorite &#8220;B.O.B&#8221; I can&#8217;t believe a person can even speak that quickly.</p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-_oLarhStHiA/TmnTGGG97wI/AAAAAAAACFI/aBIVWTVHcJk/s1600/Big-Boi_05.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 214px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-_oLarhStHiA/TmnTGGG97wI/AAAAAAAACFI/aBIVWTVHcJk/s320/Big-Boi_05.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5650279309185511170" /></a><br />Afterwards I caught up with my mom near some band named <i>YACHT</i>, kind of a <i>B-52</i> sounding band, a cute sound I guess. At this point we made our way to the main outdoor stage where some guy, I wanna say Dennis? Was playing funk music, we watched for a few minutes until we decided to check out the beer garden. Inside the garden we both got some Chardonnay that aside from a hint of grape had a fairly disgusting flavor. Bored with the endless jamming of Dennis whatever we decided to wander encountering a delightful street juggler. I&#8217;ve always loved street magicians and jugglers so I had to check this out and even though he wasn&#8217;t the greatest juggler in the world he was a very finely tuned comedic showman. After this I checked soul singer Charles Bradley for a little bit, he was a great singer but I wasn&#8217;t really digging his tunes, whatever.</p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-bwYzZ4vfLpY/TmnTNzZQmmI/AAAAAAAACFU/0LAL4EVbuhE/s1600/mediaManager-1.jpeg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 215px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-bwYzZ4vfLpY/TmnTNzZQmmI/AAAAAAAACFU/0LAL4EVbuhE/s320/mediaManager-1.jpeg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5650279441600911970" /></a><br />A few hours and a fried candy bar later we made our way to Key Arena to see <i>Fitz and the Tantrums</i> and then later <i>Hall and Oates</i>. I&#8217;d heard of <i>Fitz</i> awhile back and had actually heard the group&#8217;s album beforehand so I was well prepared for their R&amp;B laced set. The performance was well polished but some of their songs are definitely better than others. Some of their songs just seem to derivative of preexisting soul songs, but overall it was entertaining, I definitely enjoyed their cover of <i>The Raconteurs</i> &#8220;Steady as She Goes&#8221; and of course the playing of their infectiously catchy hit song&#8221;Moneygrabber.&#8221;</p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-i4iQZIiKBao/TmnTUDcv7XI/AAAAAAAACFc/aMdgSHaNAPg/s1600/Fitz-and-the-Tantrums-KEXP_01.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 214px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-i4iQZIiKBao/TmnTUDcv7XI/AAAAAAAACFc/aMdgSHaNAPg/s320/Fitz-and-the-Tantrums-KEXP_01.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5650279548989730162" /></a><br />About twenty minutes later the long awaited sunday headliners finally took the stage to a fairly full Key Arena. They opened with a slightly altered version of &#8220;Maneater&#8221; that excellently showcased Daryl Hall&#8217;s still marvelous vocal abilities. Oh yeah, Oates was okay too, damn he sure is short though. Most of the songs were enjoyable enough but too many contained cheesy jamming sections that really drew the show out longer than it needed to be. I&#8217;d looked online a few days earlier to find that they&#8217;ve been playing the same set list for awhile now, it definitely seemed over rehearsed, it&#8217;s gotta be fresh every time man! Though I was disappointed by the changes made to classics like &#8220;I Can&#8217;t Go for That&#8221; and &#8220;Rich Girl&#8221; now with a bluesy piano opening, I still enjoyed seeing these talented musicians show off their chops. &#8220;You Make My Dreams&#8221; was easily the highlight of the night being one of the few songs played exactly as we all know it and &#8220;Private Eyes&#8221; was a great closer, there&#8217;s something very satisfying about seeing that many people perform the clapping in the chorus.</p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-uDy9LyKoGi8/TmnTci3l1kI/AAAAAAAACFk/7TTiVDs8aOo/s1600/bumbershoo-hall-and-oates-josh-trujillo.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 216px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-uDy9LyKoGi8/TmnTci3l1kI/AAAAAAAACFk/7TTiVDs8aOo/s320/bumbershoo-hall-and-oates-josh-trujillo.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5650279694862767682" /></a><br />Seeing that this review is already irrelevant and the fact that I lost interest two paragraphs in probably means I should wrap it up. So in conclusion not a great Bumbershoot but an interesting one. I can&#8217;t wait to see who will headline next year… <i>Seals &amp; Crofts</i>? That would suck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=949</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>C.A.T: The Smiths</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=948</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=948#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 20:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Smiths &#8211; The Smiths (1984) What a tragedy of almost Shakesperian caliber when a classic album segment has to be phoned in, especially to such a talented group. Colin is really the blog&#8217;s resident Smiths fan so my outlook comes from more of a casual observer. I listen to the Smiths every now and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">The Smiths &#8211; <em>The Smiths (1984)</em></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-IKC7YYhwNmA/TmfI0Lo3raI/AAAAAAAACEo/CU6CvSMw50k/s1600/1984-the-smiths.jpg"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5649705056362540450" style="float: left; margin: 0 10px 10px 0; cursor: hand; width: 200px; height: 200px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-IKC7YYhwNmA/TmfI0Lo3raI/AAAAAAAACEo/CU6CvSMw50k/s200/1984-the-smiths.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a>What a tragedy of almost Shakesperian caliber when a classic album segment has to be phoned in, especially to such a talented group. Colin is really the blog&#8217;s resident <em>Smiths</em> fan so my outlook comes from more of a casual observer. I listen to the <em>Smiths</em> every now and then though my knowledge of the group is limited. I first heard this album a few years ago and it&#8217;s still stuck with me today, at least anytime I&#8217;m in the moody for moody alt-dream pop.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s the first first question indeed, what genre would you categorize the <em>Smiths</em> as? With Morrissey&#8217;s unique tortured pop poet persona and Johnny Marr&#8217;s diverse guitar playing, they crafted a sound that stands alone from other bands of the time. It always amazes me when you can get a band from the 80s who haven&#8217;t become dated from the decade of drum machines and synths, these guys were just off doing their own thing. Even on their first album <em>The Smiths</em> leisurely seem to move to the beat of their own drum playing morose yet beautiful ballads with more uptempo pop songs.</p>
<p>Even after how ever many years I have trouble separating the individual tracks in my mind. I can usually remember &#8220;Reel Around the Fountain&#8221; and of course the American version of the album which includes the classic &#8220;This Charming Man&#8221; a track I&#8217;ve always had great affection for. Really I just enjoy the overall sound and how each track seems to effortlessly sway into the next creating a lush texture held together with great pop songs. Someday i&#8217;ll find my way into listening to more of <em>The Smiths</em> music when I&#8217;m ready and that&#8217;ll be a good day.</p>
<p><strong>Favorite Tracks:</strong> &#8220;Reel Around the Fountain&#8221;, &#8220;Still Ill&#8221; &#8220;This Charming Man&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=948</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Bewitching Game</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=947</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=947#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 05:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=947</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Witcher 2: Assassins of Kings I was a little nervous going into The Witcher 2. The first game didn&#8217;t seem as fun to me as everyone else seemed to think it was and I never got that far into it. Like the Elder Scrolls and Fallout franchises, I just didn&#8217;t see what they saw [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><i>The Witcher 2: Assassins of Kings</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.5.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Dsl5eoavJU4/TlY9Bl-ObfI/AAAAAAAABGI/HP-vJMO4pl0/s1600/Witcher_2_cover.jpeg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Dsl5eoavJU4/TlY9Bl-ObfI/AAAAAAAABGI/HP-vJMO4pl0/s200/Witcher_2_cover.jpeg" width="141" /></a></div>
<p>I was a little nervous going into <i>The Witcher 2</i>. The first game didn&#8217;t seem as fun to me as everyone else seemed to think it was and I never got that far into it. Like the <i>Elder Scrolls </i>and <i>Fallout </i>franchises, I just didn&#8217;t see what they saw in the game. But I could tell that it wasn&#8217;t bad and <i>The Witcher 2 </i>came out right when I graduated from college, so I took a leap of faith. I&#8217;m glad I did, because I can say,&nbsp;unequivocally, that this is the best game that is a sequel to a game I didn&#8217;t play that much of and is also based on a popular series of books I never read. And that&#8217;s something.</p>
<p>Geralt of Rivia, the witcher you heard so much about, begins <i>Assassins of Kings </i>locked in the dungeons. This isn&#8217;t uncommon for him, since witchers are humans that mutated themselves to become monster hunters. There is a lot of racial tension in this world, with plenty of humans taking a strong anti-elf and dwarf stance. Since Geralt isn&#8217;t quite human, he&#8217;s an outsider. But more importantly, he&#8217;s been accused to killing the king. The game catches you up a little bit and then Geralt is off on a quest to clear his name, one way or another.</p>
<p>The structure of <i>The Witcher 2</i> is simple enough, each chapter you have a hub town where you can accept quests and explore. There&#8217;s plenty to do in this game, especially if you choose to replay it. At a certain point you&#8217;re forced to choose between two paths, and the entire game is different from that point. What I liked about that choice, and many of the choices Geralt makes, is that it wasn&#8217;t a clear good or evil decision. In this world, everyone&#8217;s a jerk and you can never be sure exactly who you should side with, since they might betray you as soon as they&#8217;re done using you. It makes the story a lot more engaging than I expected, especially since I came in with practically no lore knowledge.</p>
<p>This is a game that embraces newcomers, while dropping in enough to give returning fans a kick. When Geralt meets up with characters I assume were in the last game or the books,&nbsp;conversations&nbsp;never get too referential, just enough that even I can understand their relationship. I get that Triss is a love interest and Dandlion is a wannabe loverboy without having to have them explained to me. It&#8217;s good writing and that&#8217;s something I can appreciate.</p>
<p><i>Assassins of Kings </i>takes a bit of time to learn to play, which isn&#8217;t helped by the game&#8217;s general lack of tutorials. The first sequence you&#8217;ll play through is somewhat demanding for new players, and the game doesn&#8217;t help you out. I found the controls a little floatier than I would have desired and lacking in basic functionality and customizability. I ended up playing most of the game with an Xbox controller, which seemed better in some aspects, such as the inclusion of a &#8220;loot all&#8221; button, something keyboard controls are missing.</p>
<p>This can be quite a difficult game, if you let it. To do well in battle, you&#8217;ll have to carefully plan ahead, setting traps and drinking potions to increase your combat ability. Swordplay is simplified to just heavy and quick attacks, forgoing the styles and timing mechanics from the last game. Leveling is a bit more straightforward too, and I made myself quite a beast, making most battles fairly simple by the end of the game. Then again, I played on normal. Maybe I should have adjusted the difficulty when things got too easy.</p>
<p>But I was never not enjoying <i>The Witcher 2</i>. This a great RPG that does everything you could ask of the genre. It engages you with the story, puts a premium on player choice and gives plenty of motivation to explore and quest. That&#8217;s about everything I&#8217;m looking for. In fact, I better start a new campaign pretty soon, I want to see more of the alternate path.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=947</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>102</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>C.A.T.: Murmur</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=946</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=946#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 04:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[R.E.M. &#8211; Murmur (1983) OK, so I guess I could keep the whole debut album trend going for at least one more week. &#160;And since my summer basically comes to an end this week, I guess it&#8217;s kind of fitting that I do an R.E.M. album, since I spent much of the summer getting deeper [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="100%"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">R.E.M. &#8211; <i>Murmur </i>(1983)</span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-qwp0saoctb4/Tl23AeIGawI/AAAAAAAABAc/r3rzL-GSrB4/s1600/rem-murmur.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-qwp0saoctb4/Tl23AeIGawI/AAAAAAAABAc/r3rzL-GSrB4/s200/rem-murmur.jpg" width="197" /></a></div>
<p>OK, so I guess I could keep the whole debut album trend going for at least one more week. &nbsp;And since my summer basically comes to an end this week, I guess it&#8217;s kind of fitting that I do an R.E.M. album, since I spent much of the summer getting deeper into these pioneers of alternative rock. &nbsp;Plus, I think they deserve a better CAT than Sean&#8217;s <a href="http://www.damorgue.org/2009/03/cat-out-of-time.html">weak attempt</a>.</p>
<p>I guess what makes <i>Murmur</i> such an arresting collection of songs is that it shows the band&#8217;s signature sound already fully-realized in a way that wasn&#8217;t quite like anything going on in the world of underground or mainstream music. &nbsp;You&#8217;ve got Peter Buck&#8217;s jangly guitars, Michael Stipe&#8217;s somewhat unintelligable but nonetheless impassioned vocals, and then you&#8217;ve got the melodic basslines and soaring back-up vocals from Mike Mills. &nbsp;These are really the core elements that have stayed at the backbone of R.E.M.&#8217;s sound for decades, and though they&#8217;ve certainly taken this sound in different directions, you can see on <i>Murmur</i> that they had already stumbled on to something special.</p>
<p>I guess I tend to look at R.E.M. as a band that were sort of a fusion of a lot of the best music that was happening in American rock&#8217;s underground from bands like The Feelies and The dB&#8217;s in the early &#8217;80s. &nbsp;However, I think R.E.M. was able to finally achieve mainstream success because for one they stayed together and developed their sound more than those bands, but also because there was undeniable respect for classic pop songwriting in their music. &nbsp;You can see this in the Byrds-y jangle of songs like &#8220;Catapult&#8221; or &#8220;Sitting Still&#8221;, while you can also see R.E.M.&#8217;s interest in tender piano ballads, the likes of which would continue to be a big part of their repertoire for years to come.</p>
<p>Honestly, I always feel silly talking about an album that&#8217;s as heralded and influential as <i>Murmur</i>, but I guess that just speaks to the importance of the album. &nbsp;And after going deeper into R.E.M.&#8217;s discography this summer, I can say that they&#8217;ve put out quite a lot of good music, but I don&#8217;t think think they&#8217;ve ever sounded better than on this debut.</p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;Radio Free Europe&#8221;, &#8220;Moral Kiosk&#8221;, &#8220;Catapult&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=946</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>105</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legacy of Lame</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=945</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=945#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 19:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dragon Age II &#8211; Legacy It seems that I was in the minority when I came out in favor of Dragon Age II. The game suffered from a lack of scope, to be sure, but I had fun playing it. The first major DLC for the game was a weapon pack, which probably wasn&#8217;t the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="100%"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><i>Dragon Age II &#8211; Legacy</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-QdLKx4WBNHU/TlSEvzAvcVI/AAAAAAAABGA/2fI7bE9EXFU/s1600/Banner.png"><img border="0" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-QdLKx4WBNHU/TlSEvzAvcVI/AAAAAAAABGA/2fI7bE9EXFU/s1600/Banner.png" width="430" /></a></div>
<p>It seems that I was in the minority when I came out in favor of <i>Dragon Age II</i>. The game suffered from a lack of scope, to be sure, but I had fun playing it. The first major DLC for the game was a weapon pack, which probably wasn&#8217;t the best strategic move for a game criticized for being a money-grab. Now another weapon pack is coming out, which seems like a really bad idea. But sandwiched between those two item collections came the <i>Legacy </i>DLC, an additional quest that added a bit to the main game&#8217;s lore and tried to address the chief complaints leveled against <i>Dragon Age II</i>.</p>
<p><i>Legacy </i>immediately takes you two a new locale, as if Bioware was trying to apologize for not coming up with enough new settings. Hawke and company track down the dwarven&nbsp;cartel&nbsp;that has been trying to kill them and demand answers. What they get is violent&nbsp;resistance, and a new dungeon to explore; a dungeon that contains some dark secrets and an ancient evil. While it&#8217;s an admirable effort to make the game&#8217;s locations more diverse, an underground dungeon isn&#8217;t that much to look at, making the effort appreciated, but pretty much wasted.</p>
<p>The chief complaint against the combat in <i>Dragon Age II </i>was enemies appearing out of nowhere mid-fight, which as far as I could tell was not an issue in <i>Legacy</i>. The stakes of every battle seemed obvious from the get-go, with all enemies and traps clearly obvious. <i>Legacy </i>introduces a few new enemy types as well, some of whom return from <i>Dragon Age Origins</i>. My only real combat-related complaint is the final boss battle, which relies heavily on your three AI-controlled allies being able to not stand in the fire, a skill that many real life <i>World of Warcraft </i>players still don&#8217;t have. As a result, the final battle can either seem unfairly difficult or unusually tedious, depending on the difficulty you&#8217;re playing on.</p>
<p>All in all, while it&#8217;s not <i>Lair of the Shadow Broker</i>, I think this is a solid piece of DLC for a solid game. It won&#8217;t redeem it for anyone who didn&#8217;t like <i>Dragon Age II </i>to begin with, but those people probably wouldn&#8217;t be shopping for DLC anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=945</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>101</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Vault: Mighty Morphin Power Rangers</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=944</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=944#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 12:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Vault]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mighty Morphin Power Rangers (Super NES) Released after the eponymous series&#8217; first season,&#160;Mighty Morphin Power Rangers&#160;came crashing onto the Super NES at the height of the beat &#8216;em up genre. Unfortunately it does basically nothing to stand out in the world of brawlers, aside from represent the Power Rangers franchise. That&#8217;s not necessarily a bad [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="100%"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><i>Mighty Morphin Power Rangers</i> (Super NES)</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-R4t-wdhQQ5E/TlYN_i2tPKI/AAAAAAAABGE/bvGSZTLra50/s1600/1283039622-MightyMorphinPowerRangers.jpeg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="140" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-R4t-wdhQQ5E/TlYN_i2tPKI/AAAAAAAABGE/bvGSZTLra50/s200/1283039622-MightyMorphinPowerRangers.jpeg" width="200" /></a></div>
<p>Released after the eponymous series&#8217; first season,&nbsp;<i>Mighty Morphin Power Rangers</i>&nbsp;came crashing onto the Super NES at the height of the beat &#8216;em up genre. Unfortunately it does basically nothing to stand out in the world of brawlers, aside from represent the <i>Power Rangers</i> franchise. That&#8217;s not necessarily a bad thing, as a solid game with a hot property slapped on it is often all a kid is asking for when he chooses the game most deserving of his allowance money.</p>
<p><i>Power Rangers </i>is seven stages long, although five of them are two parters. They play out in a straightforward manner, you&#8217;ll run around locations as varied as &#8220;park&#8221; and &#8220;weirdly spacious sewer&#8221; beating up putties until the boss shows himself. At that point, you&#8217;ll transform into your Ranger alter ego and go through another level of putty massacre. Finally, you&#8217;ll fight the boss, then be returned to the character select screen and do it all again. That is, except for the last two levels, which play out like a fighting game as you take on one giant enemy as the Megazord. After that, you&#8217;re treated to a cinematic of the gang going for a joyride (no seat belts) and then watching Zack dance at their favorite gym/juice bar.</p>
<p>The in-game model for the Power Rangers is an obvious pallet swap for each ranger, which is a bit disconcerting of the girls. At least for the Pink Ranger, whose uniform had a skirt on it in the show. Less of a problem for the Yellow Ranger, since she was a dude in the Japanese original. 90% of the game is spent defeating putties of various colors, which is not that exciting. The game mixes it up with a few weird robot enemies and the&nbsp;occasional&nbsp;platforming section, but there&#8217;s really not much to it. The boss fights are all pretty easy, and against foes that apparently were in the first season of the show, but were not recognizable to me. There&#8217;s no sign of Rita, Goldar or even that other guy. Well, Rita does show up after the credits, but you don&#8217;t get to fight her or anything. An image of her just shows up in the sky. Maybe that was meant as a hint for the sequel? &#8220;Hey kids, maybe we&#8217;ll make another game in which you can finally fight the people you care about!&#8221;</p>
<p>The biggest surprise for me, when I pulled this game out of the vault, was the weird code I got after the game&#8217;s credits. Apparently there actually is a two player mode in this game, but it&#8217;s just one-on-one zord vs. giant enemy fighting. It&#8217;s essentially the last two stages of the game, but with a human controlling the enemy. That last fight of the game, by the way, was the only time I died in the whole half an hour it took me to beat the game. That last boss has like twice as much health as the Megazord! What do you want me to do?</p>
<p>Anyway, <i>Mighty Morphin Power Rangers </i>is a burning hot shot of nostalgia in its first few minutes, and then kind of boring for a while, and then a little bit difficult at the very end. As someone who remembers renting the title and being thoroughly entertained, I was pleased enough with it. But if you don&#8217;t have a place in your heart (buried&nbsp;deep down, I&#8217;m sure) where you still care about the Power Rangers, you probably would see this game the way it really is: mediocre.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=944</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>C.A.T: Billy Idol</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=943</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=943#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 10:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=943</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Billy Idol &#8211; Billy Idol (1982) We&#8217;ve featured some fairly innovative and cutting edge albums lately, this is not one of them, but I&#8217;ll go ahead and tell you that despite what ever preconceived notions you may have, this album is worth listening to. The debut solo album from the frontman of Generation X, Billy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:x-large;">Billy Idol &#8211; <i>Billy Idol (1982)</i></span></td>
<td width="150">
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-korV-P7ZVN0/TlVcQq5gpSI/AAAAAAAACEg/Gjic5eI6lf4/s1600/Billy_Idol_Album.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 200px; height: 199px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-korV-P7ZVN0/TlVcQq5gpSI/AAAAAAAACEg/Gjic5eI6lf4/s200/Billy_Idol_Album.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5644519149441951010" /></a>We&#8217;ve featured some fairly innovative and cutting edge albums lately, this is not one of them, but I&#8217;ll go ahead and tell you that despite what ever preconceived notions you may have, this album is worth listening to. The debut solo album from the frontman of <i>Generation X</i>, Billy Idol&#8217;s self-titled debut is pure 80s pop goodness with a little bit of angst that&#8217;s rocking&#8217; good fun. No it doesn&#8217;t have much credibility when it comes to depth or great songwriting but it&#8217;s light listening of the best kind.</p>
<p>Despite his image, Billy&#8217;s debut is closer to new wave or pop/rock than punk. It&#8217;s an album that&#8217;s all about big hooks, catchy choruses and fantastic guitar work by Bill&#8217;s longtime guitarist Steve Stevens. Billy may present himself as a punk but unlike most punks he can actually sing. Vocally Billy is more reminiscent of Mick Jagger than someone like Johnny Rotten, with kind of a charismatic swagger and &#8220;Do ya think I&#8217;m sexy? Roughness.&#8221; It opens with a bang with the three best songs on the album and never slows down. Some classics include &#8220;White Wedding&#8221; and &#8220;Hot in the City&#8221; as featured in <i>Big</i> though any of these songs were good enough to be singles. Got to give it to Billy, the man knows melody and has fun doing it.</p>
<p>I like to think of Billy Idol as like the Jason Statham of rock and roll. He acts like a tough guy (which is entertaining) and has some talent, but he&#8217;s not really respected for his craft. Billy Idol delivered a handful of hits back in the day but there&#8217;s not much more than what&#8217;s on the surface. Though perhaps I&#8217;m digging a little too deep, really shouldn&#8217;t the only requirement for a song to be good is for one to like how it sounds? So in that simplified sense I like this album and I like Billy Idol, with all the cheesy artists that came out of the 80s he&#8217;s one that&#8217;s still kind of cool.</p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;Come On, Come On&#8221;, &#8220;Hot in the City&#8221;, &#8220;White Wedding&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=943</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blinkerton</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=942</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=942#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 04:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last saturday I witnessed something very special for any Weezer fan with a true blast from the past. Honestly I think it would of been a treat for any Weezer fan, even those who may have grown cynical after Weezer started recording songs like ugh… &#8220;Beverly Hills&#8221;. How could one show satisfy all walks of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-0y6Ela_E3CE/TlVY3bosbJI/AAAAAAAACEI/4syuW92c2CA/s1600/weezer-5-thumb-535x357.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 267px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-0y6Ela_E3CE/TlVY3bosbJI/AAAAAAAACEI/4syuW92c2CA/s400/weezer-5-thumb-535x357.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5644515417313275026" /></a>Last saturday I witnessed something very special for any <i>Weezer</i> fan with a true blast from the past. Honestly I  think it would of been a treat for any <i>Weezer</i> fan, even those who may have grown cynical after <i>Weezer</i> started recording songs like ugh… &#8220;Beverly Hills&#8221;. How could one show satisfy all walks of <i>Weezer</i> fan? By playing <i>The Blue Album</i> and <i>Pinkerton</i> back to back in their entirety. </p>
<p>Earlier I mentioned <i>Weezer</i> fans that had grown cynical and even I must admit to being one of those few from time to time. I feel like it used to be  cool to like <i>Weezer</i> but now I often feel embarrassed to admit to liking them. Maybe it&#8217;s because they&#8217;ve gone somewhat cheesy or mainstream (collaborations with &#8216;Lil Wayne and All American Rejects don&#8217;t help), or maybe they&#8217;ve just been around too long. Anyway you look at it I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s any denying that <i>Weezer&#8217;s</i> first two albums contain their best work and some of the best alternative rock of the 90s and that&#8217;s what made this night so special. In a way it was like cheap travel and probably somewhat nostalgic for some, I was kind of young back then so I can&#8217;t really speak of any nostalgia. I don&#8217;t have too much to say about the show but I&#8217;ll leave a few comments about what I liked and didn&#8217;t and everything in between</p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-TUkn-nxwwpY/TlVY8vjitbI/AAAAAAAACEQ/UvDAInH3nIA/s1600/6063203057_67268034e4.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 266px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-TUkn-nxwwpY/TlVY8vjitbI/AAAAAAAACEQ/UvDAInH3nIA/s400/6063203057_67268034e4.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5644515508559721906" /></a><b>Opening Act: The Thermals</b><br />
<br />After waiting in line for a little over a half an hour the doors opened at about 7:10 and at 8:00 the show began. Going in I didn&#8217;t even know there was an opening act, at least I couldn&#8217;t find any info about it before the show. Despite being around for almost ten years I&#8217;d never heard of the <i>The Thermals</i>, suppose that&#8217;s why they were still an opening band. This Pop/Punk trio hailing from Portland gave an energetic performance that was fortunately quick to the point. They kind of reminded me of like an indie rock <i>Green Day</i> which was fun, though I will admit to spacing out in the middle of their set. Though they didn&#8217;t drag anything out and seemed fairly grateful to be there so I&#8217;ll give em a big sweaty thumbs up, good job.</p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-f16oJ_ZtCb0/TlVZLmGL0xI/AAAAAAAACEY/WsrhQy2hJKQ/s1600/weezer-13.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 267px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-f16oJ_ZtCb0/TlVZLmGL0xI/AAAAAAAACEY/WsrhQy2hJKQ/s400/weezer-13.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5644515763718705938" /></a><b>Weezer: The Blue Album</b><br />
<br />FInally at around nine, <i>Weezer</i> took the stage to a crowd of anxious fans doing the <i>Weezer</i> hand logo and tore right into &#8220;My Name is Jonas&#8221;. Right away I was glad to see Patrick Wilson playing drums as I know he&#8217;s mostly switched to guitar these days and guess what? He played drums for every single song in both sets, awesome? The arrangements of the songs kept fairly close to the album but with a little less keyboard and no acoustic guitar (until &#8220;Butterfly&#8221; in the second set.) Rivers Cuomo kept to singing the numbers fairly straightforward, only occasionally pointing to the audience of making Brian Bell sing a part just cause. Though what was really strange was Rivers lack of communication with the audience. Usually he seems to be a pretty interactive and energetic performer but this night it was all business. Maybe he just didn&#8217;t feel like it, or maybe he did it for the older <i>Weezer</i> fans who hate what <i>Weezer</i> has become and just came to hear the music? Either way it wasn&#8217;t a big deal and highlights from the first half of the show were definitely &#8220;In the Garage&#8221; and &#8220;Holiday.&#8221; </p>
<p><b>Intermission</b><br />
<br />After finishing a solid rendition of <i>The Blue Album</i>, <i>Weezer</i> left the stage to let long time <i>Weezer</i> archivist/roadie/unofficial fifth member of the band Karl Koch do a slideshow about the early years of <i>Weezer</i>. Karl really made up for the lack of intimacy Rivers had shown towards the audience and gave everyone a few good chuckles. Some of the best parts of the slideshow were early reviews talking about how bad <i>Weezer</i> was, they&#8217;re good sports, I enjoyed this segment verily. </p>
<p><b>Weezer: Pinkerton</b><br />
<br />Ah, this is what I was really psyched for and I think <i>Pinkerton</i> may have actually overshadowed <i>The Blue Album</i>. Though it definitely doesn&#8217;t have the hits that <i>Blue</i> has, on stage it just rocked so hard. The riffs were crunchy the melodies and backup vocals tight and I felt very fortunate to see these songs that don&#8217;t see the light of day to often anymore. Really it was all great but my favorite moments were probably; &#8220;The Good Life&#8221; (My favorite <i>Weezer</i> song), &#8220;El Scorcho&#8221; and &#8220;Why Bother&#8221;. The only downer to this whole show was the lack of an encore. I guess twenty songs is a lot but for <i>Weezer</i> to leave the stage after &#8220;Butterfly only to come back and play &#8220;Blast Off&#8221; was very strange. For those who don&#8217;t know &#8220;Blast Off&#8221; was a <i>Weezer</i> rarity that was eventually included on River&#8217;s demo solo album and was actually played live for the first time at this show. I felt honored to be a part of that group but it does seem weird to go to a <i>Weezer</i> show without seeing &#8220;Island in the Sun&#8221; or &#8220;Hash Pipe&#8221;. This show really was the closest thing to actually traveling back in time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=942</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Killed Your Brother and I Want to Kill You</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=941</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=941#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2011 21:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earth Defense Force: Insect Armageddon In a lot of ways, EDF: Insect Armageddon is better than its surprise hit predecessor. The voice cast is better, the controls are significantly tighter and it finally adds the online multiplayer that the previous game so desperately needed. It seems like everything a fan could ask for. But the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="100%"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><i>Earth Defense Force: Insect Armageddon</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/2.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-FipTzhnErmI/TlAjgzwGu0I/AAAAAAAABF8/41ffhcUWIM8/s1600/Insect_Armageddon.jpeg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-FipTzhnErmI/TlAjgzwGu0I/AAAAAAAABF8/41ffhcUWIM8/s200/Insect_Armageddon.jpeg" width="158" /></a></div>
<p>In a lot of ways, <i>EDF: Insect Armageddon</i> is better than its surprise hit predecessor. The voice cast is better, the controls are significantly tighter and it finally adds the online multiplayer that the previous game so desperately needed. It seems like everything a fan could ask for. But the problem is the last <i>Earth Defense Force </i>game, <i>2017</i>, came out at a time when you could get away with a being a laughably poor game, and those years of progress reflect harshly on this new, obvious cash grab.</p>
<p>Identifying what&#8217;s wrong with <i>Insect Armageddon </i>is as much about identifying what was right with <i>2017</i>. That game came out in early 2007, before <i>Halo 3</i>, before <i>Bioshock</i>, before XBLA was a serious place to buy quality games. It gave us a new, ridiculous world, where the earth was being invaded by giant insects that also had space ships and robots. Where everyone spoke the dumbest lines with worse acting. Where entire skyscrapers fells after being shot by a machine gun a little. It was a gamer&#8217;s game, and it&#8217;s ridiculous level of camp matched its inexplicably fun gameplay to make it a cult classic. But when has making a sequel to a cult classic ever worked out?</p>
<p><i>Insect Armageddon</i> introduces classes to the series, which can be leveled up given enough experience. This means you can play as a jet pack guy, a shield guy or even a turret guy. It also means you can&#8217;t access a lot of the weapons you pick up in the game, despite all the classes basically using the same weapon types. So instead of continually upgrading your arsenal, you&#8217;re forced to grind out levels as your class of choice. Each class can level up to level 8, I played as the turret guy for the entire campaign and finished just short of level 4. That&#8217;s right, over the course of the <i>entire game</i>, I only leveled up twice. A rarely got to try new weapons and didn&#8217;t unlock many of the meaningful upgrades to my class. A game like this, where the core gameplay is so repetitive, needs to reward players with constant progress. <i>Insect Armageddon </i>doesn&#8217;t do that fast enough. There aren&#8217;t even checkpoints, so if you die on a level, all that XP and any new weapons you picked up are just gone.</p>
<p>Dying wasn&#8217;t really a concern of mine on normal difficulty, however, since health pickups were plentiful and enemies not that dangerous. If you do fall in combat, you can be resurrected by one of your two AI buddies. They&#8217;re probably the funniest part of the game, since one of them is clearly based on Will Smith, he even says &#8220;welcome to earth&#8221; every once in a while. The rest of the games humor is a little more forced, as you listen to the lady who gives you orders bicker with the less-than-helpful intel guy. Beyond that there&#8217;s a weird homage to Captain Sully, and that&#8217;s about it for the speaking roles. There&#8217;s not really that much of a story, you start fighting giant ants and end fighting robotic giant ants, with a little variety in between.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll spend most of your time in <i>Insect Armageddon </i>firing into hordes of giant insects. When they die, they instantly evaporate, denying you any joy in the results of your carnage. Every once in a while you&#8217;ll have to fight a bigger enemy by shooting it in its giant, glowing weak spot. This takes far too long, as enemies show no sign of weakening until they die. Often, I&#8217;d find myself just standing in place shooting my endless supply of rockets into my enemy&#8217;s space hole, waiting and waiting for it to finally explode. This is the first game in a long time that actually made my trigger finger sore.</p>
<p><i>Insect Armageddon</i> makes a lot of improvements over <i>2017</i>, but as everyone knows, unintentionally bad can be hilarious and fun, intentionally bad is no good for anyone. This game&#8217;s forced bad dialogue, decidedly poor gameplay variety and slow character progression made it a chore to play. <i>Insect Armageddon</i> simply is not bad enough or good enough to be a worthwhile experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=941</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Monkey Magic</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=940</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=940#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2011 04:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Enslaved: Odyssey to the West Here&#8217;s a review of a game I wish I had played last year. Enslaved is the latest game from developer Ninja Theory, the team behind PS3-exclusive Heavenly Sword and the upcoming Devil May Cry reboot&#160;DmC. It is a game that does not break new ground, borrowing its action-adventure gameplay heavily [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="100%"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><i>Enslaved: Odyssey to the West</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-QBDzfjikphU/Tk8gHJsjQlI/AAAAAAAABF4/4u7fhsiiYMA/s1600/Enslaved_Odyssey_to_the_West.jpeg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-QBDzfjikphU/Tk8gHJsjQlI/AAAAAAAABF4/4u7fhsiiYMA/s200/Enslaved_Odyssey_to_the_West.jpeg" width="161" /></a></div>
<p>Here&#8217;s a review of a game I wish I had played last year. <i>Enslaved </i>is the latest game from developer Ninja Theory, the team behind PS3-exclusive <i>Heavenly Sword </i>and the upcoming <i>Devil May Cry </i>reboot&nbsp;<i>DmC</i>. It is a game that does not break new ground, borrowing its action-adventure gameplay heavily from the likes of&nbsp;<i>Uncharted, Prince of Persia</i>&nbsp;and <i>God of War</i>, but wraps around that solid base a story that is simply one of the most engaging I have played in a while.</p>
<p>Much of what makes this game great is its Hollywood ties. Alex Garland (<i>28 Days Later, Sunshine</i>) wrote the story of <i>Enslaved</i>, based on the Chinese classic <i>Journey to the West</i>, the same novel that inspired <i>Dragon Ball</i>. In the distant future, the modern world is in ruins. The only remnants of our civilization are ancient mechs who still do what they where designed to do: kill humans. The few people that are left face the constant threat of abduction by slavers. As the game begins, Monkey, a muscular wild man and Trip, a brainy lady, manage to escape a slaver transport. Monkey is knocked out, so Trip puts a mind control headband on him, which wounds Monkey if he disobeys her and kills him if she dies. Trip enlists Monkey&#8217;s help in getting back to her home some 300 miles away.</p>
<p>Andy Serkis plays Monkey and I imagine he did a lot of mocap for this game as well, just like <i>Heavenly Sword</i>. We&#8217;re living in a post-<i>L.A. Noire </i>world, so I can&#8217;t say these are the best in-game performances I&#8217;ve seen, but they&#8217;re close. The interactions between Monkey and Trip are shockingly nuanced and make the story rather touching. It helps that the whole game is beautiful, set in a vibrant, largely desolate world that is so much more colorful than most games these days. There are plenty of cinematics that&nbsp;seamlessly&nbsp;integrate with the gameplay and overall the game feels a little bit like <i>Avatar</i>. Except you can play it.</p>
<p>The combat in <i>Enslaved </i>is your basic heavy attack/light attack fare, with counters, evades and simple combos to keep it interesting. Your only weapon is a staff (the legendary extending staff that Goku also had) which can shoot blasts of plasma that damage or stun enemy mechs too. But getting to enemies is far more interesting that actually destroying them in this game. You often don&#8217;t stand at chance at a distance, so you&#8217;ll have to&nbsp;maneuver&nbsp;around cover and rely on Trip to distract enemies while you close in on them. It&#8217;s simple, but it adds a nice puzzle element to the game. To mix it up further, there are turret sections, races on your hover disc (called your cloud) and plenty of platforming. Platforming in <i>Enslaved </i>is pretty worry-free, as the game straight up won&#8217;t let you jump to your death in almost all situations. Instead, you just jump along an obvious linear path, which discourages exploration, but adds to the game&#8217;s cinematic quality.</p>
<p><i>Enslaved </i>was a delight to play and it&#8217;s haunting ending will probably make it stick with me for a long time. The poor game sold terribly, probably because it came out in the packed Q4 2010 without much marketing behind it. During these slow summer months, there hasn&#8217;t been a lot new to play, which I why I would encourage you to seek this one out. It&#8217;s got to be pretty cheap by now and it certainly is worth a look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=940</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>113</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ape Escape</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=939</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=939#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 08:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rise of the Planet of the Apes If you are reading this the apes have won… Or at least they&#8217;ve won over audiences with back to back weekends at the top of the box office and glowing reviews. It&#8217;s one of those things you can&#8217;t believe until you see it. &#8220;Really people like this movie? [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:x-large;"><i>Rise of the Planet of the Apes</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-m1iitjhk_Po/TlAwObehriI/AAAAAAAACD4/hV4sBP5Y29c/s1600/Rise-Of-The-Planet-Of-The-Apes9.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 216px; height: 320px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-m1iitjhk_Po/TlAwObehriI/AAAAAAAACD4/hV4sBP5Y29c/s320/Rise-Of-The-Planet-Of-The-Apes9.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5643063357547327010" /></a><br />
<br />If you are reading this the apes have won… Or at least they&#8217;ve won over audiences with back to back weekends at the top of the box office and glowing reviews. It&#8217;s one of those things you can&#8217;t believe until you see it. &#8220;Really people like this movie? This?&#8221; and now that I&#8217;ve seen it I get it and I&#8217;m glad I went to it. Who would of thought you could breathe some fresh air into a franchise that as far as I&#8217;m concerned has been dead for over forty years? Sure it bears little resemblance to the series made famous by Charlton Heston, Roddy McDowall, and let&#8217;s not forget the author of the original book Pierre Boulle, but <i>Rise</i> still embodies the original series&#8217; spirit of rebelling against a over controlling society and it&#8217;s only about a million times better than that god awful Tim Burton/Mark Wahlberg fiasco.</p>
<p>Summed up it&#8217;s about scientist Will Rodman (James Franco) and his search for a cure for Alzheimers, which his dad Dick Solomon, I mean John Lithgow suffers from. The serum and later some kind of gas I guess is tested on apes, vastly increasing their intelligence, most notably in the case of a test subject&#8217;s offspring that Franco names Caesar (Andy Serkis.) After the collapse of the project we find Will raising and bonding with Caesar while advancing his research. Yada, yada, Caesar misbehaves, ends up in an ape rescue, and eventually leads the apes to rebel against society. </p>
<p><i>Rise</i> is more or less one of those &#8220;man plays god with nature&#8221; morality tales that Michael Crichton might of dreamed up when working on projects like <i>Jurassic Park</i> or <i>Congo</i>. Though the scientific aspect is clearly rushed it keeps the rhythm of the film loose and still exciting. The filmmakers have found a delicate balance where the senses aren&#8217;t being too overloaded by mindless action or pointless scientific jargon. It&#8217;s pacing is light and fun but it still has something to say, so I suppose you could say it&#8217;s the thinking man&#8217;s summer blockbuster. Very appropriately it operates much in the same way as some of the disaster/sci-fi flicks of the 70s, like <i>Soylent Green</i> or <i>Omega Man</i> (both with Charlton Heston). Those being solid action flicks that still made an attempt to say something whether it was about nature or civil rights or whatever. So it&#8217;s refreshing to see a movie that although appearing to be made for no more than monetary gain actually has a story, something I haven&#8217;t received much of this summer. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know that it would of been possible to make this movie without it being a little silly so that&#8217;s something that didn&#8217;t bother me. Even the original is silly to some extent, so I&#8217;m not going to criticize this movie for being a little &#8220;out there.&#8221; One last thing before I wrap this up is that I must give praise to the motion capture work of the apes, it&#8217;s amazing how much they could carry the plot. In a way the apes are the real stars here and James Franco is just kind of like a prop. So if you haven&#8217;t already, I recommend you see the latest in this lengthy franchise, it&#8217;s a nice break from movies that just go &#8220;Boom, boom, bam!&#8221; guess that means it&#8217;s time to split.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=939</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>103</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>C.A.T.: Stands For Decibels</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=938</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=938#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 23:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The dB&#8217;s &#8211; Stands For Decibels (1981) It&#8217;s fitting that last week John did The Feelies&#8217; Crazy Rhythms for a CAT, because whenever I listen to that album I almost always feel like listening to The dB&#8217;s debut as a sort of geeky double feature. &#160;I guess these two albums just always remind me of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="100%"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">The dB&#8217;s &#8211; <i>Stands For Decibels </i>(1981)</span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-mLoWgmgG_Wk/TkxTxNo9JTI/AAAAAAAABAY/xCf6P6RAgIE/s1600/The+dB%2527S+-+Stands+For+Decibels+-+1981.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-mLoWgmgG_Wk/TkxTxNo9JTI/AAAAAAAABAY/xCf6P6RAgIE/s200/The+dB%2527S+-+Stands+For+Decibels+-+1981.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<p>It&#8217;s fitting that last week John did The Feelies&#8217; <i>Crazy Rhythms</i> for a CAT, because whenever I listen to that album I almost always feel like listening to The dB&#8217;s debut as a sort of geeky double feature. &nbsp;I guess these two albums just always remind me of each other because besides being released around the same time, they both embody this jittery brand of nerd-rock that I just find really irresistible.</p>
<p>The biggest difference between these bands has to do with the fact that The dB&#8217;s sound is much more indebted to the power-pop genre, while The Feelies&#8217; sound was bent more towards kinetic noodling. &nbsp;The dB&#8217;s certainly have their more avante-garde moments on <i>Stands For Decibels </i>with songs like &#8220;She&#8217;s Not Worried&#8221; and &#8220;Tearjerkin&#8217;&#8221;, which were written by singer/guitarist Chris Stamey. &nbsp;However Pete Holsapple&#8217;s songs in particular, as well as the album as a whole displays a true knack for classic pop songwriting, which is matched wonderfully by the band&#8217;s willingness to bash the songs out with much gusto.</p>
<p>I guess it makes sense that The dB&#8217;s were fairly misunderstood in their time, as that seems to be the case for most of the great power pop bands, be it Big Star or The Defenestrators. &nbsp;The early eighties were marked by the post-punk and hardcore bands that were thriving in music&#8217;s underground while new wave was thriving in the top 40, and The dB&#8217;s didn&#8217;t really fit into either of those movements though they certainly show faint traces of the latter. &nbsp;But it does often seem like the bands that are most enjoyable to listen to in hindsight are the ones that kind of just did their own thing, and didn&#8217;t tie themselves to any particular trend.</p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks: </b>&#8220;Black And White&#8221;, &#8220;Big Brown Eyes&#8221;, &#8220;I&#8217;m In Love&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=938</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Like A Rollin&#8217; Stone</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=937</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=937#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 04:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Raphael Saadiq &#8211; Stone Rollin&#8217; For me, this summer has pretty much been one big ball of barren blandness in terms of new music, there&#8217;s just hasn&#8217;t been a whole lot that I&#8217;ve latched on to. &#160;So I was pleasantly surprised when I decided to venture a bit outside my usual indie rock fare, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="100%"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Raphael Saadiq &#8211; <i>Stone Rollin&#8217;</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-E27t-VErpSA/Tknsqj52s_I/AAAAAAAABAU/i_e4RJZ450I/s1600/raphael-saadiq-stone-rollin-cover.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="199" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-E27t-VErpSA/Tknsqj52s_I/AAAAAAAABAU/i_e4RJZ450I/s200/raphael-saadiq-stone-rollin-cover.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<p>For me, this summer has pretty much been one big ball of barren blandness in terms of new music, there&#8217;s just hasn&#8217;t been a whole lot that I&#8217;ve latched on to. &nbsp;So I was pleasantly surprised when I decided to venture a bit outside my usual indie rock fare, and check out the latest release from R&amp;B virtuoso Raphael Saadiq, who appears to just now be really hitting his stride as an artist. &nbsp;It&#8217;s one of those rare albums that&#8217;s firmly entrenched in the past, but still somehow manages to frequently transcend it&#8217;s obvious &#8217;60s influences.</p>
<p>In a post-Amy Whinehouse world, neo-soul seems even more like a genre that doesn&#8217;t really have any right to have much relevance. &nbsp;Well as a long-time producer of modern soul artists such as D&#8217;Angelo, Joss Stone, and John Legend, as well as a member of &#8217;90s R&amp;B group Toni! Toni! Tone!, I think Saadiq is just an old pro when it comes to R&amp;B/Soul, and the dude just knows how to pull from all the right influences. &nbsp;You can see obvious homages to Sly &amp; The Family Stone (&#8220;Heart Attack&#8221;), Chuck Berry (&#8220;Radio&#8221;), early James Brown (&#8220;Day Dreams&#8221;), and a plethora of different &#8217;60s sounds all over <i>Stone Rollin&#8217;</i>. &nbsp;However, you always get a sense of Saadiq&#8217;s own personality in lieu of these familiar sounds, as he&#8217;s always willing to use plenty of unorthodox ways of reshaping the sounds of the past to fit his own funky vision.</p>
<p>Saadiq also seems willing to mix in non-R&amp;B influences, such as the gritty garage rock of &#8220;Over You&#8221;, or the hip-hop infused &#8220;Good Man&#8221;. &nbsp;Sometimes the album is brimming with a few too many different sounds, but either way it serves as a loving tribute to the music of the past, while making those sounds still feel fresh and vital today. &nbsp;Basically <i>Stone Rollin&#8217;</i> is a testament to the idea that you can still make exciting and enjoyable music without having to be young and innovative, or pandering to those damn kids with their dubstep and their Odd Futures.</p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;Go To Hell&#8221;, &#8220;Over You&#8221;, &#8220;Day Dreams&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=937</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>3DS First Impressions</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=936</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=936#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 00:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=936</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Friday, Nintendo reduced the price of the 3DS portable console to $169.99 &#8211; making it a tempting purchase for anyone who was on the fence. I hadn&#8217;t bought a new Nintendo handheld since 2006 (my DS Lite) and when I learned about Walmart dropping the price early, I decided to pounce. You see, to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-k2C0al0wc98/TkhoNBNsW5I/AAAAAAAABFs/rjcqURzGJIg/s1600/img1_b.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="195" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-k2C0al0wc98/TkhoNBNsW5I/AAAAAAAABFs/rjcqURzGJIg/s200/img1_b.png" width="200" /></a></div>
<p>On Friday, Nintendo reduced the price of the 3DS portable console to $169.99 &#8211; making it a tempting purchase for anyone who was on the fence. I hadn&#8217;t bought a new Nintendo handheld since 2006 (my DS Lite) and when I learned about Walmart dropping the price early, I decided to pounce. You see, to compensate early adopters who felt cheated, Nintendo is giving out 20 free NES and GBA game downloads as part of the 3DS Ambassador program. Now I am a 3DS Ambassador as well. But is the system worth your money if you can&#8217;t become an Ambassador? Was it worth my money?</p>
<p>The design of the 3DS definitely reminds me of my DS Lite, it&#8217;s even about the same size. Nintendo added a circle pad above the D-pad, which is surprisingly comfortable to use &#8211; a real step up from the PSP&#8217;s one. The stylus storage area was moved to the back of the system, making it a bit of a chore to get your GameBoy pen out unlike the DS Lite, where you could slide it out of the side easily. The system is light, the buttons sufficiently comfortable and the look of the console is nice; I&#8217;m a fan.</p>
<p>The most notable feature of the console is the top screen, with its widescreen aspect ratio and 3D capability. The glasses-free 3D does definitely work and look really good in a game like <i>Ocarina of Time 3D</i>. I didn&#8217;t experience any eye fatigue using the console, although it did feel a little weird just looking at the screen correctly the first few times. Like 3D movies, the effect here is all about depth, not pop, which I think is probably the way to go. Not having to wear the glasses is really nice, although it leaves you very little room to move around. You have to hold the 3DS exactly right, or your eyes won&#8217;t be able to see the screen correctly. I didn&#8217;t think it was that big a deal, but it might be if you spend most of your time playing in bed or somewhere where you can&#8217;t sit comfortably. Overall, I think the 3D is really cool, but probably unnecessary. Playing games in 3D is not really that different from playing games in 2D. Which is why it&#8217;s nice you can turn the 3D off if you want. In fact, Nintendo encourages that for players under six.</p>
<p>The 3DS also has three cameras, which enables it to do some cool stuff. It has two cameras on the back, which you can use to take pictures in 3D and play neat ARG games. The system comes with cards that the camera will recognize and bring to life right before your eyes. It&#8217;s a really neat effect and, as Colin put it, it&#8217;s great that I can finally play games set in my room.&nbsp;The system also sports a gyroscope so you can move around in those ARG games and other games as well, although I think it&#8217;s silly to move a console around that you need to look at in a precise way.</p>
<p>The big downside of the 3DS is the battery life. Allegedly the system only lasts a few hours with all the features turned on. You can turn the 3D off, adjust the brightness, turn off WiFi, and turn on power saver mode to get more time out of the system, but that&#8217;s still not great. Personally, I always put my 3DS on the included dock when I&#8217;m not using it and I haven&#8217;t had it die on me yet. But this could definitely be a problem if you&#8217;re counting on your 3DS for a long flight or something else where you simply can&#8217;t charge it for a while. Ask yourself if it&#8217;s a deal breaker, because knowing Nintendo there probably will be a new, better 3DS coming down the pipeline next year.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m pretty impressed with my 3DS. It&#8217;s really fun to play with and a cool gadget to own. That said, there aren&#8217;t that many games for it yet, especially if upgraded N64 ports aren&#8217;t your thing. So while I really enjoy the 3DS, I think the wisest thing for anyone to do at this point is wait for that one game you really want and get the 3DS then. You never know what Nintendo has up their sleeve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=936</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>C.A.T: Crazy Rhythms</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=935</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=935#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 21:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Feelies &#8211; Crazy Rhythms (1980) This week&#8217;s album was an interesting discovery for myself considering how I actually stumble on this fine little nugget of an album. I was watching Jonathan Demme&#8217;s 1986 film Something Wild a while back when I noticed this offbeat little band playing in the background of a scene between [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:x-large;">The Feelies &#8211; <i>Crazy Rhythms (1980)</i></span></td>
<td width="150">
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-BqdOFZ-1lbg/TkI1nrRM7ZI/AAAAAAAACDw/vqL7Z74wmWg/s1600/the-feelies-crazy-rhythms.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 200px; height: 199px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-BqdOFZ-1lbg/TkI1nrRM7ZI/AAAAAAAACDw/vqL7Z74wmWg/s200/the-feelies-crazy-rhythms.jpg" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5639128639167327634" /></a>This week&#8217;s album was an interesting discovery for myself considering how I actually stumble on this fine little nugget of an album. I was watching Jonathan Demme&#8217;s 1986 film <i>Something Wild</i> a while back when I noticed this offbeat little band playing in the background of a scene between Jeff Daniels and Melanie Griffith. So just for a lark I looked the band up and what a surprise, they weren&#8217;t half bad. In fact their debut album was and still is lauded as one of the best albums of 1980 and why not? In an era dominated by new wave and other relatively gimmicky sub-genres it&#8217;s amazing to see there were bands that just inhabited their own little world. <i>The Feelies</i> are often considered to be &#8220;Post-Punk&#8221; but if you ask me this is a definite precursor to modern indie guitar rock.</p>
<p>When I first listened to &#8220;The Boy with the Perpetual Nervousness&#8221; I was amazed that this was a track that was recorded over 30 years ago. Someone could of told me this was from 2011 and I would of believed them. The production, supported by a wall of lush guitars and energetic rhythms creates an impenetrable wall of music that never fails to impress. Really <i>The Feelies</i> don&#8217;t write songs as much as they write grooves that just build and build, sucking you further in. Though what really adds that extra &#8220;kick&#8221; is the frenetic percussion parts. In my opinion they couldn&#8217;t of picked a better title for the album than &#8220;Crazy Rhythms&#8221;.</p>
<p>My interest in <i>The Feelies</i> is stilly fairly new so I won&#8217;t pretend to know anything about this band other than what I&#8217;ve heard on this record. Though if you&#8217;re a fan of jangley guitar rock and beats to keep your head bobbin&#8217; then check out <i>Crazy Rhythms.</i></p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;Crazy Rhythms&#8221;, &#8220;Fa Ce-La&#8221;, &#8220;Loveless Love&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=935</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Going Medieval</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=934</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=934#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 19:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Kaiser Chiefs &#8211; The Future is Medieval I remember being so excited for this album at one point in time and then when it finally came out I felt nothing. It&#8217;s as if all my excitement and interested peaked in one day and let me explain why. The Future is Medieval was one of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">The Kaiser Chiefs &#8211; <i>The Future is Medieval</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-xeT7AtBdGQE/TkA8mFaEGZI/AAAAAAAACDo/qIeOZWrnLLY/s1600/The%2BFuture%2BIs%2BMedieval.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 200px; height: 200px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-xeT7AtBdGQE/TkA8mFaEGZI/AAAAAAAACDo/qIeOZWrnLLY/s200/The%2BFuture%2BIs%2BMedieval.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5638573358452054418" /></a><br />
<br />I remember being so excited for this album at one point in time and then when it finally came out I felt nothing. It&#8217;s as if all my excitement and interested peaked in one day and let me explain why. <i>The Future is Medieval</i> was one of those albums that was released quickly and somewhat secretly, not unlike <i>The Raconteurs</i> album <i>Consolers of the Lonely</i> or <i>Radiohead&#8217;s</i> surprising <i>King of Limbs</i>. I didn&#8217;t know about this album&#8217;s existence until it was already out so I immediately rushed to listen to it, but there was something off. I originally became a fan of the <i>Chiefs</i> for their energetic and catchy rock songs brimming with poppy optimism, this on the other hand is a much darker album. <i>The Future Is Medieval</i> concentrates more on complex arrangements and musicianship then poppy melodies which is interesting but not half as inviting as the <i>Chiefs</i> last few albums.</p>
<p>Perhaps getting so excited for an album you just heard existed has a dramatic effect on your listening experience? Maybe it built up my expectations far too high? Either way I do notice a definite change in the group&#8217;s songwriting and I&#8217;m not sure how I feel about it. I keep waiting for that catchy single to break out of the pack but it never really takes off in that way. &#8220;When All is Quiet&#8221; has potential in the chorus but I feel the verse&#8217;s descending chord pattern was the wrong choice. &#8220;Man on Mars&#8221; also sounds like it has potential but it&#8217;s not quite there yet. The songs never quite go where you think they should and even the lead single &#8220;Little Shocks&#8221; never takes off into that riotous singalong chorus were so familiar with when it comes to the <i>Chiefs</i></p>
<p>The musicianship and production value sound great and it sounds like the <i>Chiefs</i> are really putting their keyboard player to work. This album can sound new wave, electronic, and even industrial at times which is an intriguing choice, but I miss the old sound. I suppose as a group goes on they should experiment and tool around with their approach but I just hope they don&#8217;t lose touch with their ability to craft songs that you can actually singalong to. </p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;Child of Jago&#8221;, &#8220;Man on Mars&#8221;, &#8220;When All is Quiet&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=934</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>C.A.T.: The Specials</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=933</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=933#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 02:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Specials &#8211; The Specials (1979) It seems that in most of rock&#8217;s more notable subgenres you&#8217;re always bound to find at least one or two albums that stand out as transcendent of their genre, and are really accessible to anyone. &#160;The Specials&#8217; 1979 debut strikes me as one of those albums considering I&#8217;m not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">The Specials &#8211; <i>The Specials </i>(1979)</span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-9CaBWbipOoI/TjitbeBEFOI/AAAAAAAABAQ/Wf6TDbGx5k8/s1600/thespecials.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-9CaBWbipOoI/TjitbeBEFOI/AAAAAAAABAQ/Wf6TDbGx5k8/s200/thespecials.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<p>It seems that in most of rock&#8217;s more notable subgenres you&#8217;re always bound to find at least one or two albums that stand out as transcendent of their genre, and are really accessible to anyone. &nbsp;The Specials&#8217; 1979 debut strikes me as one of those albums considering I&#8217;m not really a fan of ska at all, but the songs on this album are just so good that it doesn&#8217;t matter at all.</p>
<p>I guess the reason I&#8217;ve always been fairly indifferent to ska is that it just seems to me that in general the genre is just punk with some horns and reggae thrown in, and it usually lacks punk&#8217;s intensity or grittiness. &nbsp;Well on <i>The Specials, </i>the music obviously has that prominent reggae element to it, but it has an undeniable grittiness that you rarely find in later ska revival groups. &nbsp;Much of it has to do with the way The Specials and producer Elvis Costello delve into a no-nonsense sound, but also the way the songs deal with the racial and political tensions of late-70&#8242;s Britain.</p>
<p>Still, despite the fact that the album does have elements of punk&#8217;s grittiness, there are still plenty of songs like &#8220;Nite Klub&#8221; and &#8220;Monkey Man&#8221; that are just a lot of fun, and embody the easy skankin&#8217;, pork-pie hat wearin&#8217; &nbsp;imagery that comes to mind when you think of ska. &nbsp;I think it&#8217;s that combination of militant disaffection as well as the attention to pop songcraft that makes an album like <i>The Specials</i> feel so potent, even when it&#8217;s part of a genre that might seem a little too breezy and monotonous for outsiders like myself.</p>
<p>Hmm, seems this is the fourth week in a row we&#8217;ve done a debut album. &nbsp;I wonder how long we can keep that up.</p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;A Message To You Rudy&#8221;, &#8220;Concrete Jungle&#8221;, &#8220;(Dawning Of A) New Era&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=933</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Get Some Poon</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=932</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=932#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 05:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Poon &#8211; Get Some EP Get Some, the newest release from the sexiest band in the world, POON, debuted Thursday night at the number 3 slot on bandcamp.com&#8217;s newest artist page. The instant hit EP is a fan favorite, and is sure to catapult the group back to the fame and fortune they once new. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Poon &#8211; <i>Get Some EP</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/5.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div><a href="http://f.bandcamp.com/z/24/13/2413396118-1.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="" height="200" src="http://f.bandcamp.com/z/24/13/2413396118-1.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<div><i>Get Some, </i>the newest release from the sexiest band in the world, POON, debuted Thursday night at the number 3 slot on bandcamp.com&#8217;s newest artist page. The instant hit EP is a fan favorite, and is sure to catapult the group back to the fame and fortune they once new.</div>
<div>
<div></div>
<div>The EP took a little over three weeks to record, but would have been finished sooner if bass player Izzy Cummings hadn&#8217;t disappeared without a trace for two weeks straight. His arrival in the studio yesterday was celebrated as the group finished the EP, taking no longer than one take on every track.</div>
<div></div>
<div>With hit singles like <i>(I&#8217;m Your) Lovin&#8217; Flame </i>and <i>Witchita </i>to go along with the epic<i> Rock Gospel</i>, it&#8217;s sure to be an&nbsp;instant classic.</div>
</div>
<p><iframe width="400" height="100" style="position: relative; display: block; width: 400px; height: 100px;" src="http://bandcamp.com/EmbeddedPlayer/v=2/album=1441771124/size=venti/bgcol=FFFFFF/linkcol=4285BB/" allowtransparency="true" frameborder="0"><a href="http://poonband.bandcamp.com/album/get-some-ep">Get Some EP by Poon</a></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=932</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>C.A.T: Van Halen</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=931</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=931#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 08:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Van Halen &#8211; Van Halen (1978) For me this summer has been all about the rocking! I don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s playing in the band Poon or simply the fact that it&#8217;s been awhile since I&#8217;ve revisited some of my old rock albums, but it&#8217;s been awesome. Twice a week when I&#8217;m puling freight shifts [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:x-large;">Van Halen &#8211; <i>Van Halen (1978)</i></span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-iS8sj6YgU7w/TjMfLb7gmWI/AAAAAAAACDY/v1a3FMVs2B0/s1600/Van-Halen.jpeg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 200px; height: 200px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-iS8sj6YgU7w/TjMfLb7gmWI/AAAAAAAACDY/v1a3FMVs2B0/s200/Van-Halen.jpeg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5634881840107002210" /></a>For me this summer has been all about the rocking! I don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s playing in the band <i>Poon</i> or simply the fact that it&#8217;s been awhile since I&#8217;ve revisited some of my old rock albums, but it&#8217;s been awesome. Twice a week when I&#8217;m puling freight shifts at Petco I&#8217;ve been going through the same classic rock albums over and over again and I&#8217;m yet to tire of it. I usually rotate around; <i>Deep Purple&#8217;s</i> Machine Head, <i>Cheap Trick at Budokan</i>, a <i>Kiss</i> greatest hits album, <i>Queen&#8217;s</i> A Night at the Opera and of course the classic debut from <i>Van Halen</i>. The last one fits in nicely with this week&#8217;s honoring of 1978, so let&#8217;s &#8220;jump&#8221; in.</p>
<p><i>Van Halen</i> is one of those stellar debuts that&#8217;s so good that almost everything following it is a slight disappointment. Sure <i>1984</i> is a great rock record, but these guys just opened with bang, a big bang. You look at the track listing and it&#8217;s just classic after classic, even the less memorable songs still have fantastic musicianship, led by virtuoso Eddie Van Halen. I&#8217;ve always thought that even if you don&#8217;t like <i>Van Halen</i> you have to respect the talents of Eddie. He is really one of those guys that just reinvented guitar playing (if that was even fathomable) I can&#8217;t even explain it&#8217;s just sheer madness yet so refined at the same time, pure rock ecstasy.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m always amazed by groups that can create such a full sound with just three instruments and a singer, but <i>Van Halen</i> takes it to new levels. You have three very talented musicians all behind a charismatic vocalist oozing with swagger… What&#8217;s not to like? It&#8217;s just a perfectly energetic album that never fails to pump me up, I can&#8217;t wait till my next freight night.</p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;Ain&#8217;t Talkin&#8217; bout Love&#8221;, &#8220;Jaimie&#8217;s Cryin&#8217;&#8221; &#8220;Runnin&#8217; with the Devil&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=931</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Bravest Man I Ever Knew</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=930</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=930#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 06:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows &#8211; Part 2 The whole Harry Potter thing was pretty amazing. The books are one thing; a long-running fantasy series is not without precedent, although the success of the series probably was. But it&#8217;s the film series that truly seems amazing to me. A decade-spanning eight movie series that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><i>Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows &#8211; Part 2</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Cf1HoUI5Opg/TifiSBc4c4I/AAAAAAAABE8/2Jp4AvoTeuQ/s1600/Deathly-hallows-p2-1.jpeg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Cf1HoUI5Opg/TifiSBc4c4I/AAAAAAAABE8/2Jp4AvoTeuQ/s320/Deathly-hallows-p2-1.jpeg" width="216" /></a></div>
<p>The whole <i>Harry Potter </i>thing was pretty amazing. The books are one thing; a long-running fantasy series is not without precedent, although the success of the series probably was. But it&#8217;s the film series that truly seems amazing to me. A decade-spanning eight movie series that featured a cast that grew up with its fans. That&#8217;s a hell of a thing, and I can&#8217;t imagine it ever happening again. I&#8217;ve been visiting Hogwarts for the better part of my life now, and bidding goodbye to the franchise as I enter real adulthood is as fitting and bittersweet for me as it is for Harry, Ron and Hermione.</p>
<p>This is the eight movie in the series, you&#8217;re either going to see it or you&#8217;re not. Nothing is going to persuade anyone at this point. Indeed, not only is it movie eight, it&#8217;s also a part two, so the barrier to entry for newcomers is damn near insurmountable. This is a movie for the fans. The ones who read the books, learned the spells, got the tattoos. There are some parts of the movie that straight-up won&#8217;t even make sense to those that have just seen the films, since important plot points play off of minor details that were&nbsp;omitted&nbsp;from earlier movies. That&#8217;s what happens when a series has so many different directors. But the big scenes will work for anyone who has made the slightest effort to keep up, as this conclusion centers around epic battles and long-awaited revelations.</p>
<p>Picking up immediately where Part One left off, Harry, Ron and Hermione are still hunting down Lord Voldemort&#8217;s horcruxes. Things remain as bleak as ever, The Dark Lord now has the Elder Wand, the most powerful wand, and the Order of the Phoenix is weak and spread out. As Harry learns more about horcruxes, the more disturbed he gets, leading to some hopefully shocking revelations and epic battles. Notably, The Battle of Hogwarts, in which students and teachers stand united against Voldemort&#8217;s army, is one of the most awe-inspiring battles this side of <i>The Lord of the Rings</i>. And what makes it all work is that there is so much emotion behind these battles, I actually cared about what would happen, unlike a movie like <i>Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen</i>. Every shot of this incredible battle is brimming with familiar faces, some who we won&#8217;t ever see again.</p>
<p>Little is changed from the book and most of it is in the service of making the story work better in this format. Professor McGonagall&#8217;s role is a little different and a lot more bad ass because, why not? Maggie Smith earned (and nailed) it. Alan Rickman is perhaps a little too indulgent in his Snape-isms, but who cares? It&#8217;s the last time he gets to be that crazy son of a bitch. Daniel Radcliffe has grown into a real actor and provides the film with a strong star, along with Rupert Grint and Emma Watson. Everyone has their time to shine here, making Part Two one of the most satisfying movies of the year.</p>
<p><i>Harry Potter </i>was an incredible series. Somewhere between the <i>Star Wars </i>and <i>Up </i>series. I can&#8217;t imagine anything else taking up its mantle, and I don&#8217;t really want anything to&#8230; At least not for a while. Let there be no doubt, this is the end of the series: they&#8217;ve filmed everything. In an era of unsatisfying remakes and prequels (see: all comic book movies not made by Marvel or Chris Nolan) it&#8217;s been a real ride seeing one of the most&nbsp;imaginative&nbsp;worlds in recent fiction come to life. The <i>Harry Potter </i>series has given me a lot, everything from jokes about characters resembling people I know to laughter at Amazon reviews about the flying broomstick vibrator. And now it&#8217;s done. It&#8217;s done well, to be sure, but it&#8217;s done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=930</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>O Captain! My Captain!</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=929</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=929#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 00:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Captain America: The First Avenger With the final Avengers piece in place it&#8217;s only a matter of time before we&#8217;ll all be watching the most hyped superhero movie of all time. So last but not least we have ol&#8217; red, white, and blue Captain America in a slick WWII era action flick. Originally created in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:x-large;"><i>Captain America: The First Avenger</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-hlUNx69e0qI/TjSx_djasPI/AAAAAAAACDg/3Sxy7qgn2ak/s1600/captain_america_the_first_avenger_movie.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 214px; height: 320px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-hlUNx69e0qI/TjSx_djasPI/AAAAAAAACDg/3Sxy7qgn2ak/s320/captain_america_the_first_avenger_movie.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5635324737570386162" /></a> With the final <i>Avengers</i> piece in place it&#8217;s only a matter of time before we&#8217;ll all be watching the most hyped superhero movie of all time. So last but not least we have ol&#8217; red, white, and blue Captain America in a slick WWII era action flick. Originally created in 1941 by Joe Simon and Marvel icon Jack Kirby, it&#8217;s been a long wait for Cap to finally get a decent adaptation on the big screen. There were some serials, a few made for TV things, and even a bizarre 90s flick starring J.D. Salinger&#8217;s son… But now all of those can be forgotten because we a finally have an adaptation worthy of Uncle Sam&#8217;s favorite son.</p>
<p>Cap&#8217;s origin is as typical as any superhero origin. We have an ordinary man who receives extraordinary powers, in this case through a scientific experiment, and then becomes symbol of justice. Chris Evans stars as both the scrawny and brawny versions of super patriot Steve Rogers who simply wants to do his country proud. The early half of the film is stunning in how FX wizards have somehow managed to shrink and whittle down Evans to the shrimpy pre-op Rogers and even after this half there&#8217;s enough humor, and action to firmly hold my interest. Evans is pitch perfect as the brave yet naive title hero and is in good company with seasoned veterans like Tommy Lee Jones as stern military superior and Hugo Weaving as the film&#8217;s menacing antagonist Red Skull. The action doesn&#8217;t rely too heavily on CGI due to it&#8217;s setting in time, but even scenes heavy with effects are very well polished.</p>
<p>Back when they originally announced an <i>Avengers</i> movie I became a little worried that all the films leading up to it we be quickly dished out with little care but to make a buck. Now I&#8217;m glad to say that this was not the case and Marvel has truly delivered on a solid series of solo superhero flicks. <i>Captain America</i> like <i>Thor</i> is a well made action film with great stars, visuals, and humor and the strength to act as a standalone film. Really my only problem here is that this film is so firmly connected with the upcoming <i>Avengers</i> flick. I look forward to <i> The Avengers</i> but I&#8217;m pretty tired of it tagging along to the end of all these movies, can&#8217;t they just end without Samuel L. Jackson showing up? He&#8217;s cool I guess, but I&#8217;m here to see Cap, why must we cut into his time? This should be Cap&#8217;s moment in the sun yet they have to keep constantly reminding us of <i>The Avengers</i>. It&#8217;s not a big deal but it&#8217;s a little annoying, that flick better be damn good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=929</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>108</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Out Of The Cabin And Into The Wild</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=928</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=928#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 23:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bon Iver &#8211; Bon Iver Prior to checking out Bon Iver&#8217;s self-titled album, I didn&#8217;t know a whole lot about this band besides that the first Bon Iver album was record by a bearded dude alone in a Wisconsin cabin, and that said bearded dude went on to appear on Kanye West&#8217;s last album. &#160;Well [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Bon Iver &#8211; <i>Bon Iver</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-YvdnSpw145c/Tidlva7eQnI/AAAAAAAABAM/-4lgVmHcxtA/s1600/bon-iver-album-cover-610x610-592.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-YvdnSpw145c/Tidlva7eQnI/AAAAAAAABAM/-4lgVmHcxtA/s200/bon-iver-album-cover-610x610-592.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<p>Prior to checking out Bon Iver&#8217;s self-titled album, I didn&#8217;t know a whole lot about this band besides that the first Bon Iver album was record by a bearded dude alone in a Wisconsin cabin, and that said bearded dude went on to appear on Kanye West&#8217;s last album. &nbsp;Well after giving <i>Bon Iver</i>&nbsp;a few listens, my interest in what is basically Justin Vernon&#8217;s solo project has deepened, though I&#8217;m not gonna say this album is profoundly unique or anything.</p>
<p>Bon Iver&#8217;s first album was a pretty spare sounding piece of melancholy folk, with Vernon&#8217;s high whisper of a voice and his unique use of harmonies being the most striking part of the production. &nbsp;On this self-titled second album, Vernon&#8217;s unique voice is still used to great effect and is what really gives the album its striking beauty. &nbsp;As far as the production, the songs have a much richer sound, as there&#8217;s occasional synths and horns that give the album a sound that sometimes suggests &#8217;80s R&amp;B. &nbsp;Still, Vernon doesn&#8217;t get too carried away with the album&#8217;s sonic richness. &nbsp;In the end this is a folk album, and there&#8217;s still a nice amount of intimacy to these songs despite the occasional foray into bolder and bigger sounds.</p>
<p>So basically I don&#8217;t have a whole lot to say this album other than that it&#8217;s very pretty. &nbsp;The songs aren&#8217;t exactly ones that jump out at you and leave you humming them for hours, but when it&#8217;s so easy to get rapped up in the beauty and the atmosphere of the songs, it doesn&#8217;t really matter. &nbsp;Also, much like The Antlers&#8217; latest album, it&#8217;s a little too downbeat to be a good &#8220;summer album&#8221;, but once we begin the slow descent towards winter, <i>Bon Iver</i> should feel just right.</p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;Perth&#8221;, &#8220;Hinnom, TX&#8221;, &#8220;Calgary&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=928</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>C.A.T.: Pink Flag</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=927</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=927#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 02:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wire &#8211; Pink Flag (1977) By 1977, the punk zeitgeist was reaching it&#8217;s peak as The Clash&#8217;s debut infiltrated the top 20 of the UK album charts, while The Sex Pistols&#8217; debut went to number 1. &#160;Now I was considering talking about either of those albums for this week&#8217;s CAT, but I figured I&#8217;d go [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Wire &#8211; <i>Pink Flag </i>(1977)</span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-H8IFT3vOMFg/TiY9ZCttFnI/AAAAAAAABAI/LovlPY0iwMo/s1600/Wirepinkflagcover.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-H8IFT3vOMFg/TiY9ZCttFnI/AAAAAAAABAI/LovlPY0iwMo/s200/Wirepinkflagcover.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<p>By 1977, the punk zeitgeist was reaching it&#8217;s peak as The Clash&#8217;s debut infiltrated the top 20 of the UK album charts, while The Sex Pistols&#8217; debut went to number 1. &nbsp;Now I was considering talking about either of those albums for this week&#8217;s CAT, but I figured I&#8217;d go for something that went a little more under the radar when it was released in late 1977. &nbsp;Plus, it&#8217;s an album I&#8217;ve just been getting in to recently, which seems to always make writing about an album a little more fun.</p>
<p>It seems a little weird to me that Wire&#8217;s <i>Pink Flag</i> is considered to be the earliest example of post-punk, when the album came out before punk had really lost any noticeable steam, but I guess that just goes to show how fast trends in music are always changing. &nbsp;Wire&#8217;s aesthetic approach certainly owed much to the other punk bands of the time, as <i>Pink Flag</i> doesn&#8217;t feature much more than throbbing bass, pounding drums, and fuzz-drenched guitar, topped off with Colin Newman&#8217;s high-pitched shouts. &nbsp;However, unlike The Sex Pistols or The Clash, there&#8217;s less of an anti-establishment feel to the songs, as the lyrics tend to be on the obscure side, and often the songs feel like the band is just trying to release pent-up emotions rather than make any sort of ideological statement.</p>
<p>Another thing that probably gives <i>Pink Flag</i> such a potent feeling has to do with the lengths of the songs, which usually clock in under a minute and a half, making for a 35-minute album featuring 21 tracks. &nbsp;It adds to the immediacy of the songs, making them feel as if the intensity of the band members playing off each other is almost too intense to maintain for more than a minute or two. &nbsp;However there are a few slower songs, such as the lurching &#8220;Strange&#8221;, which R.E.M. would cover on their seminal 1987 album <i>Document</i>. </p>
<p>These slower songs also point the way to the more experimental electronic influences that would make their way in to Wire&#8217;s subsequent releases, which would earn the band a reputation as one of the more adventurous bands to come out of the punk rock movement. &nbsp;But on <i>Pink Flag</i>, it&#8217;s refreshing to hear these guys prior to their persistence on branching out artistically and just bashing out a bunch of guitar jams.</p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;Lion Tamer&#8221;, &#8220;Mannequin&#8221;, &#8220;1 2 X U&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=927</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I&#8217;m a Troll Man</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=926</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=926#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 20:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Troll Hunter Straight from the whimsical heart of Norway I give you Scandinavia&#8217;s answer to Cloverfield with Trolljegeren aka &#8220;Troll Hunter.&#8221; Released into Norwegian theaters last October but just seeing the light of day in June here in the states, Troll Hunter (despite it&#8217;s terrible Syfy Channel sounding name.) is one of the most exciting [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"> <i>Troll Hunter</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-ftd3CUXO3GA/ThZmdIw4HhI/AAAAAAAACC4/6IZZ6McUqFc/s1600/The-Troll-Hunter-2011-Movie-Poster.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 218px; height: 320px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-ftd3CUXO3GA/ThZmdIw4HhI/AAAAAAAACC4/6IZZ6McUqFc/s320/The-Troll-Hunter-2011-Movie-Poster.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5626797435200740882" /></a>Straight from the whimsical heart of Norway I give you Scandinavia&#8217;s answer to <i>Cloverfield</i> with Trolljegeren aka &#8220;Troll Hunter.&#8221; Released into Norwegian theaters last October but just seeing the light of day in June here in the states, <i>Troll Hunter</i> (despite it&#8217;s terrible Syfy Channel sounding name.) is one of the most exciting films of the handheld camera era yet. The suspense is immense as we follow these gruesome behemoths and even learn a little bit about Norwegian folklore along the way. </p>
<p>The film follows a trio of student filmmakers trying to make a documentary about a supposed bear poacher in Western Norway. This &#8220;bear poacher&#8221; is one Hans, a mysteriously cold trailer-dwelling individual who enjoys his privacy. Gone almost every night into the secluded woods, the group follows Hans on one of his late night excursions only to discover that he isn&#8217;t poaching bears at all…. He&#8217;s hunting Trolls. </p>
<p>First of all I think anyone&#8217;s immediate gut reaction to this premise would be something around the lines of, &#8220;That sounds SO BAD.&#8221; Which is understandable, I mean how many cheesy monster movies have more or less the exact same setup? The difference is how this ridiculous concept is handled both technically and from a plotting standpoint. The acting is good, the story and mythology are highly engrossing, and the faux documentary approach makes it all feel shocking real. Not to mention that <i>Troll Hunter</i> is when it wants to be, pretty scary. Who would of thought a movie about trolls could of been scary?</p>
<p>The reason <i>Troll Hunter</i> is so effective is because it goes for realism. Sure there are three headed trolls being turned turned into stone by UV rays, but they are well photographed through brief glimpses and blend in well to their environment. The CGI isn&#8217;t amazing but it&#8217;s been well utilized, never being overused. They also interact very well with the cast, resulting in an exhilarating experience. Speaking of the cast, I have to tip my hat to Otto Jespersen who plays Hans the trollhunter. Hans maybe a quiet and sometimes stern character, but boy does he just embody a sheer amount of badassery, he&#8217;s great. Though what&#8217;s really interesting is that in reality Otto Jespersen is one of Norway&#8217;s most popular comedians. So how he ended up playing a dead serious trollhunter is beyond me.  As much as I&#8217;d love to talk about more of the details I&#8217;m gonna leave it at here. If there&#8217;s anything else you&#8217;re curious about I highly recommend you check out <i>Troll Hunter</i> it&#8217;s a lot of fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=926</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Host with the Most</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=925</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=925#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 20:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Perfect Host There&#8217;s been a whole jumble of independent films I&#8217;ve wanted to see lately, but haven&#8217;t had much luck actually seeing any of them in theaters. I&#8217;m not even sure if this particular film has received a proper release yet, so let&#8217;s just say I acquired this one by my own means. What [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"> <i>The Perfect Host</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-pXX0HPDB7h0/ThZkwSll7hI/AAAAAAAACCw/aqX5rx3dQAY/s1600/the_perfect_host_poster01.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 217px; height: 320px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-pXX0HPDB7h0/ThZkwSll7hI/AAAAAAAACCw/aqX5rx3dQAY/s320/the_perfect_host_poster01.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5626795565232025106" /></a>There&#8217;s been a whole jumble of independent films I&#8217;ve wanted to see lately, but haven&#8217;t had much luck actually seeing any of them in theaters. I&#8217;m not even sure if this particular film has received a proper release yet, so let&#8217;s just say I acquired this one by my own means. What was my attraction to this particular film? How about the fact that it&#8217;s a dark comedic thriller with David Hyde Pierce! For one I&#8217;m always up for some comedy with a twist of cynicism but also, when&#8217;s the last time anyone saw David Hyde Pierce in a movie? He&#8217;s always a treat to watch, so to see him play against type is more than a pleasant surprise. Sure he&#8217;s still playing that upper class, cultured, connoisseur, type but he&#8217;s also insane with a little glint of murder in his eyes.</p>
<p>Clayne Crawford (who looks and sounds remarkably like Ray Liotta) plays John Taylor a career criminal on the lam after robbing a bank. Stumbling upon a plush L.A. neighborhood, John concocts a plan to pose as friend of a friend of a man named Warwick Wilson (David Hyde Pierce) after going through his mail. Warwick being the gentleman that he is lets John come in for a drink despite the fact that he has  a dinner party in a few hours. Though with Warwick&#8217;s endless prattling, John quickly becomes agitated and soon threatens Warwick&#8217;s life, but slowly looses consciousness after drinking his weight in red wine, &#8220;It&#8217;s a cheeky little drop isn&#8217;t it?&#8221; says Warwick. John awakens to discover that the wine was drugged and that he is now Warwick&#8217;s hostage, what follows is a most unusual party with some very interesting &#8220;guests&#8221;. </p>
<p>John is kept drugged for most of the duration of the film as Warwick includes him in a series of festive events. Meanwhile a detective (Nathaniel Parker) attempts to discover the whereabouts of John Taylor, this seems unnecessary until you see how it eventually connects with the rest of the story. <i>The Perfect Host</i> is essentially all about trying to mislead you with strange and sometimes almost ridiculous twists, which is probably why it&#8217;s been turning so many critics off. Every time I drop by Rotten Tomatoes it seems like it&#8217;s rating just gets lower and lower. Personally I enjoyed the twists, even if they didn&#8217;t all gel together particularly well. One thing I think most can agree on is David Hyde Pierce is a manic joy to watch and I hope he starts turning up in more movies again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=925</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Real Men Kill Each Other</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=924</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=924#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 19:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=924</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mortal Kombat Midway went out of business last year, leaving the future of many of that company&#8217;s legendary series in question. The Mortal Kombat property, along with many of its developers, including series creator Ed Boon, ended up with WB Interactive, creating a new studio called NetherRealm. Their first game is a reboot of sorts, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><i>Mortal Kombat</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-0fBBJzoyNyQ/ThSxTrDCDjI/AAAAAAAABDw/tuZfeyJ8EUo/s1600/Mortal_Kombat_PS3_Boxart.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-0fBBJzoyNyQ/ThSxTrDCDjI/AAAAAAAABDw/tuZfeyJ8EUo/s1600/Mortal_Kombat_PS3_Boxart.jpg" /></a></div>
<p>Midway went out of business last year, leaving the future of many of that company&#8217;s legendary series in question. The <i>Mortal Kombat </i>property, along with many of its developers, including series creator Ed Boon, ended up with WB Interactive, creating a new studio called NetherRealm. Their first game is a reboot of sorts, returning <i>Mortal Kombat </i>to its roots in more ways than one. Consequently, this ninth game is another stellar entry in one of gaming&#8217;s most prolific franchises.</p>
<p><i>Mortal Kombat </i>is a retelling of the first three games in the series, featuring the entire cast of those three games. Scorpion, Sub-Zero, Johnny Cage, Nightwolf, everyone you actually care about is here. What&#8217;s more, they&#8217;ve included a story mode ala <i>Mortal Kombat vs. DC Universe</i>, that lets you play through the first three games in an alternate universe &#8220;let&#8217;s change the future&#8221; kind of way. It&#8217;s hands down the most entertaining story mode I&#8217;ve experienced in a fighting game, even though a lot of the story&#8217;s moments are pretty cheap. There are way too many 2-on-1 fights for my taste, and Shao Kahn is annoyingly difficult to defeat.</p>
<p>Just as the story has gone back in time, so has the gameplay. <i>Mortal Kombat </i>returns the series to flat 2D combat, abandoning the various fighting styles and 3D fighting of recent entries in the series. NetherRealm did keep the power meter from <i>MK vs. DCU</i>, which can now be used to power up moves, break combos and unleash devastating x-ray attacks and various levels. What this means is the game is extremely playable for veterans of the series and fairly welcoming to newcomers. The game is easy to pick up, compared to something like <i>Street Fighter IV</i>, and for my money, more fun too.</p>
<p>This is probably the most gruesome game I&#8217;ve ever seen. The x-ray attacks are pretty painful to watch, as you see characters have valuable bones broken and eyes stabbed. But the fatalities raise the bar. Probably the most famous one is Noob&#8217;s, in which he literally pulls his opponent in half, their innards pouring on the ground as he does so. This is an extremely graphic game, a hard M, if you will. It&#8217;s not for kids. Don&#8217;t give this game to kids. I&#8217;m being serious. It&#8217;s gross and you&#8217;ll feel bad about it if you do.</p>
<p>This is a game with plenty to keep you busy. There are ladders to climb, hundreds of unlockbables and a great online multiplayer feature set. NetherRealm has shown that it will continue to add DLC characters from the latter games in the series as long as gamers are interested. I think that will be a while. <i>Mortal Kombat </i>is back and better than ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=924</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>C.A.T.: Ramones</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=923</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=923#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 21:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Ramones &#8211; Ramones (1976) The 4th of July weekend has once again come to a close, but now let me indulge you with what could easily be declared the great American punk album. &#160;The Ramones&#8217; debut is one of those albums that I&#8217;m sure a lot of people haven&#8217;t even bothered listening to because [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">The Ramones &#8211; <i>Ramones </i>(1976)</span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-1_6QqVYt5yM/ThOGEefuwKI/AAAAAAAABAE/rUKzX6cwuOg/s1600/ramones_ramones-SASD-7250-1163641811.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-1_6QqVYt5yM/ThOGEefuwKI/AAAAAAAABAE/rUKzX6cwuOg/s200/ramones_ramones-SASD-7250-1163641811.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<p>The 4th of July weekend has once again come to a close, but now let me indulge you with what could easily be declared the great American punk album. &nbsp;The Ramones&#8217; debut is one of those albums that I&#8217;m sure a lot of people haven&#8217;t even bothered listening to because they figure every Ramones song sounds exactly the same, so what&#8217;s the point? &nbsp;Well when the songs are brimming with such a potent combination of bubble gum pop and hard-edged guitar punk, is that really such a bad thing?</p>
<p>I guess what makes this the ultimate Ramones album is that it&#8217;s just bursting with the kind of giddy abrasiveness that was the cornerstone of the band&#8217;s sound for over twenty years. &nbsp;Johnny Ramone might very well have been the best punk rock guitarist that ever lived, mainly because he was able to create the perfect antithesis of what the overblown arena-rock guitarist were doing at the time, employing an undying mantra of three chords and no solos. &nbsp;And on this debut, you&#8217;ve got some of Dee Dee Ramone&#8217;s most amusing odes to teenage angst, all delivered in Joey&#8217;s signature faux-British wail.</p>
<p>Considering The Ramones have such a distinct sound, it&#8217;s easy to take them for granted, but I can&#8217;t image what an overwhelming breath of fresh air this debut would have been in 1976. &nbsp;And really, you have to admire the craft that&#8217;s put into such a compact package, as the album runs just under a half hour, but features an overabundance of memorable moments with songs like &#8220;Beat On The Brat&#8221; and &#8220;Now I Wanna Sniff Some Glue&#8221;. &nbsp;Hell, you could even say that The Ramones managed to sum up the entire aesthetic of American punk rock in the album&#8217;s lead-off track, the legendary &#8220;Blitzkrieg Bop&#8221;.</p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;Beat On The Brat&#8221;, &#8220;I Wanna Be Your Boyfriend&#8221;, &#8220;Listen To My Heart&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=923</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Song of Ice and Fire</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=922</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=922#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 04:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[inFAMOUS 2 With all the hubbub surrounding E3, it would have been easy to forget that once of the most exciting games to come out this year was actually released the same day the convention began. inFAMOUS 2 is a stellar sequel that lives up to its memorable predecessor. Since a lot of people just [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><i>inFAMOUS 2</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-H_ueUV3H1ng/Tf2ozRWp2dI/AAAAAAAABCo/LOkuXX5Zgdk/s1600/Infamous_2.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-H_ueUV3H1ng/Tf2ozRWp2dI/AAAAAAAABCo/LOkuXX5Zgdk/s320/Infamous_2.png" width="273" /></a></div>
<p>With all the hubbub surrounding E3, it would have been easy to forget that once of the most exciting games to come out this year was actually released the same day the convention began. <i>inFAMOUS 2 </i>is a stellar sequel that lives up to its memorable predecessor. Since a lot of people just got a chance to play that game after the PSN downtime, now is a great opportunity to pick up another of Sony&#8217;s best exclusive games.</p>
<p><i>inFAMOUS 2 </i>opens with quite a bang as Cole has his first encounter with the beast, the monster we learned about in the final moments of the first game. Cole obviously is outmatched by the beast, so he and his portly companion Zeke travel down to New Marais, basically a renamed New Orleans, in search of getting Cole even more power. Immediately Cole makes another new enemy in the militia who&#8217;ve been running the town since some disaster. Together with some new female friends, Cole works toward helping the city, all the while building up his strength for the beast&#8217;s arrival.</p>
<p>Once again, powering up Cole depends somewhat on moral choices. In the first game, that meant more precise powers for good choices and more explosive powers for evil decisions. That seems to be the case this time too, but with the added incentive of ice and fire powers making two playthroughs practically necessary. Controlling Cole still feels great and Suckerpunch even added some new, faster ways of getting around the city. <i>inFAMOUS 2 </i>is all about getting more powerful, and you certainly will feel that way by the end of the game.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, the games vibrant visuals and tight gameplay are marred by poor sound design. Maybe it&#8217;s just because I&#8217;ve watched a lot of <i>Treme</i>, but New Marais seems eerily quiet. There&#8217;s occasionally some traffic sounds and a little chatter, but for the most part you be running around listening to the wind blow and the crickets chirp. The voice work is also&#8230; interesting. The dialogue is written very conversationally and the voice actors mostly sound unlike anyone I&#8217;ve heard in games recently. This leads to some oddly human moments, which would be a great thing, except this is supposed to be a super hero game. Make it more over the top! Make it fun! Don&#8217;t just throw a bunch of bizarrely real, angsty arguments at me.</p>
<p>I did genuinely enjoy the story, however, despite it taking maybe a little too long to get where it needed to go. But the ending is pretty impressive, regardless if you get the good one or the evil one, and it genuinely provided me with more closure than I would have expected. <i>inFAMOUS </i>didn&#8217;t make the same jump in quality <i>Uncharted </i>did with it&#8217;s first sequel, but that&#8217;s more because the first <i>inFAMOUS </i>was better than the first <i>Uncharted</i>. I think they stand together as the best PlayStation-exclusive third person shooter franchises, and among the best in the industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=922</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>103</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Game of Life: Choose Your Destiny!</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=921</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=921#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 18:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Tree of Life How do you solve an enigma like Terrence Malick&#8217;s The Tree of Life? A film that at times is both beautiful and at other times incomprehensible. Though what can you expect from the J.D. Salinger of filmmakers? Arguably similar both in the mastery of their craft and their uncompromising reclusiveness. It&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:x-large;"><i>The Tree of Life</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-je330rAhpXg/TgJhGviKfnI/AAAAAAAACCg/rH6xwkSjB6c/s1600/Thetreeoflifeposter.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 204px; height: 320px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-je330rAhpXg/TgJhGviKfnI/AAAAAAAACCg/rH6xwkSjB6c/s320/Thetreeoflifeposter.jpg" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5621162053378670194" /></a>How do you solve an enigma like Terrence Malick&#8217;s <i>The Tree of Life</i>? A film that at times is both beautiful and at other times incomprehensible. Though what can you expect from the J.D. Salinger of filmmakers? Arguably similar both in the mastery of their craft and their uncompromising reclusiveness. It&#8217;s in that vein that we may never uncover precisely what Terrence Malick is trying to communicate here, but we can certainly make our own valued assumptions. For the most part it appears to be a coming of age film not just reflective of youth but of mankind and our place in the universe. Possibly it&#8217;s trying to visualize where we all stand in the universe and the importance of things like love in the overwhelmingly vast scheme of things. There are times when it can try your patience moving at a crippled snail&#8217;s pace, but there are other moments as well. Several times I saw some of the most awe inspiring visuals I&#8217;ve ever seen in a movie and for that I applaud this film.</p>
<p><i>Tree of Life</i> by it&#8217;s most basic definition is a movie about a typical blue collar family growing up in baby boomer era Texas. Brad Pitt is the family&#8217;s respectable but stern father and Jessica Chastain is the gentle and caring mother. Together the two attempt to raise their three boys as they experience all the triumphs and hardships of growing up. We see the boy&#8217;s; first steps, speaking, socializing, becoming dependent and even glimpses of rebellion that develops against their controlling and at times even abusive father. This is all intercut with the oldest son Jack as an adult in modern day (played by Sean Penn.) These sequences mostly entail a now disillusioned Jack aimlessly wandering through his own urban prison if you will, reminiscing about his childhood and occasional surreal imagery. Though for the most part <i>The Tree of Life</i> follows no real narrative, rather it speaks to us through visual symbolism and mostly religious themed narration regarding things like love and life.</p>
<p>One of the most stunning sequences of this almost avant-garde docudrama is where we watch the creation and evolution of planet Earth. Accomplished through the masterful effects work of Douglas Trumbull (<i>2001: A Space Odyssey</i>, <i>Blade Runner</i>) we are treated to visuals that are better than anything I&#8217;ve ever seen done with common CG. Which is why I wasn&#8217;t surprised to find that Trumbull managed to create most of this sequence without CG using; chemicals, paint, fluorescent dyes, smoke, liquids, CO2, flares, spin dishes, fluid dynamics, lighting and high speed photography. Words cannot describe the kind of breathtaking imagery that he creates, I think it&#8217;s time for Trumbull to get his first oscar.</p>
<p>The scope of <i>Tree of Life</i> is so overwhelmingly immense that I still can&#8217;t quite wrap my mind around it, which is why I&#8217;m going to have to cut this review short. To summarize my rambling, I&#8217;ll say that although <i>Tree of Life</i> can be dense and almost annoying with it&#8217;s lack of structure and lack of proper plotting, it&#8217;s a visual feast that is like no other and will perhaps live on as no other, at least until the next Terrence Malick film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=921</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>C.A.T: Another Green World</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=920</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=920#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brian Eno &#8211; Another Green World (1975) Seems like it was only a couple weeks back that I mentioned this album in my review for the latest Death Cab release, so it makes sense for me to give you my two cents on Brian Eno&#8217;s electro pop pioneering third album. Descending into stripped down, almost [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:x-large;">Brian Eno &#8211; <i>Another Green World (1975)</i></span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-17Y7cYN6LDg/TgI7AwY6eaI/AAAAAAAACCY/DlBxKI2-9u8/s1600/Another_Green_World.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 200px; height: 196px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-17Y7cYN6LDg/TgI7AwY6eaI/AAAAAAAACCY/DlBxKI2-9u8/s200/Another_Green_World.jpg" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5621120169087236514" /></a>Seems like it was only a couple weeks back that I mentioned this album in my review for the latest <i>Death Cab </i>release, so it makes sense for me to give you my two cents on Brian Eno&#8217;s electro pop pioneering third album. Descending into stripped down, almost robotic arrangements, Brian Eno dabbles with fresh ideas without compromising any of his accessibility as a solo artist. As a matter of fact many critics have noted <i>Another Green World</i> as his most accessible with poppy cuts like &#8220;St. Elmo&#8217;s Fire&#8221; and &#8220;I&#8217;ll Come Running&#8221;. Fewer tracks feature Eno&#8217;s very english vocal delivery but personally I favor most of the instrumental tracks over the ones with vocals.</p>
<p>Though the  bulk of <i>Another Green World</i> seems optimistic it certainly has it&#8217;s darker moments. &#8220;In Dark Tree&#8221; still gives me chills bordering on the lines of industrial, I&#8217;m sure Trent Reznor likes that track. Some tracks I can&#8217;t even describe, take the album opener for instance &#8220;Sky Saw&#8221; sounds like <i>Can</i> on some weird drug trip, but it&#8217;s nonetheless a trip I want to take as a listener. Eno goes to bold new places but he&#8217;s never dicking around or alienating his listeners. This is still a competent and organized album for eager listening audience.</p>
<p>The instrumental &#8220;The Big Ship&#8221; is easily my favorite track as it is without a doubt the most beautiful track on the album. It has that majestic keyboard progression that slowly builds and builds, accompanied by that great, choppy kind of percussion, I love it. Sometimes I wonder if this would&#8217;ve been a better album if it was just entirely instrumental, but even though some of the vocal tracks are a little cheesy sounding they really balance everything out. It&#8217;s hard for me to think of many albums that so seamlessly  blend instrumental and non-instrumental tracks, this one somehow pulls it off.</p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;The Big Ship&#8221;, &#8220;Golden Hours&#8221;, &#8220;In Dark Trees&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=920</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>113</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We&#8217;ll Always Have Paris</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=919</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=919#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 20:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Midnight In Paris I always love a good Woody Allen movie. &#160;But the quality of his output has been a little inconsistent in the last fifteen years or so, which has led to me seeing very few of his recent films. &#160;So when I saw the positive reviews for his latest film Midnight In Paris, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Midnight In Paris</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-d_X-G4SmMrg/Tf0PtS0JgRI/AAAAAAAABAA/TI_p4ftEYHA/s1600/midnight-in-paris-poster.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-d_X-G4SmMrg/Tf0PtS0JgRI/AAAAAAAABAA/TI_p4ftEYHA/s320/midnight-in-paris-poster.jpg" width="216" /></a>I always love a good Woody Allen movie. &nbsp;But the quality of his output has been a little inconsistent in the last fifteen years or so, which has led to me seeing very few of his recent films. &nbsp;So when I saw the positive reviews for his latest film <i>Midnight In Paris, </i>I figured I might as well try and see it. &nbsp;I mean it sure beats spending money on <i>The Green Lantern</i>.</p>
<p>From the one trailer I saw for <i>Midnight In Paris</i>, I get the impression that there was an attempt to keep the actual premise of this film under wraps, but I have no problem spoiling it since most of the people who read this blog have already seen the movie. &nbsp;Anyways, it follows Gil (Owen Wilson), a hack screenwriter with literary ambitions who is on vacation in Paris with his fiance Inez (Rachel McAdams). &nbsp;One night while walking the streets of Paris, the nostalgic Gil inadvertently takes a cab that transports him back to 1920&#8242;s Paris, in which he encounters Zelda and F. Scott Fitzgerald, Ernest Hemingway, Cole Porter, Pablo Picasso, and many other of the great artistic minds of the era.</p>
<p>Now from the plot, the most similar film in Woody&#8217;s catalogue would have to be 1985&#8242;s <i>The Purple Rose of Cairo</i>, another nostalgia-fueled film with a fantastical premise. &nbsp;And just like <i>Purple Rose</i>, <i>Midnight In Paris</i> really has a perfect blend of fantasy and comedy, along with plenty of Woody&#8217;s commentary on art, life, and relationships. &nbsp;It&#8217;s also another one of those films that is quite simply a love letter to Paris, past and present, and you get the idea that Woody has just as good a feel for Paris as he&#8217;s shown for New York in so many of his films (not that I&#8217;d really know, considering I&#8217;ve been to neither city).</p>
<p>Of course much of the film&#8217;s appeal is getting know all these great artists and writers of the &#8217;20s through the eyes of Owen Wilson&#8217;s character. &nbsp;These takes on these iconic figures are often quite funny, such as the way a machismo Ernest Hemingway speaks in terse, comma-fueled prose, or Salvador Dali&#8217;s obsession with rhinoceroses, but there&#8217;s still plenty of wisdom that the characters reveal in terms to Gil&#8217;s overall story of being caught in a loveless romance and an unfulfilling profession. &nbsp;All the performances are quite entertaining, though my only real quibble with the film is the one-dimensional quality of Rachel McAdams&#8217; character, who does little more than come off as a whiny shrew.</p>
<p>As much as I admire a more serious film like <i>Match Point</i>, which is probably Woody&#8217;s most acclaimed film in the past ten years or so, <i>Midnight In Paris</i>&nbsp;really is the kind of film that reminds me why I love Woody Allen. &nbsp;It&#8217;s got that fantastic light touch, with a perfect blend of comedy and profundity, and it just has a simple kind of magic to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=919</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>92</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>C.A.T.: Radio City</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=918</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=918#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 05:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=918</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Big Star &#8211; Radio City (1974) Sorry for the lapse in C.A.T&#8217;s, I guess I&#8217;ve just had a lack of enthusiasm about writing another one of these things, just as I&#8217;m sure everyone has a lack of enthusiasm towards reading them. &#160;Anyways, Big Star has always been one of my all-time favorite bands, so it&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Big Star &#8211; <i>Radio City </i>(1974)</span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-0mvDUc9Ya60/Tfg_SKs37aI/AAAAAAAAA_8/J_WEJzMQoGo/s1600/radiocity_7298.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="199" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-0mvDUc9Ya60/Tfg_SKs37aI/AAAAAAAAA_8/J_WEJzMQoGo/s200/radiocity_7298.jpg" width="200" /></a>Sorry for the lapse in C.A.T&#8217;s, I guess I&#8217;ve just had a lack of enthusiasm about writing another one of these things, just as I&#8217;m sure everyone has a lack of enthusiasm towards reading them. &nbsp;Anyways, Big Star has always been one of my all-time favorite bands, so it&#8217;s a little surprising that I haven&#8217;t gotten around to doing them for a CAT, but today that all changes. &nbsp;I&#8217;d probably say 1978&#8242;s <i>Third/Sister Lovers</i>&nbsp;stands as the band&#8217;s crowning achievement, but <i>Radio City</i> is still probably the best example of Big Star&#8217;s signature brand of sunny power-pop.</p>
<p>The first Big Star record was fueled by the songwriting team of Chris Bell and Alex Chilton, but prior to <i>Radio City</i>, Bell left the band with Chilton more or less taking over as the band&#8217;s leader. &nbsp;You can&#8217;t really feel Bell&#8217;s absence on the album, as it really just feels like a continuation of their debut, but the songs are just as good if not better. &nbsp;Everything is very upbeat and undeniably catchy, though there are certainly moments that hint at the slightly darker sound that Chilton would pursue on Third/Sister Lovers.</p>
<p>For some reason, Big Star always reminds me of my teenage years. &nbsp;I guess one obvious reason would be that I really got into the band while I was in high school, but it also has to do a lot with the breezy nostalgia Chilton evokes in these songs. &nbsp;Something like &#8220;Back Of A Car&#8221; pretty perfectly exudes those fleeting feelings of youth, while a song like &#8220;I&#8217;m In Love With A Girl&#8221; is such an unbelievably simple and naive take on love, and yet somehow Chilton makes it work magnificently. &nbsp;But I guess it was Big Star&#8217;s ability to boil down what makes a great pop song to its purest necessities that made them special. &nbsp;And I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s any more evident on&nbsp;<i>Radio City</i>&#8216;s high point &#8220;September Gurls&#8221;, another underrated gem that&#8217;s about as good as youth anthems get.</p>
<p><b>Favorite Albums:</b> &#8220;Life Is White&#8221;, &#8220;September Gurls&#8221;, &#8220;I&#8217;m In Love With A Girl&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=918</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eight is Enough</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=917</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=917#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Super 8 On May 2010 I was nestled in a crowd of many awaiting the latest Iron Man when a particular trailer of unknown origin appeared. This purposefully ambiguous trailer would of course be Super 8, JJ Abrams second stab at the secret viral marketing game. I like many had fallen into the web of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"> <i>Super 8</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-sA3N_erbFlE/TfabX0KQeRI/AAAAAAAACCQ/xGzrWsKRwps/s1600/Super%2B8%2BNew%2BPoster.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 216px; height: 320px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-sA3N_erbFlE/TfabX0KQeRI/AAAAAAAACCQ/xGzrWsKRwps/s320/Super%2B8%2BNew%2BPoster.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5617848418632235282" /></a>On May 2010 I was nestled in a  crowd of many awaiting the latest <i>Iron Man</i> when a particular trailer of unknown origin appeared. This purposefully ambiguous trailer would of course be <i>Super 8</i>, JJ Abrams second stab at the secret viral marketing game. I like many had fallen into the web of rumors that surrounded the Abrams&#8217; produced <i>Cloverfield</i>, so I could already tell I would be a victim to the hype of <i>Super 8</i>. Time passed and little information surfaced until it was more or less made official that this would be a sci-fi flick and that the monster would in fact be an alien. That&#8217;s all well and good but it was not until I was made aware of Spielberg&#8217;s importance and involvement that I really got excited. A nostalgic tribute to some of the greatest sci-fi/fantasy flicks ever forged? How could I not get excited, but deep inside I knew there was no movie that could ever fully satisfy my expectations.</p>
<p>Plain and simple, <i>Super 8</i> adds virtually nothing to this immensely popular genre, but just because something isn&#8217;t original doesn&#8217;t mean it has no entertainment value. <i>Super 8</i> is sure fire entertainment for the summer crowds, but little more than that. Tragically it fails to live up to the same kind of wonderment, soul and heart of such Spielberg classics as <i>E.T.</i> and <i>Close Encounters of the Third Kind</i>, but it definitely marks an effort. <i>Super 8</i> has a handful of top notch moments with a talented young cast and some exciting sequences, but the message is cliche and predictable with very few if any surprises. I went into this movie expecting to be taken on a wondrous ride of twists and turns, but was instead treated to a fairly formulaic film, a well made film but very formulaic. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s the summer of 1979 (made very clear by the film&#8217;s soundtrack) as we follow a young group of fledgling filmmakers trying to actualize their dream monster movie. Our central protagonist Joe (Joel Courtney) is a talented but shy makeup artist still quietly recovering from the unfortunate death of his mother, blamed on the carelessness of the town screwup Louis Dainard (Ron Eldard). Hoping to enter their film in a Cleveland film festival, the group invites the pretty yet slightly rebellious Alice Dainard (Elle Fanning) to be a part of their film. Butterflies are flapping all about inside a love struck Joe until the children&#8217;s project is quickly interrupted by a disastrous train incident. What builds from here is a series of puzzling questions, disasters, and other extraterrestrial phenomena that eventually falls into the hands of our young heroes and this is not a burden to be taken lightly. </p>
<p>So enough of that, let&#8217;s touch on the cast of characters, long story short their great. All the kids are likable, relatable, and wonderfully played by their respective actors. Standouts are easily Elle Fanning as Joe&#8217;s crush Alice and Riley Griffiths as the gang&#8217;s temperamental perfectionist director Charles. Though really all the kids have their moments with some equally entertaining adult actors as well. Kyle Chandler as Joe&#8217;s father the deputy has that great kind of expression that can effortlessly transition from soft to stern, though unfortunately most of his screen time is relegated to commands with an unfortunate lack of personal moments. Which reminds me, what exactly is the emotional core of this film?</p>
<p>Without spooling anything it seems to be a film about learning to let go. Though an even more pressing matter that seems to be brushed over is the rift between Joe and his dad. Here we can see a father and son torn apart by tragedy only to be brought together by what, an alien attack? There&#8217;s nothing shown in this sequence of events to show that the father will act any different to his son in all the aftermath. Of course they hug and and embrace and apologize and all that sentimental stuff, but were never really shown that this stern father has learned anything. Maybe he learns to forgive the man who he blamed for his wife&#8217;s death, but with the lack of  dialogue between him and his son and the lack of an epilogue, I really don&#8217;t know where they stand. Basically that&#8217;s a key plot element that left me unfulfilled, but I have a few comments geared towards the alien as well. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s pretty hard to show audiences anything new, so there was pretty much nothing Abrams could&#8217;ve done to surprise us with the final reveal of the alien, but maybe that&#8217;s just the thing. Maybe there is something he could&#8217;ve done to take us by surprise but none of us know what it is, after all if we knew what that thing was then it wouldn&#8217;t be surprising. Though I really wish there could of been something unexpected in <i>Super 8</i>, I mean why make it if you can&#8217;t think of anything new? That&#8217;s a little harsh but I think there&#8217;s a lot of truth to that. So what we are given is a fairly conventional alien plot with a less than spectacular alien. I didn&#8217;t mind Abram&#8217;s Cloverfield monster so much but this thing doesn&#8217;t really look like anything. It really does look like they just went with the first doodle they could think of and then called it a day. I&#8217;m still not sure what exactly I was even looking at, was it a muscular bug? It certainly had a lot of limbs and I could swear I saw a tentacle one time. You see they should of done one of two things; 1. they could of made it as simple as possible with merely one unique feature (like E.T. and his extendable neck) or 2. the look of the monster could of somehow been referential to a previous detail in the movie, so people could understand the relevance of it&#8217;s features within the context of the film. Ok, so that second option is a little vague, but at least I&#8217;m trying to justify the alien&#8217;s appearance and that&#8217;s more than they did. </p>
<p>Though in the grand scheme of everything what&#8217;s my main beef with <i>Super 8</i>? Not that it&#8217;s not a good movie, just that it&#8217;s not as good as it should&#8217;ve of been. With the quality of the personnel involved and the exciting concept, this movie should&#8217;ve made more of an effort to make it&#8217;s presence known. Aside from the delightful idea of aspiring filmmakers it has not a single original bone in it&#8217;s body and that disappoints me. I appreciate that Abrams is making the kind of  film&#8217;s he&#8217;d like to see rather then what Hollywood demands, but he&#8217;s really got to go that extra mile if he wants to make his mark on the genre.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=917</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The War Story Quiz</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=916</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=916#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 19:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With such a great post week going why stop now? So here&#8217;s the official War Story quiz that I&#8217;d always mused about making. I&#8217;d say the difficulty is fair if you&#8217;ve seen all 11 episodes. Don&#8217;t feel bad if you can&#8217;t 100% it, I bet Paul couldn&#8217;t even get 100%.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With such a great post week going why stop now? So here&#8217;s the official <i>War Story</i> quiz that I&#8217;d always mused about making. I&#8217;d say the difficulty is fair if you&#8217;ve seen all 11 episodes. Don&#8217;t feel bad if you can&#8217;t 100% it, I bet Paul couldn&#8217;t even get 100%.</p>
<p><iframe frameborder="0" height="501" id="proprofs" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0" name="proprofs" src="http://www.proprofs.com/quiz-school/widget/v3/?id=241801&amp;bgcolor=ffffff&amp;fcolor=000000&amp;tcolor=000000&amp;w=420&amp;h=295&amp;ff=1&amp;fs=large&amp;pplink=1&amp;socialmedia=0&amp;embedlink=1&amp;showpage=1&amp;btncolor=000000" width="440"></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=916</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>E3 2011</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=915</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=915#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 10:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=915</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Electronic Entertainment Expo has come and gone once again. The convention is always a mess to cover for the organizations who actually have people there, for a civilian like myself, it&#8217;s damn near impossible. So I&#8217;ll just tell you about what I&#8217;ve gleamed so far. The biggest news of the show was the announcement [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-plt3YQDmxws/TfHv4ZOZIDI/AAAAAAAABCk/yvoAA-mZThc/s1600/Wii_u.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-plt3YQDmxws/TfHv4ZOZIDI/AAAAAAAABCk/yvoAA-mZThc/s200/Wii_u.jpg" width="175" /></a></div>
<p>The Electronic Entertainment Expo has come and gone once again. The convention is always a mess to cover for the organizations who actually have people there, for a civilian like myself, it&#8217;s damn near impossible. So I&#8217;ll just tell you about what I&#8217;ve gleamed so far.</p>
<p>The biggest news of the show was the announcement of the Wii U, Nintendo&#8217;s Wii successor. They said they would be debuting the console at E3 a while ago, and most of the rumors surrounding the new system seem to be true. It is an HD system, probably more powerful than the PS3 and 360. It works with Wii games and all Wii peripherals. Additionally, the console will work with one new controller which everyone is calling the WiiPad. It basically brings DS functionality to home entertainment, giving you a big touch screen as well as all the necessary buttons. The screen has all sorts of sensors, including one for WiiMotes, so you could, for example, set the WiiPad on the floor and swing a WiiMote over it to simulate hitting a golf ball off a tee. It seems pretty cool but it&#8217;s obviously still very far off, as Nintendo didn&#8217;t have any real games to show. Also, Wii U is the worst name since Wii.</p>
<p>Sony also has a new system coming out this year, the NGP, which has been renamed PlayStation Vita. Vita games look a lot like console games so far, which is probably what Sony is going for. The biggest bombshell on this front was that the base model of the Vita would cost $250, the same price as the 3DS, which has not been doing amazingly well. Sony must think they&#8217;ve got a real shot at taking a chunk of the handheld market and I don&#8217;t blame them. Of course, the Vita will also have functionality with PS3s, so it will be interesting if Sony tries to get a head start on Wii U-style gaming before Nintendo gets their new system out.</p>
<p>The game everyone&#8217;s talking about is <i>Bioshock Infinite</i>, of which we still only have gotten to see choice segments. I&#8217;d really like to see how the game plays, but it obviously is going to be extraordinary. I remember the hype for the first <i>Bioshock </i>being pretty crazy, but this sequel has taken that into the stratosphere. It&#8217;s a shame it&#8217;s so far off.</p>
<p>Bioware seems to be having a strong show, showing off a bunch of <i>Mass Effect 3 </i>and <i>Star Wars The Old Republic</i>, probably the two games I&#8217;m looking forward to the most right now. What they showed of <i>Mass Effect 3 </i>makes the shooter gameplay look better than ever. I&#8217;m not sure how I feel about the OmniTool being a weapon, but whatever. <i>TOR </i>is looking great too, the GUI has been drastically improved since the last time they showed it and the game looks pretty good. They say they&#8217;re hoping to get it out this year. My biggest concern is that the combat doesn&#8217;t look that interesting yet, especially compared to a <i>Dragon Age II. </i>But we&#8217;ve seen so little of these two games it&#8217;s still hard to tell.</p>
<p>Ubisoft showed off the new <i>Assassin&#8217;s Creed</i> game, I think it&#8217;s subtitle is <i>Revelations</i>. It looks cool, but I&#8217;m worried it&#8217;s a little worn out. I mean, Ezio looks old as hell. When I played <i>Assassin&#8217;s Creed II</i>, I had no idea we&#8217;d be getting two more Ezio games, and that worries me a little. But then I remember that <i>Brotherhood </i>was great and probably shouldn&#8217;t worry.</p>
<p>We got to see some more <i>Uncharted 3: Drake&#8217;s Deception </i>and God damn, that game looks great. I don&#8217;t think I really need to belabor this point.</p>
<p>Now that Bungie has left the <i>Halo </i>franchise we&#8217;re getting a bunch of new <i>Halo </i>games. For starters, the original <i>Halo </i>is being rereleased. What&#8217;s cool about that is that the game runs on the original engine and you can even turn off the new graphics and play with the original ones. So I&#8217;m guessing that means unlimited grenades and all that goodness is back. Also, there&#8217;s going to be a <i>Halo 4</i>, which will start a whole new trilogy of games. That&#8217;s about all we know about that one, though.</p>
<p>The big pushes are still towards 3D, PlayStation Move, Kinect and the 3DS, none of which I own. There are also plenty of great games out there worth you investigating, I just touched on the biggest games that mean the most to me. For example, <i>Modern Warfare 3</i>, <i>Battlefield 3</i>, and <i>Far Cry 3</i> all made a big splash at the show. So go to a real website and find out what&#8217;s going on in the world of games!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=915</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>104</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>T3: Fictional Presidents</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=914</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=914#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 06:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Ten]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=914</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a little thing I was thinking about after learning that Jack Ryan becomes the president eventually in those Tom Clancy books. Who is your favorite fictional president? I bet you can guess mine. 10. Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho &#8211; IdiocracyHere is a president who we can all admire. President Camacho cares about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a little thing I was thinking about after learning that Jack Ryan becomes the president eventually in those Tom Clancy books. Who is your favorite fictional president? I bet you can guess mine.</p>
<p><img border="0" height="179" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-88b_gfQFBTc/TfGktSXE4ZI/AAAAAAAABB8/tOdZlTvx8H8/s320/1181537162_idiocracy5.jpg" width="430" /><br /><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">10. Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho &#8211; <i>Idiocracy</i></span><br />Here is a president who we can all admire. President Camacho cares about the people. He wants everyone to have a good time. He also thinks plants should be watered with Gatorade. Maybe he&#8217;s not a super genius, but he lives in a world where no one is smart. He gets by on charisma and his idea that everything should be fun. That&#8217;s pretty cool. Hell, if we lived in the <i>Idiocracy </i>universe, I&#8217;d vote for the guy.</p>
<p><img border="0" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-0pYGVWjU-38/TfGohAPWfaI/AAAAAAAABCA/vbiLNCn7MbQ/s1600/baltar.png" /><br /><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">9. Gaius Baltar &#8211; <i>Battlestar Galactica</i></span><br />Gaius Baltar was partly responsible for most of humanity dying in a horrific attack by evil robots. While it wasn&#8217;t directly his fault, he did a great job of self-preservation that continued to put good people in danger. Plus he takes orders from a woman who only exists in his head. But that didn&#8217;t stop him from saying whatever the people wanted to hear and getting elected. What did he do with his presidency? It looks like he mainly slept with beautiful women, then surrendered to the Cylons. That&#8217;s pretty pathetic, but kind of awesome too, don&#8217;t you think?</p>
<p><img border="0" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-3X1vwrOX8aE/TfGo6hQA6GI/AAAAAAAABCE/kAv99LyaGpg/s1600/gal_celeb_pres_nicholson.jpg" width="430" /><br /><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">8. James Dale &#8211; <i>Mars Attacks!</i></span><br />President Dale had no real effect on the events of <i>Mars Attacks!</i> &#8211; he mainly just delivered jokes. Which was fine with me, since most of them were pretty funny. Jack Nicholson makes for a pretty good president, especially in a world as crazy as the one in this movie. I love his portrayal of a man who is mostly just a politician, not the idealistic leader we get with most fictional presidents. Plus, he delivers on a promise <i>the Simpsons </i>made of showing us the president impaled by a flag.</p>
<p><img border="0" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-l--sFCYc7bQ/TfGpOQHiUTI/AAAAAAAABCI/ahdRX8c82Vs/s1600/morgan-freeman-deep-impact.jpg" width="430" /><br /><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">7. Tom Beck &#8211; <i>Deep Impact</i></span><br />So there&#8217;s this asteroid headed for the earth. It&#8217;s going to kill everybody, except for the select few who get to stay in a special shelter. Everyone else gets to die in a terrible firestorm. It takes quite the president to make that seem noble, and fortunately President Beck was that guy. His speech at the end of <i>Deep Impact </i>was sombre and yet rousing, reflective and optimistic. Plus he paved the way for future great African American presidents.</p>
<p><img border="0" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-X4HuMUMv5Vs/TfGqQiZUOiI/AAAAAAAABCM/Qwxb005S9hE/s1600/kevin-kline-as-dave.jpg" width="430" /><br /><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">6. Dave Kovic &#8211; <i>Dave</i></span><br />When President Bill Mitchell has a stroke, it falls to Dave Kovic, who runs an employment agency and works on the side as a Mitchell-lookalike, to run the country. Dave flounders at first, but then single-handedly balances the national budget, vastly improves his popularity with voters and even reinvigorates his romance with the First Lady. It&#8217;s these kind of down-to-earth values and fiscal responsibility that most Americans look for in a president, and proof why we&#8217;d never actually get one like him.</p>
<p><img border="0" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-qUI6sDmTrIw/TfGqoo0VD4I/AAAAAAAABCQ/yu71V8WS9FI/s1600/president-andrew-shepherd.jpg" width="430" /><br /><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">5. Andrew Shepherd &#8211; <i>The American President</i></span><br />President Shepherd is kind of the prototype for Jed Bartlet, in that he is a popular, liberal president who must deal with a conservative congress. In the beginning of the film, Shepherd is a widower and clearly has lost the drive that got him elected in the first place. Thanks to falling in love, however, by the end of the movie he is delivering terrific speeches and leading the country in the direction everyone wants it to go. I think the &#8220;least presidential thing I&#8217;ve ever done&#8221; speech is what clenches it for me.</p>
<p><img border="0" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Nfa3jnx21gc/TfGrZmyzzlI/AAAAAAAABCU/v8dDhwXfiAs/s320/billpullman.png" width="430" /><br /><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">4. Thomas J. Whitmore &#8211; <i>Independence Day</i></span><br />When you think about it, Whitmore was kind of a shitty president. He didn&#8217;t seem to really know what was going on, nor did he take the right advice when he should have. He didn&#8217;t even know Area 51 existed, the fool! Then, when the country needed his leadership most, he stepped up and gave a rousing speech about how Independence Day was now an international holiday. Then he hopped in a plane and lead the charge himself. How about that?</p>
<p><img border="0" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-L9eqMC4bsYE/TfGr1QkFXRI/AAAAAAAABCY/rdYe_l6Eu68/s1600/airforceone-punchout.jpg" width="430" /><br /><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">3. James Marshall &#8211; <i>Air Force One</i></span><br />Now here is a president whose administration we know nothing about. We don&#8217;t need to know anything about it, either. All we need to know is that in a world full of pathetic, sniveling bureaucrats, President Marshall is a guy who takes things into his own hands. Instead of escaping Air Force One when it is taken over by terrorists, this guy jettisons the pod and starts taking out terrorists one at a time. &#8220;Get off my plane,&#8221; he says. That&#8217;s right up there with &#8220;Ask not what you can do for country&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p><img border="0" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-nMO5uE46IRg/TfGujOklU1I/AAAAAAAABCc/ogCFx7Ob5G4/s320/palmer.png" width="430" /><br /><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">2. David Palmer &#8211; <i>24</i></span><br />We don&#8217;t really know that much about the Palmer presidency. We know he was very popular and the first African American elected to that office. But what his domestic policies were like is anyone&#8217;s guess. What we do know is that the man was an amazing decision maker and extremely capable under pressure. He became the go-to guy for dealing with terrorism in the United States. With Palmer calling the shots and Jack Bauer on the front lines, America was never safer. In fact, Palmer was such a beloved TV president, some people attribute part of President Obama&#8217;s success to the character.</p>
<p><img border="0" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-axYBtCdC1uo/TfGumQ88w9I/AAAAAAAABCg/Kp9OVwAQ4Hc/s320/scr1.png" width="430" /><br /><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">1. Josiah Bartlet &#8211; <i>The West Wing</i></span><br /><i>The West Wing </i>gave us two full terms of Bartlet, and man, I wish we could have given that guy a third one. Bartlet is liberal, but he is also deeply religious and resolute. He didn&#8217;t serve in the military, but he capably uses force when necessary. He is among the most intelligent and eloquent characters I&#8217;ve ever seen. In eight seasons, he reinvigorated the Supreme Court, made peace in the Middle East, helped make college more affordable and raised the level of political discourse. Jed Bartlet is the real deal, I mean, he can even speak Latin! Four more years!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=914</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>01010100011100100110111101101110</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=913</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=913#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 00:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tron: Legacy Ever looked at a computer motherboard?&#160; It’s neat how all the conductors, circuits, wiring, and batteries all come together to such a beautiful array.&#160; Oh and the forest green tint of the board itself, not even fire engine red is that attractive.&#160; All in all, computer hardware looks pretty nifty.&#160; Tron: Legacy is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><i>Tron: Legacy</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/2.5.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>
<div class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-fP5iZxR3iI4/TfAZ50NOV-I/AAAAAAAAAN8/xb6wWAaLA0M/s1600/tron+legacy.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="180" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-fP5iZxR3iI4/TfAZ50NOV-I/AAAAAAAAAN8/xb6wWAaLA0M/s400/tron+legacy.jpg" width="400" /></a>Ever looked at a computer motherboard?&nbsp; It’s neat how all the conductors, circuits, wiring, and batteries all come together to such a beautiful array.&nbsp; Oh and the forest green tint of the board itself, not even fire engine red is that attractive.&nbsp; All in all, computer hardware looks pretty nifty.&nbsp; <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Tron: Legacy</i> is very similar to computer hardware, it looks cool, but, the average blog reader doesn’t know how all the components come together or what’s really going on.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal"></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">As I begin to squire on about this movie, I mine as well explain the title: it’s “Tron” in binary code.&nbsp; The original film came out quite some time ago, like 29 years.&nbsp; Jeff Bridges starred as some computer programmer dude who invented some system and then this company called Encom stole it from him and he needed to become digital to prove that he was the one who invented it in the first place.&nbsp; At least, that is what Wikipedia tells me.&nbsp; <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Tron: Legacy</i> takes place years after the original. &nbsp;The son of Jeff Bridges ends up in the computer and needs to battle his father who he also has teamed up with.&nbsp; That’s right, this movie has two Jeff Bridges; one the original that has been stuck in the computer deemed a ‘user’ (protagonist), the other an evil set of software that is trying to take over the mainframe (antagonist).&nbsp; The movie follows Jeff Bridges and his son, we’ll call him exhibit A, battling Jeff Bridges and his goons (software).&nbsp; A note of caution, the plot makes no sense; all I could tell is that Jeff Bridges battles himself.&nbsp; Really, that is it; maybe I should have watched the&nbsp;</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">first Tron before seeing the sequel.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal"></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">As I eluded with the computer simile, the only goal a person seeing <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Tron: Legacy</i> is to enjoy all the special effects and battle scenes, not the plot.&nbsp; Kind of opposite of <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">The Notebook</i>.&nbsp; However, even on the graphic front, the film doesn’t do well.&nbsp; It is shot using ‘Real 3d” which at this point I have decided as a scam.&nbsp; This technology makes us, the money machine, wear stupid and uncomfortable polarized glasses for hours, when the added ‘3d feel’ does nothing for the movie. Most of the scenes didn’t even seem like they were in 3d, just really clear 2d.&nbsp; All recent film shot in 3d I deem unworthy and a nuisance to imax 3d.&nbsp; Want to see what excellent 3d technology is?&nbsp; Find Beowulf playing in Imax 3d somewhere, that is incredible.&nbsp; Back to Tron, despite a pitiful attempt at 3d, the film provides a few visually pleasing scenes and it is interesting to see how a few guys depicted what the inside of computer software looks like.&nbsp; Go out and see Tron if you want an action movie with some cool visual effects, but stop there.&nbsp; Don’t expect a good story: especially if you haven’t seen the first Tron. &nbsp;<o:p></o:p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=913</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Family Circuital</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=912</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=912#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 12:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My Morning Jacket &#8211; Circuital How is it we&#8217;ve only had six My Morning Jacket albums? They&#8217;ve gone so far, I&#8217;m amazed this is that same band that put out their first few albums. And of course, they aren&#8217;t. Band members have come and gone and the group&#8217;s ambitions have grown out of control. Circuital [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">My Morning Jacket &#8211; <i>Circuital</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-ZzxV5LYRqFA/Te9kjWce41I/AAAAAAAABB4/8sp1WdG6M4I/s1600/Circuitalmmj.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-ZzxV5LYRqFA/Te9kjWce41I/AAAAAAAABB4/8sp1WdG6M4I/s200/Circuitalmmj.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<p>How is it we&#8217;ve only had six My Morning Jacket albums? They&#8217;ve gone so far, I&#8217;m amazed this is that same band that put out their first few albums. And of course, they aren&#8217;t. Band members have come and gone and the group&#8217;s ambitions have grown out of control. <i>Circuital </i>sees My Morning Jacket pushing on with what they were trying with <i>Evil Urges</i>, that is to say an attempt to make all kinds of music at the same time.</p>
<p>While I miss the obvious rockers of days past (there&#8217;s no &#8220;I&#8217;m Amazed&#8221; this time) <i>Circuital </i>is better for it. It is a more consistent album that gives the band room for their lofty ambitions. And their lofty sound too. Everything sounds pretty big on this album, like it was recorded on some sprawling stage, which helps with a group that is known for their live shows. For the &#8220;Highly Suspicious&#8221; crowd, you&#8217;ll be happy to know the band&#8217;s sense of humor is still present, although no lyric is as ridiculous as &#8220;peanut butter pudding surprise.&#8221;</p>
<p>It takes a while to process a new My Morning Jacket album. My favorite <i>Evil Urges </i>tracks didn&#8217;t even really stand out to me until months after I picked it up. What can I say with certainty? It&#8217;s not a bad album by any stretch. I really wish I could hear it live, watching the recent Jimmy Fallon performances had made that clear. This isn&#8217;t the band I fell in love with when I listened to <i>At Dawn </i>watching a Seattle morning from a train. They&#8217;ve gone so much further since then. And at the same time, they&#8217;re everything I loved about them that first time. I guess things just come around like that.</p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks: </b>&#8220;Circuital,&#8221; &#8220;Outta My System,&#8221; &#8220;Holdin&#8217; On to Black Metal&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=912</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Antlers in My Pantlers</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=911</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=911#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 11:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Antlers &#8211; Burst Apart Fleet Foxes&#8217; reign as my go to album was cut tragically short by a series of late-May releases. You&#8217;ve already heard about the latest from Death Cab and we&#8217;ll be talking about My Morning Jacket soon enough, for now, let&#8217;s take a moment to talk about Burst Apart, the latest [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">The Antlers &#8211; <i>Burst Apart</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.5.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-CKJwqtZoSmk/Te9fUpKuJaI/AAAAAAAABB0/vk_bTlQpx0M/s1600/antlers-burst-apart1.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-CKJwqtZoSmk/Te9fUpKuJaI/AAAAAAAABB0/vk_bTlQpx0M/s200/antlers-burst-apart1.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<p>Fleet Foxes&#8217; reign as my go to album was cut tragically short by a series of late-May releases. You&#8217;ve already heard about the latest from Death Cab and we&#8217;ll be talking about My Morning Jacket soon enough, for now, let&#8217;s take a moment to talk about <i>Burst Apart</i>, the latest from the Antlers.</p>
<p>2009&#8242;s <i>Hospice </i>was an amazing album, in fact it was among my top ten for the whole year. But it was easily the most depressing album on that list. <i>Burst Apart</i> is not quite so heavy, weighing down on you more like the way maybe a Radiohead album would. Which is a pleasant change of pace considering the last album was about cancer, impotence and unwanted pregnancy.</p>
<p>The Radiohead comparison is particularly apt, as this latest release definitely has been influenced by the post-<i>O.K. Computer </i>band. I don&#8217;t know how you could listen to a song like &#8220;Parentheses&#8221; and not think so. But this is not mere emulation, the album is unmistakably Antlers and everything that I liked about <i>Hospice </i>is still present. Just more evolved.</p>
<p>I beg you guys take a look at this one. Listen to &#8220;Every Night My Teeth are Falling Out,&#8221; probably my favorite track of the whole album. If you like it, imagine getting ten times that. That what&#8217;s <i>Burst Apart </i>is; a truly consistent and terrific album. It&#8217;s one of those great collections of songs that just washes over you. Right now, this is my favorite album of the year.</p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks: </b>&#8220;I Don&#8217;t Want Love,&#8221; &#8220;Every Night My Teeth are Falling Out,&#8221; &#8220;Putting the Dog to Sleep&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=911</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Highly Devolved</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=910</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=910#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 23:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Vines &#8211; Future Primitive There are few bands that I&#8217;ve once liked and then just plain given up on. Jet, once one of my favorite groups have been on the fast track to &#8220;I don&#8217;t give a shit city&#8221; along with Kings of Leon who now look like a bunch of bored GAP models. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">The Vines &#8211; <i>Future Primitive</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/1.5.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-BEDjCj1TlEQ/Te6_DnHXPEI/AAAAAAAACCI/EDSBQfAH3Y4/s1600/Future_Primitive.png"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 200px; height: 198px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-BEDjCj1TlEQ/Te6_DnHXPEI/AAAAAAAACCI/EDSBQfAH3Y4/s200/Future_Primitive.png" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5615635854137965634" /></a>There are few bands that I&#8217;ve once liked and then just plain given up on. <i>Jet</i>, once one of my favorite groups have been on the fast track to &#8220;I don&#8217;t give a shit city&#8221; along with <i>Kings of Leon</i> who now look like a bunch of bored GAP models. <i>Rooney</i> is the only band that immediately comes to mind that I completely gave up on. I loved their debut but never finished their subpar sophomore release and I just can&#8217;t support a band that tours in support of Fergie and the Jonas Brothers. </p>
<p><i>The Vines</i> are barely hanging in there but I don&#8217;t why I haven&#8217;t just cut &#8216;em loose. I guess it&#8217;s because I loved <i>Winning Days</i>, so much so that I still pray they&#8217;ll someday reignite the spark they once had. It&#8217;s as if ever since founding bassist Patrick Matthews left everything has been going down hill, maybe he was smart to get out when he did. Where <i>The Vines&#8217;</i> music should be maturing on their fifth album it&#8217;s somehow doing the exact opposite. This once exciting band has entered a downward spiral of devolution where the songs are getting shorter, simpler, and tragically less inspired. If they&#8217;d started out sounding like this I don&#8217;t think they ever would have received a recording contract, but for some unknown reason they just keeping pumping out the same old lazy shit.</p>
<p>What happened to the Craig Nicholls that would shout &#8220;Fuck the world!&#8221; at the top of his lungs while flailing all over the place and having a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xBKm966ACdQ">mental breakdown on Letterman</a>. Not that I miss his annoying recklessness as a performer but I miss the manic edge he once carried with him into the studio. Nicholl&#8217;s energy on the first two albums felt raw and real but now when he tries to act crazy it just feels phony. Maybe it&#8217;s because he&#8217;s mellowed out, less drugs? I don&#8217;t know but his music has suffered and if this is the road the band is going to continue down maybe they should just hang it up.</p>
<p>What else is there to say? The songs are boring and sound like Nicholl&#8217;s crapped them all out in about ten minutes. The production is quite good but I crave for more substance, something to sink my teeth into. I remember being mildly disappointed with <i>The Vines</i> third album but compared to this that album was great. At this point I&#8217;d say chances are good I won&#8217;t be reviewing this band&#8217;s next album. </p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> None&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=910</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sex Men: First Ass</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=909</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=909#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 18:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=909</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[X-Men: First Class (Spoilers Ahead)You see what I did there with the title? Eh, you like that? Just like a porno huh? So how exactly does a Joe Pinchpenny like myself end up seeing a movie called X-Men: First Class anyways? Well for starters, I love the X-Men. It&#8217;s the first comic series I ever [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"> <i>X-Men: First Class</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-fG3n__Tvq_Q/Te50cDXIjBI/AAAAAAAACCA/0tp73RO92jk/s1600/X-MenFirstClassMoviePoster.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 217px; height: 320px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-fG3n__Tvq_Q/Te50cDXIjBI/AAAAAAAACCA/0tp73RO92jk/s320/X-MenFirstClassMoviePoster.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5615553810665081874" /></a><b>(Spoilers Ahead)</b><br />You see what I did there with the title? Eh, you like that? Just like a porno huh? So how exactly does a Joe Pinchpenny like myself end up seeing a movie called <i>X-Men: First Class</i> anyways? Well for starters, I love the X-Men. It&#8217;s the first comic series I ever really fell in love with (mostly the early 80s series/Kitty Pryde years) so they certainly have a place very close to my heart. Secondly, I&#8217;ve already seen just about every other Marvel Movie ever made so why stop now?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not really sure how your average non-comic book reading moviegoer would respond to the <i>X-Men</i> film series as whole, but for myself it&#8217;s been a complete canonical/chronological nightmare. I mean I like the first two, hell I even liked the overblown third installment, but now with all these prequels thrown into the mix this series has more or less become a big middle finger to the canon of the comic series. Even if there wasn&#8217;t a comic series and it was just these movies, they&#8217;re simply getting harder and harder to connect as a continuos franchise. Though  before I jump into a nerdy nitpicking rage, let me tell you that from a casual filmgoing mindset, this is a mindless but entertaining summer romp. As an adaptation of a legendary comic series, this movie is a complete mess.</p>
<p>So it all starts off with a flashback to a 1940s war-torn Poland where we once again see a young Erik &#8220;Magneto&#8221; Lensherr being separated from his parents by nazi soliders. I say once again because this is exactly how the first film started. Yes even down to Magneto bending the gates, seriously? I mean they couldn&#8217;t think of anything else? They all ready fucking did that! Meanwhile we see a much better off Charles Xavier as he meets a young Mystique after she&#8217;s broken into his childhood mansion. So Charles and Mystique met as kids by a complete coincidence? Since when was Mystique the same age as Charles? They explain later that her power makes her age slower, but I think that&#8217;s just a bunch of shit they pulled out of their ass. Face it, they just needed as many recognizable characters as they could think of. Later we cut back to a young Magneto being tormented by Nazi Kevin Bacon to show off his mutant abilities with little success, this leads to the unfortunate execution of Magneto&#8217;s mum, damn you Kevin Bacon! Not only is he guilty of being a jerk but he really hams it up&#8230; Did I just say Kevin &#8220;Bacon&#8221;, &#8220;Hams&#8221; it up? Is anyone getting hungry?</p>
<p>Skipping ahead to the film&#8217;s modern setting of 1962, we are introduced to CIA agent Moira McTaggert (Rose Byrne) investigating the mysterious Hellfire Club in Vegas. Though if my memory serves me right Moira MacTaggert was not only NOT a CIA agent in the comics but in fact a Scottish scientist who studied genetic mutation to aid mutants. So she infiltrates the club to not only discover the Hellfire Club (led by Kevin Bacon under the name of Sebastian Shaw)  are organizing a devious plan with those pesky Russkies,  but that the Hellfire Club are also mutants which most people are unaware of at this time.</p>
<p>&#8220;Wait a minute, my nerd sense is tingling?&#8221; I&#8217;m fairly familiar with Sebastian Shaw and the Hellfire Club in the comics and I don&#8217;t recall Shaw ever being a former Nazi who could control his own aging. Maybe you can justify the aging thing seeing that Shaw could control energy, but a Nazi? And the Hellfire Club were really more of a cultish secret society than a a group of Bond villain wannabes. Their shtick was more geared towards dressing up like Victorian douchebags and using their elite connections to influence the world around them. Not to mention this movie only managed to get two actual Hellfire club members right in Shaw and the White Queen (January Jones). I mean I wasn&#8217;t expecting to see Mastermind (even though he&#8217;s arguably their most interesting member) as they already had a similar character in <i>X2</i>, remember Stryker&#8217;s son? That guy was more or less based off of Mastermind. So instead we get Shaw, White Queen aka Emma Frost, some guy who creates tornados who I&#8217;m not familiar with, and Nightcrawler&#8217;s dad? That&#8217;s the best they could come up with? Have they ever actually read an <i>X-Men</i> comic?</p>
<p>So to better understand these &#8220;mutants&#8221; MacTaggert is sent to Oxford to meet Charles Xavier: the leading expert in mutation… Even though he&#8217;s just graduated from College. Not long after they meet, MacTaggert discovers that Charles and Mystique (who&#8217;s been bumming around England with Charles) are in fact also mutants, so they all decide to work together to stop the Hellfire Club. Meanwhile Magneto has been killing old nazi dudes until his path eventually crosses with Charles in the middle of a scuffle between the Hellfire club and the CIA (naturally Magneto is seeking revenge on Shaw.) Charles invites Magneto to join him and after he reluctantly accepts they start putting together a squad. So they use Cerebro, ya know, that giant computer thing in the other X-Men movies (except  now it&#8217;s been built by a pre-blue haired Hank &#8220;Beast&#8221; McCoy and Agent Oliver Platt) to track down other mutants. This leads to an across the globe mutant finding montage that even includes a cameo from Hugh &#8220;Wolverine&#8221; Jackman where he drops the F-bomb… Easily the best scene in the whole movie, I love Hugh Jackman.</p>
<p>The team is eventually assembled and our new X-Men are!!! (Drum Roll) Banshee, except he&#8217;s no longer Irish even though that was basically the most important thing about his character in the comics. I mean where do Banshees even come from? Irish mythology!!! God damn it, what does this movie have against Celtic culture? Then they have Havok who was Cyclops&#8217; little brother in the comics, so I&#8217;m not even going to attempt to comprehend that mess. There&#8217;s Beast, probably the only decision that makes sense; Charles, Magneto, Mystique and then two other bullshit characters I&#8217;ve never heard of; evolving black guy and bug lady. I have little to no interest in learning about any post 90s X-Men characters.</p>
<p>So the characters all mingle and despite the fact that practically none of them should be in the same movie together, they&#8217;re all fairly likable and ably performed by their respective actors. This is also probably the first time I&#8217;ve ever liked James Macavoy and Michael Fassbender certainly has a powerful screen presence, though this Magneto is a total, unlikable, prick. Remember Ian McKellen&#8217;s Magneto? There was a charmer with some class, I simply cannot believe this brutish prick becomes that classy Shakespearian supervillian. Back to the Hellfire Club we&#8217;ve discovered that Shaw has created a helmet so that Charles can no longer read his mind. Yes, this is the helmet Magneto will later don, I&#8217;m pretty sure it wasn&#8217;t Shaw that created it but what, now I&#8217;m talking about the origin of a helmet? Anyways, he takes his club along with his fancy new helmet and heads down to CIA headquarters to start a little mischief.</p>
<p>The new or first X-Men squad is still hanging out around the CIA when the Hellfire club attacks and attack they do! Shaw, Tornado guy, and Nightcrawler&#8217;s dad basically kill every single agent at the CIA (Oliver Platt included) in an attempt to reach the X-Men and hopefully recruit them. When they finally reach them they actually manage to convince bug lady (also Lenny Kravitz daughter) to join them and then kill evolving black guy. I was like &#8220;Hell yeah!&#8221; cause they just managed to limit the screen time of the two least legitimate X-Men characters in just once scene, but poor X-men cause they&#8217;re all sad now.</p>
<p>With tensions rising in the US and the Russians/Hellfire Club&#8217;s nuclear attack imminent (The Hellfire club wants everybody dead so only the mutants will survive by the way) Charles decides to get his shit in order and train the team at his boyhood mansion. What follows is a fancy shmancy training montage intercut with an advancing romance between Beast and Mystique. You see Beast likes Mystique but thinks they&#8217;d both be better off if they tried this experimental serum to change their physical appearances. Beast is all sad because he has big, hairy, monkey feet but is it really that big a deal? The CIA didn&#8217;t even know Beast was a mutant until Charles outed him, it&#8217;s not like his mutation is even that noticeable, but because you knew it was gonna happen he takes the serum. What happens? He turns into a big, blue, furry cat person. Nice job dipshit, I thought you were a genius? Though with so many other plot threads going on this is just kind of brushed aside, he&#8217;s like &#8220;It sucks but I&#8217;ll deal with it.&#8221;</p>
<p>So they all get their shit together and head out to do battle over sea against the Hellfire Club and right between a bunch of Russian and American warships. For the most part, this battle is pretty darn cool. The effects are fantastic and I never get tired of watching Nightcrawler&#8217;s dad teleporting while fighting, maybe his inclusion wasn&#8217;t so bad anyways. Nothing particularly surprising happens until a conflict between Charles and Magneto quickly develops. You see Magneto deflects all the mutants from being hit by like a hundred missiles, but instead of sending them away he tries to shoot them right back at the humans. Charles is most definitely not about this and they start to fight. At this point Magneot has stolen Shaw&#8217;s helmet so Charles cannot read his mind, so Moira MacTaggert then comes up and tries to distract Magneto by shooting him. This ultimately fails when one of the deflected bullets hits Charles in the spine…. Wait a minute, he&#8217;s paralyzed in this movie now? I saw the opening to <i>X-Men: Last Stand</i> and I clearly recall that movie starting with a younger Charles and Magneto and Charles could most definitely walk, plus they were still friends. These movies are now officially impossible to connect with each other, I mean did they even care to watch the others? So the movie ends on a sour note as the mutants have now been split between two factions.</p>
<p>Overall it&#8217;s a strange sensation, as a moviegoer I&#8217;m like &#8220;Yeah that wasn&#8217;t bad, it was entertaining enough.&#8221; but as a comic book fan I&#8221;m like &#8220;What a bunch of fucking bullshit!&#8221; Though seeing that I believe all movies should be viewed subjectively, regardless of whether or not it&#8217;s an adaptation, I&#8217;m giving this a mild pass. If I&#8217;d never heard of the <i>X-Men</i> before going into this movie, I&#8217;d probably have few if any problems with it. It&#8217;s just summer fluff and everyone likes some fluff from time to time, but you don&#8217;t want to eat too much, cause it&#8217;s a good way to get a stomach ache.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=909</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Maid Of Dishonor</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=908</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=908#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 00:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bridesmaids It seems like a female answer to all the bromantic raunchy comedies in recent years is something that&#8217;s been long overdue. &#160;Well the new(ish) comedy Bridesmaids certainly delivers on that notion, and who better to deliver such a film than mega comedy producer Judd Apatow? &#160;Still, most guys don&#8217;t seem willing to go out [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Bridesmaids</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-3HBsHCcDS8k/TewcXUtndhI/AAAAAAAAA_4/yBSTAFYZgNg/s1600/bridesmaids_poster.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-3HBsHCcDS8k/TewcXUtndhI/AAAAAAAAA_4/yBSTAFYZgNg/s320/bridesmaids_poster.jpg" width="215" /></a></div>
<p>It seems like a female answer to all the bromantic raunchy comedies in recent years is something that&#8217;s been long overdue. &nbsp;Well the new(ish) comedy <i>Bridesmaids</i> certainly delivers on that notion, and who better to deliver such a film than mega comedy producer Judd Apatow? &nbsp;Still, most guys don&#8217;t seem willing to go out and see a ladies&#8217; version of The Hangover, but me and Sean nonetheless took it upon ourselves to go out and see it together in a theater mostly packed with women.</p>
<p>In <i>Bridesmaids</i> we follow Annie, (Kristen Wiig) the former owner of a failed bakery who sees her best friend Lillian&nbsp;(Maya Rudolph)&nbsp;getting engaged, and is asked to serve as Lillian&#8217;s maid of honor. &nbsp;Annie&#8217;s life starts to fall even more apart as she takes part in the pre-wedding festivities with a varied group of bridesmaids, which includes Helen (Rose Byrne), whom Annie fears has replaced her as Lillian&#8217;s best friend.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve always liked Kristen Wiig, but I&#8217;ve kind of felt like she usually comes off as just kind of annoying on SNL and hasn&#8217;t yet had any particularly memorable film roles. &nbsp;Well with <i>Bridesmaids</i>, that&#8217;s no longer an issue, because she&#8217;s pretty fantastic throughout the film. &nbsp;She&#8217;s never afraid to go for broke, and for the most part she&#8217;s pretty hilarious from scene to scene. &nbsp;In fact, most of the cast is pretty excellent, with the obvious stand-out being Melissa McCarthy, who basically fills the Zach Galiafanakis role of the bizarre soon-to-be sibling-in-law. </p>
<p>Though Bridesmaids isn&#8217;t quite overflowing with gut-busting sequences, it&#8217;s still filled with a lot of laughs, including an extending puking/defecating sequence that I&#8217;ll admit I found pretty amusing. &nbsp;There&#8217;s definitely a looseness to a lot of the scenes, many of which seem like they had to of been heavily improvised. &nbsp;Sometimes this does tend to make the film&#8217;s pacing lag a little bit, but honestly I didn&#8217;t really mind, considering the film is filled with characters that I simply enjoyed spending time with. &nbsp;And I think that attention to making believable and relatable characters as well as delivering laughs along with some heartfelt moments is always the mark of any successful Apatow production, and <i>Bridesmaids</i> surely has those vital ingredients.</p>
<p>I think every summer I&#8217;m usually looking for that one great comedy, and this summer <i>Bridesmaids</i> might be it, though I think it could be beat. &nbsp;Still, you&#8217;d be hard pressed to find a romantic comedy (or possibly ho-mantic comedy) quite as refreshingly brazen in comparison to all the crappy rom-coms that Hollywood has been unloading on female audiences for years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=908</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Death Cab Decoded</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=907</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=907#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 06:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Death Cab For Cutie &#8211; Codes and Keys I had a handful of posts planned for this week, but with school finals I fell a bit behind. Don&#8217;t worry though, I still plan on doing my weekly installment on the story of The Defenestrators, I&#8217;ll just have to postpone it a little further so be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:x-large;">Death Cab For Cutie &#8211; <i>Codes and Keys</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Th8SNb7Om3s/TevdkvUt-aI/AAAAAAAACB4/dmzgjI1WScU/s1600/Codes_And_Keys_Death_Cab_For_Cutie.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 200px; height: 200px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Th8SNb7Om3s/TevdkvUt-aI/AAAAAAAACB4/dmzgjI1WScU/s200/Codes_And_Keys_Death_Cab_For_Cutie.jpg" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5614824983695849890" /></a>I had a handful of posts planned for this week, but with school finals I fell a bit behind. Don&#8217;t worry though, I still plan on doing my weekly installment on the story of <i>The Defenestrators</i>, I&#8217;ll just have to postpone it a little further so be on the lookout. I also have a few other albums and what not to review, but enough about that let&#8217;s talk about this album.</p>
<p>In the whole grand scheme of <i>Death Cab For Cutie</i> I&#8217;m not really sure where <i>Codes and Keys</i> stands. While <i>Narrow Stairs</i> felt like a significant leap in production and songwriting, <i>Codes and Keys</i> seems to continue the same kind of idea with just a slightly different musical approach. To some that may sound like total bullshit, but it&#8217;s the best I can explain how I feel about it. I&#8217;m not sure that I like it better than <i>Narrow Stairs,</i> but it&#8217;s a damn fine successor with some excellent production and instant <i>Death Cab</i> classics.</p>
<p>The shtick here was to record a less guitar centric album and use a more synth oriented sound. So does this mean it&#8217;s like <i>Postal Service</i>? No, not really, in fact the band has more appropriately likened it to Brian Eno&#8217;s 1975 album <i>Another Green World</i>. I can see this somewhat in the ambient synth textures that support the bulk of <i>Codes and Keys</i> and the use of electronics to create various rhythms, so it&#8217;s definitely reminiscent of that work, there&#8217;s just no English guy singing about St. Elmo&#8217;s Fire.</p>
<p>Despite this more electronic approach the songs on <i>Codes and Keys</i> would probably be interchangeable on almost any <i>Death Can</i> album. What can I say? They have an established sound. &#8220;Home is a Fire&#8221; and &#8220;Unobstructed Views&#8221; and maybe &#8220;Some Boys&#8221; best represent this &#8220;new sound&#8221; but there&#8217;s just as many familiarly arranged <i>Death Cab</i> tracks. &#8220;You Are a Tourist&#8221; is easy to fall in love with in it&#8217;s catchy riff and dissonant chorus hook as is &#8220;Underneath the Sycamore&#8221; which for someone reason really reminds me of something off of <i>Narrow Stairs</i>. The title track &#8220;Codes and Keys&#8221; is without a doubt my favorite track on the album, it&#8217;s just a great song, great melody, and great &#8220;George Martin-esque&#8221; strings.</p>
<p>As much as they might want to claim, I don&#8217;t think the band hasn&#8217;t made any significant leaps in style, but why should they? They seem perfectly comfortable with where they are and I love listening to where they are. I suppose at some point they&#8217;ll need to throw us off with something unexpected to stay fresh, but until then I&#8217;m perfectly content with what they&#8217;ve created here.
<div></div>
<div><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;Codes and Keys&#8221;, &#8220;Doors Unlocked and Open&#8221;, &#8220;You are A Tourist&#8221;</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=907</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Monday Mad Libs</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=906</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=906#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 23:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was going to write about the DaMorgue crew trip to Bend, Oregon last weekend to see Death Cab For Cutie and Bright Eyes but I just fell too far behind/lost interest. All I&#8217;ll say is that it was a beautiful experience, almost as beautiful as the last half hour of Arnold Schwarzenegger&#8217;s Junior (Check [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going to write about the DaMorgue crew trip to Bend, Oregon last weekend to see <i>Death Cab For Cutie</i> and <i>Bright Eyes</i> but I just fell too far behind/lost interest. All I&#8217;ll say is that it was a beautiful experience, almost as beautiful as the last half hour of Arnold Schwarzenegger&#8217;s <i>Junior </i>(Check it out, you won&#8217;t regret it.) So instead I decided to go with this experimental post that I hope you will at least find mildly amusing.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve all done Mad Libs, big whoop whatever. I&#8217;m sure we all have found memories of highly inappropriate libs about trips to the fair and the first day of school, but so often I&#8217;ve regretted throwing out my old Mad Libs. So instead of just throwing them out I decided to &#8220;recycle&#8221; them on the blog. Now why should anyone care about our Mad Libs? I&#8217;m not even sure if the rest of the DaMorgue crew cares, but I find them very amusing. Just think of them as terrible short stories and maybe you can enjoy the subtle retardation of our bored musings. If anyone likes them at all I&#8217;ll post more, but I understand if you&#8217;re like &#8220;Fuck this shit!&#8221; Halfway through I almost gave up on this post but I can&#8217;t give up on two consecutive posts, that&#8217;s un-American.</p>
<p>
<div style="text-align: center;">(Bold denotes what we filled in, if it&#8217;s not already obvious)</div>
<p><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-xNr5D28Kywo/TeXTo35wZiI/AAAAAAAACBk/qW7tY6NKWRs/s1600/420166761_0cfac981d6.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 240px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-xNr5D28Kywo/TeXTo35wZiI/AAAAAAAACBk/qW7tY6NKWRs/s320/420166761_0cfac981d6.jpg" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5613125209741616674" /></a>
<div style="text-align: center;"><b>Our Town</b> </div>
<p><b>The Wiggles</b> came to do a concert in <b>Paulville</b> once, and the band liked it so much they never left. Now every <b>humpday</b> night, all the people who live in<b> Paulville</b> put on their <b>feelings</b>, <b>kilts</b> and walk their <b>sugar monkeys</b> to the town square. Then they sit on the grass, listen to <b>The Wiggles</b> play <b>propaganda</b> music, and eat <b>fruit by the foot.</b></p>
<p>No one has to go to school in <b>Paulville</b> unless they want to. Of course, everybody wants to because <b>Clint Eastwood</b> and <b>Damon Wayans</b> are two of the teachers. <b>Clint Eastwood</b> teaches <b>Fun with Computers</b> and <b>Damon Wayans</b> teaches <b>Magnets.</b></p>
<p>One day <b>Clint Eastwood</b> said to <b>Damon Wayans</b>, “Maybe we should take the students on a field trip.”</p>
<p>“That&#8217;s a <b>bold</b> idea, <b>Clint Eastwood</b>,” said Damon Wayans. “Let&#8217;s take them to the most fun place we can think of.”</p>
<p>“But that would be <b>Paulville</b>,” said <b>Clint Eastwood.</b></p>
<div>“You&#8217;re right!” <b>Damon Wayans</b> exclaimed. “Call off the field trip! We&#8217;re already here!”</p>
<p><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-R2-7UHRObzs/TeXUccuvEAI/AAAAAAAACBs/er1aZ5Dc7PA/s1600/autumn_road2.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 240px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-R2-7UHRObzs/TeXUccuvEAI/AAAAAAAACBs/er1aZ5Dc7PA/s320/autumn_road2.jpg" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5613126095800832002" /></a></div>
<div>
<div style="text-align: center;"><b>Autumn </b></div>
<p>Yesterday <b>Rod Blagojevich</b> and I went for an <b>insestua</b>l fall walk. It was getting colder, so we had to put on our woolly <b>underpants</b> and sweaters.</div>
<div>Halfway down the block, we saw the <b>Phillips</b> family out in their yard. The <b>Phillips</b> children were raking big piles of <b>multiple murders</b> and leaping into them. Mrs. <b>Phillips</b> was planting <b>cowboy hat</b> bulbs so she would have beautiful <b>cowboy hat</b> flowers in the spring.</div>
<div>“Fall is in the air,” <b>Rod Blagojevich</b> said. “Soon the days will be getting more <b>suspicious</b> .”</div>
<div>We walked down <b>Taggart</b> Street admiring the <b>aquamarine</b> and<b> burnt sienna</b> leaves. Overhead, <b>Aqua Men </b>were flying south for the winter. Two <b>badgers</b> scampered by, hiding acorns in a tree for the winter.</div>
<div>“That makes me hungry,” said <b>Rod Blagojevich</b>. “Maybe we should go pick some nice round red <b>scapegoats</b> and bake them in a pie.”</div>
<div>“I&#8217;m <b>going off the grid</b>!” I said. “That sounds <b>ill tempered</b>.”</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=906</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>C.A.T.: Head Hunters</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=905</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=905#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 03:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Herbie Hancock &#8211; Head Hunters (1973) It&#8217;s weird how whenever an album leaves your iTunes, it almost ceases to exist. &#160;Or at least that&#8217;s what seemed to be the case with Herbie Hancock&#8217;s Head Hunters, an album that I lost years ago (can&#8217;t recall why), but I downloaded it about a month ago and have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Herbie Hancock &#8211; <i>Head Hunters </i>(1973)</span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-UmoA_B-vyns/Tdx435rI1rI/AAAAAAAAA_0/CfA36Ab7FCg/s1600/Head_Hunters_Album.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-UmoA_B-vyns/Tdx435rI1rI/AAAAAAAAA_0/CfA36Ab7FCg/s200/Head_Hunters_Album.jpg" width="199" /></a>It&#8217;s weird how whenever an album leaves your iTunes, it almost ceases to exist. &nbsp;Or at least that&#8217;s what seemed to be the case with Herbie Hancock&#8217;s <i>Head Hunters</i>, an album that I lost years ago (can&#8217;t recall why), but I downloaded it about a month ago and have become reaquainted with its funky greatness ever since. &nbsp;I can&#8217;t say I&#8217;m huge jazz-fusion fan, but this is one of those albums that pretty much transcends its genre in creating something truly essential.</p>
<p>By the time of Head Hunters&#8217; release, the fusion movement had fully taken hold of the jazz world, while Herbie Hancock&#8217;s sextet had established themselves as one of the more prominent artists in this ever blossoming genre. &nbsp;However, the sextet&#8217;s first few albums that dabbled in fusion where largely experimental, and <i>Head Hunters</i> saw Hancock exploring exploring a more groove-based sound that allowed the album to become one of the most successful jazz-fusion albums ever released. &nbsp;Throughout the album, the grooves are always super tight while the playing seems effortless, while often bordering on straight-up funk more than jazz.</p>
<p>Of course the stand-out track would have to be the 15-minute jazz-funk staple &#8220;Chameleon&#8221;, a song that&#8217;s filled with a seemingly endless plethora of tasty synth lines, all while bolstered by some tight percussion and that unmistakeable bassline. &nbsp;The rest of the album has that same deliciously funky sound, while Herbie tries his hand at a number of different synthesizers, as they mesh wonderfully with his always brilliant electric piano work. &nbsp;Maybe it&#8217;s about time I check some more of Herbie Hancock&#8217;s work, since this is the only album of his I&#8217;ve heard and it&#8217;s got to be one of the most badass albums I&#8217;ve ever come across.</p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;Chameleon&#8221;, &#8220;Watermelon Man&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=905</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sending Out an S.O.S.</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=904</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=904#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2011 06:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides I had no intentions of seeing yet another cash in Pirates movie, but when I got the call from Ben last Friday I came to the conclusion that &#8220;Someday and in some form I will eventually see this movie, maybe not today, maybe not tomorrow but someday.&#8221; So [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"> <i>Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/2.5.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-gS3SeBzJgzs/Tdg1ZnEiNqI/AAAAAAAACBc/nsfIV_4XbjA/s1600/On_Stranger_Tides_Poster.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 216px; height: 320px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-gS3SeBzJgzs/Tdg1ZnEiNqI/AAAAAAAACBc/nsfIV_4XbjA/s320/On_Stranger_Tides_Poster.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5609292049990956706" /></a>I had no intentions of seeing yet another cash in <i>Pirates</i> movie, but when I got the call from Ben last Friday I came to the conclusion that &#8220;Someday and in some form I will eventually see this movie, maybe not today, maybe not tomorrow but someday.&#8221; So later that day we arrived at the theater with the regular summer blockbuster crowd and strapped in for yet another Caribbean carousal of overblown effects and lengthy plot exposition. </p>
<p>By all logic the <i>Pirates</i> franchise should of been able to make a full rebound here. It had become free of it&#8217;s trilogy confines and with the jettison of Orlando Bloom and Keira Knightley had the rare opportunity for a fresh start. There&#8217;s no reason why this shouldn&#8217;t have been just as good as the first one and yet it suffers many of the same pitfalls as the last two, regulating it&#8217;s position to the second worst of the franchise. It is by no means a complete misfire but far too often takes to the plank, only to eventually drown in a sea of inadequacy.  </p>
<p><i>On Stranger Tides</i> is loosely based on the 1987 novel of the same name by Tim Powers. So apparently this novel was so great that it was better than any original idea the writers could have conceived, despite the fact that it has nothing to do with the franchise. &#8220;If it&#8217;s so great why don&#8217;t they just make a movie faithful to that book?&#8221; I ponder, but then remind myself that the <i>Pirates</i> franchise is a juggernaut at the box office. So right there you can see this was a movie where financial gain took precedent over telling a story, seeing as they just ripped it from some fantasy novel. Anyways, <i>On Stranger Tides</i> regals us once again with the swashbuckling misadventures of Captain Jack Sparrow, this time in pursuit of the Fountain of Youth. Recruited against his will by his old flame Angelica (Penelope Cruz) and her ruthless father Blackbeard (Ian McShane), Jack is forced to use his knowledge of the area so that he can lead Blackbeard to eternal youth. Meanwhile Captain Barbosa (Geoffrey Rush) returns now as a privateer for King George (Richard Griffiths) who is ordered to get to the fountain before the Spanish because those guys suck. </p>
<p>Let me proceed next with a handful of unrelated yet bothersome queries. First off, why does Blackbeard&#8217;s daughter have a Spanish accent? Blackbeard I remind you was a real English Pirate who never reportedly harmed anyone he robbed and was killed by the Royal Navy by the time he was 38.  Now he&#8217;s a murderous pirate played by a 68 year old with a latin daughter. I know it&#8217;s all just fun and fantasy, but it really seems more like laziness and a big excuse to hire Penelope Cruz. I think Blackbeard delivers a line like &#8220;It&#8217;s your mother&#8217;s latin blood in you&#8221; to explain, but didn&#8217;t he raise her? I just plain don&#8217;t get it. Moving on to a more substantial issue, why must there be so much plot exposition? It&#8217;s a movie about pirates, they should be pillaging and going on adventures and getting drunk, why do they have to talk so much about the plot of the movie? </p>
<p>It&#8217;s as if overcomplicating every aspect of the story has become a staple of this series. Take the opening; Jack is put on trial but woops, they have the wrong guy then Jack appears as the Judge and he escapes. Uh oh, then Jack is captured by King George&#8217;s men and forced to help them find the fountain, so Jack escapes AGAIN. Now tell me why they couldn&#8217;t of started the film with that second scene? Both establish that he&#8217;s an infamous pirate and both end the same way. For whatever reason the <i>Pirates</i> films feel the need to stretch out every sequence for as long as possible, why? Is it because the other films did that? Don&#8217;t they remember they just kept getting worse? And I almost forgot, there&#8217;s another insipid sequence before those two regarding the Spanish discovering the existence of a fountain, though it hardly matters, they only pop up every now and then when a scene needs more bad guys for Jack to fight. </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s move on to something good about this movie alright? Johnny Depp is amusing as usual and shows that he can hold down being the primary protagonist without any overly serious leads. Some of the action sequences are carefree summer fun as well. I don&#8217;t think I can ever tell what&#8217;s going in a sword fight scene but there&#8217;s a really entertaining mermaid attack scene. You see they need to have like… A mermaid&#8217;s tear in one of the chalices they drink the fountain water out of so uh like, one person drinks fountain water with a tear and the other without so they can um, switch life-forces? Ya know, like one gets eternal life while the other person dies? So… The mermaid sequence is surprisingly exciting and it makes me wish there were more monsters in this series. Actually the last half hour or maybe forty-five minutes, (I don&#8217;t know I have no sense of time when I go to these movies.) had some highly entertaining set pieces and effects, which almost evened out all the boring shit. Unfortunately there was a lot of boring shit, a lot. So in that case a pirate&#8217;s life is certainly not for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=904</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>T3: The Sounds Of Summer</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=903</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=903#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 21:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Ten]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well I&#8217;m sitting here waiting for my final class of the semester as one final summer vacation hangs in the balance, all while Sean and Nancy prepare for real fucking life. &#160;So just for the hell of it, I figured I&#8217;d take a look at my all-time favorite &#8220;summer songs&#8221;. &#160;Now I&#8217;m not saying this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I&#8217;m sitting here waiting for my final class of the semester as one final summer vacation hangs in the balance, all while Sean and Nancy prepare for real fucking life. &nbsp;So just for the hell of it, I figured I&#8217;d take a look at my all-time favorite &#8220;summer songs&#8221;. &nbsp;Now I&#8217;m not saying this is any kind of &#8220;definitive&#8221; list of the songs that epitomize summer the best, these are just the ones that I&#8217;m fondest of. &nbsp;So if anyone feels like posting a similar list of their own, feel free.
<div>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">10. Pavement -<i>&nbsp;</i>&#8220;Summer Babe&#8221;</span>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><object class="BLOGGER-youtube-video" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" data-thumbnail-src="http://1.gvt0.com/vi/tU_68xRikG0/0.jpg" height="266" width="320"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/tU_68xRikG0&#038;fs=1&#038;source=uds" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF" /><embed width="440" height="266" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/tU_68xRikG0&#038;fs=1&#038;source=uds" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"></embed></object></div>
<p>It&#8217;s always kind of hard to tell what the hell Stephen Malkmus is talking about, even on one of Pavement&#8217;s more heartfelt songs like &#8220;Summer Babe&#8221;. &nbsp;But beneath all that guitar fuzz and surreal imagery, you&#8217;ve got a nice little ode to youthful summer love, &#8217;90s slacker style.</td>
<td width="150"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"><br /></span></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">9. The Ramones -<i>&nbsp;</i>&#8220;Rockaway Beach&#8221;</span></div>
</td>
<td width="150">
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"></div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><object class="BLOGGER-youtube-video" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" data-thumbnail-src="http://1.gvt0.com/vi/79S5k1pgWZU/0.jpg" height="266" width="320"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/79S5k1pgWZU&#038;fs=1&#038;source=uds" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF" /><embed width="440" height="266" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/79S5k1pgWZU&#038;fs=1&#038;source=uds" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"></embed></object></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">The Ramones always we&#8217;re a bubble gum pop group at their heart, and &#8220;Rockaway Beach&#8221; is definitely one of the better examples of that cheery optimism that was just bubbling beneath their aggressive exterior. &nbsp;When you think of summer songs, you tend to think of Southern California sunshine, but The Ramones vie instead for the &#8220;hot concrete&#8221; and &#8220;disco on the radio&#8221; of 70&#8242;s New York.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"></div>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">8. The Hold Steady -<i>&nbsp;</i>&#8220;Constructive Summer&#8221;</span></div>
</td>
<td width="150">
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"></div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><object class="BLOGGER-youtube-video" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" data-thumbnail-src="http://2.gvt0.com/vi/mbEtMHkgPg4/0.jpg" height="266" width="320"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/mbEtMHkgPg4&#038;fs=1&#038;source=uds" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF" /><embed width="440" height="266" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/mbEtMHkgPg4&#038;fs=1&#038;source=uds" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"></embed></object></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">Considering how much of The Hold Steady&#8217;s music seem to encapsulate those joyous booze-fueled summer nights, there are a lot of Hold Steady songs I could of put on this list, but I opted just to go with their most obvious &#8220;summer song&#8221;. &nbsp;Plus it&#8217;s not hard to relate with the idea of a constructive summer. &nbsp;We all have those certain things we&#8217;d like to accomplish before the summer months are through, but alas we usually just end up hanging out in Sean&#8217;s basement. &nbsp;Oh well.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"></div>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">7. Wilco -<i>&nbsp;</i>&#8220;Heavy Metal Drummer&#8221;</span></div>
</td>
<td width="150">
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"></div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><object class="BLOGGER-youtube-video" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" data-thumbnail-src="http://3.gvt0.com/vi/0f4s427bx7c/0.jpg" height="266" width="320"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/0f4s427bx7c&#038;fs=1&#038;source=uds" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF" /><embed width="440" height="266" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/0f4s427bx7c&#038;fs=1&#038;source=uds" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"></embed></object></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">I&#8217;m guessing as you get older, summer comes to represent a kind of nostalgia for summer&#8217;s past rather another few months of freedom, and that&#8217;s what Jeff Tweedy and co. seem to be tapping in to on &#8220;Heavy Metal Drummer&#8221;. &nbsp;It&#8217;s just got that great whistful quality that somehow leaves you yearning for the days of &#8220;playing Kiss covers, beautiful and stoned&#8221;.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"></div>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">6. The Beach Boys &#8211; &#8220;All Summer Long&#8221;</span></div>
</td>
<td width="150">
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"></div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><object class="BLOGGER-youtube-video" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" data-thumbnail-src="http://0.gvt0.com/vi/V6Hryc5t2wQ/0.jpg" height="266" width="320"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/V6Hryc5t2wQ&#038;fs=1&#038;source=uds" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF" /><embed width="440" height="266" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/V6Hryc5t2wQ&#038;fs=1&#038;source=uds" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"></embed></object></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">Of course this list wouldn&#8217;t be complete without a showing from The Beach Boys, though I&#8217;d say a lot of their songs aren&#8217;t so much about summer as they are just about living in Southern California. &nbsp;Still, when you think of Summer, you think of The Beach Boys, and this is one of those songs that simply encapsulates the timeless teenage ritual of hanging out in the sun and havin&#8217; fun. &nbsp;Plus it&#8217;s association with <i>American Graffiti</i> doesn&#8217;t hurt either.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"></div>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">5. Sly &amp; The Family Stone &#8211; &#8220;Hot Fun In The Summertime&#8221;</span></div>
</td>
<td width="150">
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"></div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><object class="BLOGGER-youtube-video" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" data-thumbnail-src="http://2.gvt0.com/vi/tWdVClbOYwI/0.jpg" height="266" width="320"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/tWdVClbOYwI&#038;fs=1&#038;source=uds" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF" /><embed width="440" height="266" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/tWdVClbOYwI&#038;fs=1&#038;source=uds" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"></embed></object></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">Certainly one of the more obligotory summer songs, but come on, how can you resist a song like this? &nbsp;It&#8217;s got that easygoing laid back feel that just seems about perfect for representing those summer days, all delivered with Sly&#8217;s signature sound that seems to pull all sorts of bits and pieces from every corner of the pop world. &nbsp;However, &#8220;Don&#8217;t Call Me Nigger, Whitey&#8221; is not the first song I&#8217;d think of as a good medley candidate for it, but I guess that&#8217;s just the diverse nature of Sly and The Family Stone for you.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"></div>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">4. Bruce Springsteen -<i>&nbsp;</i>&#8220;Thunder Road&#8221;</span></div>
</td>
<td width="150">
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"></div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><object class="BLOGGER-youtube-video" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" data-thumbnail-src="http://2.gvt0.com/vi/FocIlccCBsY/0.jpg" height="266" width="320"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/FocIlccCBsY&#038;fs=1&#038;source=uds" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF" /><embed width="440" height="266" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/FocIlccCBsY&#038;fs=1&#038;source=uds" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"></embed></object></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">The Boss is another one of those artists where it seems like half his discography is well suited for the summer months, but I don&#8217;t think any other of his songs quite encompass a hot summer night like &#8220;Thunder Road&#8221;, as well as most of the <i>Born To Run</i> album for that matter. &nbsp;And Springsteen&#8217;s vision of summer isn&#8217;t just about laid-back fun in the sun, it&#8217;s an epic journey in which the possibilities of youth seem endless as long as you&#8217;ve got a full tank of gas and plenty of blind ambition.</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"></div>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">3. Frank Sinatra -<i>&nbsp;</i>&#8220;Summer Wind&#8221;</span></div>
</td>
<td width="150">
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"></div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><object class="BLOGGER-youtube-video" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" data-thumbnail-src="http://0.gvt0.com/vi/Z9wNfAheqnA/0.jpg" height="266" width="440"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Z9wNfAheqnA&#038;fs=1&#038;source=uds" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF" /><embed width="440" height="266" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Z9wNfAheqnA&#038;fs=1&#038;source=uds" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"></embed></object></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">Quite possibly my favorite song from Old Blue Eyes, and for me the ultimate laid back summer jam. &nbsp;And Sinatra being the old battered soul that was, gives you the impression that he&#8217;s had his share of summer flings, but nonetheless life goes on just like the seasons, even if you can&#8217;t escape that god damn summer wind.&nbsp;</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"></div>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">2. Husker Du -<i>&nbsp;</i>&#8220;Celebrated Summer&#8221;</span></div>
</td>
<td width="150">
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"></div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><object class="BLOGGER-youtube-video" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" data-thumbnail-src="http://1.gvt0.com/vi/GtCL1xq6hNU/0.jpg" height="266" width="320"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/GtCL1xq6hNU&#038;fs=1&#038;source=uds" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF" /><embed width="440" height="266" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GtCL1xq6hNU&#038;fs=1&#038;source=uds" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"></embed></object></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">Beneath all that guitar fuzz, you&#8217;ve got a song about summer that&#8217;s just about as universal anything in any of the songs on this lists, as Bob Mould rabbles about &#8220;hanging out on the beach or playing in a band&#8221;. &nbsp;However, there&#8217;s still a bittersweet quality to the song, as Mould eventually asks &#8220;do you remember when the first snowfall fell?&#8221;, inferring the impending reality that for midwesterners, the line between summer and winter is quite thin.</div>
<p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">1. R.E.M. -&nbsp;&#8221;Nightswimming&#8221;</span></div>
</div>
</td>
<td width="150">
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"></div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><object class="BLOGGER-youtube-video" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" data-thumbnail-src="http://2.gvt0.com/vi/Qx9br5ISRpo/0.jpg" height="266" width="320"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Qx9br5ISRpo&#038;fs=1&#038;source=uds" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF" /><embed width="440" height="266" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Qx9br5ISRpo&#038;fs=1&#038;source=uds" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"></embed></object></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">For me, R.E.M. have always been a band that&#8217;s easy to like, but hard to love. &nbsp;So inherently they&#8217;ve always been relegated on my top tens to either honorable mentions or barely sneaking in to the ten spot. &nbsp;But when it comes to evoking Summer&#8217;s youthful nostalgia, R.E.M.&#8217;s number 1 in my book. &nbsp;This is just an undeniably beautiful song, and it&#8217;s really about as simple as it gets. &nbsp;Mike Mills&#8217; circling piano chords are complemented perfectly by Michael Stipe&#8217;s lyrics that evoke R.E.M.&#8217;s teenage nights in Athens, GA, while John Paul Jones (yeah, that John Paul Jones), provides some stirring string arrangements. &nbsp;It&#8217;s a song that&#8217;s easy to get lost in, for sure.</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=903</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>C.A.T: Pink Moon</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=902</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=902#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 06:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=902</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nick Drake &#8211; Pink Moon (1972) This week honors what in the past few years has become one of my favorite and most listened to albums. It&#8217;s the intimate swan song from English singer-songwriter Nick Drake before his quiet descent into obscurity and then untimely passing two years later from a drug overdose at the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Nick Drake &#8211; <i>Pink Moon (1972)</i></span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-RRxjZJY3O0A/TdMGhXENwoI/AAAAAAAACBU/Ofis3GVbWAo/s1600/pink-moon1.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 200px; height: 200px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-RRxjZJY3O0A/TdMGhXENwoI/AAAAAAAACBU/Ofis3GVbWAo/s200/pink-moon1.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5607833131203543682" /></a>This week honors what in the past few years has become one of my favorite and most listened to albums. It&#8217;s the intimate swan song from English singer-songwriter Nick Drake before his quiet descent into obscurity and then untimely passing two years later from a drug overdose at the age of 26. Though he is still primarily unknown to the masses, his music still perseveres and continues to inspire listeners just lucky enough to stumble across his bittersweet sound. </p>
<p><i>Pink Moon</i>, Drake&#8217;s third and final release is an intimate 28 minutes displaying nothing more than Drake and his acoustic guitar (with some piano on the title track) and yet it&#8217;s perfect. Anything more would only ruin the serene simplicity of it, but there&#8217;s nothing simple about Drake&#8217;s musicianship. <i>Pink Moon</i> may exude a kind of laid back swagger but listen closely and you&#8217;ll hear the meticulous arrangements of Drake&#8217;s guitar parts. Drake practiced obsessively on arrangements, patterns, and various experimental tunings. I can&#8217;t tell you how many times I&#8217;ve tried to learn a Nick Drake guitar tab and given up halfway through. DADGAF#? BF#BEBD# with a  capo? And he rarely used the same tuning twice.</p>
<p>Some critics have called <i>Pink Moon</i> the least accessible of Drake&#8217;s albums, but I strongly disagree. I like to think that the song &#8220;Pink Moon&#8221; with it&#8217;s catchy melody and Drake&#8217;s soft baritone makes it the gateway song to the rest of Drake&#8217;s music, it&#8217;s how I first heard him. The record may not have a backing band or lavish production to fall on, but I&#8217;ve always felt that these were Drake&#8217;s best songs and best represented what he stood for. He was a shy and quiet songsmith who rarely performed in front of people and had little desire for fame. All he wanted to do was craft beautiful music and I think these compositions stand for themselves.</p>
<p>I prefer to listen to <i>Pink Moon</i> in the late hours of the night as to avoid all distractions. I also don&#8217;t believe I&#8217;ve ever sat down and listened to it with out finishing it either. It all flows together in such a natural way and even though it&#8217;s brief, chances are good it will still be drifting around in your head as you go to sleep. </p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;From the Morning&#8221;, &#8220;Pink Moon&#8221;, &#8220;Road&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=902</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Summertime Blues</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=901</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=901#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 04:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fleet Foxes &#8211; Helplessness Blues With their refreshingly straightforward brand of folk-pop, Fleet Foxes created one of the most beloved debut albums in recent memory. &#160;Their latest album Helplessness Blues, is one of those great sophomore releases that sees the band expanding just enough on their sound to feel like an impressive step forward while [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Fleet Foxes &#8211; <i>Helplessness Blues</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-9v0glcbUFX4/TdH0rUDWEEI/AAAAAAAAA_w/sRTAtqi9a_A/s1600/helplessnessblues.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-9v0glcbUFX4/TdH0rUDWEEI/AAAAAAAAA_w/sRTAtqi9a_A/s200/helplessnessblues.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<p>With their refreshingly straightforward brand of folk-pop, Fleet Foxes created one of the most beloved debut albums in recent memory. &nbsp;Their latest album <i>Helplessness Blues</i>, is one of those great sophomore releases that sees the band expanding just enough on their sound to feel like an impressive step forward while still offering the same lush harmonies and excellent songwriting you&#8217;d expect from these Seattle folkies.</p>
<p>What really stood out for me about Fleet Foxes&#8217; debut among other things was their masterful use of four-part harmonies, and there&#8217;s certainly no shortage of breathtaking vocal arrangements on <i>Helplessness Blues</i>. &nbsp;However, you&#8217;ve got lead singer/songwriter (and Lake Washington High School alum) Robin Pecknold stepping even more to the forefront, which gives the album a more intimate feeling on a lot of the songs. &nbsp;However, you&#8217;ve still got songs like &#8220;Lorelei&#8221; and &#8220;Grown Ocean&#8221; that have that gorgeous all-encompassing sound that these guys do quite well. &nbsp;And you&#8217;ve even got traces of psychedelic sounds that fit quite nicely with Fleet Foxes &#8217;60s inspired aesthetic.</p>
<p>In addition, <i>Helplessness Blues</i> also has it&#8217;s darker moments in addition to the more whimsical tracks, while the songs frequently have a somewhat looser quality, often taking on different shapes and tempos in midstream. &nbsp;The lyrics are a bit more insular, with Pecknold approaching more personal themes and motifs, and it&#8217;s all done with the utmost care and precision.</p>
<p>Honestly, I&#8217;m a little surprised how deeply I&#8217;ve gotten into this album since as much as I liked Fleet Foxes&#8217; debut, I never quite fell in love with it the way a lot of people did. &nbsp;Maybe it&#8217;s just because I&#8217;ve had so few albums that I&#8217;ve really responded to this year, but either way it&#8217;s filled with lots of truly breathtaking material and it&#8217;s a fine album to start off the summer with. </p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;Battery Kinzie&#8221;, &#8220;Helplessness Blues&#8221;, &#8220;Grown Ocean&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=901</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hanna Get Your Gun</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=900</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=900#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 02:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hanna I&#8217;ve never been the biggest fan of director Joe Wright. I never saw Pride &#38; Prejudice. I thought Atonement was not nearly as great as everyone told me it was supposed to be and I wrote The Soloist off as pathetic Oscar-bait. But that doesn&#8217;t mean I didn&#8217;t want to give the guy a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><i>Hanna</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-mSJm50PH0kA/Tc4mbNwZgiI/AAAAAAAABBw/0rDxJl3RJH0/s1600/Hanna_poster.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-mSJm50PH0kA/Tc4mbNwZgiI/AAAAAAAABBw/0rDxJl3RJH0/s320/Hanna_poster.jpg" width="214" /></a></div>
<p>I&#8217;ve never been the biggest fan of director Joe Wright. I never saw <i>Pride &amp; Prejudice</i>. I thought <i>Atonement </i>was not nearly as great as everyone told me it was supposed to be and I wrote <i>The Soloist </i>off as pathetic Oscar-bait. But that doesn&#8217;t mean I didn&#8217;t want to give the guy a chance. There certainly were parts of <i>Atonement </i>that were interesting, especially the infamous tracking shot on the beaches of Dunkirk. My roommates and I recently had a chance to take on Wright&#8217;s latest, <i>Hanna</i>, in an empty theater. Did his new action picture have what it takes to finally win me over? I think the answer is obvious, since you&#8217;ve already seen my star rating, but humor me anyway.</p>
<p>Hanna (Saoirse Ronan) is a little girl who has spent her whole life living in the icy wilderness with her father (Eric Bana), the only other person she has ever known. All she knows about the real world is what she has heard from an encyclopedia. She has been trained in a variety of martial arts, foreign languages and survival strategies. When the time comes, she will enter society for the first time. Her mission: kill corrupt CIA agent Marissa Wiegler (Cate Blanchett).</p>
<p>Saoirse Ronan continues to prove herself a talent young actress, nailing this complex role. Hanna speaks in numerous languages and accents, has to be extremely tough sometimes, extremely vulnerable other times and always thinking a lot more than she says. Blanchett speaks with a hilarious, villainous American accent that maybe someday, after decades of research, science will be able to explain. Bana is basically just playing the same part he&#8217;s played his whole career, which I can&#8217;t fault him for doing. The whole supporting cast is great, I found myself really not liking the other villains and being thoroughly amused by the innocent bystanders Hanna runs into.</p>
<p>But <i>Hanna </i>is a great film because of its style. Part of the credit has to go to the Chemical Brothers&#8217; pulsating score. We were all whistling the theme when we left the theater. Wright&#8217;s camera does a lot of interesting things &#8211; there is another long tracking shot that&#8217;s pretty cool &#8211; and the film&#8217;s kinetic editing style actually works, unlike other shaky action pictures of late, like <i>Quantum of Solace</i>. The movie just seems really cool most of the time, shifting to more intimate and dreamlike moods when necessary. <i>Hanna</i>&#8216;s a really effectively made picture.</p>
<p>So you win, Joe Wright. I like one of your movies. In fact, I really liked it. Now just don&#8217;t let me down with your next project. What&#8217;s that? Your next project is a live action adaptation of <i>The Little Mermaid</i>. That&#8217;s&#8230; um&#8230; wow. OK then. Well, at least <i>Hanna</i> was good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=900</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s a Post About Nothing.</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=899</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=899#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 17:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am only writing this post to avoid the risk that this could be a one post week. I like to think that I personally should be able to write at least one post a week, even if I have nothing to say. With that said I suppose I could use this time to mention [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am only writing this post to avoid the risk that this could be a one post week. I like to think that I personally should be able to write at least one post a week, even if I have nothing to say. With that said I suppose I could use this time to mention possible upcoming topics and subjects that will generate future posts for future generations. To start it&#8217;s only a few weeks &#8217;till the DaMorgue crew is taking our voyage to Bend, Oregon to see <i>Death Cab for Cutie</i> and <i>Bright Eyes</i>, that sounds like a rip-roaring adventure waiting to happen. Sean will also be graduating around the same time so I can only assume the blog will now be his career, cheers! </p>
<p>I feel like there&#8217;s some albums coming up&#8230; Definitely a new <i>Death Cab</i> and <i>My Morning Jacket</i> record. Last time I checked they were both coming out on the same day. There&#8217;s probably all sorts of indie releases that Sean and Colin know about but I don&#8217;t, everyone loves surprises, I know I do!</p>
<p>Usually this is where I&#8217;d talk about movies but I wont. There&#8217;s a bunch coming out and we&#8217;ll be seeing and reviewing a handful of them, nuff said. In more dramatic blog news you can look forward to a weekly post retelling the amazing musical journey of <i>The Defenestrators</i> starting the first week of June. For those who don&#8217;t know <i>The D</i> was and still is the band that myself, Colin, and Nancy Tin Tin all formed in Junior High. So you can look forward to an in-depth retelling of our ultimate story of; sex, drugs, and something something coming this summer. </p>
<p>I still plan on filming something small this summer as well as to further hone our craft and amuse, there will be more news on that as it develops. Hmm, seems that&#8217;s all I can think of right now, but keep checking in for further updates and tom foolery, Otteni out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=899</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>97</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>C.A.T.: Who&#8217;s Next</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=898</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=898#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 04:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=898</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Who &#8211; Who&#8217;s Next (1971) I&#8217;m not quite sure how it happened, but somehow we&#8217;ve done 100+ CAT&#8217;s and yet we&#8217;ve never done one from a band that all of Da Morgue writers have been fans of for a long time, The Who. &#160;I pretty much love every one of The Who&#8217;s albums from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">The Who &#8211; <i>Who&#8217;s Next </i>(1971)</span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-3-kXO3nhjto/TcoO3WYGQBI/AAAAAAAAA_s/Fl1KpXKIqOQ/s1600/who%2527snext.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-3-kXO3nhjto/TcoO3WYGQBI/AAAAAAAAA_s/Fl1KpXKIqOQ/s200/who%2527snext.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<p>I&#8217;m not quite sure how it happened, but somehow we&#8217;ve done 100+ CAT&#8217;s and yet we&#8217;ve never done one from a band that all of Da Morgue writers have been fans of for a long time, The Who. &nbsp;I pretty much love every one of The Who&#8217;s albums from their debut up until <i>Quadrophenia, </i>but<i> Who&#8217;s Next&nbsp;</i>has always been in my opinion their greatest work. &nbsp;Also, <i>Who&#8217;s Next</i> has always been an album that I&#8217;ve had a pretty deep personal fondness for, so forgive me if I get ridiculously nostalgic about an album that came out nearly two decades before I was born.</p>
<p>I can distinctly remember having just turned 14 years old and going to Fred Meyer to buy a copy of <i>Who&#8217;s Next.</i>&nbsp;&nbsp;I don&#8217;t know what compelled me to buy the album, as I knew very little about The Who apart from a couple songs and their appearance on The Simpsons. &nbsp;Anyways, I got home, popped in the CD, and effectively had my mind blown. &nbsp;I hadn&#8217;t really ever heard anything like it. &nbsp;It just seemed so powerful and bursting with energy, but also so introspective and confessional at the same time. &nbsp;And even when I listen to it now, I still get an inkling of that kick out of it since the songs and the execution are just that good.</p>
<p>Some of the songs on <i>Who&#8217;s Next</i> came out of a bigger project that Pete Townshend had been planning called Lifehouse as an even grander follow-up to the 1969 rock opera <i>Tommy</i>. &nbsp;Of course, the Lifehouse project was eventually abandoned and Pete Townshend came up with an album that was not a rock opera, but just a bunch of really good songs. &nbsp;Even if <i>Who&#8217;s Next</i> didn&#8217;t top <i>Tommy</i> in ambitious scope, it&#8217;s still an amazing achievement just in that it really catches The Who at the top of their game collectively. &nbsp;Townshend&#8217;s songs are as good as ever, and the fact that he introduces synthesizers to The Who&#8217;s raunchy sound makes the album somewhat of a groundbreaker considering basically no rock bands were using synths yet. &nbsp;And on top of that you&#8217;ve got some of Entwistle&#8217;s most masterful basslines, Moon&#8217;s most brilliantly manic drumming, and Roger Daltrey reaching the full depth of his powerful range.</p>
<p>I guess it also speaks volumes to The Who&#8217;s brilliance that I still love this album even though there isn&#8217;t a whole lot of arena-bound classic rock music that I still like, even though it was what I spent a lot of my youth listening to. &nbsp;But I think Pete Townshend&#8217;s songs lend themselves to a kind of resonance that transcends the classic rock genre, even if each new CSI show threatens to destroy that resonance. &nbsp;It&#8217;s got to be in my top five albums of all time, easily.</p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;Baba O&#8217;Riley&#8221;, &#8220;The Song Is Over&#8221;, &#8220;Won&#8217;t Get Fooled Again&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=898</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Retrospecticus: Marvel Movies</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=896</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=896#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 08:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Retrospecticus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In honor of the latest Marvel release Thor, I present to you with my own retrospective of previously released Marvel films. Now before you go asking yourself &#8220;Where&#8217;s such classics as Howard the Duck and the 80s Punisher?&#8221; So let me first establish that I will only be discussing films produced and co-produced by Marvel [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In honor of the latest Marvel release <i>Thor</i>, I present to you with my own retrospective of previously released Marvel films. Now before you go asking yourself &#8220;Where&#8217;s such classics as <i>Howard the Duck</i> and the 80s  <i>Punisher</i>?&#8221; So let me first establish that I will only be discussing films produced and co-produced by Marvel Studios from the late 90s to present. That&#8217;s basically when all this superhero hype began anyways, so let&#8217;s get to it. </p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Blade  (1998)</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/2.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-gneAAh5ldtg/TcWbP0wnmRI/AAAAAAAAB-s/ueUVbyq7e7A/s1600/Blade_movie.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 149px; height: 200px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-gneAAh5ldtg/TcWbP0wnmRI/AAAAAAAAB-s/ueUVbyq7e7A/s200/Blade_movie.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5604056007495358738" /></a>Interesting film to start off the retrospective as in the comics Blade was as some nerds might say &#8220;Totally second tier.&#8221; He was never really a breakout character and was for most part just featured in obscure 70s horror titles like <i>The Tomb of Dracula</i> and <i>Vampire Tales</i>. Though somehow he started to get attention in the 90s which I suppose built up a big enough fan base to justify this movie. </p>
<p>But who is Blade? Well he&#8217;s a half-human/half-vampire who protects humans from bad vampires (which basically means all vampires). He works alongside a crusty old man named Whistler (Kris Kristofferson) who acts as Blade&#8217;s mentor and weapons technician, though he mostly just complains, &#8220;God Damn it Blade!&#8221; So Blade fights this evil vampire syndicate headed by Stephen Dorff and lots of stuff blows up.</p>
<p>The action is satisfying as you can actually tell what&#8217;s going on, but the story lacks emotion and all the characters are too one dimensional. Yeah I get it, Blade is like all cool and stuff, but he really doesn&#8217;t have much of a personality (Not necessarily Wesley Snipes fault). It&#8217;s more or less forgettable light entertainment that could&#8217;ve really benefitted from some more humor and stronger characters. </p>
<p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">X-Men (2000)</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/--Xb6yHSNvmE/TcWbZLXc-uI/AAAAAAAAB-0/agbD5OV-eGc/s1600/XMen1poster.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 135px; height: 200px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/--Xb6yHSNvmE/TcWbZLXc-uI/AAAAAAAAB-0/agbD5OV-eGc/s200/XMen1poster.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5604056168182643426" /></a>Though <i>Blade</i> was technically the first Marvel Studios film I think most identity this as the first REAL Marvel film and as the film that more or less started the whole superhero craze. With so many different characters and stories throughout it&#8217;s run, an <i>X-Men</i> movie could of been a complete mess if not handled properly. Luckily Brian Singer (<i>Usual Suspects</i>) was behind the camera and took what could of been a potentially ridiculous movie and turned it into a great character driven story. </p>
<p>Most of the film revolves around Wolverine which is fine considering Hugh Jackman truly shines in the role. Patrick Stewart and Ian McKellen are also standouts as both Professor X. and Magneto respectively. A handful of characters are miscast (Storm, Cyclops, Sabretooth) but some solid action makes up for that. I also praise <i>X-Men&#8217;s</i> attempts to stay grounded in reality, who knew you could hit on deeper themes like civil rights in a superhero movie? Anyhow this film will always have a place in my heart as the first superhero movie that miraculously felt genuine. </p>
<p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Blade II (2002)</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-sd8RtkReYyw/TcWbfdOKfiI/AAAAAAAAB-8/B2rjh1QCjck/s1600/Blade_II_movie.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 158px; height: 200px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-sd8RtkReYyw/TcWbfdOKfiI/AAAAAAAAB-8/B2rjh1QCjck/s200/Blade_II_movie.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5604056276054736418" /></a><br />With such little interest in the first installment I didn&#8217;t have high hopes for yet another hack and slash vampire action movie. Though one thing I overlooked until many years later was that this wasn&#8217;t just another stupid action movie, it was a stupid action movie directed by Guillermo Del Toro. Yes the same visionary filmmaker behind <i>Pan&#8217;s Labyrinth</i> and <i>The Devil&#8217;s Backbone</i> actually directed a <i>Blade</i> film and guess what? It&#8217;s actually kind of awesome. </p>
<p>Director Guillermo Del Toro and screenwriter David Goyer (Who wrote all three <i>Blades</i>) hit us this time with an all out visceral gorefest of a flick with some interesting twists and even some well crafted suspense. The characters are still dry (with the exception of a great Ron Perlman hamming it up) but at least the story is fairly engaging. </p>
<p>Basically <i>Blade II</i> is about a new race of vampire that feed not only humans, but on other vampires. Not to mention these new vampires are like crack addicts and have to feed constantly. So Blade has to team up with the vampires to fight the super vampires. Yes I know that&#8217;s probably the stupidest thing you&#8217;ve ever heard, but in the context of <i>Blade</i> it&#8217;s all kinds of awesome. I suppose it just goes to show what a talented filmmaker can do with a less than spectaculcar franchise.</p>
<p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Spider-Man (2002)</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-ciHq6afJlek/TcWb-lnRIuI/AAAAAAAAB_E/o9zXW3y62ko/s1600/Spider-Man2002Poster.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 136px; height: 200px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-ciHq6afJlek/TcWb-lnRIuI/AAAAAAAAB_E/o9zXW3y62ko/s200/Spider-Man2002Poster.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5604056810883457762" /></a>With the exception of <i>Episode I</i> this was probably the most excited I&#8217;d ever been for a movie. Finally a chance to see my favorite web slinger up on the big screen! I was definitely nervous as this could of easily been a disaster (early stills of the Green Goblin weren&#8217;t that encouraging) though somehow Sam Raimi pulled it off. The cast was great, the effects were eye popping and it even had a cameo from Bruce Campbell! There were definitely changes made that soured my cider such as the absence of the web shooters and no Gwen Stacy, which basically screwed up the continuity of the comics right off the bat, those these were small complaints. All in all it was great fun and cinched the future of Marvel movies. </p>
<p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Daredevil (2003)</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-eq8EKCSaxLw/TcWcHRppPFI/AAAAAAAAB_M/J0_WDH2fVj0/s1600/Daredevil_poster.JPG"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 133px; height: 200px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-eq8EKCSaxLw/TcWcHRppPFI/AAAAAAAAB_M/J0_WDH2fVj0/s200/Daredevil_poster.JPG" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5604056960143539282" /></a>By Day he&#8217;s Matt Murdock; a blind lawyer living in New York City&#8217;s Hell Kitchen but when night falls he becomes &#8220;Daredevil!&#8221; A man in a red devil costume who fights New York City gangsters with a billy club! I guess it&#8217;s not surprising this was a critical failure, but if you ask me this film is actually kind of fun. </p>
<p>Released at the height of Ben Affleck hate-dom (mainly because of his marriage to JLO but also for a string of underwhelming flicks like <i>Pearl Harbor</i> and <i>Gigli</i>) <i>Daredevil</i> was sort of doomed from the start. He&#8217;s an unusual character and it had to be a hard sell for audiences. Imagine if someone went up to you and said &#8220;Wanna see this movie about a blind crime fighting lawyer who has super senses?&#8221; I mean it&#8217;s ridiculous, but being that I was a Daredevil fan going in I went in with an open mind and actually enjoyed this movie. </p>
<p>I only wish <i>Daredevil</i> could of been taken more seriously. I enjoyed the humor and action but it&#8217;s too lightweight. The cast was decent enough featuring; Ben Affleck, Jennifer Garner, Michael Clarke Duncan (although miscast), Colin Farrell, Jon Favreau, and Joe Pantoliano; but it&#8217;s still flawed by it&#8217;s own awkwardness. Seems to me that this movie so desperately wanted to be Spider-Man that it took a subtle character way too over the top. </p>
<p>So in retrospect Daredevil probably should have gotten a better movie. He&#8217;s always been a fascinating character with some great comics. He&#8217;s a solemn and low key figure that would of really shined in a darker and more dramatic film. All the great images in the comics of Daredevil perched next to gargoyles overlooking churches, but instead we got a movie staring Ben Affleck and Colin Farrell with a tattoo on his head, oh well it could of been worse. </p>
<p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">X2 (2003)</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-efmzG2isAQI/TcWcYIuPNvI/AAAAAAAAB_U/oCysCeBurbk/s1600/X2_poster_version2.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 136px; height: 200px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-efmzG2isAQI/TcWcYIuPNvI/AAAAAAAAB_U/oCysCeBurbk/s200/X2_poster_version2.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5604057249804662514" /></a>With all the setup out of the way <i>X2</i> was free to take the franchise to next level with more characters and surprisingly, more drama. Non-mutant William Stryker (Brian Cox) takes the reigns as lead villain this time with a plan to kill all the mutants and it&#8217;s up to the <i>X-Men</i>, with the addition of fan favorite Nightcrawler (Alan Cummings) to whoop his ass.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s all the greatness of the original kicked up a notch, though I have a few complaints. I&#8217;m disappointed to see Halle Berry pushed to the front of every scene after becoming a breakout star as I&#8217;ve never been that big on her interpretation of Storm. Also what happened to Cyclops? His role is practically nonexistent in <i>X2</i> which is a real insult to the comics. Granted James Marsden isn&#8217;t that strong in the role, they probably should of just re-casted the role. In the comics Cyclops was second in command, so stop screwing him over. That all aside this is still a might fine action flick. </p>
<p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Hulk (2003)</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/2.5.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-u8FGKZHGyS8/TcWcryfivVI/AAAAAAAAB_c/iTqZZm76WzA/s1600/Hulk_movie.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 134px; height: 200px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-u8FGKZHGyS8/TcWcryfivVI/AAAAAAAAB_c/iTqZZm76WzA/s200/Hulk_movie.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5604057587434831186" /></a>The Hulk is one of my favorite marvel characters because well, he&#8217;s a big monster that fights evil! He&#8217;s like something out of a Universal monster movie with his Jekyll and Hyde like persona and frightening appearance. Yeah he&#8217;s strong and he smashes stuff, but there&#8217;s also a lot under the surface in Bruce Banner&#8217;s pain, so I respect that Ang Lee attempted to touch on that… It&#8217;s just too bad he had to delve into that aspect for 138 minutes. </p>
<p>Hulk may be a monster but he&#8217;s still a superhero and you never really feel that in Ang Lee&#8217;s <i>Hulk</i>. The action scenes are far too few and in-between and after awhile you just get restless. It doesn&#8217;t help that Eric Bana is as exciting as a wet noodle with Jennifer Connelly being equally forgettable. Nick Nolte is bizarre as Bruce&#8217;s absent minded father (something that as far as I know was never in the comics) and I&#8217;m not sure how I felt about him turning him into the Marvel character &#8220;Absorbing Man&#8221; in the last twenty or so minutes. Really the only cast member that shines is Sam Elliott who was perfectly cast as LT. Colonel &#8220;Thunderbolt&#8221; Ross. </p>
<p>Another thing that bugs me is the Hulk&#8217;s height, he&#8217;s like 15 feet tall! He can barely fit on screen with the other characters, what the hell was up with that? The CGI is good enough but it just didn&#8217;t work for me and the movie although ambitious just couldn&#8217;t capture the &#8220;super&#8221; side of the Hulk. </p>
<p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">The Punisher (2003)</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/2.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-zU9AkC3xjjw/TcWc0oV-xYI/AAAAAAAAB_k/Xvg4fdlvjpg/s1600/Punisher_ver2.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 136px; height: 200px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-zU9AkC3xjjw/TcWc0oV-xYI/AAAAAAAAB_k/Xvg4fdlvjpg/s200/Punisher_ver2.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5604057739329193346" /></a>This is actually the second <i>Punisher</i> film after the 80s Dolph Lundgren version which I&#8217;ve actually seen (Nuff said). This installment takes a more upscale Hollywood approach in a desperate attempt to be as cool as all the other more popular Marvel franchises. If you don&#8217;t really know anything about the Punisher consider yourself lucky as he&#8217;s really never been that interesting. Basically he was created as a villain for an issue of <i>Spider-Man</i> and somehow he got his own series, so woop de doo for him.</p>
<p><i>The Punisher</i> is about Frank Castle; a recently retired FBI agent who&#8217;s been targeted by powerful Tampa crime boss Howard Saint (John Travolta) after Frank killed his son or something, I don&#8217;t remember. So Frank&#8217;s chillin&#8217; at his retirement party with his wife, son, and dad (Roy Scheider) and then Howard&#8217;s boys come by and kill a bunch of people. Frank&#8217;s wife and son try to escape but they get run over by a truck and Roy Scheider dies too, but probably says something inspiring before he dies. So Frank becomes &#8220;The Punisher&#8221; and delivers vengeance in the only way he knows how&#8230; Bang, bang, boom! </p>
<p><i>The Punisher</i> is actually fairly tongue and cheek for a movie about a guy who straight up murders people. Tom Jane stars and seems to have fun in the role. Jane hasn&#8217;t had the greatest track recor, but I&#8217;ve always liked him, I mean he&#8217;s just trying to get his kids back (wink, wink). I actually liked a handful of the silly characters and for the most part it&#8217;s dumb fun. So even in if <i>The Punisher</i> lacks originality, has lazy plotting, and no real point, it&#8217;s still remotely watchable. </p>
<p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Spider-Man 2 (2004)</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.5.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-ekwJxmw93VY/TcWdV4Tin5I/AAAAAAAAB_s/B0qG_5ENaPU/s1600/Spider-Man2002Poster.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 136px; height: 200px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-ekwJxmw93VY/TcWdV4Tin5I/AAAAAAAAB_s/B0qG_5ENaPU/s200/Spider-Man2002Poster.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5604058310549610386" /></a>Now that we were all familiar with Spidey&#8217;s origin, <i>Spider-Man 2</i> upped the ante with bigger effects and even more at stake for Peter Parker. Pete&#8217;s relationship with Mary Jane is in the gutter, he&#8217;s living in the equivalent of a gutter and now he&#8217;s got Dock Ock (my favorite Spidey villain played marvelously by Alfred Molina) up in his shit. It&#8217;s basically the same movie again with a different villain but minus the weight of an origin story. <i>SP2</i> is free to have fun but still has a heart and that&#8217;s why it&#8217;s my favorite superhero flick  only after DC&#8217;s <i>The Dark Knight</i>. </p>
<p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Blade: Trinity (2004)</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/1.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-jgKpXAkQoYs/TcWdd-cEKcI/AAAAAAAAB_0/Gd6sTRZ8nk8/s1600/Blade_Trinity_poster.JPG"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 135px; height: 200px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-jgKpXAkQoYs/TcWdd-cEKcI/AAAAAAAAB_0/Gd6sTRZ8nk8/s200/Blade_Trinity_poster.JPG" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5604058449634929090" /></a>Because the world apparently needed a third <i>Blade</i> (more like turd) we got  <i>Blade: Trinity</i> and yes, it&#8217;s as bad as it sounds. So this time around we have vampires led by Parker Posey (strangely enough) that have decided to resurrect who else but Count Dracula, who&#8217;s apparently been lying dormant an Iraqi cave for thousands of years because it&#8217;s convenient for the plot. Meanwhile Blade is apprehended by the FBI while Whistler kills himself in an explosion to avoid being taken in. Not like it really matters though as Whistler really didn&#8217;t have much to do aside from shouting &#8220;God damn it Blade!&#8221; So Blade is interrogated by a psychologist played by another Christopher Guest favorite in John Michael Higgins but uh oh! He&#8217;s a human working for vampire Parker Posey and he&#8217;s turning Blade over to the vamps! Why Blade is not killed in this scene is beyond me, I guess they had to wait for Dracula to kill him because it would be cool. Then in a completely implausible scene, Ryan Reynolds and Jessica Biel break into the FBI headquarters to rescue Blade.</p>
<p>Back at the good guy hideout (where are all these hideouts?) we find out that Jessica Biel is Whistler&#8217;s daughter, how cliche is that? I mean what&#8217;s with third installments always being family affairs? Oh yeah, these people are vampire hunters and one of them is Patton Oswalt as the geeky gadgets guy, awesome?</p>
<p>The rest of the movie is basically a bunch of high adrenaline fights and chases to techno music, but really it&#8217;s nothing we haven&#8217;t already seen. Basically what makes this movie so bad is a lack of originality and some truly awful characters. Dominic Purcell is probably the worst as Dracula, but Ryan Reynolds is equally annoying playing Dane Cook if he hunted vampires. Also Triple H co-stars as a vampire that delivers such gems as &#8220;&#8221;They pretty much fuckin&#8217; ass raped us!&#8221; to name a few. Though one thing that really puzzles me is why people that hunt vampires are always so attractive? Can you imagine if there really were vampire hunters? They&#8217;d probably be morbidly obese hicks in trucker hats, now that would be a movie! </p>
<p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Elektra  (2005)</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/1.5.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-ayMUwPH23N4/TcWeKRA8aRI/AAAAAAAAB_8/YTmkxruHP88/s1600/Elektra_teaser.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 135px; height: 200px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-ayMUwPH23N4/TcWeKRA8aRI/AAAAAAAAB_8/YTmkxruHP88/s200/Elektra_teaser.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5604059210535692562" /></a>Out of all the great Marvel characters yet to be adapted for the screen; Doctor Strange, The Sub-Mariner, even the Silver Surfer, (though he would later get thrown in the &#8220;interesting&#8221; <i>Fantastic Four</i> sequel) Elektra was probably the last character that should of gotten her own movie. As if it wasn&#8217;t enough that she appeared in <i>Daredevil</i>,  I seem to clearly remember her getting killed. Though thanks to magic and other stuff that doesn&#8217;t make sense she&#8217;s back and ready to do whatever it is she does.</p>
<p>The film opens with these two criminals in a moody mansion talking about who else but Mrs. Bennifer herself. This one guy seems really paranoid that she&#8217;s coming for em but I don&#8217;t understand, doesn&#8217;t everyone think she&#8217;s dead? For whatever reason this guy thinks she isn&#8217;t and that she&#8217;s coming for them tonight. Why he thinks this I have no idea, I don&#8217;t even know why Elektra does come after him, she just hates smug guys in suits who sit around with guns in moody mansions. </p>
<p>Later Elektra is hired to wait out at this lake house to await further instructions regarding her next hit. While awaiting these instructions she spends most of her time training and having painful flashbacks of her childhood, because that&#8217;s supposed to make her deep or something. Afterwards Elektra meets two other residents of the lake; a young girl named Abby and her father Mark with an ever changing European accent. Later they all get attacked by assassins and it&#8217;s at this point that Elektra discovers this girl is some kind of gifted warrior that she must protect or something. So at this point the film isn&#8217;t even that focused on her, where are they taking this?</p>
<p>My main problem with Elektra is I have no idea why anybody is doing anything. They all just seem to play good guys and bad guys because it&#8217;s a movie about good guys that fight bad guys. There really is no compelling story or interesting characters, though I always enjoy seeing Cary-Hiroyuki Tagawa (Shao Tsung from <i>Mortal Kombat</i>) that guys cool. I could keep going but I&#8217;m too sad, thus I highly recommend that you NOT watch <i>Elektra</i>.</p>
<p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Fantastic Four (2005)</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/2.5.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-Mo8L_Y1Jvbw/TcWeU4iw0DI/AAAAAAAACAE/-N9qYTmhQg8/s1600/Fantastic_four_poster.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 138px; height: 200px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-Mo8L_Y1Jvbw/TcWeU4iw0DI/AAAAAAAACAE/-N9qYTmhQg8/s200/Fantastic_four_poster.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5604059392945213490" /></a>At this point you might be able to tell I have a soft spot for Marvel&#8217;s most beloved franchises. I was so ecstatic for this film that I think it probably blinded me from the fact that this movie is really, really stupid. I like some of the decisions they made, but this movie is so silly that it&#8217;s really more a dumb comedy than anything else. </p>
<p>Good casting is key in a good super team movie, so right off the bat you can see there&#8217;s a weak link in this unfantastic flick… Jessica Alba. Sure she&#8217;s attractive but has she ever been good in anything ever? The rest of the F.F. casting makes sense though I&#8217;m not sure why they decided to put Michael Chiklis in such a stupid costume instead of simply going CG. But what really eats away at me is this film ruined the greatest Marvel villain of all time, Dr. Doom. Julian McMahon couldn&#8217;t of been more forgettable as what could of been the next Darth Vader. Couldn&#8217;t they of at least casted someone people had heard of? Someone like Jeremy Irons, sure he&#8217;s about twenty years too old for the part but Doom needed to be played by a master thespian. That all aside this movie is at least watchable, just a missed opportunity. </p>
<p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">X-Men: The Last Stand  (2006)</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-2QQymRJZKnA/TcWeej9qGnI/AAAAAAAACAM/fTTzAWfhXDo/s1600/X3P_003.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 135px; height: 200px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-2QQymRJZKnA/TcWeej9qGnI/AAAAAAAACAM/fTTzAWfhXDo/s200/X3P_003.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5604059559219567218" /></a>This movie was basically all about the Benjamins. With Brian Singer parting ways and Brett Ratner taking over I don&#8217;t think anyone had high expectations but hey, it&#8217;s still the <i>X-Men</i>. So let&#8217;s see they fought Magneto, then Magneto/Stryker and now they&#8217;re fighting? Oh, it&#8217;s Magneto again, so why should I care? That&#8217;s more or less the whole feeling of this installment &#8220;Why should I care?&#8221; Yeah you can cram in more characters, but why did this movie need to be made? Because people like me are stupid and people like me, sigh… actually enjoy stupid stuff like this. What can I say? I love the <i>X-Men</i>. I also liked the addition of Ellen Page as fan fav Kitty Pryde (excellent casting even if the role was small) and who doesn&#8217;t love Frasier as Beast? Double awesome! It&#8217;s got hella problems, but so does America and that&#8217;s why this movie was a hit.</p>
<p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Ghost Rider  (2007)</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/0.5.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-L4bIEITKwOY/TcWe_4w5FmI/AAAAAAAACAU/GLbxpGihZZA/s1600/GhostRiderBigPoster.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 135px; height: 200px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-L4bIEITKwOY/TcWe_4w5FmI/AAAAAAAACAU/GLbxpGihZZA/s200/GhostRiderBigPoster.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5604060131738850914" /></a>If all the Marvel films were students this would be the one that rides the short bus. I apologize for that remark but this truly is one of the dumbest big budget movies I&#8217;ve ever seen. Rarely have I ever been so desperate to flee a theater than the day I witnessed the abomination that is <i>Ghost RIder</i>. I&#8217;ll try and be brief as the mere thought of <i>Ghost Rider</i> makes me want to vomit with rage. So it&#8217;s about a stunt motorcyclist named Johnny Blaze (Nicolas Cage with CGI abs) who sells his soul to the devil to fight crime. Becoming the spirit like &#8220;Ghost Rider&#8221; Blaze wages a battle through plot holes and bad acting to try and defeat the evil Blackheart (Wes Bentley). You know a movie is bad when you don&#8217;t even want to think about it so I&#8217;ll leave it at this&#8230; You have been warned!</p>
<p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Spider-Man 3  (2007)</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-ZmGtH9XSfA0/TcWfI2sjUxI/AAAAAAAACAc/uNP8BCGmHds/s1600/Spider-Man_3%252C_International_Poster.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 134px; height: 200px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-ZmGtH9XSfA0/TcWfI2sjUxI/AAAAAAAACAc/uNP8BCGmHds/s200/Spider-Man_3%252C_International_Poster.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5604060285802599186" /></a>So I&#8217;ve already established I&#8217;m a softie for Stan Lee&#8217;s greatest creations. Just the fact that these movies keep getting made makes me overjoyed, so maybe that&#8217;s blinding whatever common sense I may have but I&#8217;m not gonna lie… I like <i>Spider-Man 3</i>. Is it cheesy? Yeah. Is the script a mess? More or less. Is it sometimes funny for the wrong reasons? A little bit… Is it entertaining? Hell yeah! At this point in the series I&#8217;d grown so attached to the characters that I suppose I was willing to see them go through anything, even if it was silly. </p>
<p>Sandman, Venom, Harry Osborn on a glider, and a moody Peter Parker with an identity crisis all duking it out at the same time? Yeah it was a little much and in the grand scheme of things this overpacked plot was probably the film&#8217;s downfall, but I still like a lot of the little things. I mean Sandman is underdeveloped but at the same time, it&#8217;s Sandman… I&#8217;m watching a movie with Sandman? Is this real life? Sam Raimi may of gotten carried awa, but I think his heart was in the right place. I mean he&#8217;s just another fan like the rest of us and after two films I guess he just wanted to mix it up a little, though as a wise group once said &#8220;Rock the boat, don&#8217;t rock the boat baby, rock the boat, don&#8217;t tip the boat over.&#8221; I don&#8217;t even know what I&#8217;m saying anymore.</p>
<p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer (2007)</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/2.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-1txnhL5Vir8/TcWfTsDhpKI/AAAAAAAACAk/wwDRuaj1VGo/s1600/Fantastic_Four_2_Poster.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 135px; height: 200px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-1txnhL5Vir8/TcWfTsDhpKI/AAAAAAAACAk/wwDRuaj1VGo/s200/Fantastic_Four_2_Poster.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5604060471924728994" /></a>It was a real shame that Marvel really blew it on the <i>F.F</i> franchise, but they just had to bring down Silver Surfer as well. Though Silver Surfer certainly popped up a lot in the <i>F.F</i> comic series he was just as a respectable hero in his own solo comic. The real downer here is that because this movie was stupid, people will never get to really know how cool Silver Surfer is. Any mention of Silver Surfer will ultimately lead to this movie which has forever tainted his legacy. I mean this movie isn&#8217;t an abomination like <i>Ghost Rider</i> or <i>Elektra</i> but it&#8217;s not a fair representation of the quality characters being featured. The action is good, the effects are nice, but the dramatic execution is terrible and ultimately this was the final nail in the coffin for Tim Story&#8217;s <i>F.F.</i> films. I only hope this film gets a legitimate remake in the years to come. </p>
<p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Punisher: War Zone (2008)</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/1.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-hiiWfKfJwZg/TcWf8QNZPKI/AAAAAAAACAs/PIp9xvkDv1E/s1600/Punisherwarzoneteaser.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 134px; height: 200px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-hiiWfKfJwZg/TcWf8QNZPKI/AAAAAAAACAs/PIp9xvkDv1E/s200/Punisherwarzoneteaser.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5604061168824564898" /></a>Since we all needed another movie about a guy who kills people with guns because he&#8217;s mad, we got <i>Punisher: War Zone</i>. Maybe it&#8217;s a sequel, maybe it&#8217;s a reboot, but all we really know is that watching this movie is probably worse than actually being shot.</p>
<p>Frank Castle is back and more of a ripoff of Batman than ever in this gritty and completely unappealing action flick. This time &#8217;round Frank faces off against a group of mobsters who have about as much depth as the Bazooka Brothers and do bad guy stuff because… Because they&#8217;re bad guys. So Frank starts brutally murdering each one cause he hates bad guys, but wuh oh! He accidentally kills an undercover cop! So he&#8217;s all sad and starts stalking the cop&#8217;s wife (Julie Benz from <i>Dexter</i>) and decides he&#8217;s got to protect her cause, I don&#8217;t know the bad guys wanna kill her for some reason. </p>
<p>Frank&#8217;s only real friend is Wayne Knight, who supplies him with guns in his laboratory underneath a subway system. Irishman Ray Stevenson (Who&#8217;s actually in the upcoming <i>Thor</i>) plays the emotionless and undeniably dull Frank &#8220;The Punisher&#8221; Castle, but basically every character is some kind of stereotype. </p>
<p>Something I find really distracting about all this is how similar it is to Batman, check this out;<br />- Both characters became vigilantes after family members were murdered.<br />- Both are equally feared by crooks and cops and considered a menace.<br />- They both only come out at night<br />- The Punisher fights a guy named Jigsaw (Dominic West) who looks a lot like Two-Face.<br />- Both have secret lairs, both wear black, and it goes on.</p>
<p>The only difference is Batman has depth and principles, The Punisher just teaches us that violence solves everything and that it&#8217;s okay to kill hundreds of people if you&#8217;re pissed off. </p>
<p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Iron Man (2008)</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-3TqLwhSsq70/TcWgFUf9ZNI/AAAAAAAACA0/smFlZCEYvaU/s1600/Ironmanposter.JPG"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 135px; height: 200px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-3TqLwhSsq70/TcWgFUf9ZNI/AAAAAAAACA0/smFlZCEYvaU/s200/Ironmanposter.JPG" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5604061324594996434" /></a>Here we go, a safe dependable character with a great cast and crew. <i>Iron Man</i> came just in time, revitalizing interest in Marvel films while simultaneously launching the proposal for an <i>Avengers</i> movie. I think we&#8217;ve all seen <i>Iron Man</i> so I wont bore you with plot details. All I&#8217;ll say is that this an excellent performance from Downey and perfectly balances humor with action. Not to mention it introduced many of the uninformed to the awesomness of the character of <i>Iron Man</i>, instantly cementing him as one of Marvel&#8217;s top players.</p>
<p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">The Incredible Hulk (2008)</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-UyeQeHskwWA/TcWglw41EsI/AAAAAAAACA8/89iazYA54N8/s1600/Hulk_poster.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 135px; height: 200px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-UyeQeHskwWA/TcWglw41EsI/AAAAAAAACA8/89iazYA54N8/s200/Hulk_poster.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5604061881971315394" /></a>Now this is more like the Hulk! From the perfect casting of Mr Duality himself (Edward Norton), the inclusion of another big baddie (Tim Roth) and even several homages to the TV series, this was pitch perfect. Presented as both a sequel and a reboot, <i>The Incredible Hulk</i> finally gives us the quality action that was lacking in Ang Lee&#8217;s snoozer. Perhaps the story is a little lightweight, but there&#8217;s plenty of humor and excitement to make up for it. </p>
<p>I have a few complaints but they&#8217;re fairly minor. For one, why is the Hulk still so damned tall? He&#8217;s not 15ft but he&#8217;s still gotta be at least 10ft, I don&#8217;t get it. Hmm, that&#8217;s all that&#8217;s coming to me as of now, so I guess I don&#8217;t have as many complaints as I thought. It&#8217;s just too bad that Edward Norton won&#8217;t be returning to this role in the upcoming <i>Avengers</i>. </p>
<p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">X-Men Origins: Wolverine (2009)</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/1.5.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-ryjv7AygeJo/TcWhB5hN7LI/AAAAAAAACBE/N3aN3-OpRW4/s1600/Wolverinetheatricalposter_a.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 135px; height: 200px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-ryjv7AygeJo/TcWhB5hN7LI/AAAAAAAACBE/N3aN3-OpRW4/s200/Wolverinetheatricalposter_a.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5604062365324537010" /></a><br />I already reviewed this on the blog once I didn&#8217;t like it. Who would of thought you could surround such a great character like Wolverine with so much shit? Jackman&#8217;s good, but this film feels more like a contest to cram in as many <i>X-Men</i> characters as possible, while simultaneously ruining all of them. Because of this film we&#8217;ll probably never get to see favorites like Gambit or Deadpool in a good movie and that&#8217;s a damn shame. This film took so many liberties with the property that it became something so fowl I cringe to look upon a it. I only pray that the second installment will due everyone&#8217;s favorite Canadian suerhero justice. </p>
<p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Iron Man 2 (2010)</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-4LB9Pwmmv3Y/TcWhLfw47eI/AAAAAAAACBM/aO82eSTjVfA/s1600/Iron_Man_2_poster.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 136px; height: 200px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-4LB9Pwmmv3Y/TcWhLfw47eI/AAAAAAAACBM/aO82eSTjVfA/s200/Iron_Man_2_poster.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5604062530209639906" /></a>With the upcoming <i>Avengers</i> flick I&#8217;m not sure they needed another <i>Iron Man</i> flick, but it was fun to watch, even if it did kill a few braincells. <i>Iron Man 2</i> tries to up the ante as many sequels often do, but for some reason it just felt to jumbled and busy. Too many characters and too many plotlines, it lacked the breezy looseness of the original. Downey is just as good as ever as is Gwyneth Paltrow and newcomer Mickey Rourke, it was just a little sloppy. Let&#8217;s hope that <i>The Avengers</i> movie doesn&#8217;t get too out of hand.</p>
<p>Wow is that it? There&#8217;s probably something else that will come to me later, but I&#8217;m starting to lose it. Anyways I hope you all enjoy a Marvel infused summer as I know I will, excelsior!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=896</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>105</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Living in Perfect Harmony</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=895</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=895#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 23:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=895</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pokémon White Version Right before the Nintendo 3DS came out (remember that?) another big Nintendo product was released in America: the latest Pokemon games. Pokemon Black and White versions bring the series into its official fifth generation and feature the most changes the series has seen yet. But is that enough, or has Pokemon become [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><i>Pokémon White Version</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-G2tvkSJ8JuQ/TcHdaECOXiI/AAAAAAAABBs/6sio6KTt8us/s1600/White_box_EN-US.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="178" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-G2tvkSJ8JuQ/TcHdaECOXiI/AAAAAAAABBs/6sio6KTt8us/s200/White_box_EN-US.png" width="200" /></a></div>
<p>Right before the Nintendo 3DS came out (remember that?) another big Nintendo product was released in America: the latest Pokemon games. <i>Pokemon Black </i>and <i>White </i>versions bring the series into its official fifth generation and feature the most changes the series has seen yet. But is that enough, or has Pokemon become too stagnant for its own good?</p>
<p>Tell me if you&#8217;ve heard this one before: you wake up one day and find out its finally time for you to go see the local professor to get your own Pokedex and your first Pokemon. You venture out into the world, battling your way through eight Pokemon gyms to earn badges so you can go challenge the Elite Four and the reigning Pokemon champion. But your real motivation is to catch all the Pokemon in the world, because, uh, that would be cool, I guess.</p>
<p>The story of <i>Pokemon White Version </i>does change from the traditional campaign in some interesting ways. You have two rivals now, both lifelong friends of yours that always encourage you and even work with you on a few occasions. The evil group you keep running into is the most interesting aspect about this game, they&#8217;re basically the Pokemon version of PETA, who say its wrong that people capture Pokemon and make them fight. I&#8217;m glad someone finally said that, but the main characters never take Team Plasma and their cause seriously, since that would ruin playing the game.</p>
<p>This game features 150 new Pokemon, you won&#8217;t see a single familiar face until you&#8217;ve completed the main story. That&#8217;s cool, I guess. Graphically, the game looks the same, maybe a little better, since Pokemon sprites are now animated and the game uses some limited 3D effects. Nothing groundbreaking. What is groundbreaking is that TMs are now infinite use, a welcome change. With brand new Pokemon to catch and easy ways to fix any mistakes you make while leveling them, this is a great game for wannabe Pokemon trainers to hop on.</p>
<p>But I can&#8217;t help but feel like Pokemon needs to do something really different. This is the same basic game I played like 13 years ago. Hopefully when Pokemon makes the leap to the 3DS, or the Wii 2, Nintendo will take that opportunity to profoundly change the franchise. In the meantime, this is still a great game for anyone looking for that Pokemon experience they&#8217;ve always enjoyed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=895</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Retrospecticus: Beastie Boys</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=894</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=894#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 04:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Retrospecticus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our week of retrospecticuses continues with a look back at the career of the Beastie Boys, who&#8217;s Hot Sauce Commitee Part 2drops this week.  It&#8217;s probably not even the album that comes out this week that I&#8217;m most excited about, but still, the last time the Beasties released a proper hip-hop album was during Bush&#8217;s first [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Our week of retrospecticuses continues with a look back at the career of the Beastie Boys, who&#8217;s <em>Hot Sauce Commitee Part 2</em>drops this week.  It&#8217;s probably not even the album that comes out this week that I&#8217;m most excited about, but still, the last time the Beasties released a proper hip-hop album was during Bush&#8217;s first term.  So it&#8217;s not like I&#8217;m gonna get another chance to do this again anytime soon.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><a style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;" href="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/5.0.png"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><em>Licensed To Ill </em>(1986)</span></td>
<td width="150"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"><br />
</span></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div style="margin: 0px;"><a style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-Y-0gqpy__N4/Tb-w_7cAukI/AAAAAAAAA_Q/8Hd1w7zcv5E/s1600/licensetoill.jpg"><img src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-Y-0gqpy__N4/Tb-w_7cAukI/AAAAAAAAA_Q/8Hd1w7zcv5E/s200/licensetoill.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="197" border="0" /></a>The Beastie Boys arrived on the scene with a bit of a bang, as their debut <em>Licensed To Ill </em>was the first hip-hop album to top the Billboard album charts, and would end up being the top selling hip-hop album of the decade.  What made the Beasties so accessible to so many people including non-hip-hop fans was that they were willing to mix elements of hard rock with old school hip-hop beats, while infusing a style and attitude that was simply one of a kind.  Also, a lot of the songs are just undeniably catchy, despite their undeniably simplistic and juvenile lyrical content.</div>
<div style="margin: 0px;"></div>
<div style="margin: 0px;"></div>
<div style="margin: 0px;">Some people even tend to think that this was the high point of the Beastie Boys career, but honestly I&#8217;ve never been that huge of a fan of <em>License To Ill</em>, although I&#8217;ll admit the album does have a loutish frat-boy charm to it.  And since John&#8217;s already done a CAT for this album, I don&#8217;t really feel the need to talk about it in further detail.</div>
<div style="margin: 0px;">
<p><strong>Favorite Tracks:</strong> &#8220;Girls&#8221;, &#8220;No Sleep Til Brooklyn&#8221;, &#8220;Brass Monkey&#8221;</p>
</div>
<div style="margin: 0px;"></div>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div style="margin: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><em>Paul&#8217;s Boutique </em>(1989)</span></div>
</td>
<td width="150">
<div style="margin: 0px;"><img style="cursor: move;" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/5.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div style="margin: 0px;"><a style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-tS1_kSFh_QI/Tb-0S2y918I/AAAAAAAAA_U/W3xbRHZpoAw/s1600/pauls+boutique.jpg"><img src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-tS1_kSFh_QI/Tb-0S2y918I/AAAAAAAAA_U/W3xbRHZpoAw/s200/pauls+boutique.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="200" border="0" /></a>It probably says quite a bit about my hip-hop credibility that my favorite hip-hop album of all time was created by a bunch of white jews, but <em>Paul&#8217;s Boutique</em> is just that.  Trading in their mix of B-boy hip-hop and hard rock for a smorgasborg of samples ranging from Public Enemy to The Beatles to Bernard Herrmann, <em>Paul&#8217;s Boutique</em> was probably the first album that truly turned sampling in to an art form.  Of course, sampling had been around since the inception of hip-hop, but with the help of producers the Dust Brothers, the Beastie Boys created something that was oddly familiar and yet it&#8217;s own bizarre entity.</div>
<div style="margin: 0px;"></div>
<div style="margin: 0px;"></div>
<div style="margin: 0px;">In addition to this sample-fueled sound, the Beastie Boys stepped up their rap game, with rhymes that are considerably more intricate than those of their <em>Licensed To Ill</em> days, and are filled with a plethora of irreverent and often hilarious pop culture references.  Of course, many saw <em>Paul&#8217;s Boutique</em> as a bit of a dissapointment in comparison to <em>Licensed To Ill</em>, as it was a complete turn in another direction and was a commercial flop on release.  However, now it&#8217;s easy to see that <em>Paul&#8217;s Boutique</em> was years ahead of its time and is one of those hip-hop records that you just gotta check out at some point.</div>
<div style="margin: 0px;"><strong>Favorite Tracks:</strong> &#8220;Shake Your Rump&#8221;, &#8220;Egg Man&#8221;, &#8220;Looking Down The Barrel Of A Gun&#8221;<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px; font-size: x-large;"><em><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; font-size: small; font-style: normal;"><br />
</span></em></span></div>
<div style="margin: 0px;"></div>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div style="margin: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><em>Check Your Head </em>(1992)</span></div>
</td>
<td width="150">
<div style="margin: 0px;"><img style="cursor: move;" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.5.png" alt="" border="0" /></div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-CctlrDkkH78/TcBxQUFBpFI/AAAAAAAAA_Y/Q3_IxM10eN4/s1600/Check-Your-Head.jpg"><img src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-CctlrDkkH78/TcBxQUFBpFI/AAAAAAAAA_Y/Q3_IxM10eN4/s200/Check-Your-Head.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="196" border="0" /></a></div>
<p>After the misunderstood triumph of <em>Paul&#8217;s Boutique</em>, the Beasties once again decide to take their sound in another radically different direction with <em>Check Your Head</em>.  This release saw the band abandoning their previously sample-heavy sound for a more organic approach, as most of the album sees the band returning to their roots as a hardcore punk band, as they play their own instruments on most of the tracks.</p>
<p>Though there is an inkling of hardcore punk in the songs on <em>Check Your Head</em>, there&#8217;s also an undeniable influence of funk that fuses with a hard rock sound that makes songs like &#8220;Gratitude&#8221; and &#8220;Funky Boss&#8221; undeniably bad-ass.  Also, songs like &#8220;Groove Holmes&#8221; and &#8220;Pow&#8221; exploring Meters-like instrumentals that show the Beasties displaying a surprising musical prowess in laying down some funky jams.  Also, in addition to being another first rate effort from the Beastie Boys, <em>Check Your Head</em> returned the Beasties to more mainstream success with the stone-cold single &#8220;So What&#8217;cha Want&#8221;.</p>
<p><strong>Favorite Tracks:</strong> &#8220;Jimmy James&#8221;, &#8220;Gratitude&#8221;, &#8220;So What&#8217;cha Want&#8221;</p>
<div style="margin: 0px;"></div>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div style="margin: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><em>Ill Communication </em>(1994)</span></div>
</td>
<td width="150">
<div style="margin: 0px;"><img style="cursor: move;" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-O2QQMNJWtsU/TcB2SN6AorI/AAAAAAAAA_c/U--LcvAIEcg/s1600/ill-communication.jpg"><img src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-O2QQMNJWtsU/TcB2SN6AorI/AAAAAAAAA_c/U--LcvAIEcg/s200/ill-communication.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="200" border="0" /></a></div>
<p><em>Ill Communication</em> is a bit of an oddity in the Beastie Boys&#8217; discography in that for once the Beastie Boys didn&#8217;t really mix-up their sound, as the album has the same dusty funk infused sound that was seen on <em>Check Your Head</em>.  But really, I don&#8217;t have any problem with that, and it&#8217;s pretty hard to complain when the album features a few of their finest songs.</p>
<p>The most notable song of course would have to be the Beastie Boys&#8217; noisy opus &#8220;Sabotage&#8221;, a song that probably remains the finest culmination of rap and hard rock that&#8217;s ever been produced.  Really the only complaint I have about <em>Ill Communication</em> is that it probably features a few too many instrumental funk jams and not enough of the Beasties&#8217; irreverent rhymes that are seen on songs like &#8220;Sure Shot&#8221; and &#8220;Get It Together&#8221;.</p>
<p><strong>Favorite Tracks:</strong>&#8220;Sure Shot&#8221;, &#8220;Root Down&#8221;, &#8220;Sabotage&#8221;</p>
<div style="margin: 0px;"></div>
<div style="margin: 0px;"></div>
<div style="margin: 0px;"></div>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div style="margin: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><em>Hello Nasty </em>(1998)</span></div>
</td>
<td width="150">
<div style="margin: 0px;"><img style="cursor: move;" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div style="margin: 0px;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-_YXs1-N5Otw/TcDOFwWLrQI/AAAAAAAAA_g/ty8kNxSe-p4/s1600/hello-nasty-cover.jpg"><img src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-_YXs1-N5Otw/TcDOFwWLrQI/AAAAAAAAA_g/ty8kNxSe-p4/s200/hello-nasty-cover.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="178" border="0" /></a></div>
<p>This album in many ways saw the Beasties embracing the good time vibes of the late nineties, and it&#8217;s just a really fun little album.  Actually little probably isn&#8217;t the best word to describe it considering <em>Hello Nasty</em>&#8216;s 73 minute running time, so there&#8217;s definitely a fairly sprawling sound to it.</p>
<p>They really throw a little bit of everything in to the album, as there are strains of all the different sounds that the Beastie Boys have inhabited, while they also manage to mix in electronic and lounge music to the Beastie&#8217;s already diverse range of influences.  The album also features a surprising amount of singing instead of rapping on songs like &#8220;Song For The Man&#8221;, &#8220;I Don&#8217;t Know&#8221;, which have a sort of contemporary rock sound to them.  And I think it&#8217;s because of this diverse sound that the album really works, as <em>Hello Nasty</em> is almost always entertaining despite it&#8217;s lenghty running time.</p>
<p><strong>Favorite Tracks:</strong> &#8220;Super Disco Breakin&#8217;&#8221;, &#8220;Remote Control&#8221;, &#8220;Intergalactic&#8221;</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div style="margin: 0px;">
<div style="margin: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><em>To The 5 Boroughs (2004)</em></span></div>
</div>
</td>
<td width="150">
<div style="margin: 0px;">
<div style="margin: 0px;"><img style="cursor: move;" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" alt="" border="0" /></div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-mFbcQIiWYZQ/TcDSKVUOnaI/AAAAAAAAA_k/3M5CxHnl4Sw/s1600/Tothe5boroughscorrectartwork.jpg"><img src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-mFbcQIiWYZQ/TcDSKVUOnaI/AAAAAAAAA_k/3M5CxHnl4Sw/s200/Tothe5boroughscorrectartwork.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="200" border="0" /></a></div>
<p>After 1998&#8242;s <em>Hello Nasty</em>, the Beasties went a long time without releasing new music, and in that time a lot had changed in their beloved NYC.  So it&#8217;s not surprising that the Beasties paid tribute to New York in the album&#8217;s title and throughout the album, especially on the track &#8220;An Open Letter To NYC&#8221;.</p>
<p>And because <em>To The 5 Boroughs</em> shows the Beastie Boys six years removed from their last album and almost two decades from their debut, the Beasties seem pretty content with embracing their elder statesman of hip-hop persona, rather than trying to be on the cutting edge.  But I think it&#8217;s this interest in dancing to the beat of their own funky drummer that has kept the Beastie Boys relevant, when most hip-hop artists stick around for only a few years before fading due to the ever changing trends of the genre.  <em>To The 5 Boroughs</em> might not see the Beastie Boys sounding quite as vital or innovative as in the early days, but it still sees them thriving in the kind of old-school hip-hop that has always been at the heart of their sound, and that&#8217;s alright with me.</p>
<p>Favorite Tracks: &#8220;Ch-Ch-Check It Out&#8221;, &#8220;Right Right Now Now&#8221;, &#8220;Triple Trouble&#8221;</p>
<div style="margin: 0px;">
<div style="margin: 0px;"></div>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div style="margin: 0px;">
<div style="margin: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><em>The Mix-Up </em>(2007)</span></div>
</div>
</td>
<td width="150">
<div style="margin: 0px;">
<div style="margin: 0px;"><img src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.0.png" alt="" border="0" /></div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-cmRPvduojcE/TcDV9eLf39I/AAAAAAAAA_o/a7XqjDF9pKU/s1600/themixup.jpg"><img src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-cmRPvduojcE/TcDV9eLf39I/AAAAAAAAA_o/a7XqjDF9pKU/s200/themixup.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="200" border="0" /></a></div>
<p>I wasn&#8217;t really sure whether to include this album since I&#8217;ve hardly spent any time listening to it, and I don&#8217;t really have much to say about it.  But anyways, on <em>Check Your Head</em> and <em>Ill Communication</em> there were a number of instrumental tracks that sounded heavily inspired by The Meters&#8217; organ-fueled brand of funk, and I guess they decided to pursue nothing but that sound over the course of <em>The Mix-Up</em>.  So if you&#8217;re looking for some of the Beasties&#8217; tasty rhymes, this obviously isn&#8217;t the album for you since it&#8217;s an entirely instrumental album.  I mean it&#8217;s fine for what it is, but it&#8217;s not really to the type of thing I want to listen to when I&#8217;m in the mood for The Beastie Boys.  But with <em>Hot Sauce Committee Part Two </em>coming out today, we finally get to see the Beastie Boys once again laying down some funky fresh rhymes.</p>
<p><strong>Favorite Tracks:</strong> &#8220;B For My Name&#8221;, &#8220;Electric Worm&#8221;, &#8220;Off The Grid&#8221;</p>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=894</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mission: In-Freaking-Sanity</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=893</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=893#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 10:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fast Five Since taking over the franchise with Tokyo Drift, director Justin Lin has done an amazing job developing the mythology of this ridiculous series. Things have gotten so insane that Fast Five is basically an Ocean&#8217;s Eleven-style heist movie. That&#8217;s right the gang&#8217;s all here: Dom, Brian, Mia, Han, Roman, Tej, Tego, Rico and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><i>Fast Five</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-CuZGIqSSTW0/Tb6Enn4nJpI/AAAAAAAABBo/V4Pm2P4vMtY/s1600/Fast_Five_poster.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-CuZGIqSSTW0/Tb6Enn4nJpI/AAAAAAAABBo/V4Pm2P4vMtY/s320/Fast_Five_poster.jpg" width="216" /></a></div>
<p>Since taking over the franchise with <i>Tokyo Drift</i>, director Justin Lin has done an amazing job developing the mythology of this ridiculous series. Things have gotten so insane that <i>Fast Five </i>is basically an <i>Ocean&#8217;s Eleven</i>-style heist movie. That&#8217;s right the gang&#8217;s all here: Dom, Brian, Mia, Han, Roman, Tej, Tego, Rico and Gisele. What&#8217;s that? Those name&#8217;s mean nothing to you? Well, go read the <i>Fast and the Furious </i>retrospecticus if you want. You don&#8217;t really have to though, because <i>Fast Five </i>stands enough on it&#8217;s own that you could probably appreciate it even if it was the first movie in the series you saw. And you definitely should see it.</p>
<p>Dom, Mia and Brian are on the run after busting Dom out. They&#8217;re hiding in Rio de Janeiro just trying to survive when their old buddy Vince shows up and offers them a job. Things go south pretty quick and soon enough American super agent Luke Hobbs (The Rock) is on the hunt for Dom and his team. So Dom decides it&#8217;s time for one last huge job, after which everyone will disappear. How do you do a job like that? You bring in the dream team.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s kind of amazing about <i>Fast Five </i>is how little it has in common with the rest of the franchise. Yes, these guys&#8217; specialty is racing, but the film actually opts to <i>not </i>show a gratuitous race sequence. On the other hand, what we do get are a few harrowing chase scenes, including one on foot and the totally insane finally heist chase. It&#8217;s got to be seen to be believed. The movie has plenty of gunfighting and even the long-awaited fist fight between Vin Diesel and The Rock. That might have been the most muscular scene since the arm wrestling in <i>Predator</i>.</p>
<p>I know there&#8217;s going to be plenty of movies to keep everyone entertained this summer, but I think <i>Fast Five </i>is a great place to start. It&#8217;s long but it never feels like it. The starts do well enough that you won&#8217;t hate them, or feel disappointed. The action is top-notch. This is the least car porny, bromantic entry in the franchise and an excellent action movie, I don&#8217;t care who you are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=893</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Retrospecticus: The Fast and the Furious</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=892</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=892#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 10:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Retrospecticus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s the eternal question: how can there really be five The Fast and the Furious movies? I thought that first movie was just a big long ad for NOS (it was). How can a franchise based on car fetishism and bro love become one of the longest-running in recent cinema history? Honestly, I don&#8217;t know. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the eternal question: how can there really be five <i>The Fast and the Furious </i>movies? I thought that first movie was just a big long ad for NOS (it was). How can a franchise based on car fetishism and bro love become one of the longest-running in recent cinema history? Honestly, I don&#8217;t know. But I have seen them all now, so I can at least tell you how I feel about them.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><i>The Fast and the Furious </i>(2001)</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-VcQumitlpxM/Tb5xIeiNQpI/AAAAAAAABBY/sWjezD44DW4/s1600/Fast_and_the_furious_poster.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-VcQumitlpxM/Tb5xIeiNQpI/AAAAAAAABBY/sWjezD44DW4/s200/Fast_and_the_furious_poster.jpg" width="133" /></a></div>
<p>The first entry in the franchise had more in common with <i>Point Break </i>than the 1955 from which it stole its title. Its a hyper macho story of Brian O&#8217;Conner (Paul Walker), an undercover cop who infiltrates the Los Angeles street racing scene in the hopes of finding the crew responsible for a string of high-speed semi hijackings. Brian falls in with Dom (Vin Diesel) and his team, featuring Vince, who distrusts Brian, Dom&#8217;s girlfriend, Letty (Michelle Rodriguez) and Dom&#8217;s sister, Mia (Jordana Brewster). Everything seems great for Brian: the racing is fun, Mia seems to be into him and Dom quickly becomes a good friend. But after getting the wrong guys arrested, Brian has to face the reality: it&#8217;s Dom and his family that have been ripping off the truckers. It all comes to a head at &#8220;race war,&#8221; a big event for 10-second racers. Some people get killed, the heist goes bad, in the end Brian chases down Dom. Dom wrecks, but Brian lets him escape. Crazy, I know. Sure, the acting and writing might not be top notch, but the driving sequences are genuinely thrilling and the movie is just slick enough that it gets a pass in my book.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><i>2 Fast 2 Furious </i>(2003)</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/1.5.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-bgW7l1XqhMY/Tb51BhqiR1I/AAAAAAAABBc/PbR0mK0wFjU/s1600/Two_fast_two_furious_ver5.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-bgW7l1XqhMY/Tb51BhqiR1I/AAAAAAAABBc/PbR0mK0wFjU/s200/Two_fast_two_furious_ver5.jpg" width="133" /></a></div>
<p>Vin Diesel and <i>The Fast and The Furious </i>director Rob Cohen decided that making <i>xXx </i>was a good idea, so the second film in the franchise had to follow Brian&#8217;s adventures after ruining the lives of Dom and his crew. It turns out Brian&#8217;s life hasn&#8217;t been so great since he let Dom go, in fact he&#8217;s turned to a life of crime, becoming a full-time street racer. His good friend Tej (Ludacris) holds a crazy race, which Brian wins, but results in him getting captured by the Feds. They offer him a deal: forgiveness for his crimes if he can help bring down a drug lord. Brian gets the same deal for his old buddy Roman (Tyrese Gibson) and the two go deep undercover with Monica (Eva Mendes) a customs agent. Brian and Roman are hired to run money for the drug lord and consider taking it all for themselves. However, motivated by a desire to save Monica, the duo come back and save the day, deciding only to skim a little off the top. This movie is by a significant margin the worst in the franchise. It&#8217;s like the whole cast is secretly in a bad acting competition, where everyone is trying to give the worst take that actually makes it into the final film. Devon Aoki would probably win that competition, but Tyrese Gibson gives her a run for her money. It does have a certain ridiculous charm to it, at <i>2 Fast 2 Furious </i>is watchable, but I wouldn&#8217;t go out of my way to see it again.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><i>The Fast and the Furious: Tokyo Drift </i>(2006)</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Taf3sFN87X8/Tb54M510Z-I/AAAAAAAABBg/UIue3S_G5LE/s1600/Thefastandthefurioustokyodrift_bigearlyposter.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Taf3sFN87X8/Tb54M510Z-I/AAAAAAAABBg/UIue3S_G5LE/s200/Thefastandthefurioustokyodrift_bigearlyposter.jpg" width="135" /></a></div>
<p>After <i>2 Fast 2 Furious</i>, it was time to clean house. That&#8217;s usually the case when Eva Mendes is the best actor at your disposal. So the next title in the franchise abandoned the cast, the setting and even the style of racing. <i>Tokyo Drift </i>opens with Sean (Lucas Black) getting in an accident after racing Brad from <i>Home Improvement</i>. As a punishment, Sean&#8217;s sent to live in Tokyo with his father. Yeah, that&#8217;s rough. Sean is not so happy about his situation, until he befriends Twinkie (Bow Wow) and gets introduced to Tokyo&#8217;s underground racing scene. After an embarrassing loss to DK, the nephew of a yakuza boss (Sonny Chiba), he&#8217;s taken under the wing of Han, who teaches Sean in the art of drifting. Long story short, Han ends up dead and Sean defeats DK in an epic final race. As the new king of the Tokyo racing scene, everything seems great for Sean until he meets a new challenger: Han&#8217;s old friend, Dom, in a cameo appearance. <i>Tokyo Drift </i>is dumb in all the right ways, and the performances are infinitely more tolerable than in <i>2 Fast 2 Furious</i>, though still not great. The Japanese setting lends a magical element to the film, as does the preposterous style of racing. While this characterization of Japanese culture is a little frustrating, especially the insistence that &#8220;gaijin&#8221; is an insult when it&#8217;s not really, <i>Tokyo Drift </i>is a lot of stupid fun.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><i>Fast &amp; Furious </i>(2009)</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/2.5.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-oGwjFNgXxJU/Tb6ARconv0I/AAAAAAAABBk/eud1J-4-Kq0/s1600/Fast_and_Furious_Poster.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-oGwjFNgXxJU/Tb6ARconv0I/AAAAAAAABBk/eud1J-4-Kq0/s200/Fast_and_Furious_Poster.jpg" width="135" /></a></div>
<p>After mucking about with a bunch of people that were not Vin Diesel, the fourth entry in the series had to bring things back to basics. That meant basically giving it the same title as the first movie and getting the important members of the original cast to come back. <i>Fast &amp; Furious </i>opens with an insane hijacking sequence in the Dominican Republic. It turns out Dom and Letty are rolling with a new crew featuring Tego, Rico and Han &#8211; oh my God, it&#8217;s a prequel to <i>Tokyo Drift</i>! The heat is pretty intense on Dom, so he decides to split the team up. This backfires when he finds out that Letty has died back in L.A. Meanwhile, Brian has worked his way into the F.B.I. and is tracking down another drug dealer, Braga. Dom comes back to the States to avenge Letty and it quickly becomes clear he and Brian are hunting the same person. Dom and Brian join Braga&#8217;s crew, where Dom catches the eye of Gisele, Braga&#8217;s liaison. Everyone gets pissed off, but eventually Dom and Brian apprehend Braga on their own. Dom decides to turn himself in, which backfires when he is sentenced to 25 years without parole. But, when all seems lost, Dom&#8217;s prison bus is surrounded by some vicious-looking racing cars driven by Brian and Mia. <i>Fast &amp; Furious </i>is the least interesting entry in the series, it&#8217;s pretty bland. It&#8217;s just a really average summer action movie, lacking that special ridiculousness that makes this series so fun.</p>
<p>So, what happens next? How will Brian, Mia and the others get Dom out of that bus? I guess will have to find out together, in <i>Fast Five</i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=892</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Goodbyes Stink</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=891</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=891#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2011 03:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Office &#8211; &#8220;Goodbye, Michael&#8221; The weird thing about TV shows, especially long-running TV shows, is the insane amount of character development that can happen through years of new episodes and writers. Inevitably, everyone gets together, becomes friends, has fights, breaks up and so on. After its all over, it&#8217;s amazing how far characters have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><i>The Office</i> &#8211; &#8220;Goodbye, Michael&#8221;</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.5.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-rW6I_u_hdW8/TbzI6zHklcI/AAAAAAAABBU/UWsi47KXjxA/s1600/vlcsnap-2011-04-30-19h40m31s232.png" imageanchor="1"><img border="0" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-rW6I_u_hdW8/TbzI6zHklcI/AAAAAAAABBU/UWsi47KXjxA/s1600/vlcsnap-2011-04-30-19h40m31s232.png" width="430" /></a></div>
<p>The weird thing about TV shows, especially long-running TV shows, is the insane amount of character development that can happen through years of new episodes and writers. Inevitably, everyone gets together, becomes friends, has fights, breaks up and so on. After its all over, it&#8217;s amazing how far characters have come. Who would have thought, after seeing <i>The Office</i>&#8216;s pilot, that Michael would evolve into the good-natured, well-loved boss that he is today? That he would be close friends with the married Jim and Pam? That everyone would care so much when it was his time to go?</p>
<p>This should have been the series finale. Season seven of <i>The Office </i>has done a great job reinforcing Michael as the show&#8217;s driving comedic force and shown that pretty much everyone else on the show is played out. Yes, there&#8217;s the slow-moving romance between Erin and Andy, and the looming &#8220;who will be the new boss&#8221; cliffhanger, but everyone is pretty much where we want them to be. I imagine a lot of people who haven&#8217;t been paying as much attention to <i>The Office </i>these past few years could use this episode as an opportunity to leave the show forever. I wouldn&#8217;t blame them.</p>
<p>What I really appreciated about &#8220;Goodbye, Michael&#8221; was its homages to both early episodes of the American <i>Office </i>and even the British <i>Office</i>. Little touches like Michael putting the Dundie on his desk like in the opening credits were sublime. The biggest surprise for me was the scene at the airport, starting with Michael&#8217;s monologue that mirrored Tim&#8217;s from the original series. Then, just like Tim, Michael took off his microphone and shared an embrace with woman who is probably his best friend. It was a genius tribute and proof that Michael is so much more than the American David Brent.</p>
<p>The episode did spend some time developing two Andy-related plots for the future. Gabe is upset about the horrible way he was dumped last week and is lashing out at Andy, which I guess was supposed to be funny. It all paid off when Michael gave Gabe some truly terrible advice towards the end of the episode. Meanwhile, Michael has also given Andy all of his clients, and Andy goes with D&#8217;angelo to meet with one of them. Is this setting up Andy as one of the candidates to be the new boss? That&#8217;s a pretty crowded field, with Jim and Dwight already there and a ton of guest starts on the horizon.</p>
<p>So Will Ferrell&#8217;s character is starting to come apart. He&#8217;s having trouble coping with his desire to eat unhealthily and its revealed that he only got the job by saving one of Jo&#8217;s dogs. In fact, he appears to be totally incompetent. Quite the departure, since he seemed perfectly fine just a couple episodes ago. I imagine Ferrell will completely abandon his straight man style next week and return to his more wacky tendencies. That will be either terrible or hilarious. For what it&#8217;s worth, I did enjoy the conversation in the car. &#8220;Andy, do you know how to high five? Because if you do, now&#8217;s the time.&#8221;</p>
<p>So long, Steve Carell. You made this show great and it will struggle to find a voice without you. Too bad they never got Paul Rudd in there with you, so you could have acted with the whole <i>Anchorman </i>news team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=891</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Real ApocalyPS3</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=890</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=890#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2011 02:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;ve tried to take you&#8217;re PlayStation 3 online in the past week or so, you might have noticed something: you can&#8217;t. That&#8217;s because Sony was forced to shut down the PlayStation Network after a massive breach in security. According to the official blog, hackers have taken every single PSN users&#8217; name, email address, password, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-rfii5ODriUw/TbzBIEZXc0I/AAAAAAAABBQ/uNGuthdqpCg/s1600/PSN_logo_color_trans.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="189" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-rfii5ODriUw/TbzBIEZXc0I/AAAAAAAABBQ/uNGuthdqpCg/s200/PSN_logo_color_trans.png" width="200" /></a></div>
<p>If you&#8217;ve tried to take you&#8217;re PlayStation 3 online in the past week or so, you might have noticed something: you can&#8217;t. That&#8217;s because Sony was forced to shut down the PlayStation Network after a massive breach in security. According to <a href="http://blog.us.playstation.com/2011/04/26/update-on-playstation-network-and-qriocity/">the official blog</a>, hackers have taken every single PSN users&#8217; name, email address, password, location and possibly even credit card information. All 77 million PSN users are now at risk for identity theft.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s worse, we can&#8217;t play our games. I was looking forward to playing <i>Portal 2 </i>coop all last weekend, but the network was down and remains down as Sony is forced to rebuild their entire network. There are people who have online game subscriptions that can&#8217;t get online right now, this downtime is literally costing them money.</p>
<p>The identity of the hackers is unknown. Anonymous had threatened to hack Sony in the past, but it seems unlikely that it was them, since they seem more interested in sticking it to the man than stealing from the innocents. Also they&#8217;ve denied being responsible and condemned the hack, so there&#8217;s that. Even Geohot, Sony&#8217;s previous public enemy number one, said the attack made the hacking community look bad.</p>
<p>There are rumors that PSN might be up again next week. Sony has quite the hole to dig themselves out of, what with mainstream press and even congress criticizing the corporation for letting this happen. This has led a lot of people to discuss how Sony will compensate everyone at PSN who was inconvenienced by this situation. There&#8217;s even a class action lawsuit.</p>
<p>While I think that reaction (my ID was stolen? Free stuff, please) is weird, Sony is going to have to do something to bring people back to PSN. I have a PS3 and I want to play on it, so I&#8217;m certainly going to be back as soon as I can be, but I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;d be comfortable putting my credit card information in. I&#8217;m certainly not going to use my new password, which I came up with because of this hack, for my PSN account. But I already favored my 360 anyway.</p>
<p>What about the people who only play PS3? Do you expect some sort of compensation from Sony? Will you just stop going online? Has the outage affected you, or did you not notice at all? The vocal minority is rightly enraged, but I have to wonder what the common man knows and thinks about this ridiculous situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=890</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>C.A.T: Tea for the Tillerman</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=889</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=889#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 21:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cat Stevens &#8211; Tea for the Tillerman (1970) Don&#8217;t let that cheesy gnome cover fool you, this is a real gem from the golden age of the singer-songwriter. Released at the height of Cat Stevens&#8217; popularity Tea for the Tillerman is thoughtful folk rock that provides spiritual answers to life&#8217;s everyday questions. While he&#8217;ll sing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Cat Stevens &#8211; <i>Tea for the Tillerman (1970)</i></span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-BQYM5t7KNqo/Tbc15imiGaI/AAAAAAAAB-k/7SRItMIPvJo/s1600/tea-for-the-tillerman-cat-stevens.JPG"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 200px; height: 200px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-BQYM5t7KNqo/Tbc15imiGaI/AAAAAAAAB-k/7SRItMIPvJo/s200/tea-for-the-tillerman-cat-stevens.JPG" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5600003924315740578" /></a>Don&#8217;t let that cheesy gnome cover fool you, this is a real gem from the golden age of the singer-songwriter. Released at the height of Cat Stevens&#8217; popularity <i>Tea for the Tillerman</i> is thoughtful folk rock that provides spiritual answers to life&#8217;s everyday questions. While he&#8217;ll sing about love on a track like &#8220;Wild World&#8221; he&#8217;ll also take the time to subtly address social issues on tracks like &#8220;Where Do the Children Play?&#8221; The results provide a more sophisticated approach to rock, yet in an enjoyable and pleasant package. </p>
<p>&#8220;Wild World&#8221; was the track that drew myself to <i>Tea for the Tillerman</i> and is still my favorite Cat Steven&#8217;s recording. With his nasally yet pleasing English voice he can effortlessly switch between soft and aggressive tones to better suit the message. A great deal of these tracks I heard prior on the <i>Harold and Maude</i> soundtrack which was a definite push in introducing me to Cat Stevens. I suppose his music worked so well in that film as Steven&#8217;s songwriting very much so reflects both the harder moments in life and the moments we should cherish.</p>
<p>The title track of course found popularity as the theme to <i>Extras</i>, can you believe it&#8217;s only a minute and three seconds long? I suppose that&#8217;s all he needed and am sure many have  become Stevens&#8217; fans from just that one minute. Although Cat (now Yusuf Islam) would give up pop music to devote his time to Islam in the late seventies, I&#8217;m glad to hear that in the mid 2000s he returned to playing some of his old classics and to playing the same kind of music that made him so beloved in the first place. </p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;Hard Headed Woman&#8221;, &#8220;Miles from Nowhere&#8221;, &#8220;Wild World&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=889</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>111</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My Life in Holes</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=888</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=888#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 20:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Portal 2 There has been some excellent symmetry between my first year of college and my last. When I was a freshman, I remember being really excited to play Halo 3, Assassin&#8217;s Creed and The Orange Box, which included the runaway hit Portal. As a senior, I&#8217;ve gotten to play Halo: Reach, Assassin&#8217;s Creed: Brotherhood [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><i>Portal 2</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.5.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Qc3N6sbk7O0/TbHdo5MnIdI/AAAAAAAABBM/UHeKSh5npRs/s1600/Portal2cover.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Qc3N6sbk7O0/TbHdo5MnIdI/AAAAAAAABBM/UHeKSh5npRs/s320/Portal2cover.jpg" width="232" /></a></div>
<p>There has been some excellent symmetry between my first year of college and my last. When I was a freshman, I remember being really excited to play <i>Halo 3</i>, <i>Assassin&#8217;s Creed</i> and <i>The Orange Box</i>, which included the runaway hit <i>Portal</i>. As a senior, I&#8217;ve gotten to play <i>Halo: Reach</i>, <i>Assassin&#8217;s Creed: Brotherhood</i> and now <i>Portal 2</i> and they&#8217;ve all yet to disappoint. Like so many other things have.</p>
<p>While the first <i>Portal </i>ended in a way that certainly suggested a sequel, I never thought it would come. I thought the only successor to that amazing game would be references to portals or Aperture Science in <i>Half Life 2: Episode 3</i>. Instead, Valve decided to get back into that dark domain, greatly expanding its scope and narrative, along with introducing new gameplay mechanics that make the already trippy series a full on mind-bender.</p>
<p>To talk much about the story of <i>Portal 2 </i>is to deprive you of one of the great joys in gaming, so I&#8217;ll just say this game picks up were the first one left off. You&#8217;ve been in storage at Aperture Science ever since you killed the evil GLaDOS and you&#8217;re woken up by a delightful new robot friend Wheatley (Stephen Merchant) who helps you once again try to escape. Along the way you&#8217;ll learn more about the history of Aperture Science and its eccentric founder, Cave Johnson (J.K. Simmons). The story is fun to watch unfold around you in that classic Valve style, and this is easily one of the funniest games I&#8217;ve played.</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t afford to just think with portals this time around, the game has changed. Now you have to worry about lasers, light bridges, various types of goo and even anti-gravitational fields. If you&#8217;ve watched the trailers for <i>Portal 2</i>, it all looks super complex. In reality, the game does such a good job of slowly introducing these mechanics that things never seem truly daunting. Instead, you&#8217;ll just feel like the smartest little boy in the world when you figure these out on your own.</p>
<p>Of course, you&#8217;re not on your own in all of <i>Portal 2</i>. There&#8217;s an entire second campaign for two players to work their way through. In coop, you play as two lovable robots GLaDOS built to do the testing that was too dangerous for humans. Valve did a great job including in game functionality for countdowns and pointing out stuff to your partner, but for maximum enjoyment, make sure you both have mics.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s obvious the Source Engine is getting old. <i>Portal 2 </i>looks surprisingly great, but no one is going to say it&#8217;s an amazing game, graphically speaking. The worst part is the load times, which are too frequent and too long (at least on the PS3 version). But all that really means is that I liked <i>Portal 2 </i>so much that it really bothered me those few seconds I couldn&#8217;t spend playing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=888</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>C.A.T: The Stooges</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=887</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=887#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 03:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=887</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Stooges &#8211; The Stooges (1969) I was gonna write about Dylan&#8217;s Nashville Skyline (My second favorite Dylan album after Highway 61 Revisited) but after dragging my feet for a day or so I just wasn&#8217;t sure what to say about it, another time perhaps. Then when I noticed it was Iggy Pop&#8217;s birthday I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">The Stooges &#8211; <i>The Stooges (1969)</i></span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-afLjZiaTRmA/TbD12SLyheI/AAAAAAAAB-c/1c0hll9XZWk/s1600/the_stooges.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img alt="" border="0" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5598244649764554210" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-afLjZiaTRmA/TbD12SLyheI/AAAAAAAAB-c/1c0hll9XZWk/s200/the_stooges.jpg" style="cursor: hand; cursor: pointer; float: left; height: 200px; margin: 0 10px 10px 0; width: 200px;" /></a>I was gonna write about Dylan&#8217;s <i>Nashville Skyline</i> (My second favorite Dylan album after <i>Highway 61 Revisited</i>) but after dragging my feet for a day or so I just wasn&#8217;t sure what to say about it, another time perhaps. Then when I noticed it was Iggy Pop&#8217;s birthday I was like &#8220;Well this is a no brainer.&#8221; Not to mention I was just rockin&#8217; out to this a couple of days ago. </p>
<p>So it&#8217;s the debut record from the <i>Stooges</i>, the second <i>Stooges</i> album to be featured in our Classic Album Tuesday segment (Thursday in this case) and the third time now for Iggy. Now my liking for the muzak of Iggy Pop doesn&#8217;t  go back that far (like a couple months) but I&#8217;ve always had a great deal of respect for the clown prince of rock. He&#8217;s charismatic with his bad boy sneer and relaxed &#8220;don&#8217;t-give-a-shit&#8221; delivery. They just don&#8217;t make frontmen like that anymore but you can&#8217;t count out the edgy musicianship from his fellow stooges either. Ron Asheton delivers track after track of sludgy riffage and ooften dabbles with some well deserved wah-wah. The rhythm section is classic rock 101 with some crunchy drums from Ron&#8217;s brother Scott and bass duties being filled by Dave Alexander, the first in a line of drug addicted bass players (That&#8217;s rock and roll).</p>
<p>But what really rock my socks off is the fact that thiscame out in 1969. Aside from maybe <i>MC5</i> it&#8217;s hard to think of many other bands from the 60s that truly paved a way for punk (maybe even metal too). Sure there was a handful of pretty raw garage rock bands, but only so many of them were ya know, any good. I&#8217;ve delved fairly deep into the world of late 60s hard rock and these guys are still some of the best if not the best of their raw rock niche. </p>
<p><i>The Stooges</i> just exude coolness without even trying. Sometimes it&#8217;s just the most simple things that have the most compelling effect. Just look at the lyrics to <i>1969</i> it&#8217;s like one sentence, yet every word carries with it so much angst and power. Now that&#8217;s balls-to-the-walls….</p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;1969&#8243;, &#8220;I Wanna Be Your Dog&#8221;, &#8220;No Fun&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=887</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mass Effect Beginner&#8217;s Guide</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=886</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=886#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 09:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the past few weeks I&#8217;ve replayed the first Mass Effect and made it about half way through Mass Effect 2. It has cemented them as among my favorite games. Before I shift my focus to next week&#8217;s Portal 2 I wanted to share the wealth with anyone who has yet to delve into this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe title="YouTube video player" width="440" height="278" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/BnEej1RfqTs?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe><br />Over the past few weeks I&#8217;ve replayed the first <i>Mass Effect </i>and made it about half way through <i>Mass Effect 2</i>. It has cemented them as among my favorite games. Before I shift my focus to next week&#8217;s <i>Portal 2</i> I wanted to share the wealth with anyone who has yet to delve into this fantastic vision of the future.</p>
<p><span style="font-size: large;">What&#8217;s <i>Mass Effect</i> All About?</span><br />In the beginning of the first <i>Mass Effect</i>, humanity is a recent arrival on the the galactic stage. Mankind got there thanks to the discovery of ancient technology from an extinct alien race called the Protheans. The Mass Effect is what makes FTL travel possible. The central hub of galactic civilization is the Citadel, and that is where the most powerful body of inter-species government, The Council, resides. Humanity wants a seat on the council and our chances would be improved if a human could become a Spectre, an agent of the council with incredible autonomy and authority. Commander Shepard is probably mankind&#8217;s best candidate.</p>
<p><span style="font-size: large;">Who is Commander Shepard?</span><br />That&#8217;s largely up to you. Shepard is a human, but that&#8217;s about all that&#8217;s set about the commander. You are free to choose is Shepard is a man or a woman, what kind of upbringing Shepard had, why Shepard is famous and what kind of combat Shepard specializes in. Both <i>Mass Effects </i>are engaging because you are usually free to make your own choice on how to tackle a situation. Your choices are categorized as Paragon or Renegade and if you consistently make choices down one of those paths, you are able to do more. As a Paragon, Shepard is a compassionate hero, always willing to help others and maybe even able to charm his or her way out of some sticky situations. As a Renegade, Shepard is a more intimidating, apathetic and selfish figure, willing to shoot enemies who spend to much time monologue-ing and even betray people for his or her own benefit.</p>
<p>For what it&#8217;s worth, choosing to have a background as a spacer war hero will boost your Paragon points at the beginning of the game and choosing to be a ruthless earth-born will boost your Renegade points. To start as neutral as possible, choose to be a sole survivor colonist. Personally, I think the female Shepard voice actor is better as a Paragon and the male actor is better as a Renegade. But most importantly, you should just make Shepard the kind of hero you want to play. You&#8217;ll be commanding the commander for quite a while.</p>
<p><span style="font-size: large;">What are the Classes?</span><br />There are six classes in the <i>Mass Effect </i>games. They are broken into three focuses: combat, tech and biotic abilities. The soldier is pure combat, the only class able to master all the weapons in both games. The engineer is pure tech and which is handy for locked doors and crates in the first game and the ability to summon an attack drone in the second. The adept is pure biotic, able to use powers not unlike those of a Jedi. Lots of throwing people around. The other three classes are mixes of the first three. The infiltrator is a combat and tech specialist and an expert sniper in the second game. The vanguard is a combat and biotics specialist, a master of close combat. The sentinel is a tech and biotics specialist, arguably the most versatile of all the classes.</p>
<p>When I first played through <i>Mass Effect</i>, my Shepard was an infiltrator. I liked that, since I never felt obligated to bring another tech specialist just to unlock crates. I turned that Shepard into a soldier in <i>Mass Effect 2</i>, because I wanted access to all the guns. My second time through both games I played as a vanguard and have been really enjoying it. In <i>Mass Effect 2</i>, vanguards get the ability to charge, which I think is the most fun power in the game, although it takes a bit of skill to use properly. I&#8217;ve been told that sentinels and soldiers have the easiest time getting through both games. Once again, you should really just choose what sounds fun to you.</p>
<p><span style="font-size: large;">Why Should I Play These Games?</span><br />If you like third person shooters, RPGs or engaging stories, both <i>Mass Effect </i>games are worth your time. The first game is like great <i>Star Trek</i>, it builds an amazing new universe that you&#8217;ll love to explore and learn about. The second game is like a <i>Star Wars</i>, less focused on the science fiction and more about real drama and an epic story. Except you get to make all the choices.</p>
<p>Both games focus on your ability to assemble a team of misfits to overcome ridiculous odds. They feature a great cast of characters who you will genuinely enjoy getting to know and will make it difficult for you to choose who to bring to a battle, and, eventually, who lives and who dies. I have never enjoyed conversation more in a game than in both of the <i>Mass Effects</i>.</p>
<p>Admittedly, the first <i>Mass Effect </i>has started to show its age, especially if you&#8217;ve seen <i>Mass Effect 2</i>. If you have a PS3, that&#8217;s a non-issue, since the game never came out on that platform. You get a bonus interactive comic at the beginning of <i>Mass Effect 2 </i>that catches you up and lets you make the critical decisions from the first game. If you&#8217;re on Xbox or PC, suck it up, bitch. Get past the technical jank, the bad inventory management, the terrible Mako sections. At the heart of it all, the first <i>Mass Effect </i>is still quite an enjoyable title.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re scared because of the RPG aspects of the games, don&#8217;t be. In <i>Mass Effect 2</i>, there basically is no wrong choice you can make, the leveling and inventory systems are so streamlined. More importantly, the combat is great fun, like <i>Gears of War</i> with magical sci fi powers. This isn&#8217;t turn-based at all, it&#8217;s a straight-up shooter that you could play without ever pausing.</p>
<p><i>Mass Effect 3 </i>is supposed to come out at the end of this year. You&#8217;ve still got time to join me in line on opening night. It&#8217;s time you catch up with one of the greatest game series of all time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=886</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Any Time Will Do</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=885</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=885#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 06:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=885</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TV on the Radio &#8211; Nine Types of Light I usually try wait a little while for someone else to review a new album, or at least until I&#8217;ve listened to it enough that when I hear a track I like I don&#8217;t have to go look up what it&#8217;s called. But you know what? [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">TV on the Radio &#8211; <i>Nine Types of Light</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-SlI2K0be3BI/TalghS25evI/AAAAAAAABBI/RwLIwqJRokA/s1600/NTOL.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-SlI2K0be3BI/TalghS25evI/AAAAAAAABBI/RwLIwqJRokA/s200/NTOL.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<p>I usually try wait a little while for someone else to review a new album, or at least until I&#8217;ve listened to it enough that when I hear a track I like I don&#8217;t have to go look up what it&#8217;s called. But you know what? I really like TV on the Radio and I really like their new album. Since it came out I&#8217;ve listened to it every chance I&#8217;ve gotten, which hasn&#8217;t been often enough, let&#8217;s be honest. But I&#8217;m really enjoying <i>Nine Types of Light</i> and I wanted to talk about it before it was too late and we discover the tenth kind of light (did we already? Are types of light a thing?).</p>
<p>It seems like just yesterday I listened to <i>Dear Science </i>for the first time and wondered where these guys had been my whole life. But that was almost three years ago. Just like Radiohead, now they&#8217;re back and not really bursting into new territory. But, come on, <i>Dear Science </i>would be pretty hard to top, don&#8217;t you think. What <i>Nine Types of Light </i>misses in not being pretty much perfect, it makes up in being TV on the Radio&#8217;s most consistent, accessible album yet.</p>
<p>Sometimes &#8220;accessible&#8221; is a euphemism for boring or safe, but this is not the case with <i>Nine Types of Light</i>. The songs the band included are not about how the world is falling apart, rather, they&#8217;re about more familiar, warmer subjects, like love. And damnit, why not? Can&#8217;t these guys focus on the lighter side of life for a change? I think so.</p>
<p>Things seem a little slower this time around, they lack the desperation of a &#8220;Wolf Like Me&#8221; or &#8220;Dancing Choose,&#8221; instead taking their time to build up into sonic pleasure-centers. At times, <i>Nine Types of Light </i>is soulful, funky and even rocking. Even though this album might be a little less grim and a little more comfortable than you might expect, if you&#8217;re a fan of the band of even bands kind of like TV on the Radio, you&#8217;ll find something to cling on to here.</p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks: </b>&#8220;Second Song,&#8221; &#8220;Will Do,&#8221; &#8220;All Falls Down&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=885</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cry Me a Riviera</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=884</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=884#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 17:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Metronomy &#8211; The English Riviera Much has changed since multi-instrumentalist Joseph Mount released the experimental electronic, mostly instrumental, album Pip Paine (Pay The £5000 You Owe) in 2006 under the moniker of Metronomy. Since then he&#8217;s released the incredibly infectious Nights Out and even added some new members to this former solo act. Metronomy has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Metronomy &#8211; <i>The English Riviera</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-F1Oz4l43eNI/TakOcV32zSI/AAAAAAAAB-U/EPBCIMRdqfM/s1600/METRONOMY_THE_ENGLISH_RIVIERA_ALBUMCOVER.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 200px; height: 200px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-F1Oz4l43eNI/TakOcV32zSI/AAAAAAAAB-U/EPBCIMRdqfM/s200/METRONOMY_THE_ENGLISH_RIVIERA_ALBUMCOVER.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5596019892055100706" /></a><br />Much has changed since multi-instrumentalist Joseph Mount released the experimental electronic, mostly instrumental, album <i>Pip Paine (Pay The £5000 You Owe)</i> in 2006 under the moniker of <i>Metronomy</i>. Since then he&#8217;s released the incredibly infectious <i>Nights Out</i> and even added some new members to this former solo act. <i>Metronomy</i> has evolved into one talented Brit fiddling around into a full fledged four piece band. While the style is still essentially electronic it&#8217;s also taken a bit of an 80s New Wave sound, just look at that <i>Miami Vice</i> pastel cover. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s always refreshing to see actual melodic compositions created with electronic music rather than just some guy dicking around for like ten minutes, that&#8217;s why <i>Nights Out</i> worked so well it was dancey and catchy. Though <i>The English Riviera</i> is still ruled by old school synths <i>Metronomy</i> sounds (I hate to say) a little more mainstream. I&#8217;m not sure if it&#8217;s the addition of more common rock peripherals or the more relaxed compositions, but these songs are definitely lacking some of the punch of previous <i>Metronomy</i> compositions. Though if you were to look at <i>The English Riviera</i> without comparing it to previous <i>Metronomy</i> recordings I think you&#8217;d find it&#8217;s still very pleasing to the ears. </p>
<p>Sure <i>The English Riviera</i> is a little soft, maybe a little slow for the less patient, but there&#8217;s some great, lush sounds being produced by maestro Joseph Mount. At the same it&#8217;s a bit conflicting to judge <i>The English Riviera</i> as whole because it just happens to be one of those albums where the first five songs are probably the best and the rest is just fine. So for that it wavers between the common DaMorgue rating of three to three and a half stars. One thing I can definitely say is it grows on you so I&#8217;m gonna rate it on the higher end of the spectrum, not bad <i>Metronomy</i>, not bad. </p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;Everything Goes My Way&#8221;, &#8220;The Look&#8221;, &#8220;She Wants&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=884</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>172</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>C.A.T.: Astral Weeks</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=883</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=883#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 06:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=883</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Van Morrison &#8211; Astral Weeks (1968) Well it&#8217;s taken about three years, but we&#8217;ve finally reached 100 CAT&#8217;s, and we&#8217;ve still yet to post one that actually seemed worth writing. &#160;For this 100th CAT I&#8217;ve picked somewhat of a doozy, as Van Morrison&#8217;s Astral Weeks is one of those great albums that really defies any [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Van Morrison &#8211; <i>Astral Weeks </i>(1968)</span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-pdKJ8kQQVFs/TaU_evx65lI/AAAAAAAAA_I/EzyNI0eIbW0/s1600/van-morrison-astral-weeks.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-pdKJ8kQQVFs/TaU_evx65lI/AAAAAAAAA_I/EzyNI0eIbW0/s200/van-morrison-astral-weeks.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<p>Well it&#8217;s taken about three years, but we&#8217;ve finally reached 100 CAT&#8217;s, and we&#8217;ve still yet to post one that actually seemed worth writing. &nbsp;For this 100th CAT I&#8217;ve picked somewhat of a doozy, as Van Morrison&#8217;s <i>Astral Weeks</i> is one of those great albums that really defies any sort of categorization, so I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;ll fail to even crack the surface of what makes this a great album.</p>
<p>Coming off of the success of the single &#8220;Brown Eyed Girl&#8221;, <i>Astral Weeks</i> saw Morrison in the wake of a dispute with Bang Records, who had released a bunch of Morrison&#8217;s older songs as 1967&#8242;s <i>Blowin&#8217; Your Mind</i> unbeknownst to Morrison. &nbsp;Displeased with the result of that album, Morrison decided to release <i>Astral Weeks</i> on Warner Bros. Records. &nbsp;Unsurprisingly the album was met with little fanfare or success, and it&#8217;s kind of easy to see why, as there really isn&#8217;t anything resembling hit single material on <i>Astral Weeks</i>.</p>
<p>But the beauty of <i>Astral Weeks</i> lies in the swirling musical textures of the album, while Morrison&#8217;s nostalgic lyrics are often evocative and abstract at the same time. &nbsp;There really aren&#8217;t any verses or choruses on any of the songs, they kind of just slowly unfold over long stretches, leaving the listener with plenty of different sounds to swim around in. &nbsp;Much of the album revolves around Morrison&#8217;s acoustic guitar, but this isn&#8217;t your typical &#8217;60s singer-songwriter album, as Morrison is often accompanied by harpsichord, flute, and most prominently Richard Davis&#8217;s jazzy double bass.</p>
<p><i>Astral Weeks</i> has often been described as a song cycle, and it definitely has that impressionistic quality that gives it a sound that isn&#8217;t really like anything else in the realm of folk, jazz, rock, or any other genre that the album skewers. &nbsp;I&#8217;m certain that the <i>Astral Weeks</i>&#8216; odd sound and structure is what caused me to be a little perplexed by it&#8217;s reputation when I first heard it a few years ago, but it seems each time I return to it, I find myself being even more drawn into its strange beauty.</p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;Astral Weeks&#8221;, &#8220;Sweet Thing&#8221;, &#8220;Madame George&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=883</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Angles in the Outfield</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=882</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=882#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 22:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=882</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Strokes &#8211; Angles If we let any more time slip by I might just forget about this entirely. So remember how The Strokes hadn&#8217;t released an album since 2006 and everybody was like &#8220;What&#8217;s the hold up?&#8221; I even remember hearing rumors that guitarist Albert Hammond Jr being in rehab among other things. Regardless [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">The Strokes &#8211; <i>Angles</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-Uy-6lFggzz4/TaTVEYiLedI/AAAAAAAAB-M/4RIXl3ZVGOk/s1600/Strokes_1.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 200px; height: 200px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-Uy-6lFggzz4/TaTVEYiLedI/AAAAAAAAB-M/4RIXl3ZVGOk/s200/Strokes_1.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5594830908383001042" /></a><br />If we let any more time slip by I might just forget about this entirely. So remember how <i>The Strokes</i> hadn&#8217;t released an album since 2006 and everybody was like &#8220;What&#8217;s the hold up?&#8221; I even remember hearing rumors that guitarist Albert Hammond Jr being in rehab among other things. Regardless of what the hold up was we finally have a new album here in 2011, it&#8217;s called <i>Angles</i> and it&#8217;s pretty damn good.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s safe to say there was a great deal of hype around this album. &#8220;Could <i>The Strokes</i> really recapture the brilliance of <i>Is This It?</i> once more?&#8221; The band was claiming it was their best album since the previously mentioned classic and I think they might be right. While I&#8217;m mildly disappointed that <i>The Strokes</i> didn&#8217;t really decide to go back to the catchy simplicity of <i>Is This It?</i>, I think they made up for it with some of their best musicianship yet. The arrangements are unique, unpredictable and the production is sleek as usual. </p>
<p>Whereas I was anticipating something more of the lines of earlier <i>Strokes&#8217;</i> numbers, <i>Angles</i> probably bares more of a similarity to Julian Casablancas 2009 solo release <i>Phrazes for the Young</i>. Most notably in the controversial among <i>Strokes</i> fans track &#8220;You&#8217;re So Right&#8221; which has been compared to Julian&#8217;s solo track &#8220;River of Brakelights&#8221; but whatever, I like both. Personally I enjoyed Julian&#8217;s solo album so I welcome any similarities, it&#8217;s just his style. </p>
<p>I remember being a little worried after <i>First Impressions of Earth</i> that <i>The Strokes</i> were losing their creative spark. Sure there&#8217;s some nice cuts on <i>First Impressions</i> but the melodies were definitely lacking and the arrangements just fine, not great, just fine. Luckily <i>Angles</i> brings back the creative edge in full force with some of the most unique <i>Strokes&#8217;</i> tracks to date. Some of the best examples include the lead single &#8220;Under Cover of Darkness&#8221; which despite it&#8217;s always changing nature somehow remains catchy. Though &#8220;Taken For a Fool&#8221; that&#8217;s a truly great track, what a chorus, what energy, and what a spectacular showcase of this band&#8217;s ability to play off of each other so marvelously.</p>
<p>Though this album may not be the second coming of Christ, it&#8217;s still a great piece of music. Sure I feel a little disappointed that <i>The Strokes</i> may never return to the sound of <i>Is This It?</i> but then I think &#8220;Well why would they need to?&#8221; A good band should learn to evolve and adapt their sound overtime and that&#8217;s just what <i>The Strokes</i> have done. </p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;Taken For a Fool&#8221;, &#8220;Under Cover of Darkness&#8221;, &#8220;You&#8217;re So Right&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=882</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Real America</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=881</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=881#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 23:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Red State Red State is the latest from the mind of Kevin Smith, yet it&#8217;s neither associated with Smith&#8217;s View Askewniverse or even the comedy genre for that matter, rather it&#8217;s an experimental film… A mad experiment! Though why would Smith feel the need to separate himself from the genre that&#8217;s made him so beloved [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"> <i>Red State</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-00-SOnPdo18/TaIBrr5PPkI/AAAAAAAAB-E/uMyPBpR5HDE/s1600/Red_State_Poster.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 211px; height: 320px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-00-SOnPdo18/TaIBrr5PPkI/AAAAAAAAB-E/uMyPBpR5HDE/s320/Red_State_Poster.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5594035537176378946" /></a><br /><i>Red State</i> is the latest from the mind of Kevin Smith, yet it&#8217;s neither associated with Smith&#8217;s View Askewniverse or even the comedy genre for that matter, rather it&#8217;s an experimental film… A mad experiment! Though why would Smith feel the need to separate himself from the genre that&#8217;s made him so beloved by many? Well as Smith explains it, <i>Red State</i> is his edgy/artsy film school flick.  It&#8217;s his opportunity to let loose and mess with the editing and visuals, obscure the plot, and all that bold stuff. Sure <i>Red State</i> still has some laughs but for the most part it&#8217;s meant to unnerve viewers and judging from the audience&#8217;s reactions I think it did.</p>
<p>The premise revolves around three horny teachers looking for love in all the wrong places. After receiving an online invitation for sex by an older woman, the three head down to a shady neck of the woods for some hanky panky, but naturally they get much more then they bargained for. So the three end up being the hostages of the notorious Cooper family, a hate group of extreme Christian fundamentalists led by the maniacal Abin Cooper (Michael Parks). Though word spreads quickly about the fiasco and soon enough the Cooper&#8217;s are surrounded by the boys in blue led by Special Agent Joseph Keenan (John Goodman). What follows is 80 something minutes of apocalyptic rants and messy shootouts that results in some very unsettling yet satisfying entertainment. </p>
<p><i>Red State</i> is unconventional in almost every way a film can be. The editing (by Smith himself) is purposefully choppy, the story structure shifts around and the pacing ranges from lightning quick to slow like molasses. If Smith&#8217;s intention was to bombard his viewers with a series of visceral images (and I&#8217;m pretty sure it was) he has for the most part succeeded, though it does occasionally lack consistency. Take the beginning for example it&#8217;s quick n&#8217; punchy and gets you excited from the get go, but then about 15 minutes in it comes to a complete stop as we hear the first proclamation from the devious  Abin Cooper. Now sure Michael Parks is great in this role, but this scene just keeps going and going. It&#8217;s from here on that the film is always switching around, like it never establishes a steady flow because Smith wants us to feel unnerved, but there&#8217;s a difference between being unnerved and being unattached. It&#8217;s hard to get sucked into a movie when it&#8217;s always shifting around.</p>
<p>Now I actually went into this movie with low expectations. The reviews had been pretty harsh and definitely worried me. What if I didn&#8217;t like it? I mean I was meeting Kevin Smith after the showing what if he asked me what I though of it? Thankfully it wasn&#8217;t half bad, I mean it wasn&#8217;t perfect (you heard me list off some if it&#8217;s shortcomings) but it was entertaining and off-the-wall and beautifully photographed with the RedOne camera. As Smith brought up after the showing, it&#8217;s not supposed to mean anything or send some kind of message, it was just an excuse to mess around with visuals and try to entertain and entertained I was. I&#8217;m just thankful I live in a blue state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=881</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Evening with Silent Bob</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=880</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=880#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 23:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=880</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s my lengthy retelling of the night I met Kevin Smith. It&#8217;s probably full of grammar and spelling errors as I didn&#8217;t have the energy to proof read all this. I don&#8217;t expect anyone to read the whole thing so I hope you enjoy skimming it, snoogans! It&#8217;s still a little difficult to process everything [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-IlPbIiG8N3Q/TZ-YUsDuJgI/AAAAAAAAB9s/eMxzWNI7uO0/s1600/Snoogins.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 266px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-IlPbIiG8N3Q/TZ-YUsDuJgI/AAAAAAAAB9s/eMxzWNI7uO0/s400/Snoogins.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5593356743409018370" /></a><br />Here&#8217;s my lengthy retelling of the night I met Kevin Smith. It&#8217;s probably full of grammar and spelling errors as I didn&#8217;t have the energy to proof read all this. I don&#8217;t expect anyone to read the whole thing so I hope you enjoy skimming it, snoogans!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s still a little difficult to process everything that went down last monday. Not only did I get to see the latest Kevin Smith film about six months ahead of it&#8217;s release date, but I got to meet the funny man himself, how did I get into this situation? Well it starts a little something like this; my cousin Kyle is the Sr. Manager of Artist Relations at Avid, ya know that company that makes editing software and other neat stuff? So since Kevin Smith&#8217;s latest flick <i>Red State</i> worked with Avid, Kyle went on tour with the film as a representative. Then about a month ago I get an email and Kyle tells me the tours coming to Seattle&#8217;s McCaw Hall. Being that my brother and I are both filmmakers in our own way, he not only invites us to the show but also with the proposition that he can get us in on a private Q&#038;A with Silent Bob himself, how private? Six people and that&#8217;s including my brother and I. </p>
<p>So monday afternoon I head out to Seattle and through a series of taxis, buses, and  a pickup form my cousin arrive at the prestigious McCaw Hall. There I get my ticket and fancy shmancy backstage pass, a first in my life. I meet the other film students around the same time with two of them hailing from my former Bellevue College and two from Vancouver Film School, the school that Kevin Smith himself dropped out of after only a few months. Though I&#8217;m curious as to how this group was assembled, I mean I know why I&#8217;m there (I&#8217;ve got connections) but what about these film hopefuls? Raffles… Wow the fact that these students are here due to nothing more than chance? Makes me feel kind of guilty, especially since Kyle is the one guiding and instructing all the students regarding the night ahead. Paul arrives about a half hour later after accidentally being taken to Renton by a South African cab driver. What&#8217;s the deal with taxis all of a sudden? I wouldn&#8217;t recommend them, too pricy, unless it&#8217;s the Cash Cab.</p>
<p>The show is delayed by an hour, so Paul and I see this as the perfect opportunity to do what else… Go to Dicks. Kyle comes around and we all chat about this and that, while also trying to convince Kyle of the greatness of Dicks Drive-In (He lives in Phoenix, Arizona these days). We head back to McCaw a little before 8pm where the 100 year old usher guides us to our seats. Seems strange that everyone that worked at McCaw was at least over 75, I guess it&#8217;s getting harder and harder to retire in this economy. Our seats are far back but the view is still fairly good, not long after the lights dim and Kevin Smith takes the stage.</p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-lWsT3a-pbLs/TZ-YocM2yAI/AAAAAAAAB98/hU56arEtl84/s1600/new-stills-for-kevin-smiths-red-state.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 266px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-lWsT3a-pbLs/TZ-YocM2yAI/AAAAAAAAB98/hU56arEtl84/s400/new-stills-for-kevin-smiths-red-state.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5593357082749749250" /></a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m was well aware of Kevin Smith&#8217;s reputation as a big talker, so I was prepared for a long night. He introduced the film with a simple enough breakdown, that <i>Red State</i> was loosely based off the Fred Phelps family (a real life group of religious nut-jobs) and that it wasn&#8217;t a comedy like <i>Clerks</i> but a horror movie like <i>Jersey Girl</i>. I think it&#8217;s great that he has such a great sense of humor about both his failure successes and after a few more dick jokes he presented to us <i>Red State!</i></p>
<p>Rather than going into detail on the specifics I&#8217;ve <i>Red State</i> (I&#8217;ll do that in an upcoming review) let me skip ahead a little. So were watching the movie, which is surprisingly entertaining (despite what some of the critics have written) when my cousin taps me on the shoulder. As he points behind me I turn to see who else but Kevin Smith on his laptop sitting behind me. I guess he likes to tweet during screenings of his movies, but it just blew my mind that he could submerge himself into the audience like that, awesome?</p>
<p>So about 85 or 88 minutes later (it was a short movie) Kevin Smith took the stage once again. Naturally I knew what was coming, the crowd Q&#038;A which I&#8217;ve heard can last anywhere from a few minutes to hours, this one had to be at least over an hour. I suppose I&#8217;d enjoy this more if I&#8217;d just been a regular attendee, but remember I get to him later, so honestly that&#8217;s all I could think about in my impatience. The questions were typical of Smith&#8217;s fans; obscure references, questions about Kevin&#8217;s podcasts, and of course the couple of d-bags that see this as an opportunity to network. This included a girl with a comic script and a guy who was like &#8220;Dude, I have an Epic camera I could help you on your next movie.&#8221; The audience were all sighs and shrugs at these moments and I was no different. </p>
<p>After what seemed like an eternity of bizarre yet humorous gabbing the show cleared out, though in a way my night had just begun. All the students gathered as we waited for the go ahead from some guy, I think he was like Kevin&#8217;s road manager or something? We all talked about the movie as we waited and most of us liked it. I was surprised cause I went in ready to hate it and no my mind wasn&#8217;t changed because of the circumstances. I mean sure it was a little disjointed but it had some great laughs and scares. Finally we get the green light and head to a small room behind the McCaw Hall stage. </p>
<p>The group (only chaperoned my cousin and the guy that works for Kevin) takes us into a room where all the students gather around a table and not long after Kevin arrives and takes a seat across from myself…. and what&#8217;s the first thing he says? Well he looks at my X-Files shirt and says &#8220;Oh man that&#8217;s an awesome shirt.&#8221; Awesome, I mean I knew Kevin Smith was an X-fan, I am too but the fact that he actually mentioned it? That made my day. So we talk about the episode for a few minutes and then launch into the Q&#038;A. Here&#8217;s a little brief summarization of the questions.</p>
<p><b>- How do you feel about critics sites like Rotten Tomatoes?</b><br />: Naturally Kevin hates stuff like that, even though he has a lot of critic friends. He went on to talk about art films saying &#8220;If you&#8217;ve made an art film and it gets a 75% you&#8217;ve fucked up.&#8221; I don&#8217;t know about that, but it was a lot of fun to listen to.</p>
<p><b>- Can you remember anything negative or positive anyones said about your filmmaking that has stuck with you? </b><br />Wow a lot talk about his critics thus far, though it was a lot of fun to hear him talk about the people that have hated his work, he&#8217;s got a great attitude regarding that subject.</p>
<p><b>- What&#8217;s your stance on film school? Are we just wasting or money when we should be spending it on our own films?</b><br />: That question was mine and I was glad to hear that Kevin doesn&#8217;t consider higher education to be a waste of time, even though he&#8217;s a film school dropout.  Basically he talked about how lucky he was and that since that probably wont happen to everyone we should hone our craft and get educated for as long as he can. He feels that it&#8217;s a great time to learn things and meet people and there shouldn&#8217;t be any rush to make a film as soon as you can. He went on to talk about Dennys and herpes but for the most part the answer I liked to hear. </p>
<p><b>Next this girl was like &#8220;I noticed in the credits that you didn&#8217;t have any women on your camera crew?&#8221;</b><br />: Wow that seemed kind of rude, as Nancy might say &#8220;Get this bitch out of here.&#8221; Kevin wasn&#8217;t sure as he doesn&#8217;t do any the hiring on his films so it was then that his manager/friend/guy/associate spoke up and said &#8220;Yeah we did Mary, she did focus.&#8221; So c&#8217;mon, you have this one opportunity to meet Kevin smith and you start calling him out? What&#8217;s up with that? </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure there was a few other cliched mini-questions but for the most part it was a blast.  Personally I feel I hit it off well, some people are so serious I was just trying to make him laugh, think I did alright. Afterwards he signed autographs and took pictures. I got him to sign a copy of his book &#8220;Silent Bob Speaks&#8221; to which he lovingly signed &#8220;Hey John, I fucking love you.&#8221; Classic… And the rest is in the books, thanks for reading if you managed to read the whole thing.</p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-N2Xosxe7XXY/TZ-Ybi6PwBI/AAAAAAAAB90/jH2ywOkC2vM/s1600/210050_1762587423774_1211750938_32009481_2165438_o.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 266px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-N2Xosxe7XXY/TZ-Ybi6PwBI/AAAAAAAAB90/jH2ywOkC2vM/s400/210050_1762587423774_1211750938_32009481_2165438_o.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5593356861212442642" /></a><br />&#8220;There&#8217;s something a little off about this picture of Kevin and Paul.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=880</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>C.A.T: The Velvet Underground and Nico</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=879</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=879#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 23:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Velvet Underground &#8211; The Velvet Underground &#038; Nico (1967) How perfect that today&#8217;s (or whenever this gets posted) classic album tuesday honors the year 1967, as I&#8217;ve recently rediscovered my love for The Velvet Underground. I&#8217;m not sure how it happened exactly, but I&#8217;m glad it did as my last two weeks have been [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">The Velvet Underground &#8211; <i>The Velvet Underground &#038; Nico (1967)</i></span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-5NxFLLzaTW8/TZz5DIrAoHI/AAAAAAAAB9c/kZO6FQ1YOHA/s1600/Velvet_Underground_and_Nico.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 200px; height: 200px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-5NxFLLzaTW8/TZz5DIrAoHI/AAAAAAAAB9c/kZO6FQ1YOHA/s200/Velvet_Underground_and_Nico.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5592618669550116978" /></a>How perfect that today&#8217;s (or whenever this gets posted) classic album tuesday honors the year 1967, as I&#8217;ve recently rediscovered my love for <i>The Velvet Underground</i>. I&#8217;m not sure how it happened exactly, but I&#8217;m glad it did as my last two weeks have been dominated by this infamously cool classic. As a pinnacle in both beat and psychedelic music, this is an album that takes on many forms, from the velvety softness of &#8220;Sunday Morning&#8221; to the raw grit of tracks like &#8220;Heroin&#8221;. It invokes both pain and optimism that&#8217;s tied together by the powerful, yet honest songwriting of Lou Reed as he pens songs about drugs, streetwalkers, and some of the notorious superstars of Andy Warhol&#8217;s infamous clique of models, actors, and drag queens. </p>
<p>Pop art king Andy Warhol clearly made his mark on this debut serving as the group&#8217;s early mentor, manager, producer, and cover artist. The addition of German model/artist Nico was another one of Warhol&#8217;s must haves, though it&#8217;s been said this pissed the band off. So with all the experimental absurdity that surrounded this album, it&#8217;s amazing that it&#8217;s as good as it was or still is, it really is brilliant. So much so that it&#8217;s difficult to express with words, it merely inhabits it&#8217;s own category of art rock ecstasy. How something can be this unusual and yet this cohesive is a testament to the songs, musicianship, and the many bold chances that were taken. </p>
<p>Every member of <i>VU</i> adds a distinct layer to this indescribable sound. John Cale brings a great deal of instrumental diversity tackling; bass, piano, celesta, and that classic droning violin that can be heard on tracks like &#8220;The Black Angel&#8217;s Death Song&#8221;. Sterling Morrison also dons the role of bass player, but more importantly provides the much needed low twang of his guitar. Maureen Tucker provides the backbone with one of the most unusual drum setups I&#8217;ve ever heard of including just; tom toms, a snare, and and upturned bass drum, all played with mallets and very sparingly using cymbals. Nico, who clearly isn&#8217;t the best singer somehow manages to fit into the equation with her husky accented voice and Lou Reed pulls the strings (I&#8217;ve been saying that a lot lately) as any great rockband leader does. </p>
<p>I love all the songs for various reasons but I also love it&#8217;s &#8220;we do what we want and don&#8217;t give a shit attitude.&#8221; By which I mean the group&#8217;s approach to both playing and recording. For example take the legendary track &#8220;Heroin&#8221;, it&#8217;s just two goddamn chords! There&#8217;s no bass and the drums even accidentally drop out at the 5:17 mark. Sure they could of recorded it again, maybe polished it up, but it ruined the raw spontaneity of the song. &#8220;European Son&#8221; just descends into madness but somehow it just feels right. I mean there&#8217;s a little bit for everyone with more accessible tracks like &#8220;I&#8217;m Waiting for the Man&#8221; or &#8220;There She Goes Again&#8221; but then you have that great weird shit like &#8220;Venus in Furs&#8221; or other tracks previously mentioned. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s still an exciting listen every time I put it on and I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if it continued to inspire future generations of aspiring rockers. I just wish I knew a better way to describe why I liked it, I guess it&#8217;s one of those cases where you just listen and you know. </p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;Femme Fatale&#8221;, &#8220;Heroin&#8221;, &#8220;Sunday Morning&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=879</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Source is a Source of Course</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=878</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=878#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2011 07:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Source Code What would you do if you had less than a minute to live? That&#8217;s part of the dilemma that Capt. Colter Stevens (Jake Gyllenhaal) must face time and time again within the confines of the source code. The second directorial effort from Duncan Jones (Moon), Source Code is a razor sharp sci-fi thriller [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"> <i>Source Code</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-pa71c3MBnck/TZi7bjW28nI/AAAAAAAAB9M/bos2FPCdQko/s1600/Source_Code_Poster.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 216px; height: 320px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-pa71c3MBnck/TZi7bjW28nI/AAAAAAAAB9M/bos2FPCdQko/s320/Source_Code_Poster.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5591425019402449522" /></a><br />What would you do if you had less than a minute to live? That&#8217;s part of the dilemma that Capt. Colter Stevens (Jake Gyllenhaal) must face time and time again within the confines of the source code. The second directorial effort from Duncan Jones (<i>Moon</i>), <i>Source Code</i> is a razor sharp sci-fi thriller that boggles the nerves and mind all the way to to a real melon scratcher of a finale. Whereas many rising filmmakers hit that sophomore slump, Duncan Jones has crafted an even more mentally stimulating journey of the mind than his first film and I&#8217;m more than pleased to take that ride.</p>
<p>What is the <i>Source Code</i> exactly? In this film the source code represents an opposite reality, in this case a former real life train disaster that was caused by an unknown bomber. Thus in order to understand the events that took place and hopefully discover the identity of the bomber, Capt. Coulter Stevens must enter the source code through the body and mind of one of it&#8217;s dead passengers Sean Fentress à la <i>Quantum Leap</i>. So with only 8 minutes (that being the supposed amount of time the brain is still semi-functional after someone dies) Capt. Stevens must try and try again to solve this mystery and hopefully prevent a claimed future bombing. </p>
<p>Naturally with a premise like this and a filmmaker like Duncan Jones you can imagine that there&#8217;s many more twists and turns buried within <i>Source Code</i>. Operating like a Hitchcockian <i>Groundhog Day</i>, <i>Source Code</i> unravels in an unconventional yet fully engrossing fashion that never gives you any reason to turn away. Just imagine when in a movie a character has only so many minutes before a bomb goes off, now imagine that over and again, that&#8217;s a lot of suspense but still done in a clever way.</p>
<p>I almost forgot to mention it&#8217;s a love story too, as Capt. Stevens continually connects with another passenger Christina (Michelle Monaghan) but fortunately it flows naturally within the premise and in no way feels tacked on. Other characters include Vera Farmiga as Goodwin, a military woman guiding Capt. Stevens through his trials and Jeffery Wright as the creator of the source code Dr. Rutledge. Though you can&#8217;t forget all the train passengers, all colorful and mysterious in their own ways and all potential suspects. </p>
<p>As much as I&#8217;d love to talk about how this all wraps up I&#8217;d hate to spoil the end. Really it&#8217;s one of those films that&#8217;s more about the ride than what it all comes to mean, I mean that&#8217;s cool too but it&#8217;s not the main reason I enjoyed it. For the most part I think audiences will enjoy <i>Source Code</i> in that it&#8217;s a great thriller that also leaves you with a lot to think about. Fortunately it&#8217;s nothing endlessly confusing either, which is a big plus considering it heavily deals with time and realities and what not. Hey, with directors like Duncan Jones who knows how many more years of great sci-fi we could expect. Why this could definitely be a sign of good things to come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=878</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>84</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pro Homo</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=877</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=877#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2011 08:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dragon Age II The discussion surrounding Dragon Age II has taken a bizarre turn of late. The game features four potential romantic partners, two women and two men. All of them will express varying degrees of interest in your character, regardless of your gender, and you can take those feelings &#8220;all the way,&#8221; if you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><i>Dragon Age II</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-FGSJffxPKy8/TZK-_PPVXHI/AAAAAAAAA_s/5BSs3vXJ-Q8/s1600/Image_dragon_age_2.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-FGSJffxPKy8/TZK-_PPVXHI/AAAAAAAAA_s/5BSs3vXJ-Q8/s320/Image_dragon_age_2.jpg" width="240" /></a></div>
<p>The discussion surrounding <i>Dragon Age II </i>has taken a bizarre turn of late. The game features four potential romantic partners, two women and two men. All of them will express varying degrees of interest in your character, regardless of your gender, and you can take those feelings &#8220;all the way,&#8221; if you know what I mean. Some people are upset about playing as male characters and having other male characters hit on them and wish the game had a &#8220;no homo&#8221; feature. That is literally one of the saddest and dumbest complaints I&#8217;ve ever heard leveled against a game. God forbid gay characters acting gay. For the record I played a female warrior who got with the lovable female elf mage. It was hot. Well, as hot as my PC graphics card could render.</p>
<p>2009&#8242;s <i>Dragon Age</i> inspired me to upgrade and get somewhat serious about computer gaming again. Well, the insane Steam sales of that Christmas season helped to, but it was mainly <i>Dragon Age</i>. And that was a worthwhile investment. Bioware&#8217;s knack for character development combined brilliantly with the deep tactics only a PC could truly deliver. <i>Dragon Age </i>was one of the most sprawling adventures I&#8217;ve ever played, and I gave it a lot of my time.</p>
<p>So I was surprised to hear that the second <i>Dragon Age </i>game would be out early this year, shortly after Bioware stopped delivering DLC for the original game. It felt like the first game was in development forever, how could the followup rise to the bar that was set before it in so little time? Bioware&#8217;s answer, as it turns out, was to make a smaller epic.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not necessarily a bad idea, but it didn&#8217;t quite work out. You play as Hawke, a human who flees to the Free Marches during the Blight you battled in the first game. Gone are the various origin stories from the first game, Hawke is who s/he is, and you&#8217;ve got to deal with it. You end up in the city of Kirkwall, and you will spend almost the entire game there. You&#8217;ll make friends, enemies and rise through society over the years. The main conflicts are more personal this time, instead of a war with villainous monsters, you deal with the political struggles between the humans and the qunari and between the templars and the mages. Sadly, it ends just as things are getting really interesting, a rushed finish that clearly sets up a <i>Dragon Age III</i>.</p>
<p>The gameplay of <i>Dragon Age II</i> has been greatly streamlined. The supporting cast no longer wears armor, leaving only equipment slots for weapons and trinkets. Combat is more fun than ever, with warriors and rogues upgraded to almost match the dominance of mages from the first game. A new mechanic, cross class combos, adds a new layer of strategy to fighting. However, enemies often spawn out of nowhere after you defeat a group, throwing a wrench into your long-term strategic plans. This is probably a huge problem on the highest difficulty, but on the one I was playing on, I was having so much fun I didn&#8217;t really mind this admittedly gamey aspect of the combat.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s clear that Bioware both rushed <i>Dragon Age II </i>out the door and tried to bring the innovation that made <i>Mass Effect 2 </i>so good to this game. The result is fun and kept me engaged for more hours than I&#8217;d like to admit. But the adventure is a lot smaller, building up to an exciting climax we never see. With a sequel to such a sprawling adventure, that&#8217;s just not acceptable. <i>Dragon Age II </i>is a worthy sequel, but not nearly as worthy as it should have been.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=877</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gimme Some Lovin&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=876</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=876#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peter Bjorn and John &#8211; Gimme Some I have to get this post in before April Fool&#8217;s Day or it will just seem like a joke. Anyways, last tuesday saw the release of Swedish trio Peter Bjorn and John&#8217;s sixth album Gimme Some. Known most recently for their indie experimentation on album&#8217;s like Writer&#8217;s Block [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Peter Bjorn and John &#8211; <i>Gimme Some</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-gdJuJ2tEZEI/TZVHOgENHTI/AAAAAAAAB88/tfT6QOeh4lg/s1600/Peter-Bjorn-and-John-Gimme-Some.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 200px; height: 200px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-gdJuJ2tEZEI/TZVHOgENHTI/AAAAAAAAB88/tfT6QOeh4lg/s200/Peter-Bjorn-and-John-Gimme-Some.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5590452826901650738" /></a>I have to get this post in before April Fool&#8217;s Day or it will just seem like a joke. Anyways, last tuesday saw the release of Swedish trio <i>Peter Bjorn and John&#8217;s</i> sixth album <i>Gimme Some</i>. Known most recently for their indie experimentation on album&#8217;s like <i>Writer&#8217;s Block</i> and <i>Living Thing</i> (very controversial among the DaMorgue staff) <i>PBJ</i> have gone back to the one-two punch sound of their first two albums. Three guys, three instruments, and less than 40 minutes, this is rock at it&#8217;s most primal. </p>
<p>My theory on this return to form has to do with the band&#8217;s live set. <i>PB&#038;J</i> tend to perform as a three piece, yet there album&#8217;s have been getting more and more complicated (I have no idea who they managed to play some of the tunes of their last album) so it makes sense that they&#8217;d return to a sound that they&#8217;d actually be able to replicate. </p>
<p>The result is fresh approach to familiar rock stylings that entertains while not deviating too far from the oddball nature of this trio. The songs are simple yet still stand among some of <i>PB&#038;J&#8217;s</i> best recordings to date. &#8220;Second Chance&#8221; would appear to be the closest the group has had to a &#8220;hit&#8221; song since &#8220;Young Folks&#8221;. I say that because of the amount of air play it&#8217;s received on the radio and on TV. As a matter of fact the first six songs are pop perfection, which is a shame as the last five kind of blur together. I blame this on Bjorn and John as it appears their own so-so compositions made up the last half of the album, though either way it balances out to some easily digestible rockin&#8217; good stuff. </p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;Breaker, Breaker&#8221;, &#8220;Eyes&#8221;, &#8220;Tomorrow Has to Wait&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=876</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>C.A.T.: Parsley, Sage, Rosemary and Thyme</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=875</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=875#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 05:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Simon &#38; Garfunkel &#8211; Parsley, Sage, Rosemary and Thyme (1966) I think Sean wishes the CAT would just go away, so I&#8217;m posting this in direct defiance of the King of Da Morgue, plus I gotta have something to post about. &#160;So anyways, Simon and Garfunkel were more or less the preeminent folk-pop duo of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Simon &amp; Garfunkel &#8211; <i>Parsley, Sage, Rosemary and Thyme </i>(1966)</span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Hpc5l9ctdPQ/TZK6R1tF-FI/AAAAAAAAA-8/vFZqgB79YTY/s1600/parsley-sage-rosemary-and-thyme.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Hpc5l9ctdPQ/TZK6R1tF-FI/AAAAAAAAA-8/vFZqgB79YTY/s200/parsley-sage-rosemary-and-thyme.jpg" width="200" /></a>I think Sean wishes the CAT would just go away, so I&#8217;m posting this in direct defiance of the King of Da Morgue, plus I gotta have something to post about. &nbsp;So anyways, Simon and Garfunkel were more or less the preeminent folk-pop duo of the sixties, and <i>Parsley, Sage, Rosemary and Thyme</i> surely shows them at the height of their powers while giving us a potent snapshot of mid-sixties America.</p>
<p>Coming after the slightly rushed <i>Songs of Silence</i>, this sophomore release saw the duo for the first time&nbsp;really exploring the depths of their sound while Paul Simon conjured up some of his finest tunes. &nbsp;You&#8217;ve got some of Simon and Garfunkel&#8217;s darker and more etherial songs such (&#8220;Patterns&#8221;, &#8220;Scarborough Fair&#8221;), while you&#8217;ve got some of their most cheerfully upbeat songs as well (&#8220;59th Street Bridge Song&#8221;, &#8220;Cloudy&#8221;). &nbsp;Of course all of these great tunes are tied together by Simon and Garfunkel&#8217;s brilliant harmonies, and Art Garfunkel even gets to shine in his solo performance on &#8220;For Emily, Whenever I May Find Her&#8221;. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s hard for me to say whether this or <i>Bridge Over Troubled Water</i> is my favorite S&amp;G album, but I feel like leaning more towards this one partly because it&#8217;s got my personal favorite song of theirs (&#8220;Homeward Bound&#8221;). &nbsp;And apart from the overtly Dylan-y &#8220;A Simple Desultory Phillipic&#8221;, there really isn&#8217;t anything resembling a weak track in the album&#8217;s short but sweet 29 minute running time.</p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;Homeward Bound&#8221;, &#8220;The 59th Street Bridge Song (Feelin&#8217; Groovy)&#8221;, &#8220;A Poem On The Underground Wall&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=875</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Close Encounters of the Turd Kind</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=874</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=874#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 02:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul Laurel and Hardy, Abbott and Costello, Pegg and Frost… At least I always thought they could be that caliber comedy duo. They wooed geek fanboys with cult classics like Shaun of the Dead and Hot Fuzz, but what doesn&#8217;t this have that those did? Edgar Wright. So maybe these real life best buds were [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"> <i>Paul</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/2.5.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-gG1oCNcKwRw/TYmtdTpmqyI/AAAAAAAAB80/pwNpQ4xer6I/s1600/Paul_poster.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 216px; height: 320px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-gG1oCNcKwRw/TYmtdTpmqyI/AAAAAAAAB80/pwNpQ4xer6I/s320/Paul_poster.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5587187531732396834" /></a>Laurel and Hardy, Abbott and Costello, Pegg and Frost… At least I always thought they could be that caliber comedy duo. They wooed geek fanboys with cult classics like <i>Shaun of the Dead</i> and <i>Hot Fuzz</i>, but what doesn&#8217;t this have that those did? Edgar Wright. So maybe these real life best buds were never actually a conventional comedy duo, rather two funny blokes being controlled by a more talented puppet master &#8220;Pull the strings!&#8221; </p>
<p>Penned by Simon Pegg and Nick Frost and directed by Greg Mottola of <i>Superbad</i> fame we have the sci-fi/comedy <i>Paul</i>. <i>Paul</i> being the story of two geeky Englishmen driving around the American southwest in hot pursuit of extra terrestrial hot spots. Naturally they get more then they bargained for when they encounter Paul, the foul mouthed antithesis of E.T. searching for a way home after sixty-something years. Why so long? Because that&#8217;s what&#8217;s in the script.</p>
<p>It sounds like an easy enough premise to sell to fans of both Pegg/Frost and geekdom in general, yet <i>Paul</i> is a film that instantly crash lands and never finds it&#8217;s home. Does it have geeky references to pop culture? Yeah I guess, but there isn&#8217;t anything particular clever about any of it. It&#8217;s easy to reference something, but a lot harder to turn into a joke that&#8217;s relevant to the action of the story. Really I would of preferred to see more obscure references, more subtlety inserted, like ya know, other Pegg/Frost movies. Those films were great because their scripts were immensely layered with hundreds of small yet strikingly witty jokes. Every time I watch <i>Shaun of the Dead</i> I&#8217;m always amazed by how much is really going on through the dialogue and the action. <i>Paul</i> on the other hand is as generic as any other Hollywood shlock, what happened? </p>
<p>With all the comedic talent involved (Seth Rogen, Kristen Wiig, Bill Hader) I&#8217;m not sure exactly what went wrong. I probably laughed just once and I&#8217;ll tell ya, I went to the movies that day wanting to laugh. These jokes about probing and other alien cliches are nothing that we haven&#8217;t already heard in films like <i>Men in Black</i>, couldn&#8217;t they go for a less obvious approach to this concept? I guess not, so what we got was a so-so 100 minutes of predictable slapstick, cheesy homages, and British people… Yay?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=874</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>C.A.T: Introducing the Beau Brummels</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=873</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=873#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 03:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Beau Brummels &#8211; Introducing the Beau Brummels (1965) Not to toot my own horn, but I have a fairly eclectic collection of 60s pop music. I love everything from the stars of the British Invasion to the no name joe schmoes banging away in the garage. Though It&#8217;s rare that I delve any deeper [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">The Beau Brummels &#8211; <i>Introducing the Beau Brummels (1965)</i></span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-eqdJu0rTOKY/TYEzJz8Xt-I/AAAAAAAAB8s/suVh51XLbCs/s1600/182452_1_f.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 200px; height: 200px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-eqdJu0rTOKY/TYEzJz8Xt-I/AAAAAAAAB8s/suVh51XLbCs/s200/182452_1_f.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5584801256571385826" /></a>Not to toot my own horn, but I have a fairly eclectic collection of 60s pop music. I love everything from the stars of the British Invasion to the no name joe schmoes banging away in the garage. Though It&#8217;s rare that I delve any deeper than a few songs from any given obscure group, (some of them were obscure for a reason) I heard good things about this album. It&#8217;s already surprising when you can actually find a Wikipedia entry for an album from a band you&#8217;ve never heard of, let alone a well reviewed album. So today we turn to the debut album from San Francisco five-some <i>The Beau Brummels.</i> </p>
<p>Credited for setting the aesthetic of the San Francisco Sound with their hit song &#8220;Laugh Laugh&#8221;, <i>The Beau Brummels</i> were unique in their combination of beat and folk music and as one of the few bands of the times that wrote more than most of their own material. <i>The Beau Brummels</i> also had great success in the hit single &#8220;Just a Little&#8221; a slick number with a great hook. Look up either of these hits and I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ll recognize them, well if you ever listened to oldies radio that is.</p>
<p>Honestly there isn&#8217;t much separating <i>The Beau Brummels</i> from any other 60s beat group. Aside from the two or three folky-pop numbers the rest of the album is fairly predictable R&#038;B blues style numbers. There&#8217;s plenty of groups that had just much talent as <i>The Beau Brummels</i>, yet the <i>Brummels</i> actually have a successful album to boast about. Hey, I&#8217;m talking about em aren&#8217;t I? That must alone attest to the fact that for whatever reason they&#8217;ve had a little more longevity than some of the other flash in the pan 60s garage bands, good for you <i>Beau Brummels.</i></p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> Just a Little, Laugh Laugh, Not Too Long Ago</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=873</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>110</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Death, Destruction, Blood, Rock</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=872</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=872#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 05:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=872</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does anyone remember Death By Hangers? You know that one death metal band from Satanville, Rhode Island? I hear they&#8217;re working on a new album and they just released this new song that&#8217;s pretty bad. Regardless of whether people want it or not, it&#8217;s being made, just thought I&#8217;d give you the warning. P.S. I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone remember Death By Hangers? You know that one death metal band from Satanville, Rhode Island? I hear they&#8217;re working on a new album and they just released this new song that&#8217;s pretty bad. Regardless of whether people want it or not, it&#8217;s being made, just thought I&#8217;d give you the warning. </p>
<p>P.S. I hear the whole original lineup was murdered by the new lineup. So sorry, no Gregory Ridewood. </p>
<p><a href="http://dl.dropbox.com/u/23354576/01%20Anal%20Horned%20Beasts.mp3">Download</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=872</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://dl.dropbox.com/u/23354576/01%20Anal%20Horned%20Beasts.mp3" length="3248959" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:subtitle>Does anyone remember Death By Hangers? You know that one death metal band from Satanville, Rhode Island? I hear they&#039;re working on a new album and they just released this new song that&#039;s pretty bad. Regardless of whether people want it or not,</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Does anyone remember Death By Hangers? You know that one death metal band from Satanville, Rhode Island? I hear they&#039;re working on a new album and they just released this new song that&#039;s pretty bad. Regardless of whether people want it or not, it&#039;s being made, just thought I&#039;d give you the warning. P.S. I hear the whole original lineup was murdered by the new lineup. So sorry, no Gregory Ridewood. Download</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>Mildly Pleased</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>REMember These Guys?</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=871</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=871#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2011 23:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[R.E.M. &#8211; Collapse Into Now As R.E.M. hobbled through the &#8217;00s, they definitely seemed like a band that probably should have broken up after the departure of original drummer Bill Berry in 1997. &#160;But then in 2008 they came out with Accelerate, an energetic little album that saw the band showing some serious signs of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">R.E.M. &#8211; <i>Collapse Into Now</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-I6NKmHniDDg/TXv8AU-906I/AAAAAAAAA-s/0Y7HumRMrNE/s1600/rem-collapse-into-now.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-I6NKmHniDDg/TXv8AU-906I/AAAAAAAAA-s/0Y7HumRMrNE/s200/rem-collapse-into-now.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<p>As R.E.M. hobbled through the &#8217;00s, they definitely seemed like a band that probably should have broken up after the departure of original drummer Bill Berry in 1997. &nbsp;But then in 2008 they came out with <i>Accelerate</i>, an energetic little album that saw the band showing some serious signs of life while making somewhat of a comeback. &nbsp;Their latest album, <i>Collapse Into Now</i> sees Michael Stipe and co. exploring pretty familiar ground, but the songs are nonetheless just as good on anything on <i>Accelerate, </i>as well as anything they&#8217;ve done in the last decade or so.</p>
<p>Their last album was marked by a ferociously guitar-driven sound, and Collapse Into Now is kind of similar in that the guitars are at the forefront. &nbsp;But we also get a lot of the more subdued ballads that R.E.M. have often done quite well over their illustrious career. &nbsp;You even get to hear Peter Buck conjure up the ghosts of &#8220;Losing My Religion&#8221;, by throwing in some mandolin on &#8220;Uberlin&#8221; and &#8220;It Happened Today&#8221;.</p>
<p>Another component of the album&#8217;s success, which is pretty much the case for any R.E.M. album, is the commanding presence of Michael Stipe. &nbsp;He can still be unbelievably tender on songs like &#8220;Walk It Back&#8221;, while he still has an undeniably irreverent energy on songs like &#8220;Alligator_Aviator_Autopilot_Antimatter&#8221; and &#8220;That Some On Is You&#8221;.</p>
<p>Like most bands their age, R.E.M. aren&#8217;t really in any position to reinvent their sound, but then again they were never really one of those bands anyways, despite their long-lasting vitality. &nbsp;And like most worthwhile albums by a middle-aged rock band,&nbsp;<i>Collapse Into Now</i>&nbsp;reminds us why these guys are who they are, and why they still deserve to be around.</p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;UBerlin&#8221;, &#8220;It Happened Today&#8221;, &#8220;Alligator_Aviator_Autopilot_Antimatter&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=871</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lykke My Love Pump</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=870</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=870#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2011 21:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=870</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lykke Li &#8211; Wounded Rhymes There hasn&#8217;t been a whole lot of music that I&#8217;ve really gotten into so far this year, though I guess I haven&#8217;t really been trying that hard. &#160;I mean I haven&#8217;t even listened to the new Bright Eyes album yet, although I&#8217;m sure I will eventually since I&#8217;m seeing them [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Lykke Li &#8211; <i>Wounded Rhymes</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-5VLr-46xdB4/TXwD6CqKE_I/AAAAAAAAA-w/10E5RKYlp4M/s1600/Lykke_Li_Wounded_Rhymes_cover.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-5VLr-46xdB4/TXwD6CqKE_I/AAAAAAAAA-w/10E5RKYlp4M/s200/Lykke_Li_Wounded_Rhymes_cover.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<p>There hasn&#8217;t been a whole lot of music that I&#8217;ve really gotten into so far this year, though I guess I haven&#8217;t really been trying that hard. &nbsp;I mean I haven&#8217;t even listened to the new Bright Eyes album yet, although I&#8217;m sure I will eventually since I&#8217;m seeing them live for some reason. &nbsp;Anyways, one album I have been enjoying recently is the newest album by Lykke Li, who apparently is Swedish and recorded one album before this, which is about the entire extent of what I know about her.</p>
<p>What I like about this album is that it&#8217;s a little hard to pin down. &nbsp;Li is usually classified as indie pop, but there&#8217;s also a folk element to songs like &#8220;Unrequited Love&#8221;, which sounds almost like a female take on Fleet Foxes. &nbsp;Yet you&#8217;ve also got gorgeous songs like &#8220;Love Out Of Lust&#8221; and &#8220;Sadness Is A Blessing&#8221; which effectively channel that early sixties Phil Spector sound. &nbsp;And then on top of that, you&#8217;ve got this almost tribal-like use of percussion throughout the album.</p>
<p>So it makes for kind of an odd sound, but it&#8217;s that willingness to be weird, but not too weird, that makes Lykke Li stand out from her pop peers. &nbsp;Also she&#8217;s got a great ear for catchy melodies, which goes well with her ability to make songs that are upbeat and danceable, but also intimate and beautiful. &nbsp;I can&#8217;t really say songs like &#8220;I Follow Rivers&#8221; and &#8220;Get Some&#8221; are the kinds of things I&#8217;d usually find myself listening to, as they kind of lean more towards straight-up pop than anything else. &nbsp;But they&#8217;re kind of irresistible, as are most of the songs &nbsp;on <i>Wounded Rhymes</i>, however dissimilar they may seem.</p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;Youth Knows No Pain&#8221;, &#8220;Love Out Of Lust&#8221;, &#8220;Sadness Is A Blessing&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=870</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>100</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>C.A.T.: At The Copa</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=869</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=869#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 01:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sam Cooke &#8211; At The Copa (1964) I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s any denying the fact that Sam Cooke is my favorite vocalist of all time. &#160;He had a voice that seemed to be heaven-sent, and Cooke knew how to use it to reach the highest highs in a way that seemed effortless. &#160;However his reputation [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Sam Cooke &#8211; <i>At The Copa </i>(1964)</span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-chGQLTUf8wI/TXbY20gDedI/AAAAAAAAA-o/mncfI60Wdco/s1600/atthecopa.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="180" src="https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-chGQLTUf8wI/TXbY20gDedI/AAAAAAAAA-o/mncfI60Wdco/s200/atthecopa.jpg" width="200" /></a>I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s any denying the fact that Sam Cooke is my favorite vocalist of all time. &nbsp;He had a voice that seemed to be heaven-sent, and Cooke knew how to use it to reach the highest highs in a way that seemed effortless. &nbsp;However his reputation as an artist lies in his singles, which makes him a bit hard to pay tribute to in CAT form. &nbsp;Fortunately, he released one hell of a swingin&#8217; live album with <i>At The Copa</i>, recorded the same year as his untimely death.</p>
<p>Recorded at New York City&#8217;s famous Copacabana, the performance shows Cooke and his band in true firing form, as there&#8217;s an undeniable energy in the room. &nbsp;It&#8217;s a little odd to hear how much of a jazzy/swing sound there is to Cooke&#8217;s band, but for the most part it works with Cooke&#8217;s signature brand of gospel-infused soul. &nbsp;And also surprisingly, you can really feel that the crowd&#8217;s into it, despite the fact that I&#8217;m sure Cooke was playing to a fairly posh group of people at the Copa.</p>
<p>Considering Sam Cooke was one of soul&#8217;s first great singer/songwriter&#8217;s, it&#8217;s a little strange to see that Cooke&#8217;s set is made almost entirely of old standards and covers of more contemporary artists&#8217; songs. &nbsp;But leave it to Sam Cooke to put his stamp all over these songs, and the way he attacks these songs with such energy really shows what a true talent the man was. &nbsp;I mean this album might have the best versions of &#8220;If I Had A Hammer&#8221; and &#8220;This Little Light of Mine&#8221; I&#8217;ve ever heard, and those are two songs I&#8217;d usually have a hard time getting excited about hearing.</p>
<p>There were a lot of icons of &#8217;60s music that died far too young, but Sam Cooke is probably the one that really gets to me the most. &nbsp;He had just come off of a huge artist breakthrough with the single &#8220;A Change Is Gonna Come&#8221; just months before his death, and I can only imagine what he could&#8217;ve done next.</p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;If I Had A Hammer (The Hammer Song)&#8221;, &#8220;Twistin&#8217; The Night Away&#8221;, &#8220;Tennessee Waltz&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=869</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>104</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Home on the Rango</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=868</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=868#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2011 07:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rango It&#8217;s all the raw, untamed, grit of a western combined with eye popping animation to make possibly one of the strangest films about an anthropomorphic reptile in the old west ever seen. His name is Rango (Johnny Depp) and he&#8217;s a fish out of water into a tall glass of Texas tea. Just so [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"> <i>Rango</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-8KdcD71EIfE/TXWGHpmyarI/AAAAAAAAB8k/V6T_rx_LCeE/s1600/Rango2011Poster.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 216px; height: 320px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-8KdcD71EIfE/TXWGHpmyarI/AAAAAAAAB8k/V6T_rx_LCeE/s320/Rango2011Poster.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5581514779181345458" /></a>It&#8217;s all the raw, untamed, grit of a western combined with eye popping animation to make possibly one of the strangest films about an anthropomorphic reptile in the old west ever seen. His name is Rango (Johnny Depp) and he&#8217;s a fish out of water into a tall glass of Texas tea. Just so no one is confused by my colorful language, he is actually a pet chameleon with an identity disorder who after one particular traffic incident, (or perhaps a blessing in disguise) is literally thrown from his small habitat and into the vast surrounding desert.</p>
<p>Rango arrives in a town called &#8220;Dirt&#8221; where the townsfolk don&#8217;t take kindly to strangers. Where the community lives day to day with a dwindling water supplies and are constantly harassed by outlaws and vicious hawk, Rango becomes a hero and soon enough the town sheriff when he accidentally defeats the hawk. Though beloved by the people, how long can Rango masquerade as a self proclaimed legend? Just leave it to some shady characters to put the town into true peril and ultimately put Rango to the test. </p>
<p>Surprisingly there&#8217;s a great deal of clever storytelling going on here. Though I might have built it up to sound like a &#8220;This town ain&#8217;t big enough fer the two of us&#8221; western, most of the action is actually driven when the town&#8217;s water supply mysteriously vanishes, which results in Rango assembling a posse. So really it&#8217;s a whole mish mash of different types of classic western stories. It&#8217;s a little bit <i>The Searchers</i>, a little bit <i>High Noon</i>, and everything in between. </p>
<p>It took me a little while to adjust to this off-the-wall &#8220;Kids movie&#8221;, but once I did I was cruising like a ghost rider on the storm. The characters are inventive, with a thieving naked mole rat voiced by Harry Dean Stanton and Ned Beatty as the town&#8217;s two-faced tortoise mayor to name a few. The laughs are equally inspired but it&#8217;s the rapid fire pop culture references that steal the show. I mean there&#8217;s references of everything from <i>Grapes of Wrath</i>, to <i>Jurassic Park</i>, to <i>Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas</i> and of course a few obvious nods to the &#8220;The Man With No Name&#8221; trilogy, this is the kind of movie where you blink once and you could miss six different jokes.</p>
<p>Although this movie claims to be &#8220;PG&#8221; never have I seen a PG rating pushed so fearlessly. Mention of a man&#8217;s prostate? Or how about a line like &#8220;I think they&#8217;re thespians.&#8221; with the response of, &#8220;I thought that was illegal in seven states!&#8221; Wow, and my jaw nearly dropped when a character said &#8220;I once found a human spinal column in my fecal excrement.&#8221; This movie may look like it&#8217;s for kids but it certainly doesn&#8217;t sugar coat anything. </p>
<p>Wonderfully animated by Industrial Light &#038; Magic, <i>Rango</i> is classic saturday matinee fun. It&#8217;s a weird and wild one, but worth seeing if you like me have been upset by the definite lack of intriguing movies to open up in theaters lately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=868</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Different Gear, Still Sucking</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=867</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=867#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 06:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Beady Eye &#8211; Different Gear, Still Speeding A Noel Gallagher-less Oasis is like the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles without Leonardo, they can still fight, but without a born leader they&#8217;ll never defeat Shredder. Though I can&#8217;t say I was surprised when Noel left Oasis in 2009, I can say I&#8217;m surprised it didn&#8217;t happen about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Beady Eye &#8211; <i>Different Gear, Still Speeding</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/2.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-iyBN6AjYcco/TW3m61DOK7I/AAAAAAAAB8c/FWS46NCYSJQ/s1600/Different_Gear%252C_Still_Speeding.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 200px; height: 200px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-iyBN6AjYcco/TW3m61DOK7I/AAAAAAAAB8c/FWS46NCYSJQ/s200/Different_Gear%252C_Still_Speeding.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5579369411729304498" /></a><br />A Noel Gallagher-less <i>Oasis</i> is like the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles without Leonardo, they can still fight, but without a born leader they&#8217;ll never defeat Shredder. Though I can&#8217;t say I was surprised when Noel left <i>Oasis</i> in 2009, I can say I&#8217;m surprised it didn&#8217;t happen about 12 years before that. Possibly the biggest media sibling rivalry since Gallagher the comedian and Gallagher II, this was bound to happen eventually. There&#8217;s only so long a dick (Noel) and an even bigger dick (Liam) can be around each other, they&#8217;re like too negative ions trying to bond, just ain&#8217;t gonna happen. So Noel was like &#8220;I&#8217;m tired of this shit&#8221; and left, now we have <i>Beady Eye</i> and I wish we didn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>I was definitely open to the idea of a Noel Gallagher-less <i>Oasis</i>, don&#8217;t get me wrong I love Noel, but I was definitely curious to see how much weight he actually pulled in this band. What could Liam, Andy, Gem, and whoever their drummer is now have cookin&#8217; in the kitchen? It&#8217;s a big &#8216;ol batch of vomit soup. Well no that&#8217;s harsh, let&#8217;s say vomit soup with a hint of lemon. </p>
<p>Okay so it&#8217;s not that bad, but man is this one long, forgettable, blur of generic rock if I&#8217;ve ever heard one. Steve Lilywhite&#8217;s (<i>U2</i>, <i>Big Country</i>) production provides a big rock atmosphere but <i>Beady Eye</i> just doesn&#8217;t have the songs to fill that space. I like the basic Piano-driven groove of &#8220;Bring the Light&#8221; even if it is a tad predictable, but everything else is just devoid of inspiration and originality. I mean if these were the 13 songs they went with what did they turn down? Not to mention some of these songs sound awfully familiar. </p>
<p>&#8220;The Roller is&#8221; strikingly similar to &#8220;Instant Karma&#8221; while &#8220;Beatles and Stones&#8221; is a chord away from being &#8220;My Generation&#8221;. I don&#8217;t mind when a song bears a slight resemblance to a preexisting song, as long as it&#8217;s good but these seem more like they thought &#8220;How much do you think we can change of this song until it sounds like a new song?&#8221; Now try to get through that mindset for over 50 minutes, about 20 minutes too long if you ask me.</p>
<p>Maybe I&#8217;d like this album if I gave it more of a chance, but I really don&#8217;t wanna. Simply put this feels more like the tattered remnants of once great band than just a new good band, I&#8217;m sure whatever Noel delivers will be better than this, at least I hope.</p>
<p><b>Favorite Track:</b> &#8220;Bring the Light&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=867</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>C.A.T: Please Please Me</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=866</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=866#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 04:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Beatles &#8211; Please Please Me (1963) You got to crank out an album from a heavy hitter every once in awhile right? Nah, I just couldn&#8217;t think of anything, basically it was between one Beatles album and another Bealtes album. Please Please Me gets the edge over With the Beatles for a handful of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">The Beatles &#8211; <i>Please Please Me (1963)</i></span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-iyKrg3HdI6o/TW3jpgjMx2I/AAAAAAAAB8U/oEkKpIlvB9I/s1600/PleasePleaseMe.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 200px; height: 200px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-iyKrg3HdI6o/TW3jpgjMx2I/AAAAAAAAB8U/oEkKpIlvB9I/s200/PleasePleaseMe.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5579365815633626978" /></a>You got to crank out an album from a heavy hitter every once in awhile right? Nah, I just couldn&#8217;t think of anything, basically it was between one <i>Beatles</i> album and another <i>Bealtes</i> album.  <i>Please Please Me</i> gets the edge over <i>With the Beatles</i> for a handful of reasons; more Lennon and McCartney compositions, some of the best early <i>Beatles</i> hits and hey, this is where it all started man, the birth of Beatlemania, very fab.</p>
<p><i>Please Please Me</i> showcases all the charm and style of <i>The Beatle&#8217;s</i> early sound; high energy pop songs, more traditional rock songs and pleasing covers often of soft ballads (with the exception of the iconic &#8220;Twist and Shout&#8221;) You could almost use this one album as a transitional piece from the classic rock/pop of the 50s to the birth of the &#8220;Sixties Sound&#8221; whatever that is in your mind. It&#8217;s like they took where Buddy Holly left off and took rock to heights so great it could only be labeled as an invasion. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s amazing how with all the passing years this album doesn&#8217;t feel at all dated, what&#8217;s up with that? Is it the strength of the compositions? The production? Maybe a little bit of both? I&#8217;ll mark all of the above on that one. I&#8217;d love to do this album the justice it deserves with a more comprehensive review, but do you want to know a secret? I&#8217;m so tired… Uh oh I better stop now or I&#8217;ll just be working <i>Beatles</i> song names into my sentences, there&#8217;s a place for that. </p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;I Saw Her Standing There&#8221;, &#8220;Love Me Do&#8221;, &#8220;There&#8217;s a Place&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=866</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>King A Da Limbs</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=865</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=865#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 23:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Radiohead &#8211; The King Of Limbs Radiohead albums are always a lot to take in, seeing as though they&#8217;re always so meticulously crafted. &#160;I don&#8217;t think I really &#8220;got&#8221; In Rainbows until about three or four months after it came out. &#160;So forgive me if I get everything completely wrong about Radiohead&#8217;s latest release The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Radiohead &#8211; <i>The King Of Limbs</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-r08sfHAfy6Y/TW18Znc2-ZI/AAAAAAAAA-k/O7FpTVVkvNg/s1600/radiohead-the-king-of-limbs.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-r08sfHAfy6Y/TW18Znc2-ZI/AAAAAAAAA-k/O7FpTVVkvNg/s200/radiohead-the-king-of-limbs.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<p>Radiohead albums are always a lot to take in, seeing as though they&#8217;re always so meticulously crafted. &nbsp;I don&#8217;t think I really &#8220;got&#8221; <i>In Rainbows</i> until about three or four months after it came out. &nbsp;So forgive me if I get everything completely wrong about Radiohead&#8217;s latest release <i>The King Of Limbs</i>.</p>
<p>With the first few tracks you get the idea that Radiohead are a bit more interested in the rhythmic quality of the songs, as &#8220;Bloom&#8221; and &#8220;Mr. Magpie&#8221; have this strange schizophrenic sound that&#8217;s owed mostly to drummer Phil Selway and bassist Colin Greenwood. &nbsp;As we get deeper into <i>The King Of Limbs</i>, you get more of that same minimalist quality that we saw on <i>In Rainbows</i>, as Jonny Greenwood and Thom Yorke seem to be quite good at putting just the right amount into their sonic palettes without anything feeling too cluttered or overtly atmospheric.</p>
<p>Unsurprisingly,&nbsp;<i>In Rainbows</i> is the Radiohead release that <i>The King Of Limbs</i> most resembles, but with a song like &#8220;Feral&#8221; we hear shades of Kid A, while the album&#8217;s closer, &#8220;Separator&#8221; kind of sounds like something from the OK Computer era. &nbsp;So basically what I&#8217;m getting at is that Radiohead don&#8217;t do a whole lot in the way of breaking new ground, but there&#8217;s still a lot of really beautiful stuff throughout the album. &nbsp;And at a mere 37 minutes, <i>The King of Limbs</i>&nbsp;can&#8217;t help but feel a little bit slapdash, or at least by Radiohead standards.</p>
<p>When speaking about the Marx Brothers, critic James Agee once said &#8220;the worst thing they might ever make would be better than most things I can think of&#8221;, and I think that applies to Radiohead as well. &nbsp;<i>The King Of Limb</i>s might not be a gamechanger, or even one of Radiohead&#8217;s best albums, but it&#8217;s still pretty darn fantastic nonetheless.</p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;Lotus Flower&#8221;, &#8220;Give Up The Ghost&#8221;, &#8220;Separator&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=865</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Speakin&#8217; Da King&#8217;s English</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=864</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=864#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 05:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I feel like this post gets harder to write every year. So either I&#8217;m getting lazier, or I&#8217;m still a little disoriented by all the chocolate cream pie and cream soda. So another year, another Oscar ceremony in the can and thus my yearly reflection of the night of a thousand stars. To start I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/--bXWm8lwA2s/TWtFbrpBjgI/AAAAAAAAB8M/nQ_Ui5G3Tpg/s1600/t1larg.kingsspeech.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 225px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/--bXWm8lwA2s/TWtFbrpBjgI/AAAAAAAAB8M/nQ_Ui5G3Tpg/s400/t1larg.kingsspeech.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5578628905302068738" /></a><br />I feel like this post gets harder to write every year. So either I&#8217;m getting lazier, or I&#8217;m still a little disoriented by all the chocolate cream pie and cream soda.</p>
<p>So another year, another Oscar ceremony in the can and thus my yearly reflection of the night of a thousand stars. To start I thought I&#8217;d mention that this year friends and I definitely made an event out of the Oscars. I&#8217;m talking snack platters, wings, dip, and even some sweet, sweet, cream pie. Everyone had their ballots and we were ready for laughs and excitement, of which we unfortunately received very little. This could be due in part to many factors, but I&#8217;m gonna start with the most evident. I mean I like James Franco and Anne Hathaway as much as the next person, but it takes a certain kind of personality to host the Oscars and tonight we just didn&#8217;t get that. </p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t the Oscars learn anything after the so-so Hugh Jackman hosting gig? I mean he had a pretty good opening bit, but his lacking comedic skills basically made the rest of the night a forgettable blur. So what did they do the next year? They played it safe and got Steve Martin and Alec Baldwin and the results? It was great! So I guess that means it was the &#8220;duo formula&#8221; that made it work? Wrong, it&#8217;s because they were veteran performers with great comedic chops and you can&#8217;t just force that kind of comedic timing out of anyone. I don&#8217;t think I laughed once at the forced antics of Franco and Hathaway and almost couldn&#8217;t watch all the nervous laughter and dead air. Though even more so I think you can blame this year&#8217;s Oscar producers. </p>
<p>Oh yeah the actual nominees&#8230; Uh well, I did alright on my picks (about 13 for 24) but there were a few mild surprises. I was surprised by Fincher&#8217;s snub, but I could tell early on it was shaping up to be <i>The King&#8217;s Speech&#8217;s</i> night. I was surprised to see Randy Newman pick up another oscar for <i>Toy Story 3</i> and Rick Baker nab his seventh makeup oscar for <i>The Wolfman</i> I mean that movie totally sucked, but I&#8217;ve always loved Baker&#8217;s work. </p>
<p>Hmm, I seem to be drawing a blank but overall it was a bit of a disappointing oscar ceremony. Few too laughs and not enough F-bombs, something to consider for next year I suppose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=864</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Than I Wanted to Know</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=863</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=863#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 07:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unknown Let&#8217;s be clear about one thing: Unknown wanted to be 2011&#8242;s Taken. It was released early in the year, has a sexy European setting, is practically a one-man Liam Neeson show and is about him trying to get something back. This time it&#8217;s his identity, a bit more abstract an idea, and it all [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><i>Unknown</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/2.5.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-Np5AWbH_e_0/TWpWoyi1SuI/AAAAAAAAA_g/dieikARu7Cw/s1600/Unknown_Poster.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-Np5AWbH_e_0/TWpWoyi1SuI/AAAAAAAAA_g/dieikARu7Cw/s320/Unknown_Poster.jpg" width="217" /></a></div>
<p>Let&#8217;s be clear about one thing: <i>Unknown </i>wanted to be 2011&#8242;s <i>Taken</i>. It was released early in the year, has a sexy European setting, is practically a one-man Liam Neeson show and is about him trying to get something back. This time it&#8217;s his identity, a bit more abstract an idea, and it all goes downhill from there.</p>
<p>The film opens with a loving couple arriving in Berlin for a big biochemistry convention, or something. Anyway, the big man accidentally leaves his suitcase at the airport and he has to go back. Unfortunately for him, his taxi gets in a terrible accident and he wakes up in the hospital days later. When he tries to meet with his wife he finds her with another man &#8211; who goes by his name. Indeed, somehow this other man knows everything about the life of Dr. Martin Harris. So, how did he manage to steal Harris&#8217; life? Or is there something even more sinister going on here?</p>
<p>Well it sure takes a long time to find out. At almost two hours, <i>Unknown </i>is able to twist a little too much. This should have been an action movie, and the action sequences are quite good, but much of our time is spent wandering, contemplating. And as the truth slowly, <i>slowly</i>, is revealed, the movie goes from exciting to a bit of a letdown. That said, Neeson is good, the supporting cast is fine, and there is at least one good chase scene in the movie. Surprising lack of ass kicking, though.</p>
<p>Ultimately I was fine with having seen <i>Unknown</i>, but did I chastise my friends who chose not to see it? No, they didn&#8217;t really miss anything. If you like Liam Neeson playing the confused yet capable action guy, you might get a kick out of this movie. Otherwise, well, I dunno, go see something else. The pickings are pretty slim these days, however. Maybe buy a video game instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=863</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>British Space Nazis</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=862</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=862#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 06:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Killzone 3 The second Killzone game came out under some pretty intense pressure. The original trailer seemed, and in fact was, too good to be true. Killzone 3 not only needed to be one of the PlayStation 3&#8242;s first killer apps, it needed to be Sony&#8217;s Halo. That&#8217;s asking a lot for a sequel to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><i>Killzone 3</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-l1auXsG2SEg/TWnxloewVeI/AAAAAAAAA_c/ld443WrgGHA/s1600/Killzone_3.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-l1auXsG2SEg/TWnxloewVeI/AAAAAAAAA_c/ld443WrgGHA/s320/Killzone_3.jpg" width="276" /></a></div>
<p>The second <i>Killzone </i>game came out under some pretty intense pressure. The original trailer seemed, and in fact was, too good to be true. <i>Killzone 3 </i>not only needed to be one of the PlayStation 3&#8242;s first killer apps, it needed to be Sony&#8217;s <i>Halo</i>. That&#8217;s asking a lot for a sequel to a hyped-but-largely-forgotten PS2 game. Did <i>Killzone 2 </i>deliver? Well, it looked really good and the single player campaign had some incredible moments. The multiplayer had an interesting take on the idea of game modes, and ultimately the game was successful. That said, a lot of people struggled with the controls, and the game never felt like it was quite in the same league as <i>Halo 3 </i>and <i>Call of Duty 4</i>. Now it&#8217;s a few years later and <i>Killzone </i>is back and better than ever.</p>
<p><i>Killzone 3 </i>picks up immediately after the ending of the last game. Like, literally, seconds later. Once again you play as Sev and are teamed up with resident douchebag Rico. You&#8217;re still stranded on your enemy&#8217;s home world, desperately struggling to put an end to the war between the ISA and the Helghast, who are, as you might remember, basically British space nazis. With Brian Cox dead, the Helghast are caught it in a leadership struggle, between the rightful heir Ray Winstone and the chairman of a massive PMC, Malcolm McDowell. The story is great for giving you exciting battles in visually interesting locales, but the actual dialogue is pretty flimsy. Malcolm McDowell is great as the main villain. I really enjoyed that the biggest threat to our heroes was the constant infighting, even though the payoff for that was not written that well.</p>
<p>The actually gameplay of <i>Killzone 3 </i>is so much more satisfying. The controls have been tightened up something fierce, if I hear anyone complaining about the controls this time around, I might have to destroy them. Everything feels faster and smoother. There are a numerous sequences when you won&#8217;t be on foot, instead you&#8217;ll be the gunner in a few vehicles, drive a mech, and even fly with a crazy jet pack. This is always fun, although I did feel a few moments made it way to easy for you to die. You&#8217;re supposed to feel empowered at those segments, not worried about getting blown up.</p>
<p><i>Killzone 3 </i>is really good. The characters are fleshed out really well, the combat is top notch, the graphics are still shockingly good. The singleplayer campaign will keep you going for a few hours, the mutliplayer many more hours after that. This is an awesome game and a welcome addition among the PlayStation 3 library.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=862</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Baby Hooker</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=861</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=861#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 06:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[30 Rock &#8211; &#8220;TGS Hates Women&#8221; Well, congratulations 30 Rock. You made a joke about &#8220;v cards,&#8221; something I&#8217;m pretty sure Kevin invented on one of our many trips to Seattle&#8217;s own Dicks restaurant. I don&#8217;t know how to deal with that. I don&#8217;t think I have the capability to deal with that. This week&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><i>30 Rock</i> &#8211; &#8220;TGS Hates Women&#8221;</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-xsyznmZPj4M/TWnCQ4zBJ-I/AAAAAAAAA_Y/IQ4nu5sEHFA/s1600/Screen+shot+2011-02-26+at+7.15.35+PM.png" imageanchor="1"><img border="0" src="https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-xsyznmZPj4M/TWnCQ4zBJ-I/AAAAAAAAA_Y/IQ4nu5sEHFA/s1600/Screen+shot+2011-02-26+at+7.15.35+PM.png" width="430" /></a></div>
<p>Well, congratulations <i>30 Rock</i>. You made a joke about &#8220;v cards,&#8221; something I&#8217;m pretty sure Kevin invented on one of our many trips to Seattle&#8217;s own Dicks restaurant. I don&#8217;t know how to deal with that. I don&#8217;t think I have the capability to deal with that.</p>
<p>This week&#8217;s Jack plot had him dueling with the heiress to the Kabletown dynasty, Hit Girl (I can&#8217;t remember the character&#8217;s name and the actress&#8217; name is hard to remember how to spell). Jack wants to divert her interests into marine biology, killing the competition at an early age. However, this backfires as Jack finds himself swept up in the world of marine biology, like he was when he was a boy. It turns out Hit Girl is a worthy opponent, and was herself trying to destroy Jack. I hope we get more of her in the future.</p>
<p>But the titular story has to do with Liz feeling bad for making TGS one of the least feminist shows on television. It turns out that even with Tracy gone, she just writes lots of jokes about women being on their period. So Liz hires an edgy comedienne, who apparently is a bimbo. So Liz and Jenna agree to destroy her, only to find out that she was behaving the way she was because she was hiding from her ex-husband. It was a weird story that fell flat in a few places, but I still do enjoy watching Liz try to do a good thing and inadvertently doing a terrible thing. Jenna being there, cheering Liz on, thinking everything was intentional, was a good touch.</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s Jack story that will stick with you, as usual. I know there&#8217;s talk sometimes of Alec Baldwin leaving the show, I don&#8217;t know why but I hear things. And, sure, <i>30 Rock </i>has a big, funny cast. But Jack is right at the center of it all and this show could not exist without him. If he goes, so does the show. I decree it, and therefore it shall be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=861</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>177</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Skywriting isn&#8217;t Always Positive</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=860</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=860#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 06:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Parks and Recreation &#8211; &#8220;Indianapolis&#8221; I think, as usual, Ron wins this weeks Parks and Recreation. Why? Because he got to say this: &#8220;You may have thought you heard me say I wanted a lot of bacon and eggs, but what I said was: Give me all the bacon and eggs you have.&#8221; You see, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><i>Parks and Recreation</i> &#8211; &#8220;Indianapolis&#8221;</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-_R9Cu4JW5Q8/TWm_w45m4AI/AAAAAAAAA_U/-8XYPRnYgjQ/s1600/indianapolis.jpg" imageanchor="1"><img border="0" src="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-_R9Cu4JW5Q8/TWm_w45m4AI/AAAAAAAAA_U/-8XYPRnYgjQ/s1600/indianapolis.jpg" width="430" /></a></div>
<p>I think, as usual, Ron wins this weeks <i>Parks and Recreation</i>. Why? Because he got to say this: &#8220;You may have thought you heard me say I wanted a lot of bacon and eggs, but what I said was: Give me all the bacon and eggs you have.&#8221; You see, his favorite steak joint in Indianapolis got shut down, and for whatever reason he can&#8217;t find a single restaurant to give him a satisfying slice of cow. So how did we get to this point? Well, let me tell you.</p>
<p>Leslie and Ron are going to the city to receive a commendation from city hall, a great honor by Leslie&#8217;s standards. But Ann is worried that Chris is cheating on her, so Leslie and Ron stop by Chris&#8217; place in the city to check up on him first. Leslie finds the damning evidence she needs, so Ann shows up at Chris house, looking for an explanation. And he has a good one: he broke up with her. It turns out the big conversation we didn&#8217;t get to see last week was Chris dumping Ann, but in such a nice way that she didn&#8217;t even realize she had been dumped.</p>
<p>The rest of the group are going to Tom&#8217;s bar because a giant of the perfume business is there. Andy and April spend their time trying to see what they can get for free, a charming little game that proves that even if these two are a couple they can still go on adventures. But the focus is on Tom, who is trying to pitch his personal scent to Dennis Feinstein. Feinstein rejects the scent and laughs in Tom&#8217;s face, which breaks his little heart. With everyone else otherwise disposed, it falls on Ben to make Tom feel better, which he succeeds at doing. Ben, who has tried to be distant, finds himself part of the parks and rec family by the end of the episode, even risking his health for his new friends by the end.</p>
<p>I think the long wait to get <i>Parks and Rec. </i>back skewed my appreciation for the show, but I really enjoy each episode every week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=860</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justice Beaver</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=859</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=859#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 06:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Office &#8211; &#8220;Todd Packer&#8221; Well, they can&#8217;t all be winners. This week&#8217;s Office focused on Michael&#8217;s oldest friend, Todd Packer. Packer, you might remember, is a huge jerk who makes everyone uncomfortable with his mean sense of humor. The character has been consistently used as someone whom everyone hates, which means he&#8217;s pretty hard [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><i>The Office</i> &#8211; &#8220;Todd Packer&#8221;</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-A-YiJHQNTx0/TWm_VP1-NxI/AAAAAAAAA_Q/9ymWGZrUxHU/s1600/toddpacker.jpg" imageanchor="1"><img border="0" width="430" src="https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-A-YiJHQNTx0/TWm_VP1-NxI/AAAAAAAAA_Q/9ymWGZrUxHU/s1600/toddpacker.jpg" /></a></div>
<p>Well, they can&#8217;t all be winners. This week&#8217;s <i>Office </i>focused on Michael&#8217;s oldest friend, Todd Packer. Packer, you might remember, is a huge jerk who makes everyone uncomfortable with his mean sense of humor. The character has been consistently used as someone whom everyone hates, which means he&#8217;s pretty hard for the audience to like. You&#8217;d think with an episode like they, the show would endeavor to humanize Packer in some way. It kind of did, but it failed.</p>
<p>So Packer wants a job in the office. He&#8217;s tired of being on the road and maybe wants to get to know his daughter better. Of course Michael is fine with him returning, fast-tracking his return with Holly&#8217;s help. Holly has never met Packer and doesn&#8217;t realize the full extant of what she has done. Some bad hump-related humor later, and everyone is desperate to get rid of Packer. Dwight and Jim team up to prank him out of there, but Michael finds out about their scheme. Then Packer makes the mistake of insulting Holly to Michael&#8217;s face, so Michael let&#8217;s him go.</p>
<p>Frankly, the &#8220;this guy&#8217;s a jerk&#8221; humor just doesn&#8217;t work for me. I thought the show could do a lot better, since it is pretty much the master of uncomfortable situations. Instead, Packer just comes off as an unbelievable asshole, and it&#8217;s pretty hard to believe Michael still doesn&#8217;t realize it (especially since he has realized it before). Jim and Dwight&#8217;s scheme didn&#8217;t even seem that clever, I guess Packer just realize is that stupid.</p>
<p>In other news, Pam gave Erin a fancy new computer. Andy is jealous, so he convinces Pam to let him destroy his computer so that she can buy him a new one. Once again, this could have worked in a more interesting way, but Andy comes off looking like a selfish jerk. Which he is, actually. But there was some potential to this episode, it just never quite got there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=859</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>102</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pop Pop</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=858</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=858#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 06:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Community &#8211; &#8220;Intro to Political Science&#8221; I salute Community for poking fun at the vice president, a target that hasn&#8217;t been as utilized for comedy as I would have imagined. But, then again, lot&#8217;s of things haven&#8217;t turned out the way I thought they would back in late 2008. Anyway, this was the political episode [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><i>Community</i> &#8211; &#8220;Intro to Political Science&#8221;</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-ofK1zVwQlcs/TWm-4OkTqWI/AAAAAAAAA_M/__2vSf_RYI8/s1600/community+feb+24+B.JPG" imageanchor="1"><img border="0" src="https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-ofK1zVwQlcs/TWm-4OkTqWI/AAAAAAAAA_M/__2vSf_RYI8/s1600/community+feb+24+B.JPG" width="430" /></a></div>
<p>I salute <i>Community </i>for poking fun at the vice president, a target that hasn&#8217;t been as utilized for comedy as I would have imagined. But, then again, lot&#8217;s of things haven&#8217;t turned out the way I thought they would back in late 2008. Anyway, this was the political episode of the show, in which the satire was so twisted I&#8217;m not even sure I get it.</p>
<p>Jumpin&#8217; Joe Biden is on his way to Greendale to meet with the dean and the school president, who doesn&#8217;t exist. So the dean has a few hours to rush through the election process before the vice president shows up. The nominees are narrowed by applause, then judged in a debate. As they are narrowed down, to front runners emerge &#8211; Jeff and Annie. Annie makes her campaign about one issue, while Jeff speaks in broad generalities and reinforces his love for America. Satire!</p>
<p>Ultimately, the friends back down, leaving the election in the hands of the school&#8217;s dark horse political geniuses, Leonard and Magnitude. They find themselves locked in a never-ending struggle, both of them relying solely on their catchphrases, &#8220;pop pop&#8221; and blowing a raspberry. At the same time, Jeff and Annie have a backstage conversation that shows, once again, that they are a great match except for the age thing.</p>
<p>Also, Abed is the only one to notice the presence of the secret service, which results in him wooing an agent. This was a good episode for Abed, he also got a lot of mileage co-hosting the TV coverage of the debate with Troy &#8220;Butt Soup&#8221; Barnes. Pierce is back and got in on the elections as well, but only to get back at another candidate, Vicki, for not lending him a pencil.</p>
<p>A solid episode, for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=858</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>110</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Happy Valenbirthiversary</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=857</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=857#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 03:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Modern Family &#8211; &#8220;Regrets Only&#8221; I&#8217;m sorry I missed most of the shows last week, I was busy and no one else on the blog has any opinion about television at all. As you&#8217;ll remember, last week was the episode with the princess party, which, at the very least, gave Cam and Mitchell something to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><i>Modern Family</i> &#8211; &#8220;Regrets Only&#8221;</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-7u16jzpQDdg/TWm7ILGLoeI/AAAAAAAAA_I/WqFUVy6xWAA/s1600/uploaded_file20110208-5787-c1wpe4-0..jpg" imageanchor="1"><img border="0" src="https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-7u16jzpQDdg/TWm7ILGLoeI/AAAAAAAAA_I/WqFUVy6xWAA/s1600/uploaded_file20110208-5787-c1wpe4-0..jpg" width="430" /></a></div>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry I missed most of the shows last week, I was busy and no one else on the blog has any opinion about television at all. As you&#8217;ll remember, last week was the episode with the princess party, which, at the very least, gave Cam and Mitchell something to do, even if it was the same boring bitchy couple stuff they&#8217;ve been saddled with lately. This week, <i>Modern Family </i>continued to insist that married couples arguing is funny by making Claire pissed off at Phil and Phil not understanding why.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t even really want to recap this one. Phil provided Claire with plenty of things to get angry about, and he spends much of the episode trying to figure out which one it was. He spends the day with Gloria, while Claire goes off with Jay. Eventually they figure out that the issue was that Phil didn&#8217;t listen to Claire&#8217;s advice about eating salad. Phil proves that he does take her advice all the time and we&#8217;re done. How many Claire stories have been about her freaking out about something this season? I feel like that&#8217;s all she does these days.</p>
<p>This all gets in the way of two much more interesting stories. Cam is concerned that Mitchell doesn&#8217;t pay him enough attention, which comes to fruition when Mitchell doesn&#8217;t realize he forgot to mail out invitations to a party until the day of the event. Mitchell freaking out and saving the day is all right, but what I really enjoyed was Cam and Luke organizing party. Any time we have a grown man and a child communicating with headset while only a few feet from each other is a good time.</p>
<p>Finally, Haley is faking a job to get her parents to help her buy a car. Alex is the only one to figure this out, and instead of just telling someone, she tries to expose her sister by taking the family to the restaurant where she supposedly works. Of course her devious plans are thwarted. This story could have been fleshed out into something funny, but it&#8217;s only given enough time for us to know that it happened. Do better <i>Modern Family</i>! Your first season was so good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=857</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rapscallion is Going too Far</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=856</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=856#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 02:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How I Met Your Mother &#8211; &#8220;Garbage Island&#8221; How I Met Your Mother kept pushing forward all the plots it&#8217;s been hinting at this week, which I appreciate since the show is usually somewhat stagnant. Marshall, still grieving the loss of his father, is having trouble getting motivated about work. He has realized that when [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><i>How I Met Your Mother</i> &#8211; &#8220;Garbage Island&#8221;</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-LlEp9cPED2Q/TWm3R3OziAI/AAAAAAAAA_E/Lk1FDRW5_kk/s1600/GarbageIsland.png" imageanchor="1"><img border="0" src="https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-LlEp9cPED2Q/TWm3R3OziAI/AAAAAAAAA_E/Lk1FDRW5_kk/s1600/GarbageIsland.png" width="430" /></a></div>
<p><i>How I Met Your Mother </i>kept pushing forward all the plots it&#8217;s been hinting at this week, which I appreciate since the show is usually somewhat stagnant. Marshall, still grieving the loss of his father, is having trouble getting motivated about work. He has realized that when Lily and he have a child, it would be extremely difficult to change careers, and facing a life sentence at GNB is something Marshall wants to avoid. They&#8217;ve been hinting at his change in employment since that episode in the museum, so it was nice to see the show start paying off on that already.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, Ted has been enlisted by Zoey to retrieve some of her stuff from the Captain. This character reappearing is something I hoped for, but doubted we would get. So I was overjoyed that they gave the Captain his due this week, showing his side of the divorce. While Ted felt he had saved Zoey from a loveless marriage, the Captain tells a different story. From his point of view, his loving wife was stolen away by a mustachioed villain, an act that maritime law demands physical retribution for. Ted and the Captain&#8217;s interactions were fantastic and full of laughs. I hope they can keep bringing him back.</p>
<p>Also, Barney is gearing up for a relationship with Nora, despite his own instincts. Fortunately, he has Robin to encourage him. I&#8217;m getting a little tired of Robin being relegated purely to the voice of wisdom on the show, it&#8217;s been a while since she actually had a story of her own. Anyway, Barney eventually gives in and calls Nora, so that&#8217;s going somewhere, I guess.</p>
<p>But the most important part of the episode was how it was framed. Ted is Hong Kong in the future, a married man with a bad hairdo, and he runs into Wendy the waitress. It turns out hatred for Marshall led to Wendy meeting her husband. More importantly, Ted hinted pretty strongly that his breakup with Zoey occurred at the same wedding we saw in the first episode of the season, the one where we supposedly finally meet Mother. We still don&#8217;t know whose wedding it is, but it definitely is starting to seem like we&#8217;ll be there this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=856</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>C.A.T.: Modern Sounds In Country And Western Music</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=855</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=855#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 03:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ray Charles &#8211; Modern Sounds In Country And Western Music (1962) I was going to do James Brown&#8217;s Live At The Apollo, but then I found out that it wasn&#8217;t actually released until 1963 though it was recorded in 1962, contrary to what my iTunes tells me. &#160;But luckily, 1962 saw the release of another [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Ray Charles &#8211; <i>Modern Sounds In Country And Western Music </i>(1962)</span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-_Cv-ZsLh5XU/TWSCfq0fxWI/AAAAAAAAA-g/oAjcUuayAso/s1600/charles_countryf.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-_Cv-ZsLh5XU/TWSCfq0fxWI/AAAAAAAAA-g/oAjcUuayAso/s200/charles_countryf.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<p>I was going to do James Brown&#8217;s <i>Live At The Apollo</i>, but then I found out that it wasn&#8217;t actually released until 1963 though it was recorded in 1962, contrary to what my iTunes tells me. &nbsp;But luckily, 1962 saw the release of another landmark in &#8217;60s soul with Ray Charles&#8217; genre-bending <i>Modern Sounds In Country And </i><i>Western Music.</i><br /><i><br /></i><br />As we&#8217;ve all learned from the movie <i>Ray</i>, at this point Ray Charles had pretty much established himself as the an artist at the forefront of R&amp;B. &nbsp;So after all the success he had with his great run of singles in the late fifties to early sixties, he decided to try his hand at applying his signature sound to the country and western songs he had grown up hearing. &nbsp; Considering this was at the height of segregation, some saw this as a dicey move, since even then country music was more or less regarded as the music of white hillbillies.</p>
<p>To say this is a country album however would be fairly misleading, as Charles takes these old standards and puts his soulful stamp all over them. &nbsp;And the arrangements of these songs are often a little curious as an approach to country songs, as there&#8217;s lots of strings and big-band pyrotechnics throughout the album. &nbsp;But somehow this approach works pretty magificently more often than not, as demonstrated on some of Charles&#8217; most well-known love songs such as &#8220;You Don&#8217;t Know Me&#8221; and &#8220;I Can&#8217;t Stop Loving You&#8221;.</p>
<p>God, I really need to do a post that isn&#8217;t a CAT</p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;Bye Bye Love&#8221;, &#8220;You Don&#8217;t Know Me&#8221;, &#8220;I Can&#8217;t Stop Loving You&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=855</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Don’t Know Why They Call it a Pomegranate, But it Looks Like a Pomegranate.</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=854</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=854#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2011 18:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bright Eyes &#8211; The People&#8217;s Key So many years of putting off Bright Eyes and once I finally become a fan they release their last album. Unfortunate yes, but what a note to go out on. Granted I haven&#8217;t heard the entire collected works of Conor Oberst, Mike Mogis, and Nate Walcott, but from what [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Bright Eyes &#8211; <i>The People&#8217;s Key</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.5.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Gci3QPZMaV8/TWL79q_pivI/AAAAAAAAB78/jmnyYtGkt94/s1600/Brighteyes_.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 200px; height: 200px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Gci3QPZMaV8/TWL79q_pivI/AAAAAAAAB78/jmnyYtGkt94/s200/Brighteyes_.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5576296325569940210" /></a>So many years of putting off <i>Bright Eyes</i> and once I finally become a fan they release their last album. Unfortunate yes, but what a note to go out on. Granted I haven&#8217;t heard the entire collected works of Conor Oberst, Mike Mogis, and Nate Walcott, but from what I have heard I think this just might be my personal favorite, it may even be a tough one to beat for my favorite album of the year, yeah I&#8217;m serious.</p>
<p>From folk, to rock, to electronic, master songwriter and wordsmith Conor Oberst has taken on ever changing sound often tied together by no more than his own presence and aptitude for the written word. Always backed by his right man hand in producer/multi-instrumentalist Mike Mogis and wild card Nate Walcott, <i>Bright Eyes</i> has pounded out everything from folky protest songs to bittersweet ballads without missing a beat. Their music is intellectual, emotional, beautiful, and <i>The People&#8217;s Key</i> is no exception.</p>
<p>With <i>The People&#8217;s Key</i> we see this trio traversing more modern pop/rock terrain, but with a hint of introspective stoicism and ya know, other philosophical stuff. Thanks to the shaman-like musings of musician Denny Brewer, <i>The People&#8217;s Key</i> maybe the most colorful <i>Bright Eyes</i> record yet. Stories of extraterrestrials, spirituality, and life lessons intertwined with pleasing pop is a surprisingly effective method. Listening to rock music and an absent minded old man at the same time? Sign me up. </p>
<p>Some critics claim that <i>The People&#8217;s Key</i> lyrically pales in comparison to previous <i>Bright Eyes</i> works such as <i>Lifted</i> or <i>I&#8217;m Wide Awake it&#8217;s Morning</i>. Even if this is so, I wouldn&#8217;t let that fact cloud the fact that these are some of Conor&#8217;s best melodies. Musically <i>The People&#8217;s Key</i> is always innovative and exciting, so cut him some slack. I like Conor Oberst but those people that call him the &#8220;Next Dylan&#8221; should stop trying to label things and just enjoy the music. Hopefully the DaMorgue crew can nab tickets for the Bright Eyes/Death Cab show in Bend, Oregon this May. Though we better hurry, if we don&#8217;t it looks like were going to Minneapolis. </p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;Approximate Sunlight&#8221;, &#8220;Shell Games&#8221;, &#8220;Triple Spiral&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=854</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Mistake of British Morning Socks</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=853</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=853#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 00:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How I Met Your Mother &#8211; &#8220;Desperation Day&#8221; I like that How I Met Your Mother is spending a fair amount of time on Marshall and his loss. It would be easy for a sitcom to make it a two-parter and move on, but as &#8220;Desperation Day&#8221; proves, he&#8217;s going through a lot more than [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><i>How I Met Your Mother</i> &#8211; &#8220;Desperation Day&#8221;</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-DCncDujyfM8/TVxq4nXMunI/AAAAAAAAA_A/1_5Ycno-zZc/s1600/DesperationDay1.png" imageanchor="1"><img border="0" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-DCncDujyfM8/TVxq4nXMunI/AAAAAAAAA_A/1_5Ycno-zZc/s1600/DesperationDay1.png" width="430" /></a></div>
<p>I like that <i>How I Met Your Mother </i>is spending a fair amount of time on Marshall and his loss. It would be easy for a sitcom to make it a two-parter and move on, but as &#8220;Desperation Day&#8221; proves, he&#8217;s going through a lot more than grieving. In the season where Marshall and Lily planned on having a child, Marshall is starting to understand what it really means to be an adult and a father. That&#8217;s pretty cool.</p>
<p>However, why is Ted freaking out about Zoey all the sudden? He used to be all about relationships that moved quickly. I guess he just really likes her? Anyway, his freakout brought him back to Minnesota, something I appreciated because Ted and Marshall acting like big kids is funny. They play video games, wear dirty clothes, and flat out refuse switching to orange juice when they run out of Sunny D. That&#8217;s good stuff.</p>
<p>What were the rest of the characters up to? Well, Lily was so lonely she turned her body pillow into a companion, Marshpillow. This lead to some easy jokes, but they still landed, so props to Alyson Hannigan. Robin once again has nothing to do except mock the others and then provide fodder for them. This time Barney is in Predator mode, so Robin brings her friends for him to mock and then later hook up with at the long-awaited lazer tag tournament.</p>
<p><i>How I Met Your Mother </i>is kind of just coasting right now, but so are most shows around the Valentine&#8217;s Day holiday. At least we&#8217;ve got some quality emotional character development for Marshall. It&#8217;s been a good season so far and it shows no signs of changing any time soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=853</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>C.A.T: Two Steps from the Blues</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=852</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=852#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 23:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bobby Bland &#8211; Two Steps from the Blues (1961) Don&#8217;t let the name fool you, there&#8217;s nothing bland about this soulful blues man. Known as the &#8220;Lion of the Blues&#8221;, Bobby &#8220;Blue&#8221; Bland had a voice as powerful as it was sweet, marvelously showcased on perhaps one of the most underrated soul classics of all [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Bobby Bland &#8211; <i>Two Steps from the Blues (1961)</i></span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-VK_t82F4b5s/TVsJGFDJ8MI/AAAAAAAAB70/zPTAcyGJ7FA/s1600/bland-bobby-blue-105-l.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 200px; height: 199px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-VK_t82F4b5s/TVsJGFDJ8MI/AAAAAAAAB70/zPTAcyGJ7FA/s200/bland-bobby-blue-105-l.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5574058963840397506" /></a>Don&#8217;t let the name fool you, there&#8217;s nothing bland about this soulful blues man. Known as the &#8220;Lion of the Blues&#8221;, Bobby &#8220;Blue&#8221; Bland had a voice as powerful as it was sweet, marvelously showcased on perhaps one of the most underrated soul classics of all time <i>Two Steps from the Blues</i>. Stumbling upon this album a few weeks ago without any prior knowledge of it&#8217;s existence, I&#8217;m not lying when I say this plain and simple, blew me away right from the get go. From the opening horns of the leadoff title track, I was sucked right into a soulful R&#038;b wonderland, that track still gives me the chills.</p>
<p>Though no great can be truly great without a little help from their friends and Bobby had some of the best collaborators in the biz. Bandleader/arranger Joe Scott has written and assembled some of the best bluesy classics and wrapped them up in a beautiful big band sound. The quality of the musicianship is off the charts but there&#8217;s one particular band member that stands out in my mind, guitarist Wayne Bennett. Always mixed up as high as the heavens in the sound mix, he just may be my new favorite R&#038;B guitarist. I mean I love Steve Cropper, but this guy definitely gives him a run for his money, he&#8217;s outstanding. </p>
<p>The whole production definitely reminds me of all those great Stax records artists along with legends like Junior Parker and Sam Cooke, good friends with Bobby Bland. Though this is my new favorite arrangement of soul music not just for it&#8217;s talented vocalist, but for literally every aspect of the production. </p>
<p>So you wanna feel good, take a trip back to the heyday of Duke records and the pinnacle of R&#038;b? Just take two steps to the blues and you&#8217;ll find it. </p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;Cry, Cry Cry&#8221;, &#8220;Don&#8217;t Cry No More&#8221;, &#8220;Two Steps from the Blues&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=852</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>R.I.P. Kenneth Mars</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=851</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=851#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 22:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kenneth Mars1936-2011What a shocker, I didn&#8217;t know he was that old, or that he had cancer, but I guess that&#8217;s because he just seemed to keep so busy even into his last years. Yes Kenneth Mars possibly the funniest man to ever impersonate German people has passed on. Famous for his roles in such Mel [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-fWaOygdET-w/TVsE9uqaGnI/AAAAAAAAB7s/THdgmtIdyk4/s1600/1560.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 200px; height: 250px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-fWaOygdET-w/TVsE9uqaGnI/AAAAAAAAB7s/THdgmtIdyk4/s320/1560.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5574054422345554546" /></a><br /><b>Kenneth Mars<br />1936-2011</b><br />What a shocker, I didn&#8217;t know he was that old, or that he had cancer, but I guess that&#8217;s because he just seemed to keep so busy even into his last years. Yes Kenneth Mars possibly the funniest man to ever impersonate German people has passed on. Famous for his roles in such Mel Brooks classics as <i>Young Frankenstein</i> and <i>The Producers</i>, no one could play an over-the-top foreigner like Kenneth Mars and yet he was American, comedic genius. </p>
<p>Though the previously mentioned are possibly his most notable works, Mars had countless roles in notable films including; <i>Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid</i>, <i>What&#8217;s Up Doc?</i>, <i>Radio Days</i>, <i>The Little Mermaid</i> and many TV roles, including; <i>Gunsmoke</i>, <i>Get Smart</i>, <i>Freakazoid</i>, <i>Deep Space Nine</i> and <i>Batman the Animated Series</i> to name a few.</p>
<p>Personally I&#8217;ll always remember him in my favorite performance of his as oblivious German Rancher/Francis&#8217; boss Otto Mankuser on seasons 4 and 5 of <i>Malcolm in the Middle</i>. He was easily one of the funniest characters on the show and will be sorely missed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=851</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Never Sleep in Planes, I Don&#8217;t Want to Get Incepted</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=850</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=850#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 07:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[30 Rock &#8211; &#8220;Double-Edged Sword&#8221; Once again, my chief concern with 30 Rock is not the quality of its episodes, but that it&#8217;s not on until 10 p.m. and by then I&#8217;ve watched Community, waited a half and hour, and the Office and Parks and Recreation. I think I&#8217;ll have to start watching these separately. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><i>30 Rock</i> &#8211; &#8220;Double-Edged Sword&#8221;</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-8MBTXNAGRpw/TVjCiovrv3I/AAAAAAAAA-8/KOb-YZ8Wx7g/s1600/new-30-rock-family.png" imageanchor="1"><img border="0" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-8MBTXNAGRpw/TVjCiovrv3I/AAAAAAAAA-8/KOb-YZ8Wx7g/s1600/new-30-rock-family.png" width="430" /></a></div>
<p>Once again, my chief concern with <i>30 Rock </i>is not the quality of its episodes, but that it&#8217;s not on until 10 p.m. and by then I&#8217;ve watched <i>Community</i>, waited a half and hour, and <i>the Office </i>and <i>Parks and Recreation</i>. I think I&#8217;ll have to start watching these separately.</p>
<p>So this episode is all about double-edged swords. Jack and Avery, who is basically lady Jack, and heading up to Toronto for Valentine&#8217;s Day. But, wuh-oh, baby&#8217;s coming! And since Jack and Avery are hyper patriotic, the idea of having their daughter born outside of the US of A is unacceptable. And while I think having two American parents entitles their child to American citizenship regardless, the couple irrationally tries to get back across the border as Avery goes through labor. They meet John Cho, and it&#8217;s funny.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, Liz is joining Carol for a get-away. Unfortunately, Carol&#8217;s plane never gets airborne, slowly giving all the passengers a bad case of cabin fever. Liz&#8217;s lesser desires put her at odds with Carol, as she tries to act as a heroic leader for the passengers. Carol, who&#8217;s work is insulted by Liz, is too proud to see where she&#8217;s coming from, and holds the airplane hostage. It&#8217;s all pretty stir crazy and pretty funny as well.</p>
<p>The other story involves Tracy, a proud new EGOT winner. While he loves his new status, he hates that he is respected now and expected to do mature things for good causes. It felt kind of familiar and wasn&#8217;t really that funny. Still, this was another great episode that tied all the plots together thematically and threw in some tender one-liners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=850</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It’s Not the Size of the Boat: Embracing Life with a Micropenis</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=849</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=849#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 00:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Parks and Recreation &#8211; &#8220;Ron &#38; Tammy: Part 2&#8243; I&#8217;m not sure about this, but I feel like consensus among Da Morgue&#8217;s staff is that Ron Swanson is the best part of Parks and Recreation. Now I don&#8217;t say that lightly, because the show is really good for each and every one of its cast. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><i>Parks and Recreation</i> &#8211; &#8220;Ron &amp; Tammy: Part 2&#8243;</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/5.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-35yH_FR2Al4/TVjA14wJPwI/AAAAAAAAA-4/VfE81YcgWRY/s1600/4383_pnr_279_ron-n-tammy_001.jpg" imageanchor="1"><img border="0" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-35yH_FR2Al4/TVjA14wJPwI/AAAAAAAAA-4/VfE81YcgWRY/s1600/4383_pnr_279_ron-n-tammy_001.jpg" width="430" /></a></div>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure about this, but I feel like consensus among Da Morgue&#8217;s staff is that Ron Swanson is the best part of <i>Parks and Recreation</i>. Now I don&#8217;t say that lightly, because the show is really good for each and every one of its cast. But there&#8217;s something about Ron&#8217;s insane libertarian manliness that helps him rise to the top. So it is a real privilege that we get an episode focused on him, and boy, this show did not waste that opportunity.</p>
<p>Things start innocently enough, Tammy is in her mess with Ron mood again, but this time Ron is prepared to handle her: he&#8217;s got Wendy. Most of this relationship has been off screen, but from what we can tell Ron and Wendy seem to genuinely have a solid relationship. But that&#8217;s ripped away when Wendy decides she has to go back to Canada, a place Ron will never set foot upon. Heartbroken, matters are made worse for Ron when Tom shows up with Tammy. Knowing Tammy is just using Tom to get at him, Ron leaves with his ex-wife to settle matters once and for all.</p>
<p>The next day, Leslie is bailing Ron out of prison. He&#8217;s wearing a kimono, has dreadlocks and is missing the middle of his mustache. Worst of all, he appears to have married Tammy again. The department tries to intervene and show Ron he&#8217;s making a mistake, but Tammy has blinded him to that logic. Only when he sees her physically beat up Tom does her spell break and Ron escapes from her clutches once again, carrying Tom away.</p>
<p>There were so many great moments, many of which can be summed up with a quote. &#8220;It rubbed off, from friction.&#8221; Ron blankly watching a video of himself telling him to castrate himself. &#8220;Seriously Jerry?&#8221; So good!</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want to neglect the other stories, but this was really Ron&#8217;s show. April is working for Chris temporarily, despite her work ethic Chris wants her to come back with him to Indianapolis. Leslie throws a pizza party for the cops and shows Ben that he is still very much an outsider when it comes to Pawnee. I tell you, <i>Parks and Recreation </i>is definitely making up for lost time, it&#8217;s flying through these plots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=849</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Saving the World Has Never Been This Hard</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=848</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=848#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 00:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Office &#8211; &#8220;PDA&#8221; I&#8217;m gonna say it: The Office is back. I don&#8217;t know for how long, or why it couldn&#8217;t happen sooner, but this show has been consistently solid for a number of weeks now. I still think Gabe is too creepy and awkward in the wrong way for the show, but pretty [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><i>The Office</i> &#8211; &#8220;PDA&#8221;</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-LZyXdI1wjK8/TVi_z8QEA4I/AAAAAAAAA-0/t5EVPuBphaY/s1600/office-286.jpg" imageanchor="1"><img border="0" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-LZyXdI1wjK8/TVi_z8QEA4I/AAAAAAAAA-0/t5EVPuBphaY/s1600/office-286.jpg" width="430" /></a></div>
<p>I&#8217;m gonna say it: <i>The Office </i>is back. I don&#8217;t know for how long, or why it couldn&#8217;t happen sooner, but this show has been consistently solid for a number of weeks now. I still think Gabe is too creepy and awkward in the wrong way for the show, but pretty much everything else they&#8217;ve been doing of late is good. Maybe it&#8217;s just because they&#8217;ve had to put Michael&#8217;s stories in fast forward, but this is the show I used to love.</p>
<p>So after last week&#8217;s big kiss, Michael and Holly are back together. And though Holly seemed hesitant to give into Michael&#8217;s charms over the past few weeks, she is definitely back on the Scott Express. In fact, they&#8217;re so in love that their intimacy has become a problem for the rest of the office. In a meeting (in which Michael sits on Holly&#8217;s lap) Gabe puts a ban on public displays of affection. Michael hates this, but along the way ends up telling Holly he loves her, and she returns the sentiment. When it occurs to Michael that their relationship is going so fast because Holly has to go back to Nashua soon, she tells him the company can&#8217;t run their lives. So Holly moves in with Michael and the PDA ban is (at least temporarily) lifted.</p>
<p>Steve Carell was really good as Michael, running a gamut of emotions and hilarious moments. I lost it when he recorded his movie pitch for <i>Boner Bomb </i>starring Jason Statham or perhaps Eisenberg or Michael Cera. Genius! I&#8217;m glad they&#8217;re bringing back the aspiring filmmaker side of Michael, we haven&#8217;t seen that in a while.</p>
<p>The rest of the stories are pretty meh. Daryl&#8217;s funny when the office mistake his grieving over his grandmother&#8217;s death for his birthday. Pam and Jim are bummed they seem to be the only ones who haven&#8217;t had sex in the office. Erin and Andy try to get through Gabe&#8217;s treasure hunt Valentine&#8217;s Day, further proving that Erin and Andy are apparently required to go through the stupid people version of Pam and Jim&#8217;s romantic arc.</p>
<p>Steve Carell, what will this show be without you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=848</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gravedigger&#8217;s Biscuits</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=847</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=847#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=847</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Community &#8211; &#8220;Early 21st Century Romanticism&#8221; An episode of Community like &#8220;Early 21st Century Romanticism,&#8221; as Todd Van Der Werff points out over at The AV Club, feels more season one than season two. Community of late has been so much bigger than just a college event episode like this. After all, we&#8217;ve had zombie [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><i>Community</i> &#8211; &#8220;Early 21st Century Romanticism&#8221;</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-xWe2cqtasVY/TVYbfvCLtlI/AAAAAAAAA-w/7oBrURfgdlk/s1600/COMMUNITY-Early-21st-Century-Romanticism-9-550x365.jpg" imageanchor="1"><img border="0" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-xWe2cqtasVY/TVYbfvCLtlI/AAAAAAAAA-w/7oBrURfgdlk/s1600/COMMUNITY-Early-21st-Century-Romanticism-9-550x365.jpg" width="430" /></a></div>
<p>An episode of <i>Community </i>like &#8220;Early 21st Century Romanticism,&#8221; as Todd Van Der Werff points out over at <a href="http://www.avclub.com/articles/early-21st-century-romanticism,51562/">The AV Club</a>, feels more season one than season two. <i>Community </i>of late has been so much bigger than just a college event episode like this. After all, we&#8217;ve had zombie outbreaks (that remained in continuity), claymated Christmas wonderlands and even an episode that had our characters bar hopping.</p>
<p>It makes you wonder what direction the show is heading in. With a title like &#8220;Community,&#8221; the characters don&#8217;t necessarily have to stay in community college. They can branch out beyond Greendale when it comes time to graduate. Or maybe they&#8217;ll all become Greendale faculty. Who knows? What is clear is that <i>Community </i>has become much more grandiose than episodes about a Valentine&#8217;s dance, so it&#8217;s refreshing that &#8220;Early 21st Century Romanticism&#8221; works.</p>
<p>Of course it works by relying on the show&#8217;s great cast of characters, breaking them up into little groups for fun little stories. Troy and Abed both ask the sexy librarian out and ask her to choose one of them to date, only to realize that what they really need is not someone for one of them, but both of them. Britta loves gloating about her lesbian friend, who is actually straight and thinks that Britta is the lesbian (this gave us a great Pierce moment in the cold open). But the most important story of the episode is probably Jeff&#8217;s accidental party.</p>
<p>You see, since Jeff is cool, he&#8217;s forced himself to like soccer. And since Duncan is British, he invites himself over to Jeff&#8217;s to watch a game. Jeff can&#8217;t say no, since he&#8217;s arguing with the group over what bands they like. Unsurprisingly, Chang latches on to this opportunity to try to get closer to Jeff, or maybe just to get a warm bed. But Chang brings a bunch of people, starting a party that Jeff seems to be OK with. As the party goes on, Jeff realizes just how pathetic Chang is, and invites him to stay at his place, which hopefully will provide for some classic moments in the future.</p>
<p>But the big moment of the night is the last shot, Pierce passed out on a park bench, alone. He&#8217;s been dealing with a pill addiction, manifested by Andy Dick, and over the past few weeks has grown increasingly antagonistic with the group. I love that Pierce has had an arc like this, from breaking his legs on the trampoline through last week&#8217;s episode. It really impresses me that despite how wacky <i>Community </i>is, it never comps out. There is an actual continuity to the show. Making the wait for this week&#8217;s episode even more painful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=847</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Down Zonoscope</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=846</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=846#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Feb 2011 00:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=846</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cut Copy &#8211; Zonoscope I remember one time I was riding along with Paul and he was playing Cut Copy in his car and I was just thinking, &#8220;Why does this sound so familiar?&#8221; So I did a little research and realized, I&#8217;d actually seen them live. Yeah in October 2005, opening for TV on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Cut Copy &#8211; <i>Zonoscope</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-GzgZSkQw_Zw/TVch0E-OMnI/AAAAAAAAB7k/G5EVTvi6E7I/s1600/Zonoscope.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 200px; height: 200px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-GzgZSkQw_Zw/TVch0E-OMnI/AAAAAAAAB7k/G5EVTvi6E7I/s200/Zonoscope.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5572960242465911410" /></a>I remember one time I was riding along with Paul and he was playing <i>Cut Copy</i> in his car and I was just thinking, &#8220;Why does this sound so familiar?&#8221; So I did a little research and realized, I&#8217;d actually seen them live. Yeah in October 2005, opening for <i>TV on the Radio</i> and <i>Franz Ferdinand</i>, the funny thing is that Paul didn&#8217;t even remember we saw them and he was the one playing them in his car. The thing is when they came on that night in 2005, they weren&#8217;t on the ticket, weren&#8217;t introduced, and when they started playing I was like &#8220;What is this? Is this like a band? Are these roadies or something?&#8221; It was just two guys with synths, beat machines, and guitars that randomly took the stage. They were okay but I just didn&#8217;t know what was going on or who they were and it took me a good five years to find out. </p>
<p>Flash forward to earlier this week and I saw they had a new album, so here I am now giving them a shot. All I remembered is they were sort of an electronic group, but they&#8217;ve expanded since then. Adding two more guys this is more like a rock band with synths then just an electro/pop duo. The material brings to mind bands like <i>Duran Duran</i> and <i>Pet Shop Boys</i> but if their lead singer was really sleepy, like Matt Berninger from <i>The National</i>. So the result is kind of new wave, kind of shoegazing pop, and everything in between. </p>
<p>Something I really should of considered before giving this album a whirl is, do I really like new wave music? Not particularly, but I&#8217;m open minded and definitely prepared myself for the possibility that this album could be a bit dull. Is it dull? Well sometimes, yeah but I love the retro instrumentation so it&#8217;s a bit of a mixed bag. </p>
<p>Though I have no regrets about getting this album as I got to hear the pleasurable tune &#8220;Where I&#8217;m Going&#8221; easily the best song on the album. It almost sounds like it belongs on another record entirely. Where the bulk of the album is moody new wave, this sounds like 60s pop (Think &#8220;Dragging the Line&#8221; if Tommy James had recorded it with synthesizers.) It&#8217;s a great pop song. Other tunes like &#8220;Nee You Know&#8221; and &#8220;Take Me Over&#8221; (which sounds a lot like fellow Aussie classic &#8220;Down Under&#8221;) are enjoyable enough, though they can get a little redundant with most songs well beyond five minutes (last song is 15, like I had enough energy for that.) I like to think new wave fans like this but for me, it&#8217;s just okay.</p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;Pharaohs &#038; Pyramids&#8221;, &#8220;Take Me Over&#8221;, &#8220;Where I&#8217;m Going&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=846</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You Can&#8217;t Win Valentine&#8217;s Day</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=845</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=845#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 05:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Modern Family &#8211; &#8220;Bixby&#8217;s Back&#8221; With a show like Modern Family, it&#8217;s especially hard to escape the holiday trap. Christmas, Halloween, Valentine&#8217;s Day, while they need not feature in all shows, with a family-centric sitcom, you can&#8217;t really skip them. That said, you should at least try to do something new. I don&#8217;t mean for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><i>Modern Family</i> &#8211; &#8220;Bixby&#8217;s Back&#8221;</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-ZWCaLCp_Rqo/TVYWx4f2VeI/AAAAAAAAA-s/jOHcacXCsI0/s1600/119108_208_pre.jpg" imageanchor="1"><img border="0" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-ZWCaLCp_Rqo/TVYWx4f2VeI/AAAAAAAAA-s/jOHcacXCsI0/s1600/119108_208_pre.jpg" width="430" /></a></div>
<p>With a show like <i>Modern Family</i>, it&#8217;s especially hard to escape the holiday trap. Christmas, Halloween, Valentine&#8217;s Day, while they need not feature in all shows, with a family-centric sitcom, you can&#8217;t really skip them. That said, you should at least try to do something new. I don&#8217;t mean for the genre as a whole. I mean don&#8217;t do exactly the same thing you did last year.</p>
<p>Last year, Phil and Claire assumed aliases for a romantic misadventure in a hotel. This year, they went to a restaurant full of elderly patrons driving around in those mart cart things. Claire doesn&#8217;t like feeling that old, so she puts last year&#8217;s plan back in motion. They have a rendezvous in the same hotel bar, then an accidental key card switch results in painfully telegraphed &#8220;hilarity.&#8221; I don&#8217;t blame the writers for doing this, Phil playing his Clive Bixby character is still really funny, and the whole seen at the bar is really great. I just wish they could have done something a little more inventive.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, Jay is trying to surprise Gloria with a dinner at home, but he has to get her out of the house first. His desire is to make his wife look foolish by getting her to angry leave a restaurant, then to be swept off her feet when she see&#8217;s what he&#8217;s done at home. But things don&#8217;t go the way he planned! WHAT A TWIST!</p>
<p>Despite being at the center of some of the funniest episodes, Cam and Mitchell continue to have really, painfully weak subplots. This time they&#8217;re confused about which of them Mitchell&#8217;s secretary has a crush on, so they argue about that for a while. The kids have nothing much going on, Manny is trying to seduce Haley, who is technically her niece. Haley is just sad about not having a boyfriend. I think I noticed the actress who plays Haley in an Olive Garden commercial yesterday.</p>
<p>Anyway, &#8220;Bixby&#8217;s Back&#8221; was funny because, well, Bixby&#8217;s back. But the rest of the episode felt pretty formulaic, in a bad way. You can do better <i>Modern Family</i>. I&#8217;ve seen you do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=845</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lights Out</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=844</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=844#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 05:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Friday Night Lights &#8211; &#8220;Always&#8221; The funny thing about saying goodbye to Friday Night Lights is that I&#8217;m not really sure when I started liking the show. I remember thinking the first season was overly melodramatic, and that the second season took some really stupid subplots and dragged them through more of the season than [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><i>Friday Night Lights</i> &#8211; &#8220;Always&#8221;</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/5.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-WlmWMRDgGoQ/TVYRwyL-SiI/AAAAAAAAA-o/Qryb9FqSUh0/s1600/hswgjcrd.jpg" imageanchor="1"><img border="0" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-WlmWMRDgGoQ/TVYRwyL-SiI/AAAAAAAAA-o/Qryb9FqSUh0/s640/hswgjcrd.jpg" width="430" /></a></div>
<p>The funny thing about saying goodbye to <i>Friday Night Lights</i> is that I&#8217;m not really sure when I started liking the show. I remember thinking the first season was overly melodramatic, and that the second season took some really stupid subplots and dragged them through more of the season than they should have. The third season upset me because the show&#8217;s dedication to making characters that were clearly in their 20s in the first season still high school students was bothersome. The fourth season was the dreaded paradigm shift, with new characters that weren&#8217;t instantly that likable. But by this fifth and final season, I couldn&#8217;t get enough of <i>Friday Night Lights</i>.</p>
<p><i>Friday Night Lights </i>has always been about underdogs, be they individuals or an entire team, which is fitting because the show itself was an underdog. It never got the best ratings, despite being a great show with a dedicated fanbase and tons of critical adoration. But unlike so many great shows that buckled under the ratings monster, <i>FNL </i>endured, lasting long enough to let itself grow and finally deliver a satisfying conclusion to this big drama set in the small, fictional town of Dillon, Texas.</p>
<p>The heart of the show was always Coach Eric Taylor (Kyle Chandler) and his wife Tammie (<i>Spin City </i>veteran Connie Britton). So it was a shame that so much of the finale was dedicated to an argument between the two. Not because they shouldn&#8217;t argue, because the whole point of the episode was how couples have to make compromises, but because the argument was so unnecessary. Everyone knew what the right decision to make was at the end of the penultimate episode, so this episode had to go out of its way to make the audience understand why Coach would want to go back to West Dillon. But I get that Coach&#8217;s time in Dillon has been the best he&#8217;s ever had, and it&#8217;s not easy to let go of that.</p>
<p>Of course everything is settled by State, as what kind of sports series would have conflicts that can&#8217;t be resolved by a championship? In the meantime, we got speedy conclusions for all the remaining season one holdovers: Matt proposes to Julie, Tyra somewhat rekindles with Tim, Tim makes peace with his family and decides to stay, Landry gets left alone, even though he had a more meaningful relationship with Tyra. All of our East Dillon friends found a home on the super team, even Buddy, Jr. and the other new guy who were set up as important characters but didn&#8217;t end up doing anything for the story. Luke gives his championship ring to Becky as he leaves for the military. All is well.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s still more to list, but that&#8217;s all getting pretty tedious. Needless to say, any of the plots that had made it as far as season five were put to rest. Basically I just wanted to post this review because I&#8217;ve come to really appreciate the time I got to spend with <i>FNL</i>. It was amazing to see how talented the cast became over the years, how well put-together the show remained. I&#8217;ll especially miss it&#8217;s marvelous score. I don&#8217;t particularly like football or high school melodrama, but someone this show made it work. For that, I&#8217;m grateful.</p>
<p>Clear eyes, full hearts, can&#8217;t lose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=844</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Undercover Brother</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=843</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=843#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 22:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The moment has finally come for Strokes fans, what do you call Strokes fans? &#8220;Strokers&#8221;? That sounds bad. Anyways, today marks the official release of the first single &#8220;Under Cover of Darkness&#8221;. Available for free download on their site for the next 48 hours or so, though I&#8217;d recommend just checking it out on Youtube, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The moment has finally come for <i>Strokes</i> fans, what do you call <i>Strokes</i> fans? &#8220;Strokers&#8221;? That sounds bad. Anyways, today marks the official release of the first single &#8220;Under Cover of Darkness&#8221;. Available for free download on their site for the next 48 hours or so, though I&#8217;d recommend just checking it out on Youtube, unless you want to sign up for a <i>Strokes&#8217;</i> newsletter. To save you some time I&#8217;ll post this video of the new single right here, easy breezy beautiful.</p>
<p>As for the song itself, I like it. Bright and cheery like &#8220;Someday&#8221;, but still retaining some of the complexity of <i>First Impressions of Earth</i>, which could either be a good or bad sign. The interplay between guitarists Nick Valensi and Albert Hammond Jr. is definitely stands out, showcasing a kind of classic rock feel. Word on the street is that the new album <i>Angles</i> (Due out March 22) is supposed to be a return to the sounds of <i>Is This It?</i> Hard to say if <i>The Strokes</i> can ever capture that kind of lightning again, but this track is a good start. </p>
<p><iframe title="YouTube video player" width="440" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/OwxcQvB_vcQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=843</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How I Met All Women Who Aren&#8217;t Your Mother</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=842</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=842#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 08:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How I Met Your Mother &#8211; &#8220;Oh, Honey&#8221; One of the best features of How I Met Your Mother is how it plays with narrative structure. Since the story is told by Ted of the increasingly-less-distant future, episodes can have him misremember events and prevent stories non-linearly. I feel like the show has played with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><i>How I Met Your Mother</i> &#8211; &#8220;Oh, Honey&#8221;</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TVJOzeuikGI/AAAAAAAAA-k/OD35O4Nrx5s/s1600/Oh_Honey_promo.jpg"><img border="0" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TVJOzeuikGI/AAAAAAAAA-k/OD35O4Nrx5s/s1600/Oh_Honey_promo.jpg" width="430" /></a></div>
<p>One of the best features of <i>How I Met Your Mother</i> is how it plays with narrative structure. Since the story is told by Ted of the increasingly-less-distant future, episodes can have him misremember events and prevent stories non-linearly. I feel like the show has played with this element more than usual this season, resulting in some pretty strong episodes. &#8220;Oh, Honey&#8221; is certainly among those in that it was a quality episode, but I have to say I&#8217;m really disappointed by the direction the story turned last night.</p>
<p>OK, yes, it was pretty telegraphed that Zoey and Ted would try to have some kind of relationship. And since Future Ted calls her Zoey, and not Your Mother, we know that she is not the woman Ted is going to end up with. So, in a season that set itself up as the season we&#8217;d finally meet mother, we are instead going to be sidetracked at least the rest of the way this year. I guess I shouldn&#8217;t have been surprised, even if they were going to introduce mother, it would probably be in the season finale.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s just, well, they said the story is being told in 2030. And those kids look pretty old. I&#8217;d say the daughter is probably around 18. So she has to be born next year. Just because the show is called <i>How I Met Your Mother </i>doesn&#8217;t mean it has to end when Ted meets mother. I mean you can&#8217;t really make the argument that every single episode has built toward Ted meeting mother anymore, the show probably should have been called <i>How Every Relationship I&#8217;ve Had in My Life Turned Out </i>at this point.</p>
<p>But anyway, I guess the main attraction for &#8220;Oh, Honey&#8221; wasn&#8217;t even the Ted/Zoey story, but Katy Perry. She&#8217;s the eponymous Honey, a sexual interest of Barney&#8217;s that results in a funny breakdown over the phrase &#8220;who&#8217;s your daddy.&#8221; Katy Perry did fine with the material she had and I guess we shouldn&#8217;t be surprised someone like her popped up on the show, after all Britney Spears was on for a few episodes not so long ago.</p>
<p>But the biggest laughs came from Marshall and his family. Marshall&#8217;s still in Minnesota since his father died, although Lily&#8217;s gone back to NY, presumably because she still has a job as a teacher, although I can&#8217;t remember the last time we saw that. And Robin&#8217;s in the episode too, sitting around doing nothing. But I digress, as Marshall&#8217;s &#8220;Ted, that son of a bitch&#8221; was definitely the biggest laugh of the night for me. I also enjoyed his brother, listening in on the call and offering a poetic analysis of the Ted/Zoey situation, that immediately segueing into childish jokes.</p>
<p>So, yeah, a good episode. It will be interesting to see where <i>HIMYM </i>goes from here. Bummer that The Captain probably won&#8217;t be a part of that future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=842</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>106</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>C.A.T.: Giant Steps</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=841</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=841#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 06:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Coltrane &#8211; Giant Steps (1960) This&#8217;ll probably be the last jazz album I&#8217;ll do as we head into that wonderful decade of music that was the sixties. &#160;When I was first getting in to jazz in high school this was probably the album that really hooked me in like no other, and it&#8217;s still [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">John Coltrane &#8211; <i>Giant Steps </i>(1960)</span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TVI6_--YmHI/AAAAAAAAA-c/zpi9rlpbcK4/s1600/giant+steps.bmp" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="196" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TVI6_--YmHI/AAAAAAAAA-c/zpi9rlpbcK4/s200/giant+steps.bmp" width="200" /></a></div>
<p>This&#8217;ll probably be the last jazz album I&#8217;ll do as we head into that wonderful decade of music that was the sixties. &nbsp;When I was first getting in to jazz in high school this was probably the album that really hooked me in like no other, and it&#8217;s still one of those few jazz albums that I find to be pretty much flawless song for song.</p>
<p>This wasn&#8217;t Coltrane&#8217;s first album as band leader, but it was the one that really established him as his own musical force after parting with Miles Davis&#8217;s band after taking part in 1959&#8242;s <i>Kind Of Blue</i>. &nbsp;You can really hear &#8216;Trane taking full stock in his &#8220;sheets of sound&#8221; style, while the rest of the band has no problem keeping up with his furious playing. &nbsp;<i>Giant Steps</i> also saw Coltrane breaking out as a composer, as it&#8217;s the first album in which he composed every track, and the melodic quality of the songs are about as good as any Coltrane I&#8217;ve heard.</p>
<p>I guess what I always loved about the album is the way it basically just goes for broke with each song. &nbsp;From the opening chords of the album&#8217;s title track, it&#8217;s pretty much nothing but really fast, really frantic playing, but the musicians on hand are more than game for it. &nbsp;And luckily the album slows down a bit for the more laid-back &#8220;Naima&#8221;, one of Coltrane&#8217;s more notable ballads.</p>
<p>Basically, if you want to figure out whether you like jazz or not, I&#8217;d probably say this would be as good as any album to try on for size. &nbsp;It&#8217;s also an example of how Coltrane didn&#8217;t really subscribe to the idea that jazz was about &#8220;the notes you don&#8217;t play&#8221;, as he always seemed bent on putting every little idea he could into each one of his solos.</p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;Giant Steps&#8221;, &#8220;Naima&#8221;, &#8220;Mr. P. C.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=841</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Easy Like Sunday Morning</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=840</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=840#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 03:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I missed the chance last year, but the year before that I did a fairly extensive Super Bowl recap here on the DaMorgue. I&#8217;m not going to do that, but I see no harm in expressing a few thoughts regarding this annual sports phenomenon that is the Superbowl. First off I guess, there&#8217;s the teams [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TU-yWnOZD4I/AAAAAAAAB7c/94i0T2ZH_m0/s1600/2011-Super-Bowl-Packers-Steelers-012311L.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 206px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TU-yWnOZD4I/AAAAAAAAB7c/94i0T2ZH_m0/s320/2011-Super-Bowl-Packers-Steelers-012311L.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5570867365636804482" /></a><br />I missed the chance last year, but the year before that I did a fairly extensive Super Bowl recap here on the DaMorgue. I&#8217;m not going to do that, but I see no harm in expressing a few thoughts regarding this annual sports phenomenon that is the Superbowl. </p>
<p>First off I guess, there&#8217;s the teams the Steelers and the Packers. Nothing really that compelling about that matchup, just two good teams. Naturally I leaned towards the Packers, I mean the Steelers have enough Superbowl titles and does anybody really like Big Bad Ben Roethlisberger? Whatever, I didn&#8217;t care much about the outcome, all I ever ask for is that it&#8217;s a good game and it was fine. My favorite part was that terrible Steelers missed field goal from like 53 yards away, ha, ha, I bet that guy was pretty bummed. </p>
<p>Suppose I&#8217;ll address that halftime show next. First one to feature a modern group since nipplegate so I expected it to suck. So it did suck, I mean shouldn&#8217;t real music come from ya know, people that are good musicians? I feel like the <i>Black Eyed Peas</i> might as well of been doing karaoke. It doesn&#8217;t help that none of them are really that talented of singers, or anything for that matter. They didn&#8217;t even have enough of their own songs to fill up the performance (insert Slash) for a subpar tribute to GnR. </p>
<p>What I was surprised to hear is that almost EVERYONE agreed this year&#8217;s halftime show really sucked, feels good to be a part of that consensus. I understand halftime organizers were tired of using comatose rock geezers for their show, but at least those comatose rock geezers know how to sing and usually have good songs, something to keep in mind for next year.</p>
<p>Commercials… Another popular aspect of Superbowl mania, but one that rarely catches my interest. I mean I usually like the new movie trailers, definitely excited to get a look at <i>Captain America</i> (Which appears to be utilizing a little Benjamin Button technology) but most of the commercials just seem to try too hard. Cramming in superstars like Justin Bieber and Kenny G. can only take you so far, can&#8217;t think of a single standout commercial. Definitely a lot of violent slapstick stuff, meaning lots of ads where people get hurt in the head and or nuts. I was surprised to see a lack of off-the-wall beer commercials, those guys usually bring their A-game but I don&#8217;t know, maybe they were all drunk or something.</p>
<p>Despite all my cantankerous bickering I like watching the Superbowl. It&#8217;s a great opportunity to just to kick back with some salty snacks and watch some good ol&#8217; football. Basically it&#8217;s just an excuse to hang out, be lazy and in the words of Spicoli &#8220;Hey bud, let&#8217;s party!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=840</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Watch It on Your Thing Carlos Thought Of</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=839</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=839#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 06:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[30 Rock &#8211; &#8220;¡Qué Sorpresa!&#8221; Is it weird that comedy TV has turned me into a Brian Williams fan? Every time B Dubs shows up on The Daily Show or 30 Rock, he makes me laugh. I know very little of his actual work. This week he showed up as a gossip once again, but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><i>30 Rock</i> &#8211; &#8220;¡Qué Sorpresa!&#8221;</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><img border="0" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TUzmNw4BI2I/AAAAAAAAA-c/dU0FMTEBHwc/s640/30+Rock+Que+Sorpresa+NBC.jpg" width="430" /></div>
<p>Is it weird that comedy TV has turned me into a Brian Williams fan? Every time B Dubs shows up on <i>The Daily Show </i>or <i>30 Rock</i>, he makes me laugh. I know very little of his actual work. This week he showed up as a gossip once again, but what really got me was at the very end of the episode, with he pitch about some sort of lizard men TV show, starring him. That a scene like that exists in the first place is exactly why I am such a fan of <i>30 Rock</i>.</p>
<p>As usual, there are a lot of threads to follow, but the main one involves Jack enlisting Liz to go shopping with Avery. They get spotted by one of Avery&#8217;s coworkers, so Liz has to pretend she&#8217;s the pregnant one. Since no one in the office can be trusted, Liz has to perpetuate the story, going as far a having a demeaning pregnant lady photo shoot. This is all because Jack&#8217;s meeting with his new Kabletown boss and is worried about his future with NBC.&nbsp;Fortunately, with the help of the elderly Kenneth, Jack proves himself and regains job security. Also, Tracy and Jenna celebrate that they are friends now, then get into an argument over a sweater.</p>
<p>I wonder how long Elizabeth Banks will stick around? She was only in one scene this week, despite being a big deal movie star. It&#8217;s weird having a show were the two main characters are involved with celebrities that obviously can&#8217;t be on the show that often. But I guess Elizabeth Banks did stick around on <i>Scrubs </i>for a while, and this is the same channel and was the same time slot as <i>Scrubs</i>&#8230;</p>
<p>I liked this episode, but in the end not much of it was really too memorable for me. Liz&#8217;s photo shoot was pretty funny. Jack&#8217;s plot has a couple good moments. Maybe it&#8217;s because the show isn&#8217;t on until 10 and I&#8217;m just overloaded with TV comedy by the time I get to <i>30 Rock</i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=839</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Long Live Zorp</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=838</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=838#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 05:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Parks and Recreation&#160;-&#160;&#8220;Time Capsule&#8221; Man I love me some Parks and Recreation. The show has one of the best ensembles of characters on TV right now and it handles them so well. While it&#8217;s been hard to say goodbye to Mark and it&#8217;s been a little weird that Leslie has been acting like she&#8217;s the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><i>Parks and Recreation</i></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">&nbsp;-&nbsp;</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">&#8220;Time Capsule&#8221;</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><img border="0" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TUzhTDN8XeI/AAAAAAAAA-Y/mD_C8XIVpi4/s320/time-capsule.jpg" width="430" /></div>
<p>Man I love me some <i>Parks and Recreation</i>. The show has one of the best ensembles of characters on TV right now and it handles them so well. While it&#8217;s been hard to say goodbye to Mark and it&#8217;s been a little weird that Leslie has been acting like she&#8217;s the boss, it all makes sense if you&#8217;re used to the characters. I think even the seemingly one-beat characters Chris and Ben are coming into their own in a fun way.</p>
<p>So the Parks Department, despite supposedly being in Harvest Festival mode, found time to put together a time capsule. They&#8217;re filling it with important objects, such as every motto the city has had, recited from memory by Leslie, when Kelly (Will Forte) shows up and demands a spot for <i>Twilight </i>inside. When it&#8217;s clear he won&#8217;t get his way, Kelly handcuffs himself in Leslie and Tom&#8217;s office. Tom, having broken up with Lucy, is seduced by the power of <i>Twilight </i>and soon Leslie is trapped in a hellish world of <i>Twilight </i>gossip. So she gives in to Kelly&#8217;s demands. This opens the floodgates for the rest of the town&#8217;s crazies, eventually leading to a hilarious meeting in which it becomes clear the town will need more than one capsule.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, Andy is still trying to win April over, and Chris decides to help him. This leads to Andy befriending Eduardo, which ruins that relationship for April. You know, I thought Eduardo was all right, it&#8217;s sad to see him go so soon, but I guess it&#8217;s good in the grand scheme of things, we don&#8217;t necessarily need a whole season of more unrequited love between Andy and April.</p>
<p>Yep, another great episode from a great show. In fact, <i>Parks and Rec </i>probably generated my biggest laugh of the night, when Ron talked about his favorite thing to order at his favorite restaurant: &#8220;The Four Horse-Meals of the Meat-Pork-Alypse.&#8221; Now we just need to get that stupid couples show out of the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=838</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michael in the City</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=837</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=837#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 05:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Office&#160;-&#160;&#8220;The Search&#8221;&#160; The thing that bothers me most about The Office is that I&#8217;ve rather enjoyed it these past few episodes. It&#8217;s not really the same show it was in the beginning, not nearly that good. But after a lengthly lackluster streak, I&#8217;ve been having a good time with what the show has done [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><i>The Office</i></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">&nbsp;-&nbsp;</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">&#8220;The Search&#8221;&nbsp;</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><img border="0" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TUzdm5fu49I/AAAAAAAAA-U/zLNwFndJhhM/s320/thesearch.jpg.jpg" width="430" /></div>
<p>The thing that bothers me most about <i>The Office </i>is that I&#8217;ve rather enjoyed it these past few episodes. It&#8217;s not really the same show it was in the beginning, not nearly that good. But after a lengthly lackluster streak, I&#8217;ve been having a good time with what the show has done lately. Maybe that&#8217;s because there&#8217;s been a noticeable effort to push Jim and Pam to the side to focus on the funnier characters, namely Andy and Daryl. Whatever it is, it&#8217;s working, and I&#8217;m learning to accept the reality that we&#8217;ll have a version of the show soon without Michael.</p>
<p>Speaking of Michael, this episode sees him abandoned by Jim downtown. Without a wallet or cell phone, Michael quickly gives in to life on the streets, begging and stealing just to stay alive. The office dispatches Holly, Erin and Dwight to find their missing leader. This allowed for some good character development for the two women, as Erin finally begins to understand why Michael loves Holly so much and we get to see just how alike Holly and Michael are. Dwight&#8217;s just there to be silly. In the end, Holly finds Michael and the two kiss. Looks like we&#8217;ll be able to wrap up Michael&#8217;s story very neatly, I get the impression Steve Carell is not going to be coming back to this show.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, back at the actual office, a cartoon of Pam&#8217;s has sparked a caption contest, one that Gabe is not a fan of. Gabe, being a company man, can&#8217;t allow the rest of the office to make jokes at Sabre&#8217;s expense. So they start making really mean jokes about Gabe. I feel bad for Gabe, the show has gone out of its way to turn him into kind of a Toby, but for everyone in the office to hate instead of just Michael. This subplot wasn&#8217;t really doing it for me, but it was fine I guess. I would have preferred more of Michael being a moron in the city, though.</p>
<p>So, there you a go. Another solid episode from <i>The Office</i>. Of course nothing can top the amazing cold open with David Brent last weekend, but I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s meant to be topped. I&#8217;m just happy that I can enjoy this show while it&#8217;s still on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=837</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Role-Playing Community</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=836</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=836#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 05:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I&#8217;m gonna start reviewing TV episodes, since, well, why not? I usually do seasonal wrap-ups, but why not just talk about the show as it goes on? I&#8217;ll do the best I can to post every week, and who knows, maybe the rest of the team can get in on this too. Community&#160;- &#8220;Advanced [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I&#8217;m gonna start reviewing TV episodes, since, well, why not? I usually do seasonal wrap-ups, but why not just talk about the show as it goes on? I&#8217;ll do the best I can to post every week, and who knows, maybe the rest of the team can get in on this too.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><i>Community</i>&nbsp;- &#8220;Advanced Dungeons &amp; Dragons&#8221;</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><img border="0" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TUzXRQH8nfI/AAAAAAAAA-M/alORLckP-GI/s400/Senor+Ben+Chang+Community.jpg" width="430" /></div>
<p><i>Community </i>continues to prove itself as one of the best comedies on TV this season with last night&#8217;s baffling &#8220;Advanced Dungeons &amp; Dragons.&#8221; An episode full of enough laughs for everyone to shine, and some heart too. And I don&#8217;t just mean the cast, the music and sound design this week was great and the episode was shot and edited in a way that made it seem much more epic that usual, despite us spending our time with the familiar cast in their most common setting.</p>
<p>So there&#8217;s this guy, Neil, who everyone calls Fat Neil. Jeff notices this, and feigns interest in DnD to buddy up with Fat Neil, since he feels bad for the guy. When it seems like Fat Neil might be suicidal, Jeff enlists the help of the study group to play a game with the poor lad, in the hopes of cheering him up. They leave out the insensitive Pierce, whose feelings are hurt when he finds the group. Pierce decides to sabotage the game and is especially mean to Fat Neil. With possibly the young man&#8217;s real life on the line, the group must work together to stop Pierce.</p>
<p>With a set up like that, I expected we&#8217;d be teleported to a fantasy world, where we could laugh at our heroes in silly costumes as they sarcastically deal with DnD tropes. Kind of like the Christmas special. But <i>Community </i>is smarter than that. DnD is a game that takes place entirely in your mind, and that&#8217;s the way the show handled it, with the cast sitting around the table the only visual for most of the episode. This was a brave approach, but it really paid off, giving us classic moments like the hilarious sex scene between Hector The Well-Endowed and the elf maiden. Plus you can&#8217;t beat the sight gag of Chang painted black with white hair.</p>
<p>I feel bad for Shirley, she didn&#8217;t get anything to do this week. But the rest of the cast got some great laughs and I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if some people thought this was the best episode of the series so far. I&#8217;m not one of those people, but &#8220;Advanced Dungeons &amp; Dragons&#8221; could still probably be top ten.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=836</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2011 Tuneage</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=835</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=835#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 23:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hasn&#8217;t been a post in awhile, I&#8217;ve been damn busy as I assume that&#8217;s been the case for most of us at DaMorgue. I don&#8217;t even know if there&#8217;s anything that&#8217;s been going on worth mentioning, unless you want to hear us tackle the issues in Egypt. In the past we&#8217;ve done a whole slew [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TUytCJIs5GI/AAAAAAAAB7U/iQn0NfEhZWc/s1600/VivoScene-Strokes2011.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 213px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TUytCJIs5GI/AAAAAAAAB7U/iQn0NfEhZWc/s320/VivoScene-Strokes2011.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5570017091474220130" /></a><br />Hasn&#8217;t been a post in awhile, I&#8217;ve been damn busy as I assume that&#8217;s been the case for most of us at DaMorgue. I don&#8217;t even know if there&#8217;s anything that&#8217;s been going on worth mentioning, unless you want to hear us tackle the issues in Egypt.</p>
<p>In the past we&#8217;ve done a whole slew of &#8220;upcoming album&#8221; posts, so here&#8217;s one more to add to the list. Basically albums I&#8217;m keeping an ear out for, I&#8217;m off to a good start this year and this spring only looks to further that satisfaction. </p>
<p><b>Feb 15 &#8211; Bright Eyes &#8211; The People&#8217;s Key</b><br />: My liking for <i>Bright Eyes</i> has been casual in the past, but I&#8217;ve definitely been getting into them a lot more lately. Maybe hearing about a new album made me think, &#8220;Hmm maybe it&#8217;s finally a good time to check all this out.&#8221; Not to mention Nancy proposed the idea of going to see them in Portland in April, I&#8217;d be all about that. </p>
<p><b>Feb 28 &#8211; Beady Eye &#8211; Different Gear, Still Speeding</b><br />&#8220;Who the hell <i>Beady Eye</i>?&#8221;  You probably wouldn&#8217;t care if I told you, unless you like <i>Oasis</i>. Yes this is it, the now Noel Gallagher-less <i>Oasis</i> and this is their much hyped (By Liam Gallagher) debut album. A handful of songs have surfaced and the sound is still pretty reminiscent of <i>Oasis</i>, but a little more basic and straightforward. I don&#8217;t imagine it will make much of a blip as it&#8217;s just not the same without Noel, I just care because I&#8217;m such a huge <i>Oasis</i> fan. I hope for the best, but don&#8217;t expect much. </p>
<p><b>March 7 &#8211; R.E.M. &#8211; Collapse Into Now</b><br />: I keep putting off listening to <i>Accelerate</i> for reasons seemingly unknown. I like <i>REM</i> to some extent and reviews were favorable, including Colin&#8217;s post here on DaMorgue. So this time &#8217;round I&#8217;m going to try and be on the ball and pay some attention to these still standing statesman of alternative rock. </p>
<p><b>March 22 &#8211; The Strokes &#8211; Angles</b><br />: If there is one album I&#8217;m just so unbelievably stoked for, it&#8217;s this one. The much anticipated, long awaited, return of one of the best modern rock groups <i>The Strokes</i> is something I wouldn&#8217;t miss for the world. Word from the band is it&#8217;s supposedly their best album since <i>Is This It?</i> and will be a return to that sound. Seeing that <i>Is This It?</i> was my second favorite album of the 2000s and Colin&#8217;s favorite, that&#8217;s damn good news. The first single &#8220;Undercover of Darkness&#8221; is supposed to hit airwaves on February 9th, but I&#8217;m hoping it leaks, I don&#8217;t know how much longer I can wait. </p>
<p><b>May 3 &#8211; Fleet Foxes &#8211; Helplessness Blues</b><br />: I wasn&#8217;t as diehard as some people were for the last <i>Fleet Foxes</i> album, but it did have a folksy kind of beauty that was hard not to like. The band says this one will be less poppy and more groove based, so we can find out this may what lies ahead for this hometown Seattle group. </p>
<p><b>March-ish<br />Peter Bjorn and John &#8211; Gimme Some</b><br />Man these guys just never stop,it  seems like they always have an album out. Not much is known about Gimme Some, but from the two songs released, it sounds like a back-to-basics album for this Swedish trio. Winning people&#8217;s hearts with the instant indie classic &#8220;Young Folks&#8221; off of 2006&#8242;s <i>Writer&#8217;s Block</i>, <i>PB&#038;J</i> have done a lot of experimenting since than, most notably on 2009&#8242;s <i>Living Thing</i>, an album that controversially split myself and Sean, I liked it. I posted a neat ADD fueled video below of this new song barely passing 90 seconds, intense. </p>
<p><b>TBA<br />Death Cab for Cutie &#8211; Codes and Keys</b><br />No release date yet, but it&#8217;s supposedly coming out this Spring. It&#8217;s been quoted as &#8220;a much less guitar-centric album&#8221; so we&#8217;ll see if that means electronic, or keys or what, either way I have faith in these Indie Pop Poobahs. </p>
<p>There&#8217;s a lot of other rumors flying around, but I&#8217;ll wait till I get some more concrete info to report on that. As for 2011, it looks to be a fairly exciting year for music, I am winner! Here&#8217;s that <i>PB&#038;J</i> video I was talking about too, pumped for that album.</p>
<p><iframe title="YouTube video player" width="440" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/wG5nEcnDU38" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=835</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>C.A.T: Time Out</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=834</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=834#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 08:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Dave Brubeck Quartet- Time Out (1959) My knowledge and or interest in jazz may not expand past a few albums, but I have a lot of respect for the genre. I wish I could hit you up with a more obscure jazz record, as opposed to such a popular one, but it&#8217;s all I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">The Dave Brubeck Quartet- <i>Time Out (1959)</i></span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TUfEYD1bZII/AAAAAAAAB7I/xrMjJzU6iqY/s1600/Time_out_album_cover.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 200px; height: 199px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TUfEYD1bZII/AAAAAAAAB7I/xrMjJzU6iqY/s200/Time_out_album_cover.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5568635381892211842" /></a>My knowledge and or interest in jazz may not expand past a few albums, but I have a lot of respect for the genre. I wish I could hit you up with a more obscure jazz record, as opposed to such a popular one, but it&#8217;s all I know. I also find it amusing that one of the jazz albums I have is by a white guy, but it&#8217;s all about how you play right? </p>
<p>Led by accomplished jazz pianist Dave Brubeck, <i>The Dave Brubeck Quartet</i> consisted of; Paul Desmond on alto sax, Joe Morello on drums, Eugene Wright on double bass and Dave himself on the keys. Together they swung the 50s jazz scene in San Fran with their unique time signatures and silky smoothness. While Dave holds together the tight ensemble with a rhythmic playing style that just exudes coolness.</p>
<p>Naturally I was drawn to Dave Brubeck through the classic number &#8220;Take Five.&#8221; If I was only allowed to listen to one jazz song for the rest of my life, it would  have to be this undeniably slick classic. The way Morello comes in with those cymbals so big as they echo through the sound space. You have that catchy sax line, tight bass, and that never-ending piano bit that you can&#8217;t help but get addicted to, like heroin. Get it because a lot of jazz musicians were junkies? But I think Brubeck was clean, what were we talking about?</p>
<p>Though it&#8217;s the unusual structures of these songs that really makes this material stand out. You got 9/8, 5/4, waltz stuff. double-waltz time, that doesn&#8217;t mean anything to me, but I bet guys back then were like &#8220;Woah you can&#8217;t do that, your crazy man!&#8221; Maybe that&#8217;s why critics back in 59&#8242; received it so unfavorably, now it&#8217;s a classic. </p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;Blue Rondo à la Turk&#8221;, &#8220;Three to Get Ready&#8221;, &#8220;Take Five&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=834</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oscar Shmoscar: Surprises and Snubs</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=833</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=833#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 23:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even though not much surprised me with the Oscar announcements this morning, I still feel it&#8217;s my duty to address the matter, considering how often we talk about movies here anyways. So where to begin exactly? Well let&#8217;s begin with the things that surprised me. Javier Bardem for Biutiful, the latest from Mexican writer/director Alejandro [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TT9fEUmTrAI/AAAAAAAAB7A/Bmx2W3p-eNE/s1600/83rd_Academy_Awards_poster.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 240px; height: 320px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TT9fEUmTrAI/AAAAAAAAB7A/Bmx2W3p-eNE/s320/83rd_Academy_Awards_poster.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5566272192306719746" /></a>Even though not much surprised me with the Oscar announcements this morning, I still feel it&#8217;s my duty to address the matter, considering how often we talk about movies here anyways. So where to begin exactly? Well let&#8217;s begin with the things that surprised me.</p>
<p>Javier Bardem for <i>Biutiful</i>, the latest from Mexican writer/director Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu. Also nominated in the Best Foreign Film category, this one came out of left field. Although <i>Bituiful</i> may have a had a great performance from Bardem and I bet it does, it&#8217;s interesting as the film itself really hasn&#8217;t been that raved about, I don&#8217;t even know how I could of seen it. </p>
<p>Next might be a good time for me to express my opinion about the other Best Actor nominees. Now I liked <i>The Social Network</i> as much as the next guy, but I still find it strange to see Jesse Eisenberg continually nominated for best actor. He was good, but never when watching him did I ever think &#8220;He deserves an oscar.&#8221; Of course he wont win, but I find it peculiar how all the critics seem to get set in their ways and all come to the same consensus. Personally I would of liked to see Robert Duvall get nominated for <i>Get Low</i>, one of his most powerful and moving performances in years, but that was probably never gonna happen. </p>
<p>John Hawkes in the best supporting actor category is definitely a pleasant surprise. I&#8217;m a fan of his work and I always enjoy seeing some of the lesser names get some recognition. Though it would seem the category is more or less a lock for Christian Bale, but still it&#8217;s fun to see. If it were up to me I&#8217;d give that shiny golden statue to Geoffrey Rush come Oscar night, but seeing that he&#8217;s already got an Oscar it&#8217;s unlikely, Oscars man, it&#8217;s all politics. </p>
<p>In the case of snubs, I think there&#8217;s one in particular that&#8217;s creating a frenzy and that&#8217;s the absence of Christopher Nolan for Best Director. As far as I&#8217;m concerned <i>Inception</i> was one of the best films of the year. It was a stunning exploration of the mind that came solely from Nolan&#8217;s own noggin, so he gets the royal screw job. It wouldn&#8217;t sting so bad if he hadn&#8217;t already been snubbed for <i>The Dark Knight</i> in 08&#8242;. I mean do the Coens really need another nomination? Come on, let&#8217;s mix it up! And David O. Russell? <i>The Fighter</i> was good, but it&#8217;s easily the weakest movie considering the amount of nominations it has. If it wasn&#8217;t for Christian Bale, Amy Adams, and Melissa Leo I wonder if anyone would of even given a shit?</p>
<p><i>The Town</i> is another film that I believe should of taken the place of <i>The Fighter</i>, in this case for the Best Picture category. It was one of the most critically acclaimed films of the fall and all it has is a single nomination for Jeremy Renner. I swear it&#8217;s like all these award shows make a pact about what movies to include and not include. It&#8217;s a real shame how uninventive and unfortunately predictable the nominations were this year, but I shouldn&#8217;t take it out on the movies most of them were gold!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=833</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>C.A.T.: Milestones</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=832</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=832#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 09:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Miles Davis &#8211; Milestones (1958) The late &#8217;50s to early &#8217;60s wasn&#8217;t really a time in which the album had really taken hold as a huge force in rock n&#8217; roll, and everything seemed to more based around singles. &#160;I know jazz hasn&#8217;t really been represented on this blog at all, but I figured it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Miles Davis &#8211; <i>Milestones </i>(1958)</span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TT6ZE5ccX5I/AAAAAAAAA-U/X_QCSv9jFq8/s1600/milestones.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TT6ZE5ccX5I/AAAAAAAAA-U/X_QCSv9jFq8/s200/milestones.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<p>The late &#8217;50s to early &#8217;60s wasn&#8217;t really a time in which the album had really taken hold as a huge force in rock n&#8217; roll, and everything seemed to more based around singles. &nbsp;I know jazz hasn&#8217;t really been represented on this blog at all, but I figured it was about time considering I&#8217;ve always been somewhat of a fan of the genre, but by no means a jazz expert or anything.</p>
<p><i>Milestones</i> has pretty much always lived in the shadow of Miles&#8217; next album, the landmark <i>Kind Of Blue</i>, and for good reason. &nbsp;However, <i>Milestones</i> is nonetheless a pretty amazing set of songs, as it sees Miles in a way reaching the pinnacle of his frantic &#8217;50s hard bop style, while pointing the way to the kind of etherial sound he&#8217;d explore on <i>Kind Of Blue</i>. &nbsp;The album&#8217;s title track even sees Miles exploring the kind of modal-based compositions that would define <i>Kind Of Blue</i>&nbsp;as well as a lot of jazz in general that would come out of the early &#8217;60s.</p>
<p>A big part of any great jazz album is without a doubt the instrumentation, and <i>Milestones</i> is another example of Miles&#8217; ability to bring together the best musicians around and bring out the best in them. &nbsp;Coltrane, Cannonball, Garland, Chambers, and Philly Joe Jones are all pretty much flawless, and you&#8217;d expect nothing less than phenomenal playing from a group like that. &nbsp;And for anyone that&#8217;s ever said Miles Davis was a great conceptualist but not a great trumpet player, just check out &#8220;Dr. Jekyll&#8221;, in which the dude effectively blows his ass off.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re not really familiar with jazz or the music of Miles Davis, this might not be quite as good a place to start as <i>Kind Of Blue</i>, but it&#8217;s definitely at that same level. &nbsp;Either way, it ranks among my favorite Miles albums, and it captures him in one of the most adventurous and creative periods of his unprecedented career.</p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;Two Bass Hit&#8221;, &#8220;Milestones&#8221;, &#8220;Straight, No Chaser&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=832</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Long Live the King</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=831</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=831#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 23:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Decemberists &#8211; The King is Dead Last September, myself and fellow Damorgue blogger Nancy Tin-Tin went to Bumbershoot. There we had the pleasure of seeing indie folk rockers The Decemeberists. Not only that but we got to hear three new cuts off of their then unreleased album before anyone else. This was also where [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">The Decemberists &#8211; <i>The King is Dead</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TTdzJk0UPJI/AAAAAAAAB64/b6rRBCGFBmE/s1600/The_Decemberists_-_The_King_Is_Dead.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 200px; height: 200px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TTdzJk0UPJI/AAAAAAAAB64/b6rRBCGFBmE/s200/The_Decemberists_-_The_King_Is_Dead.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5564042472978660498" /></a>Last September, myself and fellow Damorgue blogger Nancy Tin-Tin went to Bumbershoot. There we had the pleasure of seeing indie folk rockers <i>The Decemeberists</i>. Not only that but we got to hear three new cuts off of their then unreleased album before anyone else. This was also where frontman Colin Meloy announced the new album, what a way to hear about it huh? That&#8217;ll always stick with me, but hey, now we got that album to focus on. </p>
<p>&#8220;Folk Rock&#8221; I suppose is the best way you could sum up this mixed bag of multi-instrumentalists, though I&#8217;m not sure where the accordion fits into all of this. The results are both a very American and rootsy sound, complete with bright acoustics and soulful vocals. Known in the past for their lengthy concept albums, <i>The King is Dead</i> is much more basic in it&#8217;s approach and overall sound. It&#8217;s also the group&#8217;s shortest album at 40 something minutes and although it&#8217;s a bit lacking in ingenuity, the overall feel is one of enthusiasm and joy. At least that&#8217;s how I feel, hard to read that Colin Meloy, he&#8217;s so deep. </p>
<p>Thus far critics have compared this new work to something Bruce Springsteen might cook up, which I guess can understand. Another recurring comparison has been to <i>R.E.M</i> with songs like &#8220;Down By the Water&#8221; which is funny because who else is featured on the track but <i>R.E.M</i> guitarist Peter Buck, also featured on two other tracks. Of course <i>The Decemeberists</i> don&#8217;t need much assistance when it comes to additional musicians, they themselves are already proficient multi-instrumentalists and musicians in general. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve always felt that Colin Meloy is like the folk rock answer to Ben Gibbard, or maybe you could say he&#8217;s Oregon&#8217;s answer to Washington&#8217;s favorite Indie songwriter. Both posses a gentle, almost angelic singing voice and are both talented wordsmiths. Though I&#8217;ll always be a bigger <i>Death Cab</i> fan, <i>The Decemeberists</i> will always be there when I feel like something earthier from our Northwest brothers down south.</p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;Calamity Song&#8221;, &#8220;Down By the Water&#8221;,  &#8220;Rox In the Box&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=831</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>C.A.T: The &quot;Chirping&quot; Crickets</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=830</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=830#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 03:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Crickets- The &#8220;Chirping&#8221; Crickets (1957) We had a good run with our regular &#8220;Classic Album Tuesday&#8221; segment spanning consecutive albums from 1976-2003, but I think there&#8217;s a point where you have to draw the line on how much time is needed for an album to become a classic, so we settled snugly in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">The Crickets- <i>The &#8220;Chirping&#8221; Crickets (1957)</i></span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TTZVgSa7cWI/AAAAAAAAB6w/GH6LAAoMNAo/s1600/album-the-chirping-crickets.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 200px; height: 199px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TTZVgSa7cWI/AAAAAAAAB6w/GH6LAAoMNAo/s200/album-the-chirping-crickets.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5563728402851787106" /></a>We had a good run with our regular &#8220;Classic Album Tuesday&#8221; segment spanning consecutive albums from 1976-2003, but I think there&#8217;s a point where you have to draw the line on how much time is needed for an album to become a classic, so we settled snugly in the mid 2000s. So now I&#8217;m turning back the clock to present to you my favorite album of the 50s, a decade yet to be represented by our CAT feature. </p>
<p>I can firmly say that Buddy Holly is my not only my favorite artist of the Rockabilly genre, but of the 1950s as well. With such a distinct geeky howl, janglin&#8217; geetar, and such prowess as a songwriter, he truly was an amazing figure in rock. Racking up such classics as; &#8220;Oh Boy&#8221;, &#8220;Not Fade Away&#8221;, &#8220;Maybe Baby&#8221;, &#8220;That&#8217;ll Be the Day&#8221;, &#8220;I&#8217;m Looking for Someone to Love&#8221;, &#8220;Everyday&#8221;, &#8220;Rave On&#8221;, &#8220;Words of Love&#8221; and &#8220;Peggy Sue&#8221; all within a mere 2 1/2 year span before his tragic death at the age of 22. </p>
<p>This album (one of only three released during his lifetime) is perhaps is most impressive work. Containing six of the songs   previously mentioned, this might as well be a greatest hits, cause they just a keep on coming. Now before I go any further I should probably address the fact that this is not a solo album. Here Holly works alongside drummer Jerry Allison, bassist Joe B. Maudlin and rhythm guitarist Niki Sullivan to form the slick quartet that is <i>The Crickets.</i> And these guys weren&#8217;t just a backup band, they wrote alongside Holly as well. There couldn&#8217;t of been many other bands during the 50s that that functioned that way, so in a way these guys were real trailblazers.</p>
<p>The songs present are all oozing with that 50s rockabilly charm that Holly very much helped popularize. The melodies are tight and simple and the backup vocals provided by an additional group of vocalists make for a delightfully charming listening experience. <i>The Beatles</i> were supposedly inspired greatly by this vocal approach and have always considered Holly a great influence. As a matter of fact I believe Paul McCartney still owns the Buddy Holly catalog. Hmm, anyways yeah, what an album what a legend.</p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;Oh Boy&#8221;, &#8220;Maybe Baby&#8221; &#8220;That&#8217;ll Be the Day&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=830</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rage in the Cage</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=829</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=829#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 08:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cage the Elephant &#8211; Thank You Happy Birthday And so it begins again. It&#8217;s only been a week since we posted our Favorite Albums of 2010 and here I am back to reviewing new albums and I never would of believed you if you told me the first would be by Cage the Elephant. For [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Cage the Elephant &#8211; <i>Thank You Happy Birthday</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TTP8E1uXhaI/AAAAAAAAB6o/MO-7-dqKVGQ/s1600/cage%2Bthe%2Belephant%2B-%2Bthank%2Byou%2Bhappy%2Bbirthday.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 200px; height: 200px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TTP8E1uXhaI/AAAAAAAAB6o/MO-7-dqKVGQ/s200/cage%2Bthe%2Belephant%2B-%2Bthank%2Byou%2Bhappy%2Bbirthday.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5563067124803929506" /></a>And so it begins again. It&#8217;s only been a week since we posted our <i>Favorite Albums of 2010</i> and here I am back to reviewing new albums and I never would of believed you if you told me the first would be by <i>Cage the Elephant</i>. </p>
<p>For starters, I was fairly familiar with such <i>Cage</i> songs as &#8220;In One Ear&#8221; and &#8220;Ain&#8217;t No Room for Wicked&#8221; from the radio and commercials. They kind of reminded me of a poor man&#8217;s Jack White, they had the style, but I wasn&#8217;t too big on the tunes. After this sophomore release I may have to reassess this group entirely. If you&#8217;d have randomly put on this new album without telling me, I never would of guessed it&#8217;s <i>Cage the Elephant</i>. The songs are far more primal, grungier, and well, just better.</p>
<p>Before this album I would of probably wrote <i>Cage</i> off as another run of the mill, one-two punch rock band, but this album is hardly run of the mill. It feeds off of angsty vocals, heavy riffs and <i>Pixies-like</i> melodies that will please indie and mainstream crowds alike. It&#8217;s a little bit punk, it&#8217;s a little bit pop and a step in the right direction for this still young band.</p>
<p>First of I have to address the song &#8220;Aberdeen&#8221;. I basically bought this album solely on the confidence of this song and as far as I&#8217;m concerned, it&#8217;s their best effort yet. A raw n&#8217; infectious rocker that just bares more than a striking resemblance to something the <i>Pixies</i> might do. Loud, quiet, loud, awesome! It&#8217;s simply a great song, easily my favorite on the entire album, but there&#8217;s lots for you to dig your sugary teeth into. &#8220;Shake Me Down&#8221; is a rather unconventional pop song that sounds as if it was sewn together from other songs. There&#8217;s no real chorus or verse structure and yet it feels just right. It&#8217;s another track that leans toward the more &#8220;pop&#8221; oriented songs on the album.</p>
<p>The punk moments of the album aren&#8217;t nearly as entertaining, but they feel at place with the loose playful structure of the whole experience. Man if this is the direction <i>Cage the Elephant</i> is going in now, I might just have to hitch a ride. </p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;Aberdeen&#8221;, &#8220;Around My Head&#8221;, &#8220;Shake Me Down&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=829</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sean&#8217;s Top Ten Movies of 2010</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=828</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=828#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 03:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Ten]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2010 felt like a disappointing year for movies, yet here I am with like 10 movies that I feel should be on this list but couldn&#8217;t make the cut. Yeah, I&#8217;m looking at you, The Kids are All Right. So quickly: Micmacs is neat, The Fighter is good, The Town is a lot of fun, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2010 felt like a disappointing year for movies, yet here I am with like 10 movies that I feel should be on this list but couldn&#8217;t make the cut. Yeah, I&#8217;m looking at you, <i>The Kids are All Right</i>. So quickly: <i>Micmacs </i>is neat, <i>The Fighter </i>is good, <i>The Town </i>is a lot of fun, <i>True Grit </i>is pretty impressive, <i>Greenberg </i>is interesting, <i>Kick-Ass </i>is funny (I&#8217;ve seen it three times!), <i>Scott Pilgrim </i>is cool, I guess, <i>How to Train Your Dragon </i>was surprisingly charming, <i>The A-Team </i>is a masterpiece. There. Glad I got that out. Also, I missed out on some movies that are probably really good. Specifically: <i>Animal Kingdom, Mother, Shutter Island</i>, <i>I am Love </i>and <i>Please Give.</i> Just didn&#8217;t have the time. Now that I&#8217;ve gotten through those massive lists, I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;re dying to see what my real list is; so let&#8217;s dig in.</p>
<p><img border="0" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TTJiI-HDkLI/AAAAAAAAA8s/P71bX2piU84/s400/screenshot_4_6385.jpg" width="430" /><br />
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">10. <i>Restrepo</i></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>What makes <i>Restrepo </i>a triumph is that it doesn&#8217;t politicize anything. And that would have been so easy to do: this is a documentary about the troops in the most dangerous part of Afghanistan, after all. But these soldiers don&#8217;t politicize it, they&#8217;re not out there saying they&#8217;re fighting because the liberals are too weak or anything like that. These are guys as old as me, and they remind me of the people I know. Except a lot braver. They are fighting because they swore to defend us. They are fighting because they want they&#8217;re buddies to live. After the recent passing of <i>Band of Brothers </i>hero Dick Winters, it&#8217;s comforting to know that while the times have changed, the caliber of the young men asked to defend us has not.</p>
<p><img border="0" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TTJif2tNUPI/AAAAAAAAA8w/LivYBzXZbp4/s400/black-swan-movie-best-movies-ever-natalie-portman-images.jpg" width="430" /><br /><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">9. <i>Black Swan</i></span><br />
<table>
<tbody> </tbody>
</table>
<p>The more I&#8217;ve come to think of the <i>Black Swan&#8217;s </i>screenplay, the more I&#8217;ve come to doubt the writing. So I hope it means something when I say that doesn&#8217;t matter. Future <i>Wolverine </i>sequel director Darren Aronofsky is such an expert with his camera and the performances are so strong that the film still triumphs as one of most intense, uncomfortable, trashy movies I&#8217;ve seen in recent memory. Oh man, that last ballet sequence at the end gives me chills.</p>
<p><img border="0" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TTJjQ3sFXsI/AAAAAAAAA80/Ftb2siH6Sq4/s400/winters_bone_2010_a_l_0.jpg" width="430" /><br />
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">8. <i>Winter&#8217;s Bone</i></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>The world of <i>Winter&#8217;s Bone</i> is so alien to me this might as well have been a sci fi movie. Kinda like <i>The Road </i>but better. This is a world where everyone seems to be related in some way, where gossip has enormous power, and no one is safe. It&#8217;s a complex and dark movie that I could see a lot of people really being turned off by, but I found it enthralling. I just really wanted that girl to get a better life.</p>
<p><img border="0" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TTJjqvPFAjI/AAAAAAAAA88/jvwObVhPYRI/s400/The-Kings-Speech-Filmonic.jpg" width="430" /><br />
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">7. <i>The King&#8217;s Speech</i></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>I had to really think about this one. Something about it just seemed cliche to me. Oh, the British monarchy period piece movie. Look at its all-star British cast! I didn&#8217;t want to succumb to those temptations, but here I am. At least I can say that my favorite part wasn&#8217;t British, but in fact Geoffrey Rush, who was great in the role and a real treat to see out of <i>Pirates of the Carribbean </i>makeup. You know what? This is a really good movie about a pretty crazy part of history I only knew a little bit about before.</p>
<p><img border="0" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TTJkDwL8e1I/AAAAAAAAA9E/V6Xk2D1Eot8/s400/127hours1.png" width="430" /><br />
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">6. <i>127 Hours</i></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>So, yeah, this is a movie about one dude stuck in a canyon for a long time. It is a movie which graphically shows said dude amputating his arm. None of that sounds appealing. But what makes it great is DB&#8217;s direction and JF&#8217;s performance. It becomes clear pretty quick that this is a story about more than survival, it is a story about perseverance and finding out <i>why </i>you want to survive. That&#8217;s pretty cool. Also, Sigur Rós.</p>
<p><img border="0" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TTJkXRtFgcI/AAAAAAAAA9M/OsLwEFGt0j4/s400/exit-gift-shop.jpg" width="430" /><br />
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">5. <i>Exit Through the Gift Shop</i></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Is this really an entry on my list, or a trick? In a year with a lot of disappointing comedies, it was even more surprising when one of the most amusing movies I saw was a &#8220;documentary.&#8221; Whether there&#8217;s any truth to this document doesn&#8217;t matter, because its story of a rebellious art form selling out and this unstable guy who was there to see it all is just so good. I really recommend you check this out, it&#8217;s on Netflix Instant streaming.</p>
<p><img border="0" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TTJkkJncpkI/AAAAAAAAA9U/HrpefQGzXnE/s400/UN-PROPHET-lg.jpg" width="430" /><br />
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">4. <i>A Prophet</i></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><i>A Prophet </i>is kinda like the French version of <i>The Wire</i>, but it&#8217;s a movie. Yeah, I can get behind that. It takes its time to get you into this world and these characters. The argument can probably be made that this makes the movie way too long and unfocused, but to me I felt like I knocked out a whole TV series over the course of one movie. There are some seriously crazy moments packed in here, making it among the best prison films I&#8217;ve ever seen. Plus, France is weird. The give you a day off of jail? What&#8217;s up with that? Also, Sigur Rós.</p>
<p><img border="0" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TTJldCKZSkI/AAAAAAAAA9c/8aRELBOCEwU/s400/78148026045136566857.jpg" width="430" /><br />
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">3. <i>The Social Network</i></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Hollywood started paying attention to the creepy qualities of Facebook in 2010. It was well documented in the creepy, surreal <i>Catfish</i>. <i>The Social Network </i>touches on what makes Facebook scary, from a privacy point of view, but is more content telling a great story with some tremendously memorable characters. So am I. I think in my review of this movie I compared it to <i>Citizen Kane</i>, in that it is a story of a youth&#8217;s rise to power and fortune at the cost of everything he once held dear. However, Mark is never that likable, he&#8217;s too distant and possibly mentally troubled for anyone to really get that close. <i>The Social Network </i>is an extraordinary film that I believe will still survive even after we&#8217;ve all moved on to whatever comes after Facebook.</p>
<p><img border="0" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TTJl00nzcsI/AAAAAAAAA9k/wI_MIlzWB4E/s400/Inception_still2323.jpg" width="430" /><br />
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">2. <i>Inception</i></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>I sure do like me some Chris Nolan, I tell you what. Is there anyone better than him when it comes to big action movies? He manages to make movies that are more thrilling than the Michael Bays of the world, and he still is able to fit in interesting plots and quality characters. <i>Inception </i>is a crazy movie for a lot of reasons, including just the fact that it was made with the big budget it had. It&#8217;s a real trip the first time through and you pick up more each time you revisit it, or at least I have.</p>
<p><img border="0" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TTJmGDFpFHI/AAAAAAAAA9s/hDCSgn2Hnj8/s400/arts-toy-story-3-584.jpg" width="430" /><br />
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">1. <i>Toy Story 3</i></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>I think we waited long enough for this one. The first two <i>Toy Story </i>movies are certainly among my favorite animated films, and Woody and Buzz are one of the best couples in cinema. There was some concern that the threequel for this series couldn&#8217;t live up to that legacy, especially so many years later. We&#8217;ve all grown up, and, fortunately, Andy did too. <i>Toy Story 3 </i>is a more mature film, dealing with some very adult themes and featuring some pretty harrowing sequences. Pixar did a great job with both the familiar and new, and provided us with a damn satisfying conclusion to a wonderful franchise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=828</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kevin&#8217;s Nine Movies of 2010</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=827</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=827#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 00:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Ten]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Overall, 2010 was a great year for Kevin. Regarding movies, however, 2010 was one of pity. I only racked up seeing nine movies in theaters this last year, not counting seeing Inception twice. All the movies I screened in the public setting I enjoyed and feel they can be ranked. They are as follows. (I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Overall, 2010 was a great year for Kevin.  Regarding movies, however, 2010 was one of pity.  I only racked up seeing nine movies in theaters this last year, not counting seeing Inception twice.  All the movies I screened in the public setting I enjoyed and feel they can be ranked.  They are as follows.  (I have approval from King of Damorgue to do this post as a top ten)</p>
<p><b>Movies I wanted to see (Honorable Mention):</b><br />True Grit<br />Red<br />The Town<br />Airplane!  </p>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_-8WxeU1zX_g/TS53XNfVPVI/AAAAAAAAANo/t6c8TPsZP44/s1600/get+him+to+the+greek.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="240" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_-8WxeU1zX_g/TS53XNfVPVI/AAAAAAAAANo/t6c8TPsZP44/s320/get+him+to+the+greek.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">9.  Get Him to the Greek  </span><br />This movie points out the hey that&#8217;s cool but so what test. &nbsp;It amusing, and I mostly remember that one scene in the Vegas hotel room where the one guy is&nbsp;battling&nbsp;his father while the other guy has smoked something that requires him to rub against carpet on the wall. &nbsp;The movie made me laugh, but when it was over, I forgot about it and don&#8217;t really care for it at all. &nbsp;The <i>Superbad</i> guy (pictured) is co-starring in the film. &nbsp;He is Kevin&#8217;s actor enemy #1. <br /><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><br /></span>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_-8WxeU1zX_g/TS53T_E4QGI/AAAAAAAAANk/UbUlhskn4uo/s1600/kick+ass.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="211" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_-8WxeU1zX_g/TS53T_E4QGI/AAAAAAAAANk/UbUlhskn4uo/s320/kick+ass.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">8.  Kick Ass</span><br />This film, in my mind, was a major success. &nbsp;Nicholas Cage has been going downhill in his movie performances ever since the first <i>National Treasure</i>. &nbsp;It was a pleasure to finally enjoy a movie where he doesn&#8217;t completely destroy it. &nbsp;Apparently, the key to success is to simply limit his amount of air time. &nbsp;Favorite scene has to be when the green monster runs into the gang right after he declares himself a superhero. &nbsp;It&#8217;s nice to see a superhero get the shit beaten out em&#8217; every now and then, just as long as its not batman, he is too cool.<br /><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><br /></span>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_-8WxeU1zX_g/TS53NuKfrCI/AAAAAAAAANg/bd7bWWWd41c/s1600/tron+legacy.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="144" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_-8WxeU1zX_g/TS53NuKfrCI/AAAAAAAAANg/bd7bWWWd41c/s320/tron+legacy.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">7.  Tron: Legacy</span><br />The full review of this film will be coming right after we finish up the top ten movies of 2010. &nbsp;Overall though, it was a visually entertaining film but, at movies end left me in a huge&nbsp;labyrinth&nbsp;that not even&nbsp;Wikipedia&nbsp;can help me get out of. &nbsp;For those that haven&#8217;t seen it, I would rate it as &#8220;go see it in theaters&#8221; but finish reading this post first. <br /><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><br /></span>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_-8WxeU1zX_g/TS53I9P7uWI/AAAAAAAAANc/ZUTra1xy_uM/s1600/social+network.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="209" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_-8WxeU1zX_g/TS53I9P7uWI/AAAAAAAAANc/ZUTra1xy_uM/s320/social+network.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">6.  The Social Network</span><br />As some of the more loyal readers of my parent blog may know, I am a huge fan of Aaron Sorkin&#8217;s work. &nbsp;When news came that he was working on a movie for the big screen, I didn&#8217;t care what it was about, I knew I would see it (even if it were about myspace). &nbsp;The facebook&nbsp;orientated&nbsp;film exceeded any expectations I had and even spurred a desire to &#8216;acquire&#8217; the movie and watch it again. &nbsp;The press power of this movie I have to accredit as it&#8217;s biggest success. &nbsp;After the world came to know that Mark Zuckerburg wasn&#8217;t the most generous or nice guy on the street, he has actively become involved in what is hopefully the start to a long future in philanthropy. &nbsp; <br /><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><br /></span>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_-8WxeU1zX_g/TS53E68F8_I/AAAAAAAAANY/NgIgGvShPT8/s1600/american.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="240" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_-8WxeU1zX_g/TS53E68F8_I/AAAAAAAAANY/NgIgGvShPT8/s320/american.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">5.  The American</span><br />As with a few others on the list, <i>The American</i>, is another film I saw where I had few others I could talk to about. &nbsp;Like the Sorkin film, I cannot say no to seeing George Clooney on the big screen, after <i>Up in the Air</i>, &nbsp;he, behind Harrison Ford, claims title of Kevin&#8217;s favorite&nbsp;thespian. &nbsp;Back to the film, odd would be a good way to describe it. &nbsp;This movie probably has the most dramatic ending of all the others on the list, I don&#8217;t think anyone saw it coming. &nbsp;Even though it is Clooney, I would wait to see this movie when it&#8217;s $4.99 at Target.<br />&nbsp; 
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_-8WxeU1zX_g/TS528PIWyXI/AAAAAAAAANU/XbRuDAN-Hxk/s1600/iron+man+2.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_-8WxeU1zX_g/TS528PIWyXI/AAAAAAAAANU/XbRuDAN-Hxk/s320/iron+man+2.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">4.  Iron Man 2</span><br />Beside the new batman films, Iron Man tops my list of the recent comic book superhero movies that have been hitting the screens over the last decade. &nbsp;Ever since <i>Air America, </i>Robert Downey Jr. I have viewed as a respectable actor. &nbsp;The&nbsp;sequel&nbsp;wasn&#8217;t nearly as good as the first, but still enjoyable. &nbsp;The scene I refer to the most in the film is when Stark has been summoned in front of the congressional board to give up his suit, and he hijacks the television to show that other countries are ten years away from Iron Man technology, then shows a video of the Hammer Industries suit blowing up and he&#8217;s like &#8220;Hammer Industries, twenty years.&#8221; &nbsp;If you haven&#8217;t seen the film, go buy it, when&nbsp;convenient. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_-8WxeU1zX_g/TS521_LtR7I/AAAAAAAAANQ/woZXpRLoRpQ/s1600/toy+story+3.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="240" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_-8WxeU1zX_g/TS521_LtR7I/AAAAAAAAANQ/woZXpRLoRpQ/s320/toy+story+3.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">3.  Toy Story 3</span><br />It was announced and advertised in theaters nearly a year before it finally came out so to say I was awaiting this movie is an understatement. &nbsp;However, I didn&#8217;t quite know how it could be done. &nbsp;Andy has grown up, the last one was already sad, so how could this movie possibly be any better. &nbsp;Somehow though, Pixar figured &nbsp;out how to do it. &nbsp;The movie brought plenty of laughs and good memories for not only has Andy grown up, but so have I since this film&#8217;s&nbsp;predecessor&nbsp;first came out. &nbsp;Yes, at movie&#8217;s end I did cry, the only time I can ever remember in a movie. &nbsp;If it were to go see <i>Toy Story 3</i>&nbsp;right now, I would authorize abandoning reading this post.
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_-8WxeU1zX_g/TS52tuhaCPI/AAAAAAAAANM/zGeFhJYIyzI/s1600/the+a+team.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="145" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_-8WxeU1zX_g/TS52tuhaCPI/AAAAAAAAANM/zGeFhJYIyzI/s320/the+a+team.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">2.  The A-team</span><br />Easily the best original film of the year for me. &nbsp;Liam&nbsp;Neison is awesome, very entertaining, and made me want to watch the television series. &nbsp;I can&#8217;t say anything bad about the film. &nbsp;It was exceptional! &nbsp;My favorite scene is&nbsp;pictured, it&#8217;s when the drone shoots down the teams escape from Germany and they try to &#8220;fly the tank.&#8221;<br /><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><br /></span>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_-8WxeU1zX_g/TS52lMoBsYI/AAAAAAAAANI/_NGMEfZxfTY/s1600/inception.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="212" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_-8WxeU1zX_g/TS52lMoBsYI/AAAAAAAAANI/_NGMEfZxfTY/s320/inception.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">1.  Inception  </span><br />Easily number one film on my list. &nbsp;This movie still blows me away. &nbsp;It seems to be the climax of a year of movies that like to mess with the mind. &nbsp;With lack of a better term, this movie is one big cluster fuck. &nbsp;Mr. Nolan went above and beyond with this film, I don&#8217;t know what else you could ask for it has: action, love, romance, comedy (go British guy!), and even some cartoons. &nbsp;Ever house should own this film and watch it over the holidays multiple times. &nbsp;The snow level was my favorite, &nbsp;it turns out the fortress (pictured) is a real place, actually a ski resort in Canada, that will be the location of my next trip and future empire. &nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=827</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Colin&#8217;s Top Ten Movies of 2010</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=826</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=826#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 07:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Ten]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m starting this post pretty late, so I hope I won&#8217;t be tempted to just write about how tired I am. &#160;Then again, I guess these lists are more about the rankings of the items on the lists rather than what we have to say about them. &#160;But anyways, I saw 29 movies over the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m starting this post pretty late, so I hope I won&#8217;t be tempted to just write about how tired I am. &nbsp;Then again, I guess these lists are more about the rankings of the items on the lists rather than what we have to say about them. &nbsp;But anyways, I saw 29 movies over the course of 2010, which seems like less than most years, but I&#8217;m not really sure.</p>
<p><b>Honorable Mentions:</b><br />The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo<br />The Fighter<br />Winter&#8217;s Bone<br />Black Swan</p>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TS15jNT_m_I/AAAAAAAAA9s/kQQRMFyUUOU/s1600/please_give_2010_685x385.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="179" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TS15jNT_m_I/AAAAAAAAA9s/kQQRMFyUUOU/s320/please_give_2010_685x385.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">10. Please Give</span><br />
<table>
<tbody></tbody>
</table>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">Not really a film that&#8217;s gotten a whole lot of recognition, but i guess the world&#8217;s already had it&#8217;s share of Catherine Keener indie comedies, or at least you would think so. &nbsp;Fortunately, Keener plays a slightly more quirky and nuanced version of the typical mom roles she usually plays, plus there&#8217;s a great supporting cast to boot. &nbsp;With it&#8217;s New York setting and somewhat neurotic characters, it&#8217;s easy to compare <i>Please Give</i> to golden era Woody Allen, but the film&#8217;s humor, warmth, and interesting characters make it more than worthy of the comparison.</p>
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TS2AGAcpQ9I/AAAAAAAAA9w/xnn5mWzCyR4/s1600/greenberg-full-movie-download.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="212" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TS2AGAcpQ9I/AAAAAAAAA9w/xnn5mWzCyR4/s320/greenberg-full-movie-download.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">9. Greenberg</span><br />A film that pretty much no one saw, and I&#8217;m sure half of those who did see it didn&#8217;t really latch on to <i>Greenberg</i>. But I guess that&#8217;s the kind of response Noah Baumbach usually expects, as he seems to have no problem in making his characters as unlikeable and unpredictable as possible. I wish Ben Stiller had followed this up with something better than Little Fockwads, because <i>Greenberg</i> shows that he can be damn compelling when he wants to be.</p>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TS2A9qWKQsI/AAAAAAAAA90/NuN9uu4YiWE/s1600/true-grit-2010-movie-screenshot-495px.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="213" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TS2A9qWKQsI/AAAAAAAAA90/NuN9uu4YiWE/s320/true-grit-2010-movie-screenshot-495px.png" width="320" /></a></div>
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"></div>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">8. True Grit</span></div>
</td>
<td width="150">
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"></div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>The Coen Brothers are simply good at making their own brand of whatever the hell genre they feel like tackling for their yearly movie. &nbsp;They don&#8217;t necessarily stretch themselves too much with <i>True Grit</i>, but it&#8217;s got more than it&#8217;s share of memorable quintessentially Coen Brothers-esque moments, as well as great breakout performances from Hailee Steinfeld and that bright-eyed up and comer, Jeff Bridges.</p>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TS2BqGsh42I/AAAAAAAAA94/kCOpzJRBZSs/s1600/kids-are-all-right-bening-moore.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="212" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TS2BqGsh42I/AAAAAAAAA94/kCOpzJRBZSs/s320/kids-are-all-right-bening-moore.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"></div>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px; font-size: x-large;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; font-size: small;"></span></span></span></div>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">7. The Kids Are All Right&nbsp;</span></div>
</td>
<td width="150">
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"></div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>It&#8217;s always nice to see a film that feels very much a product of it&#8217;s time and place, but also doesn&#8217;t feel like it&#8217;s trying to be topical or make some sort of statement, and that&#8217;s about what&nbsp;<i>The Kids Are All Right</i>&nbsp;feels like to me. &nbsp;It&#8217;s just a shame that Hollywood has grown more and more wary of making smaller, character-driven films like this in the wake of the economy&#8217;s current state.
<div></div>
</td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TS2B81zz5yI/AAAAAAAAA98/Wu3yBttOoOc/s1600/A-Prophet-600_full_600.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="213" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TS2B81zz5yI/AAAAAAAAA98/Wu3yBttOoOc/s320/A-Prophet-600_full_600.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"></div>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">6. A Prophet</span></div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">I think this film was nominated for the 2009 Best Foreign Film Oscar, but wasn&#8217;t released in the States until 2010, so I&#8217;m counting it as a 2010 film. &nbsp;Either way it would have been on my top 10 of 2009, as it&#8217;s easily one of the grittiest crime dramas I&#8217;ve seen in years. &nbsp;I know prison isn&#8217;t exactly the most unique source of subject matter in film, but <i>A Prophet</i>&nbsp;is nonetheless a brutal, insightful, tragic, and very well-made piece of French cinema.</div>
</td>
<td width="150">
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"></div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TS2CppDmrII/AAAAAAAAA-A/xWCLpYlIFPY/s1600/The-Kings-Speech_full_600.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="213" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TS2CppDmrII/AAAAAAAAA-A/xWCLpYlIFPY/s320/The-Kings-Speech_full_600.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"></div>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">5. The King&#8217;s Speech&nbsp;</span></div>
</td>
<td width="150">
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"></div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Geoffrey Rush and Colin Firth always seemed like two very talented actors, but I&#8217;d never really seen anything that either of them had done that would lead me to appreciate their abilities as performers. &nbsp;Well, <i>The King&#8217;s Speech</i> swiftly killed those two birds with one stone for me, because both of them give tremendous performances and are perfect foils for each other in this splendid period drama. &nbsp;Plus, you got to love any movie that let&#8217;s you see Britain&#8217;s king say &#8220;fuck, fuck, fuck&#8221;.
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TS2DJnIvPMI/AAAAAAAAA-E/Z7SLIbtHaUQ/s1600/127-hours-still1.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="212" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TS2DJnIvPMI/AAAAAAAAA-E/Z7SLIbtHaUQ/s320/127-hours-still1.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"></div>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">4. 127 Hours</span></div>
</td>
<td width="150">
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"></div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>I feel like I&#8217;m usually against the use of the hyper-stylized filmmaking that seems to be plaguing a lot of Hollywood films, and then I see something like <i>127 Hours</i>. &nbsp;Danny Boyle turns this familiar story into an adrenaline rush of a film, and never really lets you go. &nbsp;I&#8217;m not sure &#8220;life-affirming&#8221; is a term I would use lightly to describe a lot of films, but <i>127 Hours</i> comes pretty darn close to it.
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TS2Dh3rZTdI/AAAAAAAAA-I/uMTkKQBrvyw/s1600/Inception-movie-image-2.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="213" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TS2Dh3rZTdI/AAAAAAAAA-I/uMTkKQBrvyw/s320/Inception-movie-image-2.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"></div>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">3. Inception</span></div>
</td>
<td width="150">
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"></div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen <i>Inception</i> three times now, and every time I see it I always notice something really cool about it that I didn&#8217;t notice before, but then I also notice a few things about it that don&#8217;t really work for me about the story as a whole. &nbsp;But I guess that&#8217;s what makes <i>Inception</i>, well <i>Inception</i>. &nbsp;It&#8217;s a film filled with all these little details that you can pick and pull apart as you choose, which makes for a film that&#8217;s far from perfect, but is an amazing achievement nonetheless.
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TS2Ed2kzBVI/AAAAAAAAA-M/H-TSBsu5gL4/s1600/toy-story-3-screenshot.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="179" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TS2Ed2kzBVI/AAAAAAAAA-M/H-TSBsu5gL4/s320/toy-story-3-screenshot.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"></div>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">2. Toy Story 3</span></div>
</td>
<td width="150">
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"></div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>The expectations where high for <i>Toy Story 3</i>, and it seemed almost inevitable that Pixar would at least meet them, which they certainly did. &nbsp;I probably wouldn&#8217;t say it&#8217;s quite as good as the first two, but man the second half of this movie has some heartbreakingly tender shit in it. &nbsp;It kind of makes me feel spoiled that Pixar has given us such an impressive run of films, and all we have to look forward to next year is <i>Cars 2</i>. &nbsp;Oh well.
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TS2FA423p7I/AAAAAAAAA-Q/0BVh_Jwsz-Q/s1600/the-social-network-movie-review1.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TS2FA423p7I/AAAAAAAAA-Q/0BVh_Jwsz-Q/s320/the-social-network-movie-review1.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
</div>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"></div>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">1. The Social Network</span></div>
</td>
<td width="150">
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"></div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>The main reason I&#8217;m posting this so late is because I wanted to see <i>The Social Network</i> again, which came out on DVD today. &nbsp;I really had no interest in seeing a movie about Facebook when I first heard about this film, but I guess that just goes to show you that if you have the right elements, you can make a great film about anything as long as it&#8217;s done in a fresh and compelling way. &nbsp;<i>The Social Network</i> also shows us just what a fantastic filmmaker David Fincher can be when he gets a hold of a good script. &nbsp;Hell, he can make a decent film even with a somewhat lousy script (<i>The Curious Case of Benjamin Button</i>), but luckily Aaron Sorkin provided him with one for the ages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=826</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John&#8217;s Top Ten Movies of 2010</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=825</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=825#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 01:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Ten]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here at DaMorgue, we take our time when it comes to selecting our favorite films of the year. We all have so much passion for film, so it&#8217;s something we don&#8217;t take lightly. I mean it takes time to see all the movies worth seeing, especially when they cram all the best ones into the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here at DaMorgue, we take our time when it comes to selecting our favorite films of the year. We all have so much passion for film, so it&#8217;s something we don&#8217;t take lightly. I mean it takes time to see all the movies worth seeing, especially when they cram all the best ones into the last couple of months. There&#8217;s still some films I wanted I see from 2010, but I&#8217;ll have to settle with the 42 I&#8217;m at right now, which is certainly more than last year. Either way, I can confidently say I loved all ten of these films and am very much satisfied with my final ten, but before we dive in let&#8217;s acknowledge the film&#8217;s that came close. </p>
<p><b>Honorable Mention</b><br /><b>Buried:</b> The fact that this is movie is entirely set  in a wooden box and is still entertaining is reason enough for an honorable mention.</p>
<p><b>The King&#8217;s Speech:</b> A marvelously acted period piece that just barely made the cut. </p>
<p><b>Kick Ass:</b> Dumb fun, but man, you&#8217;d be hard pressed to find a more entertaining action flick. </p>
<p><b>Little Big Soldier</b> This Jackie Chan period piece is a heartwarming buddy picture. These are the kind of movies Chan should be devoting his time to, not <i>The Spy Next Door.</i></p>
<p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">10. The Fighter</span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TSu7KtwErxI/AAAAAAAAB5Y/H16ycDCv1ow/s1600/2010_the_fighter_001.jpg"><img style="float:none; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 213px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TSu7KtwErxI/AAAAAAAAB5Y/H16ycDCv1ow/s320/2010_the_fighter_001.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5560743957673324306" /></a> <br />What it lacks in originality it makes up for in thrills and dramatic skill, hey maybe I&#8217;m a poet and I just don&#8217;t know it. Marky Mark is surrounded by perhaps the best supporting cast of the year including; Melissa Leo, Amy Adams and the always intense Christian Bale. The fights are full of highs and lows as are the heart aching scenes between it&#8217;s struggling characters, it&#8217;s a real knockout. </p>
<p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">9. The Ghost Writer</span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TSu7gLOpH6I/AAAAAAAAB5g/cj7mawc-9mc/s1600/2010_the_ghost_writer_017.jpg"><img style="float:none; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 213px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TSu7gLOpH6I/AAAAAAAAB5g/cj7mawc-9mc/s320/2010_the_ghost_writer_017.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5560744326363422626" /></a> <br />Rarely do I have the taste for political thrillers. Too often these kind of films seem to slip into convoluted plots, involving stiff characters with even more convoluted motivations, but leave it to a seasoned filmmaker like Roman Polanski to add a spark to the genre. A likable Ewan McGregor plays &#8220;The Ghost&#8221;, a talented ghostwriter hired to complete the memoirs of a former British Prime Minister (Pierce &#8220;Mr . Charming&#8221; Brosnan), but what happens when he digs too deep? It&#8217;s suspenseful, dramatic, and clever, but not so much that it loses sight of telling a great story of deception and oh yes, death!</p>
<p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">8. Winter&#8217;s Bone</span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TSu8AXA53zI/AAAAAAAAB5o/K2Vr8ezlg-I/s1600/winters_bone_torino_film_festival.jpg"><img style="float:none; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 214px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TSu8AXA53zI/AAAAAAAAB5o/K2Vr8ezlg-I/s320/winters_bone_torino_film_festival.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5560744879282839346" /></a> <br />Had it not been for the award buzz, I may have never even heard about this subtle portrait of poverty and family hardship. The young Jennifer Lawrence carries this heavy drama (that borders on neo noir) with a stunning amount of professionalism and the supporting cast of dark and colorful characters truly bring this heartbreaker to life. I&#8217;ve been a fan of the talented actor John Hawkes since <i>Deadwood</i>, so he&#8217;s what originally drew me to this film, but he&#8217;s just one part of this heavy hitter. A prime example of a movie that doesn&#8217;t need big names to attract attention, just something to say. </p>
<p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">7. The Kids Are All Right</span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TSu8ReLxerI/AAAAAAAAB5w/MF2wYskdyh4/s1600/264095-2010_the_kids_are_all_right_003_super.jpg"><img style="float:none; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 212px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TSu8ReLxerI/AAAAAAAAB5w/MF2wYskdyh4/s320/264095-2010_the_kids_are_all_right_003_super.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5560745173265250994" /></a><br />Nothing like a well fashioned &#8220;Dramedy&#8221; to deliver both the laughs and tears we all look for in the movie going experience, the one&#8217;s of us that aren&#8217;t braindead anyway.   It&#8217;s the classic high and low film about family, with a bit of a twist. Annette Bening and Julianne Moore as a gay couple doesn&#8217;t sound too shocking to must of the people that will probably see it, but still I can&#8217;t recall seeing that in any recent film and in that case, it&#8217;s a breath of fresh air. Both leads are equally amusing, exchanging surprisingly genuine dialogue between their children (Mia Wasikowska, Josh Hutcherson) and who else but &#8220;Mr. Nice Guy&#8221; Mark Ruffalo. There&#8217;s awkward pauses and silences, it&#8217;s an excellently executed slice of life. </p>
<p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">6. 127 Hours</span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TSu8gqle_zI/AAAAAAAAB54/9ZH0ePnGufs/s1600/127_hours_james_franco_danny_boyle.jpg"><img style="float:none; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 240px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TSu8gqle_zI/AAAAAAAAB54/9ZH0ePnGufs/s320/127_hours_james_franco_danny_boyle.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5560745434292354866" /></a><br />I still get dizzy thinking about the latest ADD survival film from Danny Boyle. Who thought you could make a movie about a guy (James Franco) pinned by a rock, so overwhelmingly intense? Maybe it&#8217;s the build up to that finale, I mean we all know what&#8217;s coming right? Even so it&#8217;s never dull or even remotely tedious. For that I think you can thank one; the energy of it&#8217;s star James Franco and two, the high adrenaline visual storytelling of Danny Boyle. That guy never wastes a frame and every one here is beyond intense. </p>
<p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">5. The Town</span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TSu8u6yZMQI/AAAAAAAAB6A/-sXOwSSDs10/s1600/the-town-movie-image-ben-affleck-and-jeremy-renner.jpg"><img style="float:none; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 230px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TSu8u6yZMQI/AAAAAAAAB6A/-sXOwSSDs10/s320/the-town-movie-image-ben-affleck-and-jeremy-renner.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5560745679159636226" /></a> <br />You&#8217;ve heard of films that are nail-biters right? Well by the end of this one you&#8217;ll of probably knawed your whole arm off, a la Aron Ralston. Really, it&#8217;s that suspenseful and one of the best heist films in years. It&#8217;s like if <i>Point Break</i> and <i>Heat</i> had a baby and then gave it Surge cola, a roller-coaster of drama and some of the best action scenes of the year. Remember how people used to make fun of Ben Affleck? Like &#8220;Oh Bennifer, he was in <i>Gigli</i> he sucks blah blah.&#8221; well you can shut the fuck up now, because he&#8217;s proven himself with this one. Not only as an actor, but as well as a writer and director. I never lost faith in Ben Affleck but if you did, check this out, you&#8217;ll plummet right out of your seat and straight into the crossfire that is <i>The Town.</i></p>
<p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">4. Toy Story 3</span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TSu831Y6MzI/AAAAAAAAB6I/NggSpa75ps4/s1600/36470.jpg"><img style="float:none; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 179px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TSu831Y6MzI/AAAAAAAAB6I/NggSpa75ps4/s320/36470.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5560745832329392946" /></a><br />The film that apparently can bring even the most hardened men to tears, I present to you <i>Toy Story 3</i>. It&#8217;s bittersweet saying goodbye to the beloved franchise, but what a way to go out. The story is moving and exciting, the laughs timely, and the animation awe inspiring. On one hand it&#8217;s like the conclusion to my childhood, but on the other it&#8217;ll be with me forever. Future generations are going to be spoiled with this beyond amazing catalog of classics Pixar has created and this is one of their best. </p>
<p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">3. The Social Network</span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TSu9R1OhrkI/AAAAAAAAB6Q/nqV0m-4bB6M/s1600/socialnetwork.jpg"><img style="float:none; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 212px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TSu9R1OhrkI/AAAAAAAAB6Q/nqV0m-4bB6M/s320/socialnetwork.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5560746278962441794" /></a><br />I remember how opposed I was to this once. &#8220;It&#8217;s not even that original of an idea, why should we put these douchebags in the spotlight?&#8221; But that&#8217;s not what it&#8217;s about. It&#8217;s not about the content of the creation as much as it is the struggle to protect that creation. I mean what can I say, a good story is a good story and Fincher and Sorkin deliver a film that&#8217;s not only fun to look at, but to listen to. It&#8217;s young stars are captivating including; the neurotic Mark (Jesse Eisenberg), the naive Eduardo (Andrew Garfield), the sly Sean (Justin Timberlake, never thought I&#8217;d compliment him) and my favorite, the arrogant but entertaining Winklevoss twins played mostly by (Armie Hammer.) With Facebook being one of the most defining social devices of our time, it only makes sense that <i>The Social Network</i> will go down as a defining film of this era, glad I was there to experience it. </p>
<p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">2. Black Swan</span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TSu9f1rouFI/AAAAAAAAB6Y/YysbhCMBaIw/s1600/black_swan_2010_1024x768_874712.jpg"><img style="float:none; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 213px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TSu9f1rouFI/AAAAAAAAB6Y/YysbhCMBaIw/s320/black_swan_2010_1024x768_874712.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5560746519602706514" /></a> <br />Few films left me this year with the kind of goosebumps I received from viewing <i>Black Swan</i>, or should I say &#8220;swanbumps?&#8221; Darren Aronofosky has clearly emerged as one of the most interesting directors working today and <i>Black Swan</i>  will only further his status as a true auteur. It&#8217;s an eerily beautiful film propelled by the eerily beautiful performance of Natalie Portman (possibly her best role to date.) It almost reminds me of the kind of nightmare Italian director Dario Argento would dream up, like <i>Suspiria</i>, which coincidentally is set at a ballet academy. The difference being that in all it&#8217;s twisted imagery and scenes, <i>Black Swan</i> is surprisingly coherent in it&#8217;s parallel of the iconic Swan Lake and that makes it dance circles around <i>Suspria</i> </p>
<p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">1. Inception</span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TSu9vJklh2I/AAAAAAAAB6g/g4mD7LnrTGc/s1600/2010_inception_001.jpg"><img style="float:none; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 214px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TSu9vJklh2I/AAAAAAAAB6g/g4mD7LnrTGc/s320/2010_inception_001.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5560746782639884130" /></a><br />As if it&#8217;s any surprise, <i>Inception</i> is an instant classic rich with visuals and metaphors. It&#8217;s the kind of film that taps into your mind and sits there, eventually laying eggs in your brain. The fact that writer/director Christopher Nolan can make a movie this dense a blockbuster hit, just goes to show that he knows entertainment and quality storytelling. He pulls our strings with suspense and fucks up our minds with one of the most clever films in years. He has truly incepted my heart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=825</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DK Checks In</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=824</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=824#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 03:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=824</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Donkey Kong Country Returns Yeah, this has been out for awhile but seeing that it was a Christmas gift, I wanted to wait till I&#8217;d played through it a bit. Unfortunately I went back to school (minus my Wii) before finishing it, but I think I&#8217;ve played it enough to come to a reasonably fair [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"> <i>Donkey Kong Country Returns</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.5.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TSU-iN0RwTI/AAAAAAAAB5I/zlPf6_LeyCg/s1600/Donkeykongcountryreturns.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 229px; height: 320px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TSU-iN0RwTI/AAAAAAAAB5I/zlPf6_LeyCg/s320/Donkeykongcountryreturns.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5558918072604148018" /></a><br />Yeah, this has been out for awhile but seeing that it was a Christmas gift, I wanted to wait till I&#8217;d played through it a bit. Unfortunately I went back to school (minus my Wii) before finishing it, but I think I&#8217;ve played it enough to come to a reasonably fair conclusion, that it&#8217;s awesome. </p>
<p>First of all for those who don&#8217;t know, the original <i>Donkey Kong Country</i> is one of my all-time favorite games, were talking like top three. The two sequels, although disappointing due to the absence of DK, were quite enjoyable as well, but then there was nothing… Until now, yes a true return to form for the classic side-scroller series that&#8217;s been worth the wait. </p>
<p>Before I dive into this jungle of fun, let me give you a brief overview of the plot, not that it&#8217;s important in a game like this. So DK and Diddy are just chillin&#8217; when these evil Tikis known as the &#8220;Tiki Tak Tribe&#8221;, come along and start hypnotizing animals and steal DK&#8217;s coveted Banana hoard. That&#8217;s some deep shit right? So there&#8217;s no more Kremlins (the original antagonists of the series), but when a game is this exciting, I don&#8217;t mind a few changes to the formula. I mean you want to differentiate this from the original to some extent, that was like 16 years ago and In my eyes, almost every change/addition that&#8217;s been made was for the best.</p>
<p>Despite owning a Wii, I&#8217;ve never been much of a fan of shaking my wrist all around like Michael J. Fox, (I&#8217;m so sorry for that remark) but in <i>Donkey Kong Country Returns</i>, it just flows so smoothly like an extension of your body. New features made possible by the Wii-mote include; ground pounding, blowing out flowers/flames, and if your Diddy Kong, a jet pack and peanut gun. Which reminds me, if you&#8217;re going to play this game &#8220;Play it with a friend.&#8221; The multiplayer now resembles a style that&#8217;s very much akin to the  <i>New Super Mario Bros. Wii</i>, with both characters moving completely independently across treacherous stages and boss battles, hilarity ensues.</p>
<p>Really, my only complaint is that it doesn&#8217;t have the same kind of atmosphere that the original achieved. Sure the new one is light hearted, bright, and colorful, but I was always impressed by the serene, sometimes even moody tone of the original. The music and photo realistic backgrounds somehow made a game about an ape with a tie, well real. The new one is your typical Wii tone, bright and cheery and though it uses most of the original games music, it never achieves the same feel. Nonetheless that complaint doesn&#8217;t really effect the gameplay and in many ways this game might even be superior to it&#8217;s predecessor. I&#8217;m just glad the series is back, the long wait was making me go bananas, eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=824</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sean&#8217;s Top Ten Albums of 2010</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=823</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=823#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 13:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Ten]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I look back at 2010, I&#8217;ll remember it as the year that I tried to get into two new genres. One was electronic music, which I would say was a great success thanks to terrific albums from the likes of Flying Lotus and Four Tet. Then there was my failed attempt to get into [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I look back at 2010, I&#8217;ll remember it as the year that I tried to get into two new genres. One was electronic music, which I would say was a great success thanks to terrific albums from the likes of Flying Lotus and Four Tet. Then there was my failed attempt to get into hip hop, although I didn&#8217;t really listen to modern music from that genre. I did think <i>My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy</i> was kind of amazing in a terrible way. That Titus Andronicus album was really good. So was that album <i>Brothers </i>by that band the Black Keys. I even liked the new New Pornographers album. In fact, I listened to 41 albums in 2010, and had to make some painful cuts for this post. But these are the ones that stuck with me.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">10. Menomena &#8211; <i>Mines</i></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TJrQ5r5e3VI/AAAAAAAAA6M/VjL2QfnUgr8/s1600/Up-1Menomena.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TJrQ5r5e3VI/AAAAAAAAA6M/VjL2QfnUgr8/s200/Up-1Menomena.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<p>Gotta rep a Portland band while I still can. Because everyone knows once you move out of Oregon you must forget about it and your time spent there forever. Menomena has an interesting recording process that has resulted in a beautiful collection of intricate, complex songs. They&#8217;re melodic when they need to be, rocking when necessary. So what gave <i>Mines </i>an edge over some of the other amazing albums from the past year? Well, I&#8217;m not quite sure. I guess I like it a lot. I keep coming back for more, and I&#8217;d say that &#8220;Killemall&#8221; and &#8220;Tithe&#8221; are among my favorite tracks of all of 2010. While I loved something like <i>The Monitor</i>, I haven&#8217;t listened to it in its entirety since July. I listened to <i>Mines </i>over the weekend. This is just one of those terrifically accessible albums that anyone could enjoy and keep coming back to &#8211; even in the scary blank slate that is 2011.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">9. Broken Bells &#8211; <i>Broken Bells</i></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TSRf_PpMChI/AAAAAAAAA78/SdlSmeUFtaY/s1600/Broken_Bells_Cover.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="199" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TSRf_PpMChI/AAAAAAAAA78/SdlSmeUFtaY/s200/Broken_Bells_Cover.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<p>Yeah, that&#8217;s right. More of that Oregon sound. Well, that&#8217;s probably not fair, since this sounds a lot more like Danger Mouse than the Shins. Whatever. I know <i>Broken Bells</i> is not the most popular pick for these lists since, well, the album was not that popular. But if you look at the criticism a lot of people levied against it, the main complaint is that it wasn&#8217;t a big enough departure for either of the artists. Maybe it&#8217;s because I haven&#8217;t heard much from either of them the past few years, but I&#8217;m OK with them not breaking a ton of new ground. This is one of the catchiest albums I heard all of last year, and the first album I was really looking forward to back in 2009. In a year with middling releases from the Gaslight Anthem, the Hold Steady, Interpol, MGMT, Murder By Death, and even Shout Out Louds, it was nice to hear some new material from guys I already knew that was really good.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">8. Broken Social Scene &#8211; <i>Forgiveness Rock Record</i></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TSRgyR0L8CI/AAAAAAAAA8A/j7VmP7iGLvI/s1600/Forgiveness_Rock_Record.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="186" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TSRgyR0L8CI/AAAAAAAAA8A/j7VmP7iGLvI/s200/Forgiveness_Rock_Record.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<p>Hey, here&#8217;s a band I knew nothing about a year ago. And yet there I was on the first day of summer perched on a hill watching them rock it out. So when I finally got home, I had to check out there new album, and, well, it&#8217;s awesome. I don&#8217;t know if you know this about me, but I like things that are awesome. I still haven&#8217;t gone back and checked out most of the Broken Social Scene discography, but <i>Forgiveness Rock Record </i>is, at the very least, enjoyable for newbies. Man, I actually saw a lot of bands live last year, didn&#8217;t I? It&#8217;s so easy to forget. Phoenix, Japandroids, My Morning Jacket, even that silly not-cowboy band. And Patton Oswalt! That guy&#8217;s funny. Remember when he made fun of &#8220;Home,&#8221; Colin? That&#8217;s a special moment that we&#8217;ll get to cherish forever.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">7. Caribou &#8211; <i>Swim</i></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TSRiHKnnMzI/AAAAAAAAA8E/yYorPlc6vvo/s1600/Caribou_-_Swim.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TSRiHKnnMzI/AAAAAAAAA8E/yYorPlc6vvo/s200/Caribou_-_Swim.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<p>Speaking of Colin, I believe he admitted to me that he at least really liked the first track off <i>Swim</i>. So that&#8217;s something I guess. I like most of them, but &#8220;Odessa&#8221; sure is nice. I love that Caribou called the album &#8220;swim&#8221; because they managed to give the entire thing an underwater feeling that I am in no way qualified to explain or even quantify. That&#8217;s right, double q-word sentence. Fuck me I&#8217;m tired. Um, here&#8217;s my advise for anyone who is not sure if they&#8217;ll like this album. Download it, put the whole thing in your library, and start playing the first track. Now here&#8217;s the tricky part: walk away. Not too far, you still want to be able to hear it. Just far enough that you won&#8217;t be tempted to change to something else. Just listen to the whole damn thing. You&#8217;ll get it. And then you&#8217;ll be like, &#8220;ah yeah, this is good.&#8221; Or, in the worst case scenario: &#8220;those were 40 minutes that I feel I wasted.&#8221;</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">6. Sufjan Stevens &#8211; <i>The Age of Adz</i></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TLwonavvHCI/AAAAAAAAA6o/JNq1xxn7uCI/s1600/Sufjanstevensageofadz.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TLwonavvHCI/AAAAAAAAA6o/JNq1xxn7uCI/s200/Sufjanstevensageofadz.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<p>Here&#8217;s another album that I feel like I enjoyed more than other critics simply because I haven&#8217;t listened to a Sufjan Stevens that wasn&#8217;t <i>Illinoise.</i> So, from my crazy point of view, that was his first album and this is his many-years-later followup. Maybe I should listen to more EPs. Anyway, oddly enough my most listened to track on <i>The Age of Adz </i>is the 25-minute &#8220;Impossible Soul&#8221; at the end of the album. Now, I like long songs, but that seems ridiculous even to me. How could this happen? I could have listened to the first track, &#8220;Futile Devices&#8221; over a hundred times more if I had spent my time listening to it instead of &#8220;Impossible Soul.&#8221; Boy, we can do much more together.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">5. Deerhunter &#8211; <i>Halcyon Digest</i></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TNHJDo9LO9I/AAAAAAAAA6w/mD7b7marbPI/s1600/Halcyondigest.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="191" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TNHJDo9LO9I/AAAAAAAAA6w/mD7b7marbPI/s200/Halcyondigest.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<p>Is this real life? Is this a dream? Is this going to be forever? Questions such as these, which may or may not have been asked (and some would say, answered) by David after dentist will haunt your mind every second you spend listening to <i>Halcyon Digest</i>. You know what I mean? Of course you don&#8217;t, no one does. It never happens. Sorry, Ted, that&#8217;s a dumb question, skip that. Skip all these questions. Just go listen to the lush, beautiful album from another tremendous band from Georgia. No! That&#8217;s just what I&#8217;ll be expecting you to do! There&#8217;s a sale at Penny&#8217;s! It&#8217;s a damn good thing you don&#8217;t know how much he hates your guts. I guess the foot&#8217;s on the other hand now, isn&#8217;t it, reader?</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">4. LCD Soundsystem &#8211; <i>This is Happening</i></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TSRoBKtRtZI/AAAAAAAAA8I/o5_c-eE9pqc/s1600/Lcdthisishappening.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TSRoBKtRtZI/AAAAAAAAA8I/o5_c-eE9pqc/s200/Lcdthisishappening.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<p>I&#8217;ve never been raped, but I imagine rapists say something along the lines of &#8220;this is happening&#8221; while they&#8217;re assaulting you and you&#8217;re trying to fight them off. So this is kind of like LCD Soundsystem is raping me. He lures you in, sounding all quiet and friendly, talking like a jerk, except you actually are a jerk. Then he lunges at you, instantly getting louder, and indeed, bolder. He has his way with you, making you feel like drunk girls as he takes his one touch. All I want is to get away at this point, but he won&#8217;t let me. &#8220;I can change,&#8221; he says. &#8220;You wanted a hit, right?&#8221; I ask, he hesitates, trying to understand what I meant and then: Pow Pow! My one two punch knocks him off as I get away. Somebody&#8217;s calling me, I hear him trying to give chase. But it&#8217;s too late, I&#8217;ve escaped. Time to go home.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">3. Beach House &#8211; <i>Teen Dream</i></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TSRpM2iwMLI/AAAAAAAAA8M/YbmP11y3k6E/s1600/Teendream.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TSRpM2iwMLI/AAAAAAAAA8M/YbmP11y3k6E/s200/Teendream.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<p>You ever wonder why this album is called <i>Teen Dream</i>? I&#8217;m not sure what&#8217;s so &#8220;teen&#8221; about it, although it certainly is dreamlike. Seems to me like albums as good as this should be given away for free to anyone who&#8217;s having a bad day or is just really tired or over-thinking things. There is a tender, emotional quality to Beach House&#8217;s music that soothes me, like one of those dudes who makes snakes dance. It&#8217;s just that charming. According to this iTunes I&#8217;ve listened to <i>Teen Dream</i> 27 times since I last restored my iTunes library, which was, I believe, around September. Is that a lot? For me, yes. Not for all people though. Frankly, it&#8217;s a rather useless bit of information that will ultimately make no difference in anyone&#8217;s life. I&#8217;m sorry for wasting your time.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">2. The National &#8211; <i>High Violet</i></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TSRrJ9qyhNI/AAAAAAAAA8Q/4QXVpYw2NPU/s1600/Highviolet.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TSRrJ9qyhNI/AAAAAAAAA8Q/4QXVpYw2NPU/s200/Highviolet.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<p>This just goes on forever, doesn&#8217;t it? I&#8217;m so goddamn tired. Anyway, like Johnny O I just got into the National this year in time to go see them live. That makes me sound really spoiled, doesn&#8217;t it? I&#8217;m seeing them live, so I should probably familiarize myself with their music. Meanwhile, there are people all over the country who have loved the National since they released their first single who have never been afforded a chance to see them live. Please forgive me for my selfishness. If it makes you feel any better, I did really like <i>High Violet</i>. Especially as the weather took a turn for the colder and I lost sleep in favor of schoolwork. I should probably write some specifics, but frankly I&#8217;m still listening to <i>Teen Dream </i>right now and that&#8217;s making me keep forgetting what the National sound like.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">1. Arcade Fire &#8211; <i>The Suburbs</i></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TSRszLS0ptI/AAAAAAAAA8U/pD-LB0u5UaU/s1600/Arcade_Fire_-_The_Suburbs.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="198" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TSRszLS0ptI/AAAAAAAAA8U/pD-LB0u5UaU/s200/Arcade_Fire_-_The_Suburbs.png" width="200" /></a></div>
<p>These people out there, they look at Arcade Fire and <i>Funeral </i>and say, &#8220;Whelp, they&#8217;re done.&#8221; Well, let me let you in on a secret: Arcade Fire&#8217;s been getting better with each album. Sure, they haven&#8217;t matched the raw emotionality of <i>Funeral </i>in there last two albums, but the group has continued to pursue more complex songwriting and themes somehow more challenging than life and death. We all live and we all will die. Arcade Fire has moved on, and their latest project, about growing up in the suburbs, shows the universality of that experience, the good and the bad. While that means they won&#8217;t be scoring any amazing movie trailers with the new stuff, that doesn&#8217;t mean the new stuff isn&#8217;t good. In fact, it&#8217;s amazing. Wow, what a terrible ending to a questionable post. I apologize for my writing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=823</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Colin&#8217;s Top Ten Albums of 2010</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=822</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=822#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 02:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Ten]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There was a lot of music that came of 2010 that I really enjoyed. I think my grand total for albums was around 25, which is considerably more than I usually end up with. I&#8217;m not sure if I&#8217;m becoming more open towards new music, or if I&#8217;m just running out of older music to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table>
<tbody></tbody>
</table>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;">There was a lot of music that came of 2010 that I really enjoyed. I think my grand total for albums was around 25, which is considerably more than I usually end up with. I&#8217;m not sure if I&#8217;m becoming more open towards new music, or if I&#8217;m just running out of older music to listen to. But either way, there were so many albums I liked this year that I actually felt compelled to do some honorable mentions for once.</span>
<div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"><br /></span></div>
<div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"><b>Honorable Mentions:</b></span></div>
<div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;">Ariel Pink&#8217;s Haunted Graffitti &#8211; <i>Before Today</i></span></div>
<div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;">Spoon &#8211; </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"><i>Transference</i></span></div>
<div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;">Deerhunter &#8211; <i>Halcyon Digest</i></span></div>
<div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;">Kanye West &#8211; <i>My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy</i></span><br /><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"><i><br /></i></span></div>
<div>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">10. The Tallest Man On Earth &#8211; </span><i><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">The Wild Hunt</span></i></td>
<td width="150"><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TSPdy_v4m0I/AAAAAAAAA9k/yIdUFJwtddQ/s1600/the-tallest-man-on-earth-the-wild-hunt-album-cover.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TSPdy_v4m0I/AAAAAAAAA9k/yIdUFJwtddQ/s200/the-tallest-man-on-earth-the-wild-hunt-album-cover.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"><span class="Apple-style-span">I had hard time keeping more sonically impressive albums like the latest from Deerhunter and Kanye off my list.  But for my number 10, I decided to go for something much less ambitous, but equally arresting.  It&#8217;s not often that I go for folksy acoustic singer-songwriter music, but something about </span><i><span class="Apple-style-span">The Wild Hunt</span></i><span class="Apple-style-span"> really jumped out at me in a way that an album like this rarely does.  I think Kristian Matsson&#8217;s voice is what really did it for me, which seemed to be the tipping point for most people in regards to his music.</span></span></span></span><br /><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"></span><br />
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">9. Sufjan Stevens &#8211; </span><i><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">The Age Of Adz</span></i></td>
<td width="150"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"><br /></span></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TSPdhYtHi_I/AAAAAAAAA9g/VniDS8R9srA/s1600/sufjan-stevens-age-of-adz-cover-art.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TSPdhYtHi_I/AAAAAAAAA9g/VniDS8R9srA/s200/sufjan-stevens-age-of-adz-cover-art.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"><span class="Apple-style-span">Probably among the most brash albums of the year, all coming from a musician usually known for his shy and reserved persona.  To be honest, I probably wouldn&#8217;t have given this album a second listen if it wasn&#8217;t for the fact that it was coming from the man responsible for </span><i><span class="Apple-style-span">Michigan</span></i><span class="Apple-style-span"> and </span><i><span class="Apple-style-span">Illinois</span></i><span class="Apple-style-span">, but it&#8217;s definitely an album that rewarded me for my patience.  There&#8217;s plenty of Stevens&#8217; warmth and tenderness beneath all the electronic fuzz that encompasses the album, and it all culminates in a stellar 25-minute rave-up jam that seems only fitting for an album of such ambitious personal reflection.</span></span></span></span><br /><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"><span class="Apple-style-span"></span></span></span></span><br /><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"><span class="Apple-style-span"></span></span></span></span><br /><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"><span class="Apple-style-span"></span></span></span></span><br /><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"><span class="Apple-style-span"><br />
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">8. Beach House &#8211; </span><i><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Teen Dream</span></i></td>
<td width="150"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"><br /></span></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p></span></span></span></span></div>
<div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TSPdb1HkX5I/AAAAAAAAA9c/eBmaBR2JuLY/s1600/beach-house-teen-dream.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TSPdb1HkX5I/AAAAAAAAA9c/eBmaBR2JuLY/s200/beach-house-teen-dream.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;">I think in my original review of Teen Dream I said that this isn&#8217;t the type of thing of thing that I usually listen to, but now that seems like a load of shit.  Sure it&#8217;s lush and atmospheric, but more than anything else the songs are superbly crafted and full of impenetrable beauty.  It&#8217;s an album that was easy for me to get lost in, and that&#8217;s not something I usually aim for in a piece of music.  So big ups to Beach House.</span></div>
<div>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">7. Vampire Weekend &#8211; <i>Contra</i></span></div>
<div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TSPdSjjWGVI/AAAAAAAAA9Y/6QUIl7mdm5g/s1600/Contra1.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TSPdSjjWGVI/AAAAAAAAA9Y/6QUIl7mdm5g/s200/Contra1.jpg" width="196" /></a></div>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;">Easily the most controversial album among Da Morgue writers, but one that easily had me on the pro-<i>Contra</i> side of the equation.  More or less, Vampire Weekend have made exactly what a follow-up to a great debut should sound like.  They build on all the plucky joy that was there in the first album, all while bringing out more of the diverse influences that seemed to be bubbling just beneath the surface.</span></span></span><br /><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px;"></span></span></span></span><br /><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"></span></span></span><br /><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"></span></span></span><br /><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"><br />
<table>
<tbody></tbody>
</table>
<p></span></span></span></div>
<div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px; font-size: x-large;">6. Best Coast &#8211; <i>Crazy For You</i></span>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TSPgyZuh3VI/AAAAAAAAA9o/83hYdthbhDc/s1600/best-coast-crazy-for-you-cover.1.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="198" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TSPgyZuh3VI/AAAAAAAAA9o/83hYdthbhDc/s200/best-coast-crazy-for-you-cover.1.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;">For me this album is pretty much the definition of ear candy, and yet I couldn&#8217;t help myself from falling for it on a deeper level.  Musically and lyrically, everything on <i>Crazy For You</i> sounds like the most naively simplistic love songs, but I think it&#8217;s in that simplicity that the album&#8217;s appeal lies.  Sometimes you need music like this to remind you that modern music doesn&#8217;t have to be cluttered with cutting edge self-consciousness, as there&#8217;s always plenty to be found in the simple pleasures of some lovely pop songs.</span></div>
<div>
<table style="text-align: left;">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="100%"><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">5. Arcade Fire &#8211; </span><i><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">The Suburbs</span></i></span></td>
<td width="150"><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TSPZlU1NU3I/AAAAAAAAA9A/n1dpnFA5y0c/s1600/arcade-fire-suburbs.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TSPZlU1NU3I/AAAAAAAAA9A/n1dpnFA5y0c/s200/arcade-fire-suburbs.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;">Arcade Fire have often struck as a band whose grandeur has always been their most apparent quality.  But the &#8220;sprawl&#8221;-ing nature of The Suburbs shows that there&#8217;s many sides to the band, and pretty much all of them are pretty damn impressive.  I don&#8217;t think I ever envisioned Arcade Fire as a band that I&#8217;d be continuing to be invested in as the years go by, but here I am talking about their third fantastic album in a row.  Here&#8217;s hoping to many more.</span></div>
<div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="text-align: auto;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">4. The Walkmen &#8211; </span><i><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Lisbon</span></i></span></div>
<div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TSPdE-dfREI/AAAAAAAAA9U/oSq0t4Iv4DY/s1600/the-walkmen-lisbon-0.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="177" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TSPdE-dfREI/AAAAAAAAA9U/oSq0t4Iv4DY/s200/the-walkmen-lisbon-0.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;">I feel like the time of year may have inflated the position of this album, as Lisbon has been the perfect &#8220;winter album&#8221; for me so far.  But either way, this is an album that has turned me into a Walkmen fan, and has reminded me again that an unpolished, minimalist approach to rock n&#8217; roll isn&#8217;t necessarily a bad thing.  Also, I have a hard time not loving an album that has something as morose and beautiful as &#8220;Stranded&#8221; as well as something as rip-roaringly awesome as &#8220;Angela Surf City&#8221;.</span><br /><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px;"></span></span><br /><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"></span><br /><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"></span><br /><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"><br />
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">3. LCD Soundsystem &#8211; </span><i><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">This Is Happening</span></i></td>
<td width="150"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"><br /></span></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p></span></div>
<div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TSPc4WWYxsI/AAAAAAAAA9Q/pIDCQ56t2Y0/s1600/lcd-soundsystem-this-is-happening-cover-art.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TSPc4WWYxsI/AAAAAAAAA9Q/pIDCQ56t2Y0/s200/lcd-soundsystem-this-is-happening-cover-art.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;">LCD Soundsystem, I hardly knew yee.  Just as I&#8217;m starting to get in to this band, James Murphy decides this&#8217;ll be his last album under the LCD moniker.  I&#8217;d probably be unhappy with this if it wasn&#8217;t for the fact that this album might be about as high a note as one could hope to go out on.  It&#8217;s a great culmination of the charmingly immature dance jams that marked the earlier LCD records, along with the more introspective tendencies that have marked Murphy&#8217;s more recent songs.  Having your cake and eating it too, now that&#8217;s a way to go out.</span></span></span></div>
<div>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">2. The National &#8211; </span><i><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">High Violet</span></i></td>
<td width="150"><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span"><br /></span></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TSPcxl7sxCI/AAAAAAAAA9M/IOg5tOLYPgM/s1600/The-National-High-Violet-3.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TSPcxl7sxCI/AAAAAAAAA9M/IOg5tOLYPgM/s200/The-National-High-Violet-3.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;">It&#8217;s easy to harp on a band that puts out three albums in a row that essentially have the same sonic approach to them.  It&#8217;s much harder to harp on a band that puts out a trilogy of albums that are as hauntingly beautiful, intricately executed, and weirdly relatable as <i>Alligator</i>, <i>Boxer</i>, and <i>High Violet</i>.  However, this doesn&#8217;t feel like a band merely rehashing their signature sound, but getting a better feel for it, and finding all sorts of different textures and nuances that can be applied to it.  Whether they decide to stay the course with this sound or tear it down, I&#8217;m certain whatever they do next will be something to look forward to.</span></span></span><br /><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"></span></span></span><br /><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"></span></span></span><br /><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"></span></span></span><br /><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"><br />
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">1. Titus Andronicus &#8211; </span><i><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">The Monitor</span></i></td>
<td width="150"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px; font-size: medium;"><br /></span></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p></span></span></span></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TSPcnaRG3xI/AAAAAAAAA9I/2aoG5b-m6Ug/s1600/Titus_andronicus_The_Monitor_album_cover_jpg.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TSPcnaRG3xI/AAAAAAAAA9I/2aoG5b-m6Ug/s200/Titus_andronicus_The_Monitor_album_cover_jpg.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;">It&#8217;s not often that a band you&#8217;ve never heard of comes out of no where and knocks you on your ass.  It&#8217;s even less often that it&#8217;s done with a garage/punk album filled with anthems about the New Jersey suburbs crossed with the Civil War, but that&#8217;s what <i>The Monitor</i> did for me.  I wouldn&#8217;t say it&#8217;s a perfect album by any measure.  Much like the war it was inspired by, it&#8217;s an epic, meandering, and bloody mess, but it&#8217;s a beautiful mess that had me truly engaged in it every time I listened to it.  2010 was a year in which a lot of my favorite albums tended to be generally larger in scope, but really nothing matched the ragged majesty or firey intensity of <i>The Monitor</i>.  </span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=822</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John&#8217;s Top Ten Albums of 2010</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=821</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=821#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Ten]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another year, another top ten list. Out of the 24 albums I heard this year, I discovered a barrel full of albums I liked, but not very many that I loved. Though there&#8217;s still a lot out there that I&#8217;m yet to check out, most notably the latest from Arcade Fire who I&#8217;ll give a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another year, another top ten list. Out of the 24 albums I heard this year, I discovered a barrel full of albums I liked, but not very many that I loved. Though there&#8217;s still a lot out there that I&#8217;m yet to check out, most notably the latest from <i>Arcade Fire</i> who I&#8217;ll give a chance someday and I&#8217;m sure there&#8217;s others. Anyhow, it was still a good year for me and music in general, so here&#8217;s my final ten in all it&#8217;s glory. </p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">10. Matt &amp; Kim &#8211; <i>Sidewalks</i></span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TSGJ2EAtLvI/AAAAAAAAB3w/pNZ1vniWQss/s1600/11-04-sidewalks-albumart_jpg_980x650_q85.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img alt="" border="0" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5557874977034546930" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TSGJ2EAtLvI/AAAAAAAAB3w/pNZ1vniWQss/s200/11-04-sidewalks-albumart_jpg_980x650_q85.jpg" style="cursor: pointer; float: left; height: 200px; margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; width: 200px;" /></a>Though the songs aren&#8217;t quite as memorable or the catchy as the tunes on the joyous <i>Grand</i>, key and drum duo Matt Johnson and Kim Schifino have really stepped up their game in the studio. Almost every track on <i>Sidewalks</i> sounds as big as the New York borough they hail from. I just wish there were more individual tracks that stood out but what it lacks in catchy singles it makes up for in grooves which will keep you movin&#8217; all day long.  </p>
<p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">9. The Drums &#8211; <i>The Drums</i></span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TSGKBxVD1BI/AAAAAAAAB34/KN4vxuAW3sk/s1600/The%2BDrums%2B2.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img alt="" border="0" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5557875178178073618" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TSGKBxVD1BI/AAAAAAAAB34/KN4vxuAW3sk/s200/The%2BDrums%2B2.jpg" style="cursor: pointer; float: left; height: 200px; margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; width: 200px;" /></a>From the moment I heard &#8220;Let&#8217;s Go Surfing&#8221; I was excited for this indie debut and for the most part it was worth the wait. I think it&#8217;s the approach more than anything that excites me here. Surf music with an 80s touch? Or is it 80s music with a Surf music touch? All I know is I&#8217;m digging the synths and dueling guitars with more beach twang than you could wave a board at. These guys have  really established an attractive sound without being derivative and punched out some poppy tunes along the way.</p>
<p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">8. Neil Young &#8211; <i>Le Noise</i></span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TSGKXEg9ufI/AAAAAAAAB4A/c5wBzXrqoM8/s1600/Le_Noise_Neil_Young.jpeg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"> <img alt="" border="0" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5557875544105531890" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TSGKXEg9ufI/AAAAAAAAB4A/c5wBzXrqoM8/s200/Le_Noise_Neil_Young.jpeg" style="cursor: pointer; float: left; height: 200px; margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; width: 200px;" /></a>Initially this wasn&#8217;t even going to crack my top ten, but somehow it became implanted into my brain like a distorted rock n&#8217; roll tumor. Now that&#8217;s a true testament to Neil&#8217;s presence, songwriting, and guitar playing as <i>Le Noise</i> is no more than Neil, a guitar, and the light touch of producer Daniel &#8220;Le Noise&#8221; Lanois. That&#8217;s all it is… And it hella rocks! Still I can only imagine how much more it could of rocked with ya know, like drums and bass. Though that doesn&#8217;t change the fact that these are great songs and Neil hasn&#8217;t lost any of his edge, it&#8217;s only evolved into Old Man angst. </p>
<p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">7. The National &#8211; <i>High Violet</i></span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TSGK6ILPRxI/AAAAAAAAB4I/zrO2Sfy4Q0E/s1600/the-national_high-violet.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"> <img alt="" border="0" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5557876146383570706" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TSGK6ILPRxI/AAAAAAAAB4I/zrO2Sfy4Q0E/s200/the-national_high-violet.jpg" style="cursor: pointer; float: left; height: 200px; margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; width: 200px;" /></a>It&#8217;s been a gradual process, but I&#8217;ve finally come to appreciate the sleepy allure of <i>The National</i>. Seriously that guy really needs to get some sleep, but I suppose that&#8217;s what makes <i>The National</i> well, <i>The National</i>. It&#8217;s meaningful and emotional music with a kind of sophistication that remarkably feels genuine. You could go on with all that kind of over analysis, but really it&#8217;s just music that feels vey honest and soulful and I find that very appealing.  </p>
<p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">6. Happy Birthday &#8211; <i>Happy Birthday</i></span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TSIdXpj-CcI/AAAAAAAAB4g/bYedJ5JG49M/s1600/happyb.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img alt="" border="0" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5558037182259530178" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TSIdXpj-CcI/AAAAAAAAB4g/bYedJ5JG49M/s200/happyb.jpg" style="cursor: pointer; float: left; height: 200px; margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; width: 200px;" /></a>The fact that I even found about this band is pure luck. I was just randomly flipping through radio stations one day when somehow, I stumbled across the delightfully catchy &#8220;Girls FM&#8221;. I don&#8217;t remember what station it was and haven&#8217;t heard it on the radio since, so if it wasn&#8217;t for that moment I may have never found about this punchy pop/punk trio. The album is essentially a blender of melodic pop and  whiny garage rock, but it grows on you and I&#8217;m really glad I discovered this little rock nugget. </p>
<p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">5. Spoon &#8211; <i>Transference</i></span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TSIdJxBZVmI/AAAAAAAAB4Y/K7AXoXfj-G8/s1600/SpoonTransference.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img alt="" border="0" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5558036943743833698" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TSIdJxBZVmI/AAAAAAAAB4Y/K7AXoXfj-G8/s200/SpoonTransference.jpg" style="cursor: pointer; float: left; height: 200px; margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; width: 200px;" /></a>Seeing that it would be darn near impossible to replicate the awesomeness of <i>Ga Ga Ga Ga Ga</i>, <i>Spoon</i> returns to more familiar territory with <i>Transference</i>. Meaning it&#8217;s more of <i> Spoon&#8217;s</i> trademark, unconventional rock approached in the most basic way possible and I&#8217;m always down for that. Not to mention the sheer rawness accompanied by the presence of  Britt Daniels (One of my favorite vocalists in modern rock) always gives me chills. If You&#8217;re not much of a <i>Spoon</i> fan this probably wont win you over, but it you are pump it up. </p>
<p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">4. The Black Keys &#8211; <i>Brothers</i></span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TSId6bLeHVI/AAAAAAAAB4o/nGu2jPuy4lA/s1600/the-black-keys-brothers.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img alt="" border="0" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5558037779694099794" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TSId6bLeHVI/AAAAAAAAB4o/nGu2jPuy4lA/s200/the-black-keys-brothers.jpg" style="cursor: pointer; float: left; height: 199px; margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; width: 200px;" /></a>What a year for <i>The Black Keys</i> with the release of their most successful and arguably best album yet. I feel like I can&#8217;t even flip on the TV without seeing one of their bluesy tunes in some kind of commercial (Usually ones about trucks). The sound is bigger, the riffs are infectious, and these new tunes just might be their best yet. It rocks, it&#8217;s funky, it&#8217;s bluesy and it&#8217;s full on primal emotion.  I think it helped that they expanded their sound beyond just drum and guitar and I pray they continue this approach. I wish I could make it higher but my final three is in my eyes, too damn solid. </p>
<p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">3. LCD Soundsystem &#8211; <i>This is Happening</i></span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TSIePk_FvzI/AAAAAAAAB4w/AjpKLpHRnFE/s1600/lcd_soundsystem_this_is_happening_album_cover_300x300.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img alt="" border="0" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5558038143103778610" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TSIePk_FvzI/AAAAAAAAB4w/AjpKLpHRnFE/s200/lcd_soundsystem_this_is_happening_album_cover_300x300.jpg" style="cursor: pointer; float: left; height: 200px; margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; width: 200px;" /></a>What I love about James Murphy, is it&#8217;s like he&#8217;s a rock and roller working in the Electronic medium, resulting in Electro/Pop that sounds like no other. From the slow, building, synth of the eight minute &#8220;Dance Yrself Clean&#8221; I was hooked and here I am as someone who usually doesn&#8217;t care for long songs. Whether it&#8217;s a 3 minute or 10 minute song, James Murphy always finds ways to keep it fresh and exciting, it&#8217;s too bad I didn&#8217;t give him a listen until so late in the game. </p>
<p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">2. Vampire Weekend &#8211; <i>Contra</i></span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TSIeX1kbAOI/AAAAAAAAB44/QZnfB3Ou58w/s1600/Vampire-Weekend-Contra-314x314.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img alt="" border="0" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5558038284994281698" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TSIeX1kbAOI/AAAAAAAAB44/QZnfB3Ou58w/s200/Vampire-Weekend-Contra-314x314.jpg" style="cursor: pointer; float: left; height: 200px; margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; width: 200px;" /></a>I didn&#8217;t know how this preppy pop group would be able follow up their smash debut, but by golly, they found away. So here we have it, another worldly rock record that even treads electronic waters and stays afloat. As far as I&#8217;m concerned, it&#8217;s the absolute, best followup anyone could of asked for and from here on, I think we can look forward to many, many, years of this group producing great music. </p>
<p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">1. MGMT &#8211; <i>Congratulations</i></span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TSIejo_2PCI/AAAAAAAAB5A/yVesoyqSQ-8/s1600/MGMT-congratulations-cover.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img alt="" border="0" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5558038487778081826" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TSIejo_2PCI/AAAAAAAAB5A/yVesoyqSQ-8/s200/MGMT-congratulations-cover.jpg" style="cursor: pointer; float: left; height: 200px; margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; width: 200px;" /></a>Perhaps one of the most misunderstood albums of the year. I mean critics liked it well enough, but there seemed to be an outcry from listeners that felt alienated. As for me, I get it, and I love it. Such a bold and daring move for a still relatively new band, I applaud the experiment, but really it&#8217;s the quality of the music that makes it such a proud achievement. I think I described it in my original review as, &#8220;Like if The Flaming Lips and The Beach Boys had an orgy.&#8221; A statement that I still wholeheartedly stand by. Like a psychedelic surfs up across unknown rock waters, or whatever the hell that means, <i>Congratulations</i> is a delightful enigma. Perhaps the fact that this album is so hard to describe maybe one the reasons I love it so. </p>
<p><b>Honorable Mention</b></p>
<p><b>She &amp; Him &#8211; Volume 2:</b> There are some great old school pop tracks on this second collaboration between actress/musician Zooey Deschanel and musican/producer M. Ward. It almost has a similar sway  to the songs of Roy Orbison, unfortunately it loses some pep as the album descends into sleepy ballads.</p>
<p><b> The New Pornographers &#8211; Together:</b> This was originally my number ten until I realized I never actually listened to the whole thing. It&#8217;s good, but I kind of need to uh, listen to it first before I come to a conclusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=821</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>R.I.P. Pete Postlethwaite</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=820</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=820#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pete Postlethwaite1946-2011This is so tragic considering the fact that Pete Postlethwaite was still working so steadily and he was only 64. I didn&#8217;t even know he had cancer, but sadly he succumbed to it on January 2nd. A highly skilled actor of both stage and screen, Pete Postlethwaite&#8217;s was a consummate pro no matter how [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TSIbOlSq9DI/AAAAAAAAB4Q/8P28RrNiP_g/s1600/pete-postlethwaite-0.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 240px; height: 320px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TSIbOlSq9DI/AAAAAAAAB4Q/8P28RrNiP_g/s320/pete-postlethwaite-0.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5558034827471156274" /></a><br /><b>Pete Postlethwaite<br />1946-2011</b><br />This is so tragic considering the fact that Pete Postlethwaite was still working so steadily and he was only 64. I didn&#8217;t even know he had cancer, but sadly he succumbed to it on January 2nd. A highly skilled actor of both stage and screen, Pete Postlethwaite&#8217;s was a consummate pro no matter how big his role. With his cracked and wrinkled face, he was adept at playing villains or even emotionally distraught characters with the flick of a switch. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll always remember him for what will probably go down as his best role, playing Daniel Day-Lewis&#8217; father in the emotional drama <i>In the Name of the Father</i>. Though Postlethwaite was no stranger to other genres, other notable roles include; <i>The Usual Suspects</i>, <i>The Lost World: Jurassic Park</i>, <i>Amistad</i>, <i>The Constant Gardener</i>, and most recently <i>The Town</i> and <i>Inception</i>. It kind of freaks me out that I just watched <i>Inception</i> and all Postlethwaite&#8217;s character does in it is die, that will always be chilling for me now. </p>
<p>Even in less than spectacular films like <i>Alien 3</i> and <i>The Clash of the Titans (2010</i>, Postlethwaite was fun to watch, it didn&#8217;t matter what movie he was in, he always brought his best stuff and I will miss that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=820</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Welcome 2011!</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=819</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=819#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 19:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From all of us here at Damorgue, welcome to the year 2011! As we celebrate today as a beginning of a new year and decade, as well as a palindrome (1.1.11), I have calculated some statistics regarding Damorgue last year. 2010 was a busy year for Damorgue; we posted a whopping 262 posts, just 103 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From all of us here at Damorgue, welcome to the year 2011!  As we celebrate today as a beginning of a new year and decade, as well as a palindrome (1.1.11), I have calculated some statistics regarding Damorgue last year.  2010 was a busy year for Damorgue; we posted a whopping 262 posts, just 103 shy from one for every day of the year.  As for individual posts, John published the most with 128 entries.  Shortly behind was Sean with 76 posts.  Colin kept a steady pace with 41 posts in 2010.  Nancy was able to contribute 15 posts to the blog, while our newest member, Kevin just barely got in 2.  It will be interesting to see how the count changes next year!  The longest by day consecutive post streak for Damorgue stretched 39 posts from 24th of September to the 2nd of November.  Within that, John receives the award for longest consecutive posts from a single author at 9 posts stretching the 7th of October to the 15th for his impressive Shocktober series.  The people’s choice award, meaning most comments is awarded to the post “T3: Guilty Pleasures Part Deux” by John that pulled in 7 comments.  Sean produces the most feedback for his controversial posts with 83% of posts receiving comments.  Themed posts of 2010 included 80’s week, Shocktober, 2010 recaps, Seattle International Film Festival, Top Ten Movies of 2009, Top Ten Movies of 2000&#8242;s, and the introduction of Dapodcasket.  2010 was filled of greatness, we hope that 2011 brings even more!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=819</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Ten Aviation Events of 2010</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=818</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=818#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 07:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Ten]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let us reflect back on aviation events of 2010. These are the top ten aviation happenings by media coverage over the past year. 10. Does it Really Exist?One of the biggest aviation feats of this year occurred without anyone really knowing. The United States Air Force, with help from Boeing and Nasa built a fully [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let us reflect back on aviation events of 2010.  These are the top ten aviation happenings by media coverage over the past year. </p>
<p><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_-8WxeU1zX_g/TR7ahBQ8dBI/AAAAAAAAAM4/yyyN4tJ5kMA/s1600/shuttle.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="224" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_-8WxeU1zX_g/TR7ahBQ8dBI/AAAAAAAAAM4/yyyN4tJ5kMA/s320/shuttle.jpg" width="320" /></a><b>10. Does it Really Exist?</b><br />One of the biggest aviation feats of this year occurred without anyone really knowing.  The United States Air Force, with help from Boeing and Nasa built a fully automated, robot shuttle.  They launched the shuttle into space in August and it returned to Earth, landing at Edwards Air Force Base in late November.  For the four months that the shuttle was in orbit, without civilians knowing about it, the craft completed multiple tests and airworthiness directives.  When it landed, the Air Force did release a photo and a small article about the vehicle.  Little specifics still have yet to be known, but the shuttle is going to be used for ‘cargo’ missions and will remain an entirely lifeless operation.  This shuttle, though so covert, shows the marvel in 2010 engineering, not only can we fly to space but we can do it completely from a computer screen on the ground.  Space colonization is near.  </p>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_-8WxeU1zX_g/TR7agKgw6yI/AAAAAAAAAMs/T1xrljGj6-M/s1600/pilot+license.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_-8WxeU1zX_g/TR7agKgw6yI/AAAAAAAAAMs/T1xrljGj6-M/s200/pilot+license.jpg" width="150" /></a></div>
<p><b>9. A New form of Identification</b><br />In a world where the fear of an aircraft attack is omnipresent, it’s a wonder why pilot’s never had a picture on their actual license.  As it stands now, to act as a pilot in command of an airplane, the pilot is required to carry (among other supplies) there FAA license, a picture id, and current medical certificate.  The license though just has a few words, explaining the pilot’s certifications, and on the back lays a picture of Orville and Wilbur Wright, but no photo of your own.  Recently however, the Federal Aviation Administration has begun implementing a two year process to put a picture and biometric identification on the license itself.  This is exciting especially amongst the pilot community because now Pilot’s will be able to use their license as a form of government issued id.</p>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_-8WxeU1zX_g/TR7af14ryVI/AAAAAAAAAMo/DaTCKq3vHhg/s1600/nasa.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="263" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_-8WxeU1zX_g/TR7af14ryVI/AAAAAAAAAMo/DaTCKq3vHhg/s320/nasa.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<p><b>8. The Fate of Nasa</b><br />The National Aeronautical and Space Administration was created during the Kennedy presidency to complete a simple mission: put a man on the moon.  From its inception in the fifties, NASA has grown into a huge organization under the federal executive branch.  In fact, over 1% of national spending annually is spent on NASA.  Look at all the accomplishments though; several missions to the moon, telescopic satellites that have traveled the planets charting and sending back information, in fact, the Voyager Space craft is over ten billion miles from our planet and will shortly exit the solar system.  These are just some of the major projects of numerous that NASA has worked on over the years.  Unfortunately, during this recession, President Obama has made the decision to privatize the space market and drastically cut back the NASA space program.  Note that NASA will still be the chief administrator of air and space in this country, but will not be doing everything from start to finish.  Only three shuttle missions remain, with the last scheduled to launch in February, meaning that the shuttle program will probably be over by summer of next year.  It’s too bad that such an accomplished organization has to go through such drastic change.  One of the biggest impacts may be on America’s children.  When I was growing up, the astronauts and NASA were such an inspirational image that tomorrow’s generation won’t get.  Some hope still exists for space exploration, Space X, one of multiple private organizations that are now trying to fill in NASA’s developing gap, successfully launched a rocket into orbit three weeks ago.  The rocket will be used in future years under contract from NASA to transport astronauts to the world’s most expensive single item: the international space station.           </p>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_-8WxeU1zX_g/TR7aekyWHrI/AAAAAAAAAMY/ZrI3P-3oRPQ/s1600/alaska.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="203" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_-8WxeU1zX_g/TR7aekyWHrI/AAAAAAAAAMY/ZrI3P-3oRPQ/s320/alaska.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<p><b>7. Not all Airlines Suffer</b><br />In time of recession and demise, the airlines are not expected to be doing well.  Higher fuel costs and lower passenger travel combined with aging aircraft have created a tough time the airlines.  The industry has coped with this by hurting the passenger; less service, more charges, and least helpful, more expensive fares.  Within this economic sector, however, there is jewel.  Seattle based Alaska Airlines has completed its most profitable year since the company began operations over thirty years ago.  Alaska, one of few airlines that remain distant from one of three global alliances, serves primarily the west coast of the United States and the state of Alaska.  In 2007, Alaska began its first flights to Hawaii from its hub in Seattle, and today it offers the most flights to Hawaii behind only Hawaiian Airlines.  Alaska has also expanded its route network to many east coast cities from Anchorage, Seattle, or Los Angeles, the airlines largest hubs.  Currently, Alaska has a stock price around $52.00 a share, one of the highest in the industry.  Speculation exists whether or not Alaska will be absorbed by one of the larger, remaining legacy carriers, however Alaska, with its unique route map and high stock price, the airline will likely remain independent for a long time.  Hopefully the success of Alaska this year will spread to other airlines in the domestic industry.  </p>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_-8WxeU1zX_g/TR7bqleDWLI/AAAAAAAAAM8/GDIHsGREsS4/s1600/boeing+2.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="243" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_-8WxeU1zX_g/TR7bqleDWLI/AAAAAAAAAM8/GDIHsGREsS4/s320/boeing+2.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<p><b>6. Boeing: Hope and Failure</b><br />Boeing, the country’s largest exporter and industries largest company, has been in the news quite a bit over the last few years, especially in negative nature.  The 787, which after a three year delay finally took its first flight in November of 2009, with hopes of a delivery in late 2010.  The flight test program for the new aircraft, which has spanned all this year, has gradually declined ending with a fire in one of the test airplanes last month, grounding the fleet.  The electric panel that caused the fire has been found and fixed, but, at the expense of yet another delay to the programs first commercial delivery.  As of now, first delivery is expected for late 2011, but I personally expect no deliveries until 2012.  Despite the 787’s failure, the company as a whole remains in good shape.  The next generation of the 747, the -8 freighter and -8 intercontinental both accomplished their first flights this year and are expected to enter service next year, on schedule.     </p>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_-8WxeU1zX_g/TR7b1ll6s3I/AAAAAAAAANA/MC2QKBcr4cQ/s1600/rols.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="215" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_-8WxeU1zX_g/TR7b1ll6s3I/AAAAAAAAANA/MC2QKBcr4cQ/s320/rols.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<p><b>5. Rolls Royce: Whoops</b><br />Air Transportation is the safest way to get from place to place, but it is not immune to accidents.  The biggest aircraft accident of this year has to be Qantas A380 enroute to Sydney that had to return to Singapore shortly after takeoff because of an engine failure last November.  The inboard engine on the left wing, a Rolls Royce Trent 1000, encountered an oil pressure failure within the core of the engine which led to the engine blowing up and sending shards everywhere.  A two foot hole even ripped straight through that wing of the aircraft.  This catastrophic failure wasn’t able to take any lives as a qualified crew brought the damaged plane back to Singapore and got it on the ground, safely.  Qantas has since grounded all of its A380 fleet and have put their 747-400’s on the routes formerly flown by the airplane.  Airbus and Rolls Royce have actively been searching for a solution to the problems.  The first being solely with Rolls Royce and the engine exploding.  The second came as a sort of surprise to EADS subsidiary Airbus seeing that the aircraft underwent significant damage because of the failure.  The Trent series engines are used throughout different aircrafts and airlines, including some Boeing products such as the new 787.  The British engine manufacture, Rolls Royce’s stock prices tanked after the event and have yet to recover.  This event revealed weakness in aircraft design but also a promising resolution with an excellent flight crew.      </p>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_-8WxeU1zX_g/TR7cBqpyx2I/AAAAAAAAANE/vA80szECXAg/s1600/merger+2.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="205" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_-8WxeU1zX_g/TR7cBqpyx2I/AAAAAAAAANE/vA80szECXAg/s320/merger+2.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<p><b>4. Smaller Skies</b><br />Airline mergers in no way should be considered as new news.  Successful airline mergers however, have become virtually unheard of, until now.  The year began with the completion of the Northwest merger with Delta airlines, forming the world’s largest airline.  Planning and plenty of time for preparation can be thanked for allowing such a smooth transition.  This merger is considered successful not just for the quality of integration but the fact that Delta reported making a profit again, something the airline hasn’t accomplished since the recession.  Since the Delta merger went so well, United and Southwest Airlines decided to jump on the merger plane, too.  This summer, United announced plans to acquire Continental Airlines, and in October the Department of Transportation approved the merger. This merger combined two larger airlines with routes and aircraft less complimentary then the Delta and Northwest merger.  In addition, the airlines took two okay liveries and combined to make one that looks pretty stupid.  Since the plane needs to be repainted anyway, they should have made a whole new livery.  Another surprise this year that has gotten plenty of press coverage was budget carrier, Southwest Airline’s decision to purchase Air Tran, another low-cost model operator.  This acquisition is probably the most exciting of the three mergers of this year.  First, it will add international routes and Air Trans heavy east coast presence to Southwest.  Also, for the first time in the company’s history, it will operate an aircraft type other than the 737, choosing to continue operation of Air Tran’s 717 fleet.  The massive expansion for Southwest will put even more pressure on the other airlines to keep fares low, overall helping the customer.  Though mergers are great for the airlines, they typically raise ticket prices, but, this Southwest one should help keep prices down.  In a time of efficiency the airlines look to mergers as a good opportunity, thus far recent mergers have been much more successful than the American absorption of Trans World Airlines earlier this decade that almost pushed the airline into bankruptcy.          </p>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_-8WxeU1zX_g/TR7ae_8QyOI/AAAAAAAAAMc/2yBmB0Eqna8/s1600/fedex.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="219" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_-8WxeU1zX_g/TR7ae_8QyOI/AAAAAAAAAMc/2yBmB0Eqna8/s320/fedex.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<p><b>3. Failed Bombings</b><br />In passenger travel, essentially every piece of baggage as well as every person must be scanned and checked for explosive and dangerous material.  The cargo market however remains relatively open, with little screening of the cargo before the flight.  This September and October the Middle East released its newest forms of terrorist plots by placing explosive material on cargo aircraft with intention to explode the aircraft over United States soil.  Two Federal Express flights originating in the Middle East, with layovers in England, were discovered to have explosives on board in disguise as printer toner cartridges.  In an act not really known by the public, international intelligence was able to identify the packages before the planes reached U.S. land and disable them.  The origin of the packages remains unknown.  A United Parcel Service 747 that exploded over Dubai this summer might have been the result of a hidden explosive.  I formally request that the terrorists leave air travel alone, I take these attacks personally.</p>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_-8WxeU1zX_g/TR7afCPgYuI/AAAAAAAAAMg/hVl035k2BII/s1600/iceland+volcano.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="211" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_-8WxeU1zX_g/TR7afCPgYuI/AAAAAAAAAMg/hVl035k2BII/s320/iceland+volcano.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<p><b>2. Holy Ash!</b><br />Behind the oil spill, nothing packed the news more this summer than the eruption of Mount Eyjafjallajoekull in Iceland.  The ash from the volcano spewed into the atmosphere and traveled throughout the atmosphere of the North Atlantic.  Canceling thousands of flights over the course of weeks, nothing took a larger toll on the airlines this year.  Ash, carrying thick heavy sediment, gets sucked into the aircraft’s jet engine, becoming the equivalent of glue, killing the engine.  Ash from a volcano in Alaska caused a British Airways 747 to temporarily lose all of its engines a few years ago.  Eventually, the ash cleared and the flights were able to fly again.  The impact though was catastrophic, causing delays lasting nearly a month long on some passengers.     </p>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_-8WxeU1zX_g/TR7ag9GQQlI/AAAAAAAAAM0/n3Wok_1mhoY/s1600/scanner.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="270" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_-8WxeU1zX_g/TR7ag9GQQlI/AAAAAAAAAM0/n3Wok_1mhoY/s320/scanner.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<p><b>1. &#8220;You touch my junk; you’ll have a law suit!”</b><br />As touched on earlier, security screening of the passengers has become a necessary and now unpleasant task.  In response to last year’s Christmas Day underpants bomber, the Transportation Security Administration implemented the use of full-body scanners at the top 100 airports of the United States.  Using either back-scatter or low-level x-rays, the body scanners produce a digital image of the individual, head to toe, revealing everything on the person.  The scanners are extremely effective but a pretty big change from the metal detector.  Time for example is one of those factors.  Instead of walking through a metal detector in a few seconds, the full body scanners take about 20 seconds or more per person.  Privacy though has become the biggest issue.  These scanners, producing a full image of you naked, are revealed to a TSA agent in another room that analyzes the image.  It has been described as virtual porn.  Not to mention, the scanners do send a little radiation into your body, so gentlemen, protect them testes.  Now if you don’t want to get your body scanned, you get an even worse and more invasive, full-body grouping, I mean search that has been described as demoralizing.  Since their implementation, the scanners have got a ton of press coverage, especially after a person in San Diego filmed the entire process of him being kicked out of the airport because he didn&#8217;t want to be scanned on his iphone.  The position of the TSA to keep the skies safe is understandable, but I don’t feel that air transportation is at a point that requires a strip search, virtual or real, for every passenger.  The TSA has seemed to quell coverage on the scanners, perhaps considering other options.  </p>
<p>Well there you have it.  These events are the biggest of 2010, for more information on any aviation matter, I recommend airliners.net and aopa.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=818</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Ten Video Games of 2010</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=817</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=817#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 00:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Ten]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As another year comes to a close it&#8217;s time to look back at the media that helped us get through it and will remind us of it in the distant future. This was meant to be the first week of a three week event, although Nancy seems to busy to post and Kevin is having [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As another year comes to a close it&#8217;s time to look back at the media that helped us get through it and will remind us of it in the distant future. This was meant to be the first week of a three week event, although Nancy seems to busy to post and Kevin is having his own troubles. Regardless, look for music next week and movies the week after that.</p>
<p>2010 was an interesting year for games, with a really spread out release calendar. Usually I have to wait for November to play my most anticipated games, but it seemed like there was a big release coming out every month right up until December, which, as we all know, is too late in the year for anyone to release anything good.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">10. <i>God of War III</i></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TR5EXvGlmZI/AAAAAAAAA70/orlUioFCbWU/s1600/God_of_War_III_not_final_art.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TR5EXvGlmZI/AAAAAAAAA70/orlUioFCbWU/s200/God_of_War_III_not_final_art.jpg" width="173" /></a></div>
<p>The number 10 spot is always a tricky one. Do I reward a franchise for reinventing itself (<i>Splinter Cell: Conviction</i>)? Do I single out an amazingly fun, but stupid game (<i>Just Cause 2</i>)? Do I talk about some of the great downloadable games that came out this past year (<i>Pac-Man CE DX</i>,&nbsp;<i>Limbo</i>,&nbsp;<i>Super Meat Boy</i>)? How about one of the most competent games of the year instead? Kratos is angry, and so he&#8217;s going to kill everybody. That seems to be the entire plot of <i>God of War III</i>, which picks up right after the second game and then kicks our &#8220;hero&#8221; around enough that he just doesn&#8217;t seem to care anymore. Kill the Gods, kill the Titans, kill the innocent people caught in-between. And enjoy some&nbsp;exceptionally&nbsp;pretty visuals and solid combat along the way. You could complain about the weapons being too similar or other unessential nitpicks, but at the end of the day I enjoyed putting an end to a story that started back while I was still in high school.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">9. <i>Heavy Rain</i></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TR49Ipe7u4I/AAAAAAAAA7c/vIdRkso6Mm4/s1600/Heavy_Rain_Cover_Art.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TR49Ipe7u4I/AAAAAAAAA7c/vIdRkso6Mm4/s200/Heavy_Rain_Cover_Art.jpg" width="173" /></a></div>
<p><i>Heavy Rain </i>is not a great movie or work of fiction, but it&#8217;s one hell of a compelling gaming experience that sticks with you like glue from outer space. I can&#8217;t think of any title before this one that worked so hard at making you care about the characters you play as, making you experience the&nbsp;minutia&nbsp;of their lives. While not all of that pays off in the end, what does work works really well, and in a way no one has seen before. Sure, it&#8217;s easy to laugh at the ridiculous accents and some of the moments can be ruined by silly gamers, but can you think of anything as thrilling as the segment driving on the freeway in the wrong direction? The finger chopping scene? The murder? Did you even get those moments? Was my experience totally different from yours? It probably was, and that&#8217;s another reason why <i>Heavy Rain </i>is a game that helped make 2010 worth remembering.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">8. <i>Bayonetta</i></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div style="margin: 0px;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TR49tUHCbXI/AAAAAAAAA7g/2Cxv2OuEeQU/s1600/Bayonetta_Box_Art.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TR49tUHCbXI/AAAAAAAAA7g/2Cxv2OuEeQU/s200/Bayonetta_Box_Art.jpg" width="176" /></a></div>
<p>I really liked that first <i>Devil May Cry</i>. The third one was good too. The fourth one was alright, I guess. But this new game, <i>Bayonetta</i>, well, that&#8217;s something special. She&#8217;s a hyper-sexualized witch/stripper/librarian on a journey of revenge and self-discovery, but the why doesn&#8217;t really matter. What does matter is that Bayonetta kicks some stylish ass, and then shoots it, and the cuts it with a sword. Watching <i>Bayonetta </i>play out was among the most mind-boggling&nbsp;experience I&#8217;ve had, and that&#8217;s not a bad thing. I mean, where else but in video games do you get to see a woman turn her skin-tight leather suit, which is actually made of her hair, into a giagantic demon dog head that goes on to devour a spear wielding angel monster while said lady does sexy dance moves on rubble falling a seemingly infinite height? Where, I ask you.</div>
<p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">7. <i>Rock Band 3</i></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div style="margin: 0px;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TR4-Zt1WMmI/AAAAAAAAA7k/nIdQ62RDLZ0/s1600/Rb3_box_art.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TR4-Zt1WMmI/AAAAAAAAA7k/nIdQ62RDLZ0/s200/Rb3_box_art.jpg" width="160" /></a></div>
<p>And so the music genre of video games comes to an end, not with a whimper but with a glorious chorus of keyboards and vocal harmonies. <i>Rock Band 3 </i>is the logical&nbsp;conclusion&nbsp;of this legendary franchise, which not only adds a new instrument but modes to actually teach people to play their instruments all by themselves. Learning a new instrument for the game is an experience we haven&#8217;t had in years and while it has been a struggle it has also been a lot of fun and somehow a little bit nostalgic. The UI makes all the necessary improvements and of course you can play all the songs in your massive song library. I just wish I didn&#8217;t have to buy songs all over again. Now that Harmonix is independent again, I hope the can just go on making DLC for, I don&#8217;t know, the rest of my life.</div>
<p>
<table>
<tr>
<td width="100%"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">6. <i>Assassin&#8217;s Creed: Brotherhood</i></span></td>
</tr>
</table>
<div style="margin: 0px;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TQVsC8C07eI/AAAAAAAAA7I/HNxbokFGfKo/s1600/Assassins_Creed_brotherhood_cover.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TQVsC8C07eI/AAAAAAAAA7I/HNxbokFGfKo/s200/Assassins_Creed_brotherhood_cover.jpg" width="151" /></a></div>
<p><i>Assassin&#8217;s Creed II </i>was a helluva game. <i>Brotherhood </i>is better. The Desmond stuff is better than it has ever been, actually turning the rag-tag crew of futuristic assassins into people I didn&#8217;t mind talking with and rooting for. Ezio is just as badass as ever, taking up the mantle of leadership in the assassin&#8217;s guild of Renaissance Italy. Rome is an amazing city to run around and kill people in. Ubisoft has gone so far from the first title in the series. Earlier complaints of repetition have been destroyed by a robust collection of addictive sidequests and the sheer number of collectibles hidden all over the city. Plus, what other game let&#8217;s you hang out with Da Vinci and Machiavelli&nbsp;in-between&nbsp;murder sessions? It&#8217;s even got multiplayer that is actually pretty fun and is being supported by free DLC, or as I like to call it &#8220;free-LC.&#8221; That sounds better when said than when written.</div>
<p>
<table>
<tr>
<td width="100%"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">5. <i>StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty</i></span></td>
</tr>
</table>
<div style="margin: 0px;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TG5aF2-BfdI/AAAAAAAAA4g/5900VFpCQXE/s1600/StarCraft_II_-_Box_Art.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TG5aF2-BfdI/AAAAAAAAA4g/5900VFpCQXE/s200/StarCraft_II_-_Box_Art.jpg" width="140" /></a></div>
<p>&#8220;Hell, it&#8217;s about time.&#8221; One of the most anticipated games in recent memory finally made it to store shelves this summer, and has become a fact of life for gamers all over the world since then. While I&#8217;ll never be good enough to truly enjoy what most people come to <i>StarCraft II </i>to play, spending more than a month going through the singleplayer&nbsp;campaign, the&nbsp;ingenious&nbsp;challenge mode and even a few matches with friends made it totally clear that this is a landmark game. It&#8217;s also the most watchable game I&#8217;ve ever seen, as I&#8217;ve probably spent more time watching matches on YouTube and uSteam than actually playing <i>StarCraft II </i>at this point. Yeah, that&#8217;s right, I&#8217;m talking about eSports. Deal with it. South Korea&#8217;s cool with them, why can&#8217;t I be? Watching pro-level <i>StarCraft II </i>is like watching professional 3D chess in fast forward, but with blood.</div>
<p>
<table>
<tr>
<td width="100%"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">4. <i>World of Warcraft: Cataclysm</i></span></td>
</tr>
</table>
<div style="margin: 0px;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TR5Aed0tgXI/AAAAAAAAA7o/Q2DkJsF4wUc/s1600/Cataclysm_Cover_Art.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TR5Aed0tgXI/AAAAAAAAA7o/Q2DkJsF4wUc/s200/Cataclysm_Cover_Art.png" width="141" /></a></div>
<p>As soon as I got to fly in the <i>Burning Crusade </i>expansion, I&#8217;ve been waiting to fly in Azeroth proper. &#8220;But we&#8217;d have to remake the world,&#8221; Blizzard said. &#8220;So do it, you makes crazy money every month,&#8221; I said. So they did. And <i>Cataclysm </i>is the best work they&#8217;ve ever done. Questing is crazy fun, the new races are great and while the level 85 cap is dumb, thinks are looking bright for the endgame as well. I genuinely enjoyed watching my druid gain tens of thousands of HP as he gained those last five levels, and the simplified talent trees allowed me to actually build my spec on my own instead of looking up a guide on the Internet (which I probably should have done). Blizzard has definitely reshaped the game to be simpler, more fun, and yet more tactical and skill-based than ever before. There&#8217;s never been a better time to hop into the <i>World of Wacraft.</i></div>
<p>
<table>
<tr>
<td width="100%"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">3.&nbsp;<i>Halo: Reach</i></span></td>
</tr>
</table>
<div style="margin: 0px;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TJO2cpcVefI/AAAAAAAAA5I/AtmerLl2LHA/s1600/Halo-_Reach_box_art.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TJO2cpcVefI/AAAAAAAAA5I/AtmerLl2LHA/s200/Halo-_Reach_box_art.png" width="156" /></a></div>
<p>The beloved <i>Halo </i>franchise bids farewell to its creator with <i>Reach</i>, the best game in the franchise. I know that&#8217;s kind of hard to&nbsp;swallow, what with Master Chief being sidelined in favor of dudes and a lady we&#8217;ve never met before, but the concept of a planet being taken over by aliens while humanity desperately tries to fight back, and later simply&nbsp;survive, is more compelling than the&nbsp;intergalactic&nbsp;stories we&#8217;re used too. It helps that we dealt with a much smaller cast of characters who were more willing to take off their helmets and let you get to know them. But now they&#8217;re dead. Plus space battles, jet packs and the most robust multiplayer suite&nbsp;thus far, with all sorts of great armor customization, gameplay mode flexibility and even the Forgeworld, a land you can alter any way you wish. This is the definitive <i>Halo </i>experience, and my current online FPS of choice.</div>
<p>
<table>
<tr>
<td width="100%"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">2.&nbsp;<i>Red Dead Redemption</i></span></td>
</tr>
</table>
<div style="margin: 0px;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TR5CQH7VnCI/AAAAAAAAA7s/2iUurW8G4yQ/s1600/Red_Dead_Redemption.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TR5CQH7VnCI/AAAAAAAAA7s/2iUurW8G4yQ/s200/Red_Dead_Redemption.jpg" width="166" /></a></div>
<p>Cowboy&#8217;s never got their just reward in video games. Every once in a while, someone would take a shot at the old west, but it never quite paid off. Rockstar changed that with <i>Red Dead Redemption</i>, which is not only the best cowboy game ever, but possibly the best game the studio has ever put out. John Marsten is a tremendous character to play as, and his version of the old west is fully realized. This is simply one of the best stories I&#8217;ve ever played, with a remarkable cast and a satisfying series of endings that delivers a profound sense of closure. It&#8217;s also worth pointing out that this amazingly robust game also includes a complete mutliplayer package that I hear is a lot of fun, but haven&#8217;t touched myself. There&#8217;s so much to do, to see, to experience in <i>Red Dead Redemption </i>you could probably play is for the rest of next year too.</div>
<p>
<table>
<tr>
<td width="100%"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">1.&nbsp;<i>Mass Effect 2</i></span></td>
</tr>
</table>
<div style="margin: 0px;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TR5DLfJ-rgI/AAAAAAAAA7w/U4N67P6egW0/s1600/MassEffect2_cover.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TR5DLfJ-rgI/AAAAAAAAA7w/U4N67P6egW0/s200/MassEffect2_cover.png" width="131" /></a></div>
<p>The sequel to 2007&#8242;s <i>Mass Effect </i>came out in January and I could still play it right now. That&#8217;s after three substantial DLC releases and multiple attempts at playthroughs. Hell, I&#8217;ve even thought about replaying the first game to set up the ideal <i>Mass Effect 2 </i>run. The new combat system is terrific, making the game a competent third person shooter made exceptional by the biotic and technical powers that you and your squad can use. I love how Bioware streamlined the RPG systems, making character leveling substantially less complex and turning armor into a fun cosmetic experience instead of a constant battle against your inventory. The story is great too, crushing you with the gravity of your suicide mission right through the end. <i>Mass Effect 2 </i>is everything I love about video games and a reminder of why the medium remained my favorite in 2010.&nbsp;Now let&#8217;s get that <i>Mass Effect 3 </i>already.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=817</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Speaka De Kinglish</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=816</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=816#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 21:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The King&#8217;s Speech It could have been easy to write The King&#8217;s Speech off as Oscar bait. A British monarchy movie and a World War II movie? Come on, give someone else a chance. But, whether you want to like it or not, The King&#8217;s Speech is a damn fine film that will warm its [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><i>The King&#8217;s Speech</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TR5F2EbVYHI/AAAAAAAAA74/6QyTj_pmYEE/s1600/Kings_speech_ver3.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="240" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TR5F2EbVYHI/AAAAAAAAA74/6QyTj_pmYEE/s320/Kings_speech_ver3.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<p>It could have been easy to write <i>The King&#8217;s Speech </i>off as Oscar bait. A British monarchy movie <i>and </i>a World War II movie? Come on, give someone else a chance. But, whether you want to like it or not, <i>The King&#8217;s Speech </i>is a damn fine film that will warm its way into your heart until you&#8217;re smiling like the chief idiot at ye olde idiot factory.</p>
<p>King George VI (Colin Firth) has a problem. Well, he&#8217;s not king yet, but we&#8217;ll get there. He&#8217;s a good man, smart and respectful, but he has a terrible stammer. Early on we are shown his attempts to speak to a large audience, and it is brutal. Fortunately for His Highness, he&#8217;s got a loving wife (Helena Bonham Carter) who will do whatever it takes to find her husband some counsel. Eventually she finds Lionel Logue (Geoffrey Rush), an Australian speech therapist who is confident he can cure the King. While his techniques are unorthodox the duo form an unlikely friendship during the years leading up to King George VI receiving the crown and a German tyrant rises to power (Hitler).</p>
<p>I know it doesn&#8217;t sound that inspired and there are a few cliche moments, but <i>The King&#8217;s Speech </i>is propelled by some great performances. Firth&#8217;s stammer is brutal, yet he always carries an air of elegance and respectability. Rush does no such thing, but he&#8217;s a lot of fun and the interaction between the two, which makes up the majority of the film, is a lot of fun to watch. Helena Bonham Carter, who I&#8217;ve become&nbsp;accustomed&nbsp;to playing dark, evil characters, is here full of support and love for her husband. The rest of the supporting cast is top-notch and fully British.</p>
<p><i>The King&#8217;s Speech</i> is probably a little too long, and there are some plot points that aren&#8217;t handled well (The Prime Minister and Parliament are underdeveloped, the subplot about Logue&#8217;s acting career is dropped) but taken as a story of friendship and&nbsp;perseverance&nbsp;it&#8217;s quite good. Now I just wish they wouldn&#8217;t give the R rating for a silly scene of swearing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=816</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marky Mark and the Punchy Bunch</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=815</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=815#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 10:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Fighter Some kinds of stories never die, we may see them over and over again, but that&#8217;s cause we love em. There&#8217;s nothing original about another underdog boxer story, but it can still provide the kinds of highs and lows we never tire of in the movie going experience. What we should feel fortunate [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">The Fighter</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TRsRCJNqlXI/AAAAAAAAB3o/aQEoH-Ua9yk/s1600/The_Fighter_Poster.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 205px; height: 320px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TRsRCJNqlXI/AAAAAAAAB3o/aQEoH-Ua9yk/s320/The_Fighter_Poster.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5556053293822285170" /></a><br />Some kinds of stories never die, we may see them over and over again, but that&#8217;s cause we love em. There&#8217;s nothing original about another underdog boxer story, but it can still provide the kinds of highs and lows we never tire of in the movie going experience. What we should feel fortunate for with a movie like David O. Russell&#8217;s <i>The Fighter</i>, is that it made it it&#8217;s business to be more than another flash in the pan sports movie. It&#8217;s got a good script, good direction, and most importantly, great acting. So when all these little elements are in the right place, you can bet you&#8217;re gonna have a good time at the movies. </p>
<p><i>The Fighter</i>, is the true story of Micky Ward (Mark Wahlberg), a struggling boxer who lives in the shadow of his older half-brother Dicky Eklund (Christian Bale), the &#8220;Pride of Lowell, Massachusetts&#8221; for supposedly once knocking out Sugar Ray Leonard. Though Micky can take a punch like no one&#8217;s&#8217; business, he&#8217;s weighed down by his controlling mother (Melissa Leo) and his now crack addicted brother Dicky. Things get heated as Micky falls for Charlene (Amy Adams) a saucy bartender who tries to convince Micky that his family is holding him back. Yep, it&#8217;s a roller coaster of emotions (and annoying Boston accents), that results in a whirlwind of laughs, tears, and cheers. </p>
<p>&#8220;Acting&#8221; (say it like James Lipton) is really what makes this overly familiar sports movie worth watching. Christian Bale sacrifices his physical appearance once again to play the edgy, drugged out, Dicky and all the award buzz is well deserved. Amy Adams, who&#8217;s always good is another standout, playing against type and Melissa Leo fits perfectly into the role of a pushy, Boston, mother. Mark Wahlberg plays well, Mark Wahlberg, which as far as I&#8217;m concerned is pitch perfect for this kind of movie. You just couldn&#8217;t ask for more in such a solid class, especially in a movie called &#8220;The Fighter.&#8221;</p>
<p>Already swept in awards fare, it&#8217;s hard to say how <i>The Fighter</i> will fare. Christian Bale seems to be the front runner for Best Supporting Actor, but who know&#8217;s if he&#8217;ll get that K.O. come February. All I know is that <i>The Fighter</i> is a rip-roaring good time, must be a helluva time to be from Massachusetts right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=815</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>104</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>C.A.T: Elephant</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=814</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=814#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 00:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=814</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The White Stripes- Elephant (2003) Seems uninspired to do such a popular album, but at the same time it makes me realize something. It&#8217;s only been about seven years and this album is already considered a classic. Time flies I suppose, but I have so many fond memories of this album. I can clearly remember [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">The White Stripes- <i>Elephant (2003)</i></span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TRqABak17rI/AAAAAAAAB3g/L9P_qne5-Kk/s1600/Elephant%252C_The_White_Stripes.png"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 200px; height: 200px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TRqABak17rI/AAAAAAAAB3g/L9P_qne5-Kk/s200/Elephant%252C_The_White_Stripes.png" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5555893852117003954" /></a><br />Seems uninspired to do such a popular album, but at the same time it makes me realize something. It&#8217;s only been about seven years and this album is already considered a classic. Time flies I suppose, but I have so many fond memories of this album. I can clearly remember it&#8217;s popularity and how ti affected the youngins&#8217;. </p>
<p>&#8220;Seven Nation Army&#8221;, more or less the &#8220;Smoke on the Water&#8221; of it&#8217;s time. Almost everyday in my Junior High guitar class someone just had to be playing that hypnotic riff. I was cool, I was more into playing &#8220;The Hardest Button to Button&#8221; with Ryan Moore. Not many albums give me such distinct memories of yesteryear, but this does. It&#8217;s also amazing that it has such staying power, perhaps it&#8217;s just the raw simplicity of this garage rock duo.</p>
<p>Jack White is just so unlike any rocker before or after him. His playing and singing or so distinct and he can really tap into some primal emotions with his songwriting. Leave it to his ability as a songsmith to weave together such an eclectic batch of songs. You got punk, blues, rock, a Burt Bacharach cover and yet I wouldn&#8217;t change a thing. It&#8217;s a real joy re listening to this after so many years, but it&#8217;s just as good, if not better than ever. </p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;Girl You Have No Faith in Medicine&#8221;, &#8220;The Hardest Button to Button&#8221;, &#8220;I Just Don&#8217;t Know What to Do with Myself&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=814</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Season&#8217;s Beatings</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=813</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=813#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Dec 2010 05:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Married Christmas!&#8221; As I once declared in my younger and more vulnerable years. Today of course being that time of year that Jesus rises from the grave to feed upon the flesh of the living. No, I don&#8217;t have anything of particular note to announce, nor do I have a disturbing message of our watchful [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TRcDuU02YiI/AAAAAAAAB3I/zeVK-6Cbb0U/s1600/SantasSlay02.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 211px; height: 320px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TRcDuU02YiI/AAAAAAAAB3I/zeVK-6Cbb0U/s320/SantasSlay02.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5554912759784038946" /></a>&#8220;Married Christmas!&#8221; As I once declared in my younger and more vulnerable years. Today of course being that time of year that Jesus rises from the grave to feed upon the flesh of the living. No, I don&#8217;t have anything of particular note to announce, nor do I have a disturbing message of our watchful omniscience (as Sean posted last year), all I have to proclaim is &#8220;Happy Holidays!&#8221; </p>
<p>P.S. You can expect to see some &#8220;Best of 2010&#8243; lists in the following weeks and all sorts of other absurdities, so keep reading and once again, &#8220;Married Christmas!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=813</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Country For Fat Old Men</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=812</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=812#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 05:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[True Grit As John&#8217;s retrospecticus has pointed out, the Coen brothers have already done novel adaptations as well as remakes. Their latest film, True Grit sees them taking on a project that is both a remake of the 1969 John Wayne film, but also an adaptation of Charles Portis&#8217;s novel. Now you&#8217;d think that a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:x-large;">True Grit </span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 205px; height: 320px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TRLr9WLDYKI/AAAAAAAAA7c/i2s0Nu8sgo0/s320/true_grit_movie_poster_02.jpg" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5553760729657729186" />As John&#8217;s retrospecticus has pointed out, the Coen brothers have already done novel adaptations as well as remakes.  Their latest film, <i>True Grit</i> sees them taking on a project that is both a remake of the 1969 John Wayne film, but also an adaptation of Charles Portis&#8217;s novel.  Now you&#8217;d think that a film with so many ties to earlier material might diminish that signature Coen brothers style.  But make no mistake about it, this film feels like about exactly what a Coen brothers Western should feel like.
<div></div>
<div>The film&#8217;s premise is about as simple as it gets, as it chronicles a young girl&#8217;s search for Tom Chaney (Josh Brolan), the man who killed her father.  In order to track down this killer, she hires U.S. Marshall Rooster Cogburn, a role made famous by the late John Wayne, now played with laconic crustiness by the always reliable Jeff Bridges.  </div>
<div></div>
<div><i>True Grit</i> in many ways does feel like the Coens taking on more commercial material, with it&#8217;s all-star cast and fairly linear story.  And yet you&#8217;ve got all the hallmarks of what makes a Coen brothers film a pleasure to watch.  You&#8217;ve got that great obtuse dialogue, some wonderfully odd supporting characters, and some absolutely breathtaking cinematography from the masterful Roger Deakins.  </div>
<div></div>
<div>I haven&#8217;t seen the original <i>True Grit</i>, so I can&#8217;t really say how Jeff Bridges stacks up against the Oscar-winning performance of The Duke, but I&#8217;d say it ranks among Bridges&#8217; better performances.  However, the biggest stand-out of the film for me is the 14-year-old Hailee Steinfeld, who despite her age manages to carry much of the film.  Matt Damon and Josh Brolan also turn in solid performances, but I&#8217;d say it&#8217;s the dynamic between Steinfeld and Bridges that really drives the film.</div>
<div></div>
<div>So <i>True Grit</i> doesn&#8217;t quite see the Coens reinventing the Western, but merely approaching it in their own unique way.  So now that they&#8217;ve officially crossed off the western on their list of genres, I can only imagine what genre they take on next.  Sci-fi perhaps?</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=812</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Retrospecticus: The Coen Brothers</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=811</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=811#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 08:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Retrospecticus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For over twenty years, Ethan and Joel Coen have defied modern conventions with some of the most unusual, bold, and inventive films around. They&#8217;ve tackled countless genres and reinvented themselves time and time again, making them some of the most innovative filmmakers of their era. In preparation of True Grit i have assembled this list [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For over twenty years, Ethan and Joel Coen have defied modern conventions with some of the most unusual, bold, and inventive films around. They&#8217;ve tackled countless genres and reinvented themselves time and time again, making them some of the most innovative filmmakers of their era. In preparation of <i>True Grit</i> i have assembled this list of the duo&#8217;s complete filmography, which I will discuss in varying lengths. Just remember that these are like, my opinions man, so don&#8217;t take it too seriously.  </p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Blood Simple (1984)</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TRG62RVktSI/AAAAAAAAB1M/mcY0GSuFAt4/s1600/Blood%2BSimple%2Bposter%2B1.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 210px; height: 320px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TRG62RVktSI/AAAAAAAAB1M/mcY0GSuFAt4/s320/Blood%2BSimple%2Bposter%2B1.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5553425257054123298" /></a><br />Where it all started, the eerie, neo noir, thriller, that is <i>Blood Simple</i>. It&#8217;s an impressive first film in many areas. The Cinematography (By future director Barry Sonnenfeld is increasingly ingenious), the score by Carter Burwell is excellent , the cast featuring; Frances McDormand, John Getz, Dan Hedaya and M. Emmet Walsh (easily the best) to name a few are thrilling, and the suspense is never ending. The perfect film to begin a career of  masterful filmmaking.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Raising Arizona (1987)</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TRG7B0a2MJI/AAAAAAAAB1U/WHwE-cY8ZwU/s1600/MPW-39975.jpeg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 206px; height: 320px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TRG7B0a2MJI/AAAAAAAAB1U/WHwE-cY8ZwU/s320/MPW-39975.jpeg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5553425455450042514" /></a><br />After their brooding debut, the Coen&#8217;s took on what would be their first of many genre blurring films, the dark comedy <i>Raising Arizona</i>. In any other hands this film could of been a huge misfire, but instead it went on to be one of the Coen&#8217;s most enduring comedies.</p>
<p> It&#8217;s a great setup when ex-con Hi McDunnough (Nicolas Cage) and ex-cop &#8220;Ed&#8221; (Holly Hunter) decide to kidnap one of the five sons of a wealthy furniture salesman, Nathan Arizona (Trey Wilson). I mean in any other hands this project would sound like an instant failure, but the Coen&#8217;s were ahead of the curb with this one. From the dialogue, to the setting, to the supporting cast of nuts (John Goodman, William Forsythe, Randall Cobb) this film still stands out as a delightfully different comedy. </p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Miller&#8217;s Crossing (1990)</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/2.5.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TRG7jh7qtxI/AAAAAAAAB1c/7KSYHwMY0dI/s1600/70970549.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 214px; height: 320px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TRG7jh7qtxI/AAAAAAAAB1c/7KSYHwMY0dI/s320/70970549.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5553426034602981138" /></a><br />One of my rare departures from the general consensus, I find <i>Miller&#8217;s Crossing</i> to be a challenging film. Inspired by the hard boiled fiction of Dashiell Hammett, <i>Miller&#8217;s Crossing</i> is an intricately woven mystery thriller, but I find the dense plot hard to get into.</p>
<p>Though I&#8217;m definitely in the minority on this one, as the critics really fell for this gangster flick. One thing I think everyone can agree on is the performances. A shining moment for character actors like Gabriel Byrne, Albert Finney, and John Turturro as apposed to casting bigger names. </p>
<p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Barton Fink (1991)</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TRHBAMzBsxI/AAAAAAAAB18/Z9NIiyIj9KE/s1600/barton-fink-poster.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 217px; height: 320px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TRHBAMzBsxI/AAAAAAAAB18/Z9NIiyIj9KE/s320/barton-fink-poster.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5553432024703939346" /></a><br />I don&#8217;t know how the hell you&#8217;d classify this movie, but man what an experience. John Turturro is hilarious as the young and nervous title character, stressing over a script while inhabiting a dreary L.A. hotel that seems to have a life of it&#8217;s own. John Goodman is equally amusing as the mysterious insurance salesman Charlie and what follows is chaos of the best kind. </p>
<p>Masterfully layered, acted, and photographed. The ambiguity of all the visual symbolism leaves you with a lot of questions, but I like that. It gives you the opportunity to personally dissect all the details and make your own connections, very compelling.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">The Hudsucker Proxy (1994)</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TRG9sIo0PwI/AAAAAAAAB1k/nWM3l5YAsds/s1600/hudsucker_proxy.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 222px; height: 320px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TRG9sIo0PwI/AAAAAAAAB1k/nWM3l5YAsds/s320/hudsucker_proxy.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5553428381455105794" /></a><br />I think when people heard the Coen&#8217;s were taking on the absurdities of the business world they were anticipating something a tad, well smarter. Possibly a razor sharp satire or something more insightful, not an over-the-top, screwball comedy that knows no bounds. It&#8217;s penchant for being silly is in my eyes both it&#8217;s gift and curse. Either you&#8217;ll laugh at quirks like Jennifer Jason Leigh&#8217;s fast talking delivery and Tim Robbin&#8217;s air headed demeanor, or you won&#8217;t. </p>
<p>I can see why some dislike it&#8217;s silly nature, as it does tend to hamper the latter half of the film. Though I think it&#8217;s style and humor saves it, how could you not like Tim Robbins as a bumbling mail clerk who becomes the CEO of a big whig company? Anything with Paul Newman can&#8217;t be that half bad either, ooh or Coen Brother&#8217;s pal Bruce Campbell. The Coen&#8217;s probably didn&#8217;t win any new fans with this one, but they definitely  furthered their reputation for being unconventional. </p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Fargo (1996)</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/5.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TRG907PufjI/AAAAAAAAB1s/JcdnfHikoHM/s1600/fargo.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 214px; height: 320px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TRG907PufjI/AAAAAAAAB1s/JcdnfHikoHM/s320/fargo.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5553428532479032882" /></a><br />If you could take one film to sum up the Coen&#8217;s entire career, it would probably be <i>Fargo</i>. For no other Coen film features the duo&#8217;s trademark humor, suspense, and atmosphere as well as this classic dark comedy. Frances McDormand stars in the role of her life as the likable, humble and humorous police chief Marge Gunderson and shines in almost every scene. The supporting cast is equally impressive with the likes of William H. Macy, Steve Buscemi and the very creepy Peter Stormare. </p>
<p>The laughs are big, the thrills are nonstop, the setting is beautiful, and the story is timeless. This film is more or less the definition of dark comedy and never fails at entertaining, while giving you something to think about, oh ya you bet cha. </p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">The Big Lebowski (1998)</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.5.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TRG98N2rh7I/AAAAAAAAB10/3zZwf6kv7gE/s1600/600full-the-big-lebowski-poster.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 217px; height: 320px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TRG98N2rh7I/AAAAAAAAB10/3zZwf6kv7gE/s320/600full-the-big-lebowski-poster.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5553428657733339058" /></a><br />I don&#8217;t think many would argue that this is the Coen&#8217;s most popular film and why not? The characters are refreshingly unique and ridiculous and are constantly put into completely unpredictable situations. It&#8217;s the little details more than anything that fans remember; The Dude&#8217;s interests, Walter&#8217;s stories about faith and war, Donnie&#8217;s incessant questions and all the other quirks. It&#8217;s spawned an entire culture of swanky fandom and burrowed itself deep into pop culture with it&#8217;s quotes and overall style.</p>
<p><i>The Big Lebowski</i> essentially plays out like a stoner mystery movie. It&#8217;s a dysfunctional, rambling, series of events that perfectly suits it&#8217;s dysfunctional characters. You never know what The Dude will encounter next and although that results in a bit of a sloppy storyline, it&#8217;s a whole bag of fun to watch. Jeff Bridges is arguably in the role of his life and yet he&#8217;s still almost upstaged by the immensely talented John Goodman. There&#8217;s so much to talk about with this film that I won&#8217;t even try. Just kickback with a White Russian, blast some Creedence, and then watch <i>The Big Lebowski</i> </p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">O Brother, Where Art Thou? (2000)</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TRHCqUYgBxI/AAAAAAAAB2E/rCy-8gSIf1I/s1600/o_brother_where_art_thou_ver1.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 215px; height: 320px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TRHCqUYgBxI/AAAAAAAAB2E/rCy-8gSIf1I/s320/o_brother_where_art_thou_ver1.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5553433847806297874" /></a><br />Homer&#8217;s Odyssey meets the Great Depression in the deep south? Now that&#8217;s a recipe for a comedy of epic proportions. <i>O Brother Where Art Thou</i> may have been and still may be the most daring Coen production assembled. A period piece set against such a vast setting, would mainstream audiences be ready to see the Coens take on such a big Hollywood project? Thankfully they did and more! George Clooney leads a great cast of misfits, the visuals are jaw dropping, and the story has a timeless feel to it. </p>
<p>This is a film you can enjoy on many different levels. One, you could just enjoy it as a comedy about three bumbling convicts (George Clooney, John Turturro, Tim Blake Nelson) running into a series of misadventures, or two, as something rich with visual metaphors and parallels to classic literature, it&#8217;s surprisingly complex. Can&#8217;t forget that soundtrack arranged by T-Bone Burnett either, classic.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">The Man Who Wasn&#8217;t There (2001)</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TRHC0Nt3F1I/AAAAAAAAB2M/dT1GPZxmBTk/s1600/268952.1020.A.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 217px; height: 320px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TRHC0Nt3F1I/AAAAAAAAB2M/dT1GPZxmBTk/s320/268952.1020.A.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5553434017815533394" /></a><br />The fact this film is constantly overlooked and perhaps the least known Coen film is almost too perfect. It&#8217;s a subtle film and title practically sums up the whole thing. A subdued Billy Bob Thornton plays barber Ed Crane, a simple man who inexplicably becomes involved in both blackmail and murder. Set against the back drop of 1940s Santa Rosa, California and filmed in stunning black and white, <i>The Man Who Wasn&#8217;t There</i> is a chilling tribute to film noir. The mood is quiet  but unnerving and I have to say this may be my favorite Carter Burwell musical score for a Coen Brothers movie.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s pacing is slow and its payoff may not bewhat you&#8217;d expect, but the story is compelling and the acting is pitch perfect. Thornton doesn&#8217;t even have to say anything to bring you into the scene and seasoned pros like Frances McDormand, James Gandolfini, and my favorite Michael Badaluco as Ed&#8217;s overly talkative brother-in-law, keep it very interesting.</p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Intolerable Cruelty (2003)</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TRHC8chbe8I/AAAAAAAAB2U/qmCfL17OcE0/s1600/182089.1020.A.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 217px; height: 320px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TRHC8chbe8I/AAAAAAAAB2U/qmCfL17OcE0/s320/182089.1020.A.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5553434159228877762" /></a><br />Sometimes it seems like the Coens wont rest until they&#8217;ve tackled every genre. <i>Intolerable Cruelty</i> just happens to be the duo&#8217;s stab at the romantic comedy, often considered one of their weaker efforts, it&#8217;s fluff but it&#8217;s fun. George Clooney turns up the Clooney charm as divorce attorney Miles Massey, infamous as the inventor of the &#8220;Massey Prenup&#8221;. Though things get messy when he starts to fall for his clients wife Marilyn Rexroth (Catherine Zeta-Jone), which only further tailspins into deception. </p>
<p>The story that develops here is actually fairly original, for it&#8217;s not so original premise. The twists and turns are well devised and it&#8217;s two beautiful celebrities are entertaining to watch. The supporting cast is  a mixed bag, I mean I love Edward Herrmann as Miles&#8217; client and Geoffrey Rush is fine, though his role feels small, but Cedric the Entertainer wasn&#8217;t doing it for me and Billy Bob Thornton is okay, but his character is a little hard to swallow. <i>Intoelrable Cruelty</i> is easy on the eyes, but no more than a footnote when looking at the rest of the Coen filmography. </p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">The Ladykillers (2004)</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/2.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TRHDEfUm96I/AAAAAAAAB2c/TjWZwaEeSEA/s1600/the-ladykillers-1929-poster-large.jpeg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 216px; height: 320px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TRHDEfUm96I/AAAAAAAAB2c/TjWZwaEeSEA/s320/the-ladykillers-1929-poster-large.jpeg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5553434297419364258" /></a><br />Even when the Coen&#8217;s misfire, they do it with style. <i>The Ladykillers</i> is easily the duo&#8217;s worst film; the characters are broad with one note personalities, the laughs are far too few, and there doesn&#8217;t seem to be much heart to it. Really it was hardly necessary as the original 1955 heist film is considered a classic. That all said this film still has the pleasure of being coated with that Coen shine. Roger Deakins cinematography is top notch, Carter Burwell and T-Bone Burnett&#8217;s score is befitting and it&#8217;s just approached with such a unique manner. Plus it&#8217;s got Tom Hanks, and even Hank&#8217;s in a bad movie is fun to some extent. </p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">No Country For Old Men (2007)</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/5.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TRHEgVFfS9I/AAAAAAAAB2k/2Y5Hqj-o-hY/s1600/no-country-for-old-men-poster.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 217px; height: 320px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TRHEgVFfS9I/AAAAAAAAB2k/2Y5Hqj-o-hY/s320/no-country-for-old-men-poster.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5553435875219557330" /></a><br />Razor sharp thriller, faithful literary adaptation, Oscar winner, what else is there to say about <i>No Country for Old Men</i>? It&#8217;s a modern American classic that goes for the jugular while simultaneously operating on a philosophical level. It&#8217;s talented novelist Cormac McCarthy&#8217;s words brought to life in such a thrilling way, that it actually surpasses his original work. The Blue collared banter between Llewelyn (Josh Brolin) and his wife Carla Jean (Kelly McDonald ) is priceless and Tommy Lee Jones is strong in the role of the old school Sheriff Tom Bell. Although it&#8217;s Javier Bardem who steals the show, in his academy award winning role as villainous hitman Anton Chigurh, gives me the creeps just thinking about it. </p>
<p>This has quickly become the Coen brothers film dearest to my heart. It doesn&#8217;t quite have the humor of past Coen works, but it&#8217;s one of the best thrillers of it&#8217;s era and my favorite film of the 2000s, god I wanna watch it right now! </p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Burn After Reading (2008)</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TRHEnT5gciI/AAAAAAAAB2s/rD1qQwtvU2k/s1600/bar1.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 217px; height: 320px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TRHEnT5gciI/AAAAAAAAB2s/rD1qQwtvU2k/s320/bar1.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5553435995159949858" /></a><br />Following up their big Oscar Win, the Coens returned to form with the typical, quirky, dark comedy that is <i>Burn After Reading</i>. More or less a spoof on the espionage thriller genre, <i>Burn After Reading</i> features all your usual Coen collaborators, playing your typical oddball Coen characters. It&#8217;s hard to pick a favorite when you have so many talented stars acting so silly. You got George Clooney as the sickeningly smug former U.S. Marshall, Frances McDormand and Brad Pitt as a pair of bumbling gym employees, John Malkovich and Tilda Swinton as the icy cold couple, it&#8217;s all the stuff you love to see in a Coen Bros. flick. </p>
<p>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">A Serious Man (2009)</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TRHEwLObLWI/AAAAAAAAB20/dGHLUEA6lLY/s1600/asm_onesheet_final.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 208px; height: 320px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TRHEwLObLWI/AAAAAAAAB20/dGHLUEA6lLY/s320/asm_onesheet_final.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5553436147450588514" /></a><br />Perhaps the most personal work from Ethan and Joel yet, set in their homestate of Minnesota during the 1960s, <i>A Serious Man</i> is an offbeat comedy about life, death, sex, faith and everything else that can go sour when you&#8217;re simply trying to live a just life. </p>
<p>Michael Stuhlbarg gives an unforgettable performance as professor Larry Gopnik, who despite his efforts, always seems to get the short end of the stick. His wife (Sari Lennick) wants a traditional jewish divorce, his reckless brother Arthur (Richard Kind) wont leave the couch, one of his students maybe blackmailing him and Larry can&#8217;t seem to get any answers to his woes on life. </p>
<p>Upon first viewing I was actually disappointed by this film. I loved the humor and style, but the ending seemed so abrupt and dark, but as I&#8217;ve come to understand more of what&#8217;s under the surface, I&#8217;ve really come to love this film. It&#8217;s so unlike any other comedy about dysfunctional families, with it&#8217;s rich metaphors and meanings permeating through the tension of it&#8217;s characters. It just goes to show that even after 20 odd years, the Coen&#8217;s haven&#8217;t skipped a beat. </p>
<p><b>What Lies Ahead?</b><br /><i>True Grit</i> is the latest from the duo and I&#8217;m sure it will be another interesting entry in this diverse filmography. Look for a review from Colin coming soon.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m yet to see the Coen&#8217;s short for the the film <i>Paris, je t&#8217;aime</i>, but not for long,  Otteni out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=811</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>C.A.T: Turn on the Bright Lights</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=810</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=810#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 07:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interpol &#8211; Turn on the Bright Lights (2002) Interpol&#8217;s 2002 debut Turn on the Bright Lights stands out the most to me from all the albums that came out that year. Maybe that&#8217;s because it showed so much potential for a band that could never quite live up to this monolithic release. Maybe it&#8217;s because [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:x-large;">Interpol &#8211; <i>Turn on the Bright Lights </i>(2002)</span>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TRHByNdAvNI/AAAAAAAAA7M/u0m7Z4Pwcm8/s1600/Interpol_-_Turn_On_The_Bright_Lights.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TRHByNdAvNI/AAAAAAAAA7M/u0m7Z4Pwcm8/s200/Interpol_-_Turn_On_The_Bright_Lights.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<p>Interpol&#8217;s 2002 debut <i>Turn on the Bright Lights </i>stands out the most to me from all the albums that came out that year. Maybe that&#8217;s because it showed so much potential for a band that could never quite live up to this monolithic release. Maybe it&#8217;s because I&#8217;ve already written enough on <i>A Rush of Blood to the Head </i>(it&#8217;s good) and <i>Sea Change </i>(it&#8217;s the best). Conversely, maybe it&#8217;s because I don&#8217;t want to write about <i>Yoshimi </i>or <i>Yankee Hotel Foxtrot. </i>Or maybe it&#8217;s because I end up listening to <i>Turn on the Bright Lights </i>all the time. It seems to be installed in my head, like <i>The Manchurian Candidate</i>, I can go off at any moment and find myself compelled to turn on those lights myself.</p>
<p>I find it amusing that a band called Interpol is such a product of one specific place: New York City. These guys know exactly where they are from and it has influenced them in a profound way. <i>Turn on the Bright Lights </i>feels like it&#8217;s dedicated to the streets and buildings that turned them into the people they were then and are now. There is a certain emotionality to the album; despite its cool exterior, their is warmth here.</p>
<p>I guess the Joy Division comparisons are unavoidable if you are familiar if that band, but I&#8217;m not, so let&#8217;s move along. <i>Bright Lights </i>is an album that pulls you in with some pretty amazing songs placed right at the beginning. &#8220;Untitled,&#8221; &#8220;Obstacle 1&#8243; and &#8220;NYC&#8221; all show you exactly what Interpol is about and the best of what they can do. I used to feel like the album got less interesting as it went on, but if you stop and listen to any track on its own, you&#8217;ll find that there&#8217;s something to respect there. There&#8217;s a reason it ended up on so many top ten lists eight years ago.</p>
<p>Anyway, I&#8217;m pretty sure everybody&#8217;s spent some time with this album before. I volunteered to post a CAT today but couldn&#8217;t put in the time to come up with something really creative. And as we careen forward towards the modern day, I know I, just like all of you, will be excited to see where, exactly, these yearly CAT posts stop. Until the next time, remember to be safe with in-ear headphones. Bleeding ears are never cool.</p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks: </b>&#8220;Untitled,&#8221; &#8220;Obstacle 1,&#8221; &#8220;PDA&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=810</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Get Ready for some Heavy Vengeance!&quot;</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=809</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=809#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 07:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For all you Da Morgue fans, I&#8217;m very happy to inform you that our 43 minute comedy film &#8220;Rock McTrigger in Heavy Vengeance&#8221; is now available on Vimeo, free of charge naturally. This completes our &#8220;McTrilogy&#8221; that we started in 2006 and were glad we could go out with a bang, hopefully we can put [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For all you Da Morgue fans, I&#8217;m very happy to inform you that our 43 minute comedy film &#8220;Rock McTrigger in Heavy Vengeance&#8221; is now available on <a href="http://vimeo.com/17945927">Vimeo</a>, free of charge naturally. This completes our &#8220;McTrilogy&#8221; that we started in 2006 and were glad we could go out with a bang, hopefully we can put together a DVD, which would also have to be free (because of copyright issues) but if you read this blog just send us a message. </p>
<p>It was a long road to put this together, but it&#8217;s done and were all very happy with it. Really what I cherish most from teh experience is the little things you learn along the way; technical skills, ways to improve hands on production, problems to look for like weather and lighting, there all just little nuggets of experience (of sorts) that will only aid us in future productions. I hope to start another video project again in June with all the usual suspects, so always be on the look out for something offensive on the horizon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=809</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>King Con</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=808</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=808#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 22:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I Love You Phillip Morris So many movies so little time&#8230; It&#8217;s tough when you&#8217;re trying to see all the year&#8217;s best movies before the new year, especially when they&#8217;re all released in December. So sometimes I have to find my own means to see some of them, if you catch my drift. This one [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">I Love You Phillip Morris</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TQ_ZTfaqdXI/AAAAAAAAB1E/J6Pdc_d6ZlA/s1600/I-Love-You-Phillip-Morris-poster_510.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 216px; height: 320px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TQ_ZTfaqdXI/AAAAAAAAB1E/J6Pdc_d6ZlA/s320/I-Love-You-Phillip-Morris-poster_510.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5552895794445186418" /></a><br />So many movies so little time&#8230; It&#8217;s tough when you&#8217;re trying to see all the year&#8217;s best movies before the new year, especially when they&#8217;re all released in December. So sometimes I have to find my own means to see some of them, if you catch my drift. This one was more that I just wanted to see, it cause I&#8217;d actually heard the true story before, I didn&#8217;t even look at any reviews. Luckily I enjoyed the experience, I didn&#8217;t love it, but I don&#8217;t regret it, </p>
<p>Steven Jay Russel (Jim Carrey) was an infamous con man during the late 80s and early 90s. Posing under a whole multitude of different personas, Russell made millions through insurance fraud. Sort of reminds me of <i>Catch Me if You Can</i>, but this story has one big difference, Steven wasn&#8217;t just caught… He was caught tons of times. He almost became better known as an escape artist than a con man through his ingeniously devised breakouts. Though You couldn&#8217;t really talk about Russell without mention of his better half, his gay lover Phillip Morris (Ewan McGregor). A naive and soft spoken man, the two meet in prison and immediately form a lifelong bond, but can that be upheld with Steven&#8217;s addiction to fraud? </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never really been a big Jim Carrey fan, but I find as he&#8217;s gotten older he&#8217;s mellowed out a little. Sure he&#8217;s still playing a flamboyant, con man, with a southern accent, but usually he keeps it in check, only going over the top every once in awhile. Though Ewan McGregor stands out more firmly in my mind, it&#8217;s good to see him take on a more unusual role.</p>
<p><i>I Love You Phillip Morris</i> isn&#8217;t quite award season caliber, but it&#8217;s still an amusing and fascinating flick, made only more fascinating by the fact that it&#8217;s true. It most likely wont be nominated for anything, although I did love the score by Nick Urata, who along with his band <i>DeVotchKa</i>, also did the score to <i>Little Miss Sunshine</i>. So when it comes down to it, I guess you could just say that &#8220;I Like Philip Morris.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=808</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>C.A.T.: Discovery</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=807</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=807#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 06:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Daft Punk &#8211; Discovery (2001) Now here&#8217;s an album that&#8217;s just one big joyous ball of awesomeness. I am by no means a fan of dance music, but if there&#8217;s any album that stands as the definitive entry in the genre, for me it&#8217;d have to be Daft Punk&#8217;s Discovery. Hey I just realized this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:x-large;">Daft Punk &#8211; <i>Discovery </i>(2001)</span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 200px; height: 198px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TQhi3eWJuMI/AAAAAAAAA7U/ABRLPiCX2sY/s200/daft_punk_disovery.jpg" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5550795245912438978" />Now here&#8217;s an album that&#8217;s just one big joyous ball of awesomeness.  I am by no means a fan of dance music, but if there&#8217;s any album that stands as the definitive entry in the genre, for me it&#8217;d have to be Daft Punk&#8217;s <i>Discovery</i>.  Hey I just realized this ties in with Tron: Legacy being released this week, and it also ties in with last weeks CAT being Phoenix.  Nice.
<div></div>
<div>The robotic duo known as Daft Punk have stated that Discovery was supposed to be a tribute to the music of their childhood, and the playful affect that music seems to have on you when you&#8217;re younger.  This is certainly evident in the way Daft Punk infuses its signature brand of house music with this somewhat cheesy but undeniably catchy brand of bubble gum pop.  I mean just try keeping yourself from getting a big grin on your face when you hear something like &#8220;One More Time&#8221; or &#8220;Digital Love&#8221;.</div>
<div></div>
<div>And it&#8217;s not just the singles that are great, though they&#8217;re certainly the songs that stand out.  But tracks like &#8220;Crescendolls&#8221; and &#8220;Voyager&#8221; see Daft Punk applying a sound that&#8217;s a little bit house, a little bit disco, and just all sorts of fun.  It&#8217;s just one of those rare records that manages to sound like a lot of music from the past, while also sounding like a document of the time in which it was released while also pointing the way to the future.</div>
<div>
<div></div>
<div>As we all know, 2001 wasn&#8217;t exactly the happiest year, so I guess it&#8217;s only fitting that the wide-eyed optimism of <i>Discovery</i> was unleashed on the world just a few months before the &#8217;00s started to go downhill.  It&#8217;s definitely got to be one of the best feel-good records of the decade, if not the best.</div>
<div>
<div><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;One More Time&#8221;, &#8220;Digital Love&#8221;, &#8220;Crescendolls&#8221;</div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=807</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Posthumous Pop</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=806</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=806#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 00:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael Jackson &#8211; Michael I remember getting excited when I first heard &#8220;Breaking News&#8221;, the first track released from this posthumous collection. It wasn&#8217;t great, but it still showed that even in his last years, Jackson still carried more pop prowess in one gloved finger than most of your modern pop hacks. Than I heard [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Michael Jackson &#8211; <i>Michael</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TQgLntRr6mI/AAAAAAAAB08/i9sjLGegs6Y/s1600/MICHAEL-NEW-ALBUM-IN-DECEMBER-2010-michael-jackson-16745977-570-567.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 200px; height: 199px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TQgLntRr6mI/AAAAAAAAB08/i9sjLGegs6Y/s200/MICHAEL-NEW-ALBUM-IN-DECEMBER-2010-michael-jackson-16745977-570-567.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5550699317530716770" /></a>I remember getting excited when I first heard &#8220;Breaking News&#8221;, the first track released from this posthumous collection. It wasn&#8217;t great, but it still showed that even in his last years, Jackson still carried more pop prowess in one gloved finger than most of your modern pop hacks. Than I heard the first &#8220;official&#8221; single and it was absolutely terrible. Just typical, uninspired, shitty pop that you could hear basically anywhere, suppose I should of been warned by that &#8220;Feautring Akon&#8221; credit. After that I was scared, will this album still sound like the original King of Pop? Or it will it sound like some over produced, Timbaland type, pop disaster?  </p>
<p>First off, I&#8217;d be lying if I said listening to this album wasn&#8217;t embarrassing. I mean Michael Jackson&#8217;s a great performer, he&#8217;s done some incredible work, but this is the Michael Jackson of the 2000s and even he couldn&#8217;t avoid being influenced by the dark side of the modern pop scene. Luckily on even the corniest, most uninspired, tracks you can still rely on Jackson&#8217;s presence and singing ability to keep it compelling. His vocal hiccups and &#8220;Woos&#8221; and &#8220;Uhs!&#8221; are as fresh as ever, you just have to trim back some of the fat to appreciate it. </p>
<p>As far as I&#8217;m concerned there are moments on <i>Michael</i> that are just as good or better that the blah Jackson album <i>Invincible</i> (the last album to be released during his lifetime.) I mean there&#8217;s a actually a lot of tracks on this album I like, not love but enjoy.Sure it&#8217;s unorganized, but it&#8217;s because it&#8217;s a posthumous release, which there&#8217;s no denying was gonna come one way or another.</p>
<p>So you can look at this album in two different ways; as the latest official Michael Jackson album, or as a loose compilation of Jackson just doing what he loved. I prefer the latter and it could of been much worse. Sure the ballads are cheesy, some of the arrangements are so-so, but the style and strength of MJ keeps it afloat as a loving piece of pop. </p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;Behind the Mask&#8221;, &#8220;Breaking News&#8221;, &#8220;(I Can&#8217;t Make It) Another Day&#8221; (Featuring Lenny Kravitz) &#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=806</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Black On Both Sides</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=805</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=805#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 01:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=805</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Black Swan It seems we&#8217;re officially in to that Oscar-y part of the year, where the movies showing up in theaters are starting to get more somber and serious as well as higher in quality. Black Swan, the latest from director Darren Aronofsky is one of those films vying for some Oscar attention. Really it&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:x-large;">Black Swan</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 216px; height: 320px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TQV_oP2tOqI/AAAAAAAAA7M/tUFUFuqfofo/s320/Black-Swan-Poster1-550x814.jpg" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5549982445231487650" />It seems we&#8217;re officially in to that Oscar-y part of the year, where the movies showing up in theaters are starting to get more somber and serious as well as higher in quality.  <i>Black Swan</i>, the latest from director Darren Aronofsky is one of those films vying for some Oscar attention.  Really it&#8217;s a little hard for me to imagine something as dark and twisted as <i>Black Swan</i> getting a lot of Oscar love, but then again, who really cares?
<div></div>
<div><i>Black Swan</i> sees Aronofsky taking a somewhat similar approach to his last film <i>The Wrestler</i>, in that he takes a very visceral approach to putting you in the shoes of the film&#8217;s protagonist, and making you really feel what they&#8217;re feeling physically and mentally.  In this case, it&#8217;s ballet dancer Nina Sayers (played by Natalie Portman), who is cast as the leading lady in a production of Tchaikovsky&#8217;s Swan Lake by a nefarious ballet director (played by Vincent Cassel).  Over the course of the production, Nina basically delves deeper and deeper into madness as the role starts to consume her psychologically, all while her paranoia is fueled by her understudy (Mila Kunis) and her overcontrolling mother (Barbara Hershey).</div>
<div></div>
<div>Now to say this film borders on melodrama would be a bit of an understatement, as some of the scenes in the film are almost laughably over-the-top.  But for a film that is continually drawing parallels towards ballet, where all the emotions are amped-up, it kinda works for the most part.  That said, I couldn&#8217;t help but feel like the script was a little thin in terms of the story and secondary characters.  But that almost doesn&#8217;t even matter, since Aronofsky truly excells when it comes to subject matter like this, and his bravura style of film-making is a big part of what makes the film compelling.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Another big part of what makes the film work is the performance by Natalie Portman, who has now got to be one of the frontrunners for the Best Actress Oscar.  I&#8217;ve never been that big of a Portfan, but I really bought her in this role, as she gives a performance that&#8217;s nothing short of fearless.  Hershey and Kunis are fine, and I liked Vincent Cassell, even if he&#8217;s playing a character that&#8217;s only a marginally interesting depiction of a ballet director.  But for the most part, this is the Portman and Aronofsky show, and I&#8217;m sure both of them will at least get some sort of nomination come Oscar time.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=805</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>107</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Requiescat in Pace, Capisci</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=804</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=804#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 01:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Assassin&#8217;s Creed: Brotherhood Before I actually played Assassin&#8217;s Creed: Brotherhood, I had my doubts about it. It has only been a year since the terrific Assassin&#8217;s Creed II, so how could Ubisoft have put together a whole new experience for this franchise that&#8217;s built on intricate plots and historical environments? Plus, all the marketing hinted [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><i>Assassin&#8217;s Creed: Brotherhood</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TQVsC8C07eI/AAAAAAAAA7I/HNxbokFGfKo/s1600/Assassins_Creed_brotherhood_cover.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TQVsC8C07eI/AAAAAAAAA7I/HNxbokFGfKo/s320/Assassins_Creed_brotherhood_cover.jpg" width="241" /></a></div>
<p>Before I actually played <i>Assassin&#8217;s Creed: Brotherhood</i>, I had my doubts about it. It has only been a year since the terrific <i>Assassin&#8217;s Creed II</i>, so how could Ubisoft have put together a whole new experience for this franchise that&#8217;s built on intricate plots and historical environments? Plus, all the marketing hinted that <i>Brotherhood </i>was mainly a multiplayer game with a tacked on story that could have just been DLC for <i>Assassin&#8217;s Creed II</i>. Well, it turns that that while <i>Brotherhood </i>feels more like an expansion pack than <i>Assassin&#8217;s Creed III</i>, it is also a totally worthwhile experience that fans of the franchise should pick up immediately.</p>
<p>The story mode is substantial, picking up Desmond and Ezio&#8217;s stories where they left off. Desmond and the motley crew of assassins set up shop in a familiar Italian environment as they plunge deeper into Desmond&#8217;s mind, looking for the Apple of Eden that Ezio has hidden. So we learn that after the end of <i>Assassin&#8217;s Creed II</i>, Ezio is forced to return to Rome to take down the Borgia family once and for all. All your favorite characters from the previous game return as Ezio builds up a resistance in the hopes of freeing the city.</p>
<p>This leads to my favorite new game mechanic: recruits. Ezio can&#8217;t do it all alone, so this time around you can help rebellious citizens learn the ways of the assassin. After you save an individual you can call upon them to help you in battle or send them off on contracts all over Europe. They gain experience and you can level them up and customize their appearance too. But the best part is when you call them out to assassinate targets. You just lock on to a target and whistle and one of your people will pop out of nowhere and end that dude. It&#8217;s really fun to watch and a great addition.</p>
<p>The town upgrading mechanic has made the transition to Rome, tasking you with reopening shops and restoring landmarks to increase your income. It feels a lot like <i>Fable II</i>, you just run around finding places you can buy and investing in them. There are blacksmiths, art dealers, tailors, banks and even sewer entrances (which serve as fast travel hubs) for you to dump your money into. The shops have quests now too, although they simply ask you to bring them items to unlock new equipment.</p>
<p>Fighting groups of enemies has been improved as well. Ubisoft has given you the ability to combo kills, basically when you counter an enemy you can leap to the next one for an instant kill. This makes Ezio look like a complete badass and addresses the most common complaint in the franchise: lengthy battles. However, the platforming controls still aren&#8217;t perfect and I found myself jumping off target a bit too frequently.</p>
<p>Multiplayer is the biggest new addition, and it&#8217;s pretty cool. Instead of trying to insert the traditional multiplayer modes, Ubisoft made having multiple assassins work. When you spawn, you&#8217;re given a target to assassinate and all you have to do is kill that bitch to increase your score. Of course, you&#8217;re someone else&#8217;s target too, so at any moment someone could pop out of the crowd and put a knife in your belly. It&#8217;s pretty cool and more fun than I would have expected, since I figured multiplayer <i>Assassin&#8217;s Creed </i>straight up wouldn&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>The multiplayer is substantial enough that you could play it for a while. The singleplayer story is compelling on its own, but the sheer number of sidequests crammed into Rome make it amazing. This isn&#8217;t an amazing step forward from <i>Assassin&#8217;s Creed II</i>, but it is a lot of fun. Trust me, take this leap of faith.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=804</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2010 Music Wrap-Up: Lisbon</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=803</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=803#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 22:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Walkmen &#8211; Lisbon Broken Social Scene, LCD Soundsystem, The National, Deerhunter, etc. 2010 has seen me getting into a lot of bands that have been around for a while, but had basically been ignored by me until this year. The Walkmen are another one of those bands, as it seems they&#8217;ve been putting out [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:x-large;">The Walkmen &#8211; <i>Lisbon</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 200px; height: 178px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TQKuSc2nuBI/AAAAAAAAA7E/zAI7tZWbhCo/s200/the-walkmen-lisbon-0.jpg" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5549189322880038930" />Broken Social Scene, LCD Soundsystem, The National, Deerhunter, etc.  2010 has seen me getting into a lot of bands that have been around for a while, but had basically been ignored by me until this year.  The Walkmen are another one of those bands, as it seems they&#8217;ve been putting out consistently good music for a while now, and have put out another impressive album in <i>Lisbon</i>.
<div></div>
<div>I acquired this album back in September when it came out, but it took a while to grow on me, and at this point it just sounds better each time I listen to it.  I&#8217;d probably have to say this is due to the fact that the album&#8217;s production is deceptively simple, as The Walkmen take a very bare-bones approach to the way each instrument presented.  There&#8217;s a very plucky approach to the guitars, while Hamilton Leithauser&#8217;s ever escalating vocals are just as effective as ever.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Probably the The Walkmen&#8217;s closest comparable band that I can think of are fellow New Yorkers The National.  The Walkmen certainly share that dapper, dejected quality that The National pull off so well, but The Walkmen seem to be a bit more rough and visceral.  Case in point would be <i>Lisbon</i>&#8216;s stand-out track &#8220;Angela Surf City&#8221;, a song whose manic fury nearly matches the greatness of The Walkmen&#8217;s 2004 break-out single, &#8220;The Rat&#8221;.  But for the most part, this is an album about space and atmosphere, which makes for a sound that might not seem like much at first, but just might sneak up on you if you&#8217;re not careful.</div>
<div></div>
<div><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;Juveniles&#8221;, &#8220;Angela Surf City&#8221;, &#8220;Victory&#8221;</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=803</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>97</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2010 Music Wrap-Up: Broken Dreams Club</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=802</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=802#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Girls &#8211; Broken Dreams Club I pretty much never check out EPs, even if they&#8217;re from a band I really really like. But when a band releases an album as instantly likeable as Girls&#8217; 2009 debut, it&#8217;s hard not to wonder &#8220;what else do these guys have got to offer?&#8221;. And basically this EP serves [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:x-large;">Girls &#8211; <i>Broken Dreams Club</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 200px; height: 198px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TQKoSTz5-qI/AAAAAAAAA68/o_-VzWMSilE/s200/girls-broken-dreams-club-hi-res-cover-art1-526x522.jpg" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5549182723382966946" />I pretty much never check out EPs, even if they&#8217;re from a band I really really like.  But when a band releases an album as instantly likeable as Girls&#8217; 2009 debut, it&#8217;s hard not to wonder &#8220;what else do these guys have got to offer?&#8221;.  And basically this EP serves as a great companion piece to that aforementioned debut.
<div></div>
<div>Girls&#8217; first album was defined by a breezy California pop sound that was marked by a production style that was at times polished and at other times messy and chaotic.  This time around the songs seem to take on that more polished sound, with the instruments being fairly glossed over while singer Christopher Owens&#8217; melodies seem to take center stage.</div>
<div></div>
<div>For the most part, these songs are basically just as good as anything on Girls&#8217; debut, with the stand-out tracks being the delightfully upbeat &#8220;Heartbreaker&#8221; and the nearly 8-minute &#8220;Carolina&#8221;.  <i>Broken Dreams Club</i> definitely shows this San Francisco band in a transition period, but it also offers plenty of what made their debut so much fun.  So if you enjoyed what Girls have done so far, this is probably worth checking out.  It definitely gives me reason to be on the look out for whatever these guys do next.</div>
<div></div>
<div><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;Heartbreaker&#8221;, &#8220;Carolina&#8221;</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=802</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2010 Music Wrap-Up: Before Today</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=801</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=801#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 21:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ariel Pink&#8217;s Haunted Graffiti &#8211; Before Today We&#8217;re only a few weeks removed from the end of the year, and thus only a few weeks from our top ten of the year lists, or at least our top ten music lists. So I figured I might as well unload some reviews in a shameless attempt [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:x-large;">Ariel Pink&#8217;s Haunted Graffiti &#8211; <i>Before Today</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 200px; height: 200px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TQKiUU1nP-I/AAAAAAAAA60/2LxhgEmSMhM/s200/ariel-pink-before-today-cover-art.jpg" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5549176160948535266" />We&#8217;re only a few weeks removed from the end of the year, and thus only a few weeks from our top ten of the year lists, or at least our top ten music lists.  So I figured I might as well unload some reviews in a shameless attempt to up my post count for the year.  The first album <i>Before Today</i>, is an album I&#8217;ve had for a while but never felt the need to write about despite the fact that it&#8217;s pretty good.
<div></div>
<div>I guess Ariel Pink has been doing stuff for a while now, but this album sees him taking on a more band-oriented approach, which is fairly noticeable, even if you haven&#8217;t heard his earlier stuff.  There&#8217;s plenty of psychedelic noodling and irreverent weirdness throughout the album, but it&#8217;s all confined to these very well-constructed psych-pop songs.  It&#8217;s no wonder Ariel Pink was formerly signed to Animal Collective&#8217;s record label Paw Tracks, as there&#8217;s a lot of that same glossy psychedelia that was found on <i>Merriwether Post Pavillion, </i>but Ariel Pink definitely seems more interested in a classic pop songwriting approach.</div>
<div></div>
<div>The album kinda peters out towards the end, and I&#8217;m not really that crazy about the first song on the album either, but besides that the bulk of the album is filled with some really good, catchy songs.  It&#8217;s not quite earth-shattering stuff, but it&#8217;s still one I&#8217;ll look back on fondly as one of the better albums that got me through the Fall.</div>
<div></div>
<div><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;Bright Lit Blue Skies&#8221;, &#8220;Round And Round&#8221;, &#8220;Little Wig&#8221;</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=801</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Gibson Dilemma</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=800</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=800#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 19:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nearing a one post week, I had to post this and break that up. Originally I thought this post might be too controversial, but ehh whatever, this is all about the issues. The trailer for the long postponed dramedy, The Beaver was released recently and already there&#8217;s been heavy controversy and criticism surrounding it. Telling [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TQJ8lkC1GMI/AAAAAAAAB00/akEnMJ40GFE/s1600/mel_gibson_beaver_dec6.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 235px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TQJ8lkC1GMI/AAAAAAAAB00/akEnMJ40GFE/s320/mel_gibson_beaver_dec6.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5549134675646421186" /></a><br />Nearing a one post week, I had to post this and break that up. Originally I thought this post might be too controversial, but ehh whatever, this is all about the issues.</p>
<p>The trailer for the long postponed dramedy, <i>The Beaver</i> was released recently and already there&#8217;s been heavy controversy and criticism surrounding it. Telling the story of a severely depressed man (Gibson) who starts living his life through a beaver puppet, it&#8217;s been a hard sell with Gibson probably being the most despised man in Hollywood right now. I in no way condone his behavior, or feel the need to defend him, but I feel it&#8217;s really unfair to start criticizing this movie before it&#8217;s even been released.</p>
<p>I like Mel Gibson&#8217;s movies, maybe he&#8217;s a psycho in real life, but on the screen he&#8217;s charismatic and behind the camera he&#8217;s a natural storyteller. So where can we draw the line separating art from life? Should we boycott a film based on the unrelated, personal issues of one of it&#8217;s parts? I find it completely unreasonable to attack this movie now, no matter what the star has done or said in their personal life. Once again I&#8217;m not trying to defend Gibson, I&#8217;m trying to defend the movies. I don&#8217;t go to the movies cause I hear Will Smith is a nice guy, I go because I like to be entertained. </p>
<p>I think a prime example is Phil Spector, currently imprisoned for murder. MURDER! I don&#8217;t think any sane person supports that, but does that mean we should ignore or disregard his entire body of work? Of course not, it wouldn&#8217;t be fair to the music, or any of the other people who helped create it. The fact that he&#8217;s a convicted criminal has nothing to do with the music. The music should stand apart and be judged in it&#8217;s own category. You could almost consider Ty Cobb to be a similar case. It&#8217;s well publicized that he was a racist, jerk, and prone to violence, but that doesn&#8217;t mean he wasn&#8217;t a  great baseball player. It doesn&#8217;t mean we should ignore all his accomplishments and throw out his records or something, the person and the player should be judged separately. </p>
<p>I hate that celebrities personal lives have become so closely linked to the movies. That a breaking story on the Internet Movie Database can be something like &#8220;Tori Spelling has twins.&#8221; That&#8217;s not news and that has nothing to do with movies. It&#8217;s understandable that people want to know what celebrities are like in real life, because it makes them more relatable. Though I think there should be a fine a line and people shouldn&#8217;t let these stories influence what they see in the cinema. </p>
<p><i>The Beaver</i> could be good, it could totally suck, who knows? It&#8217;s just the fact that so many journalists, and columnists, and bloggers, are berating it so unfairly that really steams my vegetables. Is it fair to director/co-star Jodie Foster, or any of the cast and crew? Why don&#8217;t we just see it for ourselves before we pass such harsh judgement. </p>
<p>P.S. Though I don&#8217;t much support the bashers of this film, there&#8217;s an amusing video on Funny-Or-Die where they replace the Beaver&#8217;s dialogue with the Gibson rant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=800</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>C.A.T: United</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=799</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=799#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 01:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Phoenix &#8211; United (2000) I would of done Kid A if it wasn&#8217;t for the fact that a rumored Radiohead album next year could have potential for a future retrospective, so here is a review of a mighty fine &#8216;lil recording. My fondness for Phoenix doesn&#8217;t stem back that far, but in that little time [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Phoenix &#8211; <i>United (2000)</i></span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TP7fu-tNmUI/AAAAAAAAB0s/CLjY06WxMBM/s1600/PhoenixUnitedalbumcover.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 200px; height: 200px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TP7fu-tNmUI/AAAAAAAAB0s/CLjY06WxMBM/s200/PhoenixUnitedalbumcover.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5548117789166639426" /></a>I would of done <i>Kid A</i> if it wasn&#8217;t for the fact that a rumored <i>Radiohead</i> album next year could have potential for a future retrospective, so here is a review of a mighty fine &#8216;lil recording. </p>
<p>My fondness for <i>Phoenix</i> doesn&#8217;t stem back that far, but in that little time it&#8217;s truly blossomed into a great affection. From the moment Sean, Colin and I saw them live, they&#8217;ve quickly become one of my favorite modern acts. Immediately after seeing them I had to divulge deep into their discography and this one was a real pleasure.</p>
<p>I can only assume that many became familiar with this group with the success of their first single &#8220;Too Young.&#8221; I first heard it the cinematic classic <i>Shallow Hal</i> and had it stuck in the back of mind for about seven years until Colin told me what it was. That&#8217;s a long time to have a song stuck in your head, so when I finally became familiar with this French foursome I pondered, &#8220;What could the rest of the album. sound like?</p>
<p><i>Phoenix</i> have always had a sort of romanticism in their approach to pop/rock. Thomas Mars&#8217; airy vocals are definitely a big part of this, but it could also in part to their dancy pop arrangements. It kind of wavers on that line of rock and dance music, but regardless of what you call it, it sounds terrific. Usually it&#8217;s the most rhythmic or should I eve say &#8220;funky&#8221; tracks that are the most appealing. Aside from &#8220;Too Young&#8221; there&#8217;s the infectiously catchy &#8220;If I Ever Feel Better&#8221; and the souther/funk epic &#8220;Funky Squaredance.&#8221;It&#8217;s all very unique in that it can really get you movin&#8217; while simultaneously being easy on the ears.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s probably a little much saying this album is a classic, but right now it&#8217;s probably one of my favorite albums from 2000, so it felt right. Though who&#8217;s to say what albums we&#8217;ll look back at fondly in the years to come?</p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;If I Ever Feel Better&#8221;, &#8220;Party Time&#8221;, &#8220;Too Young&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=799</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>C.A.T.: 69 Love Songs</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=798</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=798#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 23:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Magnetic Fields &#8211; 69 Love Songs (1999) Figured I might as well do this album for a CAT considering it&#8217;s been taking up a big chunk of the music I&#8217;ve been listening to lately. So move over All Things Must Pass, you&#8217;re no longer the lone triple album that&#8217;s been inducted into the hallowed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:x-large;">The Magnetic Fields &#8211; <i>69 Love Songs </i>(1999)</span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 200px; height: 200px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TPWYN2umG7I/AAAAAAAAA6s/WAQj8EkAqBs/s200/69-love-songs-magnetic-fields-2000.jpg" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5545505879973305266" />Figured I might as well do this album for a CAT considering it&#8217;s been taking up a big chunk of the music I&#8217;ve been listening to lately.  So move over <i>All Things Must Pass</i>, you&#8217;re no longer the lone triple album that&#8217;s been inducted into the hallowed halls of CAT
<div></div>
<div>Basically this album is exactly what it proclaims itself to be: 69 love songs spread out over three volumes, clocking in just short of three hours.  Now you&#8217;d think such a long album would be fairly daunting, but the songs on here really aren&#8217;t that hard to get into, and take on a familiar quality after just a few listens.  I&#8217;d have to say this is indebted to The Magnetic Fields&#8217; lead singer/songwriter Stephen Merritt, whose ear for indelible melodies is second to none.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Merritt has said that he conceived <i>69 Love Songs</i> as &#8220;not an album about love, but an album about love songs, which are very far from anything to do with love.&#8221;  And that sums up the nature of the album pretty well, as Merritt explores a whole slew of different genres, while there&#8217;s an overarching interest in the idea of the love song in American culture.  The lyrics often display plenty of irony or surreal humor, sometimes to an overly cheeky extent.  But even considering the playful insincerity apparent throughout the album, it&#8217;s hard to not fall in love with a lot of these songs.</div>
<div></div>
<div>It&#8217;s kind of hard to really pick out any stand-out tracks in the massive sea of music that is <i>69 Love Songs</i>, but I definitely have an affinity for the more bare-bones acoustic numbers like &#8220;Book Of Love&#8221; or &#8220;I Think I Need A New Heart&#8221;.  Really, this is about as solid a mass of music as you could ask for in a triple album, and I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;ll keep listening to <i>69 Love Songs</i> in the weeks to come as I keep discovering all the charming little moments on it.</div>
<div></div>
<div><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;Book Of Love&#8221;, &#8220;I Think I Need A New Heart&#8221;, &#8220;Papa Was A Rodeo&#8221;</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=798</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trapped in the Canyon</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=797</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=797#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[127 Hours .I&#8217;ve said it before and I&#8217;ll say it again, this is the year of the &#8220;claustrophobia film.&#8221; You had the elevator thriller Devil, the indie horror flick set in a coffin Buried, and now the harrowing true story of Aron Ralston (James Franco) and his experience between a rock and a hard place. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">127 Hours</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>.<br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TPRKKLpEZrI/AAAAAAAAB0k/9Q2EAzueJ0A/s1600/127_hours_poster01.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 216px; height: 320px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TPRKKLpEZrI/AAAAAAAAB0k/9Q2EAzueJ0A/s320/127_hours_poster01.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5545138579984115378" /></a><br />I&#8217;ve said it before and I&#8217;ll say it again, this is the year of the &#8220;claustrophobia film.&#8221; You had the elevator thriller <i>Devil</i>, the indie horror flick set in a coffin <i>Buried</i>, and now the harrowing true story of Aron Ralston (James Franco) and his experience between a rock and a hard place. Yes it&#8217;s 127 Hours, (or 95 minutes) of a man who after being trapped by a boulder, had to amputate his own lower right arm. How can you set an entire movie within a cramped, crevice, of a canyon you might ask? Danny Boyle is your answer. </p>
<p>Coming off of the Oscar smash <i>Slumdog Millionaire</i>, Boyle could of literally taken on any project he desired, but he decided to do something smaller&#8230; Smaller in a big way that is. Boyle uses his unique skills as visual storyteller to attack all senses with beautiful images portrayed in increasingly clever ways. No scene is ever approached in a conventional way and Boyle uses all sorts of tricks to keep us on edge. We see Aron&#8217;s vivid memories shown like swirling dreams, POV&#8217;s from the inside of a bag of urine, a human arm and everything in between. It can be frenetic, it can be serene, it can be emotional, this is a film that looks like no another and tells an amazing story.</p>
<p>Though what would the whole experience be if it wasn&#8217;t for it&#8217;s star? The man who were literally going to have to watch for every passing minute of this all out fight for survival, he&#8217;ll have to be good right? Luckily, that man is James Franco who brilliantly captures every aspect of a man in distress. The moments of anguish, delirium, and finally joy, as Aron cuts himself loose in the film&#8217;s gripping finale. </p>
<p>You would think a story like this would be difficult to portray in hour and a half movie, mostly in regards to pacing. Though leave it to a talented director like Danny Boyle, some of his usual collaborators (Like writer Simon Beaufoy) and a talent in James Franco, and you have yourself a completely original and emotional film. Looks to be another Oscar contender for Boyle and company come early next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=797</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>R.I.P. Leslie Nielsen</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=796</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=796#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 04:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Leslie Nielsen1926-2010What a shocker huh? I mean Leslie Nielsen had been working so long and all the way up his passing if I might add. It&#8217;s bizarre in that I was just watching Naked Gun 2 on TV yesterday, what a tragedy to lose &#8220;The Olivier of Spoofs&#8221; as Roger Ebert once called him. It [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TPMxXLLb0XI/AAAAAAAAB0U/0oPlxqMJMt4/s1600/leslie_nielsen.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 230px; height: 320px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TPMxXLLb0XI/AAAAAAAAB0U/0oPlxqMJMt4/s320/leslie_nielsen.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5544829840430715250" /></a><br /><b>Leslie Nielsen<br />1926-2010</b><br />What a shocker huh? I mean Leslie Nielsen had been working so long and all the way up his passing if I might add. It&#8217;s bizarre in that I was just watching <i>Naked Gun 2</i> on TV yesterday, what a tragedy to lose &#8220;The Olivier of Spoofs&#8221; as Roger Ebert once called him.  It didn&#8217;t even matter if he was starring in an awful movie, Leslie always gave 100% and was always a pleasure to watch.</p>
<p>Getting his big break with the sci-fi classic <i>Forbidden Planet (1956)</i>, Leslie started off his career as your typical straightforward leading man. He followed this with a series of roles for MGM studios (<i>Ransom! (1956)</i>, <i>The Opposite Sex (1956)</i> and <i>Hot Summer Night (1957)</i> and various appearances on television. In 1972 he played the captain in the popular disaster movie <i>The Poseidon Adventure</i>, but it was until 1980 that he truly found his calling&#8230; <i>Airplane</i>. One of the greatest comedies of all time with one of the greatest comedy roles of all time. Dr. Rumack arguably has some of the best lines and Leslie plays it masterfully with stone faced demeanor. Thus from there on he would come to be known as not just a good actor, but a great comedic talent.</p>
<p>Leslie would of course go on to do the classic <i>Naked Gun</i> series playing the serious yet always oblivious Lt. Frank Drebin. This would build a lifelong working relationship with the Zucker brothers and only further Leslie&#8217;s status as the go-to actor for spoof/parody films. Though most of these were fairly hit or MISS, Leslie seemed to enjoy his work and that enthusiasm always rubbed off on viewers. </p>
<p>Leslie passed away from pneumonia today at hospital near his Fort Lauderdale, Fla. He was 84 years old and will be greatly missed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=796</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Be Thankful for Free Music</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=795</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=795#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2010 03:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Girl Talk &#8211; All Day I can&#8217;t say I knew who Girl Talk was before last week, but when I heard this new All Day album was being given away for free on the Internet, well, let&#8217;s just say you&#8217;d have to be a real asshole to turn that down. So I checked it out, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Girl Talk &#8211; <i>All Day</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TOsHZCcUzZI/AAAAAAAAA7E/iUiVfQDiXcE/s1600/Girl_Talk_All_Day.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TOsHZCcUzZI/AAAAAAAAA7E/iUiVfQDiXcE/s200/Girl_Talk_All_Day.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<p>I can&#8217;t say I knew who Girl Talk was before last week, but when I heard this new <i>All Day </i>album was being given away for free on the Internet, well, let&#8217;s just say you&#8217;d have to be a real asshole to turn that down. So I checked it out, and you know what? It&#8217;s pretty good.</p>
<p>The premise here is that Girl Talk takes a bunch of music (mostly new-ish, some classics) and mixes it together into one glorious 71-minute song (or 12 lesser song segments, if you prefer, which I do, in theory). It&#8217;s clearly meant to be listened to in one go, since if I wasn&#8217;t looking I never would have known where one track ended and the next began.</p>
<p>None of the music here, is original, except for all of it. What I mean is that every song is comprised of nothing but samples from popular music, but the results are more powerful than the original musicians could have ever possibly imagined. <i>All Day </i>is joyous and fun, and it is frequently a delight when you hear a familiar loop used in a dynamic new way. It&#8217;s cool beans.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s all a kind of nonsensical fun. If you like, you know, music, might as well give <i>All Day </i>a shot. After all, <a href="http://www.illegal-art.net/allday/">it&#8217;s free</a>.</p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;All Day&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=795</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>C.A.T: You&#8217;ve Come a Long Way, Baby</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=794</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=794#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 23:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fatboy Slim &#8211; You&#8217;ve Come a Long Way, Baby (1998) It seems there&#8217;s been a trend &#8220;Classic Album Tuesday&#8221; posts lately, with the focus on more &#8220;indie&#8221; driven albums, ya know &#8220;less mainstream.&#8221; I couldn&#8217;t think of anything quite in that vein so I opted for the better known, but no less innovative sophomore release [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:x-large;">Fatboy Slim &#8211; <i>You&#8217;ve Come a Long Way, Baby</i> (1998)</span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TOyoI3cmaAI/AAAAAAAAB0E/tFaUjgrk2x4/s1600/YouveComeALongWayBaby2.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 200px; height: 200px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TOyoI3cmaAI/AAAAAAAAB0E/tFaUjgrk2x4/s200/YouveComeALongWayBaby2.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5542990111662565378" /></a>It seems there&#8217;s been a trend &#8220;Classic Album Tuesday&#8221; posts lately, with the focus on more &#8220;indie&#8221; driven albums, ya know &#8220;less mainstream.&#8221; I couldn&#8217;t think of anything quite in that vein so I opted for the better known, but no less innovative sophomore release from Norman Cook aka &#8220;Fatboy Slim.&#8221;</p>
<p>Some albums feel so &#8220;of an era&#8221; for me, even if they are made up of snippets of other songs. Somehow these big beat mashups send me right back to a late 90s sock hop. I mean F.B.&#8217;s beats and catchy hooks are as the young people say &#8220;Off the mo&#8217;fucking chain.&#8221; The results are that of an energetic and exciting chain of toe tapping experiments, featuring some of his most infectious hits. &#8220;Right Here Right Now&#8221; still gets me pumped, even when played before a Mike Sweeney pop up. Hearing &#8220;The Rockafeller Skank&#8221; makes me want to play a snowboarding video game and &#8220;Praise You&#8221; what a joyous number that is.</p>
<p>The bulk of the album is mostly defined as &#8220;Big Beat&#8221; which I guess is basically what it sounds like. Big beats, some synths, and loops coming out the wahzoo are what make up this unpredictable sub genre. That&#8217;s what I love about <i>Fatboy Slim</i> what the hell is he up to? What will this next song be like? You can never tell, it&#8217;s suspsenful. Though I think he&#8217;s best when he finds that one &#8220;hook&#8221; to drive a song. Whether it&#8217;s that guy in &#8220;Rockafeller Skank&#8221; going &#8220;Right about now, the funk soul brother.&#8221; or the masterful use of the string sample from the <i>James Gang&#8217;s</i> &#8220;Ashes, the Rain and I&#8221;, those are his best moments.</p>
<p>I like that F.B. has never been shy about borrowing and sampling other artists work. Rather he celebrates it and always credits other artists for whatever he used. This is more or less his most popular and successful work and definitely my favorite F.B. work. Makes me appreciate the finer things in life, like playing <i>Coolboarders</i> and eating 3D Doritos. </p>
<p>P.S. Oh yeah all his videos, those are pretty great too.</p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;Praise You&#8221;, &#8220;Right Here Right Now&#8221;, &#8220;The Rockafeller Skank&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=794</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>173</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>COD BLOPS</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=793</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=793#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 00:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Call of Duty: Black Ops It&#8217;s been a rough year for the Call of Duty franchise. Certainly not financially, as last year&#8217;s Modern Warfare 2 made a ridiculous amount of money and Blops here seems to be on its way to surpass it. No, Call of Duty had a hard time because series developer Infinity [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><i>Call of Duty: Black Ops</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TOsBZj89Z0I/AAAAAAAAA7A/r0O2Q1j17V8/s1600/CoD_Black_Ops_cover.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TOsBZj89Z0I/AAAAAAAAA7A/r0O2Q1j17V8/s200/CoD_Black_Ops_cover.png" width="161" /></a></div>
<p>It&#8217;s been a rough year for the <i>Call of Duty </i>franchise. Certainly not financially, as last year&#8217;s <i>Modern Warfare 2 </i>made a ridiculous amount of money and Blops here seems to be on its way to surpass it. No, <i>Call of Duty </i>had a hard time because series developer Infinity Ward basically imploded after some nasty firings. Treyarch, the guys responsible for &#8220;off year&#8221; <i>Call of Duty </i>games, is now stuck being the series&#8217; veteran developer, with what remains of Infinity Ward being left an odd mystery. Is Blops a step in the right direction, or does it just continue the fall from grace?</p>
<p>Set during the Cold War, you mainly play as Alex Mason, an Australian-American soldier who played a crucial role in some of the most important conflicts of that era. How crucial? The first mission of the game has you (seemingly) succeed in killing Fidel Castro. Mason has been captured and is interrogated in a dark TV-filled room by an ominous <i>Saw</i> voice about these mysterious numbers. Mason reflects on the last few years of his life, taking us back to Russia, Vietnam and some other places that I probably shouldn&#8217;t mention here.</p>
<p>The story allows for some fun set pieces, although the writing is pretty macho and predictable; certainly the biggest twists in the plot are fun to play out, but you will see them coming. Some moments are accented by chunky guitars and there&#8217;s even some rap in this business. The Vietnam stuff actually tries to seriously use &#8220;Fortunate Son,&#8221; which is pretty played out if you ask me. It&#8217;s that kind of game.&nbsp;Mason is played by Sam Worthington and is not actually supposed to sound Australian, Worthington just can&#8217;t help it. Poor fella, being all rich and famous. Ed Harris plays a CIA bad ass, frequently called the &#8220;ice cube,&#8221; despite the fact that another character is actually played by Ice Cube. Gary Oldman returns as Reznov, a character from the last Treyarch game, <i>Call of Duty: World at War</i>, I guess he&#8217;s their Captain Price.</p>
<p>Gone is Spec Ops, the amazing co-op mode that was easily the best part of <i>Modern Warfare 2</i>. Instead, Treyarch went back to zombies, putting out a survival mode that is just a pain in the ass. Sure, there&#8217;s some campy fun in the concept, especially the second map you unlock when you beat the campaign that features JFK, Castro, Nixon and Secretary McNamara defending the White House from Nazi zombies. But the mode did not do it for me, especially after multiple playthroughs.</p>
<p>The classic <i>Call of Duty </i>multiplayer sweet is present, of course. Treyarch changed leveling, now you earn CoD points which you can spend to upgrade what you want, really streamlining the experience so you can play how you want relatively quickly. You can also gamble those points in wager matches, where if you don&#8217;t place in the top three you&#8217;ll lose whatever you wagered. It&#8217;s all perfectly fine, if this is your thing, then by all means, enjoy.</p>
<p><i>Black Ops </i>is a good game with an enjoyable single player and the same multiplayer that made <i>Call of Duty 4 </i>a hit. That&#8217;s fine, for now. But if the <i>Call of Duty </i>series doesn&#8217;t do something new and exciting next year, Infinity Ward&#8217;s year, then the franchise is in trouble. It&#8217;s already getting kind of stale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=793</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Beginning of the End of the End of the Beginning: Part 1</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=792</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=792#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2010 05:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1 .It&#8217;s been an interesting trip rediscovering the Harry Potter franchise lately. Initially I only followed the first few books and movies, but now I can say I&#8217;ve at least seen all the movies, don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ll ever make the time to read another 800 page book about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1</span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>.<br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TOdtUqa7jWI/AAAAAAAABz8/TXpDlrvGi58/s1600/HP7part1poster.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 216px; height: 320px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TOdtUqa7jWI/AAAAAAAABz8/TXpDlrvGi58/s320/HP7part1poster.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5541518068254739810" /></a><br />It&#8217;s been an interesting trip rediscovering the <i>Harry Potter</i> franchise lately.  Initially I only followed the first few books and movies, but now I can say I&#8217;ve at least seen all the movies, don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ll ever make the time to read another 800 page book about magic though. In my reassessment of the film series, I&#8217;ve come to find that although there really isn&#8217;t anything that separates <i>Harry Potter</i> from any other fantasy series, the film&#8217;s are still marvelously crafted. The sets and visual effects are always eye popping, the cast and performances are usually solid and it&#8217;s all soaking in that unique magical charm. It&#8217;s obsessive popularity and fantasy subject matter are what probably drove me away initially, but I&#8217;ve given it a second chance and put aside my stubbornness to find that all in all, it&#8217;s an entertaining franchise and the latest installment continues that trend. </p>
<p>Filling in the plot details here would be pointless, as that would be far too much ground to cover. Something about destroying horcruxes and how the villainous Lord Voldermort still wants to kill Harry. Don&#8217;t tell me that you could fully understand every little detail without reading the books because that&#8217;s bullshit. Luckily, this installment was fairly easy to follow as it relies more on action and suspense to propel the story. This is easily the darkest entry in the series, I mean it&#8217;s got &#8220;death&#8221; in the title and this film works it&#8217;s PG-13 rating like yo mamma, with all sorts of fights, scary moments, and even a &#8216;lil blood. This is the <i>Harry Potter</i> where shit gets real and it&#8217;s a compelling departure that definitely keeps you on edge. </p>
<p>With Hogwarts as a thing of the past <i>Deathly Hallows</i> also saw our beloved trio traversing across all sorts of new dark and deadly terrain. Like for every string of dialogue they had some new exotic location, stunning eye candy I must say. I can only imagine how much this monster of a movie must of cost, but this is a blockbuster that really gives you the all the bang for your buck. The effects and CGI seem to be improving with every sequel as well. Re-watching the first one I couldn&#8217;t believe how dated some of the CGI is, now it&#8217;s practically seamless in creating the colorful creatures of this world. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m still no big fan of the franchise, but I think I&#8217;ve at least risen to the rank of &#8220;casual fan&#8221;. Meaning I enjoy the action and effects, but don&#8217;t care to look any deeper into the story or extreme details. If there&#8217;s something I don&#8217;t fully understand, I work my way around it, as long as I get the gist of it. So all in all I had a good time and look forward to the conclusion. Therefore it&#8217;s only a matter of a time before one of the most beloved fantasy franchises, will finally come to an end. I&#8217;m glad I could reconnect with and keep with what&#8217;s relevant in the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=792</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>C.A.T: Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Floating in Space</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=791</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=791#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spiritualized &#8211; Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Floating in Space (1997) 1997 saw great new albums from Pavement, Radiohead, The Verve, Oasis and Foo Fighters, some of which we have already paid tribute to in this very feature. But Spiritualized is a group that as far as I can recall has only shown up as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Spiritualized &#8211; <i>Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Floating in Space</i> (1997)</span>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TNp7v0tXdQI/AAAAAAAAA64/X3GgToyJAiI/s1600/Ladies_And_Gentlemen_We_Are_Floating_In_Space-cd.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TNp7v0tXdQI/AAAAAAAAA64/X3GgToyJAiI/s200/Ladies_And_Gentlemen_We_Are_Floating_In_Space-cd.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<p>1997 saw great new albums from Pavement, Radiohead, The Verve, Oasis and Foo Fighters, some of which we have already paid tribute to in this very feature. But Spiritualized is a group that as far as I can recall has only shown up as honorable mentions on lists I&#8217;ve done. Let&#8217;s change that right now by taking a look at certainly their best album, <i>Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Floating in Space</i>.</p>
<p>This album is a great one to listen to as you wander the streets, ride a bus or look out an airplane window. It&#8217;s slow and hypnotic, spending plenty of time working on repetitive riffs that somehow become catchy and memorable. There&#8217;s an element of sadness to the album, but it comes more from a disappointment in the state of the world and human nature than usual musical tropes.</p>
<p><i>Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Floating in Space </i>is also one of those albums that works best taken in its entirety. The songs are arranged in such away that one track leads into the next, it&#8217;s hard to describe, but each song seems better when taken in context. When I play the LP I always start on the first track, it just feels wrong to begin anywhere else, and I often find myself sticking with it for much of the way through. I don&#8217;t really think of it as individual songs, but one cohesive whole. By the way, <i>Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Floating in Space</i> is 70 minutes long (it even says so on the album cover), including an amazing 17-minute final track.</p>
<p>I got hooked by hearing the opening track, &#8220;Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Floating in Space.&#8221; The simplicity of the song and the astounding repetition of the lyric &#8220;all I want in life&#8217;s a little bit of love to take the pain away&#8221; really got to me. This is another side of Brit Pop, one I definitely believe deserved more attention and acclaim.</p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks: </b>&#8220;Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Floating in Space,&#8221; &#8220;Come Together,&#8221; &#8220;I Think I&#8217;m in Love&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=791</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Off the Rails</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=790</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=790#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2010 05:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unstoppable &#8220;We&#8217;ve had airplane, bus, truck, even boat disaster movies, but have you ever seen a train as the centerpiece of the action before?&#8221; Tony Scott asked. &#8220;Yes, we have,&#8221; the studio executive replied, &#8220;in fact, your last movie was set on a train.&#8221; Scott paused for a moment, &#8220;Yeah, but, this time I&#8217;ve got [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><i>Unstoppable</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TN9nrAmqaDI/AAAAAAAAA68/_CwG0flpVYc/s1600/Unstoppable_Poster.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TN9nrAmqaDI/AAAAAAAAA68/_CwG0flpVYc/s200/Unstoppable_Poster.jpg" width="135" /></a></div>
<p>&#8220;We&#8217;ve had airplane, bus, truck, even boat disaster movies, but have you ever seen a train as the centerpiece of the action before?&#8221; Tony Scott asked. &#8220;Yes, we have,&#8221; the studio executive replied, &#8220;in fact, your last movie was set on a train.&#8221; Scott paused for a moment, &#8220;Yeah, but, this time I&#8217;ve got Denzel Washington.&#8221; &#8220;You always get Denzel.&#8221; &#8220;What if instead of John Travolta I put Captain Star Trek in it?&#8221; &#8220;OK, we&#8217;re in.&#8221; And so <i>Unstoppable </i>was born.</p>
<p>Based on a real-life, less exciting tale of an out-of-control train, <i>Unstoppable</i> forces an old pro (Washington) and a rookie (Pine) to try to stop an unmanned freight train that&#8217;s loaded with gas and toxic chemicals and headed for civilization way too fast. Who&#8217;s fault is this? Ethan Suplee, who foolishly tried to jump out of the train and outrun it to the track switch. Who&#8217;s sticking up for our heroes? Rosario Dawson, as a dispatcher who tries to help the guys and talk some sense into the corporate fat cats who think they know best. Will they be able to stop the train in time? See the movie.</p>
<p>What works is Washington and Pine&#8217;s chemistry, with Denzel&#8217;s calm knowledge balancing out Pine&#8217;s hotheadedness. It&#8217;s pretty neat that Denzel seems so cool here, since almost the entire movie he is sitting down. When they dive into each other&#8217;s backstories they get a little less fun, but I guess they had no choice. The issues with Pine&#8217;s relationship with his wife aren&#8217;t handled all that well and probably didn&#8217;t need to be in the movie at all. But whatever. They be bros and we root for &#8216;em.</p>
<p>The train itself is presented beautifully. It always seems big, menacing, dangerous. I swear it even roars when they show it speeding by the Pennsylvania countryside. Tony Scott does a great job of emphasizing just how dangerous this train is, and as we watch multiple attempts to stop it fail it doesn&#8217;t seem as ridiculous as the trailers made me think it would be. The whole movie is very kinetic, always rushing forward towards its conclusion.</p>
<p>So if you&#8217;d like to see another disaster movie, by all means check out <i>Unstoppable</i>. It&#8217;s fun to watch. Just don&#8217;t expect groundbreaking, genre-changing paradigm shifts or generation-defining performances. This is just dudes on a train.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=790</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>C.A.T.: Endtroducing&#8230;..</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=789</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=789#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 00:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DJ Shadow &#8211; Endtroducing&#8230;.. (1996) So it&#8217;s around 1 or 2 AM, and I&#8217;m not really feeling like going to bed quite yet, so what music do I decide should ease me into these wee hours of the morning? Well lately it&#8217;s been the etherial hip-hop odyssey that is DJ Shadow&#8217;s debut Endtroducing&#8230;. I&#8217;m not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:x-large;">DJ Shadow &#8211; <i>Endtroducing&#8230;.. </i>(1996)</span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 200px; height: 200px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TNn4Jb_Kh7I/AAAAAAAAA6k/AjI3TePeupk/s200/endtroducing.jpg" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5537730057843935154" />So it&#8217;s around 1 or 2 AM, and I&#8217;m not really feeling like going to bed quite yet, so what music do I decide should ease me into these wee hours of the morning?  Well lately it&#8217;s been the etherial hip-hop odyssey that is DJ Shadow&#8217;s debut <i>Endtroducing&#8230;.  </i>I&#8217;m not saying it&#8217;ll put you to sleep, but for some reason it just seems like a good fit for those restless nights, I don&#8217;t know why.
<div></div>
<div>This album would eventually make it into the Guinness book of world records for being the first album made completely of samples.  All DJ Shadow used to make the album was a 12-bit sampling drum machine, a set of turntables, and an early version of Pro Tools.  Now I&#8217;m sure just on that basis, if you&#8217;d never heard this album you probably say, &#8220;why would I want to listening to music that is made completely from non-original material?&#8221;  And my answer would be that there really is an artistry to the way Shadow employs his encyclopedic knowledge of obscure music to create something that is quite the opposite of derivative.  In fact there aren&#8217;t many albums that sound quite like it, not that I&#8217;d really know.</div>
<div></div>
<div><i>Endtroducing&#8230;.</i> is generally classified as hip-hop, but really hip-hop is just one piece of the puzzle that is this album.  The genre combines with jazz, funk, classical, and all sorts of different sounds to make an album that has a surprisingly somber tone, while still giving you plenty of funky moments as well.  &#8220;Midnight In A Perfect World&#8221; probably best defines the heavy piano and funky drum sound that exemplifies the album, but if I had to pick a favorite track, it&#8217;d have to be the relentlessly bad-ass &#8220;The Number Song&#8221;.   </div>
<div></div>
<div>So if you&#8217;re looking for something different, check it out.  I mean how many people can say they have more than one instrumental hip-hop album in their collection?  As far as I&#8217;m concerned, this might be the only one I&#8217;ll ever need.</div>
<div></div>
<div><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;The Number Song&#8221;, &#8220;Stem/Long Stem *Transmission 2&#8243;, &#8220;Midnight In A Perfect World&#8221;</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=789</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>95</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jacko is Backo</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=788</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=788#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 05:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I never know what people have or haven&#8217;t heard, but I was unaware until just recently that a posthumous Michael Jackson album is coming out this year. It&#8217;s not surprising considering that Michael Jackson is currently the hottest selling dead celebrity, but I think there&#8217;s a lot of potential for this project. I remember hearing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TNjfNOkCGQI/AAAAAAAABz0/asTlP7CKbDI/s1600/mj-breaking-news.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 203px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TNjfNOkCGQI/AAAAAAAABz0/asTlP7CKbDI/s320/mj-breaking-news.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5537421160192547074" /></a><br />I never know what people have or haven&#8217;t heard, but I was unaware until just recently that a posthumous Michael Jackson album is coming out this year. It&#8217;s not surprising considering that Michael Jackson is currently the hottest selling dead celebrity, but I think there&#8217;s a lot of potential for this project. I remember hearing all the time in 2007 that Michael Jackson was doing a lot of recording.  So there&#8217;s good chance there could be some good stuff here, not like they&#8217;re  just scraping the bottom of the barrel.</p>
<p>The album entitled &#8220;Michael&#8221; is due out  December 10th and new song <a href="http://breakingnews.michaeljackson.com/">&#8220;Breaking News&#8221;</a> is now streaming on M.J.&#8217;s site. Sony records says it&#8217;s not the first commercial single so I guess it&#8217;s just another track on the album, but I like it. It doesn&#8217;t have a really catchy hook, but it&#8217;s arrangement and rhythm are great and it&#8217;s been growing on me. So I&#8217;m excited for this release, I hope there will be a big, catchy, breakout single but even if it&#8217;s just stuff like &#8220;Breaking News&#8221; I&#8217;ll be content, long live the king.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=788</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oh Deer</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=787</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=787#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 03:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Deerhunter &#8211; Halcyon Digest It&#8217;s seems that every fall I must find an amazing alternative album by a band that I&#8217;ve never heard of but it turns out they&#8217;ve been around for a while. It looks like this year that band will be Deerhunter and that album will be Halcyon Digest. It&#8217;s been a little [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Deerhunter &#8211; <i>Halcyon Digest</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.5.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TNHJDo9LO9I/AAAAAAAAA6w/mD7b7marbPI/s1600/Halcyondigest.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="191" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TNHJDo9LO9I/AAAAAAAAA6w/mD7b7marbPI/s200/Halcyondigest.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<p>It&#8217;s seems that every fall I must find an amazing alternative album by a band that I&#8217;ve never heard of but it turns out they&#8217;ve been around for a while. It looks like this year that band will be Deerhunter and that album will be <i>Halcyon Digest</i>.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s been a little while since I listened to an album this icy hot; at times it reminds me the terrific <i>Teen Dream </i>by Beach House and the legendary <i>Merriweather Post Pavilion </i>by Animal Collective. That is not to say <i>Halcyon Digest </i>is derivative, just that it is able to tap into that airy, beautiful world that exists just outside of pop.</p>
<p>Like most things in life, <i>Halcyon Digest </i>starts slow, with the chunky sounds of &#8220;Earthquake&#8221; that evolves into a crushing cacophony that sweeps you away into the land of Deerhunter for the next 10 tracks. I think the standout track for me is &#8220;Helicopter,&#8221; a dreamy, sad song that always grabs me when it comes on.</p>
<p>What really makes <i>Halcyon Digest </i>stand out is that it all seems so laid back. I haven&#8217;t seen Deerhunter play, but this album feels effortless, like these sounds just flew out of them. Or perhaps they flew out of us.</p>
<p>Seriously though, this shit is hotter than the <i>Donkey Kong Country </i>soundtrack.</p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks: </b>&#8220;Memory Boy,&#8221; &#8220;Desire Lines,&#8221; &#8220;Helicopter&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=787</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fail the King</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=786</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=786#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 03:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fable III When Fable III came out a couple of weeks ago, it didn&#8217;t seem real to me.&#160; I hadn&#8217;t really seen much of the game and the first two in the series seemed like they were in development for years. Yet here it was, only a couple years after Fable II, the next entry [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><i>Fable III</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TNdiEyINCSI/AAAAAAAAA60/xsvcmAyVLqQ/s1600/Fableiii.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TNdiEyINCSI/AAAAAAAAA60/xsvcmAyVLqQ/s200/Fableiii.jpg" width="161" /></a></div>
<p>When <i>Fable III </i>came out a couple of weeks ago, it didn&#8217;t seem real to me.&nbsp; I hadn&#8217;t really seen much of the game and the first two in the series seemed like they were in development for years. Yet here it was, only a couple years after <i>Fable II</i>, the next entry in Microsoft&#8217;s answer to <i>Zelda. </i>Unfortunately, <i>Fable III </i>feels like it could have benefited from some more time in development.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s 50 years since <i>Fable II </i>and you play as the younger son or daughter of your hero from the first game. Your older brother, Logan, rules Albion as a tyrant, quickly forcing you to run away with your mentor, loyal butler, and not-as-important-as-<i>Fable-II&#8217;s </i>dog. Despite being a prince or princess you have no money and no one trusts you, so you must go around Albion inspiring the people to bring about a revolution.</p>
<p>Normally, a game would stop when you win the crown. But <i>Fable III </i>tacks on another plot and a few hours of gameplay with you acting as the monarch, forced to choose between honoring the promises you made to those who helped you dethrone your brother. This part of the game is all about money; you&#8217;re forced to choose between popularity and security, which the game equates to being good or evil. Which is messed up. Sometimes a leader has to make unpopular choices for the greater good, but <i>Fable III </i>does not offer that depth. You simply have to be a saint or a dick. Giving rewards based on morality and making choices black and white really hurts what could have been a compelling aspect of the game.</p>
<p>The core of the game is not much changed from <i>Fable II</i>. One button combat returns, and it is as easy as ever to defeat every enemy. Magic has been changed, now you equip two spell gauntlets, allowing you to &#8220;weave&#8221; two spells together, instead of power up through tiers of spells like in the last game. This is less interesting and strategic, although it does look pretty cool. Also, you can now spam the spell attack button, basically allowing you to shield yourself in magic and make every fight stupid easy. Oh, and the dog helps out in fights and finds loot and dig spots for you too. He has no story importance, however.</p>
<p>The story is quite good, although the characters are less memorable than the motley crew from <i>Fable II</i>. There are plenty of funny moments and the cast is one of the best I&#8217;ve heard in a video game. Stephen Fry is back as Reaver, Bernard Hill (the king of Rohan guy) is your mentor Walter, John Cleese is your butler Jasper, Michael Fassbender is your brother Logan, and your companions include Sir Ben Kingsley, Simon Pegg and Naomi Harris. It&#8217;s just a shame that the monarch stuff at the end feels rushed.</p>
<p>What feels the most rushed is the interface, which is a real problem. In <i>Fable II</i>, the biggest complaint people had was the menu system. It was slow and took too long to browse through. So instead of just making a better menu, <i>Fable III </i>introduces the Sanctuary. Now when you press start you&#8217;re teleported to this place where you can choose to go to a rooms to level up, change weapons, change clothes, and look at your fortune. It&#8217;s really a neat system for looking at your wealth (it&#8217;s a Scrooge McDuck style pile) and gear, but it gets really frustrating in practice.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s say you&#8217;re leveling up a weapon (they have achievement style goals now, i.e. &#8220;kill 300 mercs&#8221;). You have to press start, run into the weapon room, find your weapon on the rack and select it. Even if you just want to check your quest log, you have to return to the sanctuary and run to the world map and then open in. They really should have had an in game map and quest log, especially since the game suffers from a number of fast travel and questing bugs.</p>
<p>The game has a lot of janky qualities. The breadcrumb trail breaks some times. Selecting fast travel from the quest list sometimes teleports you farther away than if you had just fast traveled to the town. One story quest straight up bugged out for me. I had to seduce a lady but could not interact with her. This was about halfway through the game, and remains broken even now, after I&#8217;ve beaten it and Lionhead has even released a patch. When I got married, I paid for the fancy royal wedding, only for my and my wife&#8217;s models not to appear in the cinematic. I could not interact with the wife after the ceremony, and when I rebooted the game she ceased to exist.</p>
<p><i>Fable III </i>is a good game in spite of itself. The adventuring during most of the game is a lot of fun, helped further by its excellent cast. There are plenty of things to do and collectibles to obtain. The multiplayer is fully functional, everything we wanted from <i>Fable II</i>. However, some of the game is straight up broken and a lot more is stupidly annoying. Hopefully Lionhead can fix some of this with patches and DLC, because the product on the disc is far from what it should have been.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=786</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brooklyn Beats</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=785</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=785#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 02:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Matt &#38; Kim &#8211; Sidewalks I was a big fan of Matt &#38; Kim&#8217;s last release, 2009&#8242;s Grand. So I was curious as to where this drum and keyboard duo could take their sound. In this case they&#8217;ve gone the way of more Urban beats and bouncy synths to deliver their quirky style of indie [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Matt &amp; Kim &#8211; <i>Sidewalks</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TNDQGXPz1_I/AAAAAAAABzk/-DT2XioYtxg/s1600/Sidewalks.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img alt="" border="0" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5535152749776459762" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TNDQGXPz1_I/AAAAAAAABzk/-DT2XioYtxg/s200/Sidewalks.jpg" style="cursor: pointer; float: left; height: 200px; margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; width: 200px;" /></a>I was a big fan of <i>Matt &amp; Kim&#8217;s</i> last release, 2009&#8242;s <i>Grand</i>. So I was curious as to where this drum and keyboard duo could take their sound. In this case they&#8217;ve gone the way of more Urban beats and bouncy synths to deliver their quirky style of indie pop, which is really no surprise.</p>
<p>The new direction for this Brooklyn duo makes sense for their drum and keys setup. Frankly they already had a handful of (though more quaint) similar sounding tunes on their last release, but it doesn&#8217;t always feel as fresh. There aren&#8217;t any breakout singles in the vein of the pep band infused &#8220;Good Ol&#8217; Fashioned Nightmare&#8221; or the urban/indie stylings of &#8220;Daylight&#8221;. The melodies don&#8217;t have the same pop they used to, but there&#8217;s still a lot of innovation here to treat your ears. </p>
<p>The overall sound is as big as the borough it fondly remembers and there&#8217;s a splendor of different and unique sounds sprinkled throughout the mix. There&#8217;s the xylophone like melody that drives &#8220;Cameras&#8221;, the staccato strings of &#8220;Where You&#8217;re Coming From&#8221; and the bright wind chime kind of percussion in &#8220;Ice Melts&#8221; that keep this album moving. Naturally the nerdy vocals of Matt Johnson are still fun and I still admire Kim Schifino&#8217;s great percussion work, so it&#8217;s a nice kind of danceable followup, just not as good as it&#8217;s predecessor.</p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;Block After Block&#8221;, &#8220;Cameras&#8221;, &#8220;Red Paint&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=785</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>110</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>C.A.T: I Should Coco</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=784</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=784#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 17:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CAT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Supergrass &#8211; I Should Coco (1995) Remember when we were doing a &#8220;Classic Album Tuesday&#8221; for every year? Well I&#8217;m bringing it back and I believe we left off at 94&#8242; so here&#8217;s the debut from Supergrass for 95. What happens when you mix frenetic punk music with pop melodies and shrill vocals? You get [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span"  style="font-size:x-large;">Supergrass &#8211; <i>I Should Coco</i> (1995)</span></td>
<td width="150"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TNBN_qBcrkI/AAAAAAAABzc/VUUCZp-Aj2c/s1600/I_Should_Coco.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 200px; height: 199px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TNBN_qBcrkI/AAAAAAAABzc/VUUCZp-Aj2c/s200/I_Should_Coco.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5535009698045800002" /></a>Remember when we were doing a &#8220;Classic Album Tuesday&#8221; for every year? Well I&#8217;m bringing it back and I believe we left off at 94&#8242; so here&#8217;s the debut from <i>Supergrass</i> for 95. What happens when you mix frenetic punk music with pop melodies and shrill vocals? You get <i>Supergrass</i>, a high energy trio from Oxford that&#8217;ll rock yer socks off. From their hit single &#8220;Alright&#8221; to their other genre defying singles <i>I Should Coco</i> is an unpredictable mish mash  of punk/pop inspirations.</p>
<p>I first heard about the group from their song &#8220;Caught by the Fuzz&#8221; featured at the end of <i>Hot Fuzz</i> and soon enough realized they were responsible for the hit song &#8220;Alright&#8221; featured in a handful of commercials a few years ago. They&#8217;re definitely one of those bands that has a definite identity and you can usually spot them from a mile away with Gaz Coombes distinct vocals. At first I found him annoying but somehow I became a fan with time, well suited for this kind of garage rock music.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never really had as much interest in another <i>Supergrass</i> album like &#8220;I Should Coco.&#8221; It just feels fresh and no holds bar, something I never found on future <i>Supergrass</i> releases. The band would go on to record five more albums before calling it quits in 2010, but I&#8217;ll always remember them for this one, you could say its&#8217;&#8230;. &#8220;Alright?&#8221; Ehh?</p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks:</b> &#8220;Alright&#8221;, &#8220;I&#8217;d Like to Know&#8221;, &#8220;Mansized Rooster&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=784</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Undead Air</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=783</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=783#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 17:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Zombies seem to be everywhere these days, hell I went to a zombie convention last weekend. Basically the undead are as popular as ever and what better way to capitalize on that than with the first ever zombie TV show? I was ecstatic when I heard that AMC out of all networks was going to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TM8CbeWFWmI/AAAAAAAABzM/61clsQ8aN4M/s1600/the-walking-dead-tv-cast1.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 201px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TM8CbeWFWmI/AAAAAAAABzM/61clsQ8aN4M/s320/the-walking-dead-tv-cast1.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5534645138087041634" /></a><br />Zombies seem to be everywhere these days, hell I went to a zombie convention last weekend. Basically the undead are as popular as ever and what better way to capitalize on that than with the first ever zombie TV show? I was ecstatic when I heard that AMC out of all networks was going to take on Robert Kirkman&#8217;s graphic novel <i>The Walking Dead</i> and after viewing the pilot, I can proudly say that all my expectations were met. </p>
<p>I read the first installment of Kirkman&#8217;s series last summer and though it didn&#8217;t blow me way, I still found it&#8217;s simple approach and style enjoyable. Definitely plenty to expand on for a series, so it&#8217;s a good jumping off point. Seeing that zombies have been done so many times you don&#8217;t want to overcomplicate anything, keep it simple using atmosphere and character development to suck us in. I mean the zombie concept has been taken on so many times, but how often has it actually been taken on well? This show takes it on and takes it to new heights. </p>
<p>I could explain it in just a few sentences for those who don&#8217;t know. A southern sherif gets shot on the job and awakes from a coma to find the world has been taken over by the undead. Sounds a lot like <i>28 Days Later</i> huh? Surprisingly no, this is a quiet and brooding show that&#8217;s paced slowly and stealthily. Until the end there weren&#8217;t even that many zombies, most of our lead character Rick&#8217;s (Andrew Lincoln&#8217;s) confrontations with corpses were one on one. Oh and I must say the corpses look fantastic in traditional makeup work. </p>
<p>What&#8217;s great about <i>The Walking Dead</i> premiere is that it&#8217;s not as much about zombies as it&#8217;s just about human survival. Almost if the zombies are just props to the desolate setting in which people try to survive in the midst of disaster. There&#8217;s a lot of room for these characters to grow and develop over time and &#8220;time&#8221; this show does take.</p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t of been happier with the premiere of AMC&#8217;s newest and hopefully next big show, it certainly has the potential to attract a large following. Who wouldn&#8217;t want to see a movie quality show that&#8217;s free to show as much blood as they please on basic cable? I can&#8217;t wait for next sunday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=783</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober 2010 Wrap-Up</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=782</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=782#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 08:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nothing much to report here, just calling an end to Shocktober, though I guess you could figure that out by looking at a calendar. Actually I&#8217;m already thinking about what to post next year, if there is a next year and I think I have an idea. Seeing that I finally saw Troll 2 recently, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TM3jxQqzAKI/AAAAAAAABzE/S5iU5uT2W6A/s1600/mum1.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 240px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TM3jxQqzAKI/AAAAAAAABzE/S5iU5uT2W6A/s320/mum1.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5534329952535773346" /></a><br />Nothing much to report here, just calling an end to <i>Shocktober</i>, though I guess you could figure that out by looking at a calendar. Actually I&#8217;m already thinking about what to post next year, if there is a next year and I think I have an idea. Seeing that I finally saw <i>Troll 2</i> recently, I&#8217;ve decided I&#8217;ll devote the next Shocktober to 31 terrible horror movies. It will be rough, but sometimes the hardest movies to watch are the most fun to talk about, that&#8217;s a long way off so I&#8217;ll have time to prepare mentally and physically.</p>
<p>Well that&#8217;s it, I hope everyone has a happy such and such and enjoys all the festivities. I&#8217;ll probably just be doing some studying, watch some movies and than catch the premiere of AMC&#8217;s <i>The Walking Dead</i>, happy haunting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=782</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>100</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 31</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=781</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=781#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 08:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Mist (2007) Dir: Frank Darabont Cast: Thomas Jane, Laurie Holden, Nathan Gamble, Toby Jones, Marcia Gay Harden, Jeffrey DeMunn, Andre Braugher Well here it is, October 31st, All Hallows Eve! A time of the mischief and the macabre, oh yeah and candy. I decided to end this year with Frank Darabont&#8217;s The Mist for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">The Mist (2007)</span></td>
<td width="150"><i"http://sites.google.com/damorgue.org/home/" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TM0pRtgBqQI/AAAAAAAABy8/k4HMyooc__k/s1600/mist-poster.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 218px; height: 320px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TM0pRtgBqQI/AAAAAAAABy8/k4HMyooc__k/s320/mist-poster.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5534124901356644610" /></a><br /><b>Dir: Frank Darabont <br />Cast: Thomas Jane, Laurie Holden, Nathan Gamble, Toby Jones, Marcia Gay Harden, Jeffrey DeMunn, Andre Braugher</b></p>
<p>Well here it is, October 31st, All Hallows Eve! A time of the mischief and the macabre, oh yeah and candy. I decided to end this year with Frank Darabont&#8217;s <i>The Mist</i> for several reasons. 1. Tonight marks the premiere of AMC&#8217;s <i>The Walking Dead</i> which Darabont developed for television 2. Despite positive reviews and a modest run at the box office, I think <i>The Mist</i> is an overlooked and underrated horror film and 3. It&#8217;s one of Stephen King&#8217;s favorite adaptations, that&#8217;s good enough for me. </p>
<p>So it&#8217;s the classic &#8220;A bunch of scared people trapped in a small place&#8221;  premise (In this case a group trapped in a small grocery store) that I&#8217;ve always been a fan of. I find for these kind of stories to excel they often need some strong characters and an intriguing, ever building conflict to keep it interesting. <i>The Mist</i> checks out in both of those categories and then some. The cast is fairly large but every role here serves it&#8217;s purpose no matter how small, like the quote often attributed to Stanislavsky, &#8220;There are no small parts, just small actors.&#8221; I don&#8217;t know who to acknowledge first. You have Marcia Gay Harden as the crazed Bible nut, Toby Jones as the resourceful store clerk, Andre Braugher as the doubting neighbor, not to mention some of Frank Darabont&#8217;s skilled regulars William Sadler and Jeffery DeMunn, there&#8217;s a little something for everybody. </p>
<p>Really it&#8217;s more about the struggle inside than outside, though it is a blast to watch hordes of creepy crawlies come out of the mist and have their ways with the townsfolk. The death&#8217;s are grisly as it could get and it&#8217;s safe to say that this film earned it&#8217;s R-rating. Really the only downfall in mind (Though I&#8217;ll address an issue other viewers have had  soon enough.) is the effects feel cheap. The CGI is some of the weakest CGI I can recall seeing in a mainstream movie in awhile, though it somehow finds it&#8217;s way around it. LIke I said it&#8217;s not really about the monsters, more about the townsfolk acting like monsters, you see what I&#8217;m getting at?</p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TM0pIA-zzaI/AAAAAAAABy0/qeHKgi-8Ix4/s1600/18mcgr-600.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 176px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TM0pIA-zzaI/AAAAAAAABy0/qeHKgi-8Ix4/s320/18mcgr-600.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5534124734787341730" /></a></p>
<p>So what did i mean when I claimed there was a certain &#8220;problem&#8221; many have had with this film? Well it&#8217;s the ending and even I agree it&#8217;s a make it or break it ending. I thought it made perfect sense but many find it far too depressing of a finale. The way I see it is that if Stephen King is all about it, I&#8217;m all about. I&#8217;ve read the short story as well and really that didn&#8217;t even have an ending, so really what were they supposed to do? Well I&#8217;m not sure how much more I can write after doing these reviews 31 days straight, so happy haunting everyone, I&#8217;ll see you next year!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=781</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: ZomBcon 2010</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=780</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=780#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 23:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ZomBcon 2010! What a jewel of a convention this is… A shimmering, bloody, jewel. I&#8217;d never heard of it and judging from the modest crowd it would appear many are as well still unaware. I don&#8217;t even know if it&#8217;s been held before this year, but what a blast my brother Paul and I had [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMyvcuU9Z5I/AAAAAAAAByU/yPZLXSvI7K0/s1600/zombcon.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 194px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMyvcuU9Z5I/AAAAAAAAByU/yPZLXSvI7K0/s320/zombcon.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5533990950138636178" /></a><br />ZomBcon 2010! What a jewel of a convention this is… A shimmering, bloody, jewel. I&#8217;d never heard of it and judging from the modest crowd it would appear many are as well still unaware. I don&#8217;t even know if it&#8217;s been held before this year, but what a blast my brother Paul and I had at this orgy of blood splattered stars. </p>
<p>We arrived at 10:00 through some surprisingly light traffic to  Seattle Center. I managed to nab a fairly close parking spot, but as soon as we arrived we were just like… &#8220;Where is everybody?&#8221; There were no signs or anything, but eventually we found it was all being held in the Seattle Convention Hall, right next to SIFF theater (Duh) and from there on we just followed the zombies. Naturally you had all sorts of silly costumes upon entering. My favorites were the ones that just didn&#8217;t make sense like Indiana Jones and The Joker but there were some great zombie costumes; Zombie Marty McFly and Zombie Big Lebowski, both very nice. Though first priority was to get Bruce Campbell&#8217;s autograph. Opening the event he was clearly the biggest draw and we probably waited in line for a good 90 minutes.</p>
<p>While I was waiting in line Paul snuck out and managed to get a photograph/autograph with Terry Alexander (John from <i>Day of the Dead</i>.)</p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMyuBDynXAI/AAAAAAAABxc/kdGzdsU_uUk/s1600/67634_1512389888992_1211750938_31623316_2789924_n.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 180px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMyuBDynXAI/AAAAAAAABxc/kdGzdsU_uUk/s320/67634_1512389888992_1211750938_31623316_2789924_n.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5533989375352200194" /></a></p>
<p>It took many moons, but finally we got to meet the man they call Bruce and a moment I&#8217;ll forever cherish. And he actually talked to us! I mean like a  real conversation, not just some sign and go operation, he actually asked us about our interests and what not. We told him we were filmmakers, which immediately launched him into imparting his words of wisdom. &#8220;You Know the movie <i>A Simple Plan</i>&#8221; to which I replied &#8220;Yeah I own that.&#8221; and then he told us to watch it with the sound off and than watch <i>Evil Dead II</i> with the sound off. He was really nice and he signed my copy of <i>If Chins Could Kill</i>. Paul commented to Bruce that &#8220;You&#8217;re the only person I know who can make a SciFi Channel movie entertaining.&#8221; To which he chuckled, it was great.</p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMyuZFnW-CI/AAAAAAAABxs/fFS_4ULln4E/s1600/67294_1512390128998_1211750938_31623318_1833105_n.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 180px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMyuZFnW-CI/AAAAAAAABxs/fFS_4ULln4E/s320/67294_1512390128998_1211750938_31623318_1833105_n.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5533989788158720034" /></a></p>
<p>(Bruce imparts us with words of wisdom below)</p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMyuLNvuVMI/AAAAAAAABxk/2InmSHY4Wc0/s1600/73398_1512390289002_1211750938_31623319_5973688_n.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 180px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMyuLNvuVMI/AAAAAAAABxk/2InmSHY4Wc0/s320/73398_1512390289002_1211750938_31623319_5973688_n.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5533989549823120578" /></a></p>
<p>Afterwards I had a good chat with John Amplas, known best for playing the title role in the cult vampire film in <i>Martin</i> (Directed by George A. Romero). He was surprised to see younger people who had seen the movie and I talked about my appreciation of it and all his work and stuff, he was very friendly.</p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMyuoQQQiVI/AAAAAAAABx0/oDAN1PcGFQg/s1600/67793_1512391089022_1211750938_31623325_1054008_n.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 180px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMyuoQQQiVI/AAAAAAAABx0/oDAN1PcGFQg/s320/67793_1512391089022_1211750938_31623325_1054008_n.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5533990048712657234" /></a></p>
<p>A few minutes later Paul got an autograph from the quiet Scott Reiniger from <i>Dawn of the Dead</i>. Him and Paul talked about the movie and he was impressed by our Bruce Campbell autograph for some reason, I didn&#8217;t know he was gonna be there, so it was a surprise. </p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMyuzB9z0CI/AAAAAAAABx8/8myfHZy27V0/s1600/66615_1512391169024_1211750938_31623326_8277300_n.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 180px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMyuzB9z0CI/AAAAAAAABx8/8myfHZy27V0/s320/66615_1512391169024_1211750938_31623326_8277300_n.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5533990233855741986" /></a></p>
<p>Then we went to Dicks… Not much to say about that, except that it&#8217;s alway awesome.</p>
<p>Coming back we saw Bruce Campbell doing a hilarious Q&#038;A, he always has the best wise ass answers, I could watch him forever. During it I noticed there was basically no line for who else but Malcolm McDowell. I got his autograph/photograph and told him I liked the episode of <i>South Park</i> he was on. Seems like it took him a minute to remember even doing it, pretty funny. He had pictures basically from every movie/TV show he&#8217;d ever done.</p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMywSBz1NcI/AAAAAAAAByk/0hWj8G-5ZWQ/s1600/75638_1512391289027_1211750938_31623327_2907517_n.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 180px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMywSBz1NcI/AAAAAAAAByk/0hWj8G-5ZWQ/s320/75638_1512391289027_1211750938_31623327_2907517_n.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5533991865901462978" /></a></p>
<p>We rounded out the day with an autograph and photo opp. from who else but &#8220;The Grandfather of the Zombie&#8221; George A. Romero. Surprisingly it only took us like five minutes to get our opportunity to meet him. We told him that we were &#8220;filmmakers&#8221; ourself and found him to be a great inspiration. He was flattered and asked us about our film… So I got to talk to George A. Romero about <i>McTrigger.</i> A very casual and now grandfatherly kind of guy. </p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMywK47QdsI/AAAAAAAAByc/KdLzZwabIb0/s1600/74542_1512391409030_1211750938_31623328_1135934_n.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 180px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMywK47QdsI/AAAAAAAAByc/KdLzZwabIb0/s320/74542_1512391409030_1211750938_31623328_1135934_n.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5533991743257605826" /></a></p>
<p>In a way ZomBcon is Seattle&#8217;s best kept little secret. Good guests with moderate crowds and great content. All the celebs were modest and it was just a very warm and enjoyable experience, I&#8217;m without a doubt going back next year and the year after and then when I die I&#8217;ll rise from the dead, so I can keep going and going… And going.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=780</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 30</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=779</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=779#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 07:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Ring (2002) Dir: Gore VerbinskiCast: Naomi Watts, Martin Henderson, David Dorfman, Brian Cox, Daveigh ChaseBasically this one follows the same plot as Scary Movie 3 except it&#8217;s not an abomination against god, but seriously The Ring has become one of the few horror highlights of the last decade with it&#8217;s disturbing images and mysterious [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">The Ring (2002)</span></td>
<td width="150"><i"http://sites.google.com/damorgue.org/home/" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMvFi1VsJXI/AAAAAAAABxU/Zov0q94aMfQ/s1600/Theringpostere.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 217px; height: 320px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMvFi1VsJXI/AAAAAAAABxU/Zov0q94aMfQ/s320/Theringpostere.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5533733769379063154" /></a><br /><b>Dir: Gore Verbinski<br />Cast: Naomi Watts, Martin Henderson, David Dorfman, Brian Cox, Daveigh Chase</b><br />Basically this one follows the same plot as <i>Scary Movie 3</i> except it&#8217;s not an abomination against god, but seriously <i>The Ring</i>  has become one of the few horror highlights of the last decade with it&#8217;s disturbing images and mysterious franchise mascot Samara (Daveigh Chase.) Based off of the Japanese film, based off the novel by Koji Suzuki, <i>The Ring</i> is the ultimate moody thriller that when released felt fresh and unique in a genre that so often goes stale. </p>
<p>Set in and filmed around Washington state including such locations as; Seattle, Bellingham, Whidbey Island, Monroe, Port Townshend and even Stanhood (Stanwood) <i>The Ring</i> will always have a place in the hearts of Washingtonians like myself. I never realized how endlessly depressing and terrifying Washington looked, but it&#8217;s all there on screen. </p>
<p>For those who don&#8217;t know, the film concerns a video tape that when watched kills you seven days later. Naomi Watts is investigating the taboo ape when uh oh, her son watches it! So now she must break the curse and discover what these bizarre images mean. Who is this girl on the tape? What happened to her? It&#8217;s a thrilling mystery that&#8217;ll constantly keep you guessing and on the edge of your street. </p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMvFcDvA7bI/AAAAAAAABxM/GZDf8L8NEHk/s1600/the-ring-samara-from-television.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 300px; height: 179px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMvFcDvA7bI/AAAAAAAABxM/GZDf8L8NEHk/s320/the-ring-samara-from-television.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5533733652984294834" /></a></p>
<p><i>The Ring</i> would go on to popularize Japanese horror films or &#8220;J-Horror&#8221; is it&#8217;s sometimes referred to on Wikipedia and there&#8217;s been a whole slew of remakes since then; <i>The Grudge</i>, <i>Dark Water</i>, <i>Pulse</i>, <i>One Missed Call</i>. The only other one I&#8217;ve seen is <i>The Grudge</i> which sucked, although it did have Bill Pullman playing a guy named Peter Kirk (The same name of the founder of Kirkland, WA). <i>The Ring</i> had a sequel but it&#8217;s attempt to clarify more things in the series only made it less interesting. You always have to keep some of the mystery, keep em guessing even after it&#8217;s over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=779</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 29</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=778</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=778#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Dusk Till Dawn (1996) Dir: Robert Rodriguez Cast: George Clooney, Quentin Tarantino, Harvey Keitel, Juliette Lewis, Ernest Liu, Cheech Marin. Salma Hayek, Tom Savini, Fred WilliamsonHot off of the success of Pulp Fiction what was Tarantino going to do? Another hard boiled pulp crime film? How about a gory a vampire fest? I don&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">From Dusk Till Dawn (1996)</span></td>
<td width="150"><i"http://sites.google.com/damorgue.org/home/" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMpy0eM7V9I/AAAAAAAABxE/_AM0d-fqyOY/s1600/From_dusk_till_dawn_poster.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 223px; height: 320px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMpy0eM7V9I/AAAAAAAABxE/_AM0d-fqyOY/s320/From_dusk_till_dawn_poster.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5533361337964124114" /></a><br /><b>Dir: Robert Rodriguez <br />Cast: George Clooney, Quentin Tarantino, Harvey Keitel, Juliette Lewis, Ernest Liu, Cheech Marin. Salma Hayek, Tom Savini, Fred Williamson</b><br />Hot off of the success of <i>Pulp Fiction</i> what was Tarantino going to do? Another hard boiled pulp crime film? How about a gory a vampire fest? I don&#8217;t think anyone was expecting that to happen. Joining forces with Robert Rodriguez, Tarantino penned this supernatural thriller that&#8217;s half crime drama/monster movie and all kinds of awesome. </p>
<p>What&#8217;s really strange about <i>From Dusk TIll Dawn</i> is that it&#8217;s almost like it&#8217;s two movies. The first half involving the Gecko Brothers (George Clooney and Quentin Tarantino) kidnapping the Fuller family (Harvey Keitel, Juliette Lewis and Ernest Liu) lasts for quite awhile and it&#8217;s actually really engaging. Personally I think it&#8217;s even better than the purposefully off-the-wall second half, but that is what makes it a horror film and it&#8217;s undeniably entertaining. Basically I like to think of it has two half finished moves that got crammed together, it could&#8217;ve been more cohesive but it&#8217;s still fun for what it is. </p>
<p>Tarantino&#8217;s dialogue as usual is a delightful array of witty insights and well placed profanity that comes to life through the larger than life characters. You got Seth Gecko (Clooney) as the badass antihero, Harvey Keitel as the Preacher who&#8217;s lost faith, Fred Williamson as the hardened Vietnam vet, Tom Savini as the biker warrior… And they&#8217;re all up to their knees in blood, guts, and vampire strippers.</p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMpyniH11bI/AAAAAAAABw8/VdgtIPjJ9HE/s1600/blog_00172_from_dusk_till_dawn_voted_top_movie_bikini_moment.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 199px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMpyniH11bI/AAAAAAAABw8/VdgtIPjJ9HE/s320/blog_00172_from_dusk_till_dawn_voted_top_movie_bikini_moment.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5533361115678234034" /></a></p>
<p>I have the screenplay to this one at home and constantly reference it to remember clever scenes and monologues. Reading a Tarantino screenplay is almost as good as watching an actual Tarantino movie. He would of course revisit horror to some extent teaming up with Rodriguez again to do <i>Grindhouse</i>, which although a little tiring was still entertaining. So will Tarantino ever do horror again? I don&#8217;t think he really needs to, he&#8217;s made his contributions and they won&#8217;t be forgotten.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=778</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>T3: The Best of the Treehouse of Horror</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=777</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=777#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 08:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Ten]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I couldn&#8217;t go the whole Halloween season without at least one &#8220;Top Ten Thursday&#8221; list so I opted for one that I believe I&#8217;m knowledgable enough on. The Simpsons&#8221; &#8220;Treehouse of Horror&#8221;, what a treat it is every year to get this spooktacular special, at least it was back when The Simpsons was a quality [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMpQLdm5fVI/AAAAAAAABu8/ndm45tinNjU/s1600/SimpsonsHalloween.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 240px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMpQLdm5fVI/AAAAAAAABu8/ndm45tinNjU/s320/SimpsonsHalloween.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5533323250034638162" /></a><br />I couldn&#8217;t go the whole Halloween season without at least one &#8220;Top Ten Thursday&#8221; list so I opted for one that I believe I&#8217;m knowledgable enough on. <i>The Simpsons&#8221;</i> &#8220;Treehouse of Horror&#8221;, what a treat it is every year to get this spooktacular special, at least it was back when <i>The Simpsons</i> was a quality show. In more recent years it really hasn&#8217;t been the same and it doesn&#8217;t help that it will usually falls on November these days, due to the World Series. Anyways, I can confidently say that the first 9 or 10 &#8220;Treehouse of Horror&#8221; specials were solid. As a matter of fact I&#8217;d be willing to say my top 5 are all basically in a five way tie for first place, tough decisions. Oh and to clarify things, I&#8217;m only doing individual segments, not entire specials, enjoy. </p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMpQhZGk1eI/AAAAAAAABvE/TbO5YqGR5VE/s1600/treehouse8.JPG"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 234px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMpQhZGk1eI/AAAAAAAABvE/TbO5YqGR5VE/s320/treehouse8.JPG" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5533323626782447074" /></a><br /><b>10. Nightmare on Evergreen Terrace</b><br /><b>From:</b> Treehouse of Horror VI (10/29/95)<br /><b>Written by:</b> Steve Tompkins <br /><b>Premise:</b> A deceased Groundskeeper Willie seeks vengeance on Springfield Elementary by killing students in their dreams a la <i>Nightmare on Elm Street.</i><br /><b>Why?:</b>  Willie seems to be a favorite for Halloween episodes and this may be his crowning Halloween moment. The scene where he burns to death during a PTA meeting is just hilarious and he can be pretty scary when he wants to be. <br /><b>Memorable Dialogue:</b><br /><b>Marge:</b> It all started on the thirteenth hour, of the thirteenth day, of the thirteenth month.  We were there to discuss the misprinted calendars the school had purchased.<br /><b>Homer:</b> [shivering, looking at the calendar] Oh, lousy Smarch weather.</p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMpQ7KYZKLI/AAAAAAAABvM/jS5GYXtd8Gc/s1600/thesimpsons_fly.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 240px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMpQ7KYZKLI/AAAAAAAABvM/jS5GYXtd8Gc/s320/thesimpsons_fly.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5533324069507246258" /></a><br /><b>9. Fly vs. Fly</b><br /><b>From:</b> Treehouse of Horror VIII (10/26/97)<br /><b>Written by:</b> David X. Cohen<br />Premise: <i>The Simpsons</i> acquire a transporter device from a yard sale and Bart transforms into a monster in this tribute to <i>The Fly (1958)</i><br /><b>Why?:</b> Even though it&#8217;s a Bart segment, I think it&#8217;s the Homer moments that make this episode. His uninterested reactions to such fantastical things. &#8220;Emm… Two bucks… And… It only transports matter?… Um… Well ah… I&#8217;ll give you thirty five cents.&#8221;<br /><b>Memorable Dialogue:</b><br /><b>Homer:</b> Man, how&#8217;d I ever live without this thing? <br />(puts arm into transporter one, arm comes out of matter transporter unit two which is in the kitchen by the refrigerator. He reaches inside and accidentally grabs a can of cat ear medicine.) <br /><b>Homer:</b> Euuuuaagh.. blewww.. ohhh.. oh, man that&#8217;s good.</p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMpRISHBdUI/AAAAAAAABvU/el0O_zyQ4GQ/s1600/treehouse6.JPG"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 233px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMpRISHBdUI/AAAAAAAABvU/el0O_zyQ4GQ/s320/treehouse6.JPG" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5533324294920172866" /></a><br /><b>8. Terror at 5 1/2 Feet</b><br /><b>From:</b> Treehouse of Horror IV (10/28/93)<br /><b>Written by:</b> Bill Oakley and Josh Weinstein <br /><b>Premise:</b> A spoof of the <i>The Twilight Zone</i> episode &#8220;Nightmare at 20,000 Feet&#8221; Bart tries to warn the bus passengers of a gremlin on the side of the bus.<br /><b> Why?:</b> The Twilight Zone is always ripe for parody and no one can parody better than The Simpsons. I mean it&#8217;s so ridiculous that only Bart could see a Gremlin on a school bus. It&#8217;s fun to see a whole segment in just one location and what jokes can be made in that situation. I believe this was Uter&#8217;s first appearance as well, offering his bag of Marzipan Joy-Joys, Mit Iodine!<br /><b>Memorable Dialogue:</b><br /><b>Principal Skinner:</b> Hello, Simpson.  I&#8217;m riding the bus today because Mother hid my car keysto punish me for talking to a woman on the phone.  She was right to do it.</p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMpRXLDN9SI/AAAAAAAABvc/JJejd1YaOLs/s1600/SimpsonsCafeteria-thumb-330x174-26462.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 169px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMpRXLDN9SI/AAAAAAAABvc/JJejd1YaOLs/s320/SimpsonsCafeteria-thumb-330x174-26462.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5533324550723204386" /></a><br /><b>7. The Nightmare Cafeteria</b><br /><b>From:</b> Treehouse of Horror V (10/30/94)<br /><b>Written by:</b> David X. Cohen<br /><b>Premise:</b> Overcrowding at Springfield Elementary causes the staff to resort murder and cannibalism.<br /><b> Why?:</b> Some great visual gags here with such sights as; the fattened faculty, the &#8220;free range&#8221; children and a book entitled &#8220;The Joy of Cooking Milhouse.&#8221;<br /><b>Memorable Dialogue:</b> <br /><b>Lisa:</b> Bart, does it strike you as odd that Uter disappeared and suddenly they&#8217;re serving us this mysterious food called &#8220;Uterbraten&#8221;?<br /><b>Skinner:</b> Oh, relax, kids, I&#8217;ve got a &#8220;gut&#8221; feeling Uter is around here somewhere. After all, isn&#8217;t there a little &#8220;Uter&#8221; in all of us? In fact, you might even say we just &#8220;ate&#8221; Uter and he&#8217;s in our &#8220;stomachs&#8221; right now!  Ha, ha, Wait&#8230; scratch that one.</p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMpRe_HQXVI/AAAAAAAABvk/j2vrTxQ4TNo/s1600/King+Homer.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 255px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMpRe_HQXVI/AAAAAAAABvk/j2vrTxQ4TNo/s320/King+Homer.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5533324684957867346" /></a><br /><b>6. King Homer</b><br /><b>From:</b> Treehouse of Horror III (10/29/92)<br /><b>Written by:</b> Jay Kogen and Wallace Wolodarsky <br /><b>Premise:</b> A classic retelling of the 30s classic with Homer as the beast and Marge as the beauty.<br /><b> Why?:</b> A heartfelt ode to the original with some great nods to the 30s. My favorite gag being a newspaper with a headline that says &#8220;Dick Cavett Born!&#8221; With a picture of him as an adult. <br /><b>Memorable Dialogue:</b><br /><b>Carl:</b> Hey, I heard we&#8217;re goin&#8217; to Ape Island.<br /><b>Lenny:</b> Yeah, to capture a giant ape.<br /><b>Carl:</b> I wish we were going to Candy Apple Island.<br /><b>Charlie:</b> Candy Apple Island? What do they got there?<br /><b>Carl:</b> Apes. But they&#8217;re not so big.</p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMpRmtmJ7zI/AAAAAAAABvs/T_MpohK7bEU/s1600/SimpsonsDialZfor+Zombies-thumb-330x238-26455.png"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 231px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMpRmtmJ7zI/AAAAAAAABvs/T_MpohK7bEU/s320/SimpsonsDialZfor+Zombies-thumb-330x238-26455.png" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5533324817694584626" /></a><br /><b>5. Dial &#8216;Z&#8217; for Zombies</b><br /><b>From:</b> Treehouse of Horror III (10/29/92)<br /><b>Written by:</b> Sam Simon, Jon Vitti <br /><b>Premise:</b> Bart tries to bring back Lisa&#8217;s dead cat using the Book of the dead but accidentally summons a hoard of brain hungry zombies.<br /><b> Why?:</b> Zombies are so malleable for comedies so in <i>The Simpson&#8217;s</i> hands it was sure to be a success. I&#8217;ll always love when Homer kills zombie flanders to which he responds, &#8220;He was a zombie?&#8221;<br /><b>Memorable Dialogue:</b><br /><b>Lisa:</b>  Dad, we did something very bad!<br /><b>Homer:</b> Did you wreck the car?<br /><b>Bart:</b> No!<br /><b>Homer:</b> Did you raise the dead?<br /><b>Lisa:</b> Yes!<br /><b>Homer:</b> But the car&#8217;s okay?<br /><b>Kids:</b> Uh-huh.<br /><b>Homer:</b> All right then.</p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMpSP8dRsyI/AAAAAAAABv0/gOtxUg6_poo/s1600/dracuBurns.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 221px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMpSP8dRsyI/AAAAAAAABv0/gOtxUg6_poo/s320/dracuBurns.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5533325526058513186" /></a><br /><b>4. Bart Simpson&#8217;s Dracula</b><br /><b>From:</b> Treehouse of Horror IV (10/28/93)<br /><b>Written by:</b> Bill Canterbury<br /><b>Premise:</b> <i>The Simpsons</i> are invited to Mr. Burns castle in &#8220;Pennsylvania!&#8221; where part is turned into a vampire.<br /><b> Why?:</b> It&#8217;s amazing how much they can do in like five minutes, it almost feels like a whole episode. It&#8217;s well paced with no shortage of jokes. <br /><b>Memorable Dialogue:</b><br /><b>Kent Brockman:</b> Another local peasant has been found dead &#8212; drained of his blood with two teeth marks on his throat.  This black cape was found on the scene.<br />[Cape has "DRACULA" written on it]<br /><b>Kent Brockman:</b> Police are baffled.<br /><b>Chief Wiggum:</b> We think we&#8217;re dealing with a supernatural being, most likely a mummy.  As a precaution, I&#8217;ve ordered the Egyptian wing of the Springfield museum destroyed.</p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMpSapovs3I/AAAAAAAABv8/6PKBv8fG1l8/s1600/5191309_std.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 242px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMpSapovs3I/AAAAAAAABv8/6PKBv8fG1l8/s320/5191309_std.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5533325709984904050" /></a><br /><b>3. Clown Without Pity</b><br /><b>From:</b> Treehouse of Horror III (10/29/92)<br /><b>Written by:</b> Al Jean and Mike Reiss <br /><b>Premise:</b> Forgetting Bart&#8217;s birthday, Homer rushes out and buys him a doll&#8230; With dire consequences.<br /><b> Why?:</b> Homer is no stranger to pain, so seeing him beat up by a miniature Krusty only makes that pain so much sweeter. <br /><b>Memorable Dialogue:</b><br /><b>Homer:</b> Marge, Marge the dolls trying to kill me and the toasters been laughing at me!</p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMpSm8z869I/AAAAAAAABwE/s1ZNx9ca69A/s1600/toaster.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 256px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMpSm8z869I/AAAAAAAABwE/s1ZNx9ca69A/s320/toaster.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5533325921290611666" /></a><br /><b>2.  Time and Punishment</b><br /><b>From:</b> Treehouse of Horror V (10/30/94)<br /><b>Written by:</b> Greg Daniels and Dan McGrath <br /><b>Premise:</b> In an attempt to fix his toaster, Homer accidentally becomes the first non-Brazilian man to travel back in time.<br /><b> Why?:</b> Time travel can be a blast if approached humorously and who makes a better time traveler than Homer? His moronic observations are timeless, possibly making this the most quotable addition on this list. Traveling back to the jurassic era and commenting &#8220;I&#8217;ve travelled back to a time where dinosaurs weren&#8217;t just confined to zoos?&#8221; I mean he already acts confused enough in his own world, so this only made it more perfect. <br /><b>Memorable Dialogue:</b><br /><b>Homer:</b> You know, Marge, I&#8217;ve had my share of troubles, but sitting here now with you and the kids in our cozy home in this beautiful free country&#8230;it just makes me feel that I&#8217;m really a lucky guy.<br /><b>Lisa:</b> Dad! Your hand is jammed in the toaster!</p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMpSz36PvwI/AAAAAAAABwM/rdCdDZ6n7eY/s1600/treehouse7.JPG"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 235px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMpSz36PvwI/AAAAAAAABwM/rdCdDZ6n7eY/s320/treehouse7.JPG" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5533326143313133314" /></a><br /><b>1. The Shinning</b><br /><b>From:</b> Treehouse of Horror V (10/30/94)<br /><b>Written by:</b> Bob Cushell <br /><b>Premise:</b> <i>The Simpsons</i> become the new caretakers of Mr. Burn&#8217;s winter lodge, but with no beer and TV, Homer begins to lose it. <br /><b> Why?:</b> ; I guess this solidifies Treehouse of Horror V as the best Simpson&#8217;s Halloween special in my eyes. So why did I pick this pitch perfect parody as number one? Maybe because it contains some of Homer&#8217;s best moments. Were talking about a Homer that&#8217;s completely insane and homicidal cause no beer and no TV make Homer go something, something. <br /><b>Memorable Dialogue:</b><br /><b>Mr. Burns:</b> Oh, goody: the Sea Monkeys I ordered have arrived.  Heh heh, heh, look at them cavort and caper.<br /><b>Smithers:</b> Sir, they&#8217;re the new winter caretakers for the lodge.<br /><b>Mr. Burns:</b> Yes&#8230;they work hard and they play hard.</p>
<p><b>Worst (So Far)</b><br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMpTZXn3OoI/AAAAAAAABwU/tahXM1-4FIU/s1600/jabf16_24_heck_house.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 240px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMpTZXn3OoI/AAAAAAAABwU/tahXM1-4FIU/s320/jabf16_24_heck_house.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5533326787481123458" /></a><br /><b>5. Heck House</b><br /><b>From:</b>Treehouse of Horror XVIII (11/4/07)<br /><b>Written by:</b> Marc Wilmore<br /><b>Premise:</b> Angered at the havoc created by mischievous trick-or-treaters, Flanders builds a spook house that is made powerful by the lord. <br /><b> Why?:</b> It feels so rushed and misguided, Flanders has strayed so far from his original goody two shoes image into a judgmental ultra conservative, for shame. </p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMpTiCmFr3I/AAAAAAAABwc/iD2dUEs5Gmw/s1600/1356.21.4.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 230px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMpTiCmFr3I/AAAAAAAABwc/iD2dUEs5Gmw/s320/1356.21.4.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5533326936455360370" /></a><br /><b>4. Dial &#8216;M&#8217; for Murder or Press &#8216;#&#8217; to Return to Main Menu</b><br /><b>From:</b> Treehouse of Horror XX (10/18/09)<br /><b>Written by:</b> Daniel Chun <br /><b>Premise:</b> Bart and Lisa become involved in a &#8220;criss-cross&#8221; murder situation where they each must murder the other&#8217;s teacher, but Lisa can&#8217;t do it.<br /><b> Why?:</b> I bet they felt real clever after coming up with that stupid title. Obviously this a Hitchcock parody but the setup is ridiculous and the jokes are nonexistent. All style and no substance.</p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMpTpnmDbYI/AAAAAAAABwk/gdvVWdSkLSA/s1600/images.jpeg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 255px; height: 191px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMpTpnmDbYI/AAAAAAAABwk/gdvVWdSkLSA/s320/images.jpeg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5533327066646408578" /></a><br /><b>3. Frinkenstein</b><br /><b>From:</b> Treehouse of Horror XIV (10/2/03)<br /><b>Written by:</b> John Swartzwelder<br /><b>Premise:</b> Professor Frink reanimates his dead father (played by Jerry Lewis) who goes on a maniacal spree, stealing body parts.<br /><b> Why?:</b> It&#8217;s just a bunch of gross imagery with a very underwhelming performance from Jerry Lewis. </p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMpTxqhsVDI/AAAAAAAABws/thqhAQEfXUE/s1600/jabf16_18_duell.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 240px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMpTxqhsVDI/AAAAAAAABws/thqhAQEfXUE/s320/jabf16_18_duell.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5533327204872377394" /></a><br /><b>2. Mr. &#038; Mrs. Simpson</b><br /><b>From:</b> Treehouse of Horror XVIII (11/4/07)<br /><b>Written by:</b> Marc Wilmore<br /><b>Premise:</b> Homer and Marge try to get counseling after admitting to being assassins. <br /><b> Why?:</b> What does parodying <i>Mr. and Mrs. Smith</i> have to do with Halloween? It&#8217;s not like its even regarded that highly as a film, but worthy of a parody I guess. So Homer and Marge want to kill each other at one one point but the reasoning behind it is just plan lazy, this really doesn&#8217;t make any sense. </p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMpT4b4yUNI/AAAAAAAABw0/3IBde4KWj5E/s1600/jabf16_09_et_kodos_bart.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 240px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMpT4b4yUNI/AAAAAAAABw0/3IBde4KWj5E/s320/jabf16_09_et_kodos_bart.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5533327321201791186" /></a><br /><b>1. E.T., Go Home</b><br /><b>From:</b> Treehouse of Horror XVIII (11/4/07)<br /><b>Written by:</b> Marc Wilmore<br /><b>Premise:</b> Kodos is stranded on Earth and befriends Bart. <br /><b> Why?:</b> It seems like it would of been no problem spoofing E.T., especially with Kang and Kodos, but these alien invaders have just lost their touch. I mark one moment as being a perfect example of the show&#8217;s downfall and here it is; it has clearly been stated in the past that Kodos is Kang&#8217;s &#8220;Sister&#8221;. So why is there a line where he complains about being hit in the testicles? I&#8217;m not trying to be a nitpicking fanboy but it seems to me that you should at least know the show&#8217;s characters before you start writing for them. It&#8217;s another perfect example of how the current Simpson&#8217;s writers have lost touch with the characters and will do whatever they can to continue the series. Maybe someone should take a hint that if you have to continually distort the timeline and the continuity maybe you should just stop. </p>
<p>Sorry for that sad note but we should be thankful we had about the 10 or so good Simpsons&#8217;s halloween specials we got.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=777</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>107</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 28</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=776</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=776#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 08:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Silence of the Lambs (1991) Dir: Jonathan DemmeCast: Jodie Foster, Anthony Hopkins, Ted Levine, Scott Glenn, Anthony HealdOut of all the film&#8217;s on this list none have as much gold to flaunt as this thriller, by which I mean &#8220;Oscar Gold.&#8221; Best Actor, Best Actress, Best Adapted Screenplay, Best Director, Best Picture… Damn, this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">The Silence of the Lambs (1991)</span></td>
<td width="150"><i"http://sites.google.com/damorgue.org/home/" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMkvi38nBKI/AAAAAAAABu0/zggtYCVgHIM/s1600/The_Silence_of_the_Lambs_poster.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 213px; height: 320px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMkvi38nBKI/AAAAAAAABu0/zggtYCVgHIM/s320/The_Silence_of_the_Lambs_poster.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5533005893381588130" /></a><br /><b>Dir: Jonathan Demme<br />Cast: Jodie Foster, Anthony Hopkins, Ted Levine, Scott Glenn, Anthony Heald</b><br />Out of all the film&#8217;s on this list none have as much gold to flaunt as this thriller, by which I mean &#8220;Oscar Gold.&#8221; Best Actor, Best Actress, Best Adapted Screenplay, Best Director, Best Picture… Damn, this is one helluva of a heavy hitter! I guess it&#8217;s the first horror film to ever win best picture but then I start to think &#8220;Is there a difference between the thriller and horror genre?&#8221; It&#8217;s one of those movies that kind of defies one definite genre. Horror, Thriller, Mystery, Crime Drama, whatever it may be I think we can all agree that this is one disturbing foray into some very dark places. </p>
<p>Based off of Thomas Harris&#8217; bestselling novel, <i>Silence of the Lambs</i> is a story of murder, cannibalism, wearing people&#8217;s skin and all that good stuff. It&#8217;s definitely more subtle thriller than a violent &#8220;in your face&#8221; affair and uses it&#8217;s fascinating characters to suck you into the mayhem. Jodie Foster is fully absorbing as the heroine FBI agent Clarice Starling while Anthony Hopkins is even more engrossing in his most famous and possibly best role to date. What is there to say about Hannibal Lecter? He&#8217;s an excellently crafted portrait of a villainous mastermind and yet he&#8217;s behind bars. What a concept that is and even with a mere 16 minutes of screen time he steals the show. Really he&#8217;s just a supporting character and yet he&#8217;s the most memorable part of the movie, a marvelous performance.</p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMkvaSk1i1I/AAAAAAAABus/O4hEpQyXwGk/s1600/silence_of_the_lambs_gallery--gt_full_width_landscape.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 208px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMkvaSk1i1I/AAAAAAAABus/O4hEpQyXwGk/s320/silence_of_the_lambs_gallery--gt_full_width_landscape.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5533005745910811474" /></a></p>
<p>Though you can&#8217;t count out Buffalo Bill&#8217;s (Ted Levine) portions of the film. The infamous dance to Q Lazzarus&#8217; &#8220;Goodbye Horses&#8221; has to be one of the most striking sequences of the whole film. Not to mention that pit he&#8217;s got down there and his whole &#8220;lotion talk&#8221;. That reminds me of all the great quotes in this movie. Almost too much to talk about so I&#8217;m going to cut this short, I&#8217;m hungry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=776</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Rock of Life</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=775</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=775#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rock Band 3 With Rock Band 3, Harmonix has reached the logical conclusion for music games. Guitar Hero popularized the genre, Rock Band made it a party game, Rock Band 2 showed how one game could be a platform for content. Now they introduce keyboards and a pro mode to teach gamers how to really [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><i>Rock Band 3</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/5.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TMgEQFvovaI/AAAAAAAAA6s/3bLnYeAROLQ/s1600/Rb3_box_art.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TMgEQFvovaI/AAAAAAAAA6s/3bLnYeAROLQ/s200/Rb3_box_art.jpg" width="160" /></a></div>
<p>With <i>Rock Band 3</i>, Harmonix has reached the logical conclusion for music games. <i>Guitar Hero </i>popularized the genre, <i>Rock Band </i>made it a party game, <i>Rock Band 2 </i>showed how one game could be a platform for content. Now they introduce keyboards and a pro mode to teach gamers how to really play their instruments. While I probably won&#8217;t ever actually get to play with the special <i>Rock Band </i>guitar or drums, I am certain that those modes are as competent as everything else in this package, which is easily the greatest music game of all time.</p>
<p>Not that the title was hard to win, since in my mind the previous holder was <i>Rock Band 2</i> (yes, <i>The Beatles: Rock Band</i> was very special too). The way Harmonix has kept the <i>Rock Band </i>platform interesting with DLC while Neversoft has destroyed the <i>Guitar Hero </i>franchise like a <a href="http://technology.todaysbigthing.com/2010/10/26">1,000 lbs pumpkin smashing a car</a>, meant that basically they had to not fuck up <i>Rock Band 3 </i>to make it great. And they did.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll notice things are different right from the get-go. The opening video, usually an exciting CG venture in these games, is this time real life people jamming out in some city. The game&#8217;s interface, usually very clean, has sacrificed some of its sleekness to offer more options. Players can now drop in and out whenever they want (even in the middle of songs) and it is super easy to move what instrument your profile is signed in on or change your character. The process of playing music has never been simpler, and that streamlining makes this the ideal party game.</p>
<p>Since the first game you&#8217;ve always been able to make your own band, but your group has a bigger presence this time around. The members are usually chilling in the background while you mess with options and of course they still are the ones playing the music under the clutter of four instrument tracks and vocals. This gives you the sense that you are always playing as your band, like everything you do counts toward something &#8211; and it does. The other two games had discreet tour and quick play modes, where quick play didn&#8217;t count toward anything but high scores. In <i>Rock Band 3 </i>there still is a tour mode, but you&#8217;ll only have to play a few gigs until you finish a tour. The real focus is on challenges, which you can complete at any time. This was an extremely intelligent design decision, basically giving players the career mode if they wanted, but also making it so it never feels like your time is wasted.</p>
<p>Besides the pro modes (and vocal harmonies, which aren&#8217;t <i>really </i>new) the biggest new addition is the keyboard. The device itself is great, two full octaves of keys that feel like proper keyboard keys that you can wear like a keytar or just sit with it on your lap. You can play using just five keys, which is a lot like playing guitar or bass, or you can play in pro mode, in which you have to use all the keys, which is a lot like actually playing piano. The regular stuff is easy enough to get into, but playing on pro is quite the challenge. I could see people using the game to develop the basic skills to get into playing the real instrument.</p>
<p>So there are 83 songs on the disc. It&#8217;s a pretty crazy mix of songs, with really the only unifying theme being that a lot of them seem to have been chosen because of they&#8217;re keyboard part. Which is good, since none of the existing DLC supports keyboards yet, although supposedly you will be able to upgrade that at some point. I was able to find plenty of songs I love (seriously, &#8220;In a Big Country,&#8221; &#8220;Walk of Life,&#8221; &#8220;25 or 6 to 4,&#8221; &#8220;Space Oddity,&#8221; I could go on) and even the stuff I don&#8217;t care so much for isn&#8217;t that bad. With a great mix on the disc, plus the ability to export most of the songs from <i>Rock Band</i>s 1 and 2, <i>AC/DC, Lego </i>and <i>Green Day</i> and the amazing selection of DLC plus the stuff on Rock Band Network, surely you&#8217;ll find more than enough to keep yourself entertained.</p>
<p>Seriously Harmonix, I don&#8217;t know where you guys go from here. I guess you could try more single band games, but I still think only The Beatles could really get away with that. <i>Rock Band 3 </i>is just too good. You&#8217;re done. Keep putting out DLC. We could still use some My Morning Jacket up in this business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=775</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 27</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=774</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=774#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer (1990) Dir: John McNaughtonCast: Michael Rooker, Tom Towles, Tracy ArnoldThere&#8217;s hundreds of serial killer movies out there but you&#8217;d be hard pressed to find one that&#8217;s more disturbing and realistic than Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer. A controversial indie thriller based on the crimes of the real murderer [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer (1990)</span></td>
<td width="150"><i"http://sites.google.com/damorgue.org/home/" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMfZ6-c682I/AAAAAAAABuk/1BFi8SVHYs4/s1600/henryl.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 224px; height: 320px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMfZ6-c682I/AAAAAAAABuk/1BFi8SVHYs4/s320/henryl.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5532630274467885922" /></a><br /><b>Dir: John McNaughton<br />Cast: Michael Rooker, Tom Towles, Tracy Arnold</b><br />There&#8217;s hundreds of serial killer movies out there but you&#8217;d be hard pressed to find one that&#8217;s more disturbing and realistic than <i>Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer</i>. A controversial indie thriller based on the crimes of the real murderer Henry Lee Lucas, <i>Henry</i> is significantly scarier than any <i>Friday the 13th</i> or <i>Nightmare on Elm Street</i>. This as a real a portrayal of malevolent violence as you&#8217;ll ever see on the screen. </p>
<p>Henry (played marvelously by Michael Rooker)  is a quiet, cold man who enjoys killing people, most notably his own mother. Living with his equally disturbed roommate Otis (Tom Towles) things get awkward when Otis&#8217; sister moves in. It&#8217;s not long after this Henry introduces Otis to his way of life and soon enough the two begin to indulge on a spree of sorts, what follows is simply chaos. </p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMfZqju0LbI/AAAAAAAABuc/SIFy2S7FVVI/s1600/henry-portrait-of-a-serial-killer.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 208px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMfZqju0LbI/AAAAAAAABuc/SIFy2S7FVVI/s320/henry-portrait-of-a-serial-killer.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5532629992417275314" /></a></p>
<p>This film was no stranger to controversy when repeated disagreements  with the MPAA held it back from release. Technically <i>Henry</i> was complete by 1986 but it&#8217;s content made it a hard sell until it finally achieved a limited release in 1990. What happened when it did finally surface? Critical acclaim and a cult following, just goes to show that the MPAA knows nothing. This isn&#8217;t just another slasher it&#8217;s actually closer to a brooding drama with it&#8217;s complex emotions and excellent performances, check it out if you&#8217;re feeling brave.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=774</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 26</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=773</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=773#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 07:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hellraiser (1987) Dir: Clive Barker Cast: Andrew Robinson, Claire Higgins, Ashley Laurence, Sean Chapman, Doug BradleyWhen you think about the big Slasher baddies who comes to mind? Freddy Krueger, Jason Voorhees, Leatherface, and chances are someone will mention Pinhead. I don&#8217;t know exactly how this outer dimensional monster made his way into the mainstream but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Hellraiser (1987)</span></td>
<td width="150"><i"http://sites.google.com/damorgue.org/home/" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMaAW7jTf9I/AAAAAAAABuU/0Ch4dIm-hgI/s1600/Hellraiser_poster.png"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 207px; height: 320px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMaAW7jTf9I/AAAAAAAABuU/0Ch4dIm-hgI/s320/Hellraiser_poster.png" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5532250323702480850" /></a><br /><b>Dir: Clive Barker <br />Cast: Andrew Robinson, Claire Higgins, Ashley Laurence, Sean Chapman, Doug Bradley</b><br />When you think about the big Slasher baddies who comes to mind? Freddy Krueger, Jason Voorhees, Leatherface, and chances are someone will mention Pinhead. I don&#8217;t know exactly how this outer dimensional monster made his way into the mainstream but he&#8217;s been a favorite of horror fans for years. </p>
<p>What makes Pinhead a memorable villain to so many? First of all look at him, he&#8217;s got freaking nails pounded into his head! Then he&#8217;s got all these supernatural powers and he&#8217;s dressed like some S&#038;M fanatic. He&#8217;s certainly a disturbing guy, could disturbed people possibly relate? I don&#8217;t know but he&#8217;s a creepy and completely relentless villain.</p>
<p>Personally I&#8217;ve never had much interest in author Barker&#8217;s style of sadomasochistic violence. People call <i>Saw</i> torture porn, wait until you see the &#8220;Cenobites&#8221; in <i>Hellraiser</i>. Before I go any further let me fill in the uninformed. So <i>Hellraiser</i> is about this prick named Frank who buys an ancient puzzle box in Morocco. Back home in the U.K. Frank solves the puzzles which releases a series of chains that rip him to shreds. These demons called the &#8220;Cenobites&#8221; appear and are like &#8220;Ha ha you&#8217;re dead!&#8221; and put the puzzle back together and leave for some reason. Later Frank&#8217;s brother Larry and his family move in to Frank&#8217;s old house and what happens when Larry cuts himself in the room where Frank died? Well the blood reforms fragments of Franks gored body in a spectacular effects seen. From there on Frank  falls in love with Larry&#8217;s wife, she has to get random men for Frank to consume and reform and blah blah somehow Larry&#8217;s teenage daughter enter&#8217;s Pinhead&#8217;s world and it&#8217;s really violent.</p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMaAJnmUooI/AAAAAAAABuE/SYodGMEhY6Q/s1600/image_rotator.php.jpeg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 180px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMaAJnmUooI/AAAAAAAABuE/SYodGMEhY6Q/s320/image_rotator.php.jpeg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5532250095008129666" /></a></p>
<p>Actually it&#8217;s not a bad story just kind of gross, cruel, and sad. I guess that&#8217;s an effective horror film, but it&#8217;s never resonated with me. I actually think this movie is more notable for some outstanding makeup effects. This is one to check out if you are in a very bitter and dark state of mind, enjoy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=773</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 25</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=772</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=772#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Evil Dead II (1987) Dir: Sam Raimi Cast: Bruce Campbell, Sarah Berry, Danny Hicks, Kassie Wesley, Ted RaimiIs it a remake? Is it a sequel? Whatever it may be it&#8217;s just about one of the most ridiculous horror movies you&#8217;ll ever see. Like if the Three Stooges wandered onto the set of a slasher movie, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Evil Dead II (1987)</span></td>
<td width="150"><i"http://sites.google.com/damorgue.org/home/" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMUu-vBg-VI/AAAAAAAABt0/Be1XVXucfWg/s1600/Evil_Dead_II_poster.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 208px; height: 320px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMUu-vBg-VI/AAAAAAAABt0/Be1XVXucfWg/s320/Evil_Dead_II_poster.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5531879372604111186" /></a><br /><b>Dir: Sam Raimi <br />Cast: Bruce Campbell, Sarah Berry, Danny Hicks, Kassie Wesley, Ted Raimi</b><br />Is it a remake? Is it a sequel? Whatever it may be it&#8217;s just about one of the most ridiculous horror movies you&#8217;ll ever see. Like if the Three Stooges wandered onto the set of a slasher movie, <i>Evil Dead II</i> might be the first of only a few films you could truly categorize as &#8220;Slapstick Horror.&#8221;</p>
<p>After the flop that was <i>Crimewave</i>, Sam Raimi and his motley crew (Bruce Campbell, Scott Spiegel, Robert Taper, etc) decided to return to their roots and revisit the <i>Evil Dead</i> franchise, but now with more money, more effects and more twisted humor. Star Bruce Campbell would take the character of Ash and propel him to cult hero status and did anybody say &#8220;chainsaw arm?&#8221; </p>
<p>So <i>Evil Dead II</i> is supposed to take place where the last one left off, Ash still being trapped at the cabin but it&#8217;s also kind of confusing. They do a flashback sequence that changes details from the first (now it was just Ash and his girlfriend who visited the cabin) I don&#8217;t know whatever, that&#8217;s not really point here is it? What is the point? How about a series of beyond bizarre set pieces that include; Ash fighting his own hand, a sideways fountain of blood, and a house of laughing furniture. It&#8217;s beyond ridiculous and is an all out laugh riot. </p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMUvKxhOt3I/AAAAAAAABt8/SEsyW_s-AB4/s1600/ed-evil-dead-zombie.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 240px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMUvKxhOt3I/AAAAAAAABt8/SEsyW_s-AB4/s320/ed-evil-dead-zombie.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5531879579432433522" /></a></p>
<p>More or less it just took all the best ideas from the first one and kicked them up a notch&#8230; A huge notch! It basically turned the whole franchise into a comedy series and I don&#8217;t think anyone was complaining about that move. It&#8217;s become the ultimate cult movie and I&#8217;m proud to be a part of that cult. From then on it would only get wackier with <i>Army of Darkness</i> but I think this one found the best balance, groovy baby.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=772</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>World Series 2010: Battle Of The Bengie</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=771</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=771#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2010 20:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I still don&#8217;t believe it, I really don&#8217;t. This entire postseason has been one big ball of tortured awesomeness, and I can&#8217;t even describe the feeling I had after seeing Brian Wilson throw that final strike to Ryan Howard last night. There&#8217;s just something about seeing two full-grown men embrace each other in front of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TMSYMlIkG3I/AAAAAAAAA6c/I1xhSARI49s/s1600/giantsnlcs.png"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 259px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TMSYMlIkG3I/AAAAAAAAA6c/I1xhSARI49s/s320/giantsnlcs.png" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5531713584211696498" /></a><br />
<table>
<tbody></tbody>
</table>
<p>I still don&#8217;t believe it, I really don&#8217;t.  This entire postseason has been one big ball of tortured awesomeness, and I can&#8217;t even describe the feeling I had after seeing Brian Wilson throw that final strike to Ryan Howard last night.  There&#8217;s just something about seeing two full-grown men embrace each other in front of a bunch of angry Philly fans. Now they can suck it.
<div></div>
<div>In my experience as a baseball fan, really the only moment that I can compare to last night&#8217;s Giants victory was when I was six years old, watching Randy Johnson strike out the final batter in the &#8217;95 one game playoff.  I guess it&#8217;s because that was the first time &#8220;my team&#8221; had ever reached the playoffs, and this is the first time I&#8217;ve had &#8220;my team&#8221; reach the World Series.  I know the Giants aren&#8217;t really my team, but it just makes me think how incredible it&#8217;ll be when the Mariners finally make it to the World Series, even if it&#8217;ll be a little like inviting an ex-girlfriend to your wedding.</div>
<div></div>
<div>So what now? Well the Giants will be playing the Texas Rangers in the World Series on Wednesday night.  At this point I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s even worth trying to predict how this match-up will turn out.  The Rangers are probably a better all-around team, but as we&#8217;ve seen, this Giants team defies logic.  Their line-up may be the equivalent of baseball&#8217;s unwanted scraps, but they&#8217;ve managed to come up with big hits time after time and right now this team feels unstoppable. </div>
<div></div>
<div>What we&#8217;ve seen throughout this whole season from the Giants of course is how far good pitching can get you, and last night&#8217;s game was just another example of how deep this Giants pitching staff is.  Of course now the Giants will be going up against another solid pitching staff, this one being led by one Cliff Lee.  I don&#8217;t know why, but when the Giants were going up against Halladay, I felt like they still had a chance, but the idea of that Giants line-up going against Cliff Lee kind of scares me.  God I hate rooting against Cliff Lee.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Any way you look at it though, this is an exciting matchup.  These are two fan bases that in the fifty years that their clubs have existed, neither of them have ever won a World Series.  No Yankees, no Red Sox, no Phillies, none of that east coast bullshit.  This is the kind of stuff that makes baseball the greatest game of them all.  Now Go Giants!</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=771</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 24</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=770</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=770#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2010 17:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Fly (1986) Dir: David CronenbergCast: Jeff Goldblum, Geena Davis, John GetzI always like to include at least one original and remake version of the same film in my Shocktober feature so here&#8217;s one that maybe even surpasses the original. What comes to mind when you hear the name David Cronenberg? Exploding heads? Mutant killer [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">The Fly (1986)</span></td>
<td width="150"><i"http://sites.google.com/damorgue.org/home/" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMRqwyCjSLI/AAAAAAAABts/h7IRIXdnDtc/s1600/fly_poster.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 202px; height: 320px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMRqwyCjSLI/AAAAAAAABts/h7IRIXdnDtc/s320/fly_poster.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5531663628616550578" /></a><br /><b>Dir: David Cronenberg<br />Cast: Jeff Goldblum, Geena Davis, John Getz</b><br />I always like to include at least one original and remake version of the same film in my Shocktober feature so here&#8217;s one that maybe even surpasses the original. What comes to mind when you hear the name David Cronenberg? Exploding heads? Mutant killer dwarves? James Woods pulling a gun out of his stomach? He&#8217;s helmed some &#8220;intriguing&#8221; projects&#8221; which in the horror world has given him the nickname of the &#8220;Master of Body-Horror&#8221;. Whether it&#8217;s deformities or mutations or whatever, this film takes that title to the extreme showcasing Cronenberg&#8217;s skills at making our skin crawl… By watching someone else&#8217;s skin crawl.</p>
<p>So the premise is basically kept the same but in a significantly more graphic fashion. Instead of the scientist (this time named Seth Brundle) hiding his deformity we get to follow Jeff Goldblum every step of the way as he mutates from man to monster. Picking out teeth and nails, vomiting on his food to digest it, this film is no holds bar when it comes to showing you ever single detail of Seth&#8217;s terrifying transformation. </p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMRqobQ2oyI/AAAAAAAABtk/C1CKrxrgqhI/s1600/d9fly-431.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 222px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMRqobQ2oyI/AAAAAAAABtk/C1CKrxrgqhI/s320/d9fly-431.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5531663485063570210" /></a></p>
<p>The effects are so absorbing that you often forget about what a great performance Jeff Goldblum is giving under all of it. Or is that the effects  and the man become one so well that it blurs into one engrossing spectacle? Whatever the matter it&#8217;s hard to watch on a full stomach but it&#8217;s also hard to look away. Really you can&#8217;t do the images justice by attempting to describe them, they simply must be seen. On that note I&#8217;ll   wrap it up as I feel the sudden urge to watch <i>The Fly</i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=770</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 23</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=769</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=769#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2010 07:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re-Animator (1985) Dir: Stuart Gordon Cast: Jeffery Combs, Bruce Abbott, Barbara Crampton, David GaleFrom the brilliant mind behind Robot Jox and Space Truckers I bring you &#8220;Re-Animator&#8221;! Seriously though, Stuart Gordon has definitely had a hit or miss career but there&#8217;s no denying that this was his finest hour. Adapted loosely from the H.P. Lovecraft [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Re-Animator (1985)</span></td>
<td width="150"><i"http://sites.google.com/damorgue.org/home/" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMKNIvmHLcI/AAAAAAAABtc/9CRtnwENc7s/s1600/reanimator-poster.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 206px; height: 320px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMKNIvmHLcI/AAAAAAAABtc/9CRtnwENc7s/s320/reanimator-poster.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5531138473719180738" /></a><br /><b>Dir: Stuart Gordon <br />Cast: Jeffery Combs, Bruce Abbott, Barbara Crampton, David Gale</b><br />From the brilliant mind behind <i>Robot Jox</i> and <i>Space Truckers</i> I bring you &#8220;Re-Animator&#8221;! Seriously though, Stuart Gordon has definitely had a hit or miss career but there&#8217;s no denying that this was his finest hour. Adapted loosely from the H.P. Lovecraft story &#8220;Herbert West-Re-animator&#8221; this tongue and cheek puke-o-rama has become a classic with it&#8217;s skin crawling effects and endlessly entertaining anti-hero, mad scientist Herbert West (Jeffery Combs.)</p>
<p>It&#8217;s basically the perfect idea for a horror film. A mad scientist (Herbert West) has created a serum that can &#8220;re-animate&#8221; the dead, the only problem is how these corpses act when revitalized. Struggling to perfect his experiments West moves in with a medical student Dan (Bruce Abbott) and converts the basement into a mad laboratory. What follows is an endless eries of experiments gone wrong, complete with dark humor and off-the-wall violence. </p>
<p>This is a horror film chocked full of gory glee that just happens to have an interesting story under the surface. The conflict and troubles between Dan and Herbert and where it leads them is fairly engrossing. It&#8217;s a bit campy but a lot of it&#8217;s played for humor so I guess thats what they were going for. Though I do enjoy the vintage makeup effects with all it&#8217;s messy goodness.</p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMKM9GR3EAI/AAAAAAAABtU/eRIWy7Ijx-c/s1600/zUZzf0G8Fowuvw5cX73LuPv4o1_500.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 216px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TMKM9GR3EAI/AAAAAAAABtU/eRIWy7Ijx-c/s320/zUZzf0G8Fowuvw5cX73LuPv4o1_500.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5531138273649823746" /></a></p>
<p>An 80s cult classic that&#8217;s spawned a great mad scientist character, this film wouldn&#8217;t be the same without the talented Jeffery Combs. He&#8217;s gone on to play the character in two sequels and there&#8217;s even talk of a fourth installment <i>House of Re-Animator</i> where West would move into the white house to re-animate the vice president (George Wendt) and William H. Macy would play the president. Sounds dumb but I&#8217;m glad to see re-animator still lives on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=769</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 22</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=768</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=768#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 07:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fright Night (1985) Dir: Tom HollandCast: William Ragsdale, Roddy McDowall, Chris Sarandon, Amanda Bearse, Stephen Geoffreys, Jonathan StarkCharley Brewster (William Ragsdale) is your typical horror movie buff. He loves the classics and loves the late-night Horror movie show &#8220;Fright Night&#8221; hosted by self proclaimed, legendary, vampire hunter Peter Vincent (Roddy McDowall.) But what happens when [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Fright Night (1985)</span></td>
<td width="150"><i"http://sites.google.com/damorgue.org/home/" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TME4S2IRRgI/AAAAAAAABtE/VXBC4ibps7k/s1600/fright-night-movie-poster12.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 202px; height: 320px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TME4S2IRRgI/AAAAAAAABtE/VXBC4ibps7k/s320/fright-night-movie-poster12.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5530763713806681602" /></a><br /><b>Dir: Tom Holland<br />Cast: William Ragsdale, Roddy McDowall, Chris Sarandon, Amanda Bearse, Stephen Geoffreys, Jonathan Stark</b><br />Charley Brewster (William Ragsdale) is your typical  horror movie buff. He loves the classics and loves the late-night Horror movie show &#8220;Fright Night&#8221; hosted by self proclaimed, legendary, vampire hunter Peter Vincent (Roddy McDowall.) But what happens when his own life becomes a horror movie? For one night he gets a peek at his new neighbor Jerry (Chris Sarandon) and soon enough discovers, Jerry is a vampire. </p>
<p><i>Fright Night</i> could of been another typical, gory, horror flick in a decade where those were a dime a dozen (still are I guess.) Luckily this film went for dark humor and is a thrill with such entertaining characters. Charley is a very likable guy and Peter Vincent, which he somehow gets to team up with him is hilariously pathetic. Jerry the Vampire is the perfect amount of suave and sinister and his right hand man Billy (Jonathan Stark) is my favorite, he just jokes around even right before his demise. The lovely Amanda Bearse and shrill Stephen Geofferys round out the cast as Charley&#8217;s girlfriend and annoying pal respectively and they&#8217;re all part of one crazy romp.</p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TME4cq09VVI/AAAAAAAABtM/jWYUCLGnb-c/s1600/frightnight051707.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 213px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TME4cq09VVI/AAAAAAAABtM/jWYUCLGnb-c/s320/frightnight051707.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5530763882571584850" /></a></p>
<p>Though the film is not without it&#8217;s scares. There&#8217;s some great puss spewing moments of monster madness and the effects work is all out gruesome fun. Writer/Director Tom Holland  (Also the director of the hit <i>Child&#8217;s Play</i>) has great sensibilities when it comes to both comedy or horror, at least in this film. Make sure you see it before the remake starring; Anton Yelchin, Colin Farrel and McLovin is released in Fall 2011, I&#8217;m sure it will be a disappointment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=768</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 21</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=767</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=767#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 07:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Creepshow (1982) Dir: George A. RomeroCast: Hal Holbrook, Adrienne Barbeau, E.G. Marshall, Ed Harris, Leslie Nielsen, Ted Danson, Stephen King, Fritz Weaver: EC Comics a.k.a Entertaining Comics produced some of the most controversial comics of the Late 40s to Early 50s. Titles like Tales from the Crypt , The Vault of Horror, and Weird Science, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Creepshow (1982)</span></td>
<td width="150"><i"http://sites.google.com/damorgue.org/home/" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TL_v54-6umI/AAAAAAAABsM/uERgWRKBkAI/s1600/CreepshowPoster.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 210px; height: 320px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TL_v54-6umI/AAAAAAAABsM/uERgWRKBkAI/s320/CreepshowPoster.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5530402645262121570" /></a><br /><b>Dir: George A. Romero<br />Cast: Hal Holbrook, Adrienne Barbeau, E.G. Marshall, Ed Harris, Leslie Nielsen, Ted Danson, Stephen King, Fritz Weaver</b><br />: EC Comics a.k.a Entertaining Comics produced some of the most controversial comics of the Late 40s to Early 50s. Titles like <i>Tales from the Crypt</i> , <i>The Vault of Horror</i>, and <i>Weird Science</i>, were all cult classics, but suffered a severe backlash due to their violent and adult content. Unfortunately those titles didn&#8217;t last long after their battle against censorship, but in 1982 they were remembered once more by two guys by the names of Stephen King and George A. Romero. </p>
<p>The film was called <i>Creepshow</i> and it was an all out tribute to E.C. Comics. An anthology film, King would provide the stories in the style of E.C. while George A. Romero (<i>Night of the Living Dead</i>, <i>Dawn of the Dead</i>) would take the helm as director. The result was a comic book come to life with big laughs, big scares, big twists and style oozing out of every rotted orophus. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll split up the rest of the review by simply commenting on each segment.</p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TL_yO5hGJFI/AAAAAAAABs0/r8EGnCbWQH8/s1600/creepshow3.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 213px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TL_yO5hGJFI/AAAAAAAABs0/r8EGnCbWQH8/s320/creepshow3.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5530405205205984338" /></a><br /><b>- Father&#8217;s Day:</b> A man (Jon Lormer) killed on Father&#8217;s Day by his daughter Bedelia (Viveca Lindfors) rises from the dead to seek vengeance and some cake that he never got. Probably my least favorite segment but it&#8217;s very brief, so no real complaints just typical shocker stuff.</p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TL_yHuUYLPI/AAAAAAAABss/0DQ5ginX5XA/s1600/creepshow-still.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 178px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TL_yHuUYLPI/AAAAAAAABss/0DQ5ginX5XA/s320/creepshow-still.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5530405081940765938" /></a><br /><b>- The Lonesome Death Of Jordy Verill:</b> King himself stars as the title character who after touching a meteorite starts to grow vegetation all over his body. It&#8217;s more comedic in tone but ends on a dark note and King is actually pretty entertaining.</p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TL_yBsKle9I/AAAAAAAABsk/ru50CTZPegM/s1600/creepshow06.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 180px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TL_yBsKle9I/AAAAAAAABsk/ru50CTZPegM/s320/creepshow06.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5530404978283609042" /></a><br /><b>- Something to Tide You Over:</b> Mad at his unfaithful wife (Gaylen Ross), Richard Vickers (Leslie Nielsen) buries her and her lover Harry (Ted Danson) up to their necks in sand right before high tide! But what happens when one night they come back? This one is probably the freakiest and is made even freakier by the unusually dramatic performance from Leslie Nielsen.</p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TL_x57A_AyI/AAAAAAAABsc/x4j53B_B3Uc/s1600/20090214-203743.JPG"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 185px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TL_x57A_AyI/AAAAAAAABsc/x4j53B_B3Uc/s320/20090214-203743.JPG" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5530404844830917410" /></a><br /><b>- The Crate:</b> Henry Northup (Hal Holbrook) is a college professor unhappily married to the insufferable Wilma (Adrienne Barbeau). Wishing for a change of scenery, tables turn when Henry comes into possession of a crate containing a rare and dangerous animal. Easily the best segment for it&#8217;s humor, performances and creature effects, <i>The Crate</i> is the highlight of the film.</p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TL_xpN6oo9I/AAAAAAAABsU/W172xw9oYNI/s1600/Creepshow_sized.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 175px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TL_xpN6oo9I/AAAAAAAABsU/W172xw9oYNI/s320/Creepshow_sized.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5530404557846782930" /></a><br /><b>- They&#8217;re Creeping Up on You:</b> Upson Pratt (E.G. Marshall) hates two things; germs and people. Living in a completely sterilized apartment, he spends this particular evening abusing employees and other folks over the phone. Everything is under his grasp&#8230; Until an onslaught of never-ending cockroaches invade his home. A strong note to go out on, E.G. Marshall&#8217;s character is the kind of character you love to hate. </p>
<p>All the segments are tied together with additional wraparounds of a boy (King&#8217;s son Joe King) who orders a voodoo doll to get revenge on his dad (Tom Atkins) for throwing out his comics. It&#8217;s just a wacky horror romp that&#8217;s overflowing with comic book style. There was a sequel but the stories were no where near as funny or inventive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=767</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 20</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=766</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=766#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Poltergeist (1982) Dir: Tobe HooperCast: Craig T. Nelson, JoBeth Williams, Beatrice Straight, Domonique Dunne, Oliver Robins, Heater O&#8217;Rourke, Zelda RubinsteinI used to be kind of hard on Poltergeist for reasons I can&#8217;t really remember. I do think it holds back on being as dark as it could of been but whatever, that doesn&#8217;t change the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Poltergeist (1982)</span></td>
<td width="150"><i"http://sites.google.com/damorgue.org/home/" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TL6VFd4X2GI/AAAAAAAABr8/W0DPfpfLPN0/s1600/poltergeist-movie-poster12.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 210px; height: 320px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TL6VFd4X2GI/AAAAAAAABr8/W0DPfpfLPN0/s320/poltergeist-movie-poster12.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5530021313610504290" /></a><br /><b>Dir: Tobe Hooper<br />Cast: Craig T. Nelson, JoBeth Williams, Beatrice Straight, Domonique Dunne, Oliver Robins, Heater O&#8217;Rourke, Zelda Rubinstein</b><br />I used to be kind of hard on <i>Poltergeist</i> for reasons I can&#8217;t really remember. I do think it holds back on being as dark as it could of been but whatever, that doesn&#8217;t change the fact that it&#8217;s made an impact on the genre. How many times have you heard about something that was &#8220;Buried over an Indian burial ground?&#8221; <i>Poltergeist</i> may be more &#8220;Hollywood&#8221; than your average horror flick but that doesn&#8217;t make it any less important. </p>
<p>So the film starts out following a peaceful suburban family in California. The perfect picture of the American family, things take a turn for the worse when Carol Anne (Heather O&#8217;Rourke) the youngest child is contacted by spirits through the family television. Soon enough a series of paranormal disturbances wreak havoc on the family, you know like evil trees and clown dolls. The film escalates as Carol is sucked into the television and into the spirit world. So they hire  a medium played pitch perfect by the unusual Zelda Rubinstein. From there on the Freeling family battles it out with the spirits and there&#8217;s no shortage of corpses that launch out of the ground. Some great creepy visuals and an excellent soundtrack from Jerry Goldsmith as well. </p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TL6VLYWqT_I/AAAAAAAABsE/Uy3HD_4T238/s1600/poltergeist.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 235px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TL6VLYWqT_I/AAAAAAAABsE/Uy3HD_4T238/s320/poltergeist.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5530021415206146034" /></a></p>
<p>People say there&#8217;s a curse on the film as the two daughters in the film both died young and two other actors from the sequels are also dead. Though that&#8217;s very sad that&#8217;s hardly a curse, &#8220;The Little Rascals&#8221;, now there&#8217;s some messed up shit. I&#8217;ve always been more interested in the debate over who really directed the film. Though Tobe Hooper (<i>The Texas Chainsaw Massacre</i>) is the credited director, many crew members have claimed that producer Steven Spielberg helmed most of the important stuff. Sounds to me like they both did their fair share of work on it but Spielberg just by nature is the more interactive filmmaker, so really it should&#8217;ve of been credited to both of them but what the hell do I know? <i>Poltergeist</i> does have that Spielberg shimmer on it though and miraculously holds up well today, check it out but don&#8217;t look into the light.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=766</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>101</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 19</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=765</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=765#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 07:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Zombi 2 (1979) Dir: Lucio Fulci Cast: Tisa Farrow, Ian McCullough, Richard Johnson&#8220;Zombi 2? Were doing a sequel now? What about Zombi 1? Is there a Zombi 1?&#8221; It&#8217;s sort of complicated but I&#8217;ll try and explain. Zombi 2, also known as; Zombie, Island of the Living Dead, Zombie Island, Zombie Flesh Eaters and Woodoo [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Zombi 2 (1979)</span></td>
<td width="150"><i"http://sites.google.com/damorgue.org/home/" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TL1JwULAYvI/AAAAAAAABr0/facWP5zGPb4/s1600/zombi+2+2.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 215px; height: 320px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TL1JwULAYvI/AAAAAAAABr0/facWP5zGPb4/s320/zombi+2+2.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5529657011878257394" /></a><br /><b>Dir: Lucio Fulci <br />Cast: Tisa Farrow, Ian McCullough, Richard Johnson</b><br />&#8220;Zombi 2? Were doing a sequel now? What about Zombi 1? Is there a Zombi 1?&#8221; It&#8217;s sort of complicated but I&#8217;ll try and explain. <i>Zombi 2</i>, also known as; <i>Zombie</i>, <i>Island of the Living Dead</i>, <i>Zombie Island</i>, <i>Zombie Flesh Eaters</i> and <i>Woodoo</i> is an Italian film from the &#8220;Godfather of Gore&#8221; Lucio Fulci. To my understanding it&#8217;s a foreign sequel to the American <i>Dawn of the Dead</i> which in Italy is called &#8220;Zombi&#8221;. </p>
<p>With all that out of the way let met regale you with the touching story of a zombie that fought a shark. Yes that&#8217;s an actual scene from the movie and yes, it&#8217;s awesome. What really makes it and many other scenes a blast is that despite this film&#8217;s low budget, the violence looks real. I mean that&#8217;s why they called Lucio Fulci &#8220;The Godfather of Gore&#8221; not only were his films bloody but the violence looked real. That&#8217;s quite an accomplishment when you&#8217;re working with nothing and although this film is a bit of a muddled mess, it&#8217;s grisly fun. </p>
<p>Mia Farrow&#8217;s sister Tisa Farrow stars as Anne, a young woman interrogated by the police after her missing father&#8217;s yacht (with a zombie passenger) drifts into the New York Harbor. Along with a reporter named Peter (Ian McCulloch), Anne discovers a note from her father saying he&#8217;s on the island of Matool suffering from an unknown disease. So they go and what do they find? An island of bloodthirsty zombies. They meet up with a doctor (Richard Johnson) studying the epidemic but it doesn&#8217;t take long for the situation to get a little out of hand.</p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TL1Jmg2hk4I/AAAAAAAABrs/rpVhZGl-oHc/s1600/zombi2-2.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 180px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TL1Jmg2hk4I/AAAAAAAABrs/rpVhZGl-oHc/s320/zombi2-2.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5529656843483321218" /></a></p>
<p>Unfortunately the English release has some horrid dubbing and at times the film can become so grainy it looks about as good as a rotted corpse. It&#8217;s a great idea but it tends to ramble and feel disjointed. But this if anything, is a great effects movie. Probably one of the most memorable scenes (aside from the Tiger Shark thing) is a where we watch a human eyeball slowly pushed into a shard of wood. It&#8217;s slow, it&#8217;s disturbing, and it&#8217;s morbidly satisfying. This isn&#8217;t a film for the squeamish but what squeamish person would rent a movie called &#8220;Zombi 2&#8243; anyway? It&#8217;s no where near the same quality of the Romero pictures but it just goes to show that there are a few other good zombie flicks wandering around out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=765</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Wonderful Land of Adz</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=764</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=764#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 05:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sufjan Stevens &#8211; The Age of Adz Straight up, the only Sufjan Stevens album I ever listened to was Illinoise and in recent years even that has been reduced pretty much to just the track &#8220;Chicago.&#8221; For his part, he hasn&#8217;t really done a proper followup to that 2005 album, instead releasing lengthy EPs, bizarre [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Sufjan Stevens &#8211; <i>The Age of Adz</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TLwonavvHCI/AAAAAAAAA6o/JNq1xxn7uCI/s1600/Sufjanstevensageofadz.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TLwonavvHCI/AAAAAAAAA6o/JNq1xxn7uCI/s200/Sufjanstevensageofadz.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<p>Straight up, the only Sufjan Stevens album I ever listened to was <i>Illinoise</i> and in recent years even that has been reduced pretty much to just the track &#8220;Chicago.&#8221; For his part, he hasn&#8217;t really done a proper followup to that 2005 album, instead releasing lengthy EPs, bizarre experiments and collaborating with other artists (such as an appearance on the latest from The National). But now he&#8217;s put out <i>The Age of Adz </i>and called it the legitimate followup to <i>Illinoise</i>. It&#8217;s not named after a state, but does that mean Stevens can never achieve greatness again?</p>
<p>Normally it makes sense to talk about an album from the beginning, but I&#8217;d like to start discussing <i>The Age of Adz </i>with the last song. Called &#8220;Impossible Soul,&#8221; the track is 25 minutes long. Normally when you see something like that, it&#8217;s because there&#8217;s a bunch of silence then a hidden track tacked on. But Stevens has actually put together a little symphony to compliment the rest of his album. With a number of distinct movements, the song features everything from horns to auto-tuned vocals. In the age of playlists and a la carte music purchases, it&#8217;s incredibly brave to put something together like &#8220;Impossible Soul,&#8221; and that is probably the most remarkable feature of this package.</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s not just the last song that makes this album great. The whole album seems huge. I don&#8217;t know if any of these songs are going to be the next &#8220;Chicago,&#8221; but I have no doubt anyone could listen to <i>The Age of Adz </i>and find something they love. The way Stevens combines classical and electronic instrumentation is fun to listen to and he often lends emotional credibility to his songs. This has to be heard to be believed.</p>
<p>Like I said, I haven&#8217;t been following Sufjan Stevens for the last half decade, I don&#8217;t really know what the work he&#8217;s been putting out is like. What I do know is that this new album is kind of amazing, and will probably stay in my album rotation for a while. For an album that&#8217;s an hour and 15 minutes long, that&#8217;s pretty serious.</p>
<p><b>Favorite Tracks: </b>&#8220;Too Much,&#8221; &#8220;All for Myself,&#8221; &#8220;Impossible Soul&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=764</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 18</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=763</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=763#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Hills Have Eyes (1977) Dir: Wes CravenCast: Susan Lanier, Robert Houston, Martin Spear, Dee Wallace, James Whitworth, Michael BerrymanIn the early 1400s the Beane Family, a feral clan roamed the highlands of Scotland. They murdered and ate transients until eventually caught and executed on the order of King James without a trial. This would [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">The Hills Have Eyes (1977)</span></td>
<td width="150"><i"http://sites.google.com/damorgue.org/home/" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TLvxGcwmRkI/AAAAAAAABrk/zXLQtoC54kE/s1600/Hillshaveeyesposter.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 210px; height: 320px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TLvxGcwmRkI/AAAAAAAABrk/zXLQtoC54kE/s320/Hillshaveeyesposter.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5529278060628952642" /></a><br /><b>Dir: Wes Craven<br />Cast: Susan Lanier, Robert Houston, Martin Spear, Dee Wallace, James Whitworth, Michael Berryman</b><br />In the early 1400s the Beane Family, a feral clan roamed the highlands of Scotland. They murdered and ate transients until eventually caught and executed on the order of King James without a trial. This would serve as the inspiration for the grim cult classic <i>The Hill Have Eyes</i>. The controversial followup film to Craven&#8217;s controversial <i>The Last House on the Left</i>. Not a sequel just his second film, though they do have their similarities. Both pit  group of innocents against violent, unsympathetic, people&#8230; If you can call them people.</p>
<p>This violent gang of cannibals is lead by the monstrous Papa Jupiter (Bill Drago), Mama (Cordy Clark) and includes their four children; Mars (Lance Gordon), Mercury (Pete Locke), Ruby (Janus Blythe) and Pluto (Michael Berryman, the creep guy on the poster.) Together they stalk a family passing through the desert in an RV and make their lives a living hell.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s not much to it really, just a bunch of violent confrontations that always leave you uneasy. If there&#8217;s anything that really stands out it&#8217;s Michael Berryman, the film&#8217;s breakout character. He gives a menacing performance that&#8217;s only enhanced by Berryman&#8217;s unusual appearance. You see Berryman was born with Hypohidrotic Ectodermal Dysplasia, a condition which prevents one from developing hair, fingernails, or sweat glands (not really ideal for a movie filmed in the desert.) He was also supposedly born with 26 birth defects and yet he&#8217;s made a great career for himself. I&#8217;ll always remember him for his appearance on the <i>X-Files</i> and he continues to pop up from time to time. Word has he&#8217;s a really intelligent and nice guy, surprising when you watch his monstrous performance in this.</p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TLvw1Cm47II/AAAAAAAABrc/tClC4jyXHnA/s1600/hilllu1.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 180px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TLvw1Cm47II/AAAAAAAABrc/tClC4jyXHnA/s320/hilllu1.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5529277761551133826" /></a></p>
<p>Well I got a little off topic but I write what I feel. So that knocks out another Craven film and another one which has been remade. What Craven film will be remade next <i>Swamp Thing</i>? I rarely say this but that actually could benefit from a  remake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=763</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 17</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=762</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=762#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 09:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Suspiria (1977) Director: Dario Argento Cast: Jessica Harper, Udo Kier, Joan Bennett, Alida ValliSuspiria: Beautiful, atmospheric, awful… &#8220;Wait Suspiria? Perhaps the most notable Italian horror movie ever made and you&#8217;re telling me it&#8217;s bad? Whatchu talkin&#8217; bout Willis?&#8221; That would probably be the reaction from most horror movie purists. Suspiria has draw dropping cinematography, an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Suspiria (1977)</span></td>
<td width="150"><i"http://sites.google.com/damorgue.org/home/" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TLrDPFMiLdI/AAAAAAAABrU/lz4yCAjoMHE/s1600/suspiria_movie_poster.png"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 238px; height: 320px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TLrDPFMiLdI/AAAAAAAABrU/lz4yCAjoMHE/s320/suspiria_movie_poster.png" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5528946156410908114" /></a><br /><b>Director: Dario Argento <br />Cast: Jessica Harper, Udo Kier, Joan Bennett, Alida Valli</b><br /><i>Suspiria</i>: Beautiful, atmospheric, awful… &#8220;Wait <i>Suspiria</i>? Perhaps the most notable Italian horror movie ever made and you&#8217;re telling me it&#8217;s bad? Whatchu talkin&#8217; bout Willis?&#8221; That would probably be the reaction from most horror movie purists. <i>Suspiria</i>  has draw dropping cinematography, an intensely chilling score, but have you ever actually tried to follow this thing? It makes absolutely no sense, it&#8217;s a terrible story and yet it&#8217;s still an influential work. Considered the crowning achievement of Horror Legend Dario Argento, let me tell you why this film despite it&#8217;s incoherent plot is a cult classic.</p>
<p>In the most basic explanation <i>Suspiria</i> is about a young American ballet dancer named Susy Banyon who&#8217;s come to Germany to study dance at a renowned academy. Though as soon as she arrives students are murdered and something seems a bit off about the faculty. Sounds like an accessible slasher setup but this film is always taking a back seat to it&#8217;s visuals, so much that the plot suffers. So the big surprise is the faculty is like a coven of witches but their motivations are never clear. The story is littered with plot holes and unexplained occurrences, almost as if it was written around certain violent set pieces rather than an actual narrative. So why should anyone care about <i>Suspiria</i>? Because this film looks like no other. </p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TLrDIMBG7KI/AAAAAAAABrM/b4X19m0pUVc/s1600/65c71905cb9310c783bf8f78cf6eb723.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 214px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TLrDIMBG7KI/AAAAAAAABrM/b4X19m0pUVc/s320/65c71905cb9310c783bf8f78cf6eb723.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5528946037982948514" /></a></p>
<p>One of the last films to use the Technicolor Three-Strip process <i>Suspiria</i> vividly captures a vast color spectrum and combined with creative camerawork creates a breathtaking nightmare. I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if some of these visuals inspired many horror filmmakers and that&#8217;s what has kept it&#8217;s legacy alive. Though you can&#8217;t overlook the satanic synth soundtrack from prog rock group <i>Goblin</i>. Most famous for their score to <i>Dawn of the Dead</i>, this is another one of their best works (needed to throw that in somewhere.)</p>
<p>So is it a good movie? In my opinion no, but it is an important one that is worth recognizing, just don&#8217;t try to make any sense of it. Word on the street is that filmmaker David Gordon Green has been aching to do a remake for awhile now, I wonder if he could make it coherent?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=762</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Orange October Continues</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=761</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=761#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2010 18:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well it&#8217;s mid-October and the San Francisco Giants are still playing baseball. Honestly, I&#8217;m still having a hard team believing this, considering this was a team that I witnessed get swept by the Oakland A&#8217;s back in May, and were made to look absolutely foolish by the Padres for most of the season. But none [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TLoADNyDYmI/AAAAAAAAA6U/-hKC8aL00aw/s1600/Giants.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 220px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TLoADNyDYmI/AAAAAAAAA6U/-hKC8aL00aw/s320/Giants.jpg" border="0" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5528731547789910626" /></a><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TLn_Wm-GXqI/AAAAAAAAA6M/7-qXwcENjec/s1600/Giants.jpg"></a><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_Wis8wBpmbbk/TLn-5nGvZlI/AAAAAAAAA6E/DXiCxuPBpQ4/s1600/Giants.jpg" style="text-decoration: none;"></a>Well it&#8217;s mid-October and the San Francisco Giants are still playing baseball.  Honestly, I&#8217;m still having a hard team believing this, considering this was a team that I witnessed get swept by the Oakland A&#8217;s back in May, and were made to look absolutely foolish by the Padres for most of the season.  But none of that matters now as Brian Sabean somehow managed to turn this rag-tag bunch of unwanted veterans and emerging youngsters into pennant contenders.
<div></div>
<div>So now the big question is, how in the hell do the Giants beat the Phillies?  For most people it doesn&#8217;t seem possible, but there&#8217;s plenty of reason to keep up hope.  First of all, let&#8217;s look at how that supposedly impenetrable Phillies rotation did this year against the Giants.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Roy Halladay &#8211; 0-1, 6.43 ERA</div>
<div>Cole Hamels &#8211; 0-1, 7.36 ERA</div>
<div>Roy Oswalt &#8211; 1-3, 3.33 ERA</div>
<div></div>
<div>So really, there&#8217;s plenty of reason to doubt that Phillies pitching will absolutely dominate this Giants line-up like everyone expects them to.  Of course in the last month or two, these three pitchers have been just about perfect, but then again, so have Lincecum, Cain, and Sanchez.  So basically we can all expect to see one of the best pitched post-season series in history.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Now looking at the Phillies line-up, that&#8217;s were things get a little distressing.  Yes, you&#8217;ve got you&#8217;re Utley&#8217;s and your Howard&#8217;s and to a lesser extent your Victorino&#8217;s.  The Giant&#8217;s lineup on the other hand has Buster Posey, a glorious man-child sent down from the heavens with the sole purpose of rectifying this otherwise mediocre offense.  Plus you&#8217;ve got those crafty veterans like Aubrey Huff, Pat Burrell, and Juan Uribe who we can only hope will come up with those big hits when we need them most.  </div>
<div></div>
<div>I&#8217;m also hanging on to the idea that Matt seems to remind us of with each coming postseason, and that&#8217;s the fact that this is only seven games, and anything can happen in seven games.  So are the Giants as good a team as the Phillies? I&#8217;m gonna have to say no, not really.  But that&#8217;s what&#8217;s made this team so much fun to root for all season long, they&#8217;re the lovable underdogs, and who am I to say that they can&#8217;t pull off one more miracle? So all I really have left to say is GO GIANTS!</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=761</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 16</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=760</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=760#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2010 07:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jaws (1975) Dir: Steven SpielbergCast: Roy Scheider, Richard Dreyfuss, Robert ShawDun nun, duh nuh, duh nuh… Gives me chills just thinking about it. I&#8217;ve never been sure whether or not you could really classify Jaws as a &#8220;Horror&#8221; movie. I&#8217;ve always thought of it as an action/adventure more like Jurassic Park, but I figure it&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Jaws (1975)</span></td>
<td width="150"><i"http://sites.google.com/damorgue.org/home/" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TLlbdfKYPOI/AAAAAAAABrE/sAtbNaZ0WmI/s1600/JAWS_Movie_poster.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 222px; height: 320px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TLlbdfKYPOI/AAAAAAAABrE/sAtbNaZ0WmI/s320/JAWS_Movie_poster.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5528550579713359074" /></a><br /><b>Dir: Steven Spielberg<br />Cast: Roy Scheider, Richard Dreyfuss, Robert Shaw</b><br />Dun nun, duh nuh, duh nuh… Gives me chills just thinking about it. I&#8217;ve never been sure whether or not you could really classify <i>Jaws</i> as a &#8220;Horror&#8221; movie. I&#8217;ve always thought of it as an action/adventure more like <i>Jurassic Park</i>, but I figure it&#8217;s scared enough people to earn a spot on this list, I mean it&#8217;s one of my favorite movies PERIOD. </p>
<p>The movie that made everyone afraid to go in the water is just as exciting as ever. I could weigh this down with a plot synopsis but who hasn&#8217;t seen this? What&#8217;s to explain really? &#8220;A Shark kills people, so some people got to kill the shark.&#8221; That&#8217;s basically it in it&#8217;s crudest form, but it&#8217;s so simple that there&#8217;s so much to build upon. The characters are all excellently crafted, compelling and humorous in their own ways. Richard Dreyfuss fills the kind of obnoxious scientist role, Robert Shaw is the rough-around-the-edges, monologue spewing mariner and Roy Scheider is the relatable, level headed, police chief, they&#8217;re all brilliant. </p>
<p>Dialogue comes to mind as another standout element. Little snippets like &#8220;That&#8217;s a real bad hat harry&#8221; or the infamous &#8220;Were gonna need a bigger boat.&#8221; Or how about the legendary USS Indianapolis story? Tell me you don&#8217;t get chills when Quint tells that chilling yarn. Peter Benchley (Also the author of the book) and Carl Gottlieb (Who would co-write <i>The Jerk</i>) penned one of my all time favorite scripts without a wasted breath. </p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TLlbWI2EHEI/AAAAAAAABq8/ENhNhM6N8R0/s1600/Jaws-jaws-468735_686_353.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 165px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TLlbWI2EHEI/AAAAAAAABq8/ENhNhM6N8R0/s320/Jaws-jaws-468735_686_353.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5528550453463489602" /></a></p>
<p>Let&#8217;s see… Oh yes, how could I talk about <i>Jaws</i> without mentioning the music? Got to be up there with John Williams top three scores along with <i>Star Wars</i> and <i>Indiana Jones</i> hmm, though there&#8217;s also <i>Superman</i>? Damn he&#8217;s prolific! Sometimes I wonder what this movie would of been like without that theme. In a way the music basically is the shark as we seldom see it. I think most are aware that this movie was hell putting together, with basically everything going wrong that could go wrong.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not positive but this has to be the biggest blockbuster out of all my Shocktober selections, after all it was the first blockbuster. <i>Jaws</i> is one of those rare films that changed the shape of cinema… You could even say it turned the tides? In that it changed how so many studios produced and marketed action/thrillers. This is one of those movies I could talk about forever, so I&#8217;m gonna stop now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=760</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>105</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conversations with Myself</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=759</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=759#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 22:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nelson Mandela The darkest moments in humanities history often reveals the brightest of stars.&#160; The 20st century was full of these stars, whether war heroes like Dwight Eisenhower, equality activists like Martin Luther King Jr., or Neil Armstrong who showcased that we can put a man on the moon, these guys are what make America [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: xx-large;"><i>Nelson Mandela</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/3.5.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>
<div class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_-8WxeU1zX_g/TLjHv8zKwNI/AAAAAAAAAMQ/4BdWNrWuzew/s1600/conversations+with+myself.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_-8WxeU1zX_g/TLjHv8zKwNI/AAAAAAAAAMQ/4BdWNrWuzew/s320/conversations+with+myself.jpg" width="236" /></a>The darkest moments in humanities history often reveals the brightest of stars.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>The 20st century was full of these stars, whether war heroes like Dwight Eisenhower, equality activists like Martin Luther King Jr., or Neil Armstrong who showcased that we can put a man on the moon, these guys are what make America such a wonderful place to live in.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>But America is not the only breeding ground for humanities finest, during one of the darkest times of Africa&#8217;s history, Nelson Mandela, rose above and fought for a better, freer South Africa.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal"></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">I first heard of Mandela when I was playing apples to apples in seventh grade.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>Not to the surprise of people that no me, I had no idea who he was, and did not pursue knowledge of him either.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>In tenth grade, my world history class spent about a week on the apartheid that occurred in South Africa, it was then that Mandela came up again; this time, the name was going to stay in my mind.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal"></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">Mandela&#8217;s story is a remarkable one.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>He started as a member of a royal family in a small South African town, but then got involved with politics. &nbsp;Mandela focused on&nbsp;working toward the liberation of South Africa. &nbsp;The roots of this conflict lead back to the dutch coming to South Africa in 1650&#8242;s. &nbsp;After a couple hundred years, dutch farmers, born in South Africa became known as Boers or Afrikaners. &nbsp;They fought with the British in the 19th century who came to occupy South Africa (because of its strategic trade position at the Cape of Good Hope, South Africa was highly&nbsp;desirable&nbsp;land). &nbsp;The Zulu&#8217;s or native South African people drew the shortest stick, and were further pushed back and enslaved by the Dutch and&nbsp;British. &nbsp;In the early 20th century the British and Afrikaner parties worked together&nbsp;divvying&nbsp;up&nbsp;territory&nbsp;and joint ruling, leaving the majority Zulu population behind. &nbsp;The first major articles of segregation&nbsp;legislation&nbsp;started to pass, and the apartheid era was beginning. &nbsp;It was up to Mandela to stop it. &nbsp;</div>
<div class="MsoNormal"></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">In 1948, the Afrikaner-majority&nbsp;political&nbsp;group, that supported the apartheid and segregation, was elected to office. &nbsp;By now, South Africa was heavily&nbsp;segregated. &nbsp;Mandela, a member of the African National Congress, ANC, used his political office to protest against the&nbsp;segregative&nbsp;government. &nbsp;For his activities, Mandela was incarcerated and sent to prison in 1964. &nbsp;During this time, the government thought sending Mandela to jail would stop his growing public support, in fact, the opposite happened; Mandela used his time in prison to write detailed letters to the people, building more and more support. &nbsp;When Mandela walked free in 1990, he had huge support in the multi-racial movement. &nbsp;The following four years, Mandela struggled to fully unite the people, but in 1994, in the first free, multi-racial election, the ANC was elected as the political group, and Mandela President of South Africa. &nbsp;Mandela used his time in office to end the apartheid&nbsp;completely&nbsp;and unite South Africa.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal"></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">That is, in brief, who Nelson Mandela is. &nbsp;I came&nbsp;across&nbsp;a news article of this new book about Mandela that included various writings from throughout his life, working more on his personal side. &nbsp;<i>A Long Walk to Freedom, </i>Mandela&#8217;s autobiography, was published a few years ago, but I never picked up a copy and read it. &nbsp;I thought that I should give this new one, <i>Conversations with Myself</i>&nbsp;a read.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal"></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">I expected that this book would be written by Mandela, sort of like a second autobiography. &nbsp;Within reason, the book is an autobiography, and written by Mandela, but really it isn&#8217;t. &nbsp;A team of writers gathered hundreds of Mandela&#8217;s diary entries from all over the years, organized them by four themes, not&nbsp;chronologically, which I think makes the book more difficult to understand, and then published it. &nbsp;The actual entries are wonderful, Mandela is a gifted writer with a strong sense of&nbsp;voice&nbsp;and attitude in each writing. &nbsp;The problem though, half of the entries I have no idea what Mandela is talking about or what is going on at that time. &nbsp;The compilers could have added some more commentary between the entries to explain, but didn&#8217;t. &nbsp;One other thing worth mentioning, President Obama &#8216;wrote&#8217; the foreward for the book. &nbsp;Of all the people out there, I don&#8217;t think Obama was the right choice. &nbsp;I respect it, but don&#8217;t like it. &nbsp;Just doesn&#8217;t feel right for this because the U.S. never really supported Mandela until very recently. &nbsp;It was actually our CIA that helped the Afrikaners arrest Mandela in 62&#8242;. &nbsp;Since the book requires a heavy understanding of Mandela&#8217;s life, and jumps around quite a bit, this book couldn&#8217;t get the perfect rating. &nbsp;If your familiar with the&nbsp;apartheid&nbsp;in South Africa, this book is probably perfect for you, if you, like me, just have general knowledge on the subject, I would spend the time and money on Mandela&#8217;s actual autobiography.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=759</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 15</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=758</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=758#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 07:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Black Christmas (1974) Dir: Bob Clark Cast: Olivia Hussey, Keir Dullea, Margot Kidder, John Saxon, Marian Waldman, Andrea MartinWhat better time for mayhem than during the jolliest time of the year? It&#8217;s no surprise that the emerging slasher genre would work it&#8217;s way through all the holidays, but wait a second… This film predates John [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Black Christmas (1974)</span></td>
<td width="150"><i"http://sites.google.com/damorgue.org/home/" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TLgEOEW4rPI/AAAAAAAABq0/k-mknjHUtfI/s1600/Black_christmas_movie_poster.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 221px; height: 320px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TLgEOEW4rPI/AAAAAAAABq0/k-mknjHUtfI/s320/Black_christmas_movie_poster.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5528173182331694322" /></a><br /><b>Dir: Bob Clark <br />Cast: Olivia Hussey, Keir Dullea, Margot Kidder, John Saxon, Marian Waldman, Andrea Martin</b><br />What better time for mayhem than during the jolliest time of the year? It&#8217;s no surprise that the emerging slasher genre would work it&#8217;s way through all the holidays, but wait a second… This film predates John Carpenter&#8217;s <i>Halloween</i>? &#8220;Are you telling me there was a holiday themed slasher flick made a whole four years before <i>Halloween</i>?&#8221; I guess in that respect <i>Black Christmas</i> was ahead of the curve, from the concept to even the techniques used in the film.</p>
<p>&#8220;A homicidal maniac attacks a sorority house during the Christmas Season.&#8221; Could you come up with a more basic premise for a slasher flick? Do we know why he does it? No, do we know who he is or do we find out? Nope, you don&#8217;t even see him and it&#8217;s this vague approach that makes it work so well. All of the killer&#8217;s scenes are from his P.O.V, so we don&#8217;t even know what he looks like and you gotta admire that kind of boldness in filmmaking. This movie strives to keep you in the dark, decreasing your comfort level with every scene and every kill. As we&#8217;ve all heard, &#8220;Sometimes the scariest thing is what you don&#8217;t see.&#8221;</p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TLgEE_OotpI/AAAAAAAABqs/v-CAhv-41QE/s1600/black.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 181px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TLgEE_OotpI/AAAAAAAABqs/v-CAhv-41QE/s320/black.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5528173026336093842" /></a></p>
<p><i>Black Christmas</i> doesn&#8217;t often get the recognition I think it deserves but it&#8217;s built up a strong cult following. The film even featured some future actors before they were famous including; Nick Mancuso, Margot Kidder and Andrea Martin. Though probably weirdest of all is the director Bob Clark went on to do <i>A Christmas Story</i> . Wow, the most beloved Christmas film and the darkest with the same man behind the camera, makes you think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=758</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 14</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=757</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=757#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s Alive (1974) Dir: Larry CohenCast: John P. Ryan, Sharon Farrell, William Wellman Jr, James Dixon, Daniel HozmanIt&#8217;s Alive is a movie about a mother who gives birth to a mutant baby that goes on a killing spree. I shit you not, that&#8217;s actually what this movie is about. Sounds terrible right? I mean what [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">It&#8217;s Alive (1974)</span></td>
<td width="150"><i"http://sites.google.com/damorgue.org/home/" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TLaq047-vLI/AAAAAAAABqk/zzLqH097Okc/s1600/Itsaliveposter.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 210px; height: 320px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TLaq047-vLI/AAAAAAAABqk/zzLqH097Okc/s320/Itsaliveposter.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5527793418257743026" /></a><br /><b>Dir: Larry Cohen<br />Cast: John P. Ryan, Sharon Farrell, William Wellman Jr, James Dixon, Daniel Hozman</b><br /><i>It&#8217;s Alive</i> is a movie about a mother who gives birth to a mutant baby that goes on a killing spree. I shit you not, that&#8217;s actually what this movie is about. Sounds terrible right? I mean what an awful premise, must be really cheesy huh? Actually, it&#8217;s not that bad. I&#8217;m not saying that it&#8217;s milestone or even an underrated classic but it&#8217;s interesting, interesting that someone could make this movie and not make it bad. Writer/Director Larry Cohen is a cult favorite in Horror circles and he often tackled silly ideas with a smart approach. So I felt his contributions were worth addressing in this week&#8217;s review of <i>It&#8217;s Alive</i>. </p>
<p>Frank (John Ryan) and Lenore (Sharen Farrell) and their first son Charley (Daniel Hozman) are the definitive portrait of a happy family and are readily awaiting kid #2. The couple avoid having another child for years, but when they finally decide they can afford another child, Lenore begans taking &#8220;Experimental Fertility Drugs!&#8217; Gotta watch out for those. So what happens when she goes to the delivery room? Baby jumps out and kills everybody. From then on it becomes a  heated pursuit of finding the murdering tot. </p>
<p>We only get little glimpses of the baby here and there, but actually it looks pretty good. Rick Baker (<i>Star Wars</i>, <i>An American Werewolf in London</i>) designed the creature and it does it&#8217;s job to terrify. Not to mention the soundtrack was composed by Berrnard Herrmann, how they sold him on a movie like this i have no idea, but he was probably just getting paid. Though what really standouts to me is John P. Ryan&#8217;s performance as the grieving father, he puts a lot into this performance. There&#8217;s one scene near the ending where he actually finds the baby, scared and helpless and he makes the scene absolutely heartbreaking, who would&#8217;ve thunk it?</p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TLaqoKNoLxI/AAAAAAAABqc/BuK8u_k0JnI/s1600/itsalive3.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 186px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TLaqoKNoLxI/AAAAAAAABqc/BuK8u_k0JnI/s320/itsalive3.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5527793199556865810" /></a></p>
<p><i>It&#8217;s Alive</i> is NOT a great movie but it&#8217;s left such a strange mark I had to mention it. I also had to warn everyone cause at the end a detective reports that there&#8217;s been another monster baby born in Seattle. So everyone be on the lookout for a 36 year old homicidal mutant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=757</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 13</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=756</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=756#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 17:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=756</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#8217;t Look Now (1973) Dir: Nicolas RoegCast: Julie Christie, Donald SutherlandBefore he was a director Nicolas Roeg was a talented Cinematographer. His work included The Masque of the Red Death, Fahrenheit 451, portions of Doctor Zhivago and even some contributions to the visual look of Lawrence of Arabia as a second unit photographer. Then in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Don&#8217;t Look Now (1973)</span></td>
<td width="150"><i"http://sites.google.com/damorgue.org/home/" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TLXxK164ddI/AAAAAAAABqU/aGyPkB5yjks/s1600/Dont-Look-Now.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 214px; height: 320px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TLXxK164ddI/AAAAAAAABqU/aGyPkB5yjks/s320/Dont-Look-Now.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5527589286242186706" /></a><br /><b>Dir: Nicolas Roeg<br />Cast: Julie Christie, Donald Sutherland</b><br />Before he was a director Nicolas Roeg was a talented Cinematographer. His work included <i>The Masque of the Red Death</i>, <i>Fahrenheit 451</i>, portions of <i>Doctor Zhivago</i> and even some contributions to the visual look of <i>Lawrence of Arabia</i> as a second unit photographer. Then in the early 70s he became a director but you could still feel that same visual flare in his films and <i>Don&#8217;t Look Now</i>  is a prime example. </p>
<p>Laura (Julie Christie) and John Baxter (Donald Sutherland) are a married couple who have recently lost their daughter. With their marriage on the rocks, the two decide to take a &#8220;working vacation&#8221; to Venice. Here John has been contracted to restore an old church while Laura befriends a pair of eccentric twin sisters who claim to have psychic powers! Laura becomes drawn in when one sister claims to have made contact without the couple&#8217;s daughter. </p>
<p>Meanwhile a series of grisly murders are taking place across the city. Why attention is drawn to this subplot is unclear, until the end and it&#8217;s a doozy. So John begins to catch glimpses of a childlike figure who resembles his daughter wandering the city, he follows it but is unsuccessful in ever catching it. From there on the film only descends into further madness as the character&#8217;s start to question their sanity, it&#8217;s a real trip to say the least.</p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TLXw_sfy6rI/AAAAAAAABqM/LulR8TrU_xo/s1600/728_dontlook.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 173px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TLXw_sfy6rI/AAAAAAAABqM/LulR8TrU_xo/s320/728_dontlook.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5527589094734097074" /></a></p>
<p>Now <i>Don&#8217;t Look Now</i> isn&#8217;t the most exciting thriller. It can try your patience with some achingly slow moments but there&#8217;s other aspects to enjoy. Like I said it&#8217;s a beautifully photographed film, very picturesque locations and overall pleasing cinematography. Christie and Sutherland  have an intense chemistry that&#8217;s almost unsettling, they share a surprisingly graphic love scene together. </p>
<p>Though there&#8217;s one big reason i still remember this movie and look back to it and that&#8217;s the end. It&#8217;s a twisty and disturbing finale of the finest caliber and it always freaks me out. Hell, I can&#8217;t go on without spilling the beans so here I go. (<b>Spoiler Ahead!</b>) So remember that child-like figure Donald Sutherland is chasing? Well it turns out it&#8217;s actually this creepy midget woman who just happens to be the murderer everyone&#8217;s looking for. So she stabs Sutherland with the only words he can say being &#8220;Wait… Wait…&#8221; Gives me chills just thinking about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=756</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>94</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 12</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=755</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=755#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 07:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Last House on the Left (1972) Dir: Wes Craven Cast: Sandra Peabody, Lucy Grantham, David Hess, Fred J. Lincoln Jeramie Rain&#8220;The seventies already? What about the last 12 years?&#8221; Well let me explain. The sixties are tricky because most of the notable 60s horror flicks came out at the beginning of the decade, with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">The Last House on the Left (1972)</span></td>
<td width="150"><i"http://sites.google.com/damorgue.org/home/" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TLQSlye0XDI/AAAAAAAABqE/w7-W5DhLj3k/s1600/Last.House.on.the.Left.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 209px; height: 320px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TLQSlye0XDI/AAAAAAAABqE/w7-W5DhLj3k/s320/Last.House.on.the.Left.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5527063083105934386" /></a><br /><b>Dir: Wes Craven <br />Cast: Sandra Peabody, Lucy Grantham, David Hess, Fred J. Lincoln Jeramie Rain</b><br />&#8220;The seventies already? What about the last 12 years?&#8221; Well let me explain. The sixties are tricky because most of the notable 60s horror flicks came out at the beginning of the decade, with the exceptions of films like <i>Rosemary&#8217;s Baby</i> in 1967 and <i>Night of the Living Dead</i> in 1968. The thing is I already reviewed most of the &#8220;big ones&#8221; on my old blog, so I&#8217;m skipping ahead to the seventies where there&#8217;s a whole slew of creepy classics, let us proceed.</p>
<p>So even in his debut film Wes Craven had to deal with a fair share of controversy. Though what did he really expect with a movie about a gang of murdering rapists? Originally intended to be a a graphic &#8220;Hardcore&#8221; film it was changed to more of a thriller/slasher flick, but it&#8217;s still a mighty disturbing film. Basically it&#8217;s about a pair of teenage girls that head to the city to see a rock concert. Looking to score some marijuana they accidentally hookup with a gang that just happens to be a group of psychotic convicts. So the convicts have their way with the girls, take them to the woods, and kill them without hesitation. This leads to the main girl&#8217;s distraught parents seeking vengeance on the murderers and vengeance they get. </p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TLQR8jBadbI/AAAAAAAABps/1j837o3w-70/s1600/lhotl_06.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 176px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TLQR8jBadbI/AAAAAAAABps/1j837o3w-70/s320/lhotl_06.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5527062374581433778" /></a></p>
<p>Apart from it&#8217;s graphic content the film is also notable for it&#8217;s bizarre ever changing tones. Throughout the film were constantly hearing a hippy-like folk soundtrack that was written and partially sung by the film&#8217;s main villain (David Hess). There&#8217;s also a pair of bumbling cops who seem completely out of place, getting into wacky situations with campy clown music. I can&#8217;t think of any other film that&#8217;s so purposely unbalanced but it sure creates an unsettling mood. </p>
<p>My first reaction after seeing it was &#8220;What the hell was that?&#8221; And though I&#8217;m still not crazy about it, I can see why it&#8217;s an influential film in it&#8217;s drive to break barriers. Kind of trailblazer in the horror/docudrama genre along with <i>The Texas Chainsaw Massacre</i>. Wes Craven would of course go on to bigger and better things but this is was an intriguing debut that still has the ability to unnerve and disturb viewers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=755</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 11</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=754</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=754#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 07:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=754</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Black Sunday (1960) Dir: Mario BavaCast: Barbara Steele, John Richardson, Ivo Garrani, Arturo Dominici(Warning: I&#8217;m Phoning it in!)You&#8217;ve probably heard me say about a million times that the 30s was the golden age of horror, but for one little country shaped like a boot it was around the early sixties. The debut film from Italian [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Black Sunday (1960)</span></td>
<td width="150"><i"http://sites.google.com/damorgue.org/home/" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TLK38AYQcsI/AAAAAAAABpk/7MHgL-Sugcs/s1600/Maschera.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 230px; height: 320px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TLK38AYQcsI/AAAAAAAABpk/7MHgL-Sugcs/s320/Maschera.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5526681934258795202" /></a><br /><b>Dir: Mario Bava<br />Cast: Barbara Steele, John Richardson, Ivo Garrani, Arturo Dominici</b><br /><b>(Warning: I&#8217;m Phoning it in!)</b><br />You&#8217;ve probably heard me say about a million times that the 30s was the golden age of horror, but for one little country shaped like a boot it was around the early sixties. The debut film from Italian filmmaker Mario Bava, (at least the first one credited) <i>Black Sunday</i> is a grisly thriller brimming with mystique. A film considered so gruesome and controversial that it was actually banned in the U.K. for eight years! But it&#8217;s not all blood and guts, <i>Black Sunday</i> is literally overflowing with ingenuity and impressive cinematography. </p>
<p>So to my memory it&#8217;s about this witch (Barbara Steele) who rises from the grave and wants to possess this beautiful woman who looks like her or something. Plot-wise I can&#8217;t recall much more except for the violent ending, which I&#8217;ll never forget. Though what I do remember is the great sets and visuals taking you all the way back to 1630. </p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TLK3oIjEBfI/AAAAAAAABpc/YUSDyzjNmjM/s1600/black_sunday1.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 180px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TLK3oIjEBfI/AAAAAAAABpc/YUSDyzjNmjM/s320/black_sunday1.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5526681592854218226" /></a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ll have to keep this one brief as my memory is hazy. I just needed to fill out my 60s timeline and the sixties is kind of slim picking for great horror movies. Though <i>Black Sunday</i> is definitely an important film and worth mentioning, even if it was just a brief acknowledgment. I&#8217;m definitely going to have to read into this supposed &#8220;Golden Age&#8221; for Italian Horror, I mean I didn&#8217;t know there was a &#8220;Golden Age&#8221; until I wrote this review, so there in lies a possible mission this moody season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=754</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>117</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 10</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=753</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=753#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 07:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peeping Tom (1960) Dir: Michael PowellCast: Carl Boehm, Moira Shearer, Anna Massey, Maxine Audley1960 belonged to Psycho and why not? It changed the shape of cinema and broke barriers, but it wasn&#8217;t the only controversial slasher of 1960. U.K. director Michael Powell&#8217;s Peeping Tom like Psycho was a film ahead of it&#8217;s time, but it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Peeping Tom (1960)</span></td>
<td width="150"><i"http://sites.google.com/damorgue.org/home/" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TLFtf5xJzjI/AAAAAAAABpU/EqT1YicFlkU/s1600/5d61f_peeto.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 217px; height: 320px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TLFtf5xJzjI/AAAAAAAABpU/EqT1YicFlkU/s320/5d61f_peeto.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5526318612610666034" /></a><br /><b>Dir: Michael Powell<br />Cast: Carl Boehm, Moira Shearer, Anna Massey, Maxine Audley</b><br />1960 belonged to Psycho and why not? It changed the shape of cinema and broke barriers, but it wasn&#8217;t the only controversial slasher of 1960. U.K. director Michael Powell&#8217;s <i>Peeping Tom</i>  like <i>Psycho</i> was a film ahead of it&#8217;s time, but it unfortunately has never received the same kind of recognition. Both films were considered controversial for their depictions of violence but one heaped praise while the other heaped backlash. <i>Peeping Tom</i> was lambasted for it&#8217;s voyeuristic themes, violence, even the title &#8220;Peeping Tom&#8221; it sound dirty. Though what these early critics failed to see is that there is a strong emotional core under all the violence and this is a great film. </p>
<p>Mark Lewis (Carl Boehm) is a shy, soft spoken, aspiring filmmaker. Working as a part-time adult photographer/landlord Mark seems like your typical loner, but he has a dark secret. Mark likes to murder women and film them while he does so. It&#8217;s so very twisted and yet we as an audience still sympathize with Mark. He&#8217;s a misunderstood man with a view of the world warped by his abusive father. You wouldn&#8217;t think it&#8217;d be the kind of character you could get behind, but he&#8217;s amazingly complex and German actor Carl Boehm is fantastic.</p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TLFtV7u-taI/AAAAAAAABpM/-eSkGXHAghA/s1600/peeping-tom.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 180px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TLFtV7u-taI/AAAAAAAABpM/-eSkGXHAghA/s320/peeping-tom.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5526318441339729314" /></a></p>
<p>Apart from a marvelously executed premise, the film is quite cleverly photographed. For one Mark&#8217;s kills always take place from the POV of his camera and there&#8217;s other details sprinkled around that will catch the corner of your eye. Of course when it comes to mild mannered maniac films from 1960 it&#8217;s still no <i>Psycho</i> but it&#8217;s kind of an intriguing overseas. counterpart. On a side note one of it&#8217;s biggest fans just happens to be Martin Scorsese who is basically responsible for the film getting wider distribution and a re-release in the late 70s, which would help the film find a cult following.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=753</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 9</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=752</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=752#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2010 07:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Fly (1958) Dir: Kurt Neumann Cast: Vincent Price, David Hedison, Patricia Owens (Spoilers)If You like movies about men turning into insect hybrids but don&#8217;t like watching Jeff Goldblum throw up, than this is your film. Adapted from George Langelaan&#8217;s short story, The Fly is that classic tale of a man that tampers with science, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">The Fly (1958)</span></td>
<td width="150"><i"http://sites.google.com/damorgue.org/home/" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TLCiB35ynSI/AAAAAAAABo8/7-N0VpxsU2w/s1600/Theflyposter.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 204px; height: 320px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TLCiB35ynSI/AAAAAAAABo8/7-N0VpxsU2w/s320/Theflyposter.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5526094895853509922" /></a><br /><b>Dir: Kurt Neumann <br />Cast: Vincent Price, David Hedison, Patricia Owens <br />(Spoilers)</b><br />If You like movies about men turning into insect hybrids but don&#8217;t like watching Jeff Goldblum throw up, than this is your film. Adapted from George Langelaan&#8217;s short story, <i>The Fly</i> is that classic tale of a man that tampers with science, then becomes fly, gets horribly killed and so on, but with some unexpected twists and turns along the way. </p>
<p>The film opens when our lead scientist Andre Delambre&#8217;s (David Hedison) remains are found in a hydraulic press. His wife Helene is found guilty of his murder. She is also obsessed with a particular white fly but we&#8217;ll address that later. So she tells her &#8220;story&#8221; that her husband Andre had been working on a transporter device. Desperate to finish the project Andre eventually turned to using himself as the machine&#8217;s test subject but uh oh, what happens when a fly gets in the machine? Abra Cadaver he&#8217;s become a monster and soon this monster side stars to take over his mind. </p>
<p>What&#8217;s great is that it&#8217;s a fairly familiar premise approached in an unconventional way. From the film&#8217;s sequencing to how it&#8217;s paced, it&#8217;s what most monster movies wish they could be &#8220;unpredictable&#8221;. You may already know the fate of the monster but there&#8217;s a lot more to it. <b>(More Spoilers)</b> For the Fly head monster wasn&#8217;t the only thing to come out of the transporter, there is another… And it&#8217;s revealed in one of the most disturbing endings to a horror flick I can recall. </p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TLCiSgou_9I/AAAAAAAABpE/XYD13zu9HWo/s1600/the_fly_1958-779691.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 226px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TLCiSgou_9I/AAAAAAAABpE/XYD13zu9HWo/s320/the_fly_1958-779691.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5526095181665730514" /></a></p>
<p>Remember that white fly? Well it&#8217;s discovered that it is in fact a fly with Andre&#8217;s head and the moment Andre&#8217;s brother Francois (Vincent Price) discovers the abomination you&#8217;ll be shaking in your lab coat. The disturbing shriek of &#8220;Help Me! Help Me!&#8221; as Andre becomes prey in a spider&#8217;s web, that shit is some freaky stuff. If you like the Jeff Goldblum/David Cronenberg version I suggest you check out where it all started, it may not be as slimy but it&#8217;s just as unsettling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=752</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 8</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=751</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=751#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1956) Dir: Don Siegel Cast: Kevin McCarthy, Dana Wyner, King Donovan, Carolyn JonesIt&#8217;s here already! It&#8217;s next! It&#8217;s next! Yes it&#8217;s my review of the 50s, Sci-Fi/Horror classic, Invasion of the Body Snatchers. Culturally significant not only for it&#8217;s shock value but for it&#8217;s complex themes of alienation in modern [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1956)</span></td>
<td width="150"><i"http://sites.google.com/damorgue.org/home/" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TK7EpUS3NPI/AAAAAAAABos/8lWD0ACDpv4/s1600/invasion-of-the-body-snatchers-movie-poster1.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 200px; height: 320px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TK7EpUS3NPI/AAAAAAAABos/8lWD0ACDpv4/s320/invasion-of-the-body-snatchers-movie-poster1.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5525570006931682546" /></a><br /><b>Dir: Don Siegel <br />Cast: Kevin McCarthy, Dana Wyner, King Donovan, Carolyn Jones</b><br />It&#8217;s here already! It&#8217;s next! It&#8217;s next! Yes it&#8217;s my review of the 50s,  Sci-Fi/Horror classic, <i>Invasion of the Body Snatchers</i>. Culturally significant not only for it&#8217;s shock value but for it&#8217;s complex themes of alienation in modern mass society. In the era of <i>McCarthyism</i>, <i>Invasion</i> stood out with&#8217;s anti-conformist message. Though that could be a load of bull-honky over analyzation. All I know for sure is that this is a great sci-fi story that still resonates with audiences today. </p>
<p>Miles Bennell (Kevin McCarthy) is a doctor in the fictional town of Santa Mira, California. Unexpectedly, a large amount of patients start coming to him complaining of their loved ones now being &#8220;impostors.&#8221; This is dismissed as mass hysteria but it&#8217;s not long after that Bennell himself discovers the secret. That these emotionless &#8220;Pod People&#8221; are duplicating humans in an effort take over our planet, damn, damn, double damn! So the adrenaline kicks in soon enough and what was a subtle movie soon becomes a suspenseful &#8220;On the Run&#8221; type flick. Staying awake becomes the missions for Miles and his friends as it&#8217;s the only way to stay alive. </p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TK7EhSJ36JI/AAAAAAAABok/VRw8Pe4yCBU/s1600/Podpeeps1_monster_397x224.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 249px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TK7EhSJ36JI/AAAAAAAABok/VRw8Pe4yCBU/s320/Podpeeps1_monster_397x224.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5525569868918155410" /></a></p>
<p>The Pod People are damn freaky and it almost as a bit of a <i>Twilight Zone</i> vibe. It was produced by Walter Wanger and directed by who else but Don Siegel who would go on to be famous for his Clint Eastwood collaborations such as; <i>Coogan&#8217;s Bluff (1968)</i>, <i>Dirty Harry (1971)</i> and <i>Escape from Alcatraz (1979)</i>. Daniel Mainwaring was the man responsible for adapting the script from Jack Finney&#8217;s story, not a bad job either. And can you believe this movie has been remade &#8220;Three times?&#8221; It&#8217;s just a really remakeable movie I suppose, just wait another ten or fifteen years, I bet it&#8217;s not over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=751</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 7</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=750</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=750#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 07:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[House of Wax (1953) Dir: Andre de Toth Cast: Vincent Price, Frank Lovejoy, Carolyn Jones, Roy Roberts, Charles BronsonNo not the spellbinding work featuring the immense talents of Chad Michael Murray and Paris Hilton, nor the version from 1933 starring Lionel Atwill, it&#8217;s the 50s classic starring the always devious VIncent Price. Groundbreaking for being [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">House of Wax (1953)</span></td>
<td width="150"><i"http://sites.google.com/damorgue.org/home/" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TK157bPwn7I/AAAAAAAABoc/PcMPLqttxIA/s1600/house_of_wax+new+poster.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 214px; height: 320px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TK157bPwn7I/AAAAAAAABoc/PcMPLqttxIA/s320/house_of_wax+new+poster.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5525206379686567858" /></a><br /><b>Dir: Andre de Toth <br />Cast: Vincent Price, Frank Lovejoy, Carolyn Jones, Roy Roberts, Charles Bronson</b><br />No not the spellbinding work featuring the immense talents of Chad Michael Murray and Paris Hilton, nor the version from 1933 starring Lionel Atwill, it&#8217;s the 50s classic starring the always devious VIncent Price. Groundbreaking for being the first 3D color film to be released by a major American Studio. Naturally this would go on to fuel the 50s 3-D craze but aside from all that this is just a great thriller with a great star. </p>
<p>The iconic Vincent Price stars as Professor Henry Jarrod, a skilled wax sculptor with a museum in 1910s New York. When his financial partner Matthew demands new exhibits to increase profits, Jarrod refuses so Matthew burns that mutha down! Later on Jarrod recovers and builds a new wax museum that showcases most notably the &#8220;Chamber of Horrors&#8221;. Matthew and his fiancee gets what he deserves and a bunch of other people die. It&#8217;s all good, but what&#8217;s unfortunate is the movie can&#8217;t really live up to the opening scene. I guess I could just watch wax melt all day long, it&#8217;s a real trip. </p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TK15y4bJv8I/AAAAAAAABoU/mSm9bLfr4Ls/s1600/HOUSE_OF_WAX_1953-2.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 240px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TK15y4bJv8I/AAAAAAAABoU/mSm9bLfr4Ls/s320/HOUSE_OF_WAX_1953-2.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5525206232900157378" /></a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s a film propelled by grand, grim, imagery and strong performances. Vincent Price steals the show and a young Charles Bronson as Price&#8217;s deaf/mute assistant is entertaining. Unfortunately I&#8217;ve never had the pleasure of seeing it in 3D, which is a shame as a few scenes don&#8217;t really make sense in 2D. Like this scene where a guy is entertaining passerby&#8217;s with a paddle ball, it makes no sense, but maybe it looked cool in 3D. That aside the film&#8217;s got a nice little twist near the end that I bet you could figure out in less than ten guesses, but it&#8217;s a fun ride. If you like Vincent Price movies this should be at the top of your list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=750</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dormroom Billionaire</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=749</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=749#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 22:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=749</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Social Network Everyone already knows how big Facebook is today. The website’s addictive nature, privacy problems, massive influence, it is all common knowledge. So the idea of “Facebook: The Movie” did not initially sound like the most interesting project talents like writer Aaron Sorkin and director David Fincher should be investing their time in. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><i>The Social Network</i></span></td>
<td width="150"><img border="0" padding="0" src="http://mildlypleased.com/wp-content/uploads/rating/4.0.png" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TKz5o8NkHwI/AAAAAAAAA6k/Zt8lG9sPBY0/s1600/Social_network_film_poster.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TKz5o8NkHwI/AAAAAAAAA6k/Zt8lG9sPBY0/s320/Social_network_film_poster.jpg" width="216" /></a></div>
<p>Everyone already knows how big Facebook is today. The website’s addictive nature, privacy problems, massive influence, it is all common knowledge. So the idea of “Facebook: The Movie” did not initially sound like the most interesting project talents like writer Aaron Sorkin and director David Fincher should be investing their time in.</p>
<p>But <i>The Social Network</i> is much more than a movie about a website. Indeed, Facebook itself is hardly seen in the movie. The filmmakers instead focus on the real-life drama that surrounded the website’s development.</p>
<p>Mark Zuckerberg (Jesse Eisenberg) is the genius who co-founded Facebook with the help of fellow Harvard students. He is involved into two legal battles, one with his best friend and one with three other students who say they came up with the idea for Facebook. As the film travels back a few years, it shows how these people got to the point of suing each other.</p>
<p>After his girlfriend dumps him, Zuckerberg gets drunk and starts a website called “FaceMash,” which takes pictures of female students from Harvard dorm face books and lets browsers pick who is the most attractive. The page is quickly shut down, but lasts long enough for Zuckerberg to attract the interest of some other students looking to create an exclusive social network for Harvard students. Zuckerberg starts working for them, but finds himself developing an idea that eventually becomes Facebook.</p>
<p>None of that sounds particularly interesting, but Sorkin’s script is so full of witty banter that it is riveting. Of course this is enhanced by the Fincher’s excellent direction, which always puts the camera exactly where it should be. Even the soundtrack by Nine Inch Nail’s Trent Reznor makes it clear that these are not simply nerds who spend all their time in front of computer screens, but the rock stars of our time.</p>
<p>Despite all his intellect, Zuckerberg ironically has trouble connecting with people. Eisenberg’s performance is wonderful in that it makes Zuckerberg somewhat sympathetic, while also a huge jerk. He handles Sorkin’s dialogue with ease and puts an end to any debate of whether he is the indie Michael Cera.</p>
<p>The rest of the cast, including new Spider-Man Andrew Garfield as Zuckerberg’s best friend Eduardo Saverin, ably performs. Justin Timberlake is great as Sean Parker, the creator of Napster and apparently the coolest guy in the world of Internet entrepreneurialism. Also worth noting is Armie Hammer, who plays the Winklevoss twins, two amusing stereotypical Harvard men.</p>
<p>In some ways, <i>The Social Network</i> is old fashioned. It is a classical tale of a rise to power, full of greed, lust, and betrayal. That it is able to make an interesting, accessible story about subjects as complex as computer programming and depositions is remarkable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=749</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>111</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 6</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=748</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=748#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 17:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein (1948) Dir: Charles BartonCast: Bud Abbott, Lou Costello, Lon Chaney Jr, Bela Lugosi, Glenn Strange, Lenore Aubert, Jane RandolphI&#8217;d originally planned to do Val Lewton&#8217;s Cat People but due to poor planning, I&#8217;ll dust off this &#8216;ol gem instead. Though in a way this is just important as it might [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein (1948)</span></td>
<td width="150"><i"http://sites.google.com/damorgue.org/home/" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TKyuaVvDlqI/AAAAAAAABoM/MSWQ7acVzjM/s1600/A%26cfrank.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 231px; height: 340px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TKyuaVvDlqI/AAAAAAAABoM/MSWQ7acVzjM/s320/A%26cfrank.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5524982610411099810" /></a><br /><b>Dir: Charles Barton<br />Cast: Bud Abbott, Lou Costello, Lon Chaney Jr, Bela Lugosi, Glenn Strange, Lenore Aubert, Jane Randolph</b><br />I&#8217;d originally planned to do Val Lewton&#8217;s <i>Cat People</i> but due to poor planning, I&#8217;ll dust off this &#8216;ol gem instead. Though in a way this is just important as it might be the first great horror/comedy, at least the first that comes to my mind. What happens when you cross old school comedy with old school horror? Sheer brilliance, with no shortage of scenes where are duo wander in rooms, blissfully unaware of monster&#8217;s right behind them. Like this one scene where Costello sits on the Frankenstein Monsters lap and&#8211; Maybe I should first explain how all these characters are in the same movie. </p>
<p>Bud Abbott and Lou Costello play Chic and Wilbur, railway baggage clerks in LaMirada, Florida. The film opens with Lon Chaney Jr. reprising his role as &#8220;The Wolfman&#8221; calling the depot and begging them to hold two packages until he gets there. Unfortunately he&#8217;s in London and it just happens to be a full moon. The conversation carries on with Wilbur thinking his talking to a dog until another man named McDougal shows up and requests the same two packages. He claims to have acquired them for his &#8220;House of Horrors&#8221; and also claim that they are indeed the bodies of Count Dracula (Bela Lugosi) and Frankenstein&#8217;s Monster (Glenn Strange.) McDougal demands the duo deliver them in person to his museum and hilarity ensues. </p>
<p>Later on we find out that a woman named Sandra (Lenore Aubert) is seducing Wilbur so she (partnered with Dracula) can put Wilbur&#8217;s brain in the Frankenstein Monster. Why? I have absolutely no idea, but it&#8217;s a hilarious haunted romp. Abbott and Costello have such incredible chemistry and their routine never gets old. Lou Costello is the simple minded, clumsy, moron while Bud Abbott fills the often underrated role of the pissed off straight man. As Groucho Marx once said regarding Abbott &#8220;He&#8217;s the Greatest Straight Man Ever.&#8221; I felt that was worth addressing as he&#8217;s often overshadowed by the silliness of his partner.</p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TKyuQzd4TXI/AAAAAAAABoE/9V_ugovYSF8/s1600/abbott_and_costello_meet_frankenstein1.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 256px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TKyuQzd4TXI/AAAAAAAABoE/9V_ugovYSF8/s320/abbott_and_costello_meet_frankenstein1.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5524982446593428850" /></a></p>
<p>What&#8217;s amazing is it&#8217;s actually a fairly good horror film as well. Anytime Universal is involved you know it&#8217;ll go that extra mile and it does. I mean the story is pretty moronic but it is also a comedy so it finds a pleasing mid ground. Lon Chaney Jr. and Bela Lugosi are a real treat to see fighting together and although you miss the presence of Karloff, Glenn Strange is a suitable Frankenstein&#8217;s Monster. </p>
<p>Abbot and Costello made dozens of films together and from what I&#8217;ve heard this is supposedly one of their best, at least their most famous. It brought classic comedy and horror fans into the same theater and there&#8217;s nothing wrong with that. I might even check out some more Abbott and Costello flicks after Halloween. Then again they do have several other horror related flicks, hmm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=748</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 5</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=747</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=747#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Invisible Man (1933) Dir: James WhaleCast: Claude Rains, Gloria Stuart, William Harrigan, Henry TraversClaude Rains has provided some excellent supporting roles in some of the greatest films of all time . Senator Payne in Mr. Smith Goes to Washington (1939), Capt. Louis Renault in Casablanca (1942), Alexander Sebastian in Notorious (1946), Mr. Dryden in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">The Invisible Man (1933)</span></td>
<td width="150"><i"http://sites.google.com/damorgue.org/home/" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TKoIrLyxrqI/AAAAAAAABnc/TiWhnbXhT00/s1600/The-Invisible-Man.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 231px; height: 340px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TKoIrLyxrqI/AAAAAAAABnc/TiWhnbXhT00/s320/The-Invisible-Man.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5524237430916492962" /></a><br /><b>Dir: James Whale<br />Cast: Claude Rains, Gloria Stuart, William Harrigan, Henry Travers</b><br />Claude Rains has provided some excellent supporting roles in some of the greatest films of all time . Senator Payne in <i>Mr. Smith Goes to Washington (1939)</i>, Capt. Louis Renault in <i>Casablanca (1942)</i>, Alexander Sebastian in <i>Notorious (1946)</i>, Mr. Dryden in <i>Lawrence of Arabia (1962)</i>, but it&#8217;s for his starring role in Universal&#8217;s <i>The Invisible Man (1933)</i> that I&#8217;ll always remember him. After all it is the film that jump started his career and his performance as the insane Dr. Jack Griffin is timeless. </p>
<p>Universal had originally planned this feature to be another Boris Karloff vehicle, but due to salary disputes Karloff eventually withdrew. Cyril Garnder would also step down as director handing the reigns to who else but James Whale of <i>Frankenstein</i> fame. Wanting a strong &#8220;intellectual voice&#8221; Whale chose stage actor Claude Rains to play the doomed scientist. Gloria Stuart (who passed away just recently) would play his love interest and horror movie history was made. </p>
<p>What I love about <i>The Invisible Man</i> is how it starts out after he&#8217;s already contracted the mutation. He enters a small English village, wrapped tightly in bandages, as his secret is slowly revealed. Really this wouldn&#8217;t of been quite as effective if it wasn&#8217;t for John P. Fulton, John J. Mescall and Frank D. Williams visual effects. There&#8217;s some creepy stuff going on here and it&#8217;s propelled even more by that old school Universal charm.</p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TKoHWGve72I/AAAAAAAABnM/wtkpv_aa0dk/s1600/invisible-man.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 223px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TKoHWGve72I/AAAAAAAABnM/wtkpv_aa0dk/s320/invisible-man.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5524235969271623522" /></a></p>
<p>Being Universal, the sets and production value are naturally top notch. I don&#8217;t think many would argue against the 30s being the golden age of horror and this is a fine example. Great stars, great sets, good humor, and of course great scares. On a side note even author H.G. Wells was a fan, though he had mixed feelings about changing the lead character from a sympathetic figure to an insane one. Well it would appear that I&#8217;m running out of trivia tidbits, so let&#8217;s &#8220;wrap&#8221; it up huh? Get it cause he wears like bandages?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=747</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober Shenanigans</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=746</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=746#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 06:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Somehow I messed up my dates when compiling my Shocktober list. I accidentally posted The Invisible Man and Vampyr instead of a film I&#8217;d planned to put before. So to keep an organized timeline, I&#8217;m gonna change some shit up. I&#8217;m just posting this brief comment so that folks know what&#8217;s going on, that&#8217;s all, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TKrHva3ZxNI/AAAAAAAABns/iaUvuxEK3x0/s1600/CUbridehand.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 177px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TKrHva3ZxNI/AAAAAAAABns/iaUvuxEK3x0/s400/CUbridehand.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5524447510402811090" /></a><br />Somehow I messed up my dates when compiling my Shocktober list. I accidentally posted <i>The Invisible Man</i> and <i>Vampyr</i> instead of a film I&#8217;d planned to put before. So to keep an organized timeline, I&#8217;m gonna change some shit up. I&#8217;m just posting this brief comment so that folks know what&#8217;s going on, that&#8217;s all, let us continue the creepiness!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=746</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Da Podcasket Episode 05</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=745</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=745#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 09:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kevin Lemme, of kevinlemme.com, returns along with Colin&#8217;s Internet quality in this latest episode of Da Podcasket. There&#8217;s a lot to talk about and da gang aren&#8217;t afraid to get into it. The fall TV season, The Social Network and new video games are the focus of serious consternation. Plus, it wouldn&#8217;t be Da Podcasket [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/S-iuh1PHKfI/AAAAAAAAAxw/sUEjt5aW_k0/s1600/podcasket.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/S-iuh1PHKfI/AAAAAAAAAxw/sUEjt5aW_k0/s200/podcasket.png" width="200" /></a></div>
<p>Kevin Lemme, of <a href="http://kevinlemme.com/">kevinlemme.com</a>, returns along with Colin&#8217;s Internet quality in this latest episode of Da Podcasket. There&#8217;s a lot to talk about and da gang aren&#8217;t afraid to get into it. The fall TV season, <i>The Social Network</i> and new video games are the focus of serious consternation. Plus, it wouldn&#8217;t be Da Podcasket without a hearty helping of baseball talk, in a hit segment that makes you equally sad for the Mariners and happy for the Giants. Enjoy!</p>
<p><b>Listen to the Podcast:</b></p>
<p><center><embed height="27" src="http://www.google.com/reader/ui/3523697345-audio-player.swf?audioUrl=http://dl.dropbox.com/u/293293/podcast_05.mp3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="320" wmode="transparent"></embed></p>
<p>[<a href="http://dl.dropbox.com/u/293293/podcast_05.mp3">Download</a>]<br />[<a href="http://www.damorgue.org/feeds/posts/default">Feed</a>]</center></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=745</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>98</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 4</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=744</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=744#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vampyr (1932) Dir: Carl Theodor Dreyer Cast: Julian West, Rena Mandel, Sybille Schmitz,, Jan Hieronimko, Henriette Gerard, Maurice SchultzWere going a little on the obscure side today with the German produced Vampyr, a silent film that plays out like a hallucinogenic nightmare. Directed by Danish filmmaker Carl Theodor Dreyer, Vampyr is an oddity in that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Vampyr (1932)</span></td>
<td width="150"><i"http://sites.google.com/damorgue.org/home/" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TKizPTe-0jI/AAAAAAAABm8/eZJI1C7-Rj0/s1600/vampyr.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 227px; height: 320px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TKizPTe-0jI/AAAAAAAABm8/eZJI1C7-Rj0/s320/vampyr.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5523862018479542834" /></a><br /><b>Dir: Carl Theodor Dreyer <br />Cast: Julian West, Rena Mandel, Sybille Schmitz,, Jan Hieronimko, Henriette Gerard, Maurice Schultz</b><br />Were going a little on the obscure side today with the German produced <i>Vampyr</i>, a silent film that plays out like a hallucinogenic nightmare. Directed by Danish filmmaker Carl Theodor Dreyer, <i>Vampyr</i> is an oddity in that despite being made in the era of sound is a silent film. Dreyer being accustomed to making silent films had difficulty making the transition, thus he made a semi-silent film that&#8217;s a peculiar blending of both eras. Like Chaplin&#8217;s <i>Modern Times</i>, there is sound but it is used sparingly and for the most part it is effective.</p>
<p>The film was funded by aristocrat Nicolas de Gunzburg who in exchange for his donation got to star in the film. Non-professionals made up most of the cast and with the low key nature of this film, it&#8217;s quite befitting. Gunzburg (using the alias &#8220;Julian West&#8221;) plays Allan Gray, a man fascinated by the occult who travels to a village in Paris cursed by supernatural creatures. These creatures being &#8220;Vampyrs&#8221; who lure people into committing suicide so that they can become servants for satan. Aside from that the story is kept fairly simple, unraveling at a slow but suspenseful pace. </p>
<p>The years haven&#8217;t been kind to the film&#8217;s so-so image quality, but that aside there&#8217;s a remarkable atmosphere being crafted here. Filmed on location in various French villages, it feels quite authentic and upholds a certain kind of eerie beauty. It really is more of an indie &#8220;Avant-garde&#8221; piece, possibly some visual metaphors tucked away and on that level it&#8217;s quite complex. Watching it was like watching a muddled nightmare that I enjoyed being sucked into. </p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TKizZgDiAOI/AAAAAAAABnE/0tJQMvZozWU/s1600/vampyr-1.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 234px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TKizZgDiAOI/AAAAAAAABnE/0tJQMvZozWU/s320/vampyr-1.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5523862193652760802" /></a></p>
<p>The downside here is that this film was made in 1932. Compare that to the kind of horror films were being made in the states. Films like Universal&#8217;s <i>Dracula</i>, <i>Frankenstein</i> and <i>The Mummy</i>, those wore excellently produced, with great sound, and sharp image quality. By comparison <i>Vampyr</i> looks like a pile of garbage. Of course it didn&#8217;t have a big studio behind it like Universal, but it definitely feels severely dated. If it had been made ten, even five years earlier maybe it would&#8217;ve of received more recognition, but who knows. Either way it&#8217;s an intriguing curiosity for horror fans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=744</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 3</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=743</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=743#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2010 16:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=743</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (1931) Dir: Rouben MamoulianCast: Fredric March, Miriam Hopkins, Rose Hobart, Holmes Herbert, Halliwell HobbesThis list has it&#8217;s fair share of critical darlings but it&#8217;s Paramount&#8217;s Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde that achieved one golden accolade rarely bestowed upon horror movies. Yes, star Fredric March took home the Oscar for Best [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (1931)</span></td>
<td width="150"><i"http://sites.google.com/damorgue.org/home/" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TKrJ5C7iEqI/AAAAAAAABn8/i3pfnbq7_k8/s1600/JekyllHyde1931.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 241px; height: 320px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TKrJ5C7iEqI/AAAAAAAABn8/i3pfnbq7_k8/s320/JekyllHyde1931.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5524449874799628962" /></a><br /><b>Dir: Rouben Mamoulian<br />Cast: Fredric March, Miriam Hopkins, Rose Hobart, Holmes Herbert, Halliwell Hobbes</b><br />This list has it&#8217;s fair share of critical darlings but it&#8217;s Paramount&#8217;s <i>Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde</i> that achieved one golden accolade rarely bestowed upon  horror movies. Yes, star Fredric March took home the Oscar for Best Actor, playing a mad scientist who turns into a monster? Not the kind of performance you&#8217;d expect the Academy to honor but it&#8217;s so good that I&#8217;m sure there were no regrets. Fredric March is both charming and chilling in this creepy classic, possibly the greatest adaption of Robert Louis Stevenson&#8217;s iconic tale.</p>
<p>Henry Jekyll (March) is a highly respected medical doctor who claims that within each man lurks powerful impulses for both good and evil. Speaking at a university, Jekyll tells his colleagues that he believes it&#8217;s possible to divide these two personas to eliminate evil. So what happens when he tries it out? You guessed it, the evil side takes over and creates nothing but mischief. </p>
<p>Typically in this kind of film you&#8217;d expect most of the drama and key scenes to come from the tormented Jekyll, but it is actually Hyde who receives the most development and screen time. Rather than being a simple thuggish monster that grunts an groans, Mr. Hyde is an articulate man but with devious intentions. He cackles at those he torments and frightens with his gruesome appearance. It&#8217;s an endlessly entertaining performance and though March is fantastic in both roles, I have to lean towards the monster. </p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TKrJvoKTO5I/AAAAAAAABn0/ogkNLE6XNW8/s1600/jekyllandhyde.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 179px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TKrJvoKTO5I/AAAAAAAABn0/ogkNLE6XNW8/s320/jekyllandhyde.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5524449712994990994" /></a></p>
<p>Made just prior to the enforcement of the &#8220;Production Code&#8221; it is often remembered for it&#8217;s strong sexual content, but it&#8217;s fairly tame by today&#8217;s standards. Something that amazingly still holds up is Jekyll&#8217;s fantastic transformation scene, accomplished by using a series of colored filters that puts the campy yet memorable <i>Wolf Man</i> transformation from the 40s to shame and this was ten year earlier! It&#8217;s another one of the many gems of the golden age of horror, check it out if you (like Edward Norton) are a fan of duality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=743</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>103</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 2</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=742</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=742#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2010 05:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Hunchback of Notre Dame (1923) Dir: Wallace Worsley Cast: Lon Chaney, Patsy Ruth Miller, Norman Kerry, Kate Lester, Brandon HurstThere were many legends of the silent screen, but few could be considered the &#8220;face&#8221; of their genre. In the 1920s horror had but one name: Lon Chaney, &#8220;The Man of a Thousand Faces.&#8221; A [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">The Hunchback of Notre Dame  (1923)</span></td>
<td width="150"><i"http://sites.google.com/damorgue.org/home/" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TKgagrXlHlI/AAAAAAAABms/HIuVtsKMWO4/s1600/hunchback_of_notre_dame.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 195px; height: 320px;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TKgagrXlHlI/AAAAAAAABms/HIuVtsKMWO4/s320/hunchback_of_notre_dame.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5523694091669675602" /></a><br /><b>Dir: Wallace Worsley <br />Cast: Lon Chaney, Patsy Ruth Miller, Norman Kerry, Kate Lester, Brandon Hurst</b><br />There were many legends of the silent screen, but few could be considered the &#8220;face&#8221; of their genre. In the 1920s horror had but one name: Lon Chaney, &#8220;The Man of a Thousand Faces.&#8221; A man so dedicated to creating memorable characters that he&#8217;d put his own face through extensive makeup work to transform himself.  For the film in question Chaney donned a knotted wig, nose putty, false teeth, a fake eye and a 15lb hump, and yet his performance shines through.</p>
<p>We all know the story to <i>The Hunchback of Notre Dame</i> somewhat. Quasimodo is as a deformed bell-ringer who falls in love with beautiful Esmeralda, he is manipulated by the Archdeacon Frollo, forced to kidnap Esmeralda, gets between the budding romance of Esmeralda and Captain Phoebus, and it ends in tragedy. This version is a fairly faithful adaptation of Victor Hugo&#8217;s novel and is captured quite nicely with sets that take you right back to the 15th century. Though it&#8217;s Chaney&#8217;s twisted performance that has made this film the classic it is. Not to mention it&#8217;s an early trailblazer for the &#8220;Monster falls in love with Woman&#8221; sub-genre.</p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TKgatbM8m3I/AAAAAAAABm0/7st5IFqCkd4/s1600/lonchaneyhunchback.jpg"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 260px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TKgatbM8m3I/AAAAAAAABm0/7st5IFqCkd4/s320/lonchaneyhunchback.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5523694310668409714" /></a></p>
<p>The film would go on to be Universal&#8217;s most successful silent film and grossed over $3 million. Chaney would go on to star in perhaps his most notable role as <i>The Phantom of the Opera</i>, but tragically passed away five years later at the age of 47. Today he has a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame, a stamp, and perhaps most importantly, a thriving fan base in the horror community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=742</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>80s Week Wrap Up</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=741</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=741#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2010 05:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By the Power of Greyskull we&#8217;ve done it! Another successful theme week. Successful in that we actually managed to think of enough pop culture junk to fill the week. All in all I think it was a worthy venture, even if we are children of the 90s, I think we did the 80s justice. So [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the Power of Greyskull we&#8217;ve done it! Another successful theme week. Successful in that we actually managed to think of enough pop culture junk to fill the week. All in all I think it was a worthy venture, even if we are children of the 90s, I think we did the 80s justice. So I figured I&#8217;d just leave you with our little 80s homage from a  few years back. Hope this was everything you wished it could be and check back for more &#8220;Shocktober&#8221; posts throughout the month, cowabunga dudes!</p>
<p><iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/14877024?byline=0&amp;portrait=0" width="440" height="330" frameborder="0"></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=741</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>80s Week: Greatest Mariner&#8217;s of the 1980&#8242;s</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=740</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=740#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2010 05:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Ten]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 1980 Seattle Mariners are a strange bunch. We don&#8217;t really know much about them, besides cool ones. Alvin Davis, Harold Reynolds, etc. Even Mark Langston seems like a bit of a stretch for people of our generation. We had no emotional connection to these players. They never won anything, they seldom did anything worth [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object height="385" width="440"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/cjwML_f-Fo4?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/cjwML_f-Fo4?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="440" height="385"></embed></object></p>
<p>The 1980 Seattle Mariners are a strange bunch. We don&#8217;t really know much about them, besides cool ones. Alvin Davis, Harold Reynolds, etc. Even Mark Langston seems like a bit of a stretch for people of our generation. We had no emotional connection to these players. They never won anything, they seldom did anything worth personal recognition (with a few exception&#8217;s we&#8217;ll discover), and they were so bad sometimes they cast a shadow of hatred over themselves that can never be undone. (IE my father&#8217;s eternal disdain for Dave Valle). But none the less they are a part of our beloved history as Mariner fans and I feel like we all owe it to ourselves to learn a little about our rich historical tradition.</p>
<p>So without further ado, I give you the greatest Mariners of the 1980&#8242;s.</p>
<p><a href="http://cardboardgods.files.wordpress.com/2009/01/2008_825_0001_tom_paciorek_79_1080.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" id="il_fi" src="http://cardboardgods.files.wordpress.com/2009/01/2008_825_0001_tom_paciorek_79_1080.jpg" width="140" /></a><b>10. Tom Paciorek, LF</b><br />Since I really don&#8217;t have an emotional connection with any of the players I&#8217;m about to list, I used cold heartless Wins Above Replacement (WAR) to judge them like robots in cages, fighting to the death. Tom Paciorek was drafted in the 5th round by the Dodgers in 1968 and made is MLB debut a few years later in 1970. After six some odd years playing off the bench for the Dodgers he went to Atlanta, was released after five games, and signed as a free agent with your own Seattle Mariners.</p>
<p>He made this list because of his 1981 season when he led the team with 3.9 WAR. To put that in perspective Ichiro has 3.9 WAR this season. In &#8217;81 Paciorek or Wimpy as some fondly called him batted .326/.379/.509 slugging a legendary team second 14 home runs. I&#8217;m sure he&#8217;s a great guy.</p>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div>
<p><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PFumx8y0cA4/SNPTKf3LbOI/AAAAAAAAAFc/UFyRa95kTKo/s1600/9.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" id="il_fi" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PFumx8y0cA4/SNPTKf3LbOI/AAAAAAAAAFc/UFyRa95kTKo/s200/9.jpg" width="144" /></a><b>9. Scott Bankhead, P</b><br />The M&#8217;s traded for Bankhead in 1986 for some players you&#8217;ve never heard of. He then had a couple okay seasons and then posted a 4.2 WAR in 1989. He threw 210 innings, about 80 more then he previously had thrown in his career. He finished the year 14-6 and was named co-MVP of the team along with Alvin Davis. Good for him.
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div>
<p><a href="http://www.morthas.com/cards/83F_471_Bannister.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" id="il_fi" src="http://www.morthas.com/cards/83F_471_Bannister.jpg" width="144" /></a><b>8. Floyd Bannister, P</b><br />A local boy hailing from Burien, Wash., Bannister run as a mediocre pitcher for the M&#8217;s in the early 80&#8242;s. He made the All-Star team in 1982 when he accumulated 4.3 WAR which was good for 6th in the American League. He also lead the league in strike outs that year with 209.
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div>
<p><a href="http://www.baseball-almanac.com/players/pics/jim_beattie_autograph.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" id="il_fi" src="http://www.baseball-almanac.com/players/pics/jim_beattie_autograph.jpg" width="143" /></a><b>7. Jim Beattie, P</b><br />Now besides the few stars we&#8217;ll get to in a minute, most of the players on this list are pitchers. It&#8217;s pretty interesting that the M&#8217;s had some decent talent on the mound throughout the 80&#8242;s because they&#8217;re position players were JUST AWFUL. Terrible. So bad.</p>
<p>Beattie joined the M&#8217;s in 1980 after two years being okay to bad for the Yankees. He struggled for a couple years posting 5.21 and 4.85 ERA&#8217;s in 1980 and 81, but then posted a 2.97 ERA in 1981. Oh wait, he only started nine games.<b>&nbsp;</b> He really wasn&#8217;t that good. Only a 1.6 WAR. But still lead the pitchers for that team in WAR. Man the Mariners were bad.
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div>
<p>Anyways, his break out season came in 1984 when he posted a 4.8 WAR just narrowly beating out up and comer Mark Langston who had a 4.4. Being a good pitcher must have really rubbed him the wrong way because he the next year he sucked and the year after that he sucked some more and then he retired. Must have been depressed that in the second year of his career he won a World Series, then went off to rot on one of the worst franchises the baseball world had ever seen.</p>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div>
<p><a href="http://www.baseball-almanac.com/players/pics/matt_young_autograph.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" id="il_fi" src="http://www.baseball-almanac.com/players/pics/matt_young_autograph.jpg" width="143" /></a><b>6. Matt Young, P</b><br />Young, best known for pitching a no-hitter and losing while with the Red Sox, was drafted by the M&#8217;s and spent his first three seasons with the Mariners. His break out year was also his Rookie year as he cracked the top ten in ERA for the American League. It also lead to an All Star appearance and a team leading 4.8 WAR.
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div>
<p><a href="http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:3UtqJm-3Bt_fBM:http://i217.photobucket.com/albums/cc33/WaxHeaven/Wax%20Heaven%20Images/mike.jpg&amp;t=1" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" id="il_fi" src="http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:3UtqJm-3Bt_fBM:http://i217.photobucket.com/albums/cc33/WaxHeaven/Wax%20Heaven%20Images/mike.jpg&amp;t=1" style="padding-right: 30px;" width="138" /></a><b>5. Mike Moore, P</b><br />I&#8217;m sick of writing about pitchers. Mike Moore was one of the M&#8217;s many first pick over all&#8217;s, his coming in 1981. He made his debut just a year later, but it wasn&#8217;t until 1985 when he posted a 5.6 WAR establishing himself above the rest of the M&#8217;s pitching staff. Like well beyond the rest. That was a really bad staff, the closest coming to Moore was Ed Nunez who was only worth 1.6 WAR.</p>
<p>Moore would have a great &#8217;86 season as well leading the league in games started, batters faced, and third in HBP. Is that good?</p>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div>
<p><a href="http://www.baseballtoddsdugout.com/1986ToppsPhilBradley.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" id="il_fi" src="http://www.baseballtoddsdugout.com/1986ToppsPhilBradley.jpg" width="142" /></a><b>4. Phil Bradley, LF</b><br />Bradley led the position players on the Mariners in WAR from 1985-87, which is not really that impressive when you think about his colleagues. But none the less 1985 was a big year for Bradley hitting .300 with a career high 26 home runs, a mark that he would not even come close to the rest of his career.
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div>
<p><a href="http://www.baseball-almanac.com/players/pics/harold_reynolds_autograph.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" id="il_fi" src="http://www.baseball-almanac.com/players/pics/harold_reynolds_autograph.jpg" width="142" /></a><b>3. Harold Reynolds, 2B</b><br />For as much as we adore Harold for his smooth looks and ways with the ladies, he really only had one or two good seasons for the M&#8217;s. He of course had his league leading 60 stolen base season in &#8217;87, but he wasn&#8217;t much of a threat at the plate. He hit for an okay average, didn&#8217;t walk a lot, and hit for zero power. He did win three straight Gold Gloves for the M&#8217;s from 1988-1990. I feel like I&#8217;m really down on my number three on the list, but looking at these stats, I guess it&#8217;s like the current Mariner squad. The standard of good is lowered when you totally suck.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a sweet video to break up the monotony of this depressing list. </p>
<p><object height="385" width="480"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/8DUr3sfd5fQ?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/8DUr3sfd5fQ?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="440" height="385"></embed></object></p>
<p><a href="http://www.baseball-almanac.com/players/pics/alvin_davis_autograph.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" id="il_fi" src="http://www.baseball-almanac.com/players/pics/alvin_davis_autograph.jpg" width="142" /></a><b>2. Alvin Davis, 1B</b><br />Finally, Mr. Mariner! I grew up knowing who Alvin Davis was just because of his nickname and my life size growth chart I had to check my height. Davis was if nothing consistent. The big year came his first when he won Rookie of the Year honors with .284/.391/.497 batting line and 27 dingers. He would drop down to 18 homers the next two years but then bounce back with 29 in &#8217;87. He was always good for a decent average, a lot of walks, and a good amount of HR&#8217;s.&nbsp; I&#8217;m glad to say he&#8217;s one of the players on this list who was an actual contributor to the M&#8217;s for a long period of time.</p>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div>
<p><a href="http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:RBMGp_gNq7kQAM:http://img36.imageshack.us/img36/4161/89udlangston.jpg&amp;t=1" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" id="il_fi" src="http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:RBMGp_gNq7kQAM:http://img36.imageshack.us/img36/4161/89udlangston.jpg&amp;t=1" style="padding-right: 30px;" width="143" /></a><b>1. Mark Langston</b><br />Now we get to the man who brought us Randy Johnson. Mark Langston was the M&#8217;s first true #1 ace. He led the league in strike outs in &#8217;84, &#8217;86, and &#8217;87, as well as a slew of Gold Gloves if that matters. He had four 4+ WAR seasons with the M&#8217;s and represented us in the All-Star game twice. Plus he brought us back Randy Johnson in his trade to Montreal making the 80&#8242;s worth while for M&#8217;s fans in the 90&#8242;s.</p>
<p>I really encourage everyone to look for video on these players because there are tons of You Tube slide show tribute songs written but people that think they&#8217;re really cool, but I&#8217;d be very interested to see some actual video. Everyone knows the Mariners sucked in the 80&#8242;s, but they were still Mariners and it&#8217;s important to know you&#8217;re baseball heritage, ya know?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=740</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Day 1</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=739</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=739#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Oct 2010 00:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Frankenstein (1910) Dir: J. Searle DawleyCast: Augustus Phillips, Charles Ogle, Mary FullerThe year is 1910; a loaf of bread costs five cents, Theodore Roosevelt became the first president to ride a plane, Mother Teresa is born, and Edison Studios releases Frankenstein, one of the first horror films ever made. You could possibly categorize some of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">Frankenstein (1910)</span></td>
<td width="150"><i"http://sites.google.com/damorgue.org/home/" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TKbWYiHY0RI/AAAAAAAABmk/7U4t7MSpKjw/s1600/Frank-1910bis.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 210px; height: 300px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TKbWYiHY0RI/AAAAAAAABmk/7U4t7MSpKjw/s320/Frank-1910bis.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5523337709979488530" /></a><br /><b>Dir: J. Searle Dawley<br />Cast: Augustus Phillips, Charles Ogle, Mary Fuller</b><br />The year is 1910; a loaf of bread costs five cents, Theodore Roosevelt became the first president to ride a plane, Mother Teresa is born, and Edison Studios releases <i>Frankenstein</i>, one of the first horror films ever made. You could possibly categorize some of Georges Méliès early shorts as &#8220;horror&#8221; but those were only about 2 minutes long this is a whopping 12! Adapted from the classic novel this version, although relatively simplistic, still manages to hit on some compelling themes.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s basic in narrative introducing Dr. Frankenstein, chronicling his experiment, the moment he creates an out of control monster, and so on. A series of title cards fill us in but they rarely seem necessary. Really, they&#8217;re painfully obvious, much in the vein of a high school yearbook caption. Though considering this film is 100 YEARS OLD! Much of these minor flaws are forgivable. Just the fact that this movie is still entertaining and interesting is a feat to marvel at.</p>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TKbWNnJQu1I/AAAAAAAABmc/buvaLupllpw/s1600/Picture14.png"><img style="cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 241px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TKbWNnJQu1I/AAAAAAAABmc/buvaLupllpw/s320/Picture14.png" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5523337522350963538" /></a></p>
<p>The ending is rather peculiar as the monster walks into a mirror, which Frankenstein then looks upon in horror. I suppose it&#8217;s addressing the matter of &#8220;Who&#8217;s the real monster?&#8221; That&#8217;s deep, it&#8217;s amazing to see such a complex idea tackled in such an early film. If anything this is fun to watch simply for the historical value, a real blast to the past.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=739</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocktober: Introduction</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=738</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=738#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Oct 2010 00:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shocktober]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hate to cut into 80s Weeks but I can&#8217;t turn back time. Yes it&#8217;s officially October 1st and that means it&#8217;s &#8220;Shocktober.&#8221; &#8220;What the hell is Shocktober?&#8221; You might say. Well that means that for every day of October I will be reviewing a notable Horror flick. Now I already did this once on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TKbUaXd6PgI/AAAAAAAABmM/uHvxKtuSOKc/s1600/wolfman2.jpg"><img style="float:left; margin:0 10px 10px 0;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 244px; height: 320px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TKbUaXd6PgI/AAAAAAAABmM/uHvxKtuSOKc/s320/wolfman2.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5523335542457646594" /></a><br />I hate to cut into 80s Weeks but I can&#8217;t turn back time. Yes it&#8217;s officially October 1st and that means it&#8217;s &#8220;Shocktober.&#8221; &#8220;What the hell is Shocktober?&#8221; You might say. Well that means that for every day of October I will be reviewing a notable Horror flick. Now I already did this once on my old blog <a href="http://johnotteni.blogspot.com/2008/10/day-1-cabinet-of-dr-caligari.html">&#8220;The Ottman Prophecies&#8221;</a>so that means most of the heavy hitters, <i>Frankenstein</i>, <i>Dracula,</i> etc will not be featured. Rather I&#8217;ll put the spotlight on some slightly more obscure titles with your occasional classic. I look forward to sharing my fondness for some of these flicks and even a few I don&#8217;t care for, but it&#8217;s all about what&#8217;s made an impact. So sit back with a nice cup of witches&#8217; brew and slip on that monster mask, it&#8217;s time for Shocktober!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=738</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>80s Week: Sean&#8217;s Lists</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=737</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=737#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Ten]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are lots of things that I like from the Eighties. Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, Transformers, G.I. Joe and a number of great cartoons that still managed to influence me in my formative years wouldn&#8217;t have happened if it wasn&#8217;t for the 1980s. It was the peak time for video game arcades, something I wish [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are lots of things that I like from the Eighties. <i>Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles</i>, <i>Transformers</i>, <i>G.I. Joe </i>and a number of great cartoons that still managed to influence me in my formative years wouldn&#8217;t have happened if it wasn&#8217;t for the 1980s. It was the peak time for video game arcades, something I wish I could have been around for more of. And let&#8217;s not forget the massive list of movies that made the decade so unique. But these lists aren&#8217;t necessarily about nostalgia. No, this is me, someone born in 1988, on the outside, looking back in.</p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-large;"><b><span style="color: #cc66cc;">Top 10 Albums of the 1980s</span></b></span></p>
<p><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TKLDaDomvqI/AAAAAAAAA6Y/lEYyJMukeHw/s1600/pixies.jpg" imageanchor="1"><img border="0" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TKLDaDomvqI/AAAAAAAAA6Y/lEYyJMukeHw/s400/pixies.jpg" width="430" /></a></p>
<p>Honestly, I&#8217;ve never been that big on 1980s music. In fact, I&#8217;ve listened to more new albums since 2009 than total albums from that entire decade. That is not to say I think Eighties music is bad, it&#8217;s just that I prefer the music that evolved from what was going on back then to that actual music. However, these next ten albums are totally tubular.</p>
<p><b>10. Michael Jackson &#8211; <i>Thriller</i> (1982)</b><br />Look, it had to be on the list. I tried to fight it, but no, you cannot deny <i>Thriller</i>. It is the Eighties, as well as one of the most important albums in pop music history. Plus, who wouldn&#8217;t prefer having an Eighties MJ around today, instead of Beaver Fever? Beaber? Bieber?</p>
<p><b>9. Dire Straits &#8211; <i>Brothers in Arms</i> (1985)</b><br />&#8220;Walk of Life&#8221; is pretty much the reason why I ever listened to this album. But I&#8217;m also a huge fan of &#8220;So Far Away,&#8221; &#8220;Money for Nothing&#8221; and, well, the rest of the record. I don&#8217;t know why, but when I think of this album, I just think &#8220;yeah, that&#8217;s boring.&#8221; And then I&#8217;ll listen to it again and remember it kicks ass. The reason why is so far away from me.</p>
<p><b>8. Talking Heads &#8211; <i>Remain in Light</i> (1980)</b><br />This is pretty much my toss-up spot. The Replacement&#8217;s <i>Let It Be</i>, Beastie Boy&#8217;s <i>Paul&#8217;s Boutique </i>and The Smith&#8217;s <i>The Queen is Dead</i> and several other albums were all in contention. Ultimately, I give it to <i>Remain in Light </i>because it&#8217;s so distinct. I can appreciate that. Also, &#8220;Once in a Lifetime.&#8221;</p>
<p><b>7. AC/DC &#8211; <i>Back in Black</i> (1980)</b><br />Without this album, what would the <i>Iron Man </i>trailers be like? A lot more Black Sabbath, that&#8217;s what. Fortunately, we don&#8217;t have to live in that world, because AC/DC rocked are asses away back in 1980. I&#8217;m not a fan of the schoolboy uniform shtick, however. Gross.</p>
<p><b>6. The Cure &#8211; <i>Disintegration</i> (1989)</b><br />What are they the cure for? Boredom? A world full of bad music? The mainstream? Does anyone know? Anyway, after years of not really giving a crap that everyone told me I should listen to The Cure, I finally hit up <i>Disintegration</i> and found myself enjoying it thoroughly. Who knew?</p>
<p><b>5. De La Soul &#8211; <i>3 Feet High and Rising</i> (1989)</b><br />De La Soul delivered what is basically my favorite hip hop album in 1989. What does that say about my hip hop credibility? Not much good. But I just love that in the era of gangster rap, these three guys put together a fun, positive album that pretty much anyone could enjoy. Kevin, if you read this, &#8220;Eye Know&#8221; is that song that samples Steely Dan&#8217;s &#8220;Peg.&#8221;</p>
<p><b>4. New Order &#8211; <i>Power, Corruption &amp; Lies</i> (1983)</b><br />I few weeks back Colin played some tracks off <i>Power, Corruption &amp; Lies </i>much to my chagrin. Except &#8220;Age of Consent&#8221; is amazing. Who knew you could do a song driven by crazy drums and bass? Now I have to listen to it all the time. And there are some other pretty fucking outstanding songs on this bad boy, such as &#8220;The Village&#8221; and dance hit (?) &#8220;Blue Monday.&#8221; Whoosh!</p>
<p><b>3. Big Country &#8211; <i>The Crossing</i> (1983)</b><br />OK, we all know &#8220;In a Big Country&#8221; is basically the best song in the history of music. So you can imagine how happy I was when I put this record on and was treated to the longer cut of the song leading off the LP. The rest of the songs can&#8217;t quite live up to it, but don&#8217;t begrudge them that. They&#8217;re pretty good. Well, some are pretty forgettable. But it&#8217;s good. There&#8217;s a reason these guys were far from a one-hit-wonder in Europe.</p>
<p><b>2. U2 &#8211; <i>Joshua Tree</i> (1987)</b><br />I&#8217;m not certain about this, but <i>Joshua Tree </i>might be my favorite U2 album. That is perhaps because the first four tracks make one of the best starts to any album I&#8217;ve ever heard. But don&#8217;t let me be misunderstood, every song on this album is a triumph. If you asked me a few weeks ago if there was any Eighties albums worth getting, this would be the first one I&#8217;d bring up. Well, except for the next album on this list.</p>
<p><b>1. The Pixies &#8211; <i>Doolittle</i> (1989)</b><br />It took me a while to get <i>Doolittle</i>. I had listened to it a few times, but what really helped me along the way was when Colin, John and I played through the whole album in <i>Rock Band</i>. Since then, it has become one of the few albums I always keep on my iPhone, indeed, one of my go-to records. From Kim Deal&#8217;s intro to &#8220;Debaser&#8221; all the way through &#8220;Gouge Away,&#8221; <i>Doolittle </i>is an experience that went on to influence pretty much all the music I like.</p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-large;"><b><span style="color: #cc66cc;">Top 10 Video Games of the 1980s</span></b></span></p>
<p><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TKLHEp0oENI/AAAAAAAAA6c/ZaOSrGkg8r8/s1600/595672-q_bert__1983___parker_bros__1.png" imageanchor="1"><img border="0" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TKLHEp0oENI/AAAAAAAAA6c/ZaOSrGkg8r8/s1600/595672-q_bert__1983___parker_bros__1.png" width="430" /></a></p>
<p>The Eighties were the heyday of the arcade game. Starting in the late 1970s, we had years of awesome titles until Nintendo came along and ruined it for everyone by putting out the Nintendo Entertainment System. Except the NES also birthed some of the most beloved games of all time. Games like <i>Mega Man</i>, <i>The Legend of Zelda </i>and <i>Metroid </i>were omitted because I haven&#8217;t played nearly enough of them. I&#8217;m sorry! I wasn&#8217;t born yet!</p>
<p><b>10. <i>Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles</i> (1989)</b><br />I&#8217;m iffy on this pick, since <i>TMNT </i>just set up the formula for what would be the greatest beat-em-up of all time, <i>Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles IV: Turtles in Time</i>. But a lot of what makes that game great is present in the original, plus this gave me a way to get the Turtles on one of my lists. I love those guys.</p>
<p><b>9. <i>Frogger</i> (1981)</b><br />I love how simple games in the Eighties were. You play as a frog, and you&#8217;ve got to get across that road. I guess it probably should have been a chicken, but then you wouldn&#8217;t get the tricky cross the pond, eat the fly, get in the cave part of the game. That&#8217;s where all the real action is.</p>
<p><b>8. <i>Joust</i> (1982)</b><br />So you&#8217;re this jouster guy. And you ride an ostrich. And you have to knock the other ostrich-riding jousters into the lava below. Yeah, that all makes a lot of sense. <i>Joust </i>was one of my dad&#8217;s favorite arcade games, so I guess it&#8217;s genetic.</p>
<p><b>7. <i>BurgerTime</i> (1982)</b><br />This makes you hungry, Colin? You want a giant burger that a chef&#8217;s been running over? <i>BurgerTime </i>is kind of like a lesser <i>Lode Runner</i>, except it&#8217;s awesome. What does level four look like? I&#8217;d love to know.</p>
<p><b>6. <i>Galaga</i> (1981)</b><br />I thought I could throw <i>Space Invaders </i>on this list, but apparently that classic came out in the Seventies. So instead I give you <i>Galaga</i>, which is basically <i>Space Invaders </i>but better in every way. I am serious.</p>
<p><b>5. <i>Tetris</i> (1985)</b><br />Funny story about <i>Tetris</i>: the Russian guy who invented it? He basically gets no money for it thanks to Russia being kind of messed up and also Nintendo screwing him. Poor fella. Oh, also, they gave you this for free if you bought a GameBoy. And I had to play the Russian folk son that you probably associate with this game is my junior high guitar class recital. Yup.</p>
<p><b>4. <i>Contra</i> (1987)</b><br />If it wasn&#8217;t for <i>Contra </i>we wouldn&#8217;t have some of the most important concepts in gaming. The Konami code, the spread gun, and some other third thing. Yeah, it&#8217;s a hard. Suck it up. Like a straw. Or a vacuum. Or the 2010 Seattle Mariners.</p>
<p><b>3. <i>Donkey Kong</i> (1981)</b><br />We&#8217;ve got a kill screen coming up! Originally titled <i>Monkey Kong</i>, the game got accidentally renamed and thus one of gaming&#8217;s most legendary characters was born. I guess the Donkey Kong we know today is actually supposed to be Donkey Kong, Jr., which is probably why he just goes by DK. Doesn&#8217;t wanna live in his dad&#8217;s shadow.</p>
<p><b>2. <i>Pac-Man</i> (1980)</b><br />Paku-Man was translated into Puck-Man, but Namco figured putting out arcade units labeled &#8220;Puck-Man&#8221; would make it too easy for vandals to rename the game &#8220;Fuck-Man.&#8221; Which would have been awesome, let&#8217;s all face it. The Pac-Man table is one of my favorite arcade cabinet designs, very classy. Paku-paku, bitches.</p>
<p><b>1. <i>Super Mario Bros.</i> (1985)</b><br />Hey, wow, sweet, what a big surprise. Yeah, you could argue the formula was perfected by <i>Super Mario Bros. 3</i>, but that didnt&#8217; even come out in the U.S. until 1990. I, for one, did not import it from Japan when I a baby. And you know what, <i>Super Mario Bros. </i>is video games. Everyone loves it. It just doesn&#8217;t get more classic than this. It&#8217;s simple and yet deep, challenging and rewarding. It&#8217;s right up there with <i>Pong </i>in contention for the most important video game ever made.</p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-large;"><b><span style="color: #cc66cc;">Top 10 Movies of the 1980s</span></b></span></p>
<p><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TKLUPygD8aI/AAAAAAAAA6g/eZic6anZ_uQ/s1600/BACK_TO_THE_FUTURE-0.jpg" imageanchor="1"><img border="0" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_wko6Q7QOLV4/TKLUPygD8aI/AAAAAAAAA6g/eZic6anZ_uQ/s1600/BACK_TO_THE_FUTURE-0.jpg" width="430" /></a></p>
<p>Movies were definitely to hardest to narrow down to just ten. Without looking at a list or anything, I was able to come up with around 30 films that I thought were worth being on a top 10 list. I had to make some deep, painful cuts, but here is my final top ten of the Eighties.</p>
<p><b>10. <i>Robocop</i> (1987)</b><br /><i>Robocop</i>&#8216;s got it all. Action, one-liners, hilariously over-the-top villains, real social themes, and an interesting take on the dystopian future. It&#8217;s so good I refuse to watch the sequels, since I don&#8217;t want to know what they do to the franchise.</p>
<p><b>9. <i>Airplane!</i> (1980)</b><br />I know this should be my number one, just pretend this is a typo. It&#8217;s rare to find a movie so loaded down with puns. There&#8217;s basically this and other Eighties comedy juggernaut <i>The Naked Gun</i>. And some other movies too. I don&#8217;t really know where I&#8217;m going with this. Funny movie!</p>
<p><b>8. <i>Major League</i> (1989)</b><br />The hardest question Flick Chart never asked me: <i>Bull Durham </i>or <i>Major League</i>? It&#8217;s a close call, that&#8217;s for sure. And if the umps had instant replay, maybe we could be more certain. But instead I&#8217;m gonna have to call what I saw, and instinct says <i>Major League </i>is more fun. Tough call, though.</p>
<p><b>7. <i>Back to the Future</i> (1985)</b><br />I think when most people think about Eighties movies, they think of <i>Back to the Future</i>. It&#8217;s kind of a miracle a movie like this works, since the plot is surprisingly complex, I mean, even the title is confusing if you haven&#8217;t seen the movie. Too bad the sequels couldn&#8217;t quite live up to the original. I&#8217;m not one of those fanatics that watches this all the time, but I always enjoy it when I can catch it.</p>
<p><b>6. <i>Raging Bull</i> (1980)</b><br />There are few movies better than <i>Raging Bull</i>. But this is not the list of the best movies of the 1980s. These are my favorites. And as much as I was blown away by <i>Raging Bull</i>, I haven&#8217;t even gone back and watched it a second time. A Hell of a film, though.</p>
<p><b>5. <i>Die Hard</i> (1988)</b><br />My top five are all films I&#8217;ve seen like a million times. <i>Die Hard</i> is definitely on my short list for greatest action movie of all time. John McClane is simply one of the best protagonists in action movies, and Hans Gruber is a terrific antagonist. It&#8217;s kind of becoming a Christmas tradition in my family, too.</p>
<p><b>4. <i>Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan</i> (1982)</b><br />It&#8217;s even quotable. &#8220;You&#8217;ve managed to kill everyone else, but like a poor marksman, you keep missing the target.&#8221; &#8220;From Hell&#8217;s heart I stab at thee. For hate&#8217;s sake, I spit my last breath at thee.&#8221; &#8220;The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one.&#8221; <i>Star Trek: The Motion Picture </i>is kind of a joke. <i>Khan </i>is undeniable.</p>
<p><b>3. <i>Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Ark</i> (1981)</b><br />Do heroes get any cooler than Indiana Jones? I guess you could argue for McClane, or Han Solo, but come on. A teacher who spends his free time traveling the world collecting presumably long-lost magical artifacts? Plus, he uses a whip. Anyone else would make that seem really weak. Not Indy.</p>
<p><b>2. <i>Ghostbusters</i> (1984)</b><br />Another comedy movie with a oddly complex plot. I&#8217;m not even sure I get the whole thing, like, why does Gozer need to transform? Just to fuck with them? Ah well, this is one of the funniest movies ever made, and I wish I was watching in right now.</p>
<p><b>1. <i>Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back</i> (1980)</b><br />Can you dig it? <i>Star Wars </i>is certainly the most important film franchise in my life; I&#8217;ve enjoyed the whole series since I was but a boy. <i>Empire Strikes Back </i>gave us Yoda, Lando, Hoth, a real lightsaber fight, a shocking revelation, a long-awaited romance and almost killed C-3PO. How you gonna beat that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mildlypleased.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=737</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>102</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>80s Week: John&#8217;s Lists</title>
		<link>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=736</link>
		<comments>http://mildlypleased.com/?p=736#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 07:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Ten]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mildlypleased.com/dmdo/?p=736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks like were going to have a busy couple of weeks. In addition to &#8220;80s Week&#8221;, I imagine we&#8217;ll have some movie reviews next week, maybe a review of the latest installment of Ken Burn&#8217;s Baseball and I will of course begin my &#8220;Shocktober&#8221; feature, where I&#8217;ll review 31 movies in 31 days. Though until [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like were going to have a busy couple of weeks. In addition to &#8220;80s Week&#8221;, I imagine we&#8217;ll have some movie reviews next week, maybe a review of the latest installment of Ken Burn&#8217;s <i>Baseball</i> and I will of course begin my &#8220;Shocktober&#8221; feature, where I&#8217;ll review 31 movies in 31 days. Though until than let&#8217;s hop in our Deloreans  and take a blast to the past. </p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-large;"><b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #cc66cc;">Top 10 Albums of the 1980s</span></b></span></p>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TKLhq6hQZuI/AAAAAAAABls/Sq7IFiEPVCM/s1600/bruce-springsteen.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="" border="0" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5522224220489148130" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TKLhq6hQZuI/AAAAAAAABls/Sq7IFiEPVCM/s320/bruce-springsteen.jpg" style="height: 240px; width: 320px;" /></a></div>
<p><b>10. The Traveling Wilbury&#8217;s &#8211; <i>The Traveling Wilbury&#8217;s Vol. 1</i> (1988)</b><br />Some of rock&#8217;s finest gathered together to jam? It&#8217;s just as much fun as it sounds as; Harrison, Orbison, Petty, Dylan and Lynne let loose on this late 80s hoedown. I think you&#8217;ll find a lot of these choices have already been discussed here in some form, so let&#8217;s keep movin&#8217; down to the end of the line. </p>
<p><b>9. John Fogerty &#8211; <i>Centerfield</i> (1984)</b><br />Talented CCR frontman John Fogerty&#8217;s comeback album is a savory return to the Bayou. &#8220;The Old Man Down the Road&#8221; could&#8217;ve easily been a CCR hit and the same could be said for most of this album&#8217;s bluesy tracks. The title track could arguably be the greatest baseball rock song ever and that enough is worth standing up to cheer. </p>
<p><b>8. U2 &#8211; <i>Joshua Tree</i> (1987)</b><br />The trailer for <i>The Kingdom</i> got me into this album, isn&#8217;t that weird? &#8220;Bullet in a Blue Sky&#8221; I remember, from that moment on  I was immersed. </p>
<p><b>7. Tom Petty &#8211; <i>Full Moon Fever</i> (1989)</b><br />It&#8217;s only got like a million hits.</p>
<p><b>6. Michael Jackson &#8211; <i>Thriller</i> (1982)</b><br />Can&#8217;t resist… Dancing, ugh, so catchy!</p>
<p><b>5. Bruce Springsteen &#8211; <i>Born in the U.S.A.</i> (1984)</b><br />I could&#8217;ve of been cool and picked  <i>The River</i> but when it comes down to it this album &#8220;just is America.&#8221; The official soundtrack to the working man, <i>Born in the U.S.A.</i> is an important work worth saluting. </p>
<p><b>4. Kraftwerk &#8211; <i>Computer World</i> (1981)</b><br />Clean cut German guys making bleeps and bloops? Count me in! I&#8217;ve never considered myself a big electronic fan but this album is infectious. It&#8217;s so basic in melody, rhythm and lyrics and yet it I find myself fully absorbed. Sigh, I wish I had a better relationship with my calculator.</p>
<p><b>3. Violent Femmes &#8211; <i>Violent Femmes</i> (1982)</b><br />The pinnacle of underground, acoustic, folk, punk and so on. Often I find some of the most memorable albums to be the the hardest to define, so who knows what genre this is. All I know is I love the simplicity of this album and these songs are pitch perfect anthems for your your regular angsty outcast</p>
<p><b>2. George Harrison &#8211; <i>Cloud Nine</i> (1987)</b><br />Sometimes album just resonate with you for reasons that are hard to explain. I&#8217;m aware there may be hundreds of albums more important than what, like George Harrison&#8217;s 11th album? But I bought this not long after he died and with it&#8217;s optimistic pop melodies it&#8217;s quickly become one of, if not my favorite post-<i>Beatles</i>  solo album. </p>
<p><b>1. Pixies &#8211; <i>Doolittle</i> (1989)</b><br />&#8220;Quiet, loud, quiet, loud&#8221; such a simple approach and yet the <i>Pixies</i> are arguably one of most influential artists of alternative music. Raw, clever, catchy, funny, they&#8217;re always entertaining whether they&#8217;re pounding out a feisty rocker or just dicking around the studio. Frank Black is one of those guys that never gives you anything less than 100%. <i>Doolittle</i> is an alternative masterpiece. </p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-large;"><b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #cc66cc;">Top 10 Music Videos of the 1980s</span></b></span></p>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TKLpIBXPitI/AAAAAAAABl0/7SWdKQ39mrY/s1600/thriller460.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="" border="0" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5522232417123797714" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TKLpIBXPitI/AAAAAAAABl0/7SWdKQ39mrY/s320/thriller460.jpg" style="height: 202px; width: 330px;" /></a></div>
<p><b><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJGiBuFA8cQ">10. &#8220;She Was Hot&#8221; &#8211; The Rolling Stones</a></b><br />It&#8217;s hardly cutting edge or even remotely notable but it&#8217;s pure 80s cheese at it&#8217;s best.  I like this one part where this buff dude&#8217;s bicep explodes.</p>
<p><b><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDBkySeyiDo">9. &#8220;Coming Up&#8221; &#8211; Paul McCartney</a></b><br />Paul McCartney basically miming the single off of his 1980 album <i>McCartney II</i> but who is his backing band? Why it&#8217;s who else but Paul McCartney. Actually the illusion is fairly convincing in the wide shots. My favorite McCartney clone is probably &#8220;Heavy Metal McCartney&#8221; but &#8220;Weird, Mustachioed, Keyboard Playing&#8221; McCartney is a close second.</p>
<p><b><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kxr3tV-ieyY">8. &#8220;When We Was Fab&#8221; &#8211; George Harrison</a></b><br />&#8220;The Quiet Beatle&#8221; reminisces about the days of Beatlemania while odd sight gags happen around him. There&#8217;s this one part where he has four arms, oh yeah and Ringo is there too!</p>
<p><b><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MeG-hNXXy6I">7. &#8220;Down Under&#8221; &#8211; Men at Work</a></b><br />Don&#8217;t you hate videos that take themselves far too seriously? Where you&#8217;re not even sure what the video has to do with the song? Whatever the matter, I love watching these wacky boys from down under in this verbatim collection of silly set pieces.</p>
<p><b><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I1wg1DNHbNU">6. &#8220;Once in a Lifetime&#8221; &#8211; Talking Heads</a></b><br />I as well have a fondness for David Byrne&#8217;s spastic movements. </p>
<p><b><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_EXxMlIExpo">5. &#8220;Take On Me&#8221; &#8211; A-ha</a></b><br />The pictures… Gasp, they&#8217;re coming alive!</p>
<p><b><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-O5IHVhWj0&amp;ob=av3e">4. &#8220;It&#8217;s Tricky&#8221; &#8211; Run DMC</a></b><br />Who you do call when Penn &amp; Teller steal your money a la three card monte? That&#8217;s right, Run DMC and this video really gets me moving. The editing flows perfectly with song&#8217;s rhythm and it&#8217;s a real treat seeing Run DMC teaching Penn &amp; Teller to be cool</p>
<p><b><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t2mU6USTBRE&amp;ob=av2e">3. &#8220;Fat&#8221; &#8211; Weird Al Yankovic</a></b><br />I wouldn&#8217;t be able to live with myself if I didn&#8217;t include at least one Weird Al video. This one is just one of my all-time favorites, ha, ha fat people. &#8220;Yo, ding dong, ding dong yo.&#8221; pure brilliance. </p>
<p><b><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AsEjsIbWq88">2. &#8220;Call Me Al&#8221; &#8211; Paul Simon</a></b><br />I first saw this video at a very young age in the 90s and loved it even before I knew who Paul Simon or Chevy Chase was. It&#8217;s so simple, so silly, and yet so perfect. </p>
<p><b><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sOnqjkJTMaA&amp;ob=av2e">1. &#8220;Thriller&#8221; &#8211; Michael Jackson</a></b><br />To quote my friend Colin &#8220;Well duh&#8221;</p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-large;"><b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #cc66cc;">Top 10 Video Games of the 1980s</span></b></span></p>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TKLqFm7r8eI/AAAAAAAABl8/0VcKB3oGrEs/s1600/golden_axe_beast_rider.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="" border="0" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5522233475180786146" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TKLqFm7r8eI/AAAAAAAABl8/0VcKB3oGrEs/s320/golden_axe_beast_rider.jpg" style="height: 237px; width: 320px;" /></a></div>
<p><b>10. <i>Altered Beast</i> (1988)</b><br />If it wasn&#8217;t for this we may have never had  &#8220;Welcome to your Doom!&#8221; as Death&#8217;s catch phrase in our videos. It can be a tricky game but if you can &#8220;bend the rules&#8221; if you know what I mean, you&#8217;ll have a lot of fun. Some of the monster transformations in this game are just awesome and I always enjoy watching the hero get ridiculously buff. The graphics are great for the time and it&#8217;s overflowing with 80s charm. </p>
<p><b>9. <i>Pac-Man</i> (1980)</b><br />What an uninspired choice right? What can I say? I&#8217;m a sucker for the classics. Though I never truly got to experience &#8220;Pac Man Fever&#8221; I like many have enjoyed playing it in various pizzerias over the years. </p>
<p><b>8. <i>Frogger</i> (1981)</b><br />The best game ever made about roadkill. </p>
<p><b>7. <i>Joust</i> (1982)</b><br />Such fond memories of Sean and I playing this back in the day. Of course that was on an &#8220;Atari Best of…&#8221; type cartridge but it was special nonetheless. </p>
<p><b>6. <i>Contra</i> (1987)</b><br />It&#8217;s hard as hell but damn, talk about action packed! As frustrated as you might get you wont be able to put it down.</p>
<p><b>5. <i>Donkey Kong</i> (1981)</b><br />I used to practice the Game Boy port for hours with dreams of doing at least okay in the arcade. Sadly I always cracked under the pressure but I still love the game.  </p>
<p><b>4. <i>Q*Bert</i> (1982)</b><br />What&#8217;s going on here? Some weird creature, hopping around an isometric platform from a  third-person perspective? Actually, I think the fact that this game is is different is why I like it so much, plus he swears, he&#8217;s badass. </p>
<p><b>3. <i>Golden Axe</i> (1989)</b><br />Definitely one of the best side-scrollers of it&#8217;s time. Brimming with skeletons, dragons, and bosses that are always about a hundred feet taller than you, <i>Golden Axe</i> is as much fun as ever. Nothing beats playing as an angry dwarf fighting the evil &#8220;Death Adder&#8221;!</p>
<p><b>2. <i>Super Mario Bros. 3</i> (1988)</b><br />It&#8217;s like the first one but better, awesome?</p>
<p><b>1. <i>Tetris</i> (1984)</b><br />So addictive… I could play for about twenty years straight. </p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-large;"><b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #cc66cc;">Top 10 Movies of the 1980s</span></b></span></p>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PL5dC8CTtoI/TKLqx1IoskI/AAAAAAAABmE/ijdVHSrP_44/s1600/big-cp-w6108483.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) 
